President of Belarus: As soon as depleted uranium ammunition explodes on Russian positions, you will see the answer, it will be a lesson for the whole planet

123
President of Belarus: As soon as depleted uranium ammunition explodes on Russian positions, you will see the answer, it will be a lesson for the whole planet

The Belarusian president reacted to the statement of the Deputy head of the military department of Britain, Annabelle Goldie, about the intention to supply Ukraine with depleted uranium ammunition. Recall that earlier the Kremlin reacted to these intentions, pointing out that this is an extra step towards the escalation of the Ukrainian conflict and Russia will be forced to respond to the use of shells with uranium. In Britain, they were quick to announce that this was "standard ammunition", which could not be attributed to a "dirty bomb" or something like that.

Alexander Lukashenko spoke about this as follows:



As soon as the depleted uranium ammunition explodes on Russian positions, everyone will see the answer. He will be terrible. And this will be a lesson for the entire planet.

According to the Belarusian president, everyone knows that Russia has far more than just depleted uranium.

Alexander Lukashenko:

They (in the West and in Ukraine) will wait until Russia supplies us with shells with real uranium. Do they want it there?

Today, the Belarusian leader visited Khatyn, where the Nazis, including Ukrainians, committed a war crime during the Great Patriotic War, killing more than a hundred local civilians.

In the book of records of the memorial complex, the President of the Republic of Belarus wrote that what he saw was amazing. Earlier, official Minsk made a statement that Belarus and Belarusians will never accept the revival of Nazism and fascism in any form.
123 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. -42
        22 March 2023 14: 30
        The extraction of uranium ore in many deposits is carried out by a mine or quarry method. People have been working there for years and certainly get their dose of radiation. The radioactivity of the depleted uranium core is 40% lower than the ore. According to some scientists, you need to carry a piece of the core in your pocket for years in order to receive an exorbitant dose of radiation. References to the growth of cancer in the places of application, do not find exact scientific evidence of what exactly caused it. So understand who and what to believe. sad
        1. +14
          22 March 2023 14: 36
          The dust seems to be dangerous .. When a projectile hits the armor with a crane or a uranium house hits the armor, uranium dust seems to be formed and inhaled ..
          1. -8
            22 March 2023 16: 59
            I read somewhere that there is a little-known fact, namely: at the end of the Second World War, Germany, faced with a shortage of tungsten for sub-caliber shells, used the accumulated uranium reserves for them. Therefore, many tons of uranium are scattered across the territory of the EU at that time, and this amount is many times greater than what was used in Yugoslavia and Iraq. I don't know how true this is.
            1. 0
              23 March 2023 16: 31
              What is minus a comrade? Indeed, a certain Herr Albert Speer mentioned this in passing. That in connection with the break in the supply of tungsten, an order was given to use uranium. There are a couple of nuances:
              1 - Uranium was brought from Belgium in the form of ore. Whether this ore was processed and used in projectiles is not documented. Some vague information about the use in an aircraft gun is not a fact.
              2 - In addition to Speer, no one seems to have confirmed this documented. And to believe the memoirs written in prison? well, like that. After the war, the Nazis tried in every way to whitewash themselves.
              3 - If shells with luminous uranium, and even depleted uranium, were captured in the warehouses of Germany during the war, this would be a resonant fact that every pioneer would know about.
              1. +1
                27 March 2023 12: 07
                And what about the statistics on Serbia and Iraq? By the way, the Amer warriors got sniffed too, but they try to hide it.
          2. +2
            23 March 2023 07: 11
            Our warehouses are also full of depleted uranium ammunition. But we are unlikely to use them in Ukraine as long as we hope to win. Then we ourselves will have to clean the territory from this dirty trick. But when we get to Poland .... laughing
        2. HAM
          +32
          22 March 2023 14: 40
          My uncle drove ore to Smolino on Kraz, died of oncology at 50, his wife died even younger, also from oncology .... what more evidence is needed? There is a uranium mine in Smolino (Ukraine), and many people from the village get sick, not at all with the flu ...
          1. -7
            22 March 2023 16: 40
            his wife died even younger, also from oncology

