British spy: To "capture" the Crimea, Kyiv needs to carry out an operation comparable to the "landing of the allies in Normandy"

54
British spy: To "capture" the Crimea, Kyiv needs to carry out an operation comparable to the "landing of the allies in Normandy"

Great Britain supplied Ukraine 14 tanks Challenger 2, but these "fantastic machines," as Ukrainian Defense Minister Reznikov called them, will not help Kyiv "liberate" Crimea. According to former senior intelligence officer Philip Ingram, the Armed Forces of Ukraine do not have the strength and means to do this.

Today, Russia controls 17% of the territory of Ukraine and has a much better trained army, superior to the Armed Forces of Ukraine both in terms of the number of personnel and in all types of weapons. With the overwhelming superiority of the Russians, Kiev continues to plan the "liberation" of the Crimea by force, hoping for supplies of Western weapons and armored vehicles. However, Western countries are not able to supply the volume of weapons required by Ukraine, and time is playing against the Ukrainian army.



Ingram argues that capturing Crimea would require a much larger military operation comparable to the Allied landings in Normandy in 1944. But Ukraine does not have the opportunity to organize a second D-Day, and NATO does not intend to interfere in the conflict with Russia.

Russia holds over 100 thousand square meters. km of the territory of Ukraine and it has another 800 military "on the ground", and to return the Crimea, an operation is needed in the style of "landing in Normandy"

Philip Ingram said.

The British expert believes that in the event of a counteroffensive, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be able to "punch holes" in the built defenses of the Russian army, but the successes of the Ukrainians will end there, it will not be possible to interrupt the supply chain to the Crimea, as well as to block the peninsula.

In the meantime, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are waiting for the onset of warm weather, which will allow Western armored vehicles to enter the battle without fear that they will drown in the mud.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    54 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. -3
      April 2 2023 10: 28
      And what is it to them? Yes, like two fingers on asphalt. Olano, crow louder, about the "inevitable seizure of Crimea"
      1. -1
        April 2 2023 11: 00
        British spy: For the "capture" of the Crimea, Kyiv needs

        Throw the last Natsiks with a parachute over the Crimea and Zelensky too !!!
        Let the snipers practice
        And our Su-shki will piss on them laughing crying
        1. +8
          April 2 2023 11: 20
          Quote: Grandfather Pikhto
          Throw the last Natsiks with a parachute over the Crimea and Zelensky too !!!
          Let the snipers practice

          You can throw it away without parachutes, so as not to waste cartridges on them. winked
          1. +6
            April 2 2023 11: 35
            Kyiv needs to conduct an operation comparable to the "landing of the allies in Normandy"
            So, let them land there (in Normandy) and as many as possible, it’s good there, there is democracy ...
            1. +2
              April 2 2023 13: 31
              Quote: NIKNN
              Kyiv needs to conduct an operation comparable to the "landing of the allies in Normandy"
              So, let them land there (in Normandy) and as many as possible, it’s good there, there is democracy ...

              They just don't know or remember anything bigger than D-Day. Moreover, they are sure that this is what predetermined "THEIR" victory in World War II.

              All British intelligence - to the desks! The history of not the Second World War, but the Great Patriotic War to teach! ...
          2. +1
            April 2 2023 11: 42
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            Quote: Grandfather Pikhto
            The last Natsiks throw with a parachute over the Crimea and Zelensky too!!!
            Let the snipers practice

            Can be thrown without parachutesso as not to waste ammo on them. winked

            Then it’s not over the Crimea - what for are they needed there?
          3. +2
            April 2 2023 11: 55
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            You can throw it away without parachutes, so as not to waste cartridges on them.

            As in that joke about a falling plane: "Glory to Ukraine! Putin shouted and threw Zelya out of the plane" and the plane stopped falling.
      2. +2
        April 2 2023 11: 05
        That's the point - that it will not be enough to capture the strength, but as soon as it becomes possible to fire, albeit not very accurately, they will definitely do it.
        Ukroreich's methods are absolutely fascist, and Europe prefers to turn a blind eye to this and continues to supply BC.
        1. +5
          April 2 2023 11: 41
          So simple about fascist methods.
          The Nazis of Hitler's Germany began to sink floating hospitals AFTER the British began to shoot down German rescue hydroplanes in the strait (How are the Britons different from the Nazis?)
          Well, the democratic bombing of German cities is no better than the actions of the German Air Force.
          But what is the palm of the Amersaxes is the atomic boom on the Japanese.
          So Europe used to close its eyes. So, on trifles about the military customs of the Angles and Franks, to the heap in the Crimean War, having taken part of Sevastopol, English and French marauders opened the graves of Russian admirals and stole (so out of disgusting habit) Gold epaulettes.
          Moreover, the Turks did not stoop to that.
          In the word Europpa.
    2. +4
      April 2 2023 10: 31
      I wonder what the Western press will write about after we move to the right bank of the Dnieper?
      Probably when we get closer to Lvov, the Western press will still dream of taking the Crimea.
      1. 0
        April 2 2023 10: 49
        If you are interested, about the professionalism of British intelligence. The Taliban recently or just infa came, they arrested three Englishmen in Afghanistan. "Hotel manager" ???!!! his arrogance was already pulled out once, after the shameful flight of the Americans from Afghanistan.
      2. -2
        April 2 2023 12: 15
        [Probably when we get closer to Lviv, the Western press will still dream of capturing Crimea]
        Read the fresh concept of foreign policy, conqueror of lions. There: peace, friendship, chewing gum and no lions.
      3. +1
        April 2 2023 13: 34
        Quote from Fizik13
        Probably when we get closer to Lvov, the Western press will still dream of taking the Crimea.

