Roskosmos completed one hundred successful launches of space rockets in a row

53
Roskosmos completed one hundred successful launches of space rockets in a row

Since October 2018, the Russian corporation Roscosmos has completed one hundred successful launches of space launch vehicles in a row. Of these, 46 rockets were launched from the Baikonur cosmodrome, 36 from the Plesetsk cosmodrome, and nine successful launches each were carried out from the Vostochny cosmodrome and the space center in the French department in Guiana.

During this time, 82 launches of rockets of the Soyuz family, 11 launches of Proton-M carrier rockets, four launches of Angara rockets, and three launches of Rokot carrier rockets were carried out.



In June 2021, a record-breaking history post-Soviet Russia, the number of successful launches of space rockets. Within one month, 60 launch vehicles were launched in a row. The previous similar record was recorded between 1992 and March 1993, when 59 missiles were successfully launched.



On Thursday, February 9, the Soyuz-2.1a space launch vehicle was launched, which delivered the Progress MS-22 cargo space transport vehicle into orbit. Its first and second stages were equipped with RD-107A / RD-108A engines, which ensured the delivery of cargo with a total mass of 2,5 tons to the International Space Station.

The delivered cargo will ensure the further continuation of the manned flight mode of the station, as well as the implementation of the Russian program of scientific and applied research.

This was the first launch this year of a Soyuz-2 launch vehicle with UEC-Kuznetsov mass-produced engines. It is noted that the statistical reliability of such equipment exceeds 99,9%.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    9 February 2023 16: 46
    Nice to read articles like this! There is something to be proud of
    1. -2
      9 February 2023 19: 36
      Yes, that's just the point - the launches are successful. But for some reason, the devices (some) that were later withdrawn almost immediately leave the race, lose control, and stupidly conventionally fall. And it turns out if you look from the point of view of efficiency - minus the number of satellites that did not work, for some reason, Roscosmos quietly kept silent.
      Cosmos-2560 was launched on October 15, 2022 from the Plesetsk military cosmodrome using the Angara-1.2 light rocket. After the launch, Roskosmos and the Russian Ministry of Defense reported that a stable connection had been established and maintained with the device, and its onboard systems were operating normally. However, for the entire time it was in orbit, Cosmos-2560 did not perform a single maneuver. The satellite's orbit was decreasing daily, eventually it began to fall. On December 10, he entered the earth's atmosphere and burned up in the sky over the Pacific Ocean near the island of Guam.
      As a result, Cosmos-2560 shared the fate of its two predecessors (Cosmos-2555 and Cosmos-2551). After entering orbit, they also did not perform a single maneuver and burned up in the atmosphere, respectively, 19 and 41 days after launch.
      hi Russia currently has 12 Earth remote sensing satellites (ERS) for military and civil purposes in orbit, two of which (Kosmos-2486 and Kosmos-2506) have already exceeded their design life...
      The share of launch failures and in-orbit failures for reconnaissance satellites launched by Russia since 2015 has exceeded 70%.
      real manifestations of support for the Russian army from reconnaissance satellites currently in orbit are almost invisible. From the very beginning of the NMD, the Russian military has clearly lacked satellite reconnaissance capabilities, while Western countries have mobilized about 200 commercial remote sensing satellites with a very high level (0,3-0,5 m) of optical imaging in support of Ukraine ... ..
      so yes, the statistics are beautiful. The main thing is how to show your work. Successful launches. Well, you think then they fall ...
      1. 0
        10 February 2023 13: 47
        Quote: zloybond
        Yes, that's just the point - the launches are successful. But for some reason, the devices (some) that were later withdrawn almost immediately leave the race, lose control, and stupidly conventionally fall.


        No, they don't fall. All spacecraft are working or have already worked according to their programs.

        Quote: zloybond
        And it turns out if you look from the point of view of efficiency - minus the number of satellites that did not work, for some reason, Roscosmos quietly kept silent.


        Roskosmos carried out a withdrawal of over 570 spacecraft. What did you say about efficiency? lol

        Quote: zloybond
        Cosmos-2560 was launched on October 15, 2022......


