Hungarian parliamentarians approved Finland's admission to NATO with almost 97 percent of the vote

24
Hungarian parliamentarians approved Finland's admission to NATO with almost 97 percent of the vote

Today, the Hungarian Parliament approved a document providing for Finland's entry into the North Atlantic Alliance. Recall that Finland filed a joint application with Sweden to join NATO last year. At the same time, the authorities of Finland and Sweden declared that they would join NATO "only together." However, time passed, and against the backdrop of difficulties and disagreements that arose, Finland decided not to wait for its Scandinavian neighbors and is ready to join the Western military bloc alone - without Sweden.

Now, in order for Finland to join NATO, it needs to obtain the consent of the Turkish parliament. The other member countries of the alliance have already given their consent. It is believed that Turkish parliamentarians can approve the Finnish application in the coming weeks - until May 14, when presidential elections will be held in Turkey.



In the Finnish parliament, the application for Finland's accession to NATO was approved by 96,8% of those who voted - 182 parliamentarians.

Recall that Russia announced the creation of new military units in the north-west of the country in the event of Finland joining NATO. The fact is that with such an entry, NATO and Russia will have an additional 1000 km of a common border. Accordingly, Russia cannot leave such a challenge unanswered. Another question: why is it Finland, with which for a long time there were quite constructive relations? The answer can only be that in Finland the local elites are not independent and are ready to do everything that they are told by the “main ally” - the one across the ocean.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    24 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. -8
      27 March 2023 20: 04
      It's okay.
      Putin knows his business and will complete it to the end.
      1. +4
        27 March 2023 20: 26
        Quote: ximkim
        It's okay.
        Putin knows his business and will complete it to the end.

        Bring the number of NATO members to the number of countries in the world, excluding Russia?
        1. man
          +2
          27 March 2023 20: 35
          Bring the number of NATO members to the number of countries in the world, excluding Russia?
          More. Poland and the Baltic States will join NATO twice
      2. man
        +7
        27 March 2023 21: 06
        Putin knows his business and will complete it to the end.
        I would like to know to what
    2. +1
      27 March 2023 20: 13
      The Finno-Ugric group of languages ​​has a significant influence.
      1. -3
        27 March 2023 21: 14
        Quote: constructor_sidorov
        The Finno-Ugric group of languages ​​has a significant influence.

        You are close to the truth. Finno-Ugrians tend to divide their mistakes by ethnicity. One got into a mess, so others should get into a mess, and how to get out of this situation, again, will be decided by one (more successful), followed by others. The problem with small peoples is that they consider themselves small and incapable of pursuing an independent policy, which drives them into the illusion of increasing their importance through collectivism. In this situation, Suomi definitely flies into the promotion and worsens its position, even in historical, even in economic terms.
    3. -3
      27 March 2023 20: 30
      "NATO and Russia will have an additional 1000 km of a common border"
      Missiles need boundaries? Customs control, paperwork, passport stamps?
      To whom and when did it bother at all ?!
      For some reason, I did not find a common border with Syria, but I well remembered footage of launches of twenty-something "Caliber" from the Caspian Sea against Syrian militants
      1. 0
        28 March 2023 01: 31
        Missiles need boundaries?


        No. Therefore, Finland in NATO is possible NATO missiles 148 km from our St. Petersburg! And it is also to Murmansk - about 200 kilometers and a little more to the main base of our Northern Fleet - Severomorsk. And about 500 kilometers to Severodvinsk - the largest ship repair shop in Russia.

        And if we really didn't give a damn about the border with NATO, we wouldn't start the NWO:
        http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67828
        Address of the President of the Russian Federation
        21 February 2022 year
        ...Ukraine's accession to NATO is a direct threat to Russia's security.
        ... If such systems are deployed in Ukraine, they will be able to hit objects throughout the European territory of Russia, as well as beyond the Urals. The flight time to Moscow for Tomahawk cruise missiles will be less than 35 minutes, for ballistic missiles from the Kharkov region - 7-8 minutes, and for hypersonic strike weapons - 4-5 minutes. This is called, directly "knife to the throat" ....
    4. -1
      27 March 2023 20: 33
      Ban Hungarians gas and oil, under any pretext.
      And we have a lot of them.
      1. -1
        27 March 2023 23: 05
        You deftly deal with the allies ... The Hungarians held out to the last, waiting for a quick denouement of the NWO ... They did not wait ...
    5. +2
      27 March 2023 21: 00
      Well, why more and more often the news does not have an author? Is the AI ​​Chat slowly harnessing?
    6. +2
      27 March 2023 21: 43
      Quote from Fangaro
      why more and more often the news does not have an author?

      cautious
      No, no, not in connection with anything!
      just...just in case...
    7. -8
      27 March 2023 21: 58
      With its special trade operation in Ukraine - grain deals, Istanbul gatherings with the Nazis of Ukraine in Turkey, humanitarian corridors, ammonia pipelines, the Russian Federation has only worsened its strategic position in Europe since March 2022 - the line of direct contact with NATO has only increased by 1500 kilometers, the number of troops The United States in the immediate vicinity of the borders of Russia has increased significantly, the militarization and nazification of Ukraine, on the contrary, has grown.

