In the area of ​​​​Davydov Brod, Kherson region, a missile strike destroyed an S-300 anti-aircraft missile system of the Armed Forces of Ukraine - Ministry of Defense

16
In the area of ​​​​Davydov Brod, Kherson region, a missile strike destroyed an S-300 anti-aircraft missile system of the Armed Forces of Ukraine - Ministry of Defense

Ukrainian troops lost another radar of the S-300 anti-aircraft system, air defense systems at the Svatovsky line intercepted several missiles of the American MLRS HIMARS, without changes in the main directions. This is stated in the new report of the Ministry of Defense.

The guidance radar of the Ukrainian S-300 air defense system was destroyed near the village of Davydov Brod in the Kherson region. There are no details in the official summary, but local resources previously reported that the complex was hit by an anti-radar missile launched by our aviation.



Today, our aviation from the left bank of the Kherson region worked for 5 plus! The S-300 was hit on the right bank in the area of ​​the settlement. Davydov Brod, in the morning. anti-radar missile

- the message said.

Air defense systems intercepted eighteen HIMARS MLRS rockets and one GLSDB guided rocket. Here, too, without details, but earlier the press center of the Zapad group in its statement said that the Armed Forces of Ukraine had attempted to deliver a group missile attack by the HIMARS MLRS in the Svatovo region, all the shells were intercepted by the S-300V4 air defense system. There are no data for GLSDB.

On the main directions without major changes, nothing extraordinary happened during the day. In the Kupyansk direction, with air strikes and artillery strikes, the troops of the "Western" group defeated the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the areas of Molchanovo, Sinkovka and Berestovoye of the Kharkov region. The enemy lost about 65 personnel, two armored cars and three cars.

On Krasno-Limansky, the troops of the "Center" group struck in the areas of Nevskoye and Chervonaya Dibrova of the LPR, destroying up to 125 Vushniks, four armored cars, three pickup trucks and self-propelled guns Gvozdika.

In the Donetsk direction, the troops of the "Southern" group continue to conduct active hostilities, having destroyed up to 240 military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and mercenaries, three infantry fighting vehicles, three armored personnel carriers, two armored cars, four vehicles and a D-30 howitzer in a day. In the South-Donetsk and Zaporizhia directions, the Vostok group of troops fought in the Novomikhailovka and Vugledar regions. The battles in the Ugledar region turned into positional ones, neither side has the opportunity to go on the offensive. It is reported that the enemy lost up to 20 people killed and wounded, as well as three cars per day. In the Kherson direction, 18 Ukrainian servicemen and five cars were destroyed per day.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    16 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. -7
      28 March 2023 15: 09
      Our anti-radar missile is the most rocket-propelled in Ukraine. To get a locator at such a distance? Obviously, someone let him enter the air defense zone of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
      1. +6
        28 March 2023 15: 22
        The radar of the Su-35 fighter makes it possible to detect targets from a distance of 350-400 km. to destroy air defense, it uses missiles from the X-31 family - their flight speed is Mach 3, the range of destruction is 110 km. Each aircraft is capable of taking six of these missiles, and a squadron salvo can destroy even a well-defended object. One of the most interesting missiles in the Su-35 arsenal is the aviation version of the 3M-14 Kalibr missile with a range of up to 2500 km. With their help, the aircraft is able to hit targets in most of Europe without leaving Russian airspace.
        1. 0
          28 March 2023 20: 24
          Tales from the textbook about the X-31 squadron. It has nothing to do with real combat use. Everything is much more complicated.
      2. +7
        28 March 2023 15: 22
        Well, why immediately into the air defense zone of the Armed Forces of Ukraine?

        There is no exact data on what targets on the territory of Ukraine the X-31PM could destroy. Strictly speaking, given the characteristics of the missile, these targets can be anything - the launch range of the new missile has almost doubled compared to Soviet modifications and amounted to about 300 kilometers instead of 170. radar. In this sense, another nickname for the missile, which appeared with the light hand of American military analysts, is fully justified - Bloodhound (English "snoop").


        In early March 2022, the first information appeared that, among other weapons, the Russian Aerospace Forces for the first time used the latest Kh-31PM anti-radar missile. The previous modification of the missile with a launch range of 150 kilometers was called "Krypton" by foreign military analysts. The rocket received this nickname for its characteristic white trail, which, like the characteristic white glow of an inert gas, is barely noticeable.


        It is almost impossible to intercept this missile - there is no exact data on the speed of the Kh-31PM, however, the previous modification of the missile could reach a speed of 3,5M (4200 kilometers per hour), which makes it difficult to destroy it even with modern air defense systems.

        https://life.ru/p/1477045
      3. +7
        28 March 2023 15: 28
        Get a locator at such a distance?

        which? Davydov Brod is 60 km from the line of contact.
        X-22PM flies much further.
        But the fact that they pulled up the S-300 so close means impudence.
        1. +3
          28 March 2023 16: 08
          "means impudence" is good, if impudence. Worse, if there is a desire to shoot down our cars over our own territory. This trend needs to be nipped in the bud.
          1. +1
            28 March 2023 18: 12
            Worse, if there is a desire to shoot down our cars over our own territory.

