Attacks were made on enemy reserves in the cities of Druzhkovka and Marganets

Russian troops continue to destroy the reserves of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near the city of Artyomovsk, where the Wagner assault detachments are advancing.

The main fire impact is directed at the personnel and equipment of the enemy in the cities of Konstantinovka, Kramatorsk, Slavyansk and Druzhkovka. It is there that the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has recently been trying to concentrate large forces in order to try to recapture both Artyomovsk (Bakhmut) itself and its settlements, which are part of the agglomeration along with it.

It became known that as a result of today's strike on objects in Druzhkovka, the personnel of the reserve of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, including those transferred from the central part of Ukraine, were defeated.

It is also reported about the strikes on military targets on the right bank of the Dnieper. So, the place of deployment of the Ukrainian reserve in the city of Marganets, Dnepropetrovsk region, was defeated. The city is located on the opposite side of the Dnieper (Kakhovsky reservoir) from the Russian Energodar.

Recall that earlier, on the night of March 31, the Russian Armed Forces thwarted the movement of the reserves of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to the Kupyansk direction, striking the enemy in Kharkov and the region. Objects were also hit in the part of the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions occupied by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Targets were hit in Chernihiv and Sumy regions. For this, various means were used, including high-precision long-range artillery munitions, as well as percussion drones.

Comments

[Orange Bigg]

It is also reported about the strikes on military targets on the right bank of the Dnieper. So, the place of deployment of the Ukrainian reserve in the city of Marganets, Dnepropetrovsk region, was defeated. The city is located on the opposite side of the Dnieper (Kakhovsky reservoir) from the Russian Energodar.

And why don’t they hit the bridges across the Dnieper with BetAB-1500 or UPAB-1500B. It seems like they said that air defense is interfering, but here they are hitting on the right bank of the Dnieper and air defense somehow doesn’t interfere much. So what’s the matter then?

[Alex_ekb]

Why the hell should they be beaten if the dills themselves are dying of them during the retreat?

[Orange Bigg]

Quote from Alex_ekb

Why the hell should they be beaten if the dills themselves are dying of them during the retreat?

So that heavy equipment and ammunition are not brought to the line of contact through these bridges and with its help they do not kill Russian citizens at least and cannot oppose our Army.

[Terenin]

Quote from Orange Bigg

Quote from Alex_ekb

Why the hell should they be beaten if the dills themselves are dying of them during the retreat?

So that heavy equipment and ammunition are not brought to the line of contact through these bridges and with its help they do not kill Russian citizens at least and cannot oppose our Army.

Probably, they argue that it is better to destroy them on this line of contact than later in the central and western regions of Ukraine, when our logistics will be more vulnerable.

[Orange Bigg]

Are you sure that things will reach the central and western regions of Ukraine, if you allow endless flows of equipment and ammunition to freely enter the armament of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the line of contact through these bridges? I'm not sure.
And if there hadn’t been constant replenishment of personnel, equipment and ammunition through these bridges, Avdeevka, Marinka, Bakhmut, Ugledar would probably have already been taken.

[Sebostyuan]

It's not about that. My personal opinion (I have voiced it more than once). The spoon is good for dinner. Power outage and destruction of railway bridges. nodes, command and communication centers, warehouses, etc. It must be carried out in conjunction with your defense or offensive plans.
You decide for yourself which is better. Destroy the bridges now, giving the enemy time to organize logistics, or at the moment when the Wehrmacht goes on the "offensive", cut off his supply.
There are also exotic options: Stupidity, Betrayal, Ability to trade (money is now in exchange for lives and destruction tomorrow). But with this approach, the chances of being in Goag or winning the elections in 24g are 50/50. and I don't believe in them.

[Grits]

Quote from Orange Bigg

And if there were no constant replenishment through these bridges with personnel, equipment and ammunition, Avdeevka, Marinka, Bakhmut, Ugledar would probably have already been taken

I think if there were no these bridges, then the LBS would now pass along the Dnieper near these destroyed bridges.

[cat Rusich]

Quote from Alex_ekb

Why the hell should they be beaten if the dills themselves are dying of them during the retreat?

Without bridges across the Dnieper, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will not be able to hold the Left-Bank Ukraine...
The Armed Forces of Ukraine will not be able to hold the front without constant replenishment with shells, equipment (self-propelled guns, tanks, infantry fighting vehicles ...), fuel and lubricants and replenishment of personnel.

[Andrey Andreev_2]

And why not destroy bridges, tunnels, junction stations, electric depots and other logistics facilities located on the territory of Ukraine near its border with Poland, Hungary, Romania, Moldova ... where do Western 'gifts' come from??? This is probably the case in the business of some of our compatriots and the Chinese ... (((

[Dart2027]

Quote from Orange Bigg

and then they hit on the right bank of the Dnieper

They fire missiles without entering the air defense zone.

[Orange Bigg]

Well, let it be at least with the same X-32 missiles or Daggers, or at least with the help of UPAB-1500B gliding bombs, without entering the air defense zone of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

[Rumata]

Quote from Orange Bigg

So what's the deal then?