            It's sad, but she didn't carry ore, did she? I know many cases of death from oncology, none of them had anything to do with radioactive materials.
            1. +8
              22 March 2023 16: 50
              Perhaps she washed his things, that is, she was in direct contact with uranium dust.
            2. HAM
              +9
              22 March 2023 16: 56
              She was a nurse at the first-aid post of the same mine.
            3. +1
              23 March 2023 07: 27
              When most metallurgy plants smoked without any purification of emissions, so much poison fell on our heads that oncology became mass without any uranium. Recall N. Tagil or Angarsk. IN THE USSR for peaceful purposes (!!!) more than two hundred underground nuclear explosions were carried out. Even the northern rivers tried to "turn" to the south, for which they pierced the channel with three nuclear explosions in the north of the Perm region. But they did underground explosions even in the central regions of the European part of the country, where they occasionally allowed contamination of the area. And near Igarka, they even had to evacuate and relocate the village due to a breakthrough of gases from the explosion. sad
          2. +1
            23 March 2023 19: 01
            Research data. Individual cases cannot be evidence.
        3. +16
          22 March 2023 14: 52
          How did you decide what exactly was the mine or quarry method? This past. There are more interesting ways, namely the in-situ leaching method. Gentlemen of unbelievers should be sent as guinea pigs for testing. They do not believe, let them prove the opposite by personal experience. All transuranium metals are toxic, and radioactivity is not particularly needed there, and so the muck is rare.
          1. +2
            23 March 2023 07: 32
            This past.
            This is not the past and mining and quarrying continues to take place. Yes, the leaching method is the safest for mining, especially against mine. But not everywhere it is cost-effective and continues to be mined in quarries. winked
        4. +8
          22 March 2023 15: 08
          The radioactivity of the depleted uranium core is 40% lower than the ore.

          What is the difference for the one to whom the uranium got inside the body? Cesium is also not particularly dangerous to the body until it gets inside. Although, apparently, you didn’t catch the Chernobyl events and don’t know how it is when the garden that you considered safe, suddenly became deadly dangerous for the crop grown on it. Yes, and the mushrooms that you ate before, suddenly became a death sentence for the mushroom picker.
          1. +3
            23 March 2023 07: 38
            Although apparently you did not catch the Chernobyl events
            Horon, the number 53 behind my name, means the year of birth. It is, just in case. And besides, I had to serve on a submarine with nuclear weapons on board and terribly poisonous fuel (heptyl) in rockets. Basic knowledge and experience... wink
        5. fiv
          +16
          22 March 2023 15: 13
          Uranium itself is a terribly unhealthy metal for the body, in the sense of being poisonous. Also, it is very difficult to excrete from the body. It is alpha active. Let its radioactivity be low, I mean depleted uranium, but even a speck of uranium, being in the tissues of the body, will emit each alpha particle directly into living tissue, causing radiation and oncological, and genetic consequences. And being close to a hermetically sealed piece of depleted uranium is, yes, safe.
        6. +14
          22 March 2023 15: 50
          The radioactivity of the depleted uranium core is 40% lower than the ore.

          And what about radioactivity? All heavy metals have their own toxicity - remember polonium and Litvinenko. Since uranium perfectly interacts with both oxygen and water, its soluble oxides and hydroxides easily get into food and into the respiratory tract, where they create conditions for mutations without any radiation. So the answer to the use of uranium shells, it is perfectly legal to use tactical nuclear weapons. The consequences are almost the same.
          1. 0
            23 March 2023 22: 16
            Moreover, it is desirable for Britain, as the main sponsor of this conflict.
        7. -2
          23 March 2023 08: 09
          Alexander 53, where are you broadcasting from? Either he missed all the physics lessons at school, which is unlikely, or a hard-nosed Banderite.
        8. 0
          24 March 2023 11: 58
          That's right. And yet the supply of such power supplies is a bad form!
        9. Urs
          0
          27 March 2023 10: 45
          Well, as far as I know, the main radioactive and chemical damage is caused by radioactive dust after the use of this ammunition. But just this dust tends to accumulate in the body, which leads to radioactive and chemical poisoning. Research in the Chernobyl zone confirms this.
      2. +10
        22 March 2023 14: 35
        ........... the answer, it will be a lesson for the whole planet

        I would like to see the results of this lesson in the countries where these ammunition will come from.
      3. +2
        22 March 2023 14: 41
        the answer may imply irreversible consequences for the Britons

        here Lukashenka voiced the old dream of Belarus - to get full possession of nuclear weapons ..
        1. +6
          22 March 2023 14: 59
          an old dream of Belarus
          what for? Nearby there is the Russian Federation, de facto we are one country.
    2. Maz
      +8
      22 March 2023 14: 16
      In the background - Medvedei and Lavrov are roaring over the USA after signing agreements with comrade SI
    3. 0
      22 March 2023 18: 06
      The most interesting thing is that he said: "... if they explode ...". Housewives also think that the uranium core can explode and make a small but vigorous EXPLOSION! laughing
  2. -14
    22 March 2023 13: 58
    Uranium like bops))
    How can they explode in some positions?)
    1. +19
      22 March 2023 14: 03
      When it wears down, it causes radioactive contamination of the area ... There is a report on the use in Iraq.
      Sincerely
      1. +12
        22 March 2023 14: 25
        + tank crews also suffer - those who use this muck (although Khryakov is not sorry) - I'm talking about the impact! radiation reaches 60% of ordinary uranium. there are already precedents when they shot at Yugoslavia
        1. +8
          22 March 2023 14: 31
          Yes exactly! Dust containing uranium enters the respiratory and digestive systems. Like all heavy metals, uranium is very difficult to remove from the body. It's toxic by itself, plus radioactive...
          Sincerely
        2. +2
          22 March 2023 15: 16


          N yes! The hole is what you need - like "through the oil"
      2. +9
        22 March 2023 14: 27
        Quote: nobody75
        When it wears off, it causes radioactive contamination of the area ..

