Italian "syphilis" in Russian media spaces

Prologue

Only the author's opinion is expressed in the text of this article. The reader has the right to disagree with him. Comparison of the author and his opinions with the intruders of certain parties, structures or states has nothing to do with the thoughts indicated in this article and remains only a subjective statement of the reader himself. Enjoy reading…

On December 12, 2022, the series “Casanova in Russia. Secret mission. But the premiere, which is quite natural, Channel One did not manage, and the series was released on repeat, and more than once ...

One could speak about this series, as PR people usually do, they say, this series is sex, lies, deceit and love, based on "historical events”, but this is not the purpose of the author of this article.

There are enough really explicit scenes in the series, but this is not so bad, and it’s not even alarming that the series was broadcast in the evening, until midnight, but the real blackening the history of the Russian state!

For quite a long time I struggled to understand the meaning and necessity of such a series, in such crazy monetary costs for its creation, the improbability of the advertising campaign and the principle of this whole wide-screen ridiculous performance ...

There were suspicions, of course, but now they have simply grown stronger (<< Some books would be much clearer if they had not been tried to be made so clear.>> - E. Kant "Critique of Pure Reason")

Judge for yourself, let's take at least one character from this series - Grigory Potemkin, a great man in all respects, an odious, key, historical personality.
It was he who founded the Black Sea Fleet, he was the first to annex the Crimea, Potemkin was the founder of the cities: Sevastopol, Kherson, Nikolaev and many others.

And in the series, he is a bribe taker, a sycophant and an embezzler of funds... Let me remind you once again that the series was created on the basis and under the auspices of the federal Channel One and, of course, its general director, K. Ernst.

We follow further…

The events that this frivolous series tells about take place in 1762, and here it is worth referring to the historical and medical information:

“Syphilis is a dangerous venereal disease that got its name from the shepherd Siphil, the hero of the poem “Syphilis or a French Disease”, published in Venice in 1530. Its author, the outstanding Italian scientist Jirolamo Fracastoro, gave the most detailed description of the disease in it. “This serious disease affects and destroys meat, breaks and leads to decay of bones, tears and destroys nerves” (Spanish physician Diaz de Isla 1537).”

“In 1762, the incidence of syphilis in Russia rose to such heights that Catherine II personally attended a meeting of the Senate dedicated to this problem. In 1764, doctors were charged with investigating who infected the patient; in 1775, “obscene persons” were already placed in strait houses and punished with batogs. In 1800, Emperor Paul I ordered that depraved women be sent from Moscow and St. Petersburg to Irkutsk factories.

I believe that not only I have a legitimate question, why do we need such a series, mind you, not a movie, but a whole series - 12 episodes ... And all this against the backdrop of the SVO, the law banning LGBT people, attempts to revive our primordial Russian / Russian values, restore pride in the history of the Russian state and raise the spirit of patriotism among young people ...

Most likely, the article will raise more questions than answers, but what can be said with absolute certainty is that you and I pay taxes not for such filming, such series, sorry, “about the plague of love and other amusing diseases.”

PS

Don't worry, to be continued...

The expected release date for the continuation of the series "Casanova in Russia" - the 2nd season in Russia on Channel One - is November 21, 2023.

Comments

[Dmitry_7]

The article is obviously designed for those who watched this cinematic masterpiece.
For example, I haven’t watched and don’t intend to, and I’ve been watching the zombie man once every five years for many years now.
So what is the article about?
That Prince Potemkin was made a bastard? Uh-huh, well, it's clear - a jamb worthy of demand.
What about syphilis? Is it mentioned in this "movie"?
About the fact that budget money for every artistic feces is removed?
Girl, there is no need to continue, let's better issue a collective appeal to Roskomnadzor, huh? To remove all this bullshit from the screens. I will support you in this endeavor.

[gsev]

Quote: Dmitry_7

The article is obviously designed for those who watched this cinematic masterpiece.

