American strategic bomber B-52H Stratofortress worked out the possibility of launching a missile attack on St. Petersburg

119
American strategic bomber B-52H Stratofortress worked out the possibility of launching a missile attack on St. Petersburg

The United States continues the practice of provocations near the Russian borders, this time the Americans have worked out the possibility of launching a missile attack on St. Petersburg using the B-52H Stratofortress strategic bomber. Data on the flight route of the American strategist was provided by the Flightradar service.

The US Air Force B-52H strategic bomber worked out an attack on the Russian northern capital, entering the city from the Baltic Sea near Gogland Island, while being in neutral airspace. According to the service, the American bomber took off from the territory of Poland, after which it flew over the Baltic Sea towards the Russian city, simulated a missile attack over the Gulf of Finland, after which it turned around and went to the base through the Baltic airspace. During the "attack" the American strategist was at a distance of 200 km from St. Petersburg.



According to experts, with the help of the B-52H Stratofortress, the United States worked out a scenario for breaking through the anti-missile and air defense of the North-Western group of the Russian army with nuclear missile strikes on military and industrial facilities in the area.


It is worth noting that this is not the first incident of this kind near the Russian borders in general, and near St. Petersburg in particular. American B-52H strategists have already simulated an attack on the city, since they have plenty of opportunities for this, given that the Baltic states are happy to provide the Americans with their airspace. Attacks of this kind were practiced on Kaliningrad, as well as on the Crimea. In the Far East, the Americans continue to periodically harass the air defense of Kamchatka, trying to open the air defense scheme.

The last "attack" by American strategists took place at the end of February of this year, when two bombers attacked St. Petersburg from Estonia.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    119 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +9
      12 March 2023 07: 05
      simulated a missile attack over the Gulf of Finland,
      Our air defense obviously accompanied the B-52H and at the right time (before the imitation of the strike by the Americans) also simulated the destruction of the target. So far, mutual training, but with the increasing impudence of the Americans, it is not known how at one "perfect" moment all this can end.
      1. -8
        12 March 2023 07: 11
        Quote: rotmistr60
        also simulated the destruction of the target

        Well, if so, but they could have dropped it! am
        1. +12
          12 March 2023 07: 28
          Training for both sides. However, we also work out similar blows
          1. +20
            12 March 2023 08: 32
            I hope that the Balts will finish their game soon.

            It is necessary to eliminate the Baltic limitrophes, this is the enemy's foothold!
            1. +21
              12 March 2023 08: 48
              Quote: Ilya-spb
              I hope that the Balts will finish their game soon.

              It is necessary to eliminate the Baltic limitrophes, this is the enemy's foothold!

              First, we thoughtlessly give away our lands to enemies .... All these Lithuanias, Latvias and Estonias, and then we are surprised at the results of our stupidities ... It would be nice, as the United States did. They themselves seemed to have left, but the military bases remained forever .. What prevented us from having military bases in the Tribaltic? On all these wonderful islands of Gotland, etc.. What prevented you from having military bases throughout Ukraine and Moldova? Stupidity and betrayal of the party elites of the USSR. That's what . And then the pro-American elites of Russia in the 90s ... That's what. We do everything ourselves, with our own hands ... .. And now God forbid we mess up our own !! Again our elites, again all by ourselves...
              1. -5
                12 March 2023 12: 29
                According to experts, the B-52H Stratofortress has worked out the scenario for breaking through the air defense of the SZVO

                It’s a pity that I didn’t enter the 200-mile zone, probably the pilots got tired of the tension and turned away sharply. Interestingly, ours sent an oncoming lane to intercept?
                1. -1
                  13 March 2023 04: 23
                  Well, the local "generals" and "marshals" don't like me... c'est la vie.)
                  I read your comments ... is it really that bad?
              2. +1
                12 March 2023 13: 28
                yuri, do not confuse the swedish island of gotland and the russian gogland
                1. +1
                  12 March 2023 15: 52
                  Quote: Ryaruav
                  yuri, do not confuse the swedish island of gotland and the russian gogland

                  I don't confuse. Just a generalization. I hope there will be no international scandal from my words. hi
              3. -3
                12 March 2023 13: 49
                Quote: 30 vis
                Stupidity and betrayal of the party elites of the USSR. That's what . And then the pro-American elites of Russia in the 90s ... That's what.

