The commander of the special forces "Akhmat" Alaudinov suggested where the Armed Forces of Ukraine can use Leopard tanks for the first time

39
The commander of the special forces "Akhmat" Alaudinov suggested where the Armed Forces of Ukraine can use Leopard tanks for the first time

Now Tanks The German-made Leopard, whose deliveries to Ukraine have already begun, do not appear on the front line. The commander of the special forces "Akhmat" and the assistant to the head of the Chechen Republic, Major General Apty Alaudinov, spoke about this on the air of the Rossiya 1 TV channel.

It is possible that the Ukrainian command is going to launch German tanks on a counteroffensive when the operation to unblock Artemovsk (Ukrainian name Bakhmut) begins, General Alaudinov stressed. The Ukrainian command plans to carry out this operation with the help of three groups of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.



Such words of the special forces commander may well turn out to be a plausible forecast, since the Kyiv regime has very high hopes for Western military equipment. In Kyiv, they may believe that the tanks will help them unlock the city.

Unfortunately, I still cannot boast that I saw "Leopards" here

- said the commander of "Akhmat" on the air of the TV channel "Россия 1».

Alaudinov also noted that all Akhmat special forces soldiers are ready to meet Leopard tanks. This is due to the fact that the fighters dream of getting a solid bonus, which is promised for every captured Leopard.

Recall that Germany and a number of other European countries have begun deliveries of German-made Leopard tanks to Ukraine.

The Russian leadership has repeatedly stated that the supply of Western military equipment and weapons only contributes to the further aggravation of the conflict and its prolongation, and by no means brings a peaceful settlement closer.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    10 March 2023 20: 56
    Alaudinov also noted that all Akhmat special forces soldiers are ready to meet Leopard tanks.

    It cannot be otherwise! We must wish the guys military happiness and good luck!
    1. +6
      10 March 2023 21: 54
      This is due to the fact that the fighters dream of getting a solid bonus, which is promised for every captured Leopard.

      Oh, this "Golden Calf", everywhere, the reptile psychologically penetrates. Look guys, don't forget to be careful.
      1. +5
        10 March 2023 21: 59
        Lady! hi Well, here he is already working for us! let them earn!
        1. -11
          10 March 2023 22: 14
          Perhaps the point is that the money will someday run out, and their remnants will be crushed by the American "oil ceiling". And then what? There is no ideology yet (moreover, it is prohibited by the Constitution), but there is no money
          1. +2
            11 March 2023 09: 54
            Quote: DigitalError
            no more money

            Have you run out of money?
            Or are you worried about the budget of the Russian Federation?
            So you should not worry about it - there is a lot of money and enough for a long time.
            You were embarrassed ... "budget deficit"? smile
            Well, firstly, such a deficit has long been a sign of a "developed democratic society", because in "democratic countries" budgets are almost always in short supply, and they do not bother at all.
            Secondly, Russia has very large reserve funds (despite the arrest / theft of 300+ billion dollars by Western democracies), which will be enough to cover such a deficit for 6 or even 10 years. Yes
            In addition, the financial year has just begun, many contracts and government orders (including a sharply expanded state defense order) have come into force, which must be secured with advance payments. Then it goes much smoother.
            Quote: DigitalError
            will be crushed by the American "oil ceiling"

            But who cares about these ceilings, if Russian business now prefers to transport its oil by its own ships (now leaving the cost of transportation to itself) and insure the transported goods in OWN insurance companies (this money also remains in Russian jurisdiction and turnover).
            But in the US and the EU, from these ceilings they will soon dance to the collapse of the economies ... they have already begun to RECOMMEND their companies to BUY Russian oil lol though with the proviso that the ceilings are observed ... But who will sell them on such conditions wassat . We will have to buy from our Indian (and other) subsidiaries, Chinese traders and ... mainly already in a processed (petroleum products) form. lol
            Quote: DigitalError
            no ideology yet

            Yes, how not? Do you live in the forest?
            In the Russian Federation - capitalism with feudal methods of management.
            This is the ideology. bully
            Yes, not Marxism-Leninism, but the people who put this ideology into practice ... are very ideological. Yes And for their ideology, they will tear anyone.
            request It's just the ideology of the ruling class.
            And all other types of ideology, yes, are PROHIBITED.
            Quote: DigitalError
            money will eventually run out

            In the light of the 25.02.2022. on abandoning the "Budget Rule" and domonetization of the Russian economy from 52% (actually it was a little more than 40%) to 70% (and it is necessary to have 95 - 100% up to the global norm), Russia can freely conduct annual domonetization in the amount of 50 - 100 billion dol. in ruble terms. smile
            Do you think this will be enough to cover the budget deficit ?
            In addition, it is budget financing that is the most effective way of additional monetization. wink
            And this will steadily stimulate GDP growth (in the most natural way) and budget revenues from all types of payments. Yes
            Quote: DigitalError
            And then what?

