Military correspondents reported the destruction of Western-made tanks in an "inconspicuous hangar" in the Zaporozhye region

100
Military correspondents reported the destruction of Western-made tanks in an "inconspicuous hangar" in the Zaporozhye region

In the area of ​​the city of Zaporozhye, which is still controlled by Ukrainian forces, on the night of March 29, Tanks Western production. This is reported by the Telegram channel "Reporter Rudenko V".

According to military correspondents, foreign-made tanks were located in "one inconspicuous hangar" not far from Zaporozhye. Eyewitnesses first saw how tanks were driven into the hangar, clearly foreign-made. The hangar was then hit by a missile fired by the Russian armed forces.



The number of tanks that were in the hangar was about 10 units. As for their model, the eyewitnesses could not tell the military correspondent, since they do not understand foreign tanks at this level, according to the Telegram channel "Reporter Rudenko V».

However, it cannot be ruled out that these could be German-made Leopard tanks, which are now being transferred to the Armed Forces of Ukraine by a number of European states. Their number, promised by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, is several dozen units, while the British Challenger tanks should be delivered to Ukraine in the amount of only 14 units.

The Russian leadership has long warned the Kiev regime and NATO countries that any Western-made military equipment and weapons that end up on the territory of Ukraine become a legitimate target for strikes by Russian troops.

The supply of Western weapons, according to the Russian Foreign Ministry, only contributes to the further escalation of the conflict, and by no means brings it closer to a peaceful settlement. But Western countries do not accept this argument of the Russian leadership and continue to transfer weapons and equipment to Ukraine in large quantities, increasing the volume of deliveries.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

100 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    29 March 2023 10: 36
    Eyewitnesses first saw how tanks were driven into the hangar, clearly foreign-made. The hangar was then hit by a missile fired by the Russian armed forces.

    Great, it's best when they don't get to the front. One day the West will get bored.
    1. -28
      29 March 2023 10: 44
      Foreign-made tanks, possibly Polish T-72s. One military commander saw, but it was dark. The hangar was destroyed by the SU-25 from the cabriolet.
      1. +22
        29 March 2023 10: 56
        Allow me to doubt .... There is no such crap in the Su-25's arsenal to destroy a hangar with 10 tanks, let alone accuracy from a pitch-up ... lol
        1. +19
          29 March 2023 10: 59
          Sarcasm...you know lol .... And on the topic, if you hit the "inconspicuous" hangar with 10 yu, even Polish T72 ... that's good
          1. +5
            29 March 2023 13: 41
            t-72, even Polish, production of the USSR or Russia. and there - foreign. well, obviously not the T-72 and similar
            1. +2
              30 March 2023 10: 42
              They promised 10 million rubles. premium for a foreign tank. We are waiting for someone to get the prize, and before that we are looking for where they hid the rest. Here the girls of the Black Sea Fleet who destroyed the marine drone were shown to everyone and awarded, though they didn’t say anything about bonuses. I would give, but I don't have that much... request
              1. -2
                April 2 2023 16: 21
                Kuzhugetovich announced the bonus. I think they won’t give me 10 lyam, but any bonus for good work is nice.
        2. +4
          29 March 2023 11: 03
          Quote: novel xnumx
          There is no such crap in the Su-25 arsenal to destroy a hangar with 10 tanks,

          NAR S-24, the missile has been mass-produced since 1960. Weight reaches 235 kg with a warhead mass of 123 kg. Actively used in NWO.


          1. +13
            29 March 2023 11: 17
            It's funny, an unguided rocket fired from a pitch-up hits exactly in the hangar and destroys all tanks with its 100 kg. enchanting
            1. +1
              29 March 2023 11: 19
              Quote: novel xnumx
              It's funny, an unguided rocket fired from a pitch-up hits exactly in the hangar and destroys all tanks with its 100 kg.

