The network published footage of the attack on the bridge in Zatoka near Odessa using a marine drone

The Ukrainian side publishes a video online, the captions to which indicate that it depicts an attack on a bridge in the town of Zatoka, Odessa region. Recall that earlier several missiles were fired over this bridge at different times. Then the Ukrainian side took measures to repair this bridge, through which military cargo (including fuel for military equipment) went to the Odessa region from neighboring countries, including Moldova and Romania.

This time, the railroad bridge at Zatoka was allegedly attacked with surface drone.

On the frames below, which are dated February 10, 2023 (at least, such an inscription is displayed on the frames from the surveillance camera), you can see how the object is approaching the bridge at a fairly high speed through the water. As soon as he is directly under the bridge, an explosion follows.

The reports say that the drone was moving from the Black Sea.

Recall that earlier the Ukrainian side repeatedly tried to attack the objects of the Black Sea fleet RF, including ships, in Sevastopol using marine drones. Most of those attacks were carried out from Ochakov, Mykolaiv region. Subsequently, several strikes were carried out on military targets in Ochakovo. At least two of them were carried out by the RF Armed Forces yesterday, including a strike by a Geran-type drone.

There is no official confirmation that the attack on the bridge in Zatoka was carried out by the Russian side.

Comments

[voice of reason]

So far, an incomprehensible story. But if it's an alternative way to destroy bridges without sacrificing recon teams and spending hundreds of missiles, that's very good. Then all bridges in Sumeria should be deindustrialized as soon as possible.
Now the position of the cissota will be interesting, which tried to delay the blows from the energy sector to the bridges in order to cause the useless waste of high-precision missiles. Now what are they going to scream? like damage to bridges will not affect the state of the VFU? or they will say that it is inefficient and bridges cannot be destroyed like that, stop trying? Or will they silently minusrait in impotent rage? We will understand what they are afraid of according to ratings and reviews!

[Cat Alexandrovich]

That's just, judging by the video, the bridge is not destroyed and not even badly damaged. Flight goal...

[ARIONkrsk]

Quote: Cat Alexandrovich

That's just, judging by the video, the bridge is not destroyed and not even badly damaged. Flight goal...

It is not a fact that now it will withstand a loaded train.

[ratoborets]

Down and Out trouble started ...
If the RF Armed Forces have begun to use surface drones, then this is already a huge plus. One drone may not have caused serious damage, but it allows you to draw conclusions and be more successful next time. Also, if there are any shortcomings, identify them and improve the drone in the future (improve accuracy, if you need to increase the weight of the charge in a future modification, etc.).

[svp67]

Quote from: ratoborets

but it allows you to draw conclusions and be more successful next time.

So the enemy will draw conclusions and install boom and network protective fences there

[Mr. PeZhe]

There's something with a screw for every tricky asshole. The first drone will blow up the boom, the second one will break through to the bridge support.

[Hanurik]

What prevented you from sending several at once? It was not clear that one was not enough?

[Mr. PeZhe]

Rumor has it that it was an experimental sample in one copy. Test-combat launch.

[Saburov_Alexander53]

...the second will break through to the bridge support.
I suppose the supports are well protected along the perimeter, like the supports of the Crimean bridge, when even a ram by a huge tanker is not terrible. In this case, the charge of such a small drone was hardly enough for serious damage, otherwise we would have celebrated such a victory in all the media. Tracking a traffic violation on the bridge is not a problem for our space intelligence. And if there is complete silence, two days after the attack, it means that not everything is so simple with this and all other bridges in Ukraine.

[dmi.pris1]

It’s very good if we have such a weapon. Of course, he didn’t hit the bridge support, but if so, then this is the beginning

[TRex]

"Such a weapon" appeared in our country back in the 70s of the last century. By the way, the engine from the BMP was used ... A whole range of models for various purposes was developed. If we approach this issue creatively, we can see a lot of interesting things with the use of these products.

[Vladimir-78]

This is a shame, especially if you look into the future. A lot of developments were taken out of a dusty cabinet. "Made in USSR". In other areas, the picture is similar. At least I can judge by "my" tank theme.