            Well, such a desire is simply stupid not to have.
            But it actually ended badly.
            In general, what kind of locator is usually not written.
            But it is strange that they pushed him forward, he usually stands FOR the air defense system.
            Maybe it's preparation for the attack?
            Then why did you include...
            1. 0
              28 March 2023 23: 58
              “He usually stands FOR the air defense system” - he is part of the air defense system, and they will put it where they put it.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. +4
      28 March 2023 15: 34
      Has the real destruction of enemy air defenses begun, or just an isolated case? I would like to believe that they will not stop there and will finally clear the way for bomber aircraft. After all, without its use, we will be storming fortifications and cities for a very long time, losing our boys.
      1. +3
        28 March 2023 18: 45
        Quote: Gritsa
        Has the real destruction of enemy air defenses begun, or just an isolated case?

        Our aviation did not stop doing this from the first day of the NWO. The Armed Forces of Ukraine had about 33 S-300 divisions at the beginning of the SVO, and already in the first 2-3 months more than half of these complexes were knocked out. After that, the delivery of such air defense systems from NATO countries was organized, they even tried to persuade Turkey on their S-400. At the end of last year, the Armed Forces of Ukraine had no more than a dozen S-300s, after which at least two more divisions were destroyed (precisely radars, because the destruction of launchers does not really matter). And now - another minus one radar / division. True, such beautiful photographs with a jewelry hit by the X-31 in the very canvas of the radar ... I don’t even remember.
        But NATO countries are now supplying their medium and short-range air defense systems. They cannot cover all the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but the stability of their air defense is still quite high ... Focal / objective. In addition, medium-range air defense systems of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are usually hidden in the depths of their territory and are activated only by external target designation at the time of capture / launch, it is not easy to catch them. But the hunt continues.
        It is expedient to start a massive air defense suppression only in the case of a large and complex operation, preferably to ensure an offensive on a relatively wide front. I hope such operations are being prepared.
        Quote: Gritsa
        finally clear the way for bomber aircraft.

        Deep raids by bombers are extremely risky, for this there are KR and OTRK, for the frontline zone - UAB and KAB. Nobody will bomb from the span without complete control of the airspace and complete suppression of air defense. No one else will lose aviation anymore - it's not worth it, it's too expensive ... especially the loss of trained pilots.
        Quote: Gritsa
        without its use, we will storm fortifications and cities for a very long time, losing our boys.

        For this, there are UAB and KAB with a power of 250, 500 and 1500 kg. Aviation is actively developing their use, industry is producing ... and in the stormed cities of the Donbass there are civilians waiting for our liberation ... these are our citizens who voted for the establishment of the DPR and sovereignty from fascist Ukraine. And they cover themselves as hostages.
    7. -10
      28 March 2023 16: 05
      What is the table below?
      Where did ukrov 400 aircraft come from?
      They didn’t even have two hundred before the war!
      And there have been no deliveries from NATO yet ...
      And where did eight thousand tanks, etc. come from?
      Something incredible.
      1. +2
        28 March 2023 17: 53
        There are 8k+ armored vehicles in general. According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, they had 1 combat aircraft in service as of January 2022, 488
      2. +2
        28 March 2023 18: 16
        Where did ukrov 400 aircraft come from?
        They didn’t even have two hundred before the war!
        And there have been no deliveries from NATO yet ...

        Blah blah blah . Firstly, 480, and secondly, how could it not have happened if Slovakia handed it over and Poland most likely.
        1. 0
          28 March 2023 22: 35
          Quote: bk316
          , secondly, how could it not have happened if Slovakia handed it over to Poland, most likely.

          And the United States has its own several dozen, since the summer through Poland disassembled under the guise of "spare parts". And England all over the world bought Soviet aircraft for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. We tried.
          Now aircraft from NATO will go - the French have already promised 40 Mirages-2000, the British Eurofighters to Poland for the sake of their MiG-29 for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, others are also preparing their F-16s. And the US, of course. It will be hot in summer.
      3. +1
        28 March 2023 19: 24
        Quote: aars
        They didn’t even have two hundred before the war!
        It was not in working condition, but there were even more than four hundred in storage. Campaign collected from several one. Plus, the Eastern European sixes leaked what they could ...
    8. -3
      28 March 2023 16: 42
      We have enough radiation weapons. But how often it is used is another story. Here some ask questions about numbers, planes, helicopters, tanks. So the planes of the Saloreich have long been destroyed, the numbers are growing at the expense of the planes supplied by the Czechs, Poles, Romanians, Slovaks. Soviet-made cars left over from the Warsaw Pact. Saloeds on such are still able to fly to the first MANPADS or a pair of our exterminators.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"