Military Review

US presidential adviser Sullivan assessed the state of Russia's nuclear triad

40
US presidential adviser Sullivan assessed the state of Russia's nuclear triad

The United States currently maintains a dialogue with Russia on the issue of nuclear forces, regardless of the decision to suspend Moscow's participation in the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). Jake Sullivan, National Security Adviser to the President of the United States, stated this in an interview with CNN.


As the American official noted, the United States does not see changes in Russia's nuclear forces, including their combat readiness. Therefore, the American leadership does not consider it necessary to take any action to change the readiness of its own nuclear forces. The adviser to the American president did not expand on the Russian nuclear forces in more detail.

Earlier in the Western media, the question of whether Russia would use nuclear weapons began to be actively discussed. weapon in connection with the conflict in Ukraine. The public in the West was greatly alarmed by the statement of Russian President Vladimir Putin about the suspension of the country's participation in the START. Actually, for this reason, questions arose to the adviser to the American president.

Recall that Russia will no longer notify the West about the state of its nuclear forces. It is also impossible for US representatives to inspect Russia's nuclear facilities in the current situation, when the US and its satellites openly declare that their goal is the strategic defeat of our country.

In addition, the New START does not take into account the nuclear capabilities of Britain and France, which, as the conflict in Ukraine showed, act as a united front with the United States against Russia.
40 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 24 February 2023 08: 02
    0
    Therefore, the American leadership does not consider it necessary to take any action to readiness change own nuclear forces.
    Have they been ready for a long time?
    In addition, the New START does not take into account the nuclear capabilities of Britain and France, which, as the conflict in Ukraine showed, act as a united front with the United States against Russia.
    recourse Well, who would have guessed that? Okay, the conflict has been revealed... fool fool
    1. ivan1979nkl
      ivan1979nkl 24 February 2023 09: 28
      +1
      Have they been ready for a long time?

      every day they clean their nuclear muzzle
  2. ivan2022
    ivan2022 24 February 2023 08: 07
    -11
    We live in Russia... Therefore, even the possession of nuclear and anti-satellite weapons, created in the distant past, does not give any guarantees that they will really be used in accordance with the declared strategy and laws of the country.

    Even specific situations for the use of tactical nuclear weapons were stipulated a long time ago ..... But in practice, we will never use it. And what is there to say about strategic forces .....

    As the joke says, "But why not sigh in Voronezh? There are no relatives there ...."
  3. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. 24 February 2023 08: 15
    +4
    Quote: ivan2022
    Even specific situations for the use of tactical nuclear weapons were stipulated a long time ago ..... But in practice, we will never use it. And what is there to say about strategic forces .....

    You are too optimistic...
    Could you, for example, assume a sudden NWO on February 24.02.2022, XNUMX.
    Under certain conditions, nuclear weapons will certainly be used ... no one knows in advance their future, neither we, nor the Americans, nor the Europeans.
    Otherwise, I consider it absolutely vital that Russia withdraw from START.
    The US and NATO should not know our nuclear secrets ... this will be our guarantee against an attack by the Anglo-Saxons.
    1. ivan2022
      ivan2022 24 February 2023 08: 39
      -2
      "Sudden holding of NWO" I assumed since 2015 and assumed that we would still be bombed. I just did not expect that we would wait 8 years until the Armed Forces of Ukraine get stronger. So let's wait...

      And the START treaty was signed in order not to burden the economy. Drop it now-heh..heh...it's time for us. We don't have enough other problems right now.

      So the "optimist" is just you ...

      I repeat once again for those who have problems with perception: nuclear weapons, including tactical ones, should not be used "in the future", but in situations that are foreseen in advance.

      The use of nuclear weapons and weapons against satellites is not an apocalypse, but a method of warfare designed to be used, and not to pee in your pants at the thought of "pressing a button"

      So I can congratulate you in advance: when such a situation arises for NATO, they will use us quickly and like a cannon, everything that is supposed to be and that is provided for by the plans.
      1. Lech from Android.
        Lech from Android. 24 February 2023 09: 30
        0
        Quote: ivan2022
        And the START treaty was signed in order not to burden the economy. Drop it now-heh..heh...it's time for us. We don't have enough other problems right now.

