Military Review

Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN: Deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus does not violate international obligations

14
Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN: Deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus does not violate international obligations

The Russian Federation, intending to deploy a tactical nuclear weapon in Belarus weapon (TNW), does not violate by these actions its international obligations and existing agreements on the non-proliferation of such weapons. This was stated by the Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN and the UN Security Council Vasily Nebenzya, speaking at a meeting of the Security Council of the international organization.


As the Russian diplomat noted, Moscow is building its relations with Minsk without any violation of international agreements. Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin, recalled Nebenzya, directly indicated that nuclear weapons would not be transferred to Belarus.

The permanent representative revealed some nuances of deploying tactical nuclear weapons in a neighboring country. According to him, Belarus will receive the Iskander-M operational-tactical missile system. In addition, the aircraft of the Air Force of Belarus will be properly re-equipped, and their crews will undergo appropriate retraining to work with nuclear weapons. Also, a special storage facility for tactical nuclear weapons will be built in the country.

However, Nebenzya noted, we are not talking about the transfer of weapons. Tactical nuclear weapons, being on the territory of Belarus, will remain under the control of Russia. Consequently, Nebenzya implies the implementation of approximately the same model that the United States uses in the countries of Western Europe, where for more than half a century American nuclear weapons have been deployed at numerous military bases, including in Germany itself.

It is worth noting that the West itself by its actions forced Russia to take such a step as the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus. His indignation on this issue is cynical, since there are American nuclear weapons in Europe.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
14 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ulan.1812
    Ulan.1812 31 March 2023 19: 29
    +4
    Of course there is no violation.
    This is Ya.O. remains Russian and under Russian control.
    The West does not like it when, as Khrushchev said, "they put a hedgehog in their pants."
  2. Alexga
    Alexga 31 March 2023 19: 31
    +2
    The permanent representative revealed some nuances of deploying tactical nuclear weapons in a neighboring country. According to him, Belarus will receive the Iskander-M operational-tactical missile system. In addition, the aircraft of the Air Force of Belarus will be properly re-equipped, and their crews will undergo appropriate retraining to work with nuclear weapons. Also, a special storage facility for tactical nuclear weapons will be built in the country.

    Today Lukashenka casually mentioned that the Polonaise can also carry a special charge.
  3. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 31 March 2023 19: 36
    +1
    To Nenbenzya 's direct question : Is the US deploying nuclear weapons in Europe ? The US representative to the UN Security Council was silent. If he is silent, then he respects. He wanted to introduce the US representative to the UN using Western values ​​such as the KKK *, not all blacks are equal in the US changed his mind. Maybe his distant relatives were slaves? Or is he from newcomers in the 20th century.
  4. evgen1221
    evgen1221 31 March 2023 19: 38
    0
    Well, they are purple in principle, after 5 minutes they die or after half an hour. One fig, they will be the first to start with a mass launch of missiles and a preliminary departure abroad.
  5. blackGRAIL
    blackGRAIL 31 March 2023 19: 40
    +2
    Doesn't break??? Russia has been breaking spears over American tactical nuclear weapons in Europe for many years, arguing that the deployment of nuclear weapons in Europe in countries that do not have their own nuclear weapons is a violation of the NPT both on the part of the country that deploys these weapons, and on the part of the country on territory where the weapons are located.

    The answer is symmetrical, but the world is heading towards the destruction of all arms-limiting treaties.
  6. Rumata
    Rumata 31 March 2023 20: 35
    +3
    Quote: Ulan.1812
    Ulan.1812 (Boris Gerasimov)

    I will tell you as a native, the deployment of some units of the Strategic Missile Forces in the Republic of Belarus also does not contradict anything.
    1. Ulan.1812
      Ulan.1812 31 March 2023 20: 42
      +2
      Quote: Rumata
      Quote: Ulan.1812
      Ulan.1812 (Boris Gerasimov)

      I will tell you as a native, the deployment of some units of the Strategic Missile Forces in the Republic of Belarus also does not contradict anything.

