British depleted uranium projectiles for Ukraine

49
British depleted uranium projectiles for Ukraine
Gun L30A1. Photo by the British Ministry of Defense


In early January, Britain announced its readiness to transfer to the Kyiv regime a small number of basic combat tanks Challenger 2. Together with such armored vehicles, ammunition for its standard weapons will be supplied. Recently it became known that such deliveries may include armor-piercing shells with a core of depleted uranium. These plans attracted a lot of attention and were also heavily criticized.



New Intentions


On March 21, British Deputy Secretary of Defense Annabelle Goldie revealed new details of plans to help the Kyiv regime. She said that together with a squadron (company) of Challenger-2 tanks, ammunition for their 120-mm guns would be sent to Ukraine. In particular, it is planned to supply armor-piercing feathered shells based on depleted uranium. According to the Deputy Minister, such products are an effective means of destroying modern armored vehicles.

A. Goldie's statement did not go unnoticed and caused a corresponding reaction. Thus, the Ukrainian side enthusiastically accepted the promised supply of ammunition - like any other help from abroad. Propaganda forces make another miracle out of foreign tanks and their regular shells.weaponwhich is sure to bring victory. The previous such "wunderwaffe" is predictably not remembered.

Russia did not ignore news about projectiles. The statements of the British Deputy Minister of Defense were commented on by several of our structures and officials, up to the Minister of Defense and the President. London is warned against ill-considered risky steps and warned of the negative consequences of such supplies.

In response to this, the British Ministry of Defense recalled that tank armor-piercing shells based on depleted uranium have nothing to do with nuclear weapons. In addition, uranium has been called a standard component of ammunition. At the same time, Russia was accused of attempting deliberate disinformation and speculation on the topic of military assistance.


Armor-piercing shells L23A1 and L26A1. Photo Forum.warthunder.com

It is curious that the British military department has so far only indicated the possibility of supplying existing armor-piercing shells along with their tanks. The number of such products for shipment, the timing of their provision, etc. while remain unknown. However, the Ministry of Defense could already draw up such plans, but is in no hurry to announce them. In addition, it cannot be ruled out that the British side will heed Russian warnings and revise its supply program.

Uranium nomenclature


The main armament of the modern British MBT Challenger 2 is the L30A1 gun developed by the Royal Ordnance Factory Nottingham. This is a 120 mm rifled gun with a 55 klb barrel. The breech and bolt of the gun are designed for the use of separate loading shots with a propellant charge in a burning cartridge case. Loading is done manually.

The ammunition load of the L30A1 gun includes a dozen shells for various purposes. Despite the common caliber, they are not compatible with standard NATO guns. Armor-piercing feathered sub-caliber projectiles (BOPS) comprise the bulk of the available range - six combat types and one training. There is also a high-explosive armor-piercing projectile with a plastic charge, training and smoke ammunition.

Based on depleted uranium, two types of British BOPS are made - L26A1 and L27A1. They were developed in the eighties and nineties as part of various stages of the CHARM (Challenger Armament) weapons modernization program. Due to the use of a specific material, it was possible to optimize the design of the armor-piercing core, as well as to improve the main combat characteristics and qualities.

The L26A1 projectile is a traditional BOPS design. This is a small-caliber product in the form of an elongated "needle" with a tail stabilizer. The projectile has an outer shell made of a soft alloy, a uranium core is placed inside the fire. The projectile is completed with a resettable aluminum leading device; a glass with an additional propelling charge is put on the stabilizer. The length of the projectile assembly is 525 mm, the total weight is 8,5 kg.


Loading shells L29A1 - a training analogue of the products L27A1 and L28A1. Photo by the US Department of Defense

The newer L27A1 projectile has a similar design and appearance, but has a longer length and different proportions, and also has an increased mass. The resettable master is generally similar to the one used in the previous project.