        You might think he is not burdening us now.
        Quote: ivan2022
        when such a situation arises for NATO, they will use us quickly and like a cannon, everything that is supposed to be and that is provided for by the plans.

        But NATO needs it ... after all, Russia will use its entire arsenal in this case ... smile
        quickly and as if from a cannon everything that is supposed to be and that is provided for by the plans.
        Quote: ivan2022
        "Sudden holding of NWO" I assumed since 2015 and assumed that we would still be bombed.


        Well, Nostradamus smile ... and the end of the world is not predicted in your assumptions?
    2. ivan1979nkl
      ivan1979nkl 24 February 2023 09: 33
      0
      The US and NATO must not know our nuclear secrets...

      so that they don’t think to look into every launch shaft, stick their NATO influenza nose into every slot
  4. Silver99
    Silver99 24 February 2023 08: 28
    +5
    The United States considers it possible to keep its nuclear forces: aviation and medium-range missiles in close proximity to the Russian borders in Germany, Poland, Turkey ....., where the flight time is only 10 minutes, unlike ballistic missiles, where it is 30-40 minutes. The Caribbean crisis erupted precisely because of the deployment of nuclear weapons in Turkey, so in order to demonstrate "uncompromising goodwill" return missiles to Cuba, not so much for the sake of destroying the United States (the Strategic Missile Forces and nuclear submarines are enough for this), but so that they would feel the ticking of the doomsday clock day.
    1. 75 Sergey
      75 Sergey 24 February 2023 08: 32
      +7
      Yeah, and the Cubans are waiting for this - good luck!
      1. 1976AG
        1976AG 24 February 2023 08: 40
        0
        Quote: 75Sergey
        Yeah, and the Cubans are waiting for this - good luck!


        Did you ask them? They have been under sanctions all their lives and do not consider amers to be friends. I do not think that they will be against any goodies from our side in exchange for the placement of our weapons.
      2. Kostyar
        Kostyar 25 February 2023 12: 28
        0
        Yeah, and the Cubans are waiting for this - schaz

        Do you think they will refuse?
    2. dauria
      dauria 24 February 2023 08: 35
      0
      so can, in order to demonstrate "uncompromising goodwill", return missiles to Cuba,

      Does Cuba agree? Oligarchic Russia cannot even write Belarus into full-fledged allies, Azerbaijan and the Kazakhs are not clear who they lean against. And they swung at Cuba. How will you seduce them?
      1. Silver99
        Silver99 24 February 2023 08: 41
        +2
        If "oligarchic" Russia had not written off their debts of 30 billion. then they would definitely agree to the deployment of military bases of the Russian Federation to pay off the debt, it is necessary to work with foreign partners, not chat.
        1. BorzRio
          BorzRio 24 February 2023 09: 03
          -2
          If Russia had not written off Cuba's debts, it would have already gone over to the United States a long time ago. And there would be not only secret US prisons, but also military bases.
      2. 1976AG
        1976AG 24 February 2023 08: 43
        +4
        Belarus is slacking off because it has no doubts about us, and we are nearby. It is much harder for Cuba to confront its neighbor alone.
      3. ivan1979nkl
        ivan1979nkl 24 February 2023 09: 37
        +3
        Does Cuba agree?