              That's how military officers work. Kizlyar knives will not sell themselves.
              "Grandfather at the appointment with a sex therapist:
              - Doctor, more than 3 times a week with my wife does not work.
              - Grandfather, how old are you?
              - 75.
              - Grandfather, well this is excellent!
              - Yes? And my neighbor says that with his wife every day, and he is 85!
              "Well, that's what you say!"
            2. +8
              29 March 2023 13: 53
              Quote: novel xnumx
              It's funny, an unguided rocket fired from a pitch-up hits exactly in the hangar and destroys all tanks with its 100 kg. enchanting

              Well, the military correspondents lied a little, because it was true that the hangar in which there were 10 tanks was destroyed. But the tanks most likely did not suffer.
              1. +3
                30 March 2023 08: 23
                But the tanks most likely did not suffer
                Perhaps they were hurt. The question is how critical
              2. 0
                31 March 2023 12: 12
                For a tank, even barrel deflection is already critical
            3. +2
              30 March 2023 08: 25
              And a semi-ton, also from a cabling - will it do? In terms of accuracy, and in terms of danger to the carrier, there is not much difference.
              1. +2
                30 March 2023 11: 11
                Wrong! The bomb doesn't fly far and deflections are minimal, pure ballistics, easy to calculate. The missile flies for a long range, and the dispersion is very large, in fact, you can only get somewhere by accident. Yes, and half-ton, not necessarily exactly on target, enough and nearby
                1. -1
                  30 March 2023 19: 22
                  Did you go to school in the 90s?
                  The bomb flies where it needs to along an unpredictable trajectory up to 250 km.
                2. 0
                  31 March 2023 08: 04
                  Unfortunately, the manufacturing quality of the bombs leaves much to be desired, and some points were originally laid down in the design, apparently the attitude has been from the moment of design - simpler, cheaper to manufacture, this is not a rocket, throw them in bulk anyway.

                  There was one shameful video from Syria, they did not hesitate to show it on all news channels, which clearly shows, moreover, shooting from the side and from the carrier, how out of a dozen bombs, immediately after being dropped, three begin to hang out in the oncoming stream and lag behind the rest.
                  Maybe this is, of course, such a correction, and this trio was supposed to visit another target, but not be corrected under the belly of the aircraft?
      2. +4
        29 March 2023 10: 57
        Quote: ZhEK-Vodogrey
        Foreign-made tanks, possibly Polish T-72s

        Or Slovak T-55s
        Quote: ZhEK-Vodogrey
        The hangar was destroyed by the SU-25 from the cabriolet.

        Well, that would be completely "curly" ... I don't think they have Western tanks in such close proximity now ...
        As for their model, the eyewitnesses could not tell the military commander, since they do not understand foreign tanks at this level
        For the SBU, work has been added ...
        1. +2
          29 March 2023 12: 47
          Quote: svp67
          I don’t think they have Western tanks in such proximity now ...


          And if they are going to attack, then where to place them? The hangar is inconspicuous.
          1. +2
            29 March 2023 13: 47
            Yes, there are many such places. "Selkhoztekhnika", motor depots, first floors of abandoned buildings.
            1. +6
              29 March 2023 14: 08
              The Armed Forces of Ukraine love to drive tanks and other armored vehicles into the granaries.
              And the fact that people did not distinguish the type of tank is not surprising. It might as well have been women. They see a larger than usual size and a square tower - it’s immediately clear that it’s not ours.
              1. +1
                29 March 2023 17: 40
                Green and on tracks? Tank!
                And there could be anything in fact.
                1. +1
                  29 March 2023 21: 02
                  Quote from Pablo Blade
                  And there could be anything in fact.

                  Even women in Ukraine will not confuse a tank with a bulldozer. But they have a mindset and a different type of memory than a man, and they do not remember the names of armored vehicles or anything else military. But they have a good visual memory. I did not just write about this - from experience. So it was in 2014 that the presence of Apache helicopters was revealed - a couple of leading questions and it immediately becomes clear what they saw. You can also show a picture.
      3. +1
        31 March 2023 12: 33
        Quote: ZhEK-Vodogrey
        Hangar destroyed by SU-25 from cabriolet