      This is a hard lesson for the leadership of the Russian Federation - you cannot fight and trade with the enemy at the same time, you need to make a choice as soon as possible - either victory and then the maximum mobilization of forces and means in order to finally finish off, crush Ukraine, liberate Kiev and Odessa, or defeat - a temporary freeze of the conflict on the current LBS, the rearmament of the Nazi regime in Ukraine and the imminent new war with Ukraine.
    8. +1
      27 March 2023 22: 24
      Putin's third plan in action.
      Finland is getting closer to NATO.
    9. 0
      27 March 2023 23: 18
      It is interesting what Prince Arpad would say about the parliamentarians.
      He led the Hungarians away from the Pecheneg raids on the banks of the Danube from the territory
      Russian.
    10. +1
      27 March 2023 23: 26
      Q.E.D. And the fact that Hungary has recently been over-praised, supposedly they are somehow different and supposedly for their own. They march in even rows in a single formation with the whole west.
    11. +4
      28 March 2023 00: 14
      Quote from sdivt
      "NATO and Russia will have an additional 1000 km of a common border"
      Missiles need boundaries? Customs control, paperwork, passport stamps?
      To whom and when did it bother at all ?!
      For some reason, I did not find a common border with Syria, but I well remembered footage of launches of twenty-something "Caliber" from the Caspian Sea against Syrian militants

      And what, well, they pulled out a lot of money, showed that there are such Calibers, in fact there is more window dressing, in the conditions of Syria, the FAB is much more relevant based on the price-effectiveness criterion. Threaten with NATO Calibers? ... Well, Tomogawks also have borders on the side ...
    12. +1
      28 March 2023 00: 34
      You are confusing things. Hungary refused Finland's approval for reasons that arose between Hungary and Finland. Hungary protects the interests of Hungary. Russia's interests will be protected by Russia.
    13. +1
      28 March 2023 02: 20
      If only there were other figures in Soros's homeland! But his "brilliant" plan to buy premierships for pimply sluts and nerds in schools, ready to guzzle land and trade in the sovereignty of the represented peoples in gratitude for the loot, recognition and coke, ran into one small nuance .. namely, even if you put a lousy one at the head of the lion pride sheep, then in the end we have a flock of black sheep .. Mayi Sandu, Sanna Marin, Pashinyans, a shaggy sniffer from London, all this HUNDRED with languid, stoned eyes, this is the final bubble on the surface of the swamp that was once Europe, because they snickered, it's time to degrease. sucks that it will be done as usual by strangers, by no means our potsons ..
    14. +2
      28 March 2023 04: 01
      Quote from Fizik13
      Ban Hungarians gas and oil, under any pretext.
      And we have a lot of them.

      And where do you get money from? In a nightstand?
    15. -4
      28 March 2023 09: 33
      No wonder ... The Hungarians have always fought against Russia and the USSR, why be surprised? They waited when it would be possible to snatch a tidbit from Saloreich, it did not work out, but it turned out to annoy Russia on the sly. Fino-Ugric roots, rather becoming Europioids and the influence of the Anglo-Saxon rabble.
    16. -1
      28 March 2023 09: 50
      Quote from: dump22
      Finland in NATO is possible NATO missiles 148 km from our St. Petersburg! And it is also to Murmansk - about 200 kilometers and a little more to the main base of our Northern Fleet - Severomorsk

      Sir ... it’s even somehow uncomfortable to speak, but would you open the card, or what?
      From St. Petersburg to the borders of Estonia (NATO member!) Only 135 km. Closer than to the Finnish borders, no?
      From Murmansk to the borders of Norway (also a member of NATO!) Only 100 km. Twice as close as anywhere in Finland!
      But this, of course, is "different", and does not convince anyone))
    17. -2
      28 March 2023 17: 10
      Quote from Tim666
      And what, well, they pulled out a lot of money, showed that there are such Calibers, in fact there is more window dressing, in the conditions of Syria, the FAB is much more relevant based on the price-effectiveness criterion. Threaten with NATO Calibers? ... Well, Tomogawks also have borders on the side ...


      Sir, re-read my comment. Once again.
      I'm just writing that border missiles are not a decree. If it suddenly comes to direct collisions, launches can be carried out even from the Federal Republic of Germany in Moscow, even because of the Urals - in London.
      Therefore, all this talk about "plus 100500 km of common borders" is never relevant today
    18. 0
      28 March 2023 23: 03
      Quote from sdivt
      Quote from Tim666
      And what, well, they pulled out a lot of money, showed that there are such Calibers, in fact there is more window dressing, in the conditions of Syria, the FAB is much more relevant based on the price-effectiveness criterion. Threaten with NATO Calibers? ... Well, Tomogawks also have borders on the side ...


      Sir, re-read my comment. Once again.
      I'm just writing that border missiles are not a decree. If it suddenly comes to direct collisions, launches can be carried out even from the Federal Republic of Germany in Moscow, even because of the Urals - in London.
      Therefore, all this talk about "plus 100500 km of common borders" is never relevant today

      And yes and no, on the one hand, if we take some kind of global war, especially with the use of nuclear weapons, then all these flying minutes are mostly nonsense, by the way, in NATO, the basis of strategic nuclear forces is sea carriers. If we take a certain conflict a la NVO, then nevertheless, a greater distance allows you to build a more layered air defense.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"