American edition: NATO is developing a plan in case of participation in several military conflicts at once

NATO is developing a new plan in case the countries of the alliance participate in several military conflicts at once, including on the territory of other countries, so to speak, outside the "zone of responsibility" of the bloc. It is reported by Bloomberg.

According to the news agency, the alliance is preparing a new secret agreement that will contain plans for possible actions of NATO countries in the event of several military conflicts at once, providing for the application of article 5 of the collective defense charter, including when hostilities are conducted on a territory that is not " "zone of responsibility" of the block, i.e. on the territory of countries that are not members of the alliance.

The signing of the agreement should take place during the ministerial meeting, which started today in Brussels and will last on February 14-15. In the future, on the basis of a common document, each country of the alliance will receive more detailed requirements specially developed for it.

The publication notes that although the plan is secret, they still managed to find out the general provisions. Thus, within the framework of the document, NATO member countries will be asked to increase injections and redirect funds to the most important sectors of defense, which will help with collective defense. We are talking about building up armored forces, air defense and missile defense systems, artillery, and so on.

Most likely, the plan was drawn up taking into account the study of hostilities in Ukraine. It's no secret that NATO is closely studying the tactics and strategy of Russian troops, as well as the characteristics of Russian weapons used during the special operation. At the same time, the alliance is testing its own combat systems in real conditions. In general, the North Atlantic bloc, led by the United States, is preparing for a war where the enemy will be Russia, and possibly China.

Comments

[Magellan]

I once imagined a scenario where at the same time "all of their own were taken apart": 1) Russia and China against NATO, 2) Two Koreas against each other, 3) India against Pakistan, 4) Israel against Islamic countries. It would seem nonsense, but who knows ...

[Prisoner]

The United States itself will not survive one war. Not like on two fronts. This trash can was not created for such serious cases.

[dmi.pris1]

No, they will pull one war. An example from history, how they were able to quickly organize the production of military products, starting in 1940. Moreover, in the 30s, their military production was very limited. to all NATO, that's for sure.

[Sarboz]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

No, they will pull one war. An example from history is how they were able to quickly organize the production of military products, starting in 1940.

In the 1940s, they did not wage war on their territory. Otherwise, they cannot and cannot. This is their "secret" advantage. Therefore, even now they sit out to the last, if only they themselves do not get into conflict with us or with China.

[boni592807]

Sarboz (Oleg ZOV). Today, 12:58. NEW - "...they did not wage war on their territory. Otherwise, they cannot and cannot. This is their "secret" advantage. Therefore, even now they sit out to the last, if only they themselves do not get into a conflict ... "

Why should they fight for themselves рlike greed. meanness has disappeared somewhere!?
And the sworn "partners" have always been distinguished by the ability to use THIS. Etc. Greater Russia (RI. USSR. and in the "new" Russian history they quite successfully "steered" .....
That starts. about what. has been said many times - The question is posed hard - What is more important for drivers in the Russian Federation(example - construction, etc.) loot from guests. or rather, already firmly "standing" with billions of income and successfully populating the Russian Federation and have not been law-abiding and not grateful for a long time - from the "new Russians" with their families with the roof of diasporas (foreign Legion) to essentially bandit illegal immigrants... or the state security of the Russian Federation and its indigenous peoples.?
Why does the US have a lot of militants - indicated -60.
"Down and Out trouble started!"
Both in the CIS countries and in the Russian Federation itself, "BAZA" is already quite self- 10 million guest . base - "MIGRANTS IN RUSSIA, COUNTERED - WERE TEARING .."- HTTPS://TSARGRAD.TV/NEWS/MIGRANTY-V-ROSSII-POSCHITALI-PROSLEZILIS-KTO-HOCHET-ZAMENIT-RUSSKIH-GOSTJAMI_718484..."... To begin with, let's count. Let's look at the dynamics of migration processes in the country. From January to November last year, almost 15,5 million foreign citizens were registered for migration - for the most part they are citizens of the CIS ... For comparison: for the whole last year - less than 13,4 million people, for the year before last - 9,8 million Yes, if we talk about 2020, we can recall covid restrictions. But nonetheless.... And how long was before THAT!? ... " .. As they say - who knows how to FOLD at least a column - Have fun.
Russophobia in the former republics of the USSR was cultivated as a mimimum even at the end of the USSR. Yes wishing from THEM participated. both in ISIS and in other NATO operations. About US biolaboratories - it's like a matter of course
...Many who once arrived as a guest worker in the Russian Federation. went from HER to ISIS. Who has not forgotten the so-called. "gang" GTA!?
They called themselves "jamaat" (a group of Muslims studying Islam - Ed) and invented a scheme for their atrocities themselves. Back in 2011, the ringleader was recruited into radical Islamists, after which he went to Syria and returned to Russia. Found like-minded people. And in fact created a terrorist group that operated in several regions. Most often, on the M 4 Don highway. ..Murder and robbery served as a kind of training for members of the gang. They were all supposed to be potential ISIS fighters (an organization banned in Russia) ... The criminal "GTA gang" appeared in the Moscow region in 2012. A native of Kyrgyzstan, Ibaidullo Subkhanov, who became the leader of the group and subsequently killed during arrest, took in his ranks natives of Central Asia (mainly Kyrgyz and Tajiks). Like thousands of their countrymen, they all came to Moscow to work. And in order not to attract attention, they really worked: someone was a loader, someone was at a construction site, someone was a watchman. - https://www.kp.ru/daily/26712/3737676/