[Sid2014]

Video about nothing. When the bridge collapses, then there will be a conversation. It's like in football we rejoice when we score goals, and when they win tournaments. Just a weak attempt by the Black Sea Fleet to remind of its existence, well, yesterday's Caliber strikes. (Or have you heard of other successful operations) From beyond the reach of harpoons and neptunes. Now downvote!

[dmmyak40]

Do you want the carriers to be in the zone of destruction of Harpoons and Neptunes? Funny! Do you think that the commander of any ship dreams of catching anti-ship missiles at the tip?

[Egeny]

It is a pity that the commander of the "Moscow" did not read your comment, maybe the ship was intact.

[svp67]

Quote: Cat Alexandrovich

That's just, judging by the video, the bridge is not destroyed and not even badly damaged. Flight goal...

In Tsarist Russia and the USSR they knew how to build bridges, with a large margin, and they didn’t span there, but tried to destroy the support, this is a more effective way to destroy the bridge

[megadeth]

Dashing trouble, the beginning ... Trial balloon ... At least something, they began to undertake to destroy bridges (unless, of course, this is not an enemy staging), it means that someone at the top began to reach ...

[Goha]

Yes! It turned out to be a fluff. The bridge was largely undamaged. You can carry weapons again. This is not a major bridge destruction, clapperboard.

[Govorun]

The degree of damage to the bridge is discussed by a person who sits in a warm apartment on an easy chair from the TV screen ... well, you are either a VERY gifted person with superpowers (then provide your analysis of the damage received), or you are VERY stupid, typical of "experts" of couch troops balabol...

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: Cat Alexandrovich

That's just, judging by the video, the bridge is not destroyed and not even badly damaged. Flight goal...

Judging by the video, yes, it seems to be intact. And judging by the statements of the Jews, they didn’t go over this bridge, like, but we don’t need such a bridge, fie on it !!! - And this means that the bridge has become unsuitable for transportation .. So the video, shmideo, is not an indicator !!

[Klisha]

Hammer in Yandex - undermining the bridge in the Odessa region, go to - Pictures. Admire.

[_Valery_]

There are already pictures with the result of the hit. It went normally.

[Saburov_Alexander53]

there are pictures with the result of the hit. ok.
It would be interesting to know how and from where such a drone is controlled. If by GPS, then why was it sent not under the span and to the lift support, where all the mechanics for lifting the fairway section of the bridge are installed?

[KostikTail]

These are pictures from last year. The consequences of a missile strike on the bridge on May 28, sort of.

[aiden]

I don't know what to call it, destroyed or not. But in my opinion, the bridge is not suitable for its purpose.

[Dedok]

Quote: aiden

I don't know what to call it, destroyed or not. But in my opinion, the bridge is not suitable for its purpose.

pictures from what date, year?
the attack was from below, not from above

[KostikTail]

This photo is easily located as the aftermath of a rocket attack on the bridge in May last year.

[Dedok]

Quote: Cat Alexandrovich

Flight goal...

on the flights of the bridge they worked with rockets - unsuccessfully
and the marine drone worked on the bridge supports, what are the results of the attack - let's see if the trains go or not
it should be noted that the bridge consists of two separate lines/bridges: damage to one of them will not stop traffic on the other...
By the way, the hit was on the inner support - from the sea - was it deliberately induced or accidental?

[ARIONkrsk]

Quote: voice of reason

So far, an incomprehensible story. But if it's an alternative way to destroy bridges without sacrificing recon teams and spending hundreds of missiles, that's very good. Then all bridges in Sumeria should be deindustrialized as soon as possible.
Now the position of the cissota will be interesting, which tried to delay the blows from the energy sector to the bridges in order to cause the useless waste of high-precision missiles. Now what are they going to scream? like damage to bridges will not affect the state of the VFU? or they will say that it is inefficient and bridges cannot be destroyed like that, stop trying? Or will they silently minusrait in impotent rage? We will understand what they are afraid of according to ratings and reviews!

Perhaps in this way they decided to test a water drone in combat conditions, and not to save missiles, a drone is also a high-tech weapon.

