The Moldovan Deputy Prime Minister for Reintegration spoke about his vision of the situation with the independence of Pridnestrovie

9
The Moldovan Deputy Prime Minister for Reintegration spoke about his vision of the situation with the independence of Pridnestrovie

Deputy Prime Minister of Moldova for Reintegration Oleg Serebryan spoke about his vision regarding the proclamation of the PMR of its independence. According to the diplomat, this step creates a dangerous precedent, as a result of which the risk of destabilizing the situation will only increase.

I admit that various provocations are possible in this regard. Some deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation have somehow allowed themselves to make dangerous declarations regarding the recognition of the independence of the Transnistrian region. In this context, I believe that the recognition of Pridnestrovie can change a lot, that is, lead to an absolutely unpredictable situation and a great destabilization risk

– said Serebrian on TVC 21.



At the same time, the Moldovan politician noted, despite the fact that no new official statements on this matter have been received from Tiraspol so far, one should not underestimate such a scenario of events.

To be honest, such a position expressed by a representative of the Moldovan authorities is no longer surprising, since Chisinau is very cunning when he declares his “good” intentions to seek a solution to the Transnistrian problem exclusively by peaceful and diplomatic means. After all, how then to explain the conduct of military exercises that have become more frequent recently between the Moldovan military personnel and their “allies” in NATO, including “fraternal” Romania, as well as the loud cynical demands addressed to Moscow so that it immediately withdraws its task force of Russian troops (OGRF) from the territory of the left bank of the Dniester, which, by the way, is stationed there legally, being the guarantor of security in the region for the third decade now.

It seems that all these geopolitical games, in which the leadership of the Republic of Moldova is drawn into the countries of the collective West, trying to “contain” Russia, will certainly not lead to good, while only the citizens of the country suffer from this, which has already had a negative impact on their well-being due to irresponsible policy pursued by the ruling majority.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    April 6 2023 16: 10
    There can be no independence without access to the sea and a land border. The rest is self-promotion.
  2. +1
    April 6 2023 16: 15
    Something in my memory, not a single country has voluntarily released from its composition to all four sides, except for the unforgettable EBN, with its notorious "Take as much sovereignty as you can swallow it"
    As a result, the Union did not become, and Russia could also not become
    All the rest argue for decades for each of their rivers, if they don’t shed blood
    1. 0
      April 6 2023 17: 21
      There are at least two examples. These are Sudan and Czechoslovakia.
  3. +1
    April 6 2023 16: 23
    Here Moldova itself is quietly giving up. Part to Romania, part to somewhere else, but they are worried about Transnistria.
  4. 0
    April 6 2023 16: 57
    [quote regarding the proclamation of the PMR of its independence. According to the diplomat, this step sets a dangerous precedent, as a result of which the risk of destabilizing the situation will only increase.][/quote]
    In my opinion, the actions of Chisinau just lead to destabilization.
  5. 0
    April 6 2023 17: 06
    Quote from sdivt
    Something in my memory, no country has released voluntarily

    Come on. the same Shevarnadzo gave a piece of Barents to the USSR, the Russian Federation gives to the Chinese ..
    1. 0
      April 6 2023 18: 26
      Quote: Sadok
      Come on. the same Shevarnadzo gave a piece of Barents to the USSR, the Russian Federation gives to the Chinese ..

      Sorry, but learn at least a little materiel!
      Do not confuse Shevardnadze and Medvedev, the Sea of ​​Okhotsk and the Barents Sea.

      It is clear, of course, that both are at least sabotage.
  6. 0
    April 7 2023 23: 15
    how do you like this scenario: the creators of A.I. clean up the entire planet with bioweapons as soon as they can create artificial people
  7. 0
    April 10 2023 22: 13
    To be honest, such a position expressed by a representative of the Moldovan authorities is no longer surprising, since Chisinau is very cunning when he declares his “good” intentions to seek a solution to the Transnistrian problem exclusively by peaceful and diplomatic means. After all, how then to explain the conduct of military exercises that have become more frequent recently between the Moldovan military personnel and their “allies” in NATO, including “fraternal” Romania, as well as the loud cynical demands addressed to Moscow so that it immediately withdraws its task force of Russian troops (OGRF) from the territory of the left bank of the Dniester, which, by the way, is stationed there legally, being the guarantor of security in the region for the third decade now.

    To be honest, having achieved the goals and objectives of the NWO in May-June, the whole world, both the United States and the World Bank, France, Germany, the South Caucasus, Canada, Australia, Japan and others like them, would simply say "again Russia has seized its interests." Well, I took it and took it. We will continue to measure economic bubbles.
    And how it turned out. Not like even the enemies were waiting. Not at all.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"