                Do not post nonsense - at that time, the party elites no longer played any role in politics. They were not up to it.
              4. +1
                12 March 2023 22: 11
                Capitalism. The CPSU degenerated from a people's party into a partocracy of careerists, correct Marxists squeezed out of it over time, because with the advent of Khrushchev this coup towards opportunism and betrayal occurred, and was outlined under Stalin, and the prerequisites for the degeneration of the party were formed due to the circumstances in which the axis was located. young Soviet state. It was impossible to defeat the democracy of the Soviets during the intervention, in the arming of the imperialist countries, too, therefore there was a party dictatorship, here was the reverse side of the medal, they defeated everyone, but they failed to return back to Soviet democracy, alas, the collapse of the USSR was historically inevitable, will the inevitable defeat of the Russian Federation be from here? The answer to this question was clear even 10 years ago, or even more. Now everything depends on China.
                1. 0
                  12 March 2023 23: 28
                  In general, "+".
                  However, if
                  Quote: Alexander Petrovich
                  alas, historically the collapse of the USSR was inevitable, will the inevitable defeat of the Russian Federation be from here? The answer to this question was clear even 10 years ago, or even more.

                  then could you decipher what exactly was clear for a long time? hi
                  1. 0
                    13 March 2023 15: 27
                    It has long been clear that we will win, but what did you think?
              5. 0
                13 March 2023 01: 15
                I do not remember that someone asked me whether to give or not.
              6. 0
                13 March 2023 11: 01
                If the whole government of the country is built like this, then what do you want good?
            2. -14
              12 March 2023 08: 51
              The fact that the B-52 was in Poland means that it was already under the guns of Daggers, Iskanders, and Calibers.
              1. +11
                12 March 2023 10: 01
                HOW can an aircraft in the air be targeted by all of the above ????
              2. +5
                12 March 2023 10: 20
                Quote: figvam
                The fact that the B-52 was in Poland means that it was already under the guns of Daggers, Iskanders, and Calibers.

                If this is not sarcasm, then I sympathize with you ...
                hi
              3. +12
                12 March 2023 10: 39
                And who covers St. Petersburg? Capital of the Russian Empire?
                6 Air Force and Air Defense Army.
                Three fighter aviation regiments (this is in the whole army!) One regiment 1000 km from the city, two 300 km from the city. Did you go up to intercept this strategist from Petrozavodsk or from Khotilovo? Count 500 km there, 500 back.
                Or maybe the Baltic Fleet from Kaliningrad has nothing else to do there, how to fly under St. Petersburg?
                Gromovo with MiG-31 - no. Lodeynogo Pole with Sushki - no. Pre-reformed. Because there are only partners around.
                I won’t speak for the rocket men, they will say it themselves if they consider it necessary.
                1. +7
                  12 March 2023 13: 24
                  Oh, I just served in Gromovo, obs rto, and the 31sts were standing, and the 27ths flew in, it was a long time ago ... and then they "optimized", apparently to please the "partners" ...
            3. +5
              12 March 2023 10: 31
              They are in NATO now you can’t liquidate anything.
            4. 0
              12 March 2023 20: 21
              Quote: Ilya-spb
              I hope that the Balts will finish their game soon.

              It is necessary to eliminate the Baltic limitrophes, this is the enemy's foothold!
              Why these formidable, strainedly pathetic and loud statements/calls? Maybe in their senselessness and provocativeness?! winked
          2. +4
            12 March 2023 11: 28
            Our strategists also need to work out a mock attack on Washington or New York.
            1. +2
              12 March 2023 14: 17
              Yes, but :
              - Dans le sens USA contre Russie tout le monde et les médias diront : Entraînement
              - Dans le sens Russie contre USA tout le monde criera : Provocation
              Toujours le deux poids deux mesures de la "démocratie"

              Yes, but:
              - In the sense of the USA against Russia, everyone and the media will say: training
              - In the sense of Russia against the United States, everyone will shout: a provocation
              always double standards of "democracy"
          3. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. 0
          13 March 2023 12: 22
          ... hard in training - easy in battle ... our air defense has a chance to train on a real target ...
      2. +9
        12 March 2023 07: 38
        Quote: rotmistr60
        Our air defense obviously accompanied the B-52H and at the right time (before the imitation of the strike by the Americans) also simulated the destruction of the target.