            And then, despite the war \ SVO, sanctions and attempts at isolation, the Russian economy will ... grow Yes Moreover, at an increasing pace.
            And the world prices for energy resources will grow . Yes For - the shortage and cheap oil (and gas) has long ended.
            1. -4
              11 March 2023 11: 20
              Quote: bayard
              You were confused ... "budget deficit"

              Not at all. I was confused by the motivation of the fighters. When (and if) there will be no prizes they dream of, where will they go from the front? At Moscow construction sites for bonuses?
              Quote: bayard
              Russia has very large reserve funds

              Now it has become obvious to you too - there were none to maintain the previous retirement age, but they were found in the NWO.
              Quote: bayard
              in the US and the EU, these ceilings will soon dance to the collapse of the economies

              Sure sure. Therefore, they are strenuously introduced for purely masochistic reasons. Remove the noodles from your ears and look at the dollar exchange rate / the dynamics of stock prices for gas in Europe.
              Quote: bayard
              cheap oil (and gas) has long ended

              Ask the Indians and the Chinese if they buy our oil and gas at a high price. And ask yourself the question - why, in fact, we sell at a discount? Ah, well, yes. Brotherly peoples...
              1. 0
                12 March 2023 04: 09
                Quote: DigitalError
                . I was confused by the motivation of the fighters. When (and if) there will be no prizes they dream of - where will they go from the front?

                And the fact that during the Second World War, Soviet soldiers received cash rewards for downed planes, knocked out tanks, destroyed guns, warehouses, headquarters, for each military award there was ... a pension (!) - on an ongoing basis, as an additional payment to salaries (cancelled when Khrushchev). And these (especially for planes, tanks, ships) were very considerable payments. Some payments began to be made after the war, when all reports and reports were systematized.
                Not embarrassed by such a motivation of the Soviet people? Who were motivated enough without it?
                So what confuses you in the capitalist Russian Federation, where from school years they teach that money is the head of everything, the main measure and purpose of existence?
                Moreover, apart from the Ministry of Defense, which announced bonuses for the destruction of specific targets, a number of Russian banks and companies also announced an award for the same Leopard-2, Leclerc and Abrams tanks with the Challenger-2. How to contribute your own contribution to the victory. And so that life does not seem like a raspberry to foreign panzers in the South Russian lands ... that every stick, every bush and ruin was fired at them. I think this is worthy and fair. A worthy reward for heroism should bring the hero joy and zeal for new exploits.
                Quote: DigitalError
                Now it has become obvious to you too - there were none to maintain the previous retirement age

                It was obvious to me for a very long time that the authorities of the Russian Federation had long been leading everything towards canceling pensions AT ALL. They have already begun to prepare society for this idea, for several years they advised - "get ready, soon there will be no pensions at all."
                Quote: DigitalError
                but found on the NWO.

                They (reserves) were always there, they were redundant, they did not go to the development of the country, they were boasted of as an achievement. But they were ALWAYS. And there were a LOT of them.
                Now the "elites of the Russian Federation" themselves have burned out and the money has gone to the NWO. And they even began to invest in their own production.
                I wrote that there is money to cover the naturally occurring budget deficit. They are sufficient to cover such a deficit for 6-10 years. And the deficit is due to the fact that budget spending on defense and financing of national projects has increased dramatically. And it is very good that they have increased, because in this way they will remain/return inside the country. And this by itself results in the growth of GDP and tax deductions to the same budget.
                Quote: DigitalError
                Quote: bayard
                in the US and the EU, these ceilings will soon dance to the collapse of the economies

                Sure sure. Therefore, they are strenuously introduced for purely masochistic reasons.