        From the cabling, if something can be destroyed, then this is only the released ammunition ...
    2. +6
      29 March 2023 11: 55
      It would be nice to have at least some kind of picture, otherwise it all looks like a story with the mass destruction of the Highmars or the Bradley infantry fighting vehicles destroyed by Konashenkov even in September 2022.
      Or it may be that eyewitnesses leaked information on the instructions of the SBU.
      In short, everything looks like a story with the Hymars
      1. +2
        30 March 2023 06: 39
        since the military correspondents wrote, it means our man doesn’t lie, then he won’t lie to us)) as soon as I accidentally look at the news, I’m immediately filled with pride for our army, aviation and in some places the fleet, although the latter doesn’t particularly flash in the picture, read the truth in it one truth and write
  2. +7
    29 March 2023 10: 36
    If everything is as written, then it's just wonderful! good Finally got ahead of the curve!
  3. +9
    29 March 2023 10: 37
    In the area of ​​the city of Zaporozhye, which is still controlled by Ukrainian formations, Western-made tanks were destroyed on the night of March 29. This is reported by the Telegram channel "Reporter Rudenko V".
    I don't want to be happy. Let's wait for official confirmation. And then.!!!!!
    1. +1
      29 March 2023 13: 49
      Behind the personal signature of Zeli? &The text of your comment is too short and, in the opinion of the site administration, does not contain useful information."
  4. +1
    29 March 2023 10: 38
    Something similar to dezu. Some eyewitnesses saw but could not determine what kind of tanks.
    1. +3
      29 March 2023 10: 44
      if a person does not understand, how can he determine what kind of tanks? given that even journalists confuse t72 with 80
      1. +3
        29 March 2023 13: 52
        T-55, T-62, T-72 and so on up to T-90 are all about the same. One school and look the same. Of course, if you put it next to each other, the differences will be very noticeable, but from afar, and also a hung tank, they will be the same.
        But challengers and leopolds are completely different, they all have square towers.
        I think this was exactly what was meant, but what kind of miracle is this rocket that hit 10 tanks at once.
        I think it would be more correct to write that the hangar was struck in which there were at least 10 tanks. For the tanks there are most likely intact.
        1. +2
          29 March 2023 14: 30
          For the tanks there are most likely intact.
          is not a fact. depending on what is covered. whether there was a fire or detonation of the BC. in any case, the personnel are kirdyk. especially those who were outside the tank, no?
      2. -1
        29 March 2023 14: 22
        it's all true, but it's already much easier to distinguish the T-64 from the leopard-2 or abrams. unless of course the witness is blonde. as for the results ... if objectively, it is premature to talk about the results now. too little known data. could destroy or only damage. the same goes for crews. depending on what they covered and what kind of hangar.
      3. +1
        29 March 2023 17: 33
        if a person does not understand, how can he determine what kind of tanks?

        Nevertheless, it was said that it was that these were tanks supplied by the West.
    2. +6
      29 March 2023 10: 45
      Agree. Sounds like a grandmother said...
      1. 0
        29 March 2023 13: 57
        A film crew does not follow every eyewitness. Well, lay out, let's say he blurry video of a night fire. Well, some hangar is on fire, but what is there? Either the wreckage of Soviet harvesters, or tanks, or rotten containers for vegetables. Shout out and demand 4k. Well, who will give you such proofs. War. I believe - I do not believe, that's all the proofs.
  5. LMN
    +1
    29 March 2023 10: 38
    It is clear that it is possible fake.
    But if it turns out to be true, it will be funny)))
  6. -5
    29 March 2023 10: 39
    Western-made tanks destroyed

    Are these the two "leopards" whose presence the 404 media were so happy about?
    Why are there more of them? Dragged along secret paths at night?
    Well, okay, all the secret becomes clear.
    1. -2
      29 March 2023 14: 00
      Dismantled and transported on donkeys, as in Afghanistan
  7. -1
    29 March 2023 10: 40
    God bless if it's true.
    Eyewitnesses first saw

    T.K. the satellite constellation of the VKS is very dead, then 99,99% that one of the "eyewitnesses" gave a tip. Glory to the hero of Ukraine!
    The case of Ivan Kudri and Vladimir Grubnik lives on.
    1. +3
      29 March 2023 11: 16
      Quote: Rumata
      T.K. the satellite constellation of the videoconferencing is very dead, then 99,99%

      Everything is simple here. Before and after. 2021 3 military launches. In 2022, 13 military launches took place. 2023. So far 1 of the planned 6 ti.
      So the cosmos fixes the movement. Earth makes additional reconnaissance further volley
  8. -10
    29 March 2023 10: 41
    Eyewitnesses first saw how tanks were driven into the hangar, clearly foreign-made. The hangar was then hit by a missile fired by the Russian armed forces.

