The President of the United States called the suspension by Russia of the implementation of the conditions of START-3 a "big mistake"

64
The President of the United States called the suspension by Russia of the implementation of the conditions of START-3 a "big mistake"

In the West, they continue to speak out on the subject of condemning the decision of Russian President Vladimir Putin to suspend Russia's participation in the agreement with the United States on the control, reduction and limitation of strategic offensive arms (START-3).

Following representatives of the State Department and the European Union, US President Joe Biden also expressed his opinion about Moscow's freezing the implementation of the terms of the agreement. Answering a question from journalists before a meeting with NATO's Bucharest Nine, the American president called Putin's decision to suspend Russia's implementation of the START-3 conditions a "big mistake".



This agreement was signed by the presidents of the two countries in 2010 in Prague, entered into force in 2011, its validity period is ten years with the possibility of extension by decision of the parties for another five years. On January 27, 2021, the State Duma and the Federation Council of the Russian Federation ratified the agreement between Russia and the United States on the extension of START until February 5, 2026. On January 29, President Putin signed the law on the extension of START, and on February 3, the agreement entered into force

Yesterday, the Russian president, during his annual address to the Federal Assembly, announced the initiative of the Russian side to suspend participation in the agreement for a number of reasons, including non-compliance with the terms of the agreement by the United States.

Today, the State Duma, followed by the Federation Council of Russia, unanimously voted for the relevant law No. 301204-8 "On the suspension by the Russian Federation of the Treaty between the Russian Federation and the United States of America on measures to further reduce and limit strategic offensive weapons." Now the document will go to the president for signature, and after the official publication it will come into force.

It is noteworthy that this decision of the President of Russia was made after Washington unexpectedly started talking about the need to resume cooperation under the New START. Moreover, the rhetoric of the White House habitually consisted of claims that Moscow does not allow American observers to military facilities on the territory of the Russian Federation. Although the United States was the first to ban the inspection of its offensive nuclear arsenals by Russian inspectors.

This is not the first international agreement, the implementation of which is suspended or completely terminated by Russia. But every single decision of this kind is made by Moscow solely in response to unfriendly, and lately openly hostile, steps taken by former Western partners.
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    22 February 2023 18: 04
    Yes, yes, now the wild Russians will not turn a blind eye to the placement of launchers near their borders - how wrong they were!
    1. +6
      22 February 2023 18: 08
      Biden is the November 2020 American voters' walking blunder. For some reason no one is in a hurry to fix it.
      1. +6
        22 February 2023 20: 54
        If the enemies are unhappy, then everything is done correctly.
    2. -9
      22 February 2023 18: 10
      Quote from Bingo
      Yes, yes, now the wild Russians will not turn a blind eye to the placement of launchers near their borders - how wrong they were!

      Launchers of what? Is it easy to explain?
      1. -11
        22 February 2023 18: 14
        Quote: Adrey
        Launchers of what? Is it easy to explain?

        Medium range missile. They will be placed in Europe and Japan.
        It's not really clear what the answer is. It looks like another concern.
        Russia will comply with the clauses of the Treaty between the Russian and American sides of the United States on measures to further reduce and limit strategic offensive arms (START-3), regarding the number of nuclear charge carriers, the exchange of notifications will continue, Major General Yevgeny Ilyin, Deputy Head of the Main Directorate, said in the State Duma Ministry of Defense of Russia.
        1. +2
          22 February 2023 18: 18
          Quote from cold wind
          Medium range missile.

          Do they exist? At the moment, how already and allegedly placed launchers? Yes, and then the contract is different, the INF Treaty. If sclerosis serves me right, the Americans unilaterally withdrew from it 2-3 years ago. Since then, no one has forbidden us to rivet these rockets like pies! It’s just that our such systems are not visible on the foreseeable horizon (as well as American ones, by the way). request
          1. +1
            22 February 2023 18: 49
            Quote: Adrey
            Do they have any?

            Certainly. In perspective 1-2 months: Tomahawks ~2500 km, SM-6 700~1000 km


            In the future 1-2 years LRHW ~2800 km

            1. -4
              22 February 2023 19: 03
              Quote from cold wind
              Конечно.

