Ivan Susanin - patriot of the Russian land

63
Ivan Susanin - patriot of the Russian land
Konstantin Makovsky. Ivan Susanin. 1914


Ivan Susanin


The name of one of the Russian heroes is overgrown with legends and myths, the researchers who raised this topic have created a number of versions that contradict each other.



According to the official version, which also included the mythology of the Romanov royal dynasty, in the winter-spring of 1613, the newly elected sovereign Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov and his mother, nun Marfa Romanova, were in the patrimonial village of Domnino, Kostroma district. A Polish detachment headed here to kill or capture the Russian Tsar. From the point of view of the Polish lords, the legitimate sovereign of Russia was Prince Vladislav (he wore the crown of "Muscovites" until 1634).

As a conductor, the Poles captured a peasant (in a different interpretation, a clerk, an patrimonial headman) Ivan Susanin. He drew the enemies to another place and, with the help of his son-in-law Bogdan Sabinin, warned the Romanovs, who hid in the Ipatiev Monastery. The gentry, realizing that they had been deceived, tortured and killed the hero. The place of death of Ivan Susanin is considered to be the village of Isupovo or Isupovskoye swamp.

Historians argue about the time of the feat: late autumn - winter of 1612, winter - early spring of 1613. Almost nothing is known about Susanin's life. It was a simple peasant or patrimonial headman, as he was associated with the Romanovs. Did he know about the election of Michael as king, or was it still a contender for the throne; whether he knew about the real whereabouts of the Romanovs. Were the Romanovs really in Domnino, or somewhere nearby, or were they not there? The true place of Susanin's death, his grave, is also unknown. There are many questions.

Creation of the official myth of the Romanovs


Proof of the reality of the feat of Ivan Susanin is considered to be a letter of commendation dated November 30 (December 10), 1619, granting Susanin's son-in-law Bogdan Sobinin half the village with "whitewashing" from all taxes and duties "for service to us and for blood, and for patience ...". This charter was repeatedly confirmed: charters of 1633 and 1644 (“To the widow of Sabinin Antonida with children”), a confirmation letter of 1691 (to the descendants of Susanin, who lived in the village of Korobova, “and their children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren, and in their family forever ”), preferential decrees of 1723, 1724 and 1731, confirmation letters of 1741 and 1767 (“to all the descendants of Susanin who lived in the village of Korobova”). The last document dates back to 1837 ("Korobovski Belopashtsam").

The visit of Catherine II to Kostroma in 1767 marked the beginning of an official tradition: to mention Susanin as the savior of Mikhail Romanov. In the "Dictionary of the Geographical Russian State" by A. M. Shchekatov (1804), Susanin appears as the savior of the royal person. In 1812, the writer S. N. Glinka directly elevated Susanin to the ideal of national prowess and self-sacrifice.

This tradition was strengthened during the reign of Nicholas I, when the ideology was carried out - Orthodoxy, autocracy and nationality. Also at this time, the confrontation broke out again along the line Russia - Poland (uprising in the Kingdom of Poland). The composer Mikhail Glinka's opera A Life for the Tsar was released. A monument was erected to the hero in Kostroma - 1851, sculptor V. I. Demut-Malinovsky. Ivan Susanin is depicted on the Millennium of Russia monument in Novgorod.

It is worth noting that the myth was preserved in the USSR. At the first, revolutionary stage, when the revolutionaries destroyed all the "remnants of tsarism", the monument to Ivan Susanin in Kostroma was destroyed. But then, when Stalin began to restore full-fledged state institutions, including history, Ivan Susanin was returned to the camp of folk heroes. But with an emphasis on the patriotism of a common man, when the salvation of the king might not even be mentioned.

In the USSR in 1939, a new "Stalinist" edition of Glinka's famous opera was released, based on the libretto of the poet Sergei Gorodetsky. The plot was heavily edited: new characters appeared in the opera in the person of Minin and Pozharsky. King Sigismund sends a detachment to defeat the Russian militia. The army ends up near Kostroma, in the village where the peasant Ivan Susanin lives. The Poles demand that he show them the way to Minin's camp.

The fact that Susanin saved Tsar Mikhail Fedorovich, who was in a monastery near Kostroma, was not mentioned in the new edition. Moreover, in the text of the libretto there was no mention of Romanov at all. At the direction of Stalin, the opera became known as Ivan Susanin. With such a plot and title, the work was performed on all the opera stages of the Soviet Union. That is, the legend was given a national character.


In 1835, by decree of Tsar Nicholas I, the central square of Kostroma was renamed from Ekaterinoslavskaya to Susaninskaya. On March 14, 1851, a monument designed by Academician V.I. Demut-Malinovsky was erected in its center: a granite column on a quadrangular pedestal was crowned with a bust of the young king, on whose chest a gilded cross stood out brightly. At the base of the column was the kneeling figure of Susanin, to the left of which lay two letters of commendation to his offspring. On the back side of the pedestal there is an inscription: “To Ivan Susanin, for the Tsar, the savior of faith and the kingdom, who laid down his life. Grateful offspring.

Poetry and reality


Even before the revolution, researchers noted that there are no folk legends about Ivan Susanin, they are all bookish in nature. Therefore, the famous pre-revolutionary historian Nikolai Kostomarov, who studied this topic, called the whole history of the feat an "anecdote", which "has become a more or less generally recognized fact."

Kostomarov:

“Susanin’s suffering is an incident, in itself very common at that time. Then the Cossacks roamed the villages and burned and tortured the peasants. It could be that the robbers who attacked Susanin were the same kind of thieves, and the event, so loudly glorified later, was one of many that year. After some time, Susanin's son-in-law took advantage of him and begged for a white paper.