    Well done eyewitnesses!
    Reward everyone for timely and accurate information.
  9. +7
    29 March 2023 10: 42
    What rocket can destroy 10 tanks? If X-22, but stood in a heap, then maybe.
    1. 0
      29 March 2023 10: 54
      if ammunition was detonated during the explosion, then this will be enough to disable nearby standing cars.
    2. +4
      29 March 2023 10: 58
      Yes, and a caliber with its 500 kg, although, of course, so that they destroy everything at once ..
    3. 0
      29 March 2023 14: 02
      There was a fire and all that. Allegedly
    4. 0
      30 March 2023 05: 38
      And how could they still stand from the hangar, an explosion in an enclosed space, if not completely destroyed, then definitely seriously damaged the cars.
    5. 0
      30 March 2023 15: 51
      Not which rocket, but which tanks. If these are French wheeled tin cans, misunderstood called "tanks", then they can be "soaked" and more.
  10. -1
    29 March 2023 10: 42
    if true, then very good information .... intelligence has really taken a step forward given the previous period.
  11. -2
    29 March 2023 10: 43
    It's such a thing, it's hard to believe without a movie. It happens that it does not happen, but it seemed. For girls, for example, that an infantry fighting vehicle that a tractor is all a tank
  12. +4
    29 March 2023 10: 43
    The supply of Western weapons, according to the Russian Foreign Ministry, only contributes to the further escalation of the conflict, and by no means brings it closer to a peaceful settlement. But Western countries do not accept this argument of the Russian leadership and continue to transfer weapons and equipment to Ukraine in large quantities, increasing the volume of deliveries.

    And why should the West accept this argument from Russia?
    Everyone probably remembers childhood, and if you start a fight, and then you see that you can’t cope ... What are you doing? Or give up or tick! And if you give up, then they will hang you still!
    So here too! Started a fight, no back, let alone negotiations! They just won't talk to you!
  13. +2
    29 March 2023 10: 45
    on the night of March 29, Western-made tanks were destroyed.
    And perhaps the Challengers, one of which Reznik rode yesterday and admired him. It's great when the enemy's equipment does not reach the front.
    1. +3
      29 March 2023 11: 06
      Quote: rotmistr60
      And perhaps the Challengers, one of which Reznik rode yesterday and admired him.

      It would be nice to destroy at least one Challenger, but together with Reznik.
  14. +3
    29 March 2023 10: 46
    And how many tanks can be damaged if one missile is fired? Still, tanks are iron boxes. From above, attachments and the engine are vulnerable. Everything else is iron.
    1. +3
      29 March 2023 10: 49
      Quote from maximace
      Still, tanks are iron boxes

      Yeah. Try throwing a tank into a fire, then share your impressions.

      In order for the car to go for overhaul, it is enough to burn the wiring. At least in places Yes
      1. +3
        29 March 2023 11: 00
        Good idea - on tanks with napalm ?! Hey Teska! hi
    2. +7
      29 March 2023 11: 38
      Quote from maximace
      From above, attachments and the engine are vulnerable. Everything else is iron.

      Well, more rubber bands. That is a complete replacement.
      Total. Complete replacement of external equipment with wiring, complete replacement of all rollers, replacement of the engine. Instead of a counteroffensive, the tanks go back to Germany for repairs. They didn't even take part in the fighting. Also good
    3. 0
      29 March 2023 14: 06
      Well, what is it good for, being not on the move and without electronics? Just dig into the ground and shoot at a line-of-sight distance.
  15. +1
    29 March 2023 10: 46
    God forbid that this be true. One rocket -10 tanks? And someone because of these tanks in the west had to endure the humiliation of a self-propelled Joe.
  16. -2
    29 March 2023 10: 50
    Reminds me of the story of one warrior from the Armed Forces of Ukraine, who said that "It is very easy to destroy Armata, we jumped on the tank turret and threw grenades into the hatch."
    Here is the same story :)
    1. -2
      29 March 2023 14: 08
      Did they (Armata) generally reach the front, or are they standing in the Moscow region for a parade?
  17. -5
    29 March 2023 10: 51
    The hangar was then hit by a missile fired by the Russian armed forces.