[bayard]

Quote from ARIONkrsk

Perhaps in this way they decided to test a water drone in combat conditions,

The sons of Bandera have long tested such such devices, and just such - surface (!! ) semi-submerged (!). And in the case of the Sumerians, this really seemed justified - the vehicles had to travel several (two or three) hundreds of miles to their targets in Sevastopol and the Crimea. But why is the RF Armed Forces?
And why exactly so?
And ... LIKE THIS?
It was possible to simply launch an UNDERWATER remote-controlled drone, slowly and PRECISELY bring it to the bridge support, and guaranteed (!) To blow it up.
The Russian Federation has such underwater UAVs.
And such as in the frames - NO!
But the Armed Forces of Ukraine have them ... from the British.
Moreover, in the footage, the BPA confidently DOES NOT hit the bull, NOT hitting it. And the charge is obviously ... weaker than what is needed.
Imitation?
EXACTLY .
What for ?
To switch arrows in the event and during the next terrorist attacks ... but already at other hydraulic facilities ... let's say ... on the cascade of the Dnieper hydroelectric power stations ... after all, they (the fascists of Kyiv and their Anglo-Saxon curators) have been flooding since the spring of last year that "Russia will blow up the Kyiv dam", "It will blow up the cascade of hydroelectric power stations" ... while this cascade has been around for a long time - since 2015. .. mined by specialists from an American military engineering company ... there are charges in the very body of the dams and therefore they are GUARANTEED to fly into the air ...
But is it necessary to accuse SOMEONE of such barbarism?
With at least some "evidence base".
To IMMEDIATELY point a finger ... as in the case of the Nord Streams.
So they composed an ostentatious and fruitless pyrotechnic show.
So do not be surprised when shortly after the start ... or during our February or ... spring offensive, when the fronts of the Nazis collapse, very strange and monstrously destructive explosions begin to occur.
And they WILL happen.
For one of the main reasons for the autumn regrouping from the right bank of the Kherson region was the threat of undermining the Kakhovka dam.
With flooding of vast territories.
Now look up the map, count the major cities along the Dnieper and estimate the scale of the consequences and victims.
THIS IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS SIMULATION.

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: bayard

the devices had to go several (two or three) hundreds of miles to their targets in Sevastopol and Crimea.

Well, well .. Hundreds of miles ... All these semi-submersible American, or British drones were fired from "grain deal" ships passing thirty kilometers from the coast of Sevastopol. After that, the "grain deal" was suspended for some time ... And then resumed on Russia's terms. Our semi-submersible drone was most likely launched from our warships, or submarines.

[bayard]

Quote: 30 vis

Our semi-submersible drone was most likely launched from our warships

This is not our drone.
The Armed Forces of Ukraine and England have such drones.
And ours could simply hit with a torpedo from the ship. Or an underwater drone

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: bayard

This is not our drone.
The Armed Forces of Ukraine and England have such drones.

Mynystr zaluzhny complained to Milli that the Russian Army uses semi-submersible drones! "Zaluzhny complained to Milly about the use of surface drones by the Russian army
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Zaluzhny confirmed the use of sea surface UAVs by Russia
February 11 - NVL. The Ukrainian commander-in-chief also complained that the use of new Russian UAVs allegedly poses a threat to shipping in the Black Sea, "and the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine reported on February 11 that the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny had a telephone conversation with the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley.

During this conversation, Zaluzhny informed his American handler that the Russian armed forces had begun using surface drones that posed a threat to Ukrainian communications.

Thus, the Ukrainian side has officially confirmed the use by the Russian army of new surface kamikaze drones, one of which attacked the bridge across the Zatoka in Odessa yesterday.

As previously reported, this bridge connecting Ukraine with Romania was attacked on February 10 by a surface kamikaze UAV from the Black Sea. As a result of the attack, the load-bearing supports of the structure were damaged. Find your own sources! And yes, a little zest ... These semi-submersible drones are probably produced in Sevastopol. And now they've tested it. Or maybe they are not made in Sevastopol .. But they are doing it !!!