        Short-lived experimental ICAs that have worked out their programs. Everything else on the network is sucked from the finger.

        Quote: zloybond
        Russia currently has 12 Earth remote sensing satellites (ERS) for military and civil purposes in orbit, two of which (Kosmos-2486 and Kosmos-2506) have already exceeded their design life...


        Wrong. Here is the current scheme of the "civilian" remote sensing grouping:



        The spacecraft "Electro-L" No. 4 has just joined this group. In addition to the satellites shown in the diagram, the constellations also include spacecraft from satellite manufacturers. For example, Aist-2D from the RCC "Progress" or MKA "Orbikraft-Zorkiy" from the private company Sputniks.

        This year, two more radar vehicles and one highly detailed optical are flying.

        Quote: zloybond
        The share of launch failures and in-orbit failures for reconnaissance satellites launched by Russia since 2015 has exceeded 70%.


        Wrong. Not later than at the end of last year, the "military" group included another cartographer, the fourth in a row, as well as electronic intelligence devices.

        There is no point in spreading lies here. lol
  2. -16
    9 February 2023 16: 48
    Since October 2018...

    Roughly - for 4 years with a penny of 25 launches only ... in the USSR they launched more per year am and we brag about it? am am am
    1. +3
      9 February 2023 17: 03
      Do not confuse the USSR with Russia. Tashkent, the Baltic States, Tbilisi and Chisinau, all this is the USSR. Russia is just a fragment of that civilization. Bigger shard.
    2. -1
      9 February 2023 17: 07
      Quote: Corona without virus
      Roughly - for 4 years with a penny of 25 launches only ... in the USSR they launched more per year

      The launch of the Union is like $ 70 million, so count it.
    3. +3
      9 February 2023 17: 34
      Quote: Corona without virus
      in the USSR launched more per year

      Not every.
      1. NKT
        +3
        9 February 2023 19: 08
        Much more, here are the statistics. The peak was in 1982 - 108, 9 unsuccessful

    4. +2
      9 February 2023 17: 51
      Quote: Crown without virus
      Roughly - for 4 years with a penny of 25 launches only ... in the USSR more am were launched per year and we boast about it ?!

      Roughly speaking and honestly speaking, not a single country, even the USSR, had a rescued crew in full force at the start. And this is not bull gum for you. The Americans hung their shuttles on carnations almost and so far irrevocably
      1. +5
        9 February 2023 19: 16
        Quote: Tusv
        Rough and honest not a single country, even the USSR there was no rescued crew in full force at the start.

        April 5, 1975 - Soyuz-18-1

        At the 261st second of the flight, when the separation of the second stage of the rocket was supposed to occur, this did not happen, and the rocket began to rock. The automatic system for separating the reentry vehicle from the rocket worked. During the descent, the astronauts experienced a peak overload of 20 g (according to other sources - 21,3 g and even 26 g). The device landed to the south-west of the city of Gorno-Altaisk, at an altitude of 1200 m on the snow-covered slope of Mount Teremok-3. Cosmonauts Vasily Lazarev and Oleg Makarov were rescued, however, as it turned out later, Lazarev's health suffered quite a lot due to heavy overloads.

        September 26, 1983 - Soyuz T-10-1

        The explosion of the launch vehicle on the launch pad. There were no casualties during the accident. The pyro-locks worked, and the descent vehicle rushed away from the rocket, which fell apart 2 seconds after firing, falling down into the pit of the launch pad. During four seconds of operation of the SAS solid-propellant engines, cosmonauts Vladimir Titov and Gennady Strekalov experienced overloads from 14 to 18 g without health consequences, rising to a height of 650 meters and then by inertia up to 950 meters, where the parachute opened. After 5 minutes, the descent vehicle with the astronauts landed four kilometers from the accident site. As of 2018, this is the only time that the CAC propulsion system on the head fairing has been activated to rescue the crew.
    5. +2
      9 February 2023 19: 26
      launched more in the USSR per year

      first of all, wrong comparison.
      then space was the cutting edge of science and the most high-tech, and interest in it was high,
      now interest in space has decreased significantly, and not only here, in the United States too
      and engineers are now mostly in the IT field, and not in space