    And now just trying to turn on the head. What kind of missile could it be and how many tanks could it destroy? The source writes that up to 10 pcs. How??? Caliber? Iskander? Well, one rocket cannot destroy 10 tanks. Physically.
    1. +7
      29 March 2023 11: 01
      Explosion of ammunition and fire can be secondary damaging factors
    2. -2
      29 March 2023 14: 13
      "Before" is a tricky thing. It means "from 0 to 10". That you all, like naive children, clung to the fact that there were ten of them, tanks? Maybe they actually drove through this hangar and left from there? And you break all the spears "how and with what, but could you?".
  18. -1
    29 March 2023 10: 57
    To tell the truth, the news is so-so. We will not wait for confirmation, the Ukrainians will classify it, the Russians will not be able to prove it, foreign territory.
    The fact that the locals could not identify what kind of equipment was clear here, if women saw it, and men too, not everyone understands military equipment. For many, what is with a gun is a tank.
  19. -5
    29 March 2023 10: 59
    Quote: novel xnumx
    Allow me to doubt .... There is no such crap in the Su-25's arsenal to destroy a hangar with 10 tanks, let alone accuracy from a pitch-up ... lol

    Have you heard about weapons based on new physical principles?
    1. 0
      29 March 2023 11: 19
      weapons on new physical principles have not heard?

      Electronic explosives??
      1. 0
        30 March 2023 02: 42
        Digital, even probably online network, mows down not only tanks when hit, but also countless infantry through Internet connections and publication of materials.
    2. +1
      29 March 2023 14: 17
      I dare to correct our Commander-in-Chief, for a hundred years now "new physical principles" have not been discovered. Everything that people use, from a hoe to a thermonuclear bomb, works for the "old" principai.
  20. +4
    29 March 2023 11: 00
    After reading the comments...
    No ... well, did it lift your spirits?
    We've been waiting for good news.
    1. -2
      29 March 2023 14: 21
      It would be nice, in addition to victorious reports, real victories. And with them it's sour, even Bakhmut gradually fades into the shadows. The offensive fizzled out.
  21. +1
    29 March 2023 11: 04
    Everything is beautiful, but so far without confirmation. Information of the OBS Agency (one grandmother said), I want to believe in the good.
    Someone heard something, someone saw something, and an inconspicuous hangar could be set on fire by a specialist and "reported" that the tanks burned down there, as many as 100 pieces.
    Huge, black with cracks....
    1. -2
      29 March 2023 14: 22
      Yes. Shot down from slabs and furniture chipboard.
  22. -3
    29 March 2023 11: 13
    Just don’t tell Konoshenkov about tanks until the result of the strike is confirmed. bully
    1. -3
      29 March 2023 14: 29
      What are you?! Not to life! "The text of your comment is too short and, according to the site administration, does not contain useful information."
  23. +2
    29 March 2023 11: 45
    I believe that this information should be treated with caution until it is actually confirmed. There may well be some kind of uplifting stuffing.
  24. 0
    29 March 2023 12: 05
    If this is true, then great news. But I'm sure it's bullshit.
  25. -4
    29 March 2023 12: 05
    The very fact of the destruction of the equipment of the fascist-dill gangs. formations, already good news. What and how is no longer interesting, the main thing is that they will not be at the front. The fact that equipment and personnel are destroyed on the way is encouraging. But the places of concentration, barracks, storage, are still in question. And this is a factor that DRGs do not work in the depths, as before we are blowing the tune about the civilian population, loyal, fraternal (but rather bl...skoe) does not stop. This is bad and alarming that our propaganda is marking time.
    1. -1
      29 March 2023 14: 24
      "Peaceful population" yes, yes. Two Ukrainians are a partisan detachment, one of them is a traitor.
  26. -5
    29 March 2023 12: 48
    One rocket for ten tanks? And did they get hurt badly?
    1. +2
      29 March 2023 13: 05
      Quote: kakvastam
      One rocket for ten tanks? And did they get hurt badly?