      Undoubtedly. The comment is short, but short, but clear.
  7. t-12
    t-12 31 March 2023 20: 38
    -2
    And what does the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus give in general? It is also possible to threaten the Poles and Germans from Kaliningrad. The Iskanders will not reach Washington, it is the missiles that need to be sent to Cuba, and preferably to Bermuda.
    1. blackGRAIL
      blackGRAIL April 1 2023 09: 44
      +1
      Gives a new base location (for threats to the Poles and Germans). And there is an opportunity to threaten the Romanians, Bulgarians, Czechs and Slovaks (this was not the case before).
  8. Al manah
    Al manah 31 March 2023 20: 53
    0
    But what our Chinese said strategic partners:
    China opposes the transfer of nuclear weapons to other countries and their deployment outside its territories. This was stated by Deputy Permanent Representative of China to the UN Gen Shuang. It is reported by "The Rambler".

    “We are in favor of a ban on the transfer of nuclear weapons so that no nuclear countries transfer their nuclear weapons abroad and place them outside their country,” he said.

    Shuang recalled that in 2022, five leaders of nuclear countries declared that it was impossible to win a nuclear war, since such a conflict could not be allowed to arise. China calls on all nuclear powers to stick to their commitments and avoid conflicts between nuclear states to reduce the risk of nuclear war, he said.
    1. Ulan.1812
      Ulan.1812 31 March 2023 21: 39
      +3
      Quote: Al Manah
      But what our Chinese said strategic partners:
      China opposes the transfer of nuclear weapons to other countries and their deployment outside its territories. This was stated by Deputy Permanent Representative of China to the UN Gen Shuang. It is reported by "The Rambler".

      “We are in favor of a ban on the transfer of nuclear weapons so that no nuclear countries transfer their nuclear weapons abroad and place them outside their country,” he said.

      Shuang recalled that in 2022, five leaders of nuclear countries declared that it was impossible to win a nuclear war, since such a conflict could not be allowed to arise. China calls on all nuclear powers to stick to their commitments and avoid conflicts between nuclear states to reduce the risk of nuclear war, he said.

      Well, he is right. Only he is not about the Russian Ya.O. but about such weapons of any countries. Incl. and American.
      Russia also spoke about this many times, only the Americans spat.
      This step of Russia is just a response.
      1. Al manah
        Al manah 31 March 2023 21: 56
        -1
        Only he is not about the Russian Ya.O. but about such weapons of any countries. Incl. and American.

        But for some reason, he announced this not when the Americans began to deploy their nuclear weapons, but when we announced our intention to do so. But this, of course, is a coincidence, and the Chinese are our friends, yes.
  9. Denis812
    Denis812 April 1 2023 11: 55
    0
    I, as a person living in Krakow, feel a little uncomfortable, but the logic of Russia is understandable.
    Moreover, Comrade Robert Wood previously clearly said that by deploying nuclear weapons in Europe, the United States does not violate the NPT, well, OK, which means that the Russian Federation does not violate either.

    Although if we follow the spirit and letter of the NPT, then the export of nuclear weapons to the territory of another state is, in fact, the transfer of indirect control to this state, since it is sovereign in this territory.
    Therefore, the United States is violating the NPT and the Russian Federation will also, in fact, violate it.

    But as I understand it, everyone is already on all the contracts to the bulb, things are heading for a big war, and it would be very stupid for Russia not to have nuclear weapons on time where it will be needed most.
    1. Essex62
      Essex62 April 2 2023 01: 03
      0
      The world, somehow suddenly, has gone crazy and is running towards self-destruction in huge leaps. Are the contradictions so real that they cannot be resolved without a general disappearance? Something is wrong here. It looks like a mistake in the classification, Homo sapiens is not a super-intelligent predator. Stupid, stupid even. This is when they poked each other with pieces of iron and cut them, well, even when they crushed them from cannons, it still passed. But today.