      secondly, in the USSR, the entire economy worked for space to the detriment of the civilian sphere, are you ready to go to the store for bread on cards and stand in line for 3 hours, if only there were as many rocket launches as in the USSR?
      1. 0
        10 February 2023 09: 40
        When did you buy bread on cards in the USSR, nonsense? In 1948?
  3. -3
    9 February 2023 16: 49
    If you don't know that comrade Elon Musk launches one rocket each every week, then the result of Roscosmos is good. Yes
    1. +2
      9 February 2023 16: 54
      Quote: voyaka uh
      If you don't know that comrade Elon Musk launches one rocket every week,


      And how many of them are successful? Ask before bragging here.
      1. +1
        9 February 2023 17: 04
        Quote: Carat
        Quote: voyaka uh
        If you don't know that comrade Elon Musk launches one rocket every week,


        And how many of them are successful? Ask before bragging here.

        Number of launches
        202FT: 182v1.1: 15v1.0: 5
        • successful
        200FT: 182v1.1: 14v1.0: 4
        • failed 1 (v1.1, CRS-7)
        • partially
        failed 1 (v1.0, CRS-1)

        200 completely successful out of 202 launches winked
        1. -1
          9 February 2023 17: 07
          18 failed. out of 200. And here 100 out of 100 are successful.
          1. 0
            9 February 2023 17: 11
            Quote: Carat
            18 failed. out of 200. And here 100 out of 100 are successful.

            Where did you get the number 18 from? Only 1 failure, and one partially successful (The main load successfully flew away, only small side satellites were lost)
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. +1
              9 February 2023 19: 09
              This is the official version. In the press slipped messages repeatedly about the failures. And the load is not the same.
              1. -1
                9 February 2023 22: 07
                What failures? Will there be proofs?

                And what is the load problem if the lion's share of customers ran to the mask?
          2. -2
            9 February 2023 22: 05
            So the bottle has 9 even more, 179 successful launches in a row
    2. +9
      9 February 2023 16: 57
      25 launches a year is one in two weeks. Considering the output mass, this is an excellent result.
    3. +7
      9 February 2023 16: 58
      Not Elon Musk, but NASA, and the result of this is shameless dumping, which NASA admitted, they say, the launches were below commercial cost.
      So these numbers from NASA are a flimsy letter. By the way, how are things going with Ryaptor engines? Shitty, still? Aya-yay-yay, 11 years "have almost done everything." How about Starliner? Already flying? And yes, what about accidents? Shitty again? Yes, these are not songs for you to sing about the "free" market
      1. -2
        9 February 2023 17: 05
        Quote from Bingo
        Not Elon Musk, but NASA, and the result of this is shameless dumping, which NASA admitted, they say, the launches were below commercial cost.
        So these numbers from NASA are a flimsy letter. By the way, how are things going with Ryaptor engines? Shitty, still? Aya-yay-yay, 11 years "have almost done everything." How about Starliner? Already flying? And yes, what about accidents? Shitty again? Yes, these are not songs for you to sing about the "free" market

        Falcon-9 has the lowest accident rate.
        NASA did not recognize any such thing.
      2. -2
        9 February 2023 22: 10
        And where did NASA write about this dumping?
        If space launched an ixpe device for them for 57 lamas?

        With the raptor, everyone is testing perfectly, like all other engines, they don’t want a repetition of the n1 and its nk15.

        So the Starliner is a Boeing, the mask dragon flies beautifully, and at the end of February it will launch the second Russian cosmonaut
    4. +8
      9 February 2023 17: 03
      If you don't know...