The article raises the problem of propaganda of debauchery on Russian television in wartime. In theory, after this article, Putin should demand criminal liability for Ernst for wasting state funds on promoting depravity. This film is more vicious than LGBT propaganda. The majority of people cannot be persuaded to pedarasty, but to debauchery, as it was under Yeltsin and Gorbachev, is very simple.

[Dmitry_7]

For a long time, Ernst and a bunch of other figures of "culture and education" should also be involved in the criminal case.
But, for some reason, more often the initiative to bring at least some kind of responsibility or to ban activities comes not from state structures, but from the citizens themselves.
Fresh example
https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2023/03/25/v-krasnodare-trebuyut-zapretit-koncert-ani-lorak

[dmi.pris1]

You throw it! To an investigation and a criminal case? So you can go out on yourself .. Sad sarcasm. Nothing is so easy, Ernst, just a pawn, only big in size

[zenion]

If you do not respond, he will write to Sportloto! And now we have noble blood flowing in every vein

[Ermak_Timofeich]

Let's better issue a collective appeal to Roskomnadzor, huh? To remove all this bullshit from the screens.

It is not superfluous to hold accountable. At least - for libel.

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote: Ermak_Timofeich

It is not superfluous to hold accountable. At least - for libel.

despite the fact that a statement on slander should be written by the one who was slandered, let's send Potemkin to the police department with this ..

[Romanovski]

Central TV channels and youth MUZ TV - as a rule and have long been promoting Western "values" and lifestyles among young people and middle-aged people ... The war against Russian society began in 1993 by washing brains and hearts in the Western way .... Hot the phase of the war AGAINST Russia - began in 2014 and 2022 .... And the preparatory phase of the war against Russia (from 1993 to 2014) - the West won completely and unconditionally ... Glamor, consumer attitude to life, half-naked society cats (like a lioness ...) and cats, contempt and disregard for working people (the so-called rogue people) ..., below the belt jokes on all base TV shows .... Nightclubs, stand-up comedies, Houses 2 and so on .... All this vulgarity, lack of spirituality and base "culture" - it's time to sweep out of Russia with a filthy broom ...

[Yaroslav Tekkel]

Judge for yourself, let's take at least one character from this series - Grigory Potemkin, a great man in all respects, an odious, key, historical personality.
It was he who founded the Black Sea Fleet, he was the first to annex the Crimea, Potemkin was the founder of the cities: Sevastopol, Kherson, Nikolaev and many others.
...
And in the series, he is a bribe taker, a sycophant and an embezzler ...
...
The events of this frivolous series take place in 1762

Well, Crimea and so on - it was very much later, and in 1762 there were no merits (except, perhaps, those that are not boasted in society) for him.

Even in tsarist times, the attitude towards Potemkin was controversial.