        Not radioactive, but toxic.
        Its toxic-chemical activity is much more dangerous than radioactivity. Although its toxicity is less dangerous than that of compounds of mercury, arsenic, radium and a bunch of our "companions".
        In Iraq, BOPS of small calibers (20-30mm) made the toxic problem, of which more than half a million were produced.
        1. +9
          22 March 2023 16: 00
          Although its toxicity is less dangerous than that of compounds of mercury, arsenic, radium and a bunch of our "companions".

          A little wrong. The inherent toxicity of heavy elements with unstable nuclei (DLM-50) is measured in micrograms, while mercury, arsenic and other elements you listed, it is measured in milligrams per kilogram of weight, THAT IS THREE ORDERS MINIMUM! DLM-100 differs by 4-5 orders of magnitude, since mercury and arsenic can be removed from the body, but uranium, polonium, curium and others ARE NEVER OUT!!! Just heavy elements kill LONG.
          1. +4
            22 March 2023 16: 29
            Quote: Leader_Barmaleev
            A bit wrong.

            Yes.
            Then you can dig even deeper. Not sure if this will be interesting.
            By itself, Uranus is not toxic, like mercury (it used to be swallowed in a volume of about 20 ml with intestinal obstruction and lived for a long time). Compounds of these metals, their oxides, salts, etc. are toxic.
            It is also slightly incorrect that the compounds of the heavy metals and metalloids (arsenic, for example) indicated by you are never displayed. It is more correct to say that they are COMPLETELY not displayed. A lot depends on the route of administration, metabolic characteristics, age ...
            Question for an article.
            1. +1
              23 March 2023 11: 15
              Question for an article

              Moreover, for a serious scientific article ... I'm afraid there will soon be a lot of statistical material ...
              Sincerely
      3. -1
        22 March 2023 14: 34
        When he grinds off - causes radioactive contamination of the area.
        Who sharpens it? You have to rub it and it starts to radiate? Reminds me of the ebonite wand... belay But they write that they are dangerous even for tank crews because of the dust that flies off them.
        1. +6
          22 March 2023 15: 17
          When the crowbar breaks through the armor, it grinds ...
          Sincerely
          1. +1
            23 March 2023 07: 03
            Elijah, thanks for the clarification. And let me expand our understanding of the process: The process of destruction of the armor is accompanied by grinding the uranium blank into dust and igniting it in air on the other side of the armor (see Pyrophoricity). winked
      4. +1
        23 March 2023 11: 59
        This means Lukashenka thinks that this should be an atomic explosion, and not breaking through equipment))). If he was in the know, he should have said "APPLIED", and not "EXPLODED")))))
    2. +9
      22 March 2023 14: 04
      Therefore, the dad is not afraid to say what he said, and the uranium scrap will arrive, there can be no doubt what our boss will answer here is a question, I don’t want to be a visionary, but they will probably convene a meeting of the UN Security Council, in fact, this will end.
    3. +5
      22 March 2023 14: 11
      Well, they seem to have an armor effect, explosive
      1. +7
        22 March 2023 14: 33
        It is poisonous, heats up strongly, "dusts" poisonously ... in general, there is little joy.
        Hello Roman soldier
        1. +1
          22 March 2023 15: 54
          hi Vitya! Yes, what joys are there when such crap in the forehead
          1. +1
            22 March 2023 17: 53
            On the forehead, she doesn’t necessarily break through something ... but that’s how it is, a strong, harmful thing.
            There is also a lot of "dirt" from it and for many years, alas.
      2. +6
        22 March 2023 14: 58
        Quote: novel xnumx
        Well, they seem to have an armor effect, explosive

