U.S. Congress submits bill to withdraw U.S. military from Syria

30
U.S. Congress submits bill to withdraw U.S. military from Syria

US Republican Congressman Matt Goetz submitted a draft resolution to the House of Representatives, according to which it is supposed to oblige President Joe Biden to withdraw troops from Syria.

According to the information available to the congressman, despite the absence of a corresponding sanction from the US authorities, the contingent of American troops in Syria has 900 troops.



The Republican's statement claims that the US Congress has not authorized the kinetic presence of US military personnel in Syria.

Under current US law, the status of bills affecting matters relating to the conduct of hostilities obliges members of the House of Representatives to put it to a vote within 18 days after the date of introduction.

The reason for the submission to Congress by a member of the Republican Party of a draft resolution on the withdrawal of American troops from Syria was an incident in which four members of the US Army were injured during a raid aimed at eliminating one of the leaders of the Islamic State* (*terrorist organization banned in the territory of RF).

The congressman also stressed that the slogan "America first" suggests the desire to put the citizens of their country first, and not the interests of companies that are part of the military-industrial complex.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    22 February 2023 21: 18
    Well, everything. Leaked the Kurds. It will be necessary to please the Turks in the morning recourse
    1. +13
      22 February 2023 21: 26
      Only one deputy .... just depicting noise out of the blue. But, probably, the United States would have definitely come out of there if it had not been afraid that without them and the Turks, the region would be liberated from terrorists and return to normal life.
      1. +6
        22 February 2023 22: 46
        The political noise is true. In order for them to leave the state where no one called them as troops, they do not need a congress and its decision. And since Congress, as the supreme authority over all, said no means no? Will they leave their weapons behind when they leave?
        1. +2
          23 February 2023 02: 53
          Actually, why do they even need to be in Syria?
          Steal oil!
          Would businessmen agree to stop stealing?
          They won't agree.
          No. Americans will not leave Syria voluntarily.
          And a couple of shellings a month, with virtually no casualties, is not an argument for them.
          1. +1
            23 February 2023 08: 42
            Quote: Shurik70
            Actually, why do they even need to be in Syria?
            Steal oil!

            Troops out...
            And who will steal oil if all the thieves are removed?
    2. +3
      22 February 2023 22: 12
      Well, everything. Leaked the Kurds

      how will they control Syrian oil now? Share with the Turks?
      1. 0
        22 February 2023 23: 16
        Don't think. The Turks will definitely not share oil. Kurds will be offered a guide - Moses
        1. +1
          23 February 2023 08: 47
          Quote: igorbrsv
          Don't think. The Turks will definitely not share oil. Kurds will be offered a guide - Moses

          The Jews are still offended by Moses, that for forty years he led them through the desert and led them to the only place in the Middle East where there is no oil.
    3. +2
      22 February 2023 23: 20
      Quote: igorbrsv
      Well, that’s it.

      Don't get excited. What will the Americans pass off as "shale oil" if they leave?
    4. +3
      22 February 2023 23: 29
      Well, everything. Leaked the Kurds. It will be necessary to please the Turks in the morning

      They merge all "allies". Business, nothing more...
      1. +4
        23 February 2023 00: 15
        They have no allies, only slaves and enemies.
  2. +7
    22 February 2023 21: 24
    The Republican's statement claims that the US Congress has not sanctioned kinetic presence US military personnel in Syria.

    Something new in terminology. recourse
    Maybe physical?
    1. +3
      22 February 2023 21: 28
      I think they mean - the movement, redeployment of military personnel (as a kind of kinetic movement).
      You have to look at the original statement.
      1. 0
        23 February 2023 00: 05
        this is to RIA Novosti, all of their "kinetic presence" is quoted.
    2. +3
      22 February 2023 22: 16
      Maybe physical?

      you need to ask the google translator what he meant
  3. +4
    22 February 2023 21: 31
    The reason for the submission to Congress by a member of the Republican Party of a draft resolution on the withdrawal of US troops from Syria was an incident in which four members of the US Army were injured during a raid.

    Something is not enough for everything they do there.
  4. +9
    22 February 2023 21: 37
    It would be necessary to reduce the contingent, "unknown" people with "unknown" missiles should thin out the number of personnel at American bases in Syria. Then, perhaps, the withdrawal will take place faster.
    1. +1
      22 February 2023 22: 10
      It was just the other day. They don't leave. Or maybe they just forgot about it. Or they don't want to take it. If only they didn’t have to ask for our base for evacuation. hold out
  5. +4
    22 February 2023 21: 45
    Well, what? Undercover struggle within the empire of lies. Such contingents are the financing of the US intelligence agencies and other agents of influence around the world. There is no funding, there are no foreign agents and other creatures.
  6. +11
    22 February 2023 21: 50
    Water wears away the stone. A small special operation by Iran, and now the understanding is ripening in the minds that it is necessary to go out before they start to massively bring down American soldiers.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +2
        22 February 2023 22: 16
        And even then I said that it would be necessary to shell a little and set fire to a couple of wells. But even then, our General Staff had hope that they themselves would leave ...
  7. +4
    22 February 2023 22: 07
    The effect of the global defeat of the United States has slowly gone around the world
    1. +1
      22 February 2023 22: 45
      The new Kennedy is ready to take aim...
      ...........
  8. +4
    22 February 2023 22: 30
    as always they came, shat and ran away
  9. +2
    22 February 2023 22: 51
    It's high time, good riddance.
    And they are not enough
  10. +2
    22 February 2023 23: 32
    Bh
    goes... And it comes out... It comes out great!
  11. +2
    23 February 2023 00: 18
    It would be nice if they started an interracial revolution and closed all their bases on the planet.
  12. +4
    23 February 2023 00: 48
    One Republican. It is unlikely that anything real will happen with the withdrawal of the US military from Syria.
    No accident would have happened to a Republican.
    I do not believe that there are sincere friends of Russia in the US Congress. But temporary companions are useful.
  13. +3
    23 February 2023 00: 58
    How you bring it in and take it out. They will refuse free oil for a great life.
  14. +2
    23 February 2023 04: 08
    the kinetic presence of US military personnel in Syria is not authorized.

    Is it possessing kinetic energy? But they will be able to acquire it only after being hit by an Iranian missile, and then their presence will become kinetic, and will depend on the mass of the body and the square of the speed.