In military affairs, P. carried out some rational reforms, especially when he became a field marshal, in 1784: he destroyed powder, pigtails and farts, introduced light boots, etc. d.; there are, however, reviews that the negligence of P. brought the affairs of the military department into a chaotic state. An extremely important matter for P. there was the construction of a fleet on the Black Sea; the fleet was built very hastily, partly from unusable material, but in the ensuing war with Turkey, it provided significant services. colonial activity. was subjected to many complaints - and indeed, despite the enormous costs, did not achieve even a remote resemblance to what he painted in his letters to Empress P.; nevertheless, impartial witnesses - like K. AP Razumovsky, in 1782 visited New Russia, - could not help but be surprised at what had been achieved. Kherson. founded in 1778, is at that time already a significant city; Ekaterinoslav is called "sculpted"; on the site of the former desert, which served as a way for the raids of the Crimeans, every 20-30 faiths. there were villages. The idea of ​​a university, a conservatory and dozens of factories in Yekaterinoslav remained unfulfilled; failed P. and immediately create something significant from Nikolaev. From a huge number of business papers and letters from the office of P. one can see how many-sided and vigilant was his activity in the management of southern Russia; but at the same time, feverish haste, self-delusion, boasting and striving for excessively difficult goals are felt in everything. The invitation of colonists, the laying of cities, the cultivation of forests and vineyards, the promotion of sericulture, the establishment of schools, factories, printing houses, shipyards - all this was undertaken extremely sweepingly, on a large scale, and P. spared neither money, nor labor, nor people. Much has been started and abandoned; the other remained on paper from the very beginning; only the smallest part of the bold projects was realized. In 1787 was the famous journey of Empress Catherine to the south was undertaken, which turned into a triumph for P., who with remarkable skill managed to hide all the weaknesses of reality and expose his brilliant successes. Kherson, with its fortress, surprised even foreigners, and the view of the Sevastopol raid with a squadron of 15 large and 20 small ships was the most spectacular sight of the entire trip. At parting with the Empress in Kharkov, P. received the name "Tavrichesky". In 1787 was the war with Turkey began, partly caused by the activities of P. The organizer of Novorossia had to take on the role of a commander. The lack of readiness of the troops affected from the very beginning; P., on whom hopes were pinned that he would destroy Turkey, became very discouraged and even thought about concessions. The Empress, in letters, had to repeatedly support his cheerfulness. Only after the successful defense of Kinburn by Suvorov P. began to act more decisively and laid siege to Ochakov, which, however, was taken only a year later: the siege was carried out without energy, many soldiers died from illness, cold and the need for the necessary. After the capture of Ochakov P. returned to St. Petersburg, honored in every possible way along the way; in St. Petersburg. he received generous rewards and often had conversations with the empress about foreign policy: at that time he stood for compliance with Sweden and Prussia. Returning to the theater of war, he took care of replenishing the number of troops and slowly moved with the main mass of troops to the Dniester, not participating in the operations of Repnin and Suvorov. The Bendery besieged by him surrendered to him without bloodshed. In 1790 was AP received the title of Hetman of the Cossack Yekaterinoslav and Black Sea troops. He lived in Iasi, surrounded by Asiatic luxury and a crowd of servile servants, but did not stop corresponding with St. Petersburg. and. with numerous agents abroad; he took care of the food and staffing of the army in the best possible way. After the new successes of Suvorov, in January 1791, P. again asked permission to appear in St. Petersburg and for the last time arrived in the capital, where he considered his presence necessary in view of the rapid rise of Zubov. He failed to achieve his goal - the removal of Zubov. Although the empress gave him an increasingly tight share of participation in state affairs, her personal relationship with P. changed for the worse: at her request, P. had to leave the capital, where he spent 4 months on feasts, etc. n 850 тыс.

[Komsomol]

Don't worry, to be continued...

That's scary.)

[rotmistr60]

the series was created on the basis and under the auspices of the federal Channel One and, of course, its CEO, K. Ernst

Personally, the series didn’t arouse interest in me, so I didn’t watch it and I can’t say anything about the plot. But on the personality and activities of Mr. Ernst on TV, many in the country have long had questions, and sharp ones at that. But obviously he still belongs to the "untouchables".

[Per se.]

Quote: rotmistr60

But obviously he still belongs to the "untouchables".

In our country, those who, during the NWO, sell raw materials to enemies, who strangle Russia with sanctions, who have their own selfish interests in Ukraine and give rise to "strangeness" of the NWO, turn out to be like that. And, nothing, but there is not a movie, but civilians and our soldiers really die.

[parusnik]

A strange article, a sharp transition from Potemkin to venereal diseases. And so ... watch less, the first channel, but don't watch at all.

[Rosemary]

Quote: parusnik

A strange article, a sharp transition from Potemkin to venereal diseases.

And the topic of boobs is not disclosed.

[parusnik]

And the topic of boobs is not disclosed.

From the word, absolutely.

[Waterways 672]

An anecdote on the topic of the title of the article.
An Italian woman in port escorts an American sailor. He waves his hand to her and shouts: "Italiano, the dollar is counterfeit!". She told him: "Americano, syphilis naturale!".

[Bolt cutter]

"Americano, syphilis naturale!"

In World War I, the Russian military called syphilis "sister" - it was generously distributed by the then nurses .