        Cuba does not need to be seduced. Cubans would be honored to be able to defend their sovereignty
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 25 February 2023 00: 41
          +2
          Quote from ivan1979nkl
          Cuba does not need to be seduced. Cubans would be honored to be able to defend their sovereignty

          The Cubans remained true to their revolution... They are internationalists in spirit. I could see this for myself in Angola, when Cuban soldiers died but did not give up, standing up against South African tanks with grenade launchers ... for the MPLA and its leader, comrade Agostinho Neto. They were the ideological fighters of their REVOLUTION! Freedom or death! - and these are not just words, but rather an oath
    3. Thorvlobnor IV
      Thorvlobnor IV 24 February 2023 09: 24
      +1
      What kind of medium-range nuclear missiles does the United States keep in Europe?
      In Europe, there are about 100 tactical nuclear bombs on bases, which are not missiles at all, and the flight time there is completely different.
      1. mitroha
        mitroha 24 February 2023 11: 09
        0
        Quote: Torvlobnor IV
        In Europe, there are about 100 tactical nuclear bombs on bases, which are not missiles at all, and the flight time there is completely different

        You give a tooth, that everything is exactly like that? request
        1. Thorvlobnor IV
          Thorvlobnor IV 24 February 2023 15: 28
          +1
          Before the coronavirus, according to the agreement, mutual inspections of nuclear arsenals were carried out. Until then everything worked out. Now there are no inspections, it seems.
    4. avg
      avg 25 February 2023 11: 37
      0
      Quote from Silver99
      The United States considers it possible to keep its nuclear forces: air and medium-range missiles in close proximity to the Russian borders in Germany, Poland, Turkey ....., where the flight time is only 10 minutes, unlike ballistic missiles, where it is 30-40 minutes.

      Listen, well, what kind of medium-range missiles, what kind of nuclear forces? Understand the terms, understand the quantitative and qualitative ratio of American and our tactical nuclear weapons, and then draw conclusions.
  5. BorzRio
    BorzRio 24 February 2023 09: 00
    +2
    The US will survive the absence of inspections. Unlike Russia, the United States and other NATO countries have intelligence, there are hundreds of satellites, drones, aircraft, ships and the same agents monitoring our stationary and mobile launchers and carriers 24 hours a day. And you can generally keep silent about strategic aviation - Ukrainian kamikaze drones fly to its airfields.
    If Russia stirs up its strategic nuclear forces, the US will immediately notice it.
    1. ivan1979nkl
      ivan1979nkl 24 February 2023 09: 39
      +2
      The USA will notice it right away

      that's good, let them not fuss with START
    2. avg
      avg 25 February 2023 12: 04
      0
      Ui-yu-yu caught up with fear, and we are so orphaned and wretched ... wink Go get a cookie and a Pentagon Medal for Homeland Service.
  6. arnulla
    arnulla 24 February 2023 09: 04
    +1
    I was always surprised why, when signing treaties on nuclear weapons, we never required to take into account the nuclear ammunition of small-shaven and paddling pools?
    Are they intended against the Martians?)
    1. Thorvlobnor IV
      Thorvlobnor IV 24 February 2023 09: 27
      +5
      And about China, India and Pakistan, then why forget?
    2. mitroha
      mitroha 24 February 2023 11: 11
      0
      Quote: arnulla
      I was always surprised why, when signing treaties on nuclear weapons, we never required to take into account the nuclear ammunition of small-shaven and paddling pools?
      Are they intended against the Martians?)