        Exactly the same as the 3BM60 "Lead-2 DU".
        "Vtsryvopodobny" correctly called pyrophoric. This is when relatively small particles of "shavings" of uranium ignite spontaneously, and when scattered, they can damage and ignite surrounding objects.
        Just like cerium in a lighter's flint, magnesium, aluminum.
    4. +4
      22 March 2023 14: 19
      235 seems to be used in shells. Dust comes from the explosion. Children with two heads are then born. The Challenger cannot penetrate the T-90 with its rifled barrel. Uranium rod compensate. We are waiting for Poseidon in the case in return.
    5. +13
      22 March 2023 14: 19
      Annex II to the 1980 Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material classifies depleted uranium as Category XNUMX nuclear materials. We are not talking about nuclear explosions, we are talking about vast territories contaminated with uranium. Below the link is one of the few materials about the consequences, just an article by a journalist, if you look at things and look for information on this topic, you will see stunning, discouraging facts in terms of the scale of the consequences.
      Read on WWW.KP.RU: https://www.kp.ru/daily/26241/3122383/
      1. +8
        22 March 2023 14: 38
        This is not about nuclear explosions, we are talking about vast territories contaminated with uranium

        this is a long-term negative factor and the British know this well ... and they shit ..
      2. +8
        22 March 2023 14: 43
        Quote: Jura
        We are not talking about nuclear explosions, we are talking about vast territories contaminated with uranium.

        Depleted uranium-238 is a by-product of the production of enriched uranium-235. Uranium ore passes through hundreds of centrifuges, and the output is 11% enriched uranium and 89% depleted uranium, with which something must be done. Invented for use in armor-piercing shells (and do not need to be disposed of).
        Ways of uranium poisoning are skin contact (uranium shrapnel in the explosion of a projectile or tank). Inhalation of uranium dust, which is formed during the burning of shells. And the third way: contaminated water and land, producing poisoned fruits. To understand what the Anglo-Saxons are doing, what horror they bring to the population of the planet, you need to know not to forget that the half-life of uranium is 4,5 billion years. But that doesn't stop Satanists from using it.
        1. 0
          22 March 2023 16: 04
          Quote: carpenter
          Ways of uranium poisoning are skin contact (uranium shrapnel in the explosion of a projectile or tank). Inhalation of uranium dust, which is formed during the burning of shells. And the third way: contaminated water and land, producing poisoned fruits. To understand what the Anglo-Saxons are doing, what horror they bring to the population of the planet, you need to know not to forget that the half-life of uranium is 4,5 billion years. But that doesn't stop Satanists from using it.

          Yes, that's exactly what we're talking about.
        2. +4
          22 March 2023 17: 06
          So they have already done this in Yugoslavia and Iraq, has anyone been punished for this? I doubt.
          1. 0
            23 March 2023 09: 43
            I’ll clarify so that you don’t doubt: no one suffered any punishment.
        3. +2
          23 March 2023 19: 21
          The half-life of potassium-40 is 1,3 billion years. It is found in bananas. However, these two facts do not interfere with eating bananas.
    6. 0
      22 March 2023 14: 59
      When the uranium core of the BOPS enters the armor, an exothermic reaction between uranium and steel begins, the reaction products are sprayed in the form of fine dust, this is the danger. If the "scrap" enters the ground, God bless it, if necessary, you can dig it out.
      1. -4
        22 March 2023 15: 21
        When the uranium core of the BOPS enters the armor, an exothermic reaction begins between uranium and steel

        This is something new in inorganic chemistry ... it's nothing that uranium briquettes are molded in steel molds. Uranium is very heavy and strong metal, what can be the reaction between metals? If only a chain nuclear. Well, okay Lukashenka, whose shells with uranium explode ...
        1. +1
          22 March 2023 15: 48
          Quote: Konnick
          When the uranium core of the BOPS enters the armor, an exothermic reaction begins between uranium and steel

          This is something new in inorganic chemistry ... it's nothing that uranium briquettes are molded in steel molds. Uranium is very heavy and strong metal, what can be the reaction between metals? If only a chain nuclear. Well, okay Lukashenka, whose shells with uranium explode ...

          Well, it was necessary to learn chemistry and physics, otherwise their uranium scraps explode in positions.
    7. 0
      22 March 2023 15: 18
      Your position is covered by a tank, you are next to it and a bops flew into it. How much time will you have to put on the missing respirator or gas mask? Where is the guarantee that the water that you will drink in the database zone has not been poisoned by uranium salts? In addition, the tank and its crew can also be in position, in the case of maintaining a database.
      1. 0
        22 March 2023 15: 46
        Your position is covered by a tank, you are next to it and a bops flew into it. How much time will you have to put on the missing respirator or gas mask?


        Crowbars are made from depleted uranium, in your opinion tankers should be in lead shorts when using these shells. Depleted uranium is even less radioactive than uranium ore. It is even used as ballast instead of lead in the keel on expensive sailing yachts.
  3. 0
    22 March 2023 14: 06
    The test of the new vigorous on Novaya Zemlya, for example, the small United Kingdom will feel strongly. At the same time, the Scandinavians will "reset" the desire to enter Natu.