And not only them. there were many in ISIS from the indigenous peoples of the Russian Federation
(April 18, 2021, 21:47
"How Russians fell into the network of banned ISIS: revelations of former militants and their wives"- https://www.1tv.ru/news/2021-04-18/405094-kak_rossiyane_popadali_v_seti_zapreschennoy_igil_otkroveniya_byvshih_boevikov_i_ih_zhen)
including Russian neophytes. took part incl. in ISIS.

That. the message of the SVR of Russia is reminded. that the long-standing developments of the "partners" are beginning to unwind:

The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service reported -
..."...According to credible data received by the Foreign Intelligence Service, the US military is actively recruiting militants from jihadist groups affiliated with the Islamic State * and Al-Qaeda * to carry out terrorist attacks in Russia and in the CIS countries, ..."
When recruiting priority was given to people from the Central Asian countries, as well as the regions of the North Caucasus. (immigrants from the territory of the countries of the former USSR and
including RF)Thugs with combat experience were sent to the American base at Al-Tanf in Syria. There they undergo an accelerated training course. -https://tsargrad.tv/news/ssha-prokololis-na-boevikah-protiv-rossii-gotovjat-seriju-teraktov_723541

The training program includes:
- production and use of IEDs (improvised explosive devices),
- methods of conducting sabotage and subversive activities.

Particular attention is paid to the planning of attacks on well-protected objects, including foreign diplomatic missions,...
That. "managers" and "coordinators" will soon be. There are "base" and "sleeping" cells in the Russian Federation ...
What are we waiting for:
- when they will "provide" a continuous cycle for the "shock builder" of Russia.
- and from the mere criminality of the "foreign legion" he, under the "control" of the United States and NATO, will move to the Russian Federation to that. what went wrong in the Caucasus?
А THIS is just one of the very real areas of "work" of the USA and England with otherugly "partners". those.
- Transnistria(a huge warehouse of weapons and b\n, which is INTERESTING).
- Ours in Syria
- Ours in Armenia...
R.S. Judging by the Nord Streams, the United States has many options and the ones listed are the most PAINFUL and can be done by ANOTHER HANDS ... The "red lines" of the Russian Federation allow this quite safely. It would be nice - bye! Hope . what who decides in the Russian Federation is aware of:
- If your enemy calms down, do not give him a break. If your forces are united, separate them. Attack him where he is not ready, appear where he is not waiting for you.
- If you make it so that the opponents do not know the place and date of the battle, you can always win.
- If you use the enemy to defeat the enemy, you will be strong wherever you go.
- Knowing how to counteract third parties, we can achieve victory without even lifting a finger.
“The best war is to break the plans of the enemy; in the next place - to break his alliances; in the next place - to break his troops. The worst thing is to besiege fortresses.“
— Sun Tzu.

In the USA and among the "partners" they know Sun Tzu and know how to use it.

[opuonmed]

europe + usa 1 lard + technical strong opponents of their current will stop nuclear weapons nothing more!

[yuliatreb]

Depending on what to fight for and where to fight, it’s one thing to defend your own, it’s another thing to take away someone else’s, who do you think is more motivated. The navel is torn.

[opuonmed]

I'm not talking about how and with whom and for what I'm talking about a global war))

[Uprun]

Are they preparing a "humanitarian" mission of Nata in Russia or the outskirts? Smooth on paper, but forgot about the ravines. Turkey and Hungary, in my opinion, will not sign up for this adventure unless they are asked to simply stand back and not speak. A question for the Germans and the French, with a can, notably striped legs were wiped about them .....

[kor1vet1974]

According to the news agency, the alliance is preparing a new secret agreement

If a secret agreement is known to a news outlet, it is no longer secret.

