The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation showed footage of the destruction of the Stormer HVM air defense system by the Lancet drone

52
The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation showed footage of the destruction of the Stormer HVM air defense system by the Lancet drone

Western air defense systems do not always help the Armed Forces of Ukraine to protect themselves from air attacks. Often they themselves become targets of blows. The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation showed footage of the destruction of the British-made Stormer HVM anti-aircraft missile system of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with high-precision loitering ammunition.

First, UAV crews operating in the Donetsk direction spotted a Ukrainian anti-aircraft missile system. Then, the air defense missile system was struck by the loitering ammunition "Lancet".



The crews of the UAV carried out control and fixation of the hit of the loitering ammunition in the anti-aircraft missile system. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, loitering munitions make it possible to quickly and effectively destroy the military equipment of Ukrainian formations. So, strikes of loitering ammunition are affected Tanks, armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, armored vehicles, self-propelled artillery mounts, artillery pieces and anti-aircraft missile systems.

Recall that the ZALA Lancet loitering ammunition, also known as the Lancet UAV, has been produced since 2019 by a Russian company that is part of the Kalashnikov concern. It is designed to destroy targets on the front line and behind enemy lines, primarily to destroy ground military equipment and weapons. Now Russian troops are actively using such Drones in the zone of special military operation.

  • Ministry of Defense of Ukraine
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    March 11 2023
    Why don't they burn effectively? Westerners need a wow show!
    1. +10
      March 11 2023
      Why don't they burn effectively?
      - kina should be watched less - the car does not explode from a pistol shot ...
      1. +4
        March 11 2023
        I don't watch films. I wrote "for Westerners"! Do you not know how to read or can you only master a couple of words?
        1. +14
          March 11 2023
          Well then, Westerners are less kin to watch, and I apologize to you hi
      2. +3
        March 11 2023
        Quote: faiver
        kina need to watch less - the car does not explode from a pistol shot ...

        American explode. Cinema doesn't lie
        1. +1
          March 11 2023
          Quote: Gritsa
          American explode. Cinema doesn't lie

          And to be objective, everything and everyone explodes, where it came to ammunition.
      3. 0
        March 11 2023
        Quote: faiver
        kina need to watch less

        The question is quite reasonable even for us. The extent of the damage is not known. The impossibility of recovery is not obvious.
        1. -1
          March 13 2023
          A lancet disables even a tank, and a blow of 3-5 kg ​​of TNT (plus drone fuel) will disable any other equipment, if it doesn’t destroy it, then at least it will disable it for a long time. Something is not visible that at least something was restored in the Armed Forces of Ukraine (even with non-critical damage). But what is visible is the mountains of scrap metal, which rusts in the fields ...
          1. +1
            March 13 2023
            The Lancet has two types of ammunition - high-explosive fragmentation (used less often) and cumulative (used often).
            Here is a blow with a cumulative charge. An installation from Germany, which seems to be intended to fight such UAVs, was destroyed by it. The UAV radar did not see her. This means that the EPR of this device allows such installations to be attacked without hindrance.
    2. +13
      March 11 2023
      Hit in the window carrier. Now, if it were higher, in rockets, then it would blaze.
      I watch such videos and see that the power of the Lancet is insufficient. 3 kg is not enough. Does not guarantee complete destruction.
      1. KCA
        +8
        March 11 2023
        I doubt that RDX with silver is used in such ammunition, and in rockets, so 3 kg of warhead may not be equal to 3 kg of TNT at all, but 6, for example
      2. +15
        March 11 2023
        For a tank, 3 kg is not enough, but the air defense system will probably no longer be able to shoot. Considering that the weapons are English - decommissioning forever.
        In general, we need a wide range of kamikaze drones. Bulk and cheap. In my opinion, this is the only chance to cope with that cloud of various lend-lease equipment of the enemy.
        1. +1
          March 11 2023
          agree. The anti-tank version of the lancet is missing. The point is not even in kilograms of explosives, but in the fact that it was some kind of armor-piercing head. Can be cumulative or combined.
          1. +7
            March 11 2023
            Has already. From a couple of months. With a cumulative head of 5 kg.
      3. 0
        March 13 2023
        If the charge is cumulative, then there will be no explosion effect, but the installation and the crew inside will no longer live.
        In addition, they did not show what was next after the attack.
        Perhaps the fire was lit later.
    3. +4
      March 11 2023
      I wonder what was hidden there in the side?!
      1. +11
        March 11 2023
        It didn’t hide, but rested - the carcass of the tank, the tower lay nearby.
      2. +9
        March 11 2023
        Quote: Argon
        I wonder what was hidden there in the side?!

        The tank was knocked out, with the turret torn off.
  2. +4
    March 11 2023
    Another plus in the piggy bank of our Victory ....
  3. +5
    March 11 2023
    Great job! Well done! More of them!!!
  4. +1
    March 11 2023
    Is that hit enough to kill?
    1. +5
      March 11 2023
      Often not, but enough to immobilize, and then finish off.
      Although operators do not always work correctly and correctly.
  5. +14
    March 11 2023
    We need a mega-factory for the production of Lantsets, hundreds per month. And you need it yesterday.
    1. +4
      March 11 2023
      You need something other than lancets. Still something with napalm
      1. AAK
        0
        March 11 2023
        With napalm, everything was invented for a long time back in the USSR, the question is - has it been preserved? Moreover, the matter did not come to the final destruction of the dill air defense in a year of the SVO ... And as for the results, there were recently videos with the destruction of the UAV of our "Tor" and "S-300V4" ... we are posting about them, they, unfortunately, spread about us ...
        1. +1
          March 11 2023
          Ukropsky air defense has long been destroyed. What is now being destroyed is already supplies from the west.
          1. 0
            March 11 2023
            Ukropsky air defense has long been destroyed. What is now being destroyed is already supplies from the west.