    Not strong in missile ballistics, but you can launch a "suspiciously new carrier" from North Korea and throw it over New Zealand over Australia, as if hinting at a new range
    1. +5
      22 March 2023 14: 17
      Quote: lubesky
      from North Korea to launch a "suspicious new carrier"

      Kim will easily launch ... But I doubt very much about Novaya Zemlya .... hi
      1. +4
        22 March 2023 14: 21
        Quote from Uncle Lee
        But about the New Earth I doubt very much ....


        And it would be time already, even yesterday! hi
        1. 0
          22 March 2023 14: 45
          And it would be time already, even yesterday!

          so that the mice hide under the broom ..
      2. 0
        22 March 2023 14: 59
        Quote from Uncle Lee
        But about the New Earth I doubt very much ...

        Norwegians are still shaking at the mention of it, but the government, at the behest of the US, has forgotten.
    2. 0
      23 March 2023 19: 24
      Shall we hit our territory so that the enemies are scared? P.S. And what can be proved in this way? Are the Russian Strategic Missile Forces armed with nuclear weapons? So there are a few doubters
    3. +1
      23 March 2023 19: 35
      Where does the confidence come from that Kim is eager to carry chestnuts from the fire for his northern neighbor? He certainly has a funny hairstyle, but he is hardly a fool
  4. +2
    22 March 2023 14: 14
    statement by the deputy head of the military department of Britain Annabelle Goldie about intentions to supply Ukraine with depleted uranium ammunition
    London is the number one target for Russia's nuclear forces.
    "London Must Be Destroyed"
    ---
    Then the text from the English textbook:
    London is the capital of Great Britain
    will make students laugh. bully
    1. 0
      22 March 2023 14: 16
      Quote: flicker
      London must be destroyed"

      Londinium? Just like Carthage itself. And Byzantium must be returned to the bosom of the Church!
    2. +2
      22 March 2023 14: 44
      London must be destroyed

      It's an open air museum! there are so many valuables pulled from all over the world ... It will be sad - London was not really bombed ...
      1. -2
        23 March 2023 01: 30
        there are so many valuables from all over the world
        Yes, but it seems that they will have to, so that they do not steal the remaining values ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbin the world.
    3. +1
      22 March 2023 17: 14
      Well, you compared the Donetsk tankers and the children of Peskov and many other children.
  5. -3
    22 March 2023 14: 15
    Already discussed here
    A pure PR move, since no radioactivity was counted, only the toxicity of armor-piercing scrap
  6. +2
    22 March 2023 14: 15
    President of Belarus: As soon as depleted uranium ammunition explodes on Russian positions, you will see the answer, it will be a lesson for the whole planet
    . Loud, but... what can be done? How will/can they answer, really?
    1. +1
      22 March 2023 14: 19
      And this is not a nuclear strike, but a new Chernobyl for sure.
  7. -3
    22 March 2023 14: 18
    Zircon or Dagger to any British Reactor!
    1. +1
      22 March 2023 14: 25
      Quote from yasel
      Zircon or Dagger to any British Reactor!


      And what will be the surprise of the entire West that Americans are not ready to die even for their old stepmother...
      1. +3
        22 March 2023 14: 46
        Americans are not ready to die even for an old stepmother ...

        plaid cowboy shirt closer to the body...
  8. -1
    22 March 2023 14: 20
    Where is the news about the train with the t-55? This is the answer so the answer!
  9. +4
    22 March 2023 14: 24
    As a preventive measure, you can hit the British embassy in Kuev with the Dagger.
  10. 0
    22 March 2023 14: 28
    Alexander Lukashenko spoke about this as follows:

    As soon as the depleted uranium ammunition explodes on Russian positions, everyone will see the answer. He will be terrible. And this will be a lesson for the entire planet.
    The whole world is in ruins, but then ... recourse
  11. +8
    22 March 2023 14: 28
    Thank you dad for the specifics .. otherwise the conspiracies are tired!
  12. +3
    22 March 2023 14: 35
    The topic about biolaboratories in Ukraine is more impressive, but they also managed to merge it
  13. 0
    22 March 2023 14: 37
    Give Alexander Grigorievich a nuclear loaf already, he will certainly launch it as intended.
    1. 0
      22 March 2023 15: 03
      So the Polonaises are marching in friendly formation ...
  14. +6
    22 March 2023 14: 42
    Responsibility is needed to answer, and domestic officials have been struggling with it since the fifty-third year, and they fought successfully.
    So the big question is, what will be the scary answer, and what lesson are we talking about.
    1. 0
      22 March 2023 14: 59
      No importa tanto cuál será la respuesta aterradora o demoledora si realmente dan una respuesta así, muy aleccionadora para esas potencias occidentales engreídas y arrogantes que desprecian y discriminan todo do lo ruso.
  15. +5
    22 March 2023 14: 47
    Regarding Khatyn, by the way, I remember watching one documentary film, they said that all the participants were identified, but during the Soviet era, shortly after the Second World War, the then chairman of the Communist Party of the Republic of the Ukrainian SSR knelt in high offices and begged not to disclose the names of the killers. Because he was afraid that a civil war of the BSSR would break out against the Ukrainian SSR and the Baltic states. When all Soviet citizens would have learned that the executioners were not the Germans, but the nationalists-collaborators, they set fire, and they were behind the machine guns, and not only Khatyn, but hundreds of the same villages were destroyed, with special cruelty. Of course, the operations were planned by the Germans as part of the fight against partisans, and a large proportion of the performers were local Nazis, about SS detachments, such as Dirlewanger and other Brandenburgs and all kinds of Sonder commands and Einsatz groups, and so everyone knows. We haven't forgotten anything!
    1. 0
      22 March 2023 16: 56
      Regarding Khatyn, by the way, I remember watching one documentary film, they told me there ....

      It goes through the section "Legends and Myths" in the literal sense of the word, there is this film of yours.
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Хатынь#Легенды_и_мифы
      The real documents about those events have long been declassified.
      https://web.archive.org/web/20180417020928/http://jivebelarus.net/files/books/Khatyn-Tragedy-and-Memory.pdf
      and journalists continue to rewrite myths from each other, they are too lazy to figure out even such a well-known tragedy, it’s easier to rewrite.

      the Belarusian newspaper “For the Glory of the Motherland” published an interview with Viktor Glazkov, a lieutenant colonel in the reserve and a judge in the case of Vasyura[25]. The latter declared the groundlessness of the accusations against the OUN:

      “It is also impossible to hang Khatyn on Bandera. This would be contrary to historical truth. Khatyn was burned by the punishers of the 118th police battalion. So, most of the police came from Ukraine, and the unit itself was formed in Kyiv. But these were not nationalists, but ordinary traitors, their atrocities have no limits. But they were born and raised in our country, and our land nurtured them”[26].
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. +3
    22 March 2023 14: 52
    Si son sumininistradas tales municiones y los ucronazis llegan a usarlas y, la respuesta rusa no es demoledora, perderá mucho más prestigio el gobierno ruso que con todas las líneas rojas que le han sobrepasado irrespetuosa y humillantemente.
  18. +2
    22 March 2023 14: 53
    As usual, they will tell you about the next red lines and that's it !!!!
  19. +1
    22 March 2023 14: 58
    Quote: oppozite28
    Alexander Lukashenko spoke about this as follows:

    As soon as the depleted uranium ammunition explodes on Russian positions, everyone will see the answer. He will be terrible. And this will be a lesson for the entire planet.
    Lukashenka will introduce a potato embargo for unfriendly countries, as well as a ban on the export of Belarusian-made seafood. request

    No: it will be something else, but the light from it will be seen in London.
  20. -2
    22 March 2023 15: 01
    President of Belarus: As soon as depleted uranium ammunition explodes on Russian positions, you will see the answer, it will be a lesson for the whole planet

    Naturally, after that, Russia can use "lead-2" with a clear conscience, and the territory of Ukraine will become toxic for any type of activity.
  21. +1
    22 March 2023 15: 02
    On February 24.02.2022, XNUMX, Putin also said a lot of things. There is a video. Well, how much sense? Zero. Nobody is afraid of him. What the Ukrainians want, they deliver it, they help as they want. And all why? Because words are not backed up by deeds, and impunity, as you know, gives rise to pervasiveness. Himself to blame. And I am more than sure that uranium shells will supply aircraft and much more
    1. 0
      22 March 2023 16: 15
      You wrote everything correctly!
      Neither subtract nor add, it's a pity that not everyone realizes this ...
  22. -1
    22 March 2023 15: 05
    test on those who supply ammunition with depleted uranium and Poseidon, let them experience infection on themselves and it will be useful for us to conduct a test
  23. +3
    22 March 2023 15: 07
    Belarus struck me (8-12 years ago) with how carefully they keep the memory of the Second World War. They remember all the heroes and remember all the assholes. Why isn't this in Russia? Who is Nemtsov, who is (not a writer) - Gaidar? What kind of scum is 'Redhead'? Yavlinsky, Khazbulatov - why isn't even 'Marked' listed as a traitor here? The always drunk one somehow dodged.
    1. 0
      22 March 2023 18: 02
      why is it that even "Labeled" is not listed as a traitor in our country?