[bayard]

I do not believe in the Russian affiliation of these drones. Just as I don’t believe that the “supporting structures” of the bridge supports were damaged - the drone MISSED, passing next to (!) The support and was blown up while on the water under the span of the bridge. And the force of the explosion was not too great to seriously damage something ... And the Ukrainians yelled that ... the support was damaged? Although none of our other hits are ever mentioned and the population is criminally liable for such messages?
I do not believe .
All this is too revealing and deliberate. And immediately a complaint to the British.
What for ?
Perhaps in order to encourage the British and other NATO to organize the protection of Ukraine from the sea with their ships. But the main thing - read above.
This is a precedent.
And if Russia does not refute this cartoon, future explosions of the Dnieper dams, floods and the death of millions of inhabitants of the Dnieper region will be hanged on ... of course, on the Russians.
After all, they are "already".
"Then - over the bridge."

And once again I remind you the official reason for the withdrawal of our group from the Kherson bridgehead - THE THREAT OF UNDERING THE DAMS OF THE KAKHOVSKAYA HEP."

[Jager]

Yes, the undermining of dams was not a critical factor.

[bayard]

Quote: Jager

Yes, the undermining of dams was not a critical factor.

When do the dams of the Dnieper Cascade explode in succession?
When a wave from the reservoirs, washing away everything in its path, rushes to the mouth, destroying million-plus cities and other smaller ones, the entire infrastructure, overflowing on the sloping side and creating huge swampy spaces ... yes, simply - the death of several million civilian residents of the Dnieper region, which Russia will be accused of and will they make us a bogey worse than Nazi Germany?

Quote: Jager

Yes, the undermining of dams was not a critical factor.

Quote: bayard

And once again I remind you the official reason for the withdrawal of our group from the Kherson bridgehead - THE THREAT OF UNDERING THE DAMS OF THE KAKHOVSKAYA HEP."

[Novichek]

. To IMMEDIATELY point a finger ... as in the case of the Nord Streams

. Logically. I hold the same point of view. And the fact that they immediately "ran to complain" to the "strongholds of democracy" is a big plus in favor of this version. If something like this appeared in ours, then half a year before that they would have already begun to arrange "PR" and connect all sorts of royal wolves)) Ato here on the forum, the majority is already "rolling their lips" with joy. Almost broke the last button accordion)) "

what a holiday!

[Denis812]

Now the position of the cissota will be interesting, which was trying to delay the blows from the energy sector to the bridges in order to cause the useless waste of high-precision missiles. Now what are they going to scream?
Approximately this:
"The bridge is not needed, this is an outdated approach, NATO will supply us with thousands of pontoons"
"It's even better if there is no old bridge, anyway, because of their weight, it was impossible to transport Abrams over it, now the United States will build us a new, more load-bearing bridge"
"It's good that the bridge was destroyed, it was a symbol of the bloody communist era, it was high time to remove it!"

[Roman1970]

Yes, there are plenty of excuses. Well, the result is important for us.

[ivan1979nkl]

all bridges in Sumeria must be deindustrialized

you can try to launch these drones along the Dnieper and attack the Dnieper bridges

[Argon]

Incomprehensible history with incomprehensible date. Why is the video showing up now?

[svp67]

Quote: voice of reason

But if it's an alternative way to destroy bridges without sacrificing recon teams and spending hundreds of missiles, that's very good.

It is a pity that the attack is not massive, since now the enemy will take countermeasures, in this case, the installation of booms and net barriers

[Guards turn]

All bridges were supposed to collapse for the first time in February last year, and then regularly as they are restored

[cpls22]

The situation is murky. The bridge is still not operational - judging by the GPS tracks, it is used only as a pedestrian bridge. Why spend anything on it? The only logical option is to check for minefields in the bay, or the target was in the bay, and the drone ran into a minefield. The video does not open, so I can not judge by the nature of the explosion - is it so.

[NikolayDS]

Now the position of the cissota will be interesting

No hints! Let them think...

[Fizik13]

Quote: voice of reason

So far, an incomprehensible story ........

It's called Ala Verdy

[Saburov_Alexander53]

...all bridges in Sumeria should be deindustrialized as soon as possible.
Seems not so easy to do. This bridge is the most valuable and unique of its kind. It is worth looking at the map, this is practically the only railway and road that directly connects Ukraine with Romania. Bypassing the estuary there is a highway, but it enters the territory of Moldova. It's scary for Sandu to openly let military cargo through it. A dozen and a half "Caliber" for the year of the SVO could not destroy this bridge, they decided to try from the sea .... Once again, the understanding comes that "everything in life is not the way it really is."