That is, Susanin could well have been a victim not of the Poles, but of Russian thieves (as the robbers were then called).

A prominent Russian historian, one of the founders of the classical history of Russia, Sergei Solovyov also noted that Susanin could have been tortured not by Poles and Lithuanians, but by Russian robbers, Cossacks. Historians did not note large Polish detachments in the winter of 1612–1613. in the Kostroma region. But small gangs of thieves' Cossacks roamed everywhere.

The first Romanovs liked the fairy tale, and they gave a letter and money, confirming the legend. Further court clerics, writers, poets, artists and composers developed the idea. In particular, Glinka figured out how a whole regiment of Poles died in the forest from hunger and cold. In fact, the Polish garrison was literally dying of hunger, they even ate each other, but not in the forest, but in the Moscow Kremlin, where they were let in by the Moscow boyars (including the Romanovs).

At present, apparently, the Stalinist edition of reading the feat of Ivan Susanin should be considered the closest. She is folk. A simple person makes self-sacrifice in the name of the Motherland and the people. It is on such Ivans that the Russian land stands. The rest is poetry.


Monument to Susanin in Kostroma. The 12-meter monument was built according to the design of the Moscow sculptor N. A. Lavinsky and architects Markovsky and Bubnov in 1967.
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. +20
      30 March 2023 05: 35
      - Where are you taking us, Susanin-hero?
      - Go fuck yourself, I'm here for the first time.
      1. +17
        30 March 2023 07: 23
        Reconstruction of appearance. Ivan Susanin on the skull (Russian forensic expert Professor Viktor Zvyagin).

        “Injuries,” the expert wrote, “having no signs of healing, indicate a violent death and fully correspond to the circumstances of the martyrdom of Ivan Susanin. Appearance signs of a man from reliquary 13A of the Isupovo necropolis are present in the guise of reliably known descendants of Ivan Susanin in the 8th-15th generations.

        So here he is, a folk hero! Even now, under glass in the museum, exhibit and drive sightseers. “Tourist groups from Poland,” as the funniest anecdote of the Susan cycle says, “discount.”
        1. +6
          30 March 2023 07: 47
          Quote: not the one
          So here he is, a folk hero!