Depending on the propellant used, the L26A1 and L27A1 projectiles have an initial velocity of at least 1550-1600 m/s. High speed and a uranium core allow an older projectile to penetrate 2 mm of homogeneous armor at a distance of 443 km. A newer one in the same conditions overcomes a 522-mm barrier. In addition, depleted uranium provides a high armor impact.

Amazing factors


In the manufacture of BOPS, depleted uranium is used. This metal is a by-product (actually a waste) of uranium production for energy or nuclear weapons. During the processing and enrichment of natural uranium, radioactive isotopes are extracted and used. The remaining material mainly consists of uranium-238 and can be used in other areas.

Uranium has a high density - 19,05 g / cc. In this parameter, it is slightly inferior to tungsten and three times superior to steel alloys. In addition, uranium is pyrophoric: its small particles ignite spontaneously in air. As a by-product of the nuclear industry, it is relatively cheap and available in sufficient quantities. Finally, due to the enrichment process, such a "waste" is minimally radioactive and does not require special precautions, like enriched uranium.

Depleted uranium BOPS has several general advantages. So, due to the high density, the projectile of the required size can be as heavy as possible, which contributes to obtaining maximum kinetic energy. High speed and energy, combined with the mass and hardness of BOPS, contribute to an increase in the penetration of various obstacles. After passing through the armor, the projectile is destroyed, and small fragments hit the internal units of the target and its crew. In addition, uranium is capable of causing additional damage by igniting the particles.


Working with tank shots. Photo by the US Department of Defense

The use of depleted uranium has other features and consequences, and it is dangerous not only directly for the target when it is hit. Thus, all isotopes of uranium and a number of its compounds are toxic and pose a danger to all organs and systems of the human body. The ingress of uranium dust into the body provokes the development of various diseases. There is evidence of carcinogenic properties associated with the residual amount of radioactive isotopes. With all this, the destruction of the projectile with the formation of small particles contributes to the spread of toxic substances around the affected tank and increases the risks to the surrounding area and people.

The negative effects of the use of uranium projectiles are confirmed by scientific research. So, in a number of works, an increase in the number of oncological diseases was shown among the personnel who worked with such shells, as well as in the former war zones where they were used - in the territory of the former Yugoslavia and Iraq. As a consequence, armor-piercing depleted uranium ammunition has long been heavily criticized.

At the same time, other studies show no pronounced additional risks and consequences of using uranium projectiles. However, such scientific works raise a lot of questions and make them suspect that their authors are biased.

Opportunities and risks


Obviously, due to the announced deliveries of BOPS based on depleted uranium, the British side plans to increase the combat capability of the Challenger 2 MBTs being transferred. With the help of such ammunition, British tanks with Ukrainian crews will have to resist the Russian army. However, the effectiveness of such measures and their long-term consequences are in question.

The fact is that British-made uranium shells L26A1 and L27A1 are not new and have limited characteristics. In addition, these products and their features are well known abroad - and the necessary measures were taken to protect armored vehicles. As a result, the ability of old shells to hit modern Russian tanks is questionable. Even with a successful hit on the target, the ammunition will have to overcome dynamic protection and combined frontal barriers.


Challenger 2 is firing. Photo by the British Ministry of Defense

At the same time, the British Army has a newer L28A1 tungsten projectile with improved performance, but they are not going to supply it to Ukraine. It seems that the British side intends to help the Kyiv regime with tanks and shells, but does not want to share modern products. On the contrary, he will be handed over obsolete ammunition with a dubious reputation.

The uncertain fighting qualities and potential of foreign projectiles do not rule out further environmental and medical problems. In this regard, the Russian army will not only have to fight British-made tanks, but also take measures to neutralize the liberated area and eliminate the long-term uranium threat.

Dubious plans


Thus, foreign military-technical assistance for Ukraine continues and takes on new forms, as well as creates new risks and threats. Recently, a number of foreign states decided to transfer their tanks to the Kyiv regime, and now it is reported about the possible supply of ammunition for such equipment. Moreover, ammunition with dubious features and reputation.