      Well, if you smear the rocket evenly over the tanks, it probably won't scratch it very much.

      But if this rocket sets up, for example, a suitable fire in the shed where the tanks are, the tanks can get very sick ...
      1. -1
        29 March 2023 13: 34
        Did she arrange? News without any confirmation is not credible.
    2. -1
      29 March 2023 14: 26
      Not ten, but "UP TO TEN", that is, from zero.
  27. 0
    29 March 2023 13: 11
    I want to draw attention to the very fact of placement in this direction. We are waiting for events.
  28. +1
    29 March 2023 14: 07
    * Or maybe not, or maybe yes, or maybe it's all words * or * what is your evidence *?
  29. 0
    29 March 2023 15: 43
    Quote: novel xnumx
    weapons on new physical principles have not heard?

    Electronic explosives??

    This is a military secret, but it is likely that it is based on antimatter
  30. 0
    29 March 2023 17: 49
    Wie hoch war noch gleich die Belohnung fur jeden
    erlegten, deutschen "Leoparden"...?!? laughing laughing
  31. 0
    29 March 2023 18: 17
    Excellent guys! It's already GOOD!!! Only this way and nothing else! Beat Bandera and the NATO equipment supplied by them !!! am angry angry
  32. +2
    30 March 2023 01: 26
    Well, confusing Western tanks with ours is quite difficult. Painfully characteristic differences! Let's believe that this is true.
    1. 0
      31 March 2023 02: 17
      Well, someone wrote, (women saw a larger size, but with a square head.
      It is immediately clear that it is not ours.)
      Women know about sizes. laughing laughing laughing .
  33. 0
    30 March 2023 01: 35
    Rocketeers will not receive a bonus - there is no objective control.
  34. +2
    30 March 2023 04: 56
    It is possible to argue which tanks and how many were destroyed in the hangar ad infinitum. One thing is clear and undeniable. The hunt for Western tanks in Ukraine has begun and, of course, they will be destroyed, as soon as they are discovered, on a priority basis.
  35. 0
    30 March 2023 07: 06
    Hello everyone on the site. Unfortunately, the site is turning into a club to chat about something. We saw it well, but who, only guesswork. And everyone believes unverified data. Yes, there are a dime a dozen similar sites on the Ruin. If there was such a thing, then the two-star tweeted with might and main. The destruction of one particular one was necessarily present in the reports. Just a rumor. and it can't be true. So it goes
  36. 0
    30 March 2023 09: 09
    OBS-style news, one grandmother said .....
  37. +1
    30 March 2023 11: 04
    Maybe stop lying? According to the text, the hangar was destroyed, and no one knows what happened to the tanks. Nevertheless, they claim that they are all destroyed! No matter how we hit somewhere, everything is certainly destroyed, just damage is ruled out. It doesn't happen!
  38. -1
    30 March 2023 22: 47
    Any train or plane carrying Western weapons is a legitimate target. And we are all wet.
  39. 0
    31 March 2023 07: 57
    All this, of course, is great, but there are no fools and smart people, no matter what we want here ... The military commissar also did not stand nearby, and he also has the task of highlighting victories and obscuring our mistakes. And it’s sad that we don’t have hit fixes, maybe this is from a series of “destroyed” Hymers? We ended up in a hangar, which allegedly contained foreign tanks. The hangar keywords were... but maybe there was nothing there already, or the layouts were inflated... Wishful thinking!
  40. 0
    31 March 2023 20: 23
    Apart from Rudenko, not a single military commander has voiced this information. By the way, he already deleted it. This kind of thing often happens to him, he is an unauthoritative source.
  41. 0
    April 2 2023 09: 17
    A missile hitting a hangar does not mean the destruction of the tanks inside

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"