          This reconstructed image reminds me of someone ... Beard, however, is not the same.
          Reconstruction, by chance, not F.E. Dzerzhinsky led?
        2. +11
          30 March 2023 08: 08
          Volodya Lenin? You?!
          ____________
          1. 0
            30 March 2023 09: 59
            An interesting document. I'll quote it in full:
            Annotation of the results of archaeological and forensic medical research on the identification of the remains of Ivan Susanin
            The personality of Ivan Susanin and the circumstances of his feat have been shrouded in a veil of uncertainty until recently. The latter was the result of a narrow source base that tells about the feat of Ivan Susanin, which served as the basis for various interpretations of the circumstances of his feat and even the expression of doubts about the reality of the events associated with the rescue of Mikhail Romanov by a Kostroma peasant.
            On the other hand, if the feat of Ivan Susanin took place, it became one of the determining factors in the revival of Russian statehood at the beginning of the 2001th century. and out of the confusion. At present, in the conditions of Russia's movement along the path of reforms, the growing interest in its historical roots, it turned out to be impossible to measure with the ambiguity of our knowledge about Ivan Susanin and his feat. In order to solve the problem of the reality of the feat of the Kostroma patriot and to reveal its circumstances, the administration of the Kostroma region in XNUMX approved the Program for the study of memorable places associated with the name of Ivan Susanin. This Program pursued the following goals:
            1. based on the study of historical evidence, determine the proposed burial place of Ivan Susanin;
            2. conduct archaeological excavations at the necropolis;
            3. to identify from the group of burials of the buried, corresponding to the time and parameters of Ivan Susanin, namely: burials of the beginning of the 40th century, related to men, over XNUMX years old, with traces of violent death;
            4. to carry out the identification of the revealed remains and their possible belonging to Ivan Susanin using modern methods of forensic medicine.
            Prominent Russian experts were involved in the decision of the specified Program:
            1. Scientific management of archaeological research of memorial sites associated with the name of Ivan Susanin was carried out by Sergey Ivanovich Alekseev, consultant-chief archaeologist of the committee for the protection and use of the historical and cultural heritage of the administration of the Kostroma region;
            2. Archaeological research of the Isupov necropolis was carried out by Alexander Viktorovich Novikov, head of the Research and Restoration Center of the Regional State Institution “Heritage” of the Committee for the Protection and Use of the Historical and Cultural Heritage of the Administration of the Kostroma Region;
            3. Medico-forensic studies of the skeletons of the Isupovsky and Priskokovsky necropolises, a complex of field and cameral studies related to the identification of the bone remains of Ivan Susanin were carried out under the guidance of Zvyagin Viktor Nikolaevich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, winner of the First National Prize for the Best Doctors of Russia “Vocation”, Honored doctor of the Russian Federation;
            4. Paleoanthropological analysis of the skeletons of the Isupov necropolis was carried out by Vasiliev Sergey Vladimirovich, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Head of the Anthropology Department of the Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
            In 2001, the Committee for the Protection and Use of the Historical and Cultural Heritage of the Administration of the Kostroma Region, together with the OGU “Heritage”, began archaeological research of memorial sites associated with the name of Ivan Susanin. Archaeological research was carried out in the village of Derevenki (the residence of the son-in-law of I. Susanin Bogdan Sobinin), the village of Isupovo (where the estate of Xenia Shestova-Romanova (nun Martha) - the mother of Mikhail Romanov) was located), in the Isupovsky settlement (place of execution of Ivan Susanin), the Isupov necropolis (the burial place of Ivan Susanin), the Priskokovsky necropolis (the burial place of the descendants of Ivan Susanin from the middle of the XNUMXth century). In the course of historical and archival research, it was found out that Ivan Susanin was buried not in the village of Domnino or in the churchyard in Spas-Khripeli, but in the Isupovsky necropolis.
            The total research area of ​​the Isupov necropolis from 2002 to 2004 was about 327 sq. m. The total number of regular burials is 146, reburials 217, in total, the remains of about 400 individuals of the XNUMXth-XNUMXth centuries, buried according to Christian canons, were examined.
            The most numerous category of finds from the Isupov necropolis was made up of copper pectoral crosses, of which 288 specimens were found, as a rule, located on the chest of the buried. In addition to pectoral crosses, the accompanying material included buttons, beads, tears, and rings.
            Interest was aroused by a group of burials in the square. GD-1/2 of the 2002 excavation. In area D-1, a secondary burial (reburial 13a) was found, represented by a group of tubular bones and a cranium. On the last one, on the left side, there was a trace of a chopped wound, which led to a fatal outcome (the results of a pathological and anthropological analysis by Professor V.N. Zvyagin). The reburial did not contain dating finds, however, the results of stratigraphic observations make it possible to determine the time of its primary burial between the end of the XNUMXth and the middle of the XNUMXth centuries.
            A medical forensic analysis of the remains of reburial 13a was carried out by a group of forensic doctors headed by Professor V.N. Zvyagin. The skull belonged to a man aged 45–50 years with a body length of 164 ± 2 cm. Its appearance corresponds to the Eastern Baltic type, which is widespread in the Russian population. Representatives of this type are characterized by short stature, a dumpy figure, a broad head, a broad face with a massive lower jaw, a fairly wide slightly concave nose with a flat base, hard blond hair, light small eyes, fair skin (app. 3). Two chopped injuries of the left parietal-temporal region were found on the skull, penetrating into its cavity, with an extensive flake of bones due to their expansion (Appendix 2). In addition, a massive injury to the bones forming the bony nose was noted. This injury was caused by a blow with a blunt hard object (the butt of an ax, a leg in rough shoes, etc.).
            The analysis of the phenotype showed that the reconstructed appearance of a man from the reburial 13 a of the Isupov necropolis has common features of appearance with reliably known descendants of Ivan Susanin, belonging to the East Baltic anthropological type.
            The conducted forensic examination did not reveal any signs excluding the belonging of the bone remains from the reburial 13 a of the Isupov necropolis to Ivan Osipovich Susanin.
            On March 15, 2005, the results of archaeological and forensic research were introduced into scientific circulation and presented to the public as part of the work of the All-Russian scientific conference “Time of Troubles in the context of the formation of Russian statehood and the personality of Ivan Susanin: myths and reality”, which noted the high scientific level of the conducted works (Appendix 4).
            Appendix: 1. Extract from the “scientific report on the conducted archaeological and forensic research on the identification of the remains of Ivan Susanin: general conclusion — 1 page. In 1 copy.
            2. A copy of the photo of the chopped damage to the skull from the reliquary 13a - 1 sheet. V. 1 copy
            3. Portrait reconstruction (by V.N. Zvyagin) of the face of Ivan Susanin from the skull — 1 sheet. in 1 copy.
            4. Resolution of the All-Russian Scientific Conference “The Time of Troubles in the Context of the Formation of Russian Statehood and the Personality of Ivan Susanin: Myths and Reality” — 3 p. in 1 copy.

            Deputy Head of Department, Chief Archaeologist S.I. Alekseev
          2. +5
            30 March 2023 17: 46
            What if ... Ilyich is one of the descendants of Ivan Susanin?
            1. -1
              30 March 2023 21: 40
              Judging by the fact that in the paintings and pedestals, V.I. Lenin always shows us where we should go - this is quite possible.
        3. 0
          30 March 2023 09: 57
          Reconstruction of appearance. Ivan Susanin on the skull (forensic expert Professor Viktor Zvyagin).



          This is a reconstruction of the appearance of "Ivan Susanin". The bust is exhibited in the regional scientific library in Kostroma.

          In this case, there are no claims to the anthropologists and sculptors who performed the reconstruction. The problem is that the belonging of the skull, according to which the appearance of this man was restored, to Ivan Susanin, to put it mildly, is doubtful.
          1. 0
            30 March 2023 17: 14
            I beg your pardon, but: "has common features of appearance with the Reliably known streams of Ivan Susanin"
            It turns out the "left" skull, but similar to the descendants of Susanin? a little strange
            1. +1
              30 March 2023 18: 40
              How many centuries have passed since the death of Susanin until the reconstruction of his appearance according to his alleged skull? 3,5 centuries approximately? What reliable descendants could be preserved there? It's just that the reenactor unwittingly (or maybe quite consciously) adjusted Susanin's appearance to match the appearance of the people shown to him as "descendants".
        4. +4
          30 March 2023 14: 46
          This is another savior of the king.