[Pane Kohanku]

In World War I, the Russian military called syphilis "sister" - it was generously distributed by the then nurses

I readily believe!
I'm interested in the details of the portraits, Alexey. As far as I understand, either there were several similar portraits of Potemkin, or later they drew a "fotojab" ...
Here, apparently, is a historical portrait - Wikimedia Commons writes that this is Lumpy Sr. On the neck - the Order of St. George. Ribbons are worn by the orders of St. Andrew the First-Called and Alexander Nevsky.

And here is the portrait that the author inserted into the article.
Apparently it's brand new. Ribbons are worn by the orders of St. Andrew and St. George.
On the neck - already the Order of St. Anna. Yes, he had one too.

Another thing is interesting. This order was originally not Russian, but Holstein. It was founded by the father of the future Peter III after the death of his wife, the daughter of Peter the Great, Anna Petrovna.
The right to distribute that order was enjoyed by Tsarevich Pavel Petrovich. That is, St. Anna Potemkin was awarded on behalf of the heir. Although, apparently, with the filing of the mother. Wikipedia writes - one of his first awards, 1770.
In the future, Pavel quarreled with Potemkin, and hated him.

[Nikolay Malyugin]

But they offer children, they say, watch TV. They have already taken a lot from all sorts of modern nonsense. You can’t see the hands of statesmen.

[Reptiloid]

WHO CASH KNOWS! What are the intrigues against whom in the "creative" viper? Recently, it was possible in public life (during the NWO) to see unobtrusively, not aggressive, but constant praise of the Russian autocrats. Here we are talking about disrespect for Potemkin ..... Maybe the point is that the autocrats were not very correct? I didn’t watch the film, I won’t, irregular working hours. Just wanted to say that the answer to the questions can be completely different .... It is still not clear, for example, when they shot a film about Matilda, who wanted to denigrate or expose whom.

[Alex 1970]

Elderberry in the garden, uncle in Kyiv. Some kind of confusion, it is clear that Ernst is not the person who should lead the state channel. But what does syphilis and Potemkin have to do with it?

[Plantagenet]

To be continued.
Sorry, I'm not smart enough to write a normal comment

[Million]

Channel 1 works against Russia. What else can I say ..

[antiaircrafter]

On December 12, 2022, the series “Casanova in Russia. Secret mission.

I haven't watched it, but I'm sorry.

[sergo1914]

What was it? What have I just read? Potemkin - syphilis - Ernst. What is common here? An anxious woman who imagines herself to be the author of articles on VO? But what does VO have to do with it?

[populist]

All Russian culture is polluted by liberals. All this muck is possible only thanks to the highest patrons in the Kremlin.
I watched the beginning of the series just to get an idea. Foolishness, abomination and hack-work. Like the series "Chaliapin". I also watched the beginning. When I watch this, I read it on the Internet in parallel so as not to waste time.

[Reptiloid]

Quote: populist

All Russian culture is polluted by liberals. .....

Various groups of them swarm and try to get closer to the money ..... Museums, artists, concerts ..... But they still try to fight them in the same environment, sometimes results are visible

[north 2]

between the lines, the readable question of the author of the article is why a film about the very significant surname for Russia, Count Potemkin-Tavrichesky, has not yet been created, but a film about the adventures of the rogue Casanova in Russia, discrediting Russia, has been created, you can answer with a counter question and right on the forehead, - and why The teacher created a bed film "Matilda", discrediting the reputation of the institution of the Tsar and the Dynasty, but did not create a film about how Misha Tagged flunked Rayka in the hostel of Moscow State University? My answer is simple - because Shvydkoy-Ernst is still sitting in the Ministry of Culture and on television, and they are hanging pasta on us about not regulating the work of an artist, director, actor. In fact, there they regulate everything and follow the orders of liberalism, how and how to harm Russia.
It would be naivety itself to think that the departed Pugachevs, Galkins and Makarevichs left us a sterile stage, Yes, all sorts of Baskovs, Kirkorovs and silicone Babkins
falsely depicting Russian culture and patriots in and out of themselves, they will harm it no less than Russian culture and the Russian people, who openly despised the Pugachevs, Galkins and Makarevichs. Right now, from Friday to Sunday on TV, the covens of Kirkorov, Lazarev and this silicone Babkina went to dance.
By the way, bookstores are bursting with books by the brightest enemies of today's Russia, Bykov and Akunin, and all sorts of defectors there. So the film about Casanova in Russia very organically fits into all these anti-Russian programs. Yes, and the curators of these programs are well-known. All hope, maybe those who returned from the fronts of the NWO after the Victory will break off their horns. Although it should have been done yesterday...