[Andrey Andreev_2]

An alternative way to ensure the destruction of Ukraine's logistics system, which includes bridges, tunnels, railway hubs, etc., could be the use of decommissioned ballistic missiles equipped with conventional charges. It is no secret to anyone that as part of the rearmament of the Strategic Missile Forces, the process of replacing Topols with Yarsy, Voevods with Sarmatians is underway ... The Americans are given an ultimatum: the first NATO tank or aircraft in Ukraine corresponds to the destruction of Ukraine's infrastructure in this way. And that's it!! But now, for some reason, this issue is being blocked by someone (((It is better to deal with the disposal of missiles, more money can be mastered. Or maybe their owners, including China, do not allow logistics businesses to break down ...

[rotmistr60]

There is no official confirmation that the attack on the bridge in Zatoka was carried out by the Russian side.

Well, didn’t Budanov decide to attack his bridge? Judging by the video, the span of the bridge did not collapse, but it's a pity.

[Lech from Android.]

Quote: rotmistr60

Judging by the video, the span of the bridge did not collapse, but it's a pity.

The drone itself got close to the object intact, this is already a success ... next time the weight of the explosives will be different.

[Pankrat25]

I'm afraid next time, he might be in for a surprise.

[Lech from Android.]

Quote: Pankrat25

I'm afraid next time, he might be in for a surprise.

I'm afraid next time there will be two drones ... the first one will pave the way ... this is only one of the options.

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: Pankrat25

I'm afraid next time, he might be in for a surprise.

Be afraid, don't be afraid, but the bridge was put out of action.

[Sergey Averchenkov]

"On the Net"... The Web is such crap that I don't see the point in believing it. I'd rather wait for official confirmation.

[Oleg Apushkin]

There you need at least 5 such drones. They just showed up, but the task was not completed.

[Fedor Rashkin]

Yesterday there was news that ukrov were taken to Belgium to teach naval drones ...
Looks like they are learning.
But seriously, even interesting.
Moreover, it exploded not from contact with the support, but under the span.
Well, it would be interesting to know the result.

[ivan1979nkl]

exploded not from contact with the support, but under the span

it is advisable to hit the supports, but I think it's harder to hit

[DefenderofTruth]

Nothing complicated - there is an online camera installed on the drone for accurate aiming.

[Sandor Clegane]

there is reason to believe that this video is a fake, we must wait for what the RF Ministry of Defense will say

[Egor Maksimov]

Considering that earlier a caliber flew to the same place a couple of times, there may be serious damage at the bridge support. And this is much more serious than the destruction of the span.

[ratoborets]

Even despite the fact that the bridge remained intact, the use of a surface drone cannot but rejoice.

The main thing is that a start has been made. Calibers with daggers, despite their high accuracy, are hard to hit exactly on the support. If the surface drone is controlled remotely, and not only follows the initially set route, then it is quite possible to hit the support and cause serious damage and make movement impossible (when destroying spans).

Since they began to use surface drones in combat conditions, this makes it possible for designers to identify shortcomings, make improvements and modifications to the model used.

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote from: ratoborets

If the surface drone is controlled remotely, and not only follows the initially set route, then it is quite possible to hit the support and cause serious damage and make movement impossible (when destroying spans).

I agree with you, but by radio communication - it won’t work out so far - to control the drone by the operator, based on the laws of physics .. accordingly, either the operator remains in the target area - taking control upon arrival or a more correct option - communication via satellite, which I’m not sure about that everything is fine, because we don’t hear anything about Starlink’s analogues - for installation on a drone .. i.e. the version that he just walked along the coordinates is most likely reliable and you shouldn’t particularly expect hits on the supports, all the more so - a penetrating charge or just a huge bang is desirable for the support, if nearby ..