          Osip Ivanovich Komissarov (Komisarov) (1838; the village of Molvitino, Buysky district, Kostroma province (now the village of Susanino, Susaninsky district, Kostroma region), Russian Empire - 1892; Poltava province, Russian Empire)
          In 1866, Osip Ivanovich already owned a hat workshop and some free time for walking. April 4, 1866, while at the fence of the Summer Garden, Komissarov noticed the royal carriage. He decided to see the king himself. Komissarov's curiosity was rewarded: the emperor hesitated near the carriage, putting on his overcoat. And at this time, Komissarov noticed a strange young man who squeezed through the crowd, pulling out a pistol. Courage and determination were enough for Komissarov to prevent the shooter (Karakozov) from shooting accurately.
          Delight from the act of Komissarov intensified when it became known that he was from Kostroma. Popular rumor instantly connected his name with the name of another Kostroma peasant - Ivan Susanin. Thanksgiving prayers were served in all churches, and in the evening Alexander the Liberator gave a solemn reception. to which Komissarov was invited. When Komissarov was brought into the Winter Palace, the emperor announced the promotion of Osip Ivanovich to hereditary nobles. Komissarov was awarded the Order of St. Vladimir IV degree and received an honorary prefix to the name "Kostroma".
          A chapel was built on the site of the assassination attempt, demolished in 1925

          1. 0
            30 March 2023 17: 24
            As I remember: Karakozov, shot several times.
            1. 0
              30 March 2023 19: 20
              You were there? smile
              It seems that he was not particularly allowed to shoot. According to standard information, one shot managed to be fired, and even that one was prevented. There was a crowd around.
            2. -1
              30 March 2023 21: 49
              Karakozov fired 3 bullets. See "The Daily Life of Russian Gendarmes"
              1. -1
                30 March 2023 23: 15
                Thank you Svyatoslav, live and learn and the book is interesting
                I looked there for the assassination attempt on April 4, 1866, but did not see information about three shots.
                Grigoriev Kolokolov "The Daily Life of Russian Gendarmes". Or am I reading the wrong book, or not there?
        5. +2
          30 March 2023 16: 50
          All the same, there was such a person and really accepted a martyr's death
      2. +12
        30 March 2023 07: 37
        Quote: not the one
        - Where are you taking us, Susanin-hero?
        - Go fuck yourself, I'm here for the first time.

        - Let's cut off Susanin's leg!
        - Don't, guys! I remembered the road!
        1. +11
          30 March 2023 08: 06
          Sometimes Susanin is compared with Moses - among the Jews, not a single man who left Egypt reached the Promised Land in 40 years.
          1. +1
            31 March 2023 10: 19
            there is a reason for this, they angered the One who lives in Heaven by disobeying him, that they did not go to war against the giants, then they wanted to destroy them all, but at the request of Moses, he took pity and said that until the generation was renewed, they would not enter the promised land. Moses did not enter it either, he only saw from the Mountain, but Joshua brought him into the promised land
        2. +2
          30 March 2023 17: 36
          Where are you leading to, you can't see a single thing?
          - I myself got lost in your brains powder.
          Let's cut off Susan's leg
          Well, you, I think I remembered the road.
      3. +2
        30 March 2023 17: 43
        Let's cut Susanin’s leg!
        - Wait! Wait! I remembered the road!
        1. 0
          31 March 2023 09: 46
          Quote: Ilya-spb
          Let's cut Susanin’s leg!
          - Wait! Wait! I remembered the road!

          It would be necessary to study the "anthropology" of this rhyme depending on the geography.
          Extreme western version.
          "Where are you taking us, Susanin hero?
          You go to the South, I myself am here for the first time!
          Let's cut Susanin’s leg!
          No need guys! I remembered the way."
  2. +15
    30 March 2023 05: 35
    famous pre-revolutionary historian Nikolai Kostomarov

