Peskov spoke about the attitude of the President of Russia to the Minsk agreements

23
Peskov spoke about the attitude of the President of Russia to the Minsk agreements

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov spoke about the attitude of Russian President Vladimir Putin to the Minsk agreements. According to him, the head of the Russian state did everything possible to fulfill them.

Peskov mentioned this during his interview for the TASS news agency.

He stated that Putin did a lot to implement the agreements signed in Minsk, unlike the leaders of other guarantor countries - Germany and France. According to Peskov, only Russia tried to force the Ukrainian authorities to stop the aggression against Donbass and comply with the provisions of the document they signed.

At the same time, the head of the Kremlin press service, in response to a corresponding question from a correspondent, noted that the leadership of the Russian Federation had never before published transcripts of the Normandy Four meetings and did not intend to do so in the future. And the fact that the negotiation process seemed to be taken seriously only in Moscow was later publicly acknowledged by Poroshenko, Merkel, and Hollande. Each of them mentioned that Kyiv needed the document signed in Minsk in order to calmly and slowly prepare for a future military conflict with Russia.

Speaking about the prospects for further relations between Moscow and Washington, Peskov said that no contacts were planned between the presidents of the two countries in the near future. And according to the head of the Kremlin press service, the White House learned about the suspension of Russia's participation in the Treaty on the Reduction of Strategic Offensive Arms from Putin's Address to the Federal Assembly.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    22 February 2023 13: 08
    Why, now, after a fight, they don’t wave their fists.
    1. +7
      22 February 2023 13: 12
      Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov spoke about the attitude of Russian President Vladimir Putin to the Minsk agreements. According to him, the head of the Russian state did everything possible to fulfill them.


      Yes, at least do it here, at least don’t do it, but if both Ukraine and the West did not initially plan to fulfill them, then these agreements were initially a screen behind which the real process of preparing for war was going on, zilch. It is surprising why this came as a surprise to us and why we so believed in the honesty and integrity of the West?
    2. -2
      22 February 2023 13: 23
      Quote: Alien From
      Why, now, after a fight, they don’t wave their fists.

      You are not right. This should go down as a red line in the history of the Ukrainian crisis. From its beginning in 1991 to the end of the SVO. Already now it is necessary to speak loudly, to the whole world, about this. Otherwise, a little time will pass and the Western media will distort everything in the story of the Minsk agreements.
      1. +7
        22 February 2023 13: 28
        The Western media will distort everything in the story of the Minsk agreements in any case. What loudly, what not loudly declare. Or do you doubt it?
  2. +16
    22 February 2023 13: 11
    Weird question.
    How can a sucker relate to what he was bred on? ..
    Of course he wants to try again!
    Hoping he's smart now.
  3. +11
    22 February 2023 13: 11
    The Minsk agreements are a crime against the Russian people.
    According to them, they criminally tried to shove the Russian people of Donbass against their will into the fascist Ukraine!
    And Putin could not help knowing this, he agreed to voluntarily be an accomplice in this crime.
    And now he pretends to be a simpleton that he was allegedly "deceived"
    1. +15
      22 February 2023 13: 27
      The Minsk agreements are a crime against the Russian people.
      Entirely and completely agree.
    2. AAK
      +8
      22 February 2023 14: 33
      The head of state - in the past, a career intelligence officer-counterintelligence officer, who, in addition to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, also has a bunch of intelligence organizations subordinate, and suddenly he is deceived like a naive high school student by Lieutenant Rzhevsky?!!! A very amusing kunshtuk, gentlemen!
    3. +3
      22 February 2023 19: 02
      Quote from DefenderofTruth
      And Putin could not help but know this, he agreed to voluntarily be an accomplice in this

      So Putin himself proposed the Minsk agreements. Moreover, for many years he argued that there was no alternative to the Minsk agreements!
    4. 0
      23 February 2023 14: 52
      There were no such points, there were reverse points. The bottom line is that one side was ordered to stop shelling cities and recognize the independence of individual territories, but it continued shelling in the manner of, "what are you going to do to us?". Our leadership has done it, I hope it will someday finish it at such a pace. However, as for me, the difference between Kolomoisky and Sechin is not particularly great.
  4. +10
    22 February 2023 13: 12
    Lord, yes, Merkel and Hollande have already OPENLY informed why they signed and that they were not going to do ANYTHING. Why now remember this one-sided farce.
  5. +11
    22 February 2023 13: 12
    the negotiation process seemed to be taken seriously only in Moscow
  6. +12
    22 February 2023 13: 12
    I have a different question .... can someone name at least one agreement between Russia and the West, which the latter, if it would be beneficial for him, would simply not throw it away as an unnecessary piece of paper?
    I can't remember this.
    Then why do we jump on the same rake every time?
    Deceived once - shame on them.
    Deceived in the second - shame on us!
    Deceived one hundred and first - well, who are we a doctor!
    And again - grain agreements, the exchange of Azov people, etc.
  7. +7
    22 February 2023 13: 19
    Without publishing the transcripts of the Normandy Four meetings, there is nothing to mention about this.
    Years later, to broadcast that the presidential administration tried, others did not try, but you, the electorate, cannot read such documents - this immediately arouses unhealthy interest.
    Maybe they were originally going to cut Ukraine, but could not agree?
    I completely agree that publicity can greatly harm diplomacy.
    So, I repeat, do not mention those discussions, the transcripts of which are not ready to be published.
    AP is not journalists.
    No need to wave an opaque bag, claiming that it contains the cleanest underwear.
    1. 0
      22 February 2023 13: 40
      Quote from Fangaro
      Without publishing the transcripts of the Normandy Four meetings, there is nothing to mention about this.