      And if you compare Internet satellites with a cargo of 2,5 tons .... You can also compare fireworks rockets for Christmas and Independence Day with the launch of cargo ships.
    5. 0
      9 February 2023 17: 09
      Quote: voyaka uh
      If you don't know that comrade Elon Musk launches one rocket each every week, then the result of Roscosmos is good. Yes


      By the way, how many rockets has Israel launched into space? And then you are used to showing off someone else's long member. Ukraine will soon catch up with this indicator.
    6. 0
      9 February 2023 17: 57
      Quote: voyaka uh
      If you don’t know that comrade Elon Musk launches one rocket every week, then the result of Roscosmos is good

      Elon is a simple private corporation. To the United States, only belonging to a citizen of this country. It is probably more correct to measure members between NASA and Roskosmos. Roscosmos has a small advantage over NASA. But both lose to China. For the public sector outright
    7. -2
      10 February 2023 04: 50
      Better tell us about the lunar Jewish tractor, or, apart from the genocide of the Arabs, can your hands do nothing else?
  4. +2
    9 February 2023 16: 49
    Congratulations Roscosmos.
    Question for connoisseurs, is there any open data, how much does it cost to withdraw a ton from different countries (companies)?
    1. +4
      9 February 2023 16: 59
      Quote: Mitroha
      is there open data how much does it cost to withdraw a ton from different countries (companies)

      Even if there is, this is a fiction, NASA themselves admitted that they allegedly paid for the commercial launches of the Falcons from the budget, which made it possible to yell that they are cheaper than in the Russian Federation)))
      1. -2
        9 February 2023 17: 06
        Quote from Bingo
        Quote: Mitroha
        is there open data how much does it cost to withdraw a ton from different countries (companies)

        Even if there is, this is a fiction, NASA themselves admitted that they allegedly paid for the commercial launches of the Falcons from the budget, which made it possible to yell that they are cheaper than in the Russian Federation)))

        Didn't acknowledge.
        1. -1
          10 February 2023 04: 52
          Just because they don't recognize it doesn't mean they don't. Anglo-Saxons are gentlemen))))
        2. 0
          10 February 2023 10: 34
          Quote: BlackMokona
          Didn't acknowledge.

          Not tired of lying?
          The American space agency admitted that it carried out space launches at a loss.

          The prices did not reflect the real value of the costs. Launches are many times more expensive than previously announced. All losses were compensated, for the sake of promoting launches, from their spaceports. Since February 25, NASA has been setting real prices for flights to the ISS.

          The corresponding statement with the new prices was published on the official website of NASA:

          Pricing since June 2019 has not reflected full cost recovery for NASA resources; it was intended to stimulate the market and was planned to be corrected.

          ...and increased prices 7 times.
          Walk, sect
          1. 0
            11 February 2023 10: 59
            Quote from Bingo
            Quote: BlackMokona
            Didn't acknowledge.

            Not tired of lying?
            The American space agency admitted that it carried out space launches at a loss.

            The prices did not reflect the real value of the costs. Launches are many times more expensive than previously announced. All losses were compensated, for the sake of promoting launches, from their spaceports. Since February 25, NASA has been setting real prices for flights to the ISS.

            The corresponding statement with the new prices was published on the official website of NASA:

            Pricing since June 2019 has not reflected full cost recovery for NASA resources; it was intended to stimulate the market and was planned to be corrected.

            ...and increased prices 7 times.
            Walk, sect

            wassat Now read what NASA wrote about. It was reselling space in cargo Dragons for commercial use by third parties. It has nothing to do with SpaceX. hi
            They always buy a full launch from SpaceX, you can't buy a partial launch there. Therefore, we stop lying and spreading the idiocy of journalists
      2. -3
        9 February 2023 22: 12
        Where did they admit it? Where do such fantasies come from, from Yandex Zen?
  5. +3
    9 February 2023 16: 50
    100 flawless launches. good That's what Khokhloma life-giving painting does .... lol (c) based on the imperishable

    Threat Everything, I’m silent, I’m silent .... They’re stammering right now ...
  6. 0
    9 February 2023 16: 56
    And how much did the Americans run on our engines, without after-sales service?
  7. -4
    9 February 2023 17: 05
    does RosCosmos want to say anything about the total dominance of NATO satellite intelligence?
    1. +2
      9 February 2023 19: 11
      Quote: Nikolay310
      Does RosCosmos want to say anything about the total dominance of NATO satellite intelligence?