    In the XNUMXth century, Kostomarov was famous as a falsifier of history, using dubious historical sources, not shunning outright falsification.
    Kostomarov, Ukrainian nationalist, Russophobe. Even during the life of Kostomarov, Russian historians stigmatized him for a blatant lie, but from him, like from any Ukrainian nationalist, like water off a duck's back. Kostomarov is on a par with such "giants of thought" as So'Lzhenitsyn, Shalamov, Rezun, Evgenia Albats, etc.
    Kostomarov is known primarily as the initiator of several Russophobic propaganda campaigns. So, for example, the historical discovery of Kostomarov is the depiction of a terrible picture of how, during the capture of Warsaw by Suvorov’s troops, the Cossacks raped and then killed Christian nuns, and dragged children dressed on peaks through the streets ... Of course, he wrote about this already when, due to old age, not one of Suvorov's miracle heroes could fill his face. In the West, this tale of Kostomarov came to court. The most favorite "horror" of the Kaiser's propaganda, which planted an atmosphere of Russophobia and anti-Slavic hysteria in Germany and Austria, was precisely the image of a Cossack with a baby impaled on a pike. After the First World War, the image of the bloody Cossack in Western propaganda was replaced by the image of the no less bloody Bolshevik. Today, this tale continues thanks to the provocations in Bucha and so on.
    Another "historical" discovery by Kostomarov is a detailed description of how all the fire equipment, leaving the wounded, who had no place in the convoy, and who allegedly died in the fire.
    The main argument of Kostomarov against Susanin sounds something like this: a Muscovite cannot be a hero by definition, therefore all Susanin's relatives are swindlers and beggars. According to Kostomarov, the thieves "hit" some peasant during the robbery of the village, and then his relatives made up fairy tales for the sake of royal alms. The fact that in fact the Polish army has nothing to do with Susanin's death allegedly works for this version. Kostomarov's logic is extremely simple: there were no Poles, there was no threat to the tsar. In reality, instead of the real story of N.N. Kostomarov subverts the libretto of Mikhail Ivanovich Glinka's opera A Life for the Tsar (Ivan Susanin, 1836). Let's not argue about the extent to which the libretto of the opera A Life for the Tsar is historical. The author of the libretto is Baron Yegor Rozen, an artist, he sees it that way.
    Judging by the statements of Kostomarov himself, the feat of Ivan Susanin has been hated by him since his school article. The most interesting thing is that Kostomarov considers the royal letter to the descendants of Susanin just the result of the intrigues of Bogdan Sobinov (the cunning son-in-law of Susanin swindled the naive tsar!). As evidence, Kostomarov points to inconsistencies in various documents of the XNUMXth century (!). Kostomarov's most lethal argument against the royal charter: [b] the complete absence of information about Susanin in foreign sources! [b] If Ivan Susanin is not revered in the West, then he did not exist. Voila!
    Apparently, the main drawback of the royal charter from the point of view of Kostomarov is that it absolutely does not allow for a double interpretation. For example, Susanin knew where the tsar was, but he was asked about something else, or Susanin was asked where the tsar was, but he himself did not know about it, or he was not asked about anything at all, but was simply killed, etc. However, Kostomarov managed to find fault even with this text (the tsar was in Kostroma, and Susanin in the Kostroma district - does not converge!). But, not being able to change the content of the charter in a big way, Kostomarov tries to discredit the very fact of its birth: “In a word, there is some kind of inconsistency here, something unclear, something implausible.” Well, Kostomarov does not like the royal charter and that's it!
    The question is, for the sake of what great idea N.N. Kostomarov needed not only to dispel the patriotic image of Ivan Susanin, but also to expose Bogdan Sobinov as a fraud? This is best said by Kostomarov himself. He concludes his study with the following paragraph:
    By chance, what our scribes invented about Susanin in the 1648th century actually happened in almost this form in the XNUMXth century at the opposite end of the Russian world, in Ukraine. When in May XNUMX Hetman Bogdan Khmelnitsky was chasing the Polish army, one South Russian peasant, Mikita Galagan, undertook to be the leader of the Polish army, deliberately led him into the swamp and forest slums and gave the Cossacks the opportunity to defeat their enemies. This heroic feat of selflessness differs from that of Susanin in that it actually took place.
    .
    This feat of the peasant Mikita Galagan Kostomarov cites from Little Russian chronicles, which, according to the unanimous and unquestioned opinion of historians of the XNUMXth century, were and are considered to be a “muddy source”. In them, even the date of the death of Bohdan Khmelnitsky is given with an error. Therefore, it would be doubly interesting to know if there is at least one foreign source that mentions the South Russian peasant Mikita Galagan? But Kostomarov is not at all embarrassed by such inconsistencies in his own work.
    About the excessively free treatment of N.N. Kostomarov with historical documents became known not today. For the first time, another famous historian of the 1862th century, S.M. Solovyov, who published in XNUMX in the newspaper Nashe Vremya the work “History and Modernity”, the fourth section of which is called “On the article by Mr. Kostomarov “Ivan Susanin”. And I must say that the arguments of S.M. Solovyov look much more convincing.
    In the article by V.E. Rudakov "Ivan Susanin" from the "Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Efron", 1890 - 1907 also refers to the groundlessness of Kostomarov's hypothesis. In this article, Rudakov writes that since the late 1870s and especially the 1880s, with the opening of historical societies and provincial archival commissions, new documents about Susanin's exploits began to be discovered. They opened up almost contemporary "Notes" and numerous handwritten "traditions" of the 1882th and XNUMXth centuries, in which the admiration of the writers for the feat of Susanin is obvious (others directly called him a martyr). In XNUMX, Samaryanov, who collected many sources that had not been published before him, managed to prove that the Poles and Lithuanians approached the village of Domnina in a detachment in order to kill the newly elected Tsar Mikhail Fedorovich, and that Mikhail Fedorovich “hid from the Poles” in the Ipatiev Monastery on the advice of Susanin from the village of Domnina, after the appearance of the Polish-Lithuanian detachment. The provisions of Samaryanov are also confirmed by later finds of documents related to Susanin and stored in the Kostroma archival commission, in the archaeological institute, etc. The essence of the legends about Susanin's feat is as follows. Shortly after his election to the throne, when Mikhail Fedorovich lived with his mother in the village of Domnino, his ancestral patrimony, Polish and Lithuanian people came to the Kostroma region in order to kill the new rival of the Polish prince Vladislav. Not far from the village of Domnina, they came across Susanin, who undertook to be their guide, but led him in the opposite direction, into dense forests, sending his son-in-law Bogdan Sobinov to Mikhail Fedorovich before leaving with advice to take refuge in the Ipatiev Monastery. In the morning he revealed his deceit to the Poles. Despite severe torture, Susanin did not give away the place of refuge of the king and was chopped up by the Poles "into small pieces."
    1. +20
      30 March 2023 05: 38
      Simply put - as he was a hero of the Russian land, he will remain a hero, despite all these different Kostomarovs.
      1. +20
        30 March 2023 06: 18
        Quote: not the one
        Simply put - as he was a hero of the Russian land, he will remain a hero, despite all these different Kostomarovs.

        +1500! And the opera is great. I wonder if it is still staged at the Bolshoi Theater or "out of court about a folk hero"?
        1. +6
          30 March 2023 07: 21
          or "not to court about the national hero"?
          Why the skepticism? It seems like it's time to promote heroism.
          1. +18
            30 March 2023 07: 28
            He has always been a hero to me.
            So this is what he is like, our Susanin Ivan;
            Let's raise a glass to Ivan!
        2. +14
          30 March 2023 07: 22
          I wonder if it is still staged at the Bolshoi Theater or "out of court about a folk hero"?
          Oh, Len, but I don’t know ... I don’t live in Moscow ... I would go with pleasure myself, there would be such an opportunity if ...
          1. +2
            30 March 2023 19: 43
            I would gladly go

