The Ministry of Defense showed the work of the crews of T-90 tanks in the NVO zone

The Ministry of Defense published a video showing the work of Russian crews tanks T-90 in the zone of the special operation in Ukraine.

In the video, tankers of the Western Military District provide fire support to motorized rifle units, thereby providing conditions for the offensive operations of the Russian army in the zone of the special operation.

You can also see how the crews of T-90 tanks advance to positions adjacent to the front edge of the enemy defense line, after which they inflict powerful fire damage on enemy troops. First of all, the positions of anti-tank weapons and armored vehicles of the enemy are destroyed.

Despite the mortar shelling of the enemy, the scout, who corrected the fire of the tankers, continued to make adjustments. He managed to calculate the location of the enemy artillery crews, after which he transmitted their coordinates to the tank crews. As a result, the enemy battery was completely destroyed.

Often, tankers taking part in a special operation conduct flanking fire on the move. This technique significantly increases the survivability of equipment in combat conditions.

The Russian T-90M "Proryv" tank is one of the most modern combat vehicles in the world. After a series of upgrades, tanks of this type were equipped with the latest dynamic protection, modern communications and a more powerful engine.

The T-90 proved to be excellent during the fighting in the special operation zone in Ukraine. At the same time, such tanks will have to meet the German "Leopards" on the battlefield in the near future.

Comments

[alexmach]

You can also see how the crews of T-90 tanks advance to positions adjacent to the front edge of the enemy defense line, after which they inflict powerful fire damage on enemy troops. First of all, the positions of anti-tank weapons and armored vehicles of the enemy are destroyed.

And why do tankers and not artillery?

[Valery_V]

probably she is not in this place, so the tanks are shooting

[Mol_18]

On a military review 1,5-2 months ago, they wrote about the fact that from such shooting at closed positions, the barrels of tanks deteriorate very much, because. shoot high-explosive fragmentation. And the barrel of the tank is smoothbore, and the artillery is rifled.
It is necessary to release as much more modern art, or at least acacias and carnations modernized with active rockets, in order to shoot down NATO art.

[alexmach]

Well, here they actually fired direct fire, but it’s still not clear why not do the same with artillery.

the trunks of tanks deteriorate very much, tk. shoot high-explosive fragmentation

Well, actually they said that from high-explosive fragmentation it’s not so much that the resource of the barrel is spent, but it’s still suspicious ..

We need to release as much more modern art

Yes, at least it’s normal to shoot from storage. There was an article about the "Acacias" killed in the trash from storage. There is still a lot in storage, albeit not the most modern, but quite applicable artillery.

[Mol_18]

I also read about Acacias killed in the trash, most likely they were engaged in parasitism, they removed parts from the self-propelled guns for storage, and put them on those that are in parts

[Aerodrome]

The Russian tank T-90M "Proryv" is one of the most modern combat vehicles in the world.

mantra ... to the limit of 72 made. not bad, yes, 20 years ago. and now dviglo for 14 is a problem. I don’t even want to develop this topic.

[Mol_18]

but it’s still not clear why not do the same with artillery.

Artoy why drive closer, the tasks of artillery are to beat from afar, from 10 km and further. For self-propelled guns, direct fire can cause death, there is very little armor on self-propelled guns.

[BARKAS]

The barrels of tanks deteriorate most of all from firing a sub-caliber projectile there, a powder charge with an additional one, and the barrels of "Acacias" were spoiled a lot in Chechnya.

[solar]

Well, here they actually shot at direct fire ...

Judging by the slope of the barrel, it is, but for some reason I didn’t see any gaps at the points of impact. Where were they shooting?

[Diger]

that from such shooting at closed positions the barrels of tanks deteriorate very much, because shoot high-explosive fragmentation. And the barrel of the tank is smooth-bore, and the artillery is rifled

1. High-explosive projectile muzzle velocity is significantly less than armor-piercing and bops, charge
less propellant is used
2. A smooth-bore barrel has wear when fired almost 2 times less than that of a rifled one, if not 3 (but this is not accurate).
And it’s not so easy to clean it (you can do it without a chock)
3. What is direct fire, what is ballistic: wear depends only on the mass of what is thrown and the charge mv.
Above the uvn, anyway, the barrel cannot be lifted, but these angles are calculated.
From 1 + 2 + 3 = they wrote nonsense (purely my opinion)

[Vasily Oboskalov]

All our flowers on them under the bright sun!

[Diger]

And why do tankers and not artillery?

Why artillery

advance to positions adjacent to forward edge of the enemy's line of defense

?

What would it be shrugged even in the process of nomination, before deployment?
And yes, the tank is secretly advancing, reveals

positions of anti-tank weapons and armored vehicles of the enemy.

then it destroys.

[_Ugene_]

the Ministry of Defense only shows such videos, they went somewhere, shot somewhere, left, the helicopter took off, left the nurses somewhere in the sky, turned around, flew away, very informative

[Nikanor1993]

But a beautiful field, a beautiful tank, landscape, angle, sky, a solid five for artistry. True, yes, it’s not clear where they are shooting and why they are turning stern to the place they were shooting at, it’s also not very clear, but you can also see it for beauty. The only thing you need to modify is the automatic loader so that it works more smoothly, otherwise it twitches, it’s not beautiful.

