Advisor to the head of the Crimea published a photo from the crash site of a Ukrainian drone shot down by the Russian Armed Forces

21
Advisor to the head of the Crimea published a photo from the crash site of a Ukrainian drone shot down by the Russian Armed Forces

In the Simferopol region of Crimea, air defense forces shot down a Ukrainian drone, with the help of which militants of the Kyiv regime once again tried to attack the peninsula. This was announced by the head of the republic Sergei Aksenov.

As it turned out, the APU UAV tried to strike at the given coordinates. But as a result of the effective work of electronic warfare, this was prevented. Regional authorities admitted that the Strizh drone could have been used. Aksenov's adviser Oleg Kryuchkov published photos from the UAV crash site on his Telegram channel.



Since July last year, the Ukrainian army has not stopped trying to strike at Sevastopol, where the main base of the Black Sea fleet, as well as other objects on the territory of the Crimean peninsula. During this time, attacks were made on the headquarters of the fleet, energy facilities and military airfields. Russian air defense systems successfully destroy a significant part of enemy drones.


On March 21 this year, Aksyonov said that a local resident was injured as a result of an attack by Ukrainian drones in the Dzhankoy area. air defense forces drones were destroyed. According to the head of the city administration Igor Ivin, several civilian infrastructure facilities, including a private house, a store and an educational institution, received minor damage.

Oleg Kryuchkov, adviser to the head of the republic, stressed that all Ukrainian drones used to attack Dzhankoy were aimed at civilian targets and, in addition to explosives, their warhead was stuffed with shrapnel, which could lead to numerous civilian casualties.

On March 22, servicemen of the Black Sea Fleet managed to successfully repulse an attack by Ukrainian surface drones on the Sevastopol Bay, where warships are moored. Rifle fire weapons all three enemy targets were destroyed.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    29 March 2023 19: 52
    Che is too small in my opinion for a swift funnel.
    1. +1
      29 March 2023 20: 18
      Che is too small in my opinion for a swift funnel.

      The soil is rocky.
      1. 0
        29 March 2023 20: 41
        The soil is rocky.
        I don’t know, but 120+ kg of warheads all the same.
      2. +1
        29 March 2023 20: 45
        Clay + southern chernozem, there are no stones so that
  2. +5
    29 March 2023 20: 00
    A couple of weeks ago, a similar funnel was near the village of Zhuravlevka, which stands a little further, it will be deeper. My homeland is Sofiyivka
  3. +7
    29 March 2023 20: 02
    The worst thing is that not this one, but the tenth, but it will reach the goal. Much to our regret.
    Someone correctly said that the best method of dealing with enemy UAVs is our tanks in the positions of enemy operators. And even better - on Khreshchatyk in Kyiv.
    1. -7
      29 March 2023 20: 19
      Quote: Quote Lavrov
      our tanks are in the positions of enemy operators. And even better - on Khreshchatyk in Kyiv

      Last year, the tanks of the Kantemirovskaya division were on Khreshchatyk. But there is a nuance. The photographs of the khinzirs show what happens when a division is bashed for parades for many years, and then they give an order to rush to Kyiv.



      1. -1
        29 March 2023 20: 31
        And I see in your photos not just tanks, but I think about the fate of the crews. The simplest guys. Probably, if you had a photo of the Moscow Region, the division commanders posted this, you could understand it, but the tanks, behind the levers of which ordinary guys were sitting .... sorry, but I don’t understand.
        1. +2
          29 March 2023 20: 40
          Tanks do not look burnt and their crews can be quite alive. If the Kantemirovites threw 90m completely intact, then why not.
          By the way, pay attention to there are no traces of hits, which means that the Ukrainians themselves took off the DZshki
      2. -1
        29 March 2023 20: 48
        Quote: ZhEK-Vodogrey
        tanks of the Kantemirovskaya division were on Khreshchatyk

        Do you determine the belonging of technology by instinct, or where?
        1. -3
          29 March 2023 21: 08
          Quote: Repellent
          Do you determine the belonging of technology by instinct, or where?

          Only the Kantemirovskaya division had T-80U gas turbine tanks. One captured T-80U with a decayed tactical cantima sign in the form of oak leaves is still chasing hinzirs between Chasov Yar and Bakhmut.


          1. +1
            29 March 2023 21: 33
            Quote: ZhEK-Vodogrey
            Gas turbine tanks T-80U were only in the Kantemirovskaya division

            Hm ... well, about half of the T80Us available in the RF Armed Forces (at the beginning of the NWO) were indeed in Kantemirovka. But to say on this basis that "specifically these" Kantemirov's tanks - IMHO pull an owl.

            Quote: ZhEK-Vodogrey
            captured T-80U with a decayed tactical cantima sign in the form of oak leaves

            Didn't see any leaves. No leaves - no reason to discuss request
            1. -3
              29 March 2023 22: 03
              Quote: Repellent
              No leaves - no reason to discuss

              Another figure in a rhombus is a tactical sign of the Kantemirovskaya division. The site compresses the photo, so it is not visible.

            2. -1
              29 March 2023 22: 15
              Quote: Repellent
              But to say on this basis that "specifically these" Kantemirov's tanks - IMHO pull an owl.

              They were on Khreshchatyk with oak leaves.
              1. -1
                29 March 2023 22: 28
                Quote: ZhEK-Vodogrey
                They were with oak leaves on Khreshchatyk

                With all due respect to your work, the "coat of arms" of Kantemirovka looks ... well, not at all request

                This is some kind of self-propelled gun, abibas, pardon my French ...

                By the way - not T80U in the photo. Is this a BVM, like from Yampol?
                1. 0
                  29 March 2023 22: 57
                  Quote: Repellent
                  By the way - not T80U in the photo. Is this a BVM, like from Yampol?

                  No, this is a T-80U. Here he is in front. Pay attention to the smoke grenade launchers. In the T-80BVM, they are located differently. Roman, you are a tanker in the past, how come.
                  1. 0
                    29 March 2023 23: 07
                    Quote: ZhEK-Vodogrey
                    You are a tanker in the past, how come

                    That was a long time ago. And there were tanks - T64B. These are the ones I know. And I only see eighties in pictures request

                    Okay, convinced. Kantemirovsky - so Kantemirovsky. But the apricots drew leaves on it, and by hand. No stencil laughing
                    1. 0
                      29 March 2023 23: 18
                      Quote: Repellent
                      And there were tanks - T64B.

                      By the way, Khinzirs began to pick them up from storage. Judging by the quad smoke grenade launchers.
      3. 0
        31 March 2023 19: 19
        Strange, last year, even on burned-out tanks, a tactical sign was sticking out, almost as an obligation, but here it’s not burned, but Z or O is not visible ...
  4. -1
    29 March 2023 20: 24
    The famous Turkish Bayraktars are almost never used anymore, because they fall like ducks.
  5. -6
    29 March 2023 20: 34
    And how did he fly so far to the center of Crimea?
    There, even before 2021, there were more air defense stations stuck along the coast than mushrooms?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"