        Wangyu that when we get closer to Lviv, and, moreover, to the Polish border, the number of "allies" in Russia will increase dramatically, exponentially, and they will still push their elbows, proving to each other which of them introduced the least sanctions and gave Kiev the least weapons.
      4. -1
        April 2 2023 20: 01
        what will the Western press write about after we move to the right bank of the Dnieper?

        Already moved. in Kherson. And you don’t need to read the press trap, it’s enough to read the times of last autumn.
    3. +2
      April 2 2023 10: 31
      And where will the Ukrainians take battleships to cover the landing at least two. Yes, British intelligence reported that our intelligence services have achieved success in forming a network of informants in Ukraine. And this work was carried out before the NVO. (Norwegian media). Americans. Let them try to put themselves first in the DPRK.
      1. -11
        April 2 2023 10: 53
        Probably the British fleet will help and enter the Black Sea as in 1854, and the United States will remove from conservation the battleships of the Second World War, which last participated in hostilities in 1991 in the Persian Gulf.
        1. 0
          April 2 2023 14: 03
          The appearance of American and British ships in the Black Sea during the hostilities of the Russian Federation and Ukraine is excluded, Turkey will not let them through the straits
    4. -3
      April 2 2023 10: 31
      For the Normandy landings in June 1944, the United States and Great Britain had absolute air and sea superiority.
      Ukraine has only to dream of the superiority of its Navy and Air Force over the Russian Federation.
      Crimea is a carrot for the dumbest in Ukraine.
    5. +20
      April 2 2023 10: 33
      And what was the cost of the Allied landing in Normandy without the powerful press of the Soviet offensive?
      1. -9
        April 2 2023 10: 43
        And without the large-scale conspiracy of Stauffenberg, which involved the entire command of the Wehrmacht in France.
      2. -3
        April 2 2023 12: 33
        Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
        And what was the cost of the Allied landing in Normandy without the powerful press of the Soviet offensive?

        When the Normandy landings took place, there was no offensive on the eastern front. Then yes, the offensive in Belarus greatly helped them expand their foothold.
        1. 0
          April 2 2023 16: 02
          A brief lull does not negate the fact that the front was inexorably rolling to the West, and also that the main forces of the Germans were pinned down by Soviet troops.
      3. 0
        April 2 2023 17: 56
        on the western front, the contingent of the Wehrmacht and the SS troops was the most unfit for combat. They sent all the sick ... half-sick ... castrates ... cowards ... half-pokers, etc. All combat and experienced units fought on the eastern front. So the US and its allies fought the semi-pokers..
    6. +8
      April 2 2023 10: 41
      Well, where where, but in Normandy, the allies performed strongly. With total domination of the sea, full of air, only allies could crap like that. By filling up with corpses, somehow with a sin in half, they were still able to land. And who did they defeat there? With the exception of one GU Panzer Division and a pair of SS TTBs? Which, by the way, took part in the battles much later than the actual landing. Plus army, though elite, training TD. The rest of the German "army" is security and stationary divisions, without tanks, practically without artillery, assembled from the disabled and wounded from the Eastern Front, who are not fit for military service of all sorts of different older military personnel and vice versa younger ages. Tin. And these still tell us about the blockage of meat performed by the Red Army. As they say, we wish them to repeat all this in the Crimea, though already without the fleet and aviation.))))
    7. +1
      April 2 2023 10: 41
      The material of the article makes one think about the future of Odessa and Nikolaev, and their future depends on the duration of the existence of the current regime sitting in Kyiv. Well, taking into account the events taking place in the Kyiv Lavra, the Kyiv regime has about half a year left to sit. In other words, until autumn. Well, in the winter, we will talk about the landing over a cup of hot tea.
      1. -2
        April 2 2023 10: 54
        Now only one thing is clear - if the Russian army, following the results of the NMD, remains standing on the Dnieper, the US Navy bases will be located in Odessa, Nikolaev and Kherson.
        1. 0
          April 2 2023 14: 18
          I think this is understood in the RF Ministry of Defense, but the plans are kept secret. The operation to cross the Dnieper in the direction of Kherson and further to Nikolaev, Ochakov
          and Odessa is very difficult and fraught with heavy losses, so if you really have to carry it out, then together with offensives in several directions ....
    8. +1
      April 2 2023 10: 54
      Banderlogs are unlikely to succeed in capturing Crimea, but they will try. I think that now there are a lot of hacks from various sources in order to misinform and confuse our military and political leadership. Not the fact that the attack on the Crimea or not the fact that only the Crimea. I hope our intelligence is getting reliable information and the troops will be ready for the offensive planned by the Banderlogs. An offensive that fails for bloomers can greatly change the course of the NWO.
      1. 0
        April 2 2023 11: 04
        "but they will try." ///
        ---
        But certainly not from the sea.
        And trying to capture the land isthmuses.
        So, it is incorrect to compare with the landing in Normandy.
        Rather, it can be compared with the capture of the Crimea by the Red Army in the Civil War.