            They put it, or they don't, but it still lives in the memory. smile
        3. +7
          30 March 2023 11: 20
          Please go to Saint Petersburg.
          St. Petersburg, Mariinsky Theater
          10 April
          Monday 19:00
          Life for the Tsar

          opera by Mikhail Glinka
          The performance is accompanied by synchronized Russian subtitles
          To the 150th anniversary of the birth of Fyodor Chaliapin
          Very "to the yard"
    2. +1
      30 March 2023 16: 54
      "Kostomarov's logic is simple" and quite suits the author
    3. +2
      30 March 2023 16: 59
      Samsonov claims that there were no Polish troops there
    4. +2
      30 March 2023 17: 51
      In the early 90s it was fashionable to read Archipelago, but I didn't read it. I had enough of "Matryona Dvor", the style is difficult and boringly written.
      Rezun? I only know Solzhenitsyn
      I even saw his autograph: "to the seeker of a new truth" (the mother-in-law has: "One day of Ivan Denisovich" in the magazine: "New World")
  3. +14
    30 March 2023 07: 52
    I think the Romanovs and their associates were well aware of Susanin's exploits. They were on the verge of death, and they remembered this escape to the monastery for a long time, therefore, Susanin's son-in-law was given benefits quickly enough, given the chaos and devastation of those years. Witnesses of this feat were alive and well.
    It is a pity that everything has turned into a joke in the minds of Russians ...
  4. +11
    30 March 2023 08: 01
    Opera by composer Mikhail Glinka "A Life for the Tsar"

  5. +9
    30 March 2023 08: 09
    I wonder: on whose side is Mr. author? In Polish???
  6. +11
    30 March 2023 08: 11
    All power to the Soviets!

    Be afraid to rewrite the history of grandfathers, they will not forgive you for this.

    In one neighboring country, the mess began with a revision of its history. Instead of some "myths" they created new ones. They demolished the old monuments, erected new ones... What this has led to, we all see on TV every day. Personally, I don't want this to happen again.
    1. +8
      30 March 2023 08: 33
      Yes, already, you understand ..... The Russians, as it were, killed Susanin ...... It is truly said that if you spit in the past, the answer will be from a cannon. NATO caliber 155 mm. Has already!
  7. +13
    30 March 2023 08: 45
    They constantly run into Susanin. The feat of a peasant peasant is haunted. No matter how different historians called him, pro ... ki. And a drunkard, and an embezzler, and a deceiver, or even a moron. Well, a man cannot be noble! did not come out! The author of the article writes that there are no folk legends (there are plenty of them), but there are a lot of papers. Do you need proof? It is naive to assume that Susanin did not understand what he was doing and why. He saved the dynasty and Russia. Almost 80 years of stagnation in Russia brought the country to the brink of disaster. although by that time Mikhail was not the king and had not yet given his consent). It was for this reason that the Poles and mercenaries scoured the entire district. They needed to eliminate the threat. The Poles understood that the God-chosen tsar was too tough for them. and there is a mutual rejection of peoples.
    The peasant is envious, probably in any country. Susanin was not particularly loved alive, after all, the headman was at that time a justice of the peace (a chicken, a cow, etc. didn’t go there), what can I say after the royal letters. They poured mud on him , and relatives. How, he is the same as us ... and suddenly the royal favorite. Envy and envy again.
    As for the feat itself ... From Domnino to Kostroma is about 100 km. Any delay of 6 hours and no one will catch up. The Ipatiev Monastery is also a fortress. nothing.
    Ivan Susanin is buried in the village of Isupovo. untouched were one leg and head, the rest was all chopped up with sabers.
  8. BAI
    +8
    30 March 2023 08: 55
    The Soviet monument is better than the royal one
    1. +8
      30 March 2023 09: 11
      There was no royal monument. It was a monument to the Romanov dynasty. It still stands in Central Park. Only instead of the tsar and Susanin, Lenin is on it. The column lies separately. The monument to Ivan Susanin is located in the city center with its back to the central square. , so that it would be visible from the Volga. And it turned out neither this nor that.
      1. +5
        30 March 2023 09: 22
        Quote: bortitrambler.ru
        Only instead of Susanin, Lenin is on him.

        To be honest, I don’t see any difference between them in relation to the Poles.
      2. Fat
        +6
        30 March 2023 11: 15
        Quote: bortitrambler.ru
        There was no royal monument. It was a monument to the Romanov dynasty. It still stands in Central Park. Only instead of the tsar and Susanin, Lenin is on it. The column lies separately. The monument to Ivan Susanin is located in the city center with its back to the central square. , so that it would be visible from the Volga. And it turned out neither this nor that.