So far, the UK has only announced its intention to supply shells with depleted uranium, but does not provide details. However, it is already clear that such supplies will have little military effect, but are quite capable of creating a serious threat to the local population and the environment. Therefore, the warnings from the Russian leadership are justified, and London should heed them.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    26 March 2023 04: 09
    We have had shells with uranium since 1982. Uranium is effective due to its high density. The core, which has pierced the armor, flies in already melted, in the air it ignites. And a sheaf of fire - burns everything inside. But even a 30 mm projectile with a uranium core, having broken through the armor of an armored personnel carrier / infantry fighting vehicle (it is small and cannot burn everything), will ruin both the crew and the landing force. They inhale uranium oxides and die either quickly (from heavy metal poisoning) or in a year or two, from oncology. And tungsten is lighter, it is refractory and gives inside - a directed sheaf of hot fragments. Less defeat.
    Ours did not use such ammunition, they proposed to ban them, but the impudent Saxons, France, and someone else - voted against.

    In addition, uranium is almost free: everyone who produces nuclear fuel or nuclear weapons is only too happy to get rid of it. It's just unmeasured.
    Just today, Putin said that we have hundreds of thousands of these munitions. But I think he was even modest. Together with 30 mm - there are millions of them.
    1. +4
      26 March 2023 04: 17
      a strong feeling that the "island" must be finished ...
      1. +13
        26 March 2023 04: 24
        Quote: Aerodrome
        a strong feeling that the "island" should be finished ..

        And how to do it? Maybe with a boot, like Khrushch knocking at the UN?
        1. -2
          26 March 2023 04: 44
          Wave "Poseidon" to launch, through the entire island, preferably. From North to South.
          1. -6
            26 March 2023 13: 38
            I have been suggesting for a long time: attach Poseidon to the Petrel and launch it to London)))
        2. -9
          26 March 2023 09: 28
          sabotage at their energy facilities, naturally, without declassifying Petrov and Bashirov, but using sleeper agents, you can bring down arrogance from a small British
          1. 0
            27 March 2023 16: 03
            an interesting experiment, look at how many people on the site are offended for Britain))) well, why be surprised then our general line was credited with a step forward two to the side three? (((
        3. +2
          26 March 2023 09: 55
          And how to do it? Maybe with a boot, like Khrushch knocking at the UN?

          There are no eggs, but how to knock without them?
        4. -6
          26 March 2023 14: 19
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          a strong feeling that the "island" should be finished ..

          And how to do it? Maybe with a boot, like Khrushch knocking at the UN?

          To do this, you need to use the "evil neighbor" Poland (stinking, but beloved wife). With winds from the east, use depleted uranium ammunition on the territory of Ukraine bordering Poland. The Poles will raise a howl, and then "we will see."
      2. +1
        26 March 2023 13: 34
        While the Islands do not lose anything, unlike the Russian Federation
        1. -3
          26 March 2023 17: 29
          Quote from: Alex_mech
          While the Islands do not lose anything, unlike the Russian Federation

          The islands have nothing to lose, but nothing to gain. And in general, all the costs of Britain associated with Ukraine will not bring her anything, well, Britain is located in the wrong place.
    2. +4
      26 March 2023 06: 31
      .
      And tungsten is lighter, it is refractory and gives inside - a directed sheaf of hot fragments