        And then, it will be a diversionary maneuver for Russia to keep significant forces in the Crimea.
        1. 0
          April 2 2023 13: 24
          But certainly not from the sea.


          And if through the Dnieper? What do you think about it?
    9. +2
      April 2 2023 10: 56
      Captain Evidence warns: "Omaha beach awaits you...".
    10. +2
      April 2 2023 10: 59
      British expert says
      . And Uncle Vova and others are strongly against it.
    11. +15
      April 2 2023 11: 00
      It is easier for the Armed Forces of Ukraine to capture London than Crimea!
    12. -2
      April 2 2023 11: 04
      Russia holds over 100 thousand square meters. km of the territory of Ukraine and it has another 800 military "on the ground", and to return the Crimea, an operation is needed in the style of "landing in Normandy"

      You remember the West tried to take Sevastopol .. There were 15 times more of you!
      The Russians sent you and defended the Crimea!
      Let's go to hell, once again check us for a tooth ..
    13. +4
      April 2 2023 11: 12
      As I understand it, this expert is simply not aware of Manstein's operations to seize the Crimea and the Soviet army to liberate it, so he dragged Normandy in. Another dummy, laughing
    14. 0
      April 2 2023 11: 13
      It is much more interesting that in order to force the Dnieper - dill, it is necessary to carry out an operation similar to which there is no and never has been in the history of the armies of the countries that are now members of NATO! Remind me of river crossings with armored vehicles. OOPS...
      PiSi: and then recently they began to sculpt nonsense - the amphibious assault is radically different.
    15. +2
      April 2 2023 11: 14
      For the Anglo-Saxons, the landing in Normandy is the height of tactical art, they simply have nothing else to compare with.
    16. 0
      April 2 2023 11: 15
      How their desire is itching, if not to defeat Russia, then at least to spoil it.
    17. 0
      April 2 2023 11: 24
      Military specialists are well aware that it is unrealistic to return the Crimea to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but politicians in Kyiv and their "Assistants" will exaggerate this topic indefinitely with the sole purpose of obtaining funding, weapons, and
      in order to prolong the conflict between Ukraine and Russia as long as possible, not only between countries, but also at the international level in order to isolate Russia
    18. +1
      April 2 2023 11: 25
      Wet dreams about D-Day.
      What deaf-blind-mute these Britons are!
      Your day became possible only because a very significant part of the Wehrmacht was either destroyed by the USSR or tied up on the Eastern Front, and the Americans chose the moment of the invasion, postponing it for at least a year (!), Having in the rear the military-industrial complex of the undestroyed industry of America, dispersed in the rear, yes and British colonies and dominions such as India, Australia and Canada.
      And even so, everything did not go smoothly at all, and by January 45, even a serious threat loomed over the allies in the Ardennes, they ran to Stalin: uncle, save him, he is fighting!
      And Stalin helped, launched an underprepared operation two weeks ahead of schedule, forced the Germans to withdraw troops from the Ardennes pocket.
      This is already in recent decades, the Anglo-Saxons have mythologized their invasion, like it was the main and only event that decided the course of the Second World War, and the Russians are unclear for whom they were ...
      1. 0
        April 2 2023 11: 33
        Well, we guys are knowledgeable and well-read, so this bullshit will not work for them.))))
      2. 0
        April 2 2023 20: 31
        by January 45, even a serious threat loomed over the allies in the Ardennes, they ran to Stalin: uncle, save him, he is fighting!
        And Stalin helped, launched an underprepared operation two weeks ahead of schedule, forced the Germans to withdraw troops from the Ardennes pocket.