[Zaurbek]

Could still recognize images to undermine in the right place

[2 Level Advisor]

it’s also possible in principle, but noticeably less reliable .. they put a barge, hung a net, waves or something else and the recognition will “trouble”, and even try to make the “pictures” for the system from the water - this is not from space .. Khikhlov when Sevastopol was attacked, it was video control, the most reliable .. a campaign through Starlink, but if it is lost, it can also be done by images .. through images, this is supposed to be an additional system, and not the main one, it’s too unreliable, it’s for UAVs not bad - everything is clearly visible from above ..

[Hanurik]

If you saw a video from the caliber that was launched across the bridge, you would not be driven to the accuracy of the caliber, but to the absent brain of the officer who set the course for this caliber. After all, they attacked just from the same course as the drone, that is, across the supports, where they have a minimum projection and maximum strength, and even when attacking along the missile itself, it will crash into some kind of support, and across it it will either hit one or will fly into the water. And yes, this is not the reasoning of a couch warrior, this is a method of air attack of all attack aircraft in the world, from the USSR to the USA. Just look at the footage of attacks such as trains during the landing of Americans in Normandy.

[Mikhail Ivanov]

Ukrainian received the same in the same place!
The range of weapons is expanding. Now not only Ukrainians, but also their friends should think about it! For example, the same surface airship could sink a couple of ferries with armored personnel carriers from mattresses to the bottom ...

[Mikhail Ivanov]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

The web is such crap that I don't see the point in believing it. I'd rather wait for official confirmation.

Yeah, the Five Fighter will now talk about five blown bridges

[evgen1221]

We seem to have analogues of the point and more powerful in terms of warheads. Well, they would not regret pieces. One rocket to the bridge is usually a pellet for an elephant, if not a direct hit, then there are no collapses and it is repaired quickly.

[Vladimir-78]

It is possible that the span is intact, but the support is damaged. You can even walk on foot, but the freight train will no longer pass.

[Zaurbek]

Maybe it was their drone that got lost and returned to base?

[Igor K_2]

It is customary in our news to put the cart before the horse, we become crested. It is better to wait for visual confirmation of the destruction of the bridge, then publish. The railway bridge is an incredibly difficult target, it is not so easy to destroy it, it is designed for monstrous loads and you need to very accurately calculate the impact, at what point, the amount of explosives, etc., there is probably not enough bull to demolish a ton of TNT. As an example, the Crimean bridge, I have no doubt that a very large team of Western intelligence agencies worked on the sabotage, while having all the necessary technical documents for the bridge, everything in this sabotage was painfully well verified.

[BorzRio]

Video from the Ukrainian side ... Where is the criminal liability for publishing photos and videos of attacks on vpzhnye objects .... Some kind of stuffing and nothing else.

[igor.borov775]

Hello everyone on the site. Yes, they sang. Nearby there is an interesting thing that the builders of the Black Sea have created. And not much time has passed and forgotten. Kherson does not say anything, but it’s a pity you need to learn from mistakes. We made holes in the bridge and fenders. Beautiful and elegant. The bridge is intact, but the car is not moving. And here before here they were fussing, they say, rockets are wasted in vain. Who does not study will spend more to get the result. Sorry if this is not the case, but unfortunately this works with good results.

[cniza]

you can see how the object at a sufficiently high speed is approaching the bridge through the water. As soon as he is directly under the bridge, an explosion follows.

There are many questions, everything looks like partisanism ...

[agond]

It looks like the power of the charge was not enough to destroy the span (probably more explosives could have been loaded into the boat), if the explosion had not occurred on the surface, but, say, at the bottom (if it is deep enough under the bridge), then the mass of the column of raised water could have had a greater effect. The span of a railway bridge can be destroyed, for example, by damaging the top chord of the truss at any point in its length, but for this it is necessary to get into a structural element with a cross section of only a little more than 05.x0.5m.

[KCA]

Against bridges, use drones only with a mass of explosives of at least a ton, a ton of explosives would at least crack the span, the stump is clear, the cartoon, but, well, maybe the kids dabbled, back in Soviet times there were boats and yachts on radio control, but small ones, we have a friend had a yacht, at that time it was just a masterpiece, the whole beach gathered when they launched

[DefenderofTruth]

With bridges across the Dnieper, this will not work - the riverbed is blocked by hydroelectric dams, and if they are blown up, rapids will be found.

[Semyon Semyonov_2]

This is not an undermining but an imitation. Therefore, there is no confirmation from the Russian side.