      Why is tungsten lighter than uranium? The article says the opposite, and rightly so.
      1. AUL
        +10
        26 March 2023 08: 09
        The fact is that British-made uranium shells L26A1 and L27A1 are not new and have limited characteristics. In addition, these products and their features are well known abroad - and the necessary measures were taken to protect armored vehicles. As a result, the ability of old shells to hit modern Russian tanks is questionable.
        Yes, of course, in the style of Cyril. "Junk, junk, inefficient..."
        1. 0
          26 March 2023 20: 30
          Quote from AUL
          The fact is that British-made uranium shells L26A1 and L27A1 are not new and have limited characteristics. In addition, these products and their features are well known abroad - and the necessary measures were taken to protect armored vehicles. As a result, the ability of old shells to hit modern Russian tanks is questionable.
          Yes, of course, in the style of Cyril. "Junk, junk, inefficient..."
          Or maybe it’s true, as someone wrote, that this is “artificial intelligence” ?! winked
          1. 0
            29 March 2023 14: 41
            Or am I missing something or something
            At the same time, the British Army has a newer L28A1 tungsten projectile with improved performance.
            It seems like an L28A1 armor-piercing projectile for a 105 mm cannon. sad
    3. -5
      26 March 2023 09: 58
      Quote: Sulla__Glorious
      We have had shells with uranium since 1982.

      In addition to shells with uranium, we also have Poseidons, Iskanders, Calibers, X-102s, etc., and all this is also with "depleted uranium".
    4. +3
      26 March 2023 13: 47
      What kind of nonsense? Firstly, no one seized bops with uranium from stacks, again. Secondly, at 30mi we don't have depleted uranium shells, two. Thirdly, the story about attempts to ban is your own mare's nonsense (remember the "forbidden" cluster munitions). Fourth, tungsten is heavier. KG/AM.
    5. +1
      26 March 2023 17: 59
      We don't have 30mm uranium shells. At all.
  2. -6
    26 March 2023 04: 49
    British depleted uranium projectiles for Ukraine

    It's time to send Britain to the bottom with a "present" from Poseidon.
    It is a pity for ordinary people, but they themselves, not knowing that they lead to the death of existence itself.
    There was not a single State of the Earth, where they did not poke their "" nose in affairs in foreign States. Unfortunately, they feel unpunished and have in addition impudence and arrogance. Hence the verdict - erase them from the map of the Earth for all the accumulated sins for centuries!
    1. +3
      26 March 2023 13: 40
      What if they rip you off? They have something.
      1. -7
        26 March 2023 13: 51
        Quote from: Alex_mech
        What if they rip you off? They have something.

        How many do they have and what condition is it in? And in what condition are the carriers?
        1. +1
          26 March 2023 20: 32
          Quote: Ruslan_3
          Quote from: Alex_mech
          What if they rip you off? They have something.

          How many do they have and what condition is it in? And in what condition are the carriers?
          belay Do you really have a desire to test these questions on yourself and your loved ones, or do you know for sure that your threats will not come true and there is nothing to be afraid of?! winked
      2. -2
        26 March 2023 22: 04
        Look at the map of the Russian Federation .... and at the map of the UK. There will be enough washing machines on the island for the whole mother Russia. And we have enough.))) And for kings and loaders.
        1. -1
          27 March 2023 05: 46
          Look at the map of the Russian Federation .... and at the map of the UK. There will be enough washing machines on the island for the whole mother Russia. And we have enough.))) And for kings and loaders.
          1. If you look at the globe, it turns out that the flat map is distorted for ease of use and the northern countries are not so big in relation to those that are closer to the equator.
          2. Do you write from the taiga? Most of the population is concentrated in the line of cities, mainly in the European part of the territory.
          3. I don’t know about you, but I’m not very happy even with the fact that they all die, but we have someone who survives
    2. 0
      26 March 2023 18: 10
      what about scotch whiskey? maybe, for starters, we will present an ultimatum that in the event of delivery, we will launch a nuclear strike?
    3. 0
      27 March 2023 19: 15
      Even Iran, having received nuclear weapons and their means of delivery, will not be the first to launch a nuclear strike on Washington or London. Because he wants to live This light.
      The person who writes about the (first) use of nuclear weapons in London (a country with nuclear weapons) has either not come out of puberty (still not capable of sound thinking) or has mental problems (no longer able to think adequately). The fact of a guaranteed retaliatory strike (even before our strike reaches the target) does not occur to him. Exactly like the death in a nuclear fire of his wife, children, parents.
  3. +10
    26 March 2023 04: 53
    Quote: Sulla__Glorious
    We have had shells with uranium since 1982. Uranium is effective due to its high density. The core, which has pierced the armor, flies in already melted, in the air it ignites. And a sheaf of fire - burns everything inside. But even a 30 mm projectile with a uranium core, having broken through the armor of an armored personnel carrier / infantry fighting vehicle (it is small and cannot burn everything), will ruin both the crew and the landing force. They inhale uranium oxides and die either quickly (from heavy metal poisoning) or in a year or two, from oncology. And tungsten is lighter, it is refractory and gives inside - a directed sheaf of hot fragments. Less defeat.
    Ours did not use such ammunition, they proposed to ban them, but the impudent Saxons, France, and someone else - voted against.