      There was a bipolar world
      We do not know the secret agreements that were concluded at the same time or two
  7. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 24 February 2023 09: 04
    -1
    The whole treaty is dead. Without taking into account the nuclear forces of England and France, it is not viable. NATO countries are waging war with us in Ukraine until they win. An extremely unpleasant discovery for them that they have become targets for the time being, on paper. Previously, they stood in on the sidelines, and pretended that they had nothing to do with it. The START 3 treaty did not concern them. Now, if they want peace, they will have to be involved in the development of a new treaty. Otherwise, a nuclear war.
  8. Oleg Ogorod
    Oleg Ogorod 24 February 2023 09: 29
    -5
    It's funny, because the Americans will now let Russian ships with missiles sail to Cuba. They drown instantly. How the northern streams blew up. And we just got lost.
    And now there are not enough soldiers in the NMD, and you still want to send a considerable garrison to Cuba. In the USSR there was a population of 260 million, in Russia if 140 million are typed, and that's good. And even then, most of the population is over 45. A large number of pensioners. In the USSR, there were probably fewer pensioners, since many died in 1941-45. Life expectancy was shorter.
    And the economy of the USSR was on a war footing. Almost the entire industry worked for defense. Conscripts served in the army not for a year, as now, but for two or more. The army was several times larger in size. And conscripts were sent to hot spots, to the same Afghanistan after a little preparation. Not like now.
    But only now the children of many of our officials and political figures - patriots of Russia live in the USA, Europe, England.
    Better then in Voronezh ...
    And it seems like they suspended the operation of the treaty in terms of checks and the number of warheads, but with carriers everything is more complicated. They seem to have said they will not increase. And how can you increase them? An atomic weapon carrier costs a lot of money. Do you think we can now build a lot of Tu-160? Sarmat only to replace the Voyevoda, which is time to be disposed of, the Poplars are already scrapped, just the ones in the photo above, the Poplar M will also expire soon, the Yarsy are more or less fresh. The old boats with liquid blues were also almost gone, well, they made a few bores, but they are made for quite a long time and are expensive. What else do we have in the triad? Well, vanguards with a planning unit, but who saw how he flies? How many tests were there? One, two?
    It’s easy to produce a warhead, the technology has been worked out in the USSR, but it’s guaranteed to deliver it to the target ...
    This is a problem of problems.
    It is possible that when they were made, they thought that they would not fly, it would not matter there, there would be no one to figure out who allowed the marriage.
    The NVO showed that Russia's weapons are not the most advanced and not the most effective compared to NATO. This should probably be recognized.
    Is it possible to fix the situation immediately? Definitely not. Everything in the world has a force of inertia. Much needs to be changed unequivocally, but it will not be at the snap of a finger. The mentality of the people and the mentality of the authorities cannot be quickly changed, especially in power. Officials took up a reliable defense in the state, like Ukrainians near Donetsk. The year of the NWO, and the front remained near Donetsk.
    1. mitroha
      mitroha 24 February 2023 11: 22
      0
      Quote: Oleg Ogorod
      And now there are not enough soldiers in the NMD, and you still want to send a considerable garrison to Cuba.

      This is not even funny for you, you are a soldier in Lviv, joke if you don’t have enough. And you don’t seem to call it CBO. Are you celebrating an anniversary? Memorial service for Nazi Ukraine ... I understand
      1. Oleg Ogorod
        Oleg Ogorod 24 February 2023 14: 31
        -1
        Each understander understands by virtue of his mind and baggage of knowledge.
  9. Rus2012
    Rus2012 24 February 2023 23: 34
    0
    Russia will no longer notify the West about the state of its nuclear forces.

    ...and not only!
    Including the adoption of camouflage actions. And the separation and shelter of the strategic nuclear forces components.
    Now it won't be
  10. Raisa_Fyodorovna
    Raisa_Fyodorovna 25 February 2023 00: 09
    -2
    Quote: Lech from Android.
    You are too optimistic...
    Could you, for example, assume a sudden NWO on February 24.02.2022, XNUMX.

    Well, the Americans first announced that the Russian Federation was preparing an attack on Ukraine in April 2021. It dawned on me only by November that they would not risk their reputation in vain, and the war would indeed take place. Biden said that the attack could happen in early January 2022, Solovyov, Skobeeva, Simonyan, Kiselev actively discussed in January 2022 that Russia never came to the war. Then Biden announced a new deadline - 16.02.2022/21.02.2022/XNUMX, Solovyov, Skobeeva, Simonyan, Kiselev again laughed live that Russia again did not come to the war, right up to XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX they laughed, until it became obvious to everyone that before the war there were a matter of hours.

    Quote: Lech from Android.
    Under certain conditions, nuclear weapons will certainly be used ... no one knows in advance their future, neither we, nor the Americans, nor the Europeans.
    Otherwise, I consider it absolutely vital that Russia withdraw from START.
    The US and NATO should not know our nuclear secrets ... this will be our guarantee against an attack by the Anglo-Saxons.