        Our air defense accompanied Rust and also, probably, simulated the destruction of the target. The result is known.
        1. -2
          12 March 2023 07: 59
          Our air defense accompanied Rust ... The result is known

          did you have to hit it? I agree, but we hoped for peaceful coexistence ...
          1. +14
            12 March 2023 08: 17
            Quote from ivan_nkl
            did you have to hit it?

            Definitely.
            Quote from ivan_nkl
            hoping for peaceful coexistence...

            Nonsense all this. It got to the point that in the newspapers of the early 90s they wrote that we do not need an army, it is enough to leave the border troops and the Strategic Missile Forces. Peace, friendship, chewing gum!

            1. -2
              12 March 2023 10: 36
              Definitely.


              Have you seen the ICAO guiding documents, under which the USSR also signed on the rules for the interception of civil aircraft?
        2. +3
          12 March 2023 08: 33
          There it was something else. No one could make a decision and give the command to bring down
          1. +8
            12 March 2023 08: 37
            Quote from Kreta25
            No one could make a decision and give the command to bring down

            Do you think that today the decision to shoot down everyone will happily run to order?
            1. +5
              12 March 2023 09: 35
              But in the USA they won’t even think, they can easily order this.
              1. +4
                12 March 2023 10: 02
                Ha-ha, and the ball flew free!!
            2. -2
              12 March 2023 10: 08
              Do you think that today the decision to shoot down everyone will happily run to order?

              they didn’t give an order immediately at the border, because the plane was clearly not a military one and could have flown in by mistake, plus there were passenger boards nearby and they were afraid to catch it, before that a civilian Korean Boeing had already been shot down

              then he already disappeared from the radar because he was going to ultra-small

              they spotted him again near Moscow, but they didn’t shoot him down due to negligence, the flight director gave him a mark “his”
          2. +2
            12 March 2023 10: 47
            There it was something else. No one could make a decision and give the command to bring down


            For starters, read the guidelines:
            https://standart.aero/ru/icao/book/%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82-9433-%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE-%D0%BF%D0%BE-%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83-%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%85-%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8B%D1%85-%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B2-%D1%80%D1%83-%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81
            If you're lazy, here are the excerpts.
        3. -2
          12 March 2023 09: 56
          Our air defense accompanied Rust and also, probably, simulated the destruction of the target. The result is known.


          That's what a habit some people have, absolutely not knowing the topic, to give out "authoritative" statements.
          1. -1
            12 March 2023 11: 13
            Did the shoulder straps of the authorities, after the story with Rust, also fly because of peacefulness?
            1. 0
              12 March 2023 11: 52
              Flew under a far-fetched pretext. The hunchback needed to behead the army.
              1. -2
                12 March 2023 15: 06
                In short, here is an almost minute-by-minute analysis of his entire flight with a clarification of who gave what orders or did not give them:
                https://www.gazeta.ru/army/2017/05/28/10696505.shtml?updated
                The MIGs raised to intercept have cannon weapons, it was not necessary to shoot them down directly, you could at least shoot nearby so that it would come to him that it was not necessary to do this and it was time to sit down.
                PS It is simply necessary to stop this, nothing prevented him, for example, from stuffing the fuselage with explosives and staging a terrorist attack.
                1. +2
                  12 March 2023 16: 31
                  In short, here is an almost minute-by-minute analysis of his entire flight

                  fig analysis, there is not much there, for example, not a word about it
                  Rust was in the Pskov region when at 15:00, in accordance with the schedule, the code number of the “friend or foe” system was changed. There were training flights of one of the aviation regiments, and an inexperienced young lieutenant of the duty shift of the air defense command post assigned the sign "his own" to all objects in the air.



                  The MIGs raised to intercept have cannon weapons, it was not necessary to shoot them down directly, you could at least shoot nearby

                  this was impossible due to the difference in speed, they flew over the Cessna very quickly and could not accompany, it was said about why the MIGs did not force him to land
                  1. 0
                    12 March 2023 16: 46
                    this was impossible due to the difference in speed, they flew over the Cessna very quickly, it was said about this why the MIGs did not force him to land

                    Is it just impossible to issue a line behind him near his side at the minimum thrust? How interesting it is for planes to take off and land, probably immediately at a speed of at least Mach 1.)))
                    During the investigation, Rust was asked if he had seen a fighter jet. The German confirmed and said that he even greeted the Soviet pilot, but did not receive any response signals. The radio station of the Cessna 172R aircraft was turned off.