              Yes, I am aware, but ... "Tomahawks" have nothing to do with ballistic missiles, and nothing was heard of ground launchers for them (except, of course, the universal stationary Mk 41 at missile defense stations. But this is also another missile defense treaty). Special warheads on "Tomahawks" were removed long ago and I don't remember their fate. But I don't think they are in storage. SM-6 can be used as a BRS, but officially the air defense system and about the special warheads are also silent for her.
              But with our suspension of the New START, this scenario for the United States just becomes possible and we cannot control this process in any way !!! VIVAT!!! Can d-u-r-a-k!!! laughing wassat hi
              And we apparently will create 6 new charges, 1000 Yars and Sarmats, 500 missile silos, 500 Tu-100 and Tu-160 and 95 Boreevs in 10 months?
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. -3
                22 February 2023 19: 11
                Quote: Adrey
                "Tomahawks" have nothing to do with ballistic missiles

                So I didn’t write about ballistic missiles.
                Quote: Adrey
                But with our suspension of the New START, this scenario for the United States just becomes possible and we cannot control this process!

                That's it. They can withdraw from the contract, they can stay, they can suspend. Full carte blanche for any action. We completely lose control of the situation. They have orders of magnitude more potential carriers of nuclear weapons with the ability to deliver to our territory.
                Therefore, the old man is honest and talks about a big mistake.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. -1
                  22 February 2023 19: 17
                  Quote from cold wind
                  They have orders of magnitude more potential carriers of nuclear weapons with the ability to deliver to our territory.
                  Therefore, the old man is honest and talks about a big mistake.

                  Exactly good hi
                  But you can observe the effect of this statement in our society by the "-" laughing
                  1. -5
                    22 February 2023 19: 23
                    The funny thing is that it is not at all clear that we have suspended. The number of warheads will remain unchanged, as well as carriers. Mutual inspections? So they already know where our entire arsenal is, a huge satellite constellation is watching this.
                    1. -5
                      22 February 2023 19: 26
                      Quote from cold wind
                      The funny thing is that it is not at all clear that we have suspended.

                      On this issue, I had a post on another branch, but I will not repeat here. The cons are completely overwhelmed laughing
                      It looks like just a media stuffing for the electorate with ill-conceived consequences hi
                      1. -7
                        22 February 2023 19: 37
                        Alternatively, this is all agreed with the Washington Regional Committee. Against the background of their old man, ours looks extremely pale. It was necessary to create a distracting info occasion. And so in a month another quietly resume participation in the contract. Like the Grain Deal.
                      2. -6
                        22 February 2023 23: 02
                        Quote from cold wind
                        Alternatively, this is all agreed with the Washington Regional Committee.

                        Doubtful. On controversial decisions, even without the "conspiracy theory" we can give odds to many.
              3. +2
                22 February 2023 19: 14
                Ground launchers were developed a long time ago. And they were adopted by the US Army, but the treaty eliminated them.
                1. 0
                  22 February 2023 19: 28
                  Quote: Mikhail Maslov
                  Ground launchers have been developed for a long time. And they were adopted by the US Army,but the treaty eliminated them.

                  Thanks, I'm aware. Important emphasized hi
                2. +1
                  23 February 2023 13: 50
                  Quote: Mikhail Maslov
                  the treaty eliminated them.

                  You are confusing START and INF. Like many others in the thread.
              4. 0
                22 February 2023 19: 19
                Yes, everything is fine. Everything has its time.
                https://topwar.ru/196875-istochnik-soobschil-o-razrabotke-beregovogo-raketnogo-kompleksa-pod-giperzvukovuju-raketu-cirkon.html
        2. +2
          22 February 2023 18: 39
          Well, how is the can is happy? You said yesterday that it's just a holiday in the West.

          President of the Russian Federation: I have decided to suspend our membership in the START treaty


          cold wind

          Very timely news for the US. This treaty was very difficult for them. China intends to triple its nuclear arsenal by 2035, so the United States needs to have an arsenal comparable to China and Russia combined.
          They also need to militarize space. Having superiority by orders of magnitude in the load being launched, they can make a qualitative leap forward. Thank you Musk for this.
          The United States also needs to remove restrictions on long-range / strategic bombers, in the confrontation with China they have a key role.
          In general, for the United States is extremely positive news.
          1. -2
            22 February 2023 18: 52
            Quote: AVA77
            Well, how is the can is happy? You said yesterday that it's just a holiday in the West.