      If you were 18 years old or older at the time of the collapse of the USSR, then for a start you write yourself down as traitors, Tagged tried to save everything that the walking dead with Brezhnev at the head did before him, it’s bad that Tagged turned out to be completely incompetent for such a position, but that's a different question.
  24. +2
    22 March 2023 15: 27
    I believe that the only way to stop the impudent Saxons! Unfortunately, otherwise they do not hear and will not hear!!
  25. +2
    22 March 2023 15: 33
    As soon as the depleted uranium ammunition explodes on Russian positions, everyone will see the answer.

    The uranium core of armor-piercing sub-caliber shells DOES NOT EXPLODE AT ALL AND NEVER. It pierces armor with the kinetic energy of the impact. Plus, when it hits steel, the oxide film breaks off and uranium enters into an exothermic reaction.
    Hence the increased incendiary effect of the projectile.
    1. 0
      22 March 2023 18: 03
      The old man is a collective farmer, and even in his years, he can be forgiven.
  26. 0
    22 March 2023 16: 32
    "They (in the West and Ukraine) will wait for Russia to supply us with shells with real uranium. Do they want it there?"
    One "Poseidon" decides everything !!!!
  27. 0
    22 March 2023 16: 42
    The Old Man apparently hinted to the Anglo-Saxons about the Poseidon, which could increase the English Channel at the expense of the territory of the "old woman"
    1. -3
      22 March 2023 18: 04
      The old man is one foot away from the fate of Gaddafi, to whom he can hint and threaten.
  28. +1
    22 March 2023 17: 04
    At first, according to the text of the article, I thought that a nuclear strike on Britain would be inflicted (so that uranium shells would NOT be used by others - towards Russia).
  29. +2
    22 March 2023 17: 14
    So it is so, but what does Lukashenka have to do with it smile
  30. 0
    22 March 2023 17: 48
    Maybe then shandarakht a couple of kilotons through the famous tunnel with a dagger with tactical nuclear weapons?! And also, to remake several decommissioned Poplars with a expired term for non-nuclear substance and, finally, hammer out these main bridges in western Ukraine!
    This is precisely the action that will make it difficult to further deliver weapons and ammunition to the Armed Forces of Ukraine and will show NATO the seriousness of our words and intentions.

    And we need to continue to disable the machine rooms of the thermal power plant and large transformer substations from 100 kV to 1150 kV! It is the disabling of the energy infrastructure that will give additional motivation and enable all people living in western Ukraine, from among those who disagree with the political course of the Zelensky office and with the continuation of the military confrontation, to justifiably take to the streets for mass protests and organize themselves against representatives of the Nazi regime. Surely there will immediately be adequate political leaders who are ready to pick up and lead the spontaneous popular initiative and direct these forces to resolve the domestic political crisis imposed from outside by NATO countries.
    We have already seen in the example of Odessa how a blackout for several days brought thousands of people to the streets. Especially now, when representatives of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine have begun to be massively sent to the front line, and many of them will think about whether it is necessary to prevent the people from restoring order in their own country and hinder the end of the conflict by peaceful means.

    If someone is afraid about the further civilian life of civilians in Ukraine, then all these power plants, substations and bridges can be restored after the end of the NWO in a matter of months (especially if also with Russian help), we see even on the example of the Crimean bridge, that it is solvable. There is no problem with electricity either - Russia can allocate free capacities for the period of repair - for example, deliveries go to the Chinese at a big discount.
    1. +1
      23 March 2023 11: 43
      This should have been done at least a year ago!
      But alas and ah - our Ministry of Defense arranged the crap.
      Communications of Ukraine continue to function without hindrance.
      All sorts of personalities constantly come to Kyiv - otherwise our Ministry of Defense DOES NOT DO anything to prevent this. TOKA fortified areas in the frontal storm and FSE !!!!
      Current frontal strikes .. well, a bit of rockets sometimes shoot somewhere .. moreover, I can’t understand - they’ve already shot a drain of missiles. WHERE IS THE EFFECT ???
  31. +1
    22 March 2023 17: 52
    What virtuoso words are our counterparts the Saxons with the Angles. Even here in the comments (maybe I didn’t read it well), everyone “forgot” the very fact of the intention to transfer the tanks, as it became on the side. Well, they "agree" to transfer tanks without uranium shells. And what? Will we say thank you?
  32. +1
    22 March 2023 19: 23
    For the 120 mm L30 cannon of the Challenger 2 tank, there are four main armor-piercing projectiles adopted for service, namely:
    - L26A1 (1991), uranium core, pierces 510 mm at 2 km;
    - L27A1 (1999), uranium core, pierces 610 mm at 2 km;
    - L28A1 (2001), tungsten core, pierces 630 mm at 2 km;
    - L28A2 (2009), tungsten core, pierces 650 mm at 2 km.
    In a word, tungsten shells for the L30 are newer and better than uranium ones. It turns out that the British were going to supply the Armed Forces with outdated shells of the 1990s, albeit with uranium cores, the only advantage of which over tungsten is pyrophoricity.
    1. 0
      22 March 2023 20: 14
      First of all, the advantage of tungsten crowbars is safety for the crew and for the ecology of the battlefield!
      (Not the fact that the armor penetration of uranium is worse).
      1. +2
        23 March 2023 07: 31
        Uranium penetration is better, but in this case (for L30) tungsten shells are newer and have an improved design, due to which their armor penetration is higher.
      2. 0
        24 March 2023 06: 39
        First of all, the advantage of tungsten crowbars is safety for the crew and for the ecology of the battlefield!
        (Not the fact that the armor penetration of uranium is worse).

