A petition for the deployment of nuclear weapons in the country appeared on the website of the President of Ukraine

42
A petition for the deployment of nuclear weapons in the country appeared on the website of the President of Ukraine

An initiative group of Ukrainian residents has petitioned President Volodymyr Zelensky to withdraw from the Budapest Memorandum and restore the state's nuclear status. The petition itself was published on the official website of the Ukrainian leader.

The petition emphasizes that the legal right of the Kyiv regime to restore the status of a nuclear power is connected with the special military operation launched by Russia and the deployment of a tactical nuclear weapons Russia in Belarus. As stated in the document, Ukraine does not have to have its own nuclear weapons, but it has the right "to use them."



Currently, the petition has collected about 150 signatures out of the required 25 signatures that are needed for consideration by the President of Ukraine. Earlier, a number of Ukrainian politicians have already declared the desirability of restoring Ukraine's nuclear status. These statements and petitions should be taken seriously. As you know, at first the idea is thrown into the media space, which prepares public opinion for the discussion of this issue, and then it may well be implemented.

The West may also move away from existing prejudices about deploying nuclear weapons in Ukraine, especially if this is required to achieve the ultimate goal of the defeat and collapse of the Russian state. Western countries that possess nuclear weapons may well provide the Kyiv regime with appropriate assistance in acquiring their own nuclear weapons, at least in a small amount.

The question is what measures Russia can take to ensure that such issues are no longer raised by the Ukrainian side, and that the Western patrons of the Kiev regime do not allow thoughts of possible assistance in acquiring nuclear weapons for Ukraine.
  • Wikipedia / Michael. nuclear silo
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    30 March 2023 16: 32
    Idiocy am How to explain to Saloreikha that they will have nuclear weapons only in the form of a Tactical nuclear charge from Russia that arrived on them, for example, for the entry of NATO troops into the territory of Ukraine ???
    1. Maz
      +1
      30 March 2023 16: 34
      Yes, immediately aliens, heaven and hell to place on the square. What is there to take so small? Is it so modest, only nuclear weapons? What about a time machine, a hyperboloid?
    2. +6
      30 March 2023 16: 34
      Well, why just so? It may also appear there when they become part of the Russian Federation. laughing
    3. +8
      30 March 2023 16: 39
      Quote: ANIMAL
      Idiocy am How to explain to Saloreikha that they will have nuclear weapons only in the form of a Tactical nuclear charge from Russia that arrived on them, for example, for the entry of NATO troops into the territory of Ukraine ???


      In order to attach a tactical charge to Grom-2, which we so kindly allow to be produced in Ukraine under the conditions of the NWO. So that further, as in Bandera dreams, they dream of hitting Moscow. And for now we allow this to my great surprise. destroy the production of OTRK Grom-2.
      1. +2
        30 March 2023 17: 05
        Minus uryakly sad or irreversible.... request I can't tell them apart anymore request ..... wink
        1. 0
          30 March 2023 18: 17
          Because, in essence, these are patients of the same institution, they are only placed in different wards.
      2. 0
        30 March 2023 17: 10
        Quote from Orange Bigg
        So far, for some reason, we do not dare to destroy the production of the Grom-2 OTRK.

        Apparently, these are old stocks. They have been talking about Thunder for a long time,
      3. 0
        30 March 2023 19: 10
        Quote from Orange Bigg
        To attach a tactical charge to Grom-2, which we so kindly allow to be produced in Ukraine under the conditions of the NWO.

        Well, they can make it, Grom-2, in the same Poland, at their own production and with OV components. If mass production is deployed, then it will not be sweet for us.
        1. 0
          31 March 2023 11: 02
          Quote: Zoer
          Well, they can do it, Thunder-2, in the same Poland

          Grom-2 has a composite hull, which can only be wound in two places - in Dnepropetrovsk or Pavlograd. And since the engines of such missiles can only be equipped ... in short, there. Of course, it is possible to drag all this to Poland ... in principle ... but it will take a lot of time, effort and money. it's easier to do it where everything for this is already there. At worst, you can transfer production underground.
          Grom-2 is a Ukrainian replica of the Russian Iskander-M, but with a composite engine case (Iskander had to be made of metal) and a navigation unit from Reyheon.
          Quote: Zoer
          If mass production is deployed, then it will not be sweet for us.

          If allowed as before, they will make a nuclear bomb.
    4. 0
      30 March 2023 17: 09
      Quote: ANIMAL
      How to explain to Saloreikh that they will have nuclear weapons

      No way. They are not going to place it, but to sell it, but who dares, substitute their YaFugasses for discredit. laughing
    5. 0
      30 March 2023 17: 21
      The question is, what measures can Russia take so that such issues are no longer raised by the Ukrainian side.....

      I think there is only one way out: - to drive a nail into the coffin called "Ukraine".
  2. -1
    30 March 2023 16: 36
    Ze prankster, the option to repeat what we did together with Belarus will not work for you. No one in the West will exchange their well-being and good well-being for the Natsiks, for the boneheads and those who dreamed of lace underpants. You will never be given a wunderwaffle.
    1. 0
      30 March 2023 16: 39
      They do not need to give anything, they will make the prodigy themselves, it is a matter of time.
      1. 0
        30 March 2023 17: 08
        Quote: Bomb
        They do not need to give anything, they will make the prodigy themselves, it is a matter of time.