[Master 2030]

What's with the syphilis? An ordinary well-known substance in the varieties of which the MO does not understand. A typical craft of the "great masters" of the Russian "cinema" of our time.

[north 2]

Quote: populist

All Russian culture is polluted by liberals. All this muck is possible only thanks to the highest patrons in the Kremlin.
I watched the beginning of the series just to get an idea. Foolishness, abomination and hack-work. Like the series "Chaliapin". I also watched the beginning. When I watch this, I read it on the Internet in parallel so as not to waste time.

after watching the first fifteen minutes of these films , I also did not watch them further . As for Chaliapin himself, in my opinion, his greatness as a singer-bass is artificially exalted and not only because of the limited number of competitors, his contemporaries. I adored Shtokolov-bass, for me the talent of a singer is higher than Chaliapin-bass. "Secular Linden", "Evening Ringing", "Shine, burn my star", not to mention the opera parts performed by Shtokolov - this is the peak of the peak. Or maybe it’s good that the liberals in their films have not yet reached Shtokolov, otherwise the great voice will begin to examine pastels through the sheet.
But after all, they can create good films without any sex scenes. Here are the series "Lector" with the wonderful Dmitry Pevtsov and Ekaterina Guseva and "Mutiny" with the magnificent Yuri Chursin and Lyubov Aksyonova - and for a total of 16 episodes not a single bed scene! And for what delights the audience in the comments and what high ratings and laudatory reviews for these series. And I recommend you watch...

[16112014nk]

Quote: Dmitry_7

Ernst should also be involved in the criminal case a long time ago

Ernst is just a performer. But who is the customer of all this dregs?

[BAI]

blackening the history of the Russian state!

Leviathan, Zuleikha opens her eyes, Bastards. Etc. The list is endless. Not the first, and most importantly - not the last film.

[dump22]

And in the series, he is a bribe taker, a sycophant and an embezzler ...

Does anyone else doubt that Potemkin was exactly like that?

Casanova visited Russia in 1765.
At that moment, Potemkin was a lieutenant of the Horse Guards and held a treasury position in his regiment.
Catherine, at that time, was mainly carried away by Grigory Orlov (he is already a count, prince and general-in-chief) and even thinks about marriage with him.

[ZAV69]

But what, for someone it’s a big secret that at the top of all federal channels, libertarian liberals have dug in, in other words, enemies of the people who sabotage everything that is possible? Well, there is no clear evidence to plant, remove it somewhere under a plausible pretext. The information front is now, as it were, one of the key ones.

[Ed1970]

In Russia, in general, art works very strangely. For example, the film "The Sun" might have prevented the war by showing the terrible truth about Donetsk, because for sure not all Ukrainians knew what was happening and could find out, but they spun it in the cinema and put it on the shelf.
At one time there was a socially important film "Tragedy in the style of rock", it could cause serious damage to the drug business in Russia, and the film was quickly "finished off".

[Ghost1]

Apparently, someone turned on the TV only recently, with hatching, as they say, it’s been like this on TV for a long time, because since the 90s everything Western has been inculcated in the country, and now some are surprised, and who did it all and why. At the top, they only talk about morality and ties, but in reality nothing changes and all garbage on TV and on the Internet continues to flow.

[flyer]

And what is better than programs on NTV like "New Russian Sensations" "Stars against Zelensky", where unnecessary artists threaten the camera? Federal channels spend money on all sorts of nonsense, on all sorts of nonsense, and there is no supervision over billions of dollars in spending. Moronic films and programs are a way to "cut" money. The order for the shooting was received, removed, the money was cashed.