        Yes, the main advantage of uranium shells is their lower cost, since they are made from waste. The Anglo-Saxons give their waste to the outskirts and at the same time infect Eastern Europe with all sorts of filth. You can argue about the degree of danger of depleted uranium for a long time (I don’t want to enter into an argument myself, although I have extensive experience working with IRS), it is obvious that the degree of danger is incomparable with a nuclear explosion of even tactical ammunition, but it is clearly not useful for the health of people living in this area . With a large number of shells, an ecological garbage dump is formed, and this is the second task (besides the use for its intended purpose on our tanks), which will be solved by an Englishwoman who is used to spoiling! And that is why ours will not use uranium cores against non-brothers (we have similar shells in warehouses), because this is OUR LAND! And the effect of shells on the health of crews using such shells is a moot point.
  33. +2
    23 March 2023 06: 41
    As soon as the depleted uranium ammunition explodes on Russian positions,

    He is, of course, strong!
    If you wait for an explosion of uranium scrap for our answer, they can not be afraid of this answer ...
    But the ignition of armor-piercing scrap from being hit and the inhalation of particles of uranium oxide from smoke is a very bad thing ...
  34. 0
    23 March 2023 10: 51
    "As soon as the depleted uranium ammunition explodes on Russian positions, everyone will see the answer. It will be terrible. And this will be a lesson for the whole planet ..." (c)
    Well, here, another "redline" and "extreme step" has drawn ...
  35. 0
    23 March 2023 11: 50
    Quote: yaglon
    whose only advantage over tungsten is that they are pyrophoric.

    I'll correct you a little.
    Tungsten is also pyrophoric!!!!!
    But!!! To do this, the tungsten core must have a speed of about 15% more than that of the uranium. That is, for uranium, for example, 1500 m / s is enough, but tungsten requires 1700-1800 m / s.
    That is the difference.
  36. 0
    23 March 2023 18: 59
    Exploding depleted uranium ammunition is strong!
  37. +1
    24 March 2023 02: 23
    I respect Lukashenka, and the author of the article is sent to the KGB of the Republic of Belarus.
    you can't do that. If the president said something stupid (depleted uranium shells will explode), then there is no need to replicate it.
    "A well-mannered person is not the one who does not spill the sauce on the tablecloth, but the one who saw it and did not make a tragedy out of it.
    And so: "out of mind diligence."
    As they say: "It's better to be quiet sometimes - you'll show yourself smarter!"
    1. 0
      April 4 2023 20: 16
      Well, I remember the decree of Peter 1 about speaking in unwritten language ...
      But the point is not in the reservation - shells will explode, or propellant charges in shells - in this case this is secondary!
      Quote: Alexander Tkachenko
      And so: "out of mind diligence."
      So what, you propose to hush up this topic ?? Do you think that agricultural products from these fields, which they want to poison with hundreds of uranium shells for many years, at least decades, will not get on the table for you or your family ??
  38. Jyt
    0
    24 March 2023 11: 05
    Another Tweedledee from United Russia, and there will be nothing bourgeois, the bourgeois eye will not gouge out, but on people .......!
  39. 0
    24 March 2023 11: 08
    Enough talk about the doses and dangers of radiation. This is what everyone knows. And we need to sink the British frigate, which will approach the Crimea! Because of this, they will not unleash a thermonuclear war. And we say OH!!! it accidentally happened! But the shaves will wash themselves and stop being impudent. Remember the recent drone incident!!!
    1. 0
      April 4 2023 20: 23
      Let's say that it is not necessary to attack in such cases, if it does not climb into our territorial waters. But, it's dangerous there, he can run into a Ukrainian mine - there were so many of them scattered then!
  40. 0
    24 March 2023 11: 53
    Uranium scrap does not explode - it is purely kinetic ammunition!
    1. 0
      April 4 2023 20: 27
      From a collision at high speed, even asteroids explode, not like uranium crowbars are dirty kinetic ammunition.