            Certainly. He also says that this is a “big mistake”. I absolutely agree with him. Trump wanted not to renew the 2021 contract, Biden extended it in recent months. In fact, he helped us, but now the “hawks” have their wings unleashed. By the way, it is not at all clear what our suspension is.
            1. -1
              22 February 2023 18: 58
              Certainly. He also says that this is a “big mistake”. I absolutely agree with him. Trump wanted not to renew the 2021 contract, Biden extended it in recent months.

              So this is what happens, this is your mistake with the can. belay
              Tek it is you with a can to judge, for wrecking wassat
            2. +2
              22 February 2023 19: 03
              what is our suspension

              probably in the fact that American inspectors will not be allowed to enter nuclear weapons sites, which will make it difficult to destroy them in the event of a conflict
            3. 0
              22 February 2023 20: 34
              Quote from cold wind
              Certainly. He also says that this is a “big mistake”.
              Well, since the can says... And someone would let him say that this poses a great danger to the US intentions to do away with Russia forever?
            4. +6
              22 February 2023 22: 14
              Quote from cold wind
              By the way, it is not at all clear what our suspension is.

              Really do not understand, or just under the stupid mow? We have a START treaty with mattresses according to the US = RF formula, which did not provide for the number of nuclear charges France and Great Britain had, i.e. being within the framework of the treaty, we could in no way influence the buildup of the nuclear potential of our adversaries on NATO territory, and therefore, further stay within the framework of the treaty is obviously detrimental to Russia's security. Realizing the inferiority of the treaty, we still did not pedal this topic and adhered to its terms until the horse-headed representatives of NATO announced their goal of military defeat of Russia and its dismemberment, which was the impetus for the suspension of the treaty. However, one must understand that there is nothing more long-term than a temporary one, and the resumption of START is impossible a priori, at least until the finalization of the results of the new world order. In fairness, it should be noted that the TOT treaty also did not provide for any regulation of the number of nuclear weapons in China, and probably the mattresses tried to put pressure on Russia in order to influence Beijing in terms of joining the preparation of a new treaty in which the PRC will be presented as one of the parties to the treaty limited by obligations in terms of the development of the nuclear program and delivery vehicles. China vs. We went out. The mattresses are frowning. they understand that without the inclusion of nuclear European dandruff arsenals in the new treaty, no signing will take place at all, and therefore their trump card is marked and no one else will believe their word. So they lament, they say everything was so beautiful, but here the GDP took and ruined everything.
              1. +2
                23 February 2023 14: 05
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                China and probably the mattresses tried to put pressure on Russia in order to influence Beijing in terms of joining the preparation of a new treaty in which the PRC will be presented as one of the parties to the treaty with limited obligations

                You, dear friend, are confusing something. The United States proposed to conclude a similar treaty with China. The idea that the Russian leadership can have a say in this matter is somehow too ridiculous.
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                Realizing the inferiority of the contract, we still did not pedal this topic and adhered to it

                Obviously, with the collapse of the USSR, all the diplomatic waste paper from the Cold War had to go to the trash. But the US Democratic Party is so accustomed to playing along with the Communists that they tried to alcoholize, so to speak, these relics as a diplomatic attraction.

                Fortunately, neither Putin nor the Republicans suffered from such troubles, and one by one they canceled all this nonsense. Bush canceled missile defense, then Putin CFE, then Trump the INF, and now Putin is canceling START. Now, nothing (except their own cockroaches) prevents the American military from using its overwhelming economic, scientific and technical superiority in the most reasonable way, without regard to treaties signed by completely different countries in completely different realities. To what extent the Americans will be able and willing to use these opportunities, we will see over time. So far, the performance is mediocre, but the Americans always harness slowly.
          2. 0
            22 February 2023 18: 54
            The can doesn’t care. The old grandfather doesn’t care for him. The main thing for him is to somehow hobble the remaining 2 years of his presidency. And at least the grass doesn’t grow there.
          3. +1
            22 February 2023 18: 54
            Quote: AVA77
            Well, how is the can is happy?
            After flying from the ladder to the ground in Warsaw, he seemed to be born again. Why should he be sad. When I saw him with a bruise on his forehead, at first I decided that it was Zelensky who kissed him on the forehead goodbye, and that’s how the Polish land met him. Maybe she doesn't want a war.
            1. -1
              22 February 2023 20: 08
              This is how he landed, literally. laughing
              Failure of systems and entry into forced. Yes