[Ryaruav]

and a couple more of our generals for armor, then a complete still life from the marine rf

[veteran tanker]

Where is the promised video? What is flank fire of tanks? I am an old tanker, and I don’t know such words!

[Valery_V]

Flank fire.
Firing with an artillery gun (subunit) at targets on the flank of the enemy's battle formations.

[Diger]

Flank fire

But there is not a word about the flank fire of tanks.
The Ministry of Defense will not let you lie

True, the TSB is not so categorical

Flank fire, a type of artillery fire, tanks, small arms, leading to the flank of the target. F. o., especially conducted on open targets, is much more effective than frontal and oblique aiming, it is the most effective and requires less ammunition and time to defeat or destroy targets. For more information on types of fire, see Art. Fire.

[Dost]

Flank fire is shooting on the move away from the tank. Driving through the streets, he shoots between houses at a chosen target and, accordingly, he covers himself with houses.

[tralflot1832]

The work of the automatic loader is in all its glory, which is why the NATO "sheds" are so big.

[Normann]

So where to plant a black man?)
Sorry, I'm not smart enough to write a normal comment

[tralflot1832]

The barn needs to be made bigger and there will be a place for the loader, but the barn will be heavier and more expensive. And when a landmine hits the "barn", it is not known how the loader will behave, maybe he will just cry and look for EM-JE. ​​What shells in the breech, who am I and where am I. And so just press the button, the automation will not shit, it fails 50 / 50. And in the tank, the most important thing is not to watch.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: tralflot1832

.And so just press the button, the automation will not shit, it fails 50/50.

Or it ends the necessary shots. For OFS, and godfathers, and crowbars, and TOURS need to be crammed into only 22 cells.
And the loader has a shed behind the turret with 36 shots. Yes, and in the BO there are only 6 shots of the first stage, and not the entire BC, around which the crew sits.

[voyaka uh]

The losses of the T-90 from Javelins and grenades from drones are the same as those of the T-72.
From above, the vulnerability is the same.
And it is not possible to use improved frontal armor - there are no oncoming tank battles.

[Diger]

The losses of the T-90 from Javelins and grenades from drones are the same as those of the T-72.

This is not true, if only because the T-90xxx is several times smaller than the T-72xxx both there and in general

From above, the vulnerability is the same

I do not agree

[_Ugene_]

This is not true, if only because the T-90xxx is several times smaller than the T-72xxx and there

means as a percentage of the available quantity

I do not agree

and what, the new tower keeps the javelin hit from above? very doubtful
until there is KAZ, our tanks will also burn hundreds and thousands of birds and drones, but there will be no KAZ, everyone proves to the user that it is not needed, but infantry support is needed, apparently for a year now our tanks have not had infantry support since so many of them have already been burned

[Diger]

Do these % exist?
The person said the word (o = 90 and 72). But he did not prove it by deed (he did not bring anything).
And so it is: “Madam, can I crucify you? what do you mean lieutenant? But what I have, then I will introduce "

Well, about our Ministry of Defense, it’s better not to cheat. This is empty.
The active protection complex 1030M ("Drozd") in 1982-1983, and in 1983 was put into service, and in 1993?

The holy javelin has been in development since 1987. FGM-148 Entered service in 1996 or 97.
During this time, it was possible to equip all tanks with an arena and thrushes.
The generals were busy dividing the legacy of civilization.
Even the US javelins were dumped in Ukraine in 2021, a YEAR BEFORE SVOs, the number of 4500 pieces (but these are not accurate) and they conducted training openly, under the camera.
Did the kozhugetychi make the thread?
Huh?
They got the trash of the 70s from conservation and only
-----
It's simple.

[501Legion]

Often, tankers taking part in a special operation conduct flanking fire on the move. This technique significantly increases the survivability of equipment in combat conditions.

they are obliged to shoot at the movement, otherwise why are such tanks needed at all, which can only shoot from a place

[Denis812]

I am tormented by vague doubts, colleagues.
The videos are too promotional.
Someone came somewhere in a tank that is cleaner than my bike.
And it's cleaner inside. Although in such a mud, well, there will not be such a thing. Garless trunk, everything is white, yellow. Some kindergarten.
Then the tank fired beautifully somewhere. And the operator shot everything from a thousand angles.
And all this at the front. Under fire from a cruel enemy.

And what are they holding us for?

[_Ugene_]

housewives melt and melt
___________________________

[JokerSL]

They torment me too!)) Hiking is bullshit. I have outlined my doubts below.

[JokerSL]

It seemed to me alone that the tower hatch was open in the video?
This could mean two things:
1) the hatch was opened so that there was more light for shooting, i.e. a promotional video was filmed.
2) the hatch is open due to the negligence of the fighters. This is a flight, if the tank is in battle, the hatch must be closed.
Another question: for whom was the machine gun scribbling so furiously? There's not a soul around for a few versts)).

[fax66]

"You can also see how the crews of T-90 tanks advance to positions adjacent to the front edge of the enemy's defense line, after which they inflict powerful fire damage on enemy troops. First of all, positions of anti-tank weapons and enemy armored vehicles are destroyed."

For example, I don’t see a damn “powerful fire defeat” .... For 90% of video reports in this style, show shooting equipment and describe in words what they did there ....