            Come on, S-300, "Buk" is that all according to your supplies from the West? Somehow they asked the rodents to return the "Buks" delivered in 08, and they were sent by the forest.
            1. +2
              March 11 2023
              And what couldn’t the S-300 bring from Greece? Someone else bought them in Europe. I don't remember now.
    2. +4
      March 11 2023
      Quote: MBRBS
      We need a mega-factory for the production of Lantsets, hundreds per month. And you need it yesterday.

      What about a plant for the production of high-capacity explosives?
      The power of the ammunition, in which aluminum hydride (hydrogenated aluminum) is used as an explosive (BB), from 30 to 300 times the power of ammunition with the same volume of trinitrotoluene (TNT).
      https://www.arms-expo.ru/analytics/perspektivnye-razrabotki/vzryvayushchiysya-metall-kotoryy-v-razy-moshchnee-trotila/
      I believe that the production of such an explosive would increase the efficiency of even handicraft drones with a payload of several hundred grams.
      hi
      1. +2
        March 11 2023
        What about a plant for the production of high-capacity explosives?
        - to hell with it, with increased power, we would have a plant for the production of brains for certain individuals ....
        1. -2
          March 11 2023
          Certain persons reproduce themselves and replace their brothers with sons (p.A_ trushv) and daughters (plywood marshal), etc. And strangers don't go there
  6. -3
    March 11 2023
    Well, at least it didn’t fly off to the side, as in cases of defeat of enemy self-propelled guns. Somehow it still doesn’t impress, where is the explosion of the affected vehicle, and not just the unmanned vehicle itself ?! From the video about the last Karabakh war, from the strikes from the UAV, the equipment really burned.
    1. +4
      March 11 2023
      There is no difference for you: Lancet - 12 kg, UMTAS (at Bayraktar) - 36 kg????????
      It's like comparing an infantry fighting vehicle with a tank.
  7. +9
    March 11 2023
    It’s good that the box was packed by operators, they slammed it in time.
  8. +8
    March 11 2023
    Defeat and destruction are two very different things. It is a pity that the author does not understand this. Or pretending not to understand.
  9. +1
    March 11 2023
    For armored vehicles, this lightweight version of the Lancet is rather weak. Damages but does not destroy.
  10. +4
    March 11 2023
    Ich werde erst wirklich zufrieden sein, wenn ich solche
    Bilder vom Buckingham Palace, der London Bridge, von
    Big Ben und Downing Street Nr.10 sehe, wo das "Personal"
    vergeblich versucht bereits brennend zu fliehen...!!!!!!!!!
  11. +4
    March 11 2023
    Hit the front armor plate. And there 25 mm. Break through?
    1. Judging by the fact that the video ends immediately after the explosion of the Lancet, the target did not catch fire. And if the crew crap, it’s not visible from the drone.
      In general, this crew is stupid - I counted 8! (Eight) traces of a turn in almost one place - they were not taught to change positions ...
      1. +3
        March 11 2023
        Quote: The collective farm is a voluntary business.
        In general, this crew is stupid - I counted 8! (Eight) traces of a turn in almost one place - they were not taught to change positions ...

        Do the British really know that they can be hit with a racket?
      2. 0
        March 13 2023
        Some kind of problem with them seems to be with friction clutches?
  12. +3
    March 11 2023
    I don't see destruction. I only see a hit.
  13. +3
    March 11 2023
    There is a lot of criticism for criticism. Zala Lancet Kalasnikhov is one of the Russian guns that inflicts the greatest damage on the enemy. This is openly acknowledged in the Western press. It gives excellent results against armored vehicles, radios, etc., although it is true that there should be an option with more explosive power for tanks, and I believe that work is already underway on it. My compliments to Russian technology in this Kalashnikov case.
  14. +1
    March 11 2023
    - More "Lancets"!... - effective and different... Today is a technology war. The higher and more diverse the technologies, the less the loss of personnel in the trenches ...
  15. -2
    March 11 2023
    In essence, there is nothing supernatural. Initially, it was clear that this MANPADS was overgrown, there were no special prospects. That is why it is strenuously fused into Banderland.
  16. +1
    March 11 2023
    There, not far away, there is still a tank and a tower lying around.
  17. +3
    March 11 2023
    It's very fun when it is the air defense that is destroyed, which seems to be supposed to fight this technique
  18. -2
    March 11 2023
    If you throw out all the stuffing (damaged) and armor (not needed), can you make a tractor out of this thing? laughing
  19. 0
    March 11 2023
    And I did not see that there was something shattered into pieces. The charge is small
  20. +1
    March 11 2023
    another video after which the question arises - what can destroy the lancet? passenger car? weak even for lightly armored targets
  21. 0
    March 13 2023
    Kremlin propaganda. We all know (VO taught) that Russia does not have reconnaissance, and even more so, strike UAVs. laughing
  22. 0
    March 13 2023
    You have to be more precise in the wording, otherwise they start laughing at Kanashenkov, they didn’t destroy him, but they hit him, and this, as they say in Odessa, is two big differences. And then it’s full of all sorts of videos, a tank flies a few meters on a mine and further edits, the crew stops and climbs out and does an inspection, obviously they are in adequate condition.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"