        The monument to Susanin, designed by Demut-Malinovsky, stood on Susaninskaya Square (colloquially "frying pan")
        It stood from 1851 to 1918, a smaller copy now stands in front of the house of the ex-mayor of Kostroma Korobov, who dreamed of restoring the monument. Before the reconstruction of the square, the column lay for a long time on the "frying pan" between the bus and trolleybus stops. During the reconstruction of the square, they refused to restore the monument, the "historical column" was removed.
        Monument to the 300th anniversary of the Romanov dynasty. was located on the territory of the Kostroma Kremlin, the cathedral complex of which is now being restored. This is the territory of the TsPKO, Vladimir Ilyich is standing on a pedestal, with his back to the shopping arcade, pointing with his hand at the pre-trial detention center smile
        Initially, the committee for the construction of the monument "300th Anniversary of the Dynasty" chose the work of the sculptor AI Adamson. The monument was founded in 1911. The work was not completed due to the outbreak of war.
        Don't talk about things you don't really know. Sincerely.
        I live in Kostroma, so I know more to whom and where the monuments stood (sat and lay) wink
        1. +6
          30 March 2023 13: 27
          I'm not talking about where, something stood. There are a lot of photographs both in the museums of Kostroma and on the Internet. It is difficult to call a monument to Susanin, what stood on the "pan". the same as on the sculpture in honor of the 300th anniversary of the Romanovs. To be honest, I like the modern monument more. Just to a Russian peasant who gave his life for his Motherland. And all these crawls on their knees in front of the tsar humiliate the man and patriot Ivan Susanin.
  9. +3
    30 March 2023 09: 27
    the fact that in the Stalinist "edition" the opera from "For the Tsar" turned into the opera "Ivan Susanin" is not surprising, knowing that the Bolsheviks generally tried to present the history of Russia in such a way that the great Empire that they inherited, well, seemed to have fallen from heaven to earth, as if it should have been so and there is no merit in this. An anthology, a kaleidoscope and a chain of historical events about the exploits of the Tsars, the Tsar's power and its subjects, in order to create a Great Empire from the small Moscow Kingdom in a hundred years, the Bolsheviks and Communists tried to shamelessly hide all this, which happens with freeloaders ... So I already I'm not talking about what would happen to those who would ask the question - why
    Russians voluntarily on their own and for themselves without any party secretaries in ideology, for themselves came up with the cry-slogan "For the Tsar, for the Motherland, for the faith" and for these three symbols they went to death. So that no one would ask such questions, the first thing to do was to remove the words "For the Tsar." ..
    By the way, if today's academic community of historians does not deal a crushing blow to the falsifiers of history like Rezun-Svanidze, then in twenty years history will remain in Rezun style, as it once remained in Kastomarovsky style and poisoned people's minds for more than a hundred years
    1. +6
      30 March 2023 09: 36
      The Bolsheviks did absolutely the right thing - the protagonist of this story is a simple peasant, not a tsar. The king did nothing heroic here, on the contrary, he is a weak figure that needed to be protected.
      The role of the people in the fight against the Polish intervention was decisive.
      1. +1
        30 March 2023 19: 38
        “He didn’t do anything heroic, but he couldn’t do anything then.
        1) he is 17 years old, zero education (the ability to read is not education yet), and his mother seemed to be very smart.
        2) Glinka also did not make him the main character.
        In this case, Mikhail was like a symbol: new Russia
        1. 0
          30 March 2023 20: 48
          Glinka chose the loyal name "life for the tsar" at the direction of the tsarist censorship.
          The Soviet government returned the feat to the people, because Susanin did not save the tsar personally, he saved all of Russia.
          If we call this story, then it is better "life for the Motherland."
  10. +9
    30 March 2023 09: 52
    Mr. Samsonov, thanks for the article! hi )))
    And most of the comments are beyond praise, I read without stopping ...
    Thank you dear colleagues!)))
    1. 0
      30 March 2023 19: 26
      Lyudmila Yakovlevna, you like to look at the "root".
      Let's discuss: Mikhail Romanov on the throne or a foreign prince, what is better for Russia?
      It seems to me that in those conditions, the election of Michael was the best option.
      Ps.
      It seems to me that the policy of Mikhail, or rather his father Filaret, would have been reasonable for that period.
      It was necessary, it was necessary to strengthen the state, and this, perhaps, only by strengthening the vertical
  11. +10
    30 March 2023 11: 17
    Good afternoon!
    I join the words of gratitude for the article! Also thanks for the comments, each of them got my plus, even to add, there seems to be nothing.
    Have a nice day!
  12. +3
    30 March 2023 15: 40
    There is a version that these were not Poles, but their allies - the Zaporizhzhya Cossacks.
  13. +4
    30 March 2023 18: 44
    I read somewhere about the age of famous literary characters and real historical figures. Susanin (this gray-bearded old man in the pictures) was 33 years old at the time of his death. I do not vouch for the authenticity.
  14. +2
    30 March 2023 18: 59
    Good health to all.
    Author, I don't understand what you are trying to refute: Susanin's feat? Poles' involvement in his death?
    From the point of view of logic, the death of Mikhail Romanov was beneficial for the Poles: in the event of his death, Vladislav claims his rights to the throne...
  15. +4
    30 March 2023 19: 43
    Thanks to the author for the current article.
  16. +1
    30 March 2023 20: 00
    Somehow, in my student youth, I had a chance to hold in my hands a pre-revolutionary book without title pages (therefore, unfortunately, I don’t know what it was called), which was a collection of articles dedicated to the 300th anniversary of the Romanov dynasty. There, on one engraving, a certain sarcophagus was depicted in the interior of some temple and the inscription "The resting place of Ivan Susanin", so it is strange to read about some of his remains allegedly found in 2002.
  17. +3
    31 March 2023 11: 40
    A prominent Russian historian, one of the founders of the classical history of Russia, Sergei Solovyov also noted that Susanin could have been tortured not by Poles and Lithuanians, but by Russian robbers, Cossacks. Historians did not note large Polish detachments in the winter of 1612–1613. in the Kostroma region. But small gangs of thieves' Cossacks roamed everywhere.

    As part of the gangs of thieves' Cossacks, the Commonwealth, both Poles and Lithuanians, could well have been.
    In addition, the Susanin family could pull the events of an earlier time.
    For example, it is known that by decree of Tsar Vasily Shuisky, the captured Poles were sent to Yaroslavl. In the autumn of 1606 they were in the city. They were given special places to live. Captured Poles were kept at the expense of the state. The prisoners were even allowed to carry weapons, as the local population was unfriendly towards the Poles.