Have you been banned from Google Maps?

[Orange Bigg]

Quote: Rumata

Quote from Orange Bigg

So what's the deal then?

Have you been banned from Google Maps?

Explain. What does Google Maps have to do with it if it arrives at the same Yavoriv training ground if desired? And this is almost the westernmost point of Ukraine on the border with Poland.

[Rumata]

Quote from Orange Bigg

Explain.

From Marganets to Energodar only 20 km.))))
They beat, of course, not from Energodar itself. Even art gunners get elementary.
Bridges are a big problem. Nothing to quickly and effectively destroy. Hitting the barracks plus or minus 20 meters will already be 300 and 200, and the bridge with such accuracy would be at least something. It will fly by. Why don't they even try? An impartial question for the General Staff and the Commander-in-Chief.

[Andrey Andreev_2]

Have you tried strategic missiles with a conventional non-nuclear warhead? Instead of recycling, which is now taking place...

[Sergei_Bely]

I have already suggested that it seems quite realistic to re-equip the Satan silo-based missile instead of the FAB 9000 nuclear warhead, and direct fire from near the earth's orbit to the bridge. At the same time, the impact power will be sufficient to destroy any bridge.
But all this on the condition that the rockets did not sing completely.

[pawn]

the radius of destruction upab 1500 is written 50 km - probably there is not enough distance for the Dnieper for the safety of the aircraft.

[Rumata]

Quote: peshik

damage radius

Uncle, you are funny.
The radius of destruction and the range of application are 2 sooooo big differences.)))) Learn the materiel.

What is the radius of destruction from nuclear weapons?
An explosion with a power of 20 kt gives a zone of complete destruction with a radius of about 1 km, 20 Mt - already 10 km. According to calculations, with an explosion with a capacity of 100 Mt, the zone of complete destruction will have a radius of about 35 km, strong destruction - about 50 km, at a distance of about 80 km, unprotected people will receive third-degree burns.

[musorg]

Do not boil everything, be type top! Call Shoigu, he will calm you down!

[Leshak]

Good news for the night. The reserves of the Armed Forces of Ukraine must be knocked out. In addition to the Bakhmut meat grinder, the consumption of drugs is decent.

[Mikhail Maslov]

These are really preemptive measures. Do not let the enemy concentrate, knock out reserves (we can’t on distant approaches) in the rear of the line of contact. When we impose our tactics on the enemy, then there is a result. Act on preemption, fetter any intentions of the enemy. in the end, it will lead to the fact that the offensive will be postponed in time, which means that the losses of the enemy will increase.

[Carlos Hall]

Well done, send them to hell. This is a good opportunity to inflict colossal losses in a defensive battle.

[Fintiflushkin]

Quote from Orange Bigg

And why don’t they hit the bridges across the Dnieper with BetAB-1500 or UPAB-1500B. It seems like they said that air defense is interfering, but here they are hitting on the right bank of the Dnieper and air defense somehow doesn’t interfere much. So what’s the matter then?

so they lie like dogs

[Nord11]

It’s high time for the EU and the USA to ask for yellow-black fabrics, otherwise soon there will be nothing to put flags on the graves of heroes from ..

[Incvizitor]

The fascists have had a good time before.

[Sibiryak70region]

It's all good. The main thing is that then again there will be no regroupings

[kill the fascist]

It would be nice to hit the deep rear in the same way, but ... That's also not bad.

[Fangaro]

NWO.
There are no Levitans for the news.
He doesn’t even consider it necessary to come up with an author for VO.
Some time later, VO will be perceived not as an abbreviation for Military Review, but as VO, NVO, look, again they write. (((

[Ulum]

Quote from Orange Bigg

It is also reported about the strikes on military targets on the right bank of the Dnieper. So, the place of deployment of the Ukrainian reserve in the city of Marganets, Dnepropetrovsk region, was defeated. The city is located on the opposite side of the Dnieper (Kakhovsky reservoir) from the Russian Energodar.

And why don’t they hit the bridges across the Dnieper with BetAB-1500 or UPAB-1500B. It seems like they said that air defense is interfering, but here they are hitting on the right bank of the Dnieper and air defense somehow doesn’t interfere much. So what’s the matter then?

Uselessly. BetAB will make holes in the concrete, but the bridge will not be destroyed. The defeat of capital bridges and the incapacitation of paved runways for a long period of time is a rather difficult task, both for aviation and for missilemen.

[Vladimir Dmitrievich Burtsev]

It is necessary to actively use incendiary charges, such as flamethrowers. Instead of blowing up every Bandera tank or bunker, it's easier to burn them down. The damaging effect of incendiary charges is more than twice as high as high-explosive ones. For flamethrowers, the radius of destruction of the enemy is limited by the range of their firing. And in the VKS, the radius of destruction has practically no limit. Well, the flag is in the hands of the valiant VKS, load the Tu-95 with homing glide bombs with an incendiary charge or a charge with a volumetric explosion and send it to Avdiivka. One Tu-95 sortie should be enough to solve the problem of Avdiivka.