                This is the HYSTERIC of a torn hegemon. They want, as before (before the NWO), to buy oil in the Russian Federation for ... 40-41 dollars. per barrel. Yes Regardless of world prices on the stock exchanges. 25.02.2022/40/41. the guarantor of stability announced that the "Budget rule" (according to which the Russian Federation sold oil no more than 250-XNUMX dollars) ceases to operate and Russia will sell the resource at world prices. And this gave the Russian Federation last year, in excess of all expectations, at least XNUMX billion dollars.
                Haven't heard of this?
                How much do you think this will be enough to cover budget deficits in the future ?
                Quote: DigitalError
                Remove the noodles from your ears and look at the dollar /

                What's the difference to you from the dollar exchange rate? The grown dollar will provide additional revenues to the budget in ruble terms and will reduce (or completely cover it) the same budget deficit.
                You still do not understand WHY from time to time we raise the dollar? bully Just for this.
                Quote: DigitalError
                on the dynamics of exchange prices for gas in Europe.

                What do you know about these prices? lol laughing
                Do you even understand what these prices are and how they affect domestic prices for the European consumer? smile
                Do not know .
                They are not reflected at all.
                Do you know why?
                Yes, because during the summer of last year, European gas storages were filled with gas at a price of 2200 - 2500 dollars. for 1000 m.2. Yes And that’s it. Yes Apparently they were expecting even higher prices. And then there was simply nowhere to buy. All the more so that European consumers have stopped buying gas altogether or have drastically reduced such purchases. They just stopped production so as not to go bankrupt. As a result, the new gas carriers that came to Europe could not be unloaded (the storage facilities are full) and the LNG owners found themselves in a dilemma - either drag themselves to Southeast Asia and try to sell there (without having a contract in their hands), or ... try to drop the price and that's it to unload.
                And they had to dance in their prices already from the prices in Southeast Asia ... and there the prices were seriously LOWER (because they buy there under LONG-TERM contracts, and not according to European cunning inventions) ... So prices appeared in European ... much lower the former ones ... but there is EVERYTHING to unload.
                Meanwhile, European gas owners have fallen into the trap of their hoarding at maximum prices ... and are forced to sell gas ... not even at horse prices, but at hyper horse prices. Yes They puff, try, and the industry of the EU is rapidly dying.
                And the European consumer himself cannot buy gas on the exchange, where prices have fallen ... because the entire gas transportation and distribution system belongs ... to the owners of super-expensive gas.
                The US is very happy. European producers, willy-nilly, reached out to the USA (where gas is cheap) ... but most are still in Southeast Asia, Turkey, somewhere else away from the USA.


                Quote: DigitalError
                Ask the Indians and the Chinese if they buy our oil and gas at a high price.

                Yes, they themselves do not hide (official reports of the Ministry of Finance). The average price of Urals Russian oil in China in December was $91 per barrel. And in India - $ 93 (logistics are more expensive).
                Do not want to compare with the "ceilings"? smile
                But this is even somewhat higher than stock prices.
                Why is that ?
                Yes, because many do not care about these exchanges if they buy under direct contracts, often completely non-public. And this is against the background of an acute shortage of heavy grades of oil on the market.
                Quote: DigitalError
                And ask yourself the question - why, in fact, we sell at a discount?

                And you still did not know to whom, when and why?
                This is in the case of selling oil in our port. If the buyer exports by his own tankers or charters on the side. Here, to cover transport, insurance ... But Russian exporters today prefer to export oil with their own Yes tankers. And they carry. And for this purpose, we have already purchased over 600 tankers, dry cargo ships, and ocean-class gas carriers on the secondary market.
                Quote: DigitalError
                Well, yes. Brotherly peoples...

                Where did you meet brotherhood under capitalism? With such a wonderful system, as a rule, brother vomits his throat. WWI, WWII, NATO robbery in Yugoslavia, and the current massacre under the NWO index - exclusively showdowns between fraternal peoples (of the same race). And the Indians and Chinis are blood brothers request well, it doesn't come out. But partnership without mutual discrimination and with mutual respect for interests, culture, customs ... yes. At least from our side.
                But there will be no gifts "for brotherhood". Capitalism.
      2. +1
        10 March 2023 22: 43
        Common sense should not be forgotten, this is the main thing in any business. And don't chase them.

        video not playing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JchK_aFA8gk
  2. 0
    10 March 2023 20: 59
    It is necessary not to predict where the Leopards will appear at the front, but to demand weapons that these Leopards will reliably destroy. In principle, perhaps the Kornets will cope with them, but I would like the troops to receive other weapons: cheaper, more powerful and more numerous. And one whose operators will be safe, unlike the operators of the Cornets.
    1. 0
      10 March 2023 21: 10
      What weapon are we talking about? Tell me.
      1. -2
        10 March 2023 21: 27
        Javelins...
        .......
        ...........
        1. SSR
          +4
          10 March 2023 22: 34
          Quote: Argon
          Javelins...
          .......
          ...........