      How are pigs different from others? Those who like to throw shit on, they don’t see existence without it.
      By the way, tell me, what does Roskosmos have to do with the dominance of NATO intelligence in space, according to your version? If Roskosmos is just an executor?
    2. -2
      10 February 2023 04: 54
      Tell us and we will listen. Apparently you have information from the General Staff of NATO and the Russian Federation))))
  8. +8
    9 February 2023 17: 05
    Quote: Crown without virus
    Since October 2018...

    Roughly - for 4 years with a penny of 25 launches only ... in the USSR they launched more per year am and we brag about it? am am am

    Yes, it is clear that it is not in your rules to be proud of the achievements and successes of the country in general. The fan is everything. Such is the essence of the local so-called "liberals".
    1. -9
      9 February 2023 17: 27
      Quote: Tagan
      Quote: Crown without virus
      Since October 2018...

      Roughly - for 4 years with a penny of 25 launches only ... in the USSR they launched more per year am and we brag about it? am am am

      Yes, it is clear that it is not in your rules to be proud of the achievements and successes of the country in general. The fan is everything. Such is the essence of the local so-called "liberals".

      For the first time I found out that I am a liberal laughing lol tongue
      And I thought that I was a PATRIOT of Russia to the marrow of my bones good
      1. -2
        10 February 2023 04: 56
        Patriot, this is not a language to talk and blame the power. And to work so that your Motherland is ahead of the rest. The question is, what are you doing, patriot?
  9. +8
    9 February 2023 17: 08
    89 launches out of 100 during the leadership of Roskosmos by Rogozin
    1. +5
      9 February 2023 17: 18
      Yes Yes Yes. Comrade Rogozin is to blame for all this disgrace. hi
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. -5
    9 February 2023 18: 27
    Roskosmos completed one hundred successful launches of space rockets in a row

    what
    What is considered successful?
    How many cancellations were there for technical reasons during the same time?
    And the story of MLM "Nauka" is extremely embarrassing... request
    1. +1
      10 February 2023 14: 02
      Quote: Yves762
      What is considered successful?


      Launches are when the rocket has fully worked out. Launches are when the payload has successfully exited and started running its program. Here, almost everything coincided in numbers, with a few exceptions - in one of the launches, the associated glass calibration ball Blitz-M did not separate, in the other, the upper stage with an inseparable main engine did not work out its program.

      Quote: Yves762
      How many cancellations were there for technical reasons during the same time?


      There were no cancellations, only postponements. All loads are gone.

      Quote: Yves762
      And the story of MLM "Nauka" is extremely embarrassing... request


      MLM-U has been a part of the ISS for more than a year, moreover, one more module is docked to it. What confuses you about this? laughing
  12. ASM
    +1
    9 February 2023 18: 33
    The fact that our mass-produced missiles are the most reliable in the world per unit of delivered cargo is excellent, but I would like to see more launches of promising vehicles. Let them not be so reliable, but it is impossible to bring the technique to mind without real application. But tomorrow / the day after tomorrow there will be a debugged machine, ready to take over.
  13. -4
    9 February 2023 19: 10
    If Korolev had risen from the grave, he would have been flattered that his 7s R-1950 was still flying, albeit under the name Soyuz-2.
    1. -4
      10 February 2023 04: 59
      Well then, the German Nazi Wernher von Braun, should be flattered by the vial? Well, and accordingly, all Americans are grateful to the USSR / RF for providing powerful engines that they themselves could not develop. And yes, you can start fairy tales about flying to the moon)))
      1. 0
        10 February 2023 07: 10
        And shuttles are fairy tales, yeah
        Where did you get out, caveman?
    2. 0
      18 February 2023 11: 27
      Quote: Nagan
      If Korolev had risen from the grave, he would have been flattered that his 7s R-1950 was still flying, albeit under the name Soyuz-2.

      If a person is a GENIUS, then his creations become CLASSICS wink
  14. 0
    9 February 2023 19: 36
    Quote: Crown without virus

    And I thought that I was a PATRIOT of Russia to the marrow of my bones good

    Uh-huh, something like a "Berlin patient", only smaller.)) I learned only how to hate the Motherland.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"