    In 1608, Tsar Vasily Shuisky began negotiations with Poland in order to clear the territory of Russia from the Poles. The Poles, in turn, demanded the release of Yuri and Marina Mnishek. They took an oath that they would not seek the Russian throne and support impostors.
    Despite this, as soon as the Poles were released from Yaroslavl, they ended up in Tushino.
    The Tushino army, meanwhile, began to rob the surrounding towns and villages. They were especially attracted by the road to the North from Moscow. Detachments of Hetman Jan Sapieha and Pan Alexander Lisovsky were sent in this direction. Encountering no serious resistance, they took Pereslavl-Zalessky. Then they moved to Rostov. The city did not then have serious fortifications. The approach of Sapieha's detachments came as a complete surprise to the Rostovites. However, they chose to resist.
    The Rostovites came out to meet the Poles, whose troops outnumbered the Rostov ones. At their head was the voivode Tretyak Seitov. The battle was short but fierce. Some of the townspeople sought salvation in the cathedral church of the Assumption, but to no avail. Soon Rostov was captured. Many residents died, others were able to flee to Yaroslavl and report the trouble to the Yaroslavl people. On October 18, 1608, a delegation of Yaroslavl residents arrived at the camp of Hetman Sapieha with a letter of guilt. It expressed humility and loyalty to False Dmitry II.
    The Tushino people demanded payment of 30 thousand rubles, as well as equipping a thousand horsemen and sending them to the camp of False Dmitry II. In addition, there was a demand to send a large amount of food, since there was an acute shortage of food in the Tushino camp. Some of the inhabitants, not wanting to endure requisitions, left the city with their property.
    Following Yaroslavl, Romanov, Mologa, Rybnaya Sloboda, Poshekhonye and many other settlements were captured. The reasons for such weak resistance were that the main parts of Shuisky's army defended the capital. The rest of the cities did not have sufficient protection and were either taken by surprise, or they themselves opened the gates to the invaders. In the occupied territories, the Tushins perpetrated pogroms and organized various outrages.
    This led to the fact that by 1608 armed uprisings against the robbers began. The inhabitants of Vologda were the first to speak. In 1609, uprisings against the invaders broke out in Yaroslavl, Romanov, Rybnaya Sloboda, Mologa and Uglich. The Poles tried to bring the recalcitrant cities into obedience. Detachments led by Nikita Vysheslavtsev came to the aid of the rebels from Vologda. Near Romanov, they defeated the Poles. Then the insurgent detachments liberated Yaroslavl, Rybnaya Sloboda and Mologa. Vysheslavtsev managed to gain a foothold in Yaroslavl, which made it possible to repulse enemy attacks. Yaroslavl was never captured by the Tushinos. This embittered the Poles and, retreating to Moscow, they completely ruined Uglich, Pereslavl and Rostov. Yaroslavl region by 1610 was a plundered and scorched land.

    Besides foxes climbed oh how far to the northeast and north ..
  18. 0
    April 4 2023 13: 10
    Quote from lisikat2
    From the point of view of logic, the death of Mikhail Romanov was beneficial for the Poles: in the event of his death, Vladislav claims his rights to the throne...
    I would not be so sure that, from the point of view of logic, the death of Mikhail Romanov was beneficial to the Poles. There is one, but very significant fact. It should be borne in mind that at that time in Poland, as he was in honorary captivity (or hostage, or simply in captivity - as you like) was Mikhail Romanov's father, Filaret Romanov. And if Mikhail had been killed, then in Moscow they would have chosen another to reign, since there were competing candidates. Both ours (Trubetskoy, Mstislavsky, Pozharsky), and foreign ones (Swedish prince Karl-Philip, cousin of the Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II - Maximilian). Yes, of course, at the Council it was decided not to attract foreigners, but to choose from a natural hare. But first of all, it was Vladislav of Poland who was rejected. The Council did not want to see a Pole on the throne unanimously.
    So, they would elect someone whose dad was definitely not held hostage in Poland. Would it be beneficial for Poland?
    By the way, when Romanov was elected, an overlay arose: the Cathedral demanded the arrival of the young applicant in Moscow. The Romanov party could not allow this: an inexperienced, timid, inexperienced young man in intrigues would have made an unfavorable impression on the delegates of the Council. Sheremetyev and his supporters had to show miracles of eloquence, proving how dangerous the path from the Kostroma village of Domnino, where Mikhail was, to Moscow. Was it not then that the legend about the feat of Ivan Susanin, who saved the life of the future tsar, arose? After a heated debate, the Romanovites managed to convince the Council to cancel the decision to summon Mikhail Romanov to the Cathedral.
  19. 0
    8 May 2023 23: 37
    The story with Susanin is, of course, beautiful, and I really like it.
    But there are some doubts.
    Well, imagine, somewhere in 1942, a team of German huntsmen comes into a remote village in the wilds of the Bryansk forests and instead of the traditional "eggs, milk" they demand from the headman to lead them to Stalin's secret shelter.
    The headman, who even found out about the beginning of the war with almost a year's delay, led them.
    Somewhere in the direction of Tiksi .....
    And silence.....
  20. 0
    10 May 2023 14: 43
    I wonder where patriots could come from in the era of feudalism, and even more so among serfs, who absolutely did not care who to wear dues so that the master did not screw up? Lord of the imperial bakers, you are complete hypocrites!
  21. 0
    6 June 2023 12: 48
    Yes, this is insanity. The Polish-Swedish intervention brought the Romanovs to power, and then the Poles wanted to kill Romanov. And what did the sushin care about the Germans. Who at that time recognized them from the people and generally saw them in the eye ..
  22. 0
    29 August 2023 09: 15
    As A.N. Tolstoy wrote in "Peter the Great": "The devil saw him, Prince Lychko, how he left the Ugric land." So it is here, dark water in the clouds
  23. 0
    25 September 2023 07: 28
    The big-haired scribbler has lost his article, he wants to cause confusion in the Russian ranks