          4. 0
            22 February 2023 20: 09
            Quote: AVA77
            Well, how is the can is happy?
            As an enlightened Hindu with a slight smile of hope and joy peers into the bosom of eternity (see the photo above).
  2. +1
    22 February 2023 18: 06
    The "big mistake" even earlier was the creation of the United States, and the whole world has been hiccuping from this mistake for more than 200 years.
    1. 0
      22 February 2023 18: 21
      Quote: credo
      The "big mistake" even earlier was the creation of the United States

      At VO, 5 years ago, they discussed the actions of the United States. And the conclusions were correct - the United States is pushing the Russian Federation into the arms of China, and this will lead to the transformation of the United States into a third world country. US hegemony is over. hi
      1. 0
        23 February 2023 13: 56
        Quote: fif21
        the conclusions were correct - the United States is pushing the Russian Federation into the arms of China, and this will lead to the transformation of the United States into a third world country

        And how will the appearance of yet another province in the PRC, economically backward by Chinese standards and very problematic in all aspects, somehow change the position of the United States?
        1. 0
          24 February 2023 13: 06
          Quote: Negro
          And how will the appearance of yet another province in the PRC, economically backward by Chinese standards and very problematic in all aspects, somehow change the position of the United States?
          Not "another province", but a "roof" that allows China to allow greater freedom in political maneuvers with Taiwan. Without Russia, China could quickly be strangled by military-political methods, and Russia without China could be strangled economically. Did you come to geopolitics from BLM?
  3. +4
    22 February 2023 18: 07
    The President of the United States called the suspension by Russia of the implementation of the conditions of START-3 a "big mistake"
    It is pointless to cooperate or argue with a cheater who does not recognize any rules other than his own, beneficial only to him.
  4. ASM
    0
    22 February 2023 18: 10
    Well, what else can a prompter in an earpiece say to him? Take care of your grandfather with dementia, he gets confused even in 3 bushes.
    1. +1
      22 February 2023 18: 18
      He is destined to be a hero!
      If he glued flippers in Ukraine - he died for "democracy", if he didn't glue them together - he was not afraid of meeting under bombs .... Win-win option - now he is nominated for the "peace" award ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    2. 0
      22 February 2023 18: 36
      Quote from A.S.M.
      Take care of your grandfather with dementia, he gets confused even in 3 bushes.

      But 4 times repeated "joke aside". It is interesting that at the same time he "seeed"
      1. 0
        22 February 2023 19: 01
        Quote: Egoza
        Quote from A.S.M.
        Take care of your grandfather with dementia, he gets confused even in 3 bushes.

        But 4 times repeated "joke aside". It is interesting that at the same time he "seeed"

        Elena prYuvet! One out of two. Or a toilet bowl or toilet type "toilet". wink
      2. -1
        22 February 2023 19: 30
        Quote: Egoza
        Quote from A.S.M.
        Take care of your grandfather with dementia, he gets confused even in 3 bushes.

        But 4 times repeated "joke aside". It is interesting that at the same time he "seeed"
        New urological pad: afraid to laugh.
  5. +4
    22 February 2023 18: 23
    How many treaties did the Amerzas just come out of? Following their logic, there is a mistake on the error ....
    1. +1
      22 February 2023 18: 39
      Quote: Russia
      Following their logic, there is a mistake on the error ....

      This is not a "mistake", but when Russia comes out, then it is already a "mistake".
      Although Chumaded himself "error 404".
      1. +2
        22 February 2023 18: 44
        Oh yes... it's different... wassat how could I remember belay , there is no logic at all ... Yes
  6. +6
    22 February 2023 18: 32
    The US President called Putin's decision to suspend Russia's implementation of the START-3 conditions a "big mistake".

    The administration of the incumbent US President Donald Trump is not going to renew the current Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (START, START-3) in its current form, said the special representative of the US President for arms control, Marshall Billingsley. 24.12.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX

    When Trump announced his withdrawal from this treaty, it was good. When Putin is bad. "Partners" from Washington are already confused about what is good and what is bad. fool
    1. 0
      22 February 2023 18: 39
      Quote: Amateur
      "Partners" from Washington are already confused about what is good and what is bad.

      They don't confuse anything. Everything that the United States does is good, everyone else should be silent in a rag. (((Maybe we can get out of all these contracts right away?
    2. +1
      22 February 2023 19: 08
      Quote: Amateur
      "Partners" from Washington are already confused about what is good and what is bad.