[rotmistr60]

NATO is developing a new plan in case the alliance countries participate in several military conflicts at once, including on the territory of other countries

Plans can be developed, but will NATO pull several conflicts at once and not with natives, but with countries that have combat-ready armies with air force, air defense, navy and missile weapons? After all, it is not difficult to guess that NATO under the leadership of the United States unequivocally assumes possible conflicts with Russia, as well as with Iran, North Korea and, of course, China. Who in this bloc will be able to fight except the Americans, the British, the French, the Poles and the Germans (the Turks are questionable)? Maybe the Balts with the Bulgarians and Romanians or the Belgians? And they urgently took up the development of plans because they already got into the Ukrainian conflict up to their ears and feel how everything could end with further escalation.

[tihonmarine]

According to the news agency, the alliance is preparing a new secret agreement, which will contain plans for possible actions of NATO countries in the event of several military conflicts at once.

Although the agreement with the "secret", but it is clear that they are preparing Poland, the Baltic states and Romania for war with Russia.

[Mikhail Maslov]

Well, right with Russia, there is an opportunity "to train in Serbia", do not forget about Syria, you can "fight" there. But China is a rather distant prospect and without weakening it is not an economically easy task. As for Russia, our reaction to what is happening is very, very strange. That is why a plan or several plans "Barbarossa in modern execution" may arise. They will develop, they will leak, they will concentrate NATO on the borders. More serious provocations are quite possible. but we are not answering anything.

[Leader_Barmaleev]

I will now say a thought that is seditious at first glance - there is no NATO MILITARY bloc, there is a NATO inventory cartel in which everyone is happy to produce and sell to each other various shooters and rumblers, where budgets are sawn and chatter is generated. And when it comes down to it, then all the fierce friends in the block will suddenly feel the difference in "pulling the blanket on their own" and "pulling the blanket on themselves." And of course, the Americans will be the first to decide that the entire NATO bloc should protect them, and quickly the participants will all be weighed, measured and decided - who should be cannon fodder, and who should count the profits. What I'm saying is that if several parallel conflicts flare up that require a military solution, then the NATO bloc will fall apart in a few minutes. But what will begin after this is unclear and unpredictable ...

[HAM]

Yes, your idea is not so seditious .... there is a seller-USA, and there are suckers-buyers, and the sucker needs to be more scared and offer "protection" by creating a collective farm and shake off their shooters ...

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Leader_Barmaleev

I am saying this to the fact that if several parallel conflicts flare up that require a military solution, then the NATO bloc will fall apart in a few minutes.

And it is desirable that parallel conflicts (at least one) arise on the territory of Europe.

[Mavrikiy]

NATO is developing a new plan in case the countries of the alliance participate in several military conflicts at once, including on the territory of other countries, so to speak, outside the "zone of responsibility"

Are you hinting at Ukraine and Belarus? And with your "zone of responsibility" is already in order, have you coped?

[Grandfather Mozai]

Any zugzwang may have a way out, but it will be bad for everyone.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Grandfather Mozai

Any zugzwang may have a way out, but it will be bad for everyone.

This would probably be good too:

[Alexander Soviet Union]

Quote: Leader_Barmaleev

there is a NATO inventory cartel in which everyone is happy to produce and sell to each other different shooters and rumblers, where budgets are sawn and chatter is generated

The world is hanging by a thread, and they are thinking about profit, - to paraphrase one famous movie character.

[Leader_Barmaleev]

Just about, as one of the characters of some buffoonery said - "they suddenly noticed that their eggs were between the hammer and the pan, and they themselves were under the ax of Damocles" ...

[APASUS]

It is not for nothing that they burn the Koran so diligently in Stockholm, and it is even easy to calculate the next American steps

[Cuban]

It is high time to start various conflicts, especially with Israel and the United States - their cities must be destroyed, not Ukrainian ones - we have three allies at once in North and Central America Cuba Nicaragua and Venezuela; also in Asia, China, North Korea may, with the good work of Mr. Lavrov, and India join; there is also Argentina, which is at war with the Britons because of the Falklands

[Mint Gingerbread]

How are they going to fight? In the buffer zone called Ukraine? Or there will be another victim. Russia, according to its doctrine, has the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of an invasion of its territory. Then only a nuclear conflict. This is not the second world, where no one else had enough technology.

[aszzz888]

NATO is developing a new plan in case the countries of the alliance participate in several military conflicts at once, including on the territory of other countries, so to speak, outside the "zone of responsibility" of the bloc.

And the bloomers don't repnut? p.c. dead herring that one stgatetag!