    In addition, uranium is almost free: everyone who produces nuclear fuel or nuclear weapons is only too happy to get rid of it. It's just unmeasured.
    Just today, Putin said that we have hundreds of thousands of these munitions. But I think he was even modest. Together with 30 mm - there are millions of them.

    In fact, when voting at the UN on a proposal for a deeper study of the harm from ammunition with depleted uranium, the Russian Federation abstained ...
  4. +7
    26 March 2023 06: 54
    the ability of old shells to hit modern Russian tanks is questionable
    What does the author mean by "modern"
    T-90?
    So they are available in homeopathic quantities
    And for the T-62, such a projectile is quite enough
    As for the T-72
  5. -1
    26 March 2023 06: 55
    To be honest, in recent days, probably only the lazy did not raise this topic. In my opinion, even a schoolboy already knows what a depleted uranium sub-caliber projectile is and what threatens the ecology and human health with its use. But anyway, thanks to the author for the work done.
    1. +1
      26 March 2023 07: 06
      Quote: rotmistr60
      threatens the environment and human health, its use.

      This is what is scary. There will be less harm on the battlefield than from the subsequent infection of civilians.
      1. -10
        26 March 2023 07: 18
        Firstly - about the ecology of crap
        We have had such shells since the early 80s
        Secondly - even if so - what do we care?
        The shells will be used on the territory of Ukraine!
        So to hell with them, ukra...

        PS: there are no civilians, this is nonsense
    2. -6
      26 March 2023 08: 31
      You're right. But here's what I don't like. The President, and after him the "choir of like-minded people" when discussing the harm of uranium, flap their wings on the topic "Oh, what harm the use of uranium will cause to the famous Ukrainian black soil"!. And what, gentlemen, the decision to voluntarily join four new entities has already been cancelled. Fighting is now taking place on RUSSIAN territory, and, apparently, it will not move anywhere from there, at least this year. It would seem a trifle - but there is negligence, and this is a bad sign.
      1. +5
        26 March 2023 13: 43
        Yes, no one believes in the "Russianness" of these areas. Neither in the Kremlin nor outside its walls
  6. -3
    26 March 2023 07: 04
    The ancestors of the Anglos were still wiser than their heirs
  7. -5
    26 March 2023 10: 55
    Quote: Sulla__Glorious
    The core that has pierced the armor flies in already melted, in the air it ignites

    It would be interesting to know why uranium melted - from friction against air)))))
    after the explosion of the warhead, the pieces scatter with a high damaging effect and pollution of the territory. Which further leads to an embargo of wheat from Ukraine.
    This is the first stage of the surrender of Ukraine to its "allies"
    1. +4
      26 March 2023 13: 43
      What explosion? What other combat unit?
  8. -5
    26 March 2023 12: 45
    I propose to transport the captured shells to Syria and distribute them to the locals so that they can beat the American bases ...
    1. 0
      27 March 2023 06: 50
      Do you think it will be effective when the locals throw such shells as a grenade? ))) Or what are you going to shoot them from?
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. +3
    26 March 2023 13: 33
    it cannot be ruled out that the British side will heed Russian warnings and revise its supply program.