                    Residents of Vladivostok witnessed a unique spectacle - a fourth-generation fighter SU-35S flying at minimum speed over Ajax Bay. The ultra-low speed of the aircraft, about 200 kilometers per hour, made it possible to make a breathtaking video.


                    https://rg.ru/2018/09/10/reg-dfo/polet-su-35-na-minimalnoj-skorosti-sniali-na-video.html
                2. -3
                  12 March 2023 17: 34
                  In short, here is an almost minute-by-minute analysis of his entire flight with a clarification of who gave what orders or did not give them:
                  https://www.gazeta.ru/army/2017/05/28/10696505.shtml?updated
                  The MIGs raised to intercept have cannon weapons, it was not necessary to shoot them down directly, you could at least shoot nearby so that it would come to him that it was not necessary to do this and it was time to sit down.
                  PS It is simply necessary to stop this, nothing prevented him, for example, from stuffing the fuselage with explosives and staging a terrorist attack.


                  Links to the "newspaper ru", like the newspaper itself, are only suitable for a village toilet, and then if there was no toilet paper at hand.
                  I have already given a link to a document that was mandatory for the air defense of the USSR.
                  I also attached a screenshot with excerpts. But not everyone's vision is good.
                  I'll attach it again, read until you reach it.

                  I spent half of my service life in the Czech Republic on combat duty against these very low-flying, low-speed targets.
                  Do you think at least once lifted into the air to intercept? Fig. And the point is not at all that there were no violations on the part of Austria. It was enough, there was no satellite navigation then, the people were lost in the sky.
                  But they didn’t raise it just for the above reasons, away from sin.
                  And yes, I was replaced in Czechoslovakia in October 1988.
          2. +1
            12 March 2023 15: 01
            Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
            That's what a habit some people have, absolutely not knowing the topic, to give out "authoritative" statements.

            I do not have an "authoritative", but an absolutely civil opinion. According to your papers, it turns out that we illegally shot down the Korean Boeing?
            1. +3
              12 March 2023 16: 38
              According to Marshal of the Soviet Union D.T. Yazov, the air defense troops drove the Cessna to Moscow and did not stop the flight, because after the story with the downed South Korean airliner, they received an order not to shoot down civilian aircraft[15]. In addition, in accordance with the Chicago Convention, to which the USSR was a party, in case of violation of airspace by light-engine sports aircraft, they could only be forced to land, which is much more difficult than destroying [14]:

              The Contracting States recognize that each State must refrain from resorting to the use of weapons against civil aircraft in flight and that, in the event of interception, the lives of persons on board and the safety of the aircraft must not be endangered.
              — Article 3 bis, paragraph "a" of the Chicago Convention, added unanimously at the 25th session of the ICAO Assembly on May 10, 1984[16].
            2. +2
              12 March 2023 20: 46
              I do not have an "authoritative", but an absolutely civil opinion. According to your papers, it turns out that we illegally shot down the Korean Boeing?


              Just after this incident, these ICAO amendments were adopted. Like there won't be any more incidents like this in the future.
              And what really was shot down there is a mystery shrouded in darkness. And just there ours slipped. Snot chewed for too long. It was necessary to bring down on Kamchatka, or over Sakhalin.
              1. 0
                13 March 2023 12: 38
                And as an addition, there is an opinion that the Boeing crew made a mistake with setting the course, because there was a violation of the border.
                Even so, in addition, the crew picked their noses, did not keep dead reckoning, did not specify their place.
                But the flight took place at night and over the sea, that is, in absolute darkness.
                And what, nothing worked in their heads when, unexpectedly, on the half of the route (flight time) there was a large light landmark Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky on the course?
                And yes, the version of the clouds is swept aside, because in such cases there is a large light spot on them.
        4. The comment was deleted.
      3. old
        -2
        12 March 2023 09: 29
        The pilots had no doubt that they were suicide bombers: if we can miss something from missiles, then it’s hard to miss such a target. Yes, and they will have nowhere to return ..
        And they also screamed in the cockpit notably
      4. +5
        12 March 2023 10: 14
        Right. Here in the 92nd, a Pole on a MIG-21 began to imitate an attack on our ship from various heights and headings. So we brought all the shooting stations to a high altitude and took a greyhound to accompany us. Immediately turned away and rushed off, the former "ally".
      5. +6
        12 March 2023 10: 34
        Our air defense obviously accompanied the B-52H and at the right time (before the imitation of the strike by the Americans) also simulated the destruction of the target.