        Let's put the right accents!
        They COULD make something vigorous - a "dirty bomb" explosive device - for example. But WE WILL NOT ALLOW THIS ... up to the destruction of the site and the production of fissile materials.
        Our bosses, I think, have enough mind and political will for this.
        IMHO.
        1. 0
          30 March 2023 18: 20
          Our bosses, I think, have enough mind and political will for this.

          You should not think so.
  3. 0
    30 March 2023 16: 38
    They, Ukrainians, can do whatever they want, but at the same time they must receive explanations, directly from the GDP, that the capacity for its production and it itself will be destroyed PREVENTIVELY by the use of nuclear weapons.
    1. 0
      30 March 2023 16: 46
      It is necessary to preventively destroy this monster-Ukraine itself as a state
  4. +6
    30 March 2023 16: 39
    Jokes aside, but as long as Ukraine exists as a legitimate state, the West will not stop using it.
    1. +1
      30 March 2023 16: 42
      As long as Ukraine exists as a state, it will always strive to destroy Russia with the help of the West.
      1. +3
        30 March 2023 16: 54
        No. It is the West that seeks to destroy Russia using Ukraine.
        1. +1
          30 March 2023 17: 04
          It's a mistake to think so. The West plays a leading resource role, and in aspirations they coincide; for the West, the UKR is the best watchdog with an anti-Russian gene.
          1. 0
            30 March 2023 18: 00
            There is no anti-Russian gene. Brainwashing, coupled with upbringing and Selyuk's (here I agree) genes. And of course, the financial support of the West. Ukraine cannot pull its own means, and it’s a pity, then.
            1. 0
              30 March 2023 18: 39
              Why would the West destroy Russia? it's just that there's so much talk about it, but has anyone ever thought about it rationally?
  5. +1
    30 March 2023 16: 40
    Who knows, but there is an opinion that Chernobyl greatly influenced the consciousness of the "big ones"! History does not teach, and there is nothing to teach (a saucepan on the head as an indicator), then let them shy away, the main thing would not have reached us.
  6. 0
    30 March 2023 16: 40
    ....petition collected 150 signatures....

    Aha! 150 potential suicides are campaigning in their ranks.
    Zelebobus and close associates will somehow hide, but the residents will not be saved
  7. -1
    30 March 2023 16: 40
    The Russian Federation can help deploy nuclear weapons in Ukraine with air delivery.
  8. +4
    30 March 2023 16: 41
    As soon as Ze hinted at nuclear weapons, his own began, since he left us no other choice. What will happen after the new statements, one can only guess.
  9. 0
    30 March 2023 16: 48
    it means that a bomb is being riveted somewhere underground, in fact it’s a small problem, there are a lot of stations ... there is something to think about
  10. -4
    30 March 2023 16: 49
    Someone constantly and obsessively bends the line that a protracted war is beneficial to the Russian Federation, this is a battle of resources, not military ones. Of course, this is one of the main components of any war. But we immediately affirm, when it comes to the United States, this is a proxy war. why Mr. Blinkin directly stated "if America is not a leader and hegemon, let the whole world fly to hell." And who told you that nuclear missiles will not end up in Ukraine. a lot, including our deployment of nuclear weapons in the BR. What the United States is losing, but there is nothing (they are behind a puddle again) only accelerates the degree. But the Russian Federation and the EU should think hard. will receive an order to start a nuclear war, albeit limited
    1. -3
      30 March 2023 16: 55
      Someone constantly and obsessively bends the line that a protracted war is beneficial to the Russian Federation

      Yes, the 140 millionth, technologically dependent Russian Federation will "rapidly develop" and the 850 millionth West, which has crushed most of the world, "will weaken and fall apart." Idiocy or logic waiting.
  11. +1
    30 March 2023 16: 52
    What is it about, there is no point in preserving this state, even thinking about it, its very nature is deceitful and hostile. Of course, after 70 years of "friendship of peoples" the conclusion sounds unusual and even chauvinistic, but the history of Ukrainian identity is such that it cannot be rewritten.
  12. +1
    30 March 2023 16: 59
    As far as I understand, militarily, today we are doing everything we can afford.
    What additional response can we give to the clear threat of Ukraine acquiring nuclear weapons? Be the first to start using it? But it is quite possible that this collection of signatures is a provocation that encourages us to do so. Don't guess.
    It seems that a good response step would be to announce our readiness to transfer nuclear weapons not only to Belarus, but also to other countries.
    For example, Iran. Or maybe Syria
    It is clear, but to announce readiness is not yet to be conveyed, but, as a signal, we will perceive it.
    This should cool the overly violent
  13. +1
    30 March 2023 17: 26
    Who will give them something.
    This is a double-edged sword. This petition can be interpreted in different ways.
    Let's say so.
    Iran or Syria do not have to have their own nuclear weapons, but they have the right to "use" them.
    Mongolia and Uganda are right, the worse they are. Well and so on wassat
  14. 0
    30 March 2023 17: 31
    All sorts of fives can be offered, but who will give them.
  15. 0
    30 March 2023 17: 47
    collected about 150 signatures out of the required 25 signatures