          We read.

          Thus, the maximum firing range of the American Javelin anti-tank systems is 2,5 km. At the "Cornet" - 5,5 km. In the Kornet-D modification, it has been brought up to 10 km.

          The maximum range of leoperds, you yourself can.

          The main armament of the Leopard is a 120 mm smoothbore gun. The length of the gun barrel is 5520 mm. Aimed firing range: in a static position - 3 m, in motion - 500 m. The main sight is EMES-2, which was specially developed for this tank model by Zeiss.
          topwar.ru

          In general, your hope for javelins is not entirely clear.
          1. -1
            11 March 2023 07: 57
            Well, if not javelins then nlavy. There the essence is "shot - forgot." And with laser guidance, this is no longer ice. They detect targeting and if they don’t attack first, they can get away from the attack at such distances that you are talking about.
      2. 0
        11 March 2023 01: 20
        For example, FPV drones, with markings from RPGs. Control glasses and remote control are reusable. The kamikaze drog itself costs 30000-40000 rubles. Range 2km. In the presence of a retroslator drone, it can also be a reconnaissance aircraft - 10 km.
      3. -1
        12 March 2023 00: 29
        I would like to express my proposal, but there is no one. If these gentlemen have not been able to agree on tank grills for years, then offering something that requires interdepartmental and intersectoral coordination and cooperation is stupid.
        I think if the Kremlin's policy on the issue of weapons improves, then our designers will think of such things themselves and quickly.
    2. 0
      10 March 2023 21: 48
      Why are geraniums bad? 100 times cheaper than a tank. To them, only video cameras with an IR range should be attached.
      Maybe Lancets. If they don’t blow up the BC, then they will blind, and therefore immobilize for sure.
      1. +4
        10 March 2023 21: 57
        Geraniums and the like, unlike loitering ammunition such as the Lancet, are not maneuverable. They plan well, which gives them long range, but they are not nimble and relatively small and it is difficult to hit the target with them. (Or almost impossible)
        1. +2
          11 March 2023 01: 44
          Gygygy. And the tanks are highly maneuverable.))) I can imagine how the pilot of Leoperda sharply pulls the steering wheel towards himself and the car goes into a nose up.
    3. -6
      10 March 2023 21: 51
      Yeah. Demand Battle Blasters from the MO!! With Leopard blasters, we are not afraid. And if you demand Plasma Throwers, the Leopards will generally be covered.
    4. 0
      11 March 2023 04: 33
      Quote: also a doctor
      In principle, perhaps the Kornets will cope with them, but I would like the troops to receive other weapons: cheaper, more powerful and more numerous. And one whose operators will be safe, unlike the operators of the Cornets.

      Better let it be attack helicopters on the way to the front line. And even better - long-range MLRS and artillery at their bases.
      1. -1
        11 March 2023 20: 15
        Quote: Gritsa
        Better let it be attack helicopters on the way to the front line. And even better - long-range MLRS and artillery at their bases.

        Or you can also use the good old military method from the last century: the D-20 howitzer - direct fire. She, unlike the Rapier, has a range of hoo. On a straight line - it will be quite effective. And safe (from the side of the tanks, for sure).
  3. +2
    10 March 2023 21: 00
    "Leopards" will be used only after the soil has dried, along with the French "WHEELS" ...
    1. +1
      10 March 2023 21: 08
      And Bradley, all heavy Western equipment will be brought under one command and control, for maximum efficiency.
      1. -2
        10 March 2023 22: 17
        Quote: spirit
        and management

        electronically controlled, in which each "own" infantry fighting vehicle is displayed on an interactive map, which allows you not to waste time identifying an object that has appeared in the sight (your? someone else's?), but to immediately strike at it ...
  4. 0
    10 March 2023 21: 16
    It’s like professionals are sitting there? In the conditions of destroyed houses, mudslides, as they are going to enter it, the tanks will not pass. The leopard is good at night, and in an ambush.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      11 March 2023 02: 07
      The leopard is good at night and in ambush.