        No need to replicate this ancient mossy myth. None of the allies asked to save them. The Germans were defeated by the Allies in the Ardennes during an attempted counteroffensive, losing possible reserves for transfer to the Eastern Front, which Stalin wisely took advantage of and accelerated our offensive, without waiting for the Germans to recover from the Ardennes defeat from the Allies.
        The German counteroffensive ended in failure, failing to achieve its objectives. The Wehrmacht lost in battles more than a third of armored vehicles and almost all of the aircraft involved in the offensive, a large amount of resources, spent fuel and ammunition, which the Wehrmacht lacked at the end of the war. All this could be used on the Eastern Front.

        And this was used by our troops for a large-scale offensive, although ahead of schedule.
    19. 0
      April 2 2023 11: 50
      To "capture" the Crimea, Kyiv needs to carry out an operation comparable to the "landing of the allies in Normandy"

      Duc, my dears ... in order to carry out an operation comparable to the landing in Normandy, it is necessary that some of their powerful ally (which was the USSR for the Anglo-Saxons in the spring - summer of 1944) fettered the main forces of our armies in battle somewhere completely in the opposite place - so that we transfer the main forces there, as the Germans did in the spring of 44, in order to stop the 1st Ukrainian Front, which moved like a tank, pulling the German forces onto itself. As a result, the north-west of Europe was exposed, and the allies got a 15-fold advantage there.
      Do they have such an ally? Will he pull back the main forces of the RF Armed Forces while the ukrovermacht will "land in the Crimea"?
    20. 0
      April 2 2023 11: 53
      The US and NATO countries are already in a deep hole. Chaos, strikes, bankruptcies, inflation is what Biden and his accomplices have now created in their countries. It's like in the movie "Dumb, Dumber". In Crimea, the vast majority of Russians and Russian speakers, they will all stand up with weapons in their hands against Bandera. If necessary, Russia will send a million fighters of the RF Armed Forces to protect the Crimea and new regions of Russia. Russia has a nuclear shield for a reason. Bandera never won anywhere, only the senile Biden could bet on them, and even then for bribes to his family. Even the Nazis did not respect Styopa Bandera. It's time to pack the suitcases for Bandera, led by Zelensky.
    21. +3
      April 2 2023 12: 20
      There is only one "but" for the "new Operation Overlord", now to seize the Crimea: the Anglo-American Expeditionary Force will have nowhere to return to.
    22. -1
      April 2 2023 12: 22
      here in Normandy .. vnature .. purely * corpses * filled up the Nazis * allies * ... there, in my opinion, the Nazis .. from their * lawn mower * 2/3 of the Anglo-Saxons killed.
    23. -1
      April 2 2023 12: 24
      Wait, wait, what about Taurida, i.e. Sea of ​​Azov, has it not been conquered yet, or is this not a question anymore? Unclear.
    24. 0
      April 2 2023 12: 24
      only one BUT ... now it’s not the middle of the 20th century, the 21st century .. you can see everything in full view ... and Russia is not Iraq for them .. or Afghanistan ... NATO cattle are used to ... fighting with the enemy with impunity .. in which obviously fewer options.
      * then they also brag about this disgrace ... to fight with * Africa *.
    25. +1
      April 2 2023 12: 32
      British scientists, smoked, soaked, now a British intelligence officer, who's next?)
    26. 0
      April 2 2023 15: 13
      Another pensioner, respectfully speaking, is talking nonsense. fool
    27. 0
      April 2 2023 17: 02
      To capture the Crimea, the West needs betrayal. All other methods are useless.
    28. 0
      April 2 2023 17: 37
      you need to smoke less with Zelepukin together!
    29. 0
      April 2 2023 20: 06
      Ingram argues that capturing Crimea would require a much larger military operation comparable to the Allied landings in Normandy in 1944.

      Where does VO get such "experts"?
      It took Manstein two days to break through the defenses of the Perekop Isthmus, and to clearly show that the level of command of troops is more important than the number of tanks.
      But the "expert", it seems, did not even hear about this story. And what else is more strange, they didn’t even mention this in the article on VO.
    30. 0
      April 2 2023 20: 39
      In the meantime, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are waiting for the onset of warm weather, which will allow Western armored vehicles to enter the battle without fear that they will drown in the mud.


      The Ukrainians would have driven their Challengers to the North before it was too late, they would have received a good reward for them, and they would have written off everything for drowning in the mud ....
    31. The comment was deleted.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"