      It’s somehow ... what’s good, what’s bad ... from an interview of the same in 2020 - Special Representative of the US President for Arms Control Marshall Billingsley
      We have made it clear to our Russian colleagues that what China is doing is fundamentally different from what the UK and France are doing.... We believe it is necessary to specifically mention China. Our position is that, speaking of a future treaty, we should have in mind a trilateral treaty ... Therefore, it is obvious that we are not considering a future treaty involving, for example, India, Pakistan or North Korea (countries that unofficially possess nuclear weapons .- "b"). It will simply become non-working: the more participants, the more negotiations need to be held. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4499882

      it’s good for them when the “trilateral” + China, while France and the UK are different
      then the Chinese - "China has no intentions of joining the so-called trilateral arms control talks with Russia and the United States. This position is both clear and consistent" Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/9255351
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. 0
    22 February 2023 18: 38
    The US President called Putin's decision to suspend Russia's implementation of the START-3 conditions a "big mistake".

    Here Chumaded, skidded again. And when you were a mad clown, armed HIMARS, you did not think that you were making a "big mistake". Should have thought earlier.
  9. -1
    22 February 2023 18: 39
    The jug is a big mistake of nature and the obstetrician.
  10. 0
    22 February 2023 18: 50
    What they fought for and ran into and there’s nothing to build innocent eyes here ... all the more so since mattress covers from bilateral agreements come out at once (the ABM treaty) as an example) the exit is a timely and archaic step
  11. +2
    22 February 2023 18: 51
    The mistake of the USA is their presidents. Here are the statistics for you:

    1945 - a nuclear attack on Japan.
    1946 - punitive operations in Yugoslavia.
    1946-1949 - the bombing of China.
    1947-1948 - recolonization of Vietnam, genocide.
    1947-1949 - military operations in Greece.
    1948-1953 - military operations in the Philippines.
    1948 - military coup in Peru.
    1948 - military coup in Nicaragua.
    1948 - A military coup in Costa Rica.
    1949-1953 - attempts to overthrow the government in Albania.
    1950 - Punitive Operations in Puerto Rico.
    1950-1953 - intervention in Korea.
    1951 - military assistance to Chinese rebels.
    1953-1964 - power special operations in British Guyana.
    1953 - the overthrow of Mossadyk, who received in the referendum 99.9% of the vote.
    1953 - Forced Deportation of Inuit (Greenland).
    1954 - Overthrow of the government in Guatemala: Invasion codenamed Operation PBSUCCESS and coup d'état by CIA mercenaries against President Jacobo Árbenz, who was about to carry out a deep land reform and nationalize the lands of the United Fruit Company. After the overthrow of Arbenz, four decades of military terror and civil war begin, in which about 140 thousand people die. A truce in the civil war is signed only in 1996
    1954 - Iran: The CIA and British intelligence in the course of Operation Ajax organize the overthrow of Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh. Subsequently, Iran during the reign of Mohammed Reza Pahlavi becomes the most important ally of the United States in the Middle East.
    1956 - the beginning of military assistance to Tibetan rebels in the fight against China.
    1957-1958 is an attempt to overthrow the government in Indonesia.
    1958 - Occupation of Lebanon: US intervenes in the Lebanon Crisis
    1958 - The bombing of Indonesia.
    1958 - China: In the confrontation between the PRC and Taiwan over the islands of Kinmen and Matsu, the United States sends warships and marines to support Taiwan
    1959 - the introduction of troops in Laos.
    1959 - punitive operations in Haiti.
    1960 - military operations in Ecuador.
    1960 - invasion of Guatemala.
    1960 - Support for a military coup in El Salvador.
    1960-1965 - interference in the internal affairs of the Congo. Mobutu support.
    1961-1964 - a military coup in Brazil.
    1961 - terrorist war against Cuba with the use of bacteriological weapons. A group of US-backed Cuban militants conduct an unsuccessful operation in the Bay of Pigs.
    1962 - Cuba: During the Caribbean Crisis, the island is subject to a total blockade.
    1962 - punitive operations in Guatemala.
    1963-1966 - coup d'état and punitive operations in the Dominican Republic.
    1964 is a punitive operation in Panama.
    1964 - support for the coup in Brazil.
    1964-1974 - interference in the internal affairs of Greece.
    1964 - Laos: American aircraft and ground troops conduct a military operation in northeastern Laos. After many years of fighting, the military solution is recognized as futile and the American intervention troops leave the country in 1973.
    1964-1975 Aggression against Vietnam: US massively intervenes in the Vietnam War. During the hostilities in the country are up to 550 thousand US soldiers. The withdrawal of troops is carried out only in 1975.
    1965 - coup in Indonesia, genocide.
    1965 - Kazhbodzha: The United States bombards the border areas along the Vietnamese border. Thus, Cambodia was drawn into the Vietnam War.
    1966 - intervention in Guatemala.
    1967 - support for the coup and the subsequent fascist regime in Greece.
    1968 - the hunt for Che Guevara in Bolivia.
    1971-1973 - the bombing of Laos.
    1971 - American military assistance during the coup in Bolivia.
    1972 - the introduction of troops in Nicaragua.
    1973 - the coup in Chile.
    1973 - Terror in Uruguay.
    1974 - support for Mobotu mode in Zaire.
    1974 - preparation of aggression in Portugal.
    1974 is an attempted coup in Cyprus.
    1975 - the occupation of Western Sahara, the introduction of troops in Morocco.
    1975 - Intervention in Australia's internal affairs.
    1975 - attack on Cambodia.
    1975-1989 - support for the genocide in East Timor.
    1978 - military assistance to the dictator, financing of the genocide.
    1979 - support for the cannibal Bokasa.
    1979 - military assistance to the rebels of Yemen.
    1980-1992 - military presence in El Salvador, special operations, genocide.
    1980-1990 - military assistance to Iraq. A million dead in ten years.
    1980 - support and financing of the Khmer Rouge.
    1980 - Operation Gladio in Italy, 86 victims.
    1980 is a punitive operation in South Korea.
    1980 - Iran: Operation Eagle Claw to free American hostages at the American embassy in Tehran fails
    1981 is an attempted coup in Zambia.
    1981 - military pressure on Libya, two Libyan aircraft shot down.
    1981-1990 - support for contra, terrorism, genocide.
    1982 - interference in the internal affairs of Suriname.
    1982-1983 - attack on Lebanon.
    1982 - Genocide Support in Guatemala.
    1983 - Iran/Iraq: The United States provides military support to Iran in the Iran-Iraq war in exchange for the release of American hostages in Tehran. At the same time, the United States is also supplying the Iraqi side with weapons.
    1983 - Lebanon: As part of their international coalition, the United States intervenes in the Lebanese Civil War. As a result of a series of terrorist attacks, the international coalition leaves Lebanon.
    1983 - intervention in Grenada: As a result of a coup d'état, a new government comes to power, focusing on the Soviet Union. This leads to the US invasion of Grenada
    1983 - Interventions in the internal affairs of Angola.
    1984 - Two Iranian aircraft shot down.
    1984 - mining of the bays of Nicaragua.
    1985 - financing of the genocide in Chad.
    1986 - attack on Libya.
    1986-1987 - attack on an Iranian ship in international waters, the destruction of the Iranian oil platform.
    1986 - funding and military support for social terror, the seizure of natural resources.
    1986 - Libya: As an act of retaliation for Libyan terrorist acts, the United States bombs targets in Tripoli and Benghazi (Operation El Dorado Canyon)
    1987-1988 - participation in the Iraq war against Iran, the use of chemical weapons.
    1988 - financing of terror and genocide in Turkey.
    1988 - the explosion of a passenger plane "Pan American" over Scotland. Found guilty in 2003. The US guided missile cruiser USS Vincennes (CG-49) shoots down an Iran Air passenger plane over the Strait of Hormuz, killing 290 people. According to the American side, it was impossible for their military to distinguish between an Iranian passenger plane and a military one and to establish contact with the pilots. At the same time, the American cruiser was in the territorial waters of Iran as part of Operation Earnest Will. The captain of the USS Vincennes was awarded the award.
    1988 - the invasion of Honduras.
    1988 - Destruction of an Iranian passenger plane.
    1989 - intervention in Panama.
    1989 - Two Libyan aircraft shot down.
    1989 - bombing in the Philippines.
    1989 is a punitive operation in the Virgin Islands.
    1990 - Genocide in Guatemala.
    1990 - the naval blockade of Iraq.
    1990 - financing of the Bulgarian opposition ($ 1,5 million)
    1991 - aggression against Iraq.
    1991 - Kuwait bombing.
    1992-1994 - the occupation of Somalia.
    1992 - genocide and terror in the seizure of the natural wealth of Angola (650.000 people destroyed).
    1993-1995 - the bombing of Bosnia.
    1994-1996 - terror against Iraq.
    1994 is the genocide in Rwanda (about 800 000 people).
    1995 - bombing of Croatia.
    1998 - destruction by a missile strike of a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan.
    1998 - bombing of Iraq.
    1999 - aggression against Yugoslavia.
    2001 - the invasion of Afghanistan.
    2002 - the entry of troops into the Philippines.