    And what is there to discuss? 150 of the required 25?
    And this needs
    These statements and petitions should be taken seriously.
    ?
  16. 0
    30 March 2023 18: 02
    The question is what measures can Russia take so that such issues are no longer raised by the Ukrainian side,
    The measures are quite understandable - to quickly finish with the diggers of the Black Sea, and we have been messing around for a whole year.
    1. 0
      30 March 2023 18: 31
      It seems that the "initiative group of residents" wants the termination of the treaties on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. 0
    30 March 2023 18: 50
    I really liked the Ukrainian fat, it is unlikely that I will consume radioactive, feed it to a stoned green parrot, along with an American senile.
  19. 0
    30 March 2023 19: 08
    If things continue as they are now, in a year they will have nuclear weapons. And, do not shout now that there will be no Banderostan in a year. Will. Already shouted it, a year ago. Forgot? And, as soon as nuclear weapons appear, they will trim them. Immediately. By the way, remember the famous saying "women with a scythe" about nuclear weapons and whom they need to exterminate.
  20. 0
    30 March 2023 19: 08
    It's time to give Zelensky to the tribunal for his crimes, and he walks in heroes everywhere. And he teaches everyone how to live, helping Bandera with weapons and billions of euros and dollars. There are untouchables like Vovik Zelensky in the square!
  21. 0
    30 March 2023 21: 01
    Quote: Volunteer Marek
    And, as soon as nuclear weapons appear, they will trim them.

    Will not apply. Not them, not us, not anyone else. Nuclear weapons are a deterrent weapon. Not action.
    Anyone who first used nuclear weapons automatically becomes a target for everyone.
    And no one will provide them with these nuclear weapons. Talking about him is also a deterrent.
    Create yourself - probably can. They have nuclear power plants, weapons-grade plutonium was probably produced. Even if it was not developed before, then for a year of hostilities - for sure. I assume that they are already at some stage of creation. But to apply, even against the hated Russia - to put yourself behind the line, to sign a death sentence. Because, whatever one may say, they won’t have time to create a lot, and for isolated cases we will have a 100% not a single answer at all.
    Why should they untie our hands?
    Will not apply.
  22. 0
    31 March 2023 06: 47
    The petition talks about the restoration of the nuclear status of Ukraine. There was never a mention of Ukrainian nuclear weapons, there were strategic and tactical nuclear weapons of the former USSR, located on the territory of the former Ukrainian SSR. By his last Decree, the outgoing President of the outgoing USSR M.S. Gorbachev handed over control of the nuclear weapons of the USSR to the President of the Russian Federation B.N. Yeltsin (neither Kravchuk, nor Nazarbayev, nor Shushkevich, although nuclear weapons were located in Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus), along with the "nuclear suitcase" of the Supreme High Command. On the territory of the Ukrainian SSR there were strategic nuclear weapons (SBCh ICBM and RSD units of the Strategic Missile Forces and SBCh parts of the DA of the USSR Air Force) and tactical nuclear weapons (SBCh of operational tactical aviation, OTRK and artillery, engineering nuclear warheads, to be honest, I have no information about the SBCh of air defense missiles, although ZUR S -200 were in Ukraine). Tactical nuclear weapons were taken out by 12 GUMOs from all the republics of the USSR to the territory of the Russian Federation during the aggravation of the socio-political situation. Ukraine, in its national style, proclaimed as its property all the weapons and military equipment of the USSR Armed Forces on its territory, including the aircraft carrier of the Northern Fleet, DA aircraft, ICBMs, etc. Ukraine, with all its desire, could not use nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons have never been produced in Ukraine, the developers (NIITF, NIIEF) and manufacturers of nuclear weapons were also in the Russian Federation, and nuclear weapons have a special maintenance system, including designer and factory supervision. Imagine: there is American nuclear weapons in Turkey, South Korea and a number of other countries, and suddenly one of them declares it to be theirs, who the United States would consider it to be - a nuclear terrorist or just crazy. The West didn’t need a new “nuclear power”, so according to the Budapest Protocol, all nuclear weapons from Ukraine were exported to the Russian Federation, and Ukraine was compensated for this with fuel for nuclear power plants. Nuclear weapons can only be afforded by economically wealthy countries, the same late L.M. Kravchuk frankly said that the maintenance of nuclear weapons needed 40 billion USD, which they did not have. Now, in a new way, the narcotic monkey - Pane ZE - is rushing onto the stage and demands a nuclear grenade. I think the West is smart enough not to give nuclear weapons to this clown. And we need to unequivocally warn that any nuclear weapons on the territory of Ukraine (western or their own) is a legitimate military target and will be immediately destroyed, as well as the infrastructure that can be used for the production of nuclear weapons.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"