    Why did it happen? Or in other words, "what will happen?".
  11. +2
    26 March 2023 14: 05
    There is little environmental harm from uranium. Where wouldоThe greatest danger after the war will be toxic chemicals, from explosives to unburned plastic.

    Combat damage from such shells will only occur during large tank battles, which have not yet been observed.
  12. -3
    26 March 2023 14: 07
    On September 16, 2005, due to a navigational error caused by the irresponsibility of a number of Air Force generals, a Russian Su-27 fighter crashed, carrying 4 missiles and air cannon shells containing depleted uranium. https://lenta.ru/news/2005/09/22/uran/. And what? The Russian Federation paid Lithuania "The damage caused by the Russian Su-27 fighter, which crashed in Lithuania on September 15, is estimated at 29 thousand euros. This figure was announced on Wednesday in the General Prosecutor's Office of Lithuania. accident, as well as the police and fire protection departments of Lithuania",". That's where it all ended...
    1. 0
      26 March 2023 18: 14
      Achinea complete.
      Uranium is covered with a protective layer of another metal. Experts suggested that the found uranium used in warheads of Su-27 missiles to increase penetration power rockets. No radioactive contamination of the soil was recorded.
  13. BAI
    0
    26 March 2023 16: 48
    London is warned against ill-considered risky steps and warned of the negative consequences of such supplies.

    THERE WILL BE NO CONSEQUENCES!
    The cowardice of the government in the Russian Federation is obvious and there is no point in even discussing it
  14. -6
    26 March 2023 17: 22
    The most intelligible option is to arrange the dumping of similar waste off the coast of foggy Albion. If they don't understand it, then they need to explain it differently.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. +1
    26 March 2023 18: 35
    For a month now they have been rushing around with these "uranium" shells, as if they were some kind of weapon of mass destruction. I will tell a secret for someone, but depleted uranium shells have been used by many countries and have been for quite a long time. They were also used by the armed forces of the USSR (3BM32 "Vant"), they are also used by the RF Armed Forces - 3BM59 "Lead-1", which is included in the T-80BVM, T-90M and T-72B3 ammunition.
  17. +1
    27 March 2023 08: 31
    Quote from: NickShel
    They were also used by the armed forces of the USSR (3BM32 "Vant"), they are also used by the RF Armed Forces - 3BM59 "Lead-1", which is included in the T-80BVM, T-90M and T-72B3 ammunition.


    And in more detail? Where and when were domestic BOPS with uranium cores used, in what conflicts?
    And that is, there is an opinion that there are such shells, but they were practically not used. So, a stash for a very rainy day.
    Or do you have infa that the RF Armed Forces used such ammunition in the NVO zone?
    Then even the Papuans and penguins in Antarctica would know about it. But Western media
    such - no gu-gu.
  18. 0
    27 March 2023 08: 37
    Quote: Humanoid
    It would be interesting to know why uranium melted - from friction against air)))))


    In a collision with armor, kinetic energy will turn into thermal energy.
    The core is the warhead. There is no explosive in an armor-piercing projectile, there is nothing to explode.
  19. 0
    27 March 2023 08: 42
    Quote: -Igor-
    1. If you look at the globe, it turns out that the flat map is distorted for ease of use and the northern countries are not so big in relation to those that are closer to the equator.
    2. Do you write from the taiga? Most of the population is concentrated in the line of cities, mainly in the European part of the territory.


    1. Is England close to the equator? Tin. laughing
    Why look at a map if there is accurate data on the area of ​​any country?
    2. The concentration of population in metropolitan areas (and indeed the percentage of urbanization) in England, as in the United States, is much higher than in the Russian Federation.
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. 0
    28 March 2023 06: 05
    As long as all this will be unpunished for NATO, then at least draw red lines, and tanks and aircraft, and tactical ones will be supplied. It would be strange to expect otherwise.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"