[Sandor Clegane]

Quote: Semyon Semenov_2

This is not an undermining but an imitation. Therefore, there is no confirmation from the Russian side.

1. And it won’t, since MORP has nothing to do with this
2. The video from the side of the dill came out immediately after the explosion, and this says a lot to the smart ones!
3. At the same time, the video of our broken tank company is fake for them, although there is already just a bunch of evidence! Including from among our military

[azkolt]

To be honest, I'm already very happy about it!

[Serge9901]

Solidarity. For decades they sang about the "army and navy" and so what? In the bottom line, without conventions? How do we differ from the Iraqis, for example? Calibers (100 units per week) and S-300 (which Ukrainians have early ones) and even Engels is not enough. All ? Developments, yes, there are, sort of. Everything is at the level of rumors and media pictures for us and at the level of cut for Moscow. As a citizen, I should not be interested in how and with what they are going to win. At all. I went to the military registration and enlistment office, - "do you have experience, do you need it?", - "no, sit straight, old one." OK. And let the bosses in the Kremlin decide for themselves, this is THEIR JOB. And how to teach and cherish children abroad - well done, to perform on talk shows - eagles, but how to solve problems - "The Motherland is in danger."

[solar]

To damage the bridge, the charge power is needed much more and you need to hit the support. More power - more dimensions, more engine, more fuel, more visibility - which means that it is more likely that they will be detected and open fire, which means that more protection is needed, and this means more weight. Vicious circle.
A separate topic is the guidance system. If autonomous, there must be pattern recognition, which is not easy.
But in general, for a long time, to protect against the passage of surface ships, chains were pulled, and from underwater, anti-submarine nets. If the threat becomes real, all networks will be pulled (if they exist, of course)

[Sergey_B]

Was it worth it to "reveal the cards" by attacking one? Next time they can come up with something against these UAVs.

[Carlos Hall]

Magnificent attack. Let's hope more will be done against this bridge

[Pavel_Sveshnikov]

Useless prank. The bridge did nothing. They would gasp with tactical nuclear weapons. You would see the bridge would have evaporated, as if it were not there. A year to build a new one. Or maybe they didn’t build it at all, since there would also be contamination of the area. In Vietnam, the Americans bombed one bridge for three years, they could not destroy it with traditional weapons. Well, if not with nuclear weapons, then some kind of chemical material must be used that will corrode the iron of this bridge, or burn this iron with a chemical reaction.

[Sergey3]

Useless prank.

Here is a recent picture from the scene:

[Lendrom]

This photo is from May last year, when they tried to destroy the caliber

[polynet]

Meet - new - floating air conditioner

[polynet]

Quote: Pavel_Sveshnikov

Useless prank. The bridge did nothing. They would gasp with tactical nuclear weapons. You would see the bridge would have evaporated, as if it were not there. A year to build a new one. Or maybe they didn’t build it at all, since there would also be contamination of the area. In Vietnam, the Americans bombed one bridge for three years, they could not destroy it with traditional weapons. Well, if not with nuclear weapons, then some kind of chemical material must be used that will corrode the iron of this bridge, or burn this iron with a chemical reaction.

followed by 4 missiles flew in and the Ukrainians wrote - that's it for the bridge.

[Sergey3]

Strongly built under the USSR, it seems that in order to destroy this structure, a whole barge with explosives is needed.

[Evgeny Ivanov_5]

In general, it’s more like not a drone, but a raft or a boat with a VU. They went downstream and blew it up.

[75 Sergey]

The nets are stretched in front of the bridge and the whole is short-lived.
Iskaderich definitely cannot get into the support?

[Sergei N 58912062]

It is quite possible that the Iranian fire-ship Bavar was used during the attack on the bridge.
I hope the bridge has sustained sufficient damage to render it unable to function.

[Novichek]

. Iranian fire ship Bavar.

Yes, it’s not Russian, it’s a drone, definitely, and the trouble is that it’s just a hohlopprovocation!

[DO]

The excess pressure of the shock wave under water is ten times higher than in air, with the same explosion power and radius.
Hitting the base of a bridge pier underwater near the bottom with a naval missile might be more effective.