        This is just a defensive option. In response, it is necessary to simulate a missile attack on New York using the Tu-160. All the conditions are there: the flight range of the Tu-160 allows, New York is on the Atlantic coast and the entry from the sea is similar to that of St. Petersburg.
        ps. Moreover, a good visual landmark is the Statue of Liberty. It will be difficult to smudge.
      6. -1
        12 March 2023 11: 58
        Quote: rotmistr60
        Our air defense obviously accompanied the B-52H and at the right time (before the imitation of the strike by the Americans) also simulated the destruction of the target.

        It would be nice if our air defense would begin to use dummies to simulate interception - exact copies of intercepting missiles, in which in the warhead, instead of an explosive, non-washable paint, which is used in store alarms.
        And having received a piece of iron on board, which, upon contact, smears a bucket of paint on the fuselage, convinces much more than just voice information that you were intercepted.
        Yes, and returning to the airfield in this form is a shame.
      7. +3
        13 March 2023 15: 03
        He worked out the opportunity and realized that there was no opportunity
    2. +14
      12 March 2023 07: 06
      "Nice plane!

      - Did you like? Why good?
      - They will definitely give a Hero for such a one!" (C)
      1. +8
        12 March 2023 07: 13
        Like the biggest mark on the radar. It's impossible to miss.
        But, this pipe carries a lot of unpleasant surprises for the fight against our radars.
        The multi-layered, multi-tiered and unity of our air defense greatly saves.
        Officers, don't be afraid to take responsibility for making decisions. A mistake will cost more.
        1. +7
          12 March 2023 07: 26
          Neutral waters, he conducted fish exploration there, the Scandinavians asked to look for sprat .. Yes
          1. +2
            12 March 2023 10: 03
            Piping check whether it is necessary to add
            1. 0
              12 March 2023 12: 31
              Quote: novel xnumx
              Pipelines check

              Maybe some other thread of the yacht is carrying explosives!
              Roma hi
        2. +9
          12 March 2023 07: 58
          Read, listen to Konstantin Sivkov, in the country there is neither multi-layered, nor multi-tiered, nor the unity of our air defense. There is only object air defense
          St. Petersburg is the president's hometown, and in the event of war he will get it in full, like Leningrad, like Stalingrad in WWII.
          1. +2
            12 March 2023 11: 24
            Quote: V.
            St. Petersburg is the president's hometown, and in the event of war he will get it in full, like Leningrad, like Stalingrad in WWII.

            Peter is already on the list of striped priority targets without it. For a long time.
    3. 0
      12 March 2023 07: 15
      My wife's sister lives there, a very good girl. Well, now what to do?
      1. +1
        12 March 2023 08: 01
        Well, now what to do?

        debt by payment is beautiful...
      2. +7
        12 March 2023 08: 35
        take the MANPADS and run to protect her.)
        Sorry, I'm not smart enough to write a normal comment
    4. +4
      12 March 2023 07: 24
      When can we expect our answer by flying a pair of Tu-160s with an imitation of an attack from some Cuban or Venezuelan base against Fashington? Maybe put on duty there? Or the Poseidons are already lying in readiness at the bottom of the sea !!!
      Although yesterday I also expected more from Peter Yan, so he clearly poked with his palm. I thought the Georgians would not even come out after that ... lol
    5. +12
      12 March 2023 07: 25
      Has the Foreign Ministry already expressed concern? Masha already joked flatly in the cart?
      1. +4
        12 March 2023 07: 51
        Our Masha will still dance, but the main LADY is still silent.
      2. -8
        12 March 2023 09: 23
        An animal has fallen from here. And I say this very softly.
        1. +4
          12 March 2023 11: 13
          Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
          An animal has fallen from here. And I say this very softly.