    The Anglo-Saxons will not attack anyway. They are not particularly interested in Russia as an object of attack. In 1919, the situation at the front was such that Lenin did not rule out that he would have to go underground again. At that moment, all Denikin’s forces were about 70 thousand. The United States during WWI sent 3,6 million people to Europe to fight against Germany, and at the request of Kolchak and Denikin, only 6000 people were sent to Russia during the intervention, 600 times less, than against Germany. And this is at a time when the United States could seize Russia with its bare hands, but did not do so. But the United States actively helped the starving in the Volga region in 1920-21. Again, in 1952, the United States already had about 700 atomic bombs, the USSR had about 20. and no means of delivery to the USA. And even in such conditions, the United States did not attack the USSR. Why would the Anglo-Saxons now throw themselves at us?
    At the same time, I think that a nuclear war will most likely occur in the coming years, maybe the next 2-3 years
  11. Raisa_Fyodorovna
    Raisa_Fyodorovna 25 February 2023 00: 19
    -1
    Quote: Lech from Android.
    But NATO needs it ... after all, Russia will use its entire arsenal in this case ...
    quickly and as if from a cannon everything that is supposed to be and that is provided for by the plans.

    Of course, NATO needs this, but why will they indifferently watch how the Russian Federation uses nuclear weapons on them?
  12. Raisa_Fyodorovna
    Raisa_Fyodorovna 25 February 2023 00: 24
    0
    Quote from Silver99
    The United States considers it possible to keep its nuclear forces: air and medium-range missiles in close proximity to the Russian borders in Germany, Poland, Turkey ....., where the flight time is only 10 minutes, unlike ballistic missiles, where it is 30-40 minutes.

    there are no missiles in Turkey, there are only tactical nuclear weapons, aerial bombs. There are no missiles in Poland either.

    Quote from Silver99
    The Caribbean crisis erupted precisely because of the deployment of nuclear weapons in Turkey, so in order to demonstrate "uncompromising goodwill" return missiles to Cuba, not so much for the sake of destroying the United States (the Strategic Missile Forces and nuclear submarines are enough for this), but so that they would feel the ticking of the doomsday clock day.

    return to Cuba
  13. Raisa_Fyodorovna
    Raisa_Fyodorovna 25 February 2023 00: 29
    -1
    Quote: BorzRio
    If Russia had not written off Cuba's debts, it would have already gone over to the United States a long time ago. And there would be not only secret US prisons, but also military bases.

    the US military base in Cuba already exists. Where do you think the secret prison is? In Havana? At the military base in Guantanamo Bay
  14. Raisa_Fyodorovna
    Raisa_Fyodorovna 25 February 2023 00: 35
    -3
    Quote: Torvlobnor IV
    Before the coronavirus, according to the agreement, mutual inspections of nuclear arsenals were carried out. Until then everything worked out. Now there are no inspections, it seems.

    And people think it's vital! Here, look:
    Quote: Lech from Android.
    And so I consider it absolutely vital that Russia withdraw from START

    If the people are told that falling out the window is vital, the people will gladly fall out
  15. Raisa_Fyodorovna
    Raisa_Fyodorovna 25 February 2023 00: 38
    -2
    Quote: tralflot1832
    In the 70s, the United States agreed to a treaty, let's see how it is now.

    now, all the more so, we went to an agreement, it was the Russian Federation that did not agree to an agreement
  16. Igorash
    Igorash 25 February 2023 03: 25
    0
    "Furthermore, START does not take into account the nuclear capabilities of Britain and France, which, as the conflict in Ukraine showed, act with the United States as a united front against Russia."
    You listen to this b .... d ... President and you understand that what He says is often not true ... It feels like He is a Martian ...
  17. The comment was deleted.
    1. Mayan
      Mayan 27 February 2023 23: 27
      0
      .. how to comment: we don’t know more than a lot, we didn’t allow it, we know; in English, Parisian, clubs, etc. we haven’t been around for a long time, then we didn’t join; from international organizations where the deadlines ended, where they were expelled, where they themselves left ; what restrictions, tolerances, the status of the government do not know, etc, (