The US Congress intends to simplify the procedure for the implementation of restrictions on export controls under the AUKUS

13
The US Congress intends to simplify the procedure for the implementation of restrictions on export controls under the AUKUS

The US Congress intends to simplify the procedure for the implementation of restrictions on export controls within the framework of the trilateral defense alliance AUKUS by passing a bill that will accelerate the technological cooperation of member countries (UK, US and Australia).

Under this legislative initiative, the US Department of State, in conjunction with the Pentagon, will be responsible for providing information regarding the issuance of a license to export defense products, in order for the United States to cooperate with its allies in the field of quantum technologies and the development of hypersonic weapons. These technologies will form the basis of an agreement adopted by the AUKUS member countries in order to eliminate the inequality of opportunities (combat forces and means) before Australia receives a nuclear submarine from England and the States.



Member of the US House of Representatives, Republican Joe Courtney, in an interview with Defense News, announced the need to develop some mechanism as soon as possible, with the help of which the regime for restricting the supply of weapons under the International Trade in Arms Rules (ITAR) will be facilitated.

Thus, the Department of State will be charged with the task of exercising control and oversight within the framework of ITAR, while the duties of the US Department of Defense will be to comply with technological security measures and the procedure for distributing classified information.

All of the above measures are aimed at ensuring the protection of intellectual property rights for technological products manufactured in the United States, which, it is argued, will help to more effectively manage the troops.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    23 March 2023 20: 49
    This filthy SHARASHKA will be worse than NATO! crying
    1. 0
      24 March 2023 08: 06
      Fear here is a subjective matter, the outfit of forces is what it is and is, so they decided to pull the money from Camberra, it looks like yes!
      And on the issue of self-naming, it will be more accurate: Usuka ... In order of importance of members laughing
  2. +2
    23 March 2023 21: 01
    Member countries - you can't say better
    This is not a short option yet, but for a short one they will be banned again.
    1. +1
      23 March 2023 23: 28
      States are dismantling the "Missile Technology Control Regime"
      (sells Tomahawks to Australia and Japan).
      The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty will be next.
  3. +1
    23 March 2023 21: 03
    The United States decided to sacrifice its vassal Germany in the war with the Russian Federation, and England in the war with China will sacrifice Australia. Well, what, it’s not a pity, and it’s not the same to fight, they still have Canada for permanent residence
    1. +3
      23 March 2023 22: 27
      The setting is a little different. WB in AUKUS for the USA is not really needed. The basis of this currency area is the USA, Australia and (later) Canada. The VB is taken because the king of the VB is in command of the armies of Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The inconvenience of the World Bank for the United States is the surviving imperial ambitions. The WB is claiming its own currency area or greater influence in the AUKUS. But she has no resources, only show-offs. Unless the agents, developed over the centuries, on which it still rests.
      1. +1
        23 March 2023 23: 45
        Plus for the logic. But this union shows that the rest are vassals of their will and are a bargaining chip.
      2. 0
        24 March 2023 01: 23
        Hell, he doesn't command armies. The WB was taken in because it proved its allegiance during the Cold War, the Gulf War, the invasion of Iraq. The World Bank has always supported the United States at the political level. WB intelligence and think tanks also have a place to be and this is actually a good bonus for this military alliance. In general, the World Bank can also offer Anglo-Saxons to the general alliance.

        There is also NAFTA, which includes Mexico. Mexico could also have a share if it deals with the cartels or lets the US deal with them. This country has an excellent demographic pyramid and a fairly cheap labor force. You can move low-level production from Asia there and at the same time bring people from Mexico to the United States as a labor force where hands are needed (plumbers, builders, electricians, cleaners ...).

        The result is a pyramid like this:
        Level 1 - the so-called Anglo-Saxons (Mexico is questionable).
        Level 2 - loyal and important partners: Mexico, Japan, Korea, Israel, the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Singapore (despite the fact that Singapore depends more on China in trade, its ties with the Anglo-Saxon countries are much greater).
        Level 3 - devoted and just partners: Poland, Romania, Ukraine, the Baltic states, Taiwan, Turkey, Vietnam, Philippines, India, Jordan, Czech Republic, Slovakia, almost all of Latin America (except Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba), part of African countries (in mostly in the Commonwealth of Great Britain), Jordan, Qatar, Kuwait, and possibly others for the remainder.

        Old Europe is not here, because it is more of a competitor than a partner.
  4. 0
    23 March 2023 21: 08
    This is the true military alliance. It makes no sense to compare with NATO, because NATO is purely to increase the influence of the Americans and the British in Europe
  5. 0
    23 March 2023 21: 08
    ... for the purpose of cooperation between the United States and its allies in the field of quantum technologies and the development of hypersonic weapons ...

    Yes, they need to hurry, if the States do not "strangle China in the economic embrace" or win on the battlefield in the next 10-15 years, then it will be too late. Time works for China...
  6. +2
    23 March 2023 21: 13
    Meanwhile, in the states...
    Chicago Hockey Players will not wear LGBT uniforms to warm up ahead of their upcoming NHL game against Vancouver, according to the CBC.
    It is noted that after the adoption in the Russian Federation of a law banning LGBT propaganda in the media, the Internet, advertising, literature and cinema, the clubs of the National Hockey League, in which Russian players play, faced difficulties with the implementation of relevant actions. The Blackhawks decided not to use the rainbow jerseys as part of their LGBTQ campaign, citing security concerns for the club's Russian hockey players.
    It is reported that after talking with the players, together with lawyers, it was decided not to wear the rainbow jerseys to the warm-up game against Vancouver, which will be held in Chicago on March 27.
    Some kind of oxymoron. US citizens, US lawyers are fighting local peds referring to our law.
  7. 0
    23 March 2023 21: 30
    Pity the Japanese. It is purely human pity.
    And I don’t feel sorry for Tsushima, and I don’t feel sorry for Halkin-Gol.
    1. 0
      23 March 2023 23: 23
      And why do you feel sorry for our Asian enemy? No, we persuaded the Japanese for a long time. But you won’t be forced to be nice.