    2003 - action in Liberia.
    2003 - clashes with Syrian border guards.
    2003 - Iraq: Iraqi War, which also involves a number of American allies. After the overthrow of the regime of Saddam Hussein, a multi-year occupation begins, characterized by a high level of violence in the country, which, according to various sources, cost the lives of up to 655 Iraqis.
    2004 - Somalia: US air strikes on Islamists, active support of Somali government forces in the civil war
    2004 - the entry of troops into Haiti.
    2004 - Coup attempt in Equatorial Guinea.
    2008 - Invasion of Pakistan.
    2008 - War in South Ossetia
    2011 - War in Libya: Air strikes and rocket attacks on the country as part of the intervention in Libya. The result was the overthrow and assassination of head of state Muammar Gaddafi
    2013 - 2017 - War in Syria: the US and its allies began to bomb the positions of the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq
    2014 - War in Ukraine
    2015 - Yemen: US missile strikes on the positions of the Yemeni rebels - the Houthis and active support for the intervention of Saudi Arabia and its allies in Yemen
    1. Des
      0
      22 February 2023 19: 29
      And after all, there were quite enough funds, people and weapons for all this.
      1. 0
        23 February 2023 14: 10
        Quote: Des
        for all this, there were quite enough funds, people and weapons.

        The main thing was enough sewing in the ass. Everything does not calm down, even surprisingly.
    2. 0
      23 February 2023 14: 09
      Quote: Alex20042004
      Here are the statistics for you:

      )))
      Most of them lied, but yes, there is something to remember.

      What is your remark? Jealous?
  12. HAM
    0
    22 February 2023 18: 52
    What's on Bidon's forehead? Who instructed him schelbanov? So grandfather suffered ....
    1. -1
      22 February 2023 19: 41
      Quote: HAM
      What's on Bidon's forehead?
      This is the kiss of fate (details left above).
  13. +7
    22 February 2023 18: 56
    It was a big mistake to conclude them, being a slave ..
  14. +1
    22 February 2023 19: 01
    Only our good kick in the ass can cool their hot head.
  15. 0
    22 February 2023 19: 03
    Today I drank a lot for joy .. That Russia continues its course towards confrontation! Let's break through the men and the devils are not brothers to us.
    soldier
    PS I was very afraid that again there would be "partners" .. Well, thank God, the goals and enemies are certain drinks
  16. -2
    22 February 2023 19: 06
    And what else can grandfather can say besides concern and scratch his turnips. I am his nuclear arsenal being eaten up by cockroaches and rust.
  17. -2
    22 February 2023 19: 11
    Quote from Orange Bigg
    Biden is a walking mistake of American voters

    Badly walking and bad-speaking "Big mistake", as the ex -
    California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in the famous movie.
    It is a pity that the laws of the United States did not allow him to become president.
  18. +1
    23 February 2023 01: 24
    In Soviet times, it was constantly emphasized that without an ABM treaty, START treaties are meaningless.
  19. +1
    23 February 2023 13: 02
    And what is the point of suspending START-3 if the number of ready launch vehicles is not increasing?
  20. 0
    23 February 2023 13: 14
    If the puppeteers wrote to the grandfather a text about a big mistake, then we did everything right. After the West enters into a proxy war with Russia, which is taking place on the territory of shareware, all previously reached agreements lose their meaning. It turns out - here we are fighting with the hands of shareware, but here (where it is beneficial for us) we are cooperating with you and kindly adhere to the agreements.
  21. 0
    23 February 2023 13: 52
    They talked about our mistake - withdrawing from the treaty on short and medium-range missiles.
  22. 0
    24 February 2023 00: 26
    The enemy already bypassed the levels in terms of the number of warheads with the help of "return potential". Levels in terms of the number of carriers do not bother him at all yet due to the degradation of the carrier fleet. But their inspections of our facilities greatly interfered with our production and deployment of systems, as they say, "on new physical principles." That's all.