          Did you dream of CIPSO again? Poor guy...
          1. 0
            13 March 2023 22: 25
            No, I saw an animal ........
    6. +17
      12 March 2023 07: 35
      Why don't our strategists imitate strikes against Poland from neutral territory...
      Until they violate, let them rush about. If they break it, you don't have to think long. Shoot down, like just now in the USSR with a Boeing ...
      After all sorts of provocations with blowing up skyscrapers and other lunar scams, there is no guarantee that this "passenger" Boeing was not loaded with unclaimed corpses from the morgue...
      * * *
      The best and most accessible option is to distribute a video (whether artistic or animated) with the results of Russian missile attacks on the territories where this mold grows (to improve the education of the European population living there).
      1. +3
        12 March 2023 07: 56
        You’re right, comrade, propaganda is needed - and videos where rbm burn European cities, especially those where American tactical weapons are based
    7. +6
      12 March 2023 07: 39
      Why did the Americans decide on such a threatening action?
      I think the answer lies in the destruction of American advisers by the recent strike of the Daggers ... apparently it was a shame for them, so they decided to wave a nuclear baton under our noses.
      I think the Russian Aerospace Forces should repeat this lesson for the Americans again ... they did not learn it.
      1. 0
        12 March 2023 07: 48
        It was necessary to shoot down this guano. Fuck yourself. They could have hit, right? How do we know what they think there?
        1. +3
          12 March 2023 08: 38
          Do you know how to read? He was over neutral territory. Are you suggesting a nuclear apocalypse?
          1. +1
            12 March 2023 11: 32
            Quote: Normann
            Do you know how to read? He was over neutral territory. Are you suggesting a nuclear apocalypse?

            There is only one conclusion: the border of neutral territory must be pushed back.
            1. -1
              12 March 2023 15: 44
              Immediately after bakhmut
              Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke
              the border of neutral territory must be moved back
    8. +7
      12 March 2023 07: 40
      it is necessary to launch a couple of dozen weather balloons towards America
      1. +4
        12 March 2023 08: 04
        a couple dozen weather balloons

        with mysterious corner reflectors
      2. -1
        12 March 2023 09: 20
        it is necessary to launch a couple of dozen weather balloons towards America

        with mysterious corner reflectors

        .... and nuclear stuffing .... wassat joke...
    9. +16
      12 March 2023 07: 40
      The Baltic States have always been a complete Russophobe, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia during the Second World War not only were a springboard for an attack on the USSR, but also themselves stood in the orderly ranks of the Wehrmacht and the SS. Stalin's big mistake was that after the war, the population of these countries was not denazified, they were simply accepted into the union along with the embittered anti-Soviet population, which, as soon as the central government weakened in Moscow, immediately rose and proclaimed independence.
      1. +5
        12 March 2023 07: 45
        Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
        Stalin's big mistake was that after the war, the population of these countries was not denazified, they were simply accepted into the union along with the embittered anti-Soviet population,

        I agree ... the lustration of the relatives of the forest brothers and former policemen had to be carried out in full.
        We then limited ourselves to half-measures.
    10. +1
      12 March 2023 07: 50
      The Americans practiced a missile attack on St. Petersburg using the B-52H Stratofortress strategic bomber.

      And why don't our TU-160s work out a PREVENTIVE nuclear strike against nuclear weapons carriers in the US and the EU?

      I just can't understand this ingeniously suicidal strategy of "starting nothing".
    11. 0
      12 March 2023 08: 04
      It was they who, out of anger, flew in for the destruction of their headquarters in Kyiv. There seem to be hundreds of corpses, if not thousands, along with the Armed Forces of Ukraine. soldier
    12. -2
      12 March 2023 08: 12
      The Russian boat also simulated a nuclear strike, only at the moment of takeoff of this bomber!
    13. +6
      12 March 2023 08: 14
      I'm a little out: the American plane flies over the Baltic with the transponder on, and our pair of 160s when approaching Engels ... I see visually, there are no on the flyradar
      1. 0
        13 March 2023 05: 37
        And what's so surprising - they need informational noise, to raise a wave, to scare the type, but we just work and we don't need it ...
    14. +3
      12 March 2023 08: 22
      Quote: rotmistr60
      simulated a missile attack over the Gulf of Finland,
      Our air defense obviously accompanied the B-52H and at the right time (before the imitation of the strike by the Americans) also simulated the destruction of the target. So far, mutual training, but with the increasing impudence of the Americans, it is not known how at one "perfect" moment all this can end.

      It doesn't say if it had nukes on board, just cruise missiles, or if it was just getting into position to strike. What will end? Well, we have been playing such games with them for several decades and nothing. Now let's send a couple of Bears to them or work out a strike on Sweden... And if someone loses their nerves during the game, then the human virus that has captured planet Earth will be sterilized.
    15. 0
      12 March 2023 08: 34
      Without the destruction of the air defense group in Kaliningrad, such a route is deadly for the B-52
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. 0
          12 March 2023 17: 29
          Quote: Custody
          Is this the air defense that does not notice the swifts on approach to Engels?