      and somewhere in Germany
  5. 0
    10 March 2023 21: 20
    Maybe that's why they don't close the ring around Bakhmut.?
  6. +1
    10 March 2023 21: 24
    When planning a nuclear strike on Russia, the United States is counting on a single-stage crushing disarming strike on fundamentally important targets. By analogy with the above, it can be assumed that the Western curators of the Ukrainian General Staff will plan during the spring offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to deliver a short massive strike with all the artillery available to them. by means of our previously explored main goals: ammunition depots, weapons depots, places of deployment and transport communications to the maximum depth from the LBS. The main direction, without a doubt, is Azov. At the same time, all armored vehicles received by the Armed Forces for the winter / spring will be thrown here. So don't wait for Leopards now. It makes no sense to smear them all over the LBS.
  7. +4
    10 March 2023 22: 03
    Tanks will not be used for fighting on the front line. Most likely, Leopards, French chariots, and Bradley and other armored vehicles will be used after breaking through the front line in the steppe area (Melitopol or Kherson region), and not in buildings, by analogy with mobile groups during operations in the Kharkiv region last autumn.
  8. 0
    10 March 2023 22: 16
    But it’s interesting, everyone who confidently joyfully and patriotically wrote articles that the West will not supply tanks or will supply a couple of pieces - are they foreign agents?
  9. -1
    10 March 2023 22: 23
    Kyiv has (Soviet) tanks. There is no need to use Western tanks in the battles for Artemovsk. The need for these tanks is connected with the planned spring offensive - more precisely, in tanks in general.
  10. +2
    10 March 2023 22: 31
    Quote from solar
    Tanks will not be used for fighting on the front line. Most likely, Leopards, French chariots, and Bradley and other armored vehicles will be used after breaking through the front line in the steppe area (Melitopol or Kherson region), and not in buildings, by analogy with mobile groups during operations in the Kharkiv region last autumn.

    In the steppe area, tanks also don’t have much chance ... because it’s simply not possible for either side to suppress all the artillery with impudence, and advancing gradually entails heavy losses of both artillery and armored vehicles
    They will look for the thinnest line of defense, counting on its quick breakthrough and expansion with the help of a massive strike of armored vehicles.
    We have enough artillery in the main directions ... obstacles too ... so that they will look for a thin line with fewer trunks
    The tactics of small armor groups with the current number of vehicles that are expanding can be successful again
    For this they have all the intelligence and strategists of NATO
    1. 0
      11 March 2023 01: 07
      The tactics of small armor groups with the current number of vehicles that are expanding can be successful again

      I'm talking about exactly this. If this happened in the Kharkiv region with ordinary pickups, then with armored vehicles it will be even more effective.
  11. -4
    10 March 2023 22: 46
    Members of the forum, don't you think that we do not live correctly?
  12. +1
    10 March 2023 23: 20
    The Czechs are already waiting for the Leopards, the reward is drying up for the heroes!
    Allaudinov is a fucking man! One of the best commanders at the front. A very objective person. And he has been fighting for years.
    And, in general, why is everyone so worried about these Fritz tanks? So many tanks have already been burned there in nine years that one more, one less won't change much. If a Ukrainian was given a thousand tanks, then it would be important. A few dozen will not change the course of events.
    Yesterday at Solovyov's, Bagdasarov gave statistics on the use of Bradley and Abrams in Iraq. Of the more than a thousand tanks, mattresses lost more than half. And out of more than two thousand Bradleys, less than a thousand went home. And these are dry statistics.
    Joy, of course, is not enough from this, but we have no choice - we will burn them.
    1. 0
      11 March 2023 01: 15
      Gulf War (1991), 1800 Abrams of various modifications.
      A much more advanced aiming system, better crew training and the use of depleted uranium ammunition allowed Abrams tanks to hit Iraqi vehicles at distances far exceeding the effective firing range of the latter (125-mm ZBM9 [89] Iraqi T-72 shells .... As a result, in the vast majority of tank battles, the victory was for the Abrams .... On February 26, there was a major tank battle with the Iraqi division Tauvahalna, during the battle the Abrams destroyed 24 T-72 tanks, losing 4 tanks knocked out. [ 88].

      According to the final report of the US Department of Defense before the US Congress, 18 tanks were lost and damaged during the war[94]. At the same time, according to the US Army, a total of 23 Abrams were shot down during the war, of which 9 were completely destroyed[95]. The incapacitation of "Abrams" (up to 4) by Iraqi tanks is confirmed by official American documents.
  13. 0
    11 March 2023 04: 29
    We also have SPBE for such purposes for both aviation and RSZO. True, I have not yet heard that they were used.
  14. 0
    11 March 2023 05: 15
    Well, what is special about this tank, a tank is like a tank. In the Great Patriotic War, they also scared tigers and leopards.
  15. 0
    11 March 2023 09: 22
    For good, it is necessary to cover them in the rear, so as not to risk our guys.