      Transcripts are available from each of the parties to the negotiations.
      When it suits them, the Westerners will publish it.
  8. +8
    22 February 2023 13: 23
    Quote: Murmur 55
    Lord, yes, Merkel and Hollande have already OPENLY informed why they signed and that they were not going to do ANYTHING.

    Such examples are countless.
    One gets the impression that our leaders are walking with their eyes closed across the field, where the rake is scattered.


    Shameful Minsk, grain deal, open skies, etc., where else has the cunning West not deceived our leaders?

    While people in the Donbas were dying under the blows of the ukrovermacht, everyone dreamed of Minsk. Really it was necessary to drool for so many years.
    Yes, one sight of Zelensky, at a joint briefing with Putin, is enough to understand that Ukraine will not fulfill the Minsk dreams under any circumstances.
  9. +6
    22 February 2023 13: 28
    Well, okay, I would believe in agreements, but smart people should be at the head of the state?!
    No one is going to retire there on their own? They pulled us up to the very tonsils and said it to our faces.
    Maybe enough to regale on the Lavra?
  10. +7
    22 February 2023 13: 39
    The Minsk format was not offered as a guarantor by chance? In fact, the desire to return Donbass back to Ukraine and freeze the conflict there. Who understood what these negotiations promise already in 2014 said that this was a respite for the Armed Forces, when real problems and the loss of more territories loomed in them. Apparently, we thought that it was possible to negotiate with the West and make peace as is.
    Well, in general, do not forget that then there was a legitimate president Yanukovych and his paper about the introduction of Russian troops to help disperse the Maidan.
  11. +5
    22 February 2023 14: 32
    I am not a politician and I have never visited MGIMO ....
    But it seems to me that all the pieces of paper signed with the "partners" have the right place in the latrine ...

  12. +4
    22 February 2023 15: 17
    I do not think that Putin did not know and for 8 years did not guess that neither Ukraine nor the West would comply with the Minsk agreements. It was obvious to all adequate people. If the West really wanted this, it would force Ukraine to do it. He had all the tools for this. The Ukrainian authorities are completely dependent on the West. Yes, after all, Putin has no foreign intelligence, and he was probably aware of everything. It seems that Putin simply did not really need the Donbas. Yes, and with the "partners" did not want to finally quarrel. Maybe he was not sure about his army. One way or another, he did not do what he should have done, namely, in 2014, after the Crimea, deal with the rest of Ukraine. He then did not dare and did not complete the work he had begun. And unfinished business always comes back and goes sideways. In 2015, this could still be done after Debaltseve, but even then the moment was lost. There was no will, no determination, no strategic thinking. Everything was left to the mercy of fate and where it will endure. And here it is. For 8 years Bandera, with the help of the West, have been preparing for war with us. They trained their army in the Dombas and Luhansk regions, armed, trained, zombified and brainwashed their population, transferred their military-industrial complex to a military footing. And we watched it nonchalantly and laughed arrogantly. Carrying out magnificent parades, exhibitions of weapons, ostentatious tank beatathlons and exercises. How are we a great nuclear power and that there is some kind of Ukraine against us. If anything, we will easily deprive it of statehood and put it in its place. And, as always, when it came to a head, they weren't ready for it.
    1. 0
      22 February 2023 21: 22
      wladimirjankov, dombas is a place where they play the dombra... And when you have learned to solve quadratic equations, this does not mean that you know mathematics. Quit taxiing and harness yourself to the Leaders of Russia contest.
  13. 0
    23 February 2023 22: 27
    Well mustachioed burn! Sometimes you just listen and think Zelensky is no match
  14. 0
    23 February 2023 22: 36
    Speaking about the prospects for further relations between Moscow and Washington, Peskov said that no contacts were planned between the presidents of the two countries in the near future.
    And that doesn't seem to be necessary. There is Chubais, who is behind the cordon with special powers, which he was given by the guarantor even earlier, before the start of the NWO. There is Abramovich, in the end, there is the boyar Naryshkin, who periodically meets with Burns ... . Your deeds are wonderful - the creator. They are Hymers, and a bunch of other iron ukroreyhu, and we are joint crews into space, and meetings of the heads of intelligence! For what, and with whom are we fighting, citizens? Or you can do it this way - while our guys are fighting, at the same time, some people, instead of congratulating the fighters on the front line, perform at shows that are inappropriate at such a time, call for protecting the Motherland, being together, while doing some actions that in the old days could be qualified at least as wrecking and sabotage, and at most as treason and betrayal .... sad