          And TA, on whose account there are already more than one hundred downed aircraft
      2. +1
        12 March 2023 11: 25
        A couple of days before that, the same B-52 had already practiced a strike on Kaliningrad while over Denmark, with a further route over the Baltic to the Estonian Territories. water.
    16. The comment was deleted.
    17. 0
      12 March 2023 08: 42
      Well, work out the otaku on Fashington
    18. +1
      12 March 2023 08: 42
      At the first stage of the air offensive operation, the B52 will not even approach the border for a thousand kilometers, they take it to the show.
    19. +3
      12 March 2023 08: 44
      I don’t understand the panic and demands for an answer - our “bears” also fly over neutral waters and around Japan and look at the British and where else, and continental Europe is shot through from land. Ordinary situation...
      1. -1
        12 March 2023 17: 53
        Quote: faiver
        I don’t understand the panic and demands for an answer - our “bears” also fly over neutral waters and around Japan and look at the British and where else, and continental Europe is shot through from land. Ordinary situation...

        That's when our "Bears" or "White Swans" fly hundreds of kilometers from New York, then it will really be a "normal situation"
    20. +3
      12 March 2023 08: 46
      Such activity of the US Air Force suggests that the US strategy is mired in the Ukrainian theme. The "clear" sequence in actions and the "accuracy" of each subsequent step, the "solidity" of European society in its solidarity with the citizens of Ukraine, as well as the opening of Biden's skull were predictable.
    21. +2
      12 March 2023 08: 58
      Notice they're planning the attack, not us.
    22. -1
      12 March 2023 09: 14
      It's time to work properly on the Pentagon and Washington. Well, it's time to shoot down these flyers as a potential threat to Russian cities.
      1. 0
        12 March 2023 10: 19
        Poseidons on the bottom, New York area got a little tight
    23. +9
      12 March 2023 09: 14
      In Soviet times, there was a clear confidence that all borders were locked. And land, and sea, and air. He himself served in the air defense, the Moscow District. I remember very well how we rushed to the objects when we announced the alarm. SR-71 in the air - we are rushing. Holidays - we are rushing. Weekend - we rush. Worked out in full. And this is even when you yourself are not on combat duty. And at least 2-3 times a month. With their eyes closed, they could deploy equipment and complete tasks. We had confidence that we could do it.
      But now there is no such certainty.
      1. -3
        12 March 2023 14: 05
        Do you still serve? How many times a month does it work?
        Or is the command reporting to you? What made you decide that this is not the case?
    24. +6
      12 March 2023 09: 26
      have to answer. Somehow organize a flight and training launch of nuclear missiles from two Tu-160s 200 km from the Pentagon or New York ..... after all, these ghouls encroached on the second city of Russia .. and we need not Alaska ... but choose from two most either New York or Washington.
    25. +2
      12 March 2023 09: 26
      American strategic bomber B-52H worked out a missile attack on St. Petersburg

      I hope we are also practicing missile strikes from strategists against Fashington and the Englishwoman ..
    26. +1
      12 March 2023 09: 40
      And what, just calmly and flew? I do not believe hi
      1. B44
        +2
        12 March 2023 10: 14
        He not only took off and reached it, but also had an escort of two F-16s from Poland. Our defense was so surprised that they did not even send fighters to intercept. Sad spectacle.
      2. +1
        12 March 2023 13: 48
        Neutral waters! Every day I observe through flight radar how a US drone is circling in the middle of the Black Sea
    27. -1
      12 March 2023 09: 50
      Quote from DefenderofTruth
      why our TU-160s do not work out a PREVENTIVE nuclear strike

      A preemptive strike is not a drill, a drill, or an imitation.
      This is a full blown attack.
      Do you offer a XNUMX% start of the third world?
      What is happening now, despite the hysteria in the media, is just a local conflict, with one or another participation of different countries.
      A world war is a simultaneous direct combat clashes of the armed forces of all branches of the armed forces of many (or all) countries.
      Do not confuse these points.
    28. 0
      12 March 2023 11: 05
      so not the Russian Federation will do so others))))
    29. 0
      12 March 2023 11: 39
      Surprised why our VKS do not respond adequately? From the territory of Cuba, the TU-160 would circle off the coast of Florida. They also worked out missile strikes on mattress pads. It was very interesting to see the reaction of the White House.
      1. KCA
        0
        12 March 2023 13: 42
        The officially announced flight range of the X-102 is more than 5000 km, why drive the TU-160 to Cuba?
      2. +1
        12 March 2023 20: 34
        Quote: PVV66
        Surprised why our VKS do not respond adequately? From the territory of Cuba, the TU-160 would circle off the coast of Florida. They also worked out missile strikes on mattress pads. It was very interesting to see the reaction of the White House.
        Yes, I wonder, only you asked the Cubans for consent? winked
    30. +3
      12 March 2023 12: 57
      An amazing gathering of amateurs, this very topwar.
      The media threw in a clickbait, and now the beer army is already rushing to combat posts on stale sofas. Hit nuclear weapons, shoot down over neutral waters, launch a Tu-160 into the Statue of Liberty to ram ...
      Phenomenal. And yet, nothing new. good
    31. +3
      12 March 2023 13: 35
      The United States with the help of the B-52H Stratofortress worked out a scenario for breaking through missile and air defense


      What else "breakthrough"? A single aircraft with a huge EPR, at subsonic speed, at high altitude?

      Data on the flight route of the American strategist was provided by the Flightradar service.


      It turns out that they also have a civilian ADS-B transponder, which means it was constantly on, since Flightradar has all the data on the route? It's actually something amazing.
      1. -1
        12 March 2023 14: 09
        This is to ensure that nothing comes into it. We wanted to show that this is teaching. If it was disabled, then it was possible to shoot down ...
        1. +2
          12 March 2023 17: 08
          If it was disabled, then it was possible to shoot down ...


          Military aircraft are not required to include transponders.
          Our military pilots constantly fly over international waters without transponders - and in your opinion, any state can shoot them down ?!

          https://vz.ru/society/2016/3/29/802114.html
          Russian pilots are forced to fly without transponders

          Honored Test Pilot, Hero of Russia Alexander Garnaev: “The installation of transponders is not provided for on Russian military aircraft. This is done only selectively as an option, and only then the crew is separately instructed how to use it. Indeed, if you look into the "Manual for Flight Operations" (NPP) and "Manual for Navigational Service" (NShS) - the fundamental documents of Russian military aviation, then the word "transponder" does not occur there at all ....
    32. The comment was deleted.
    33. -1
      12 March 2023 16: 20
      Flight map is incorrect
      According to the report, the plane called NOBLE61 took off from Poland, flew over the Baltic countries, deployed near the island of Gogland, 200 kilometers from St. Petersburg, then headed towards the UK


      And yes, it all looks like bullshit.

    34. -1
      12 March 2023 16: 36
      That is why the capital should be, if not in Khabarovsk, then at least in Novosibirsk.
      A misunderstanding in the swamps is generally not viable in the event of a conflict, and Moscow is too close even to the current theater of operations.
      And the fact that the actions of the enemy were absolutely legal in this case does not matter.
      1. 0
        13 March 2023 05: 36
        Yes, even if not the capital, but all strategic military command and control should definitely be in Siberia, and not in Moscow and not in St. Petersburg, given the size of the country! All strategically important facilities (financial, communications, etc.) must be urgently moved or duplicated at a safe distance from Moscow.
    35. -3
      12 March 2023 16: 48
      They just didn't try to knock it down. All bench .... bench
    36. +2
      12 March 2023 19: 19
      The most interesting thing is that in order to launch a cruise missile along St. Petersburg, he does not need to approach 200 km, where he will be confidently detected and destroyed with a probability of 0,89. they just love to do it. Falling into 1200 is not a problem, the question is how many RTR funds worked on it and lit up.
    37. -1
      13 March 2023 05: 32
      "Data on the flight route of the American strategist was provided by the Flightradar service ..."
      Well, since the service provided the data, it means all this is window dressing! They play with biceps striped ...
      Yes, our Caliber, of course, is a super-argument for all these "strategists". They need to enter the 200 km zone for launch, and we can strike at the Pentagon and other soft places from anywhere in the world!
    38. 0
      13 March 2023 10: 16
      A machine designed to strike from the North Pole in Moscow, approaches 200 km from the city and during the entire flight is accompanied by air defense with a practical range of 400 km.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"