President of Ukraine Zelensky said that the Minsk agreements were a concession to Russia

27
President of Ukraine Zelensky said that the Minsk agreements were a concession to Russia

President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Minsk agreements concluded in 2015 could not contribute to the settlement of the armed conflict in Donbass and were a concession to Russia.

In an interview with the French edition of Le Figaro, Zelensky said that the agreements concluded in Minsk did not mention the issue of Crimea in any way. According to the Ukrainian president, when he tried to raise the issue of Crimea in a conversation with European partners, they replied that this issue was inappropriate and untimely. Zelensky was never given the opportunity to talk about Crimea during the Normandy talks, adding that he believes this was a deliberate mistake that no one was looking to correct.



According to Zelensky, he repeatedly raised this issue during his conversations with former German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron and tried to convince them of the impossibility of implementing the Minsk agreements in their current form.

Earlier, Merkel and Macron said that the Minsk agreements were nothing more than a ploy designed to give Ukraine time to strengthen its army. Since their signing, the Ukrainian side has not taken a single step towards the implementation of these agreements.

The Minsk agreements were concluded in 2015. The parties to the agreements were Ukraine and the then unrecognized republics of Donbass. Germany, France (on the part of Ukraine) and Russia (on the part of the LPR and DPR) acted as guarantors of their observance.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    February 9 2023
    but I remember when Zelya came in prezik at the elections, he said that he would kneel even to stop the war in the DPR and LPR! how they all change their shoes and deceived the Russian Federation!
    1. +4
      February 9 2023
      deceived RF

      the fact that they deceived the Russian Federation is sacred to them, but the fact that they deceived their own people, who hoped for a peaceful solution in the Donbass, is super-impudence
    2. +2
      February 9 2023
      "they all change shoes" so this is a "sports discipline" like this: running, pole vaulting,
    3. +4
      February 9 2023
      Quote: opuonmed
      but I remember when Zelya came in prezik at the elections, he said that he would kneel even to stop the war in the DPR and LPR! how they all change their shoes and deceived the Russian Federation!

      And I remember how in August 2014 this bloody jester spoke to the Nazis and the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Donbass and called the Donbass militias scum, wanting them to be destroyed.
      Those who have not forgotten this did not vote for this scum from the 2020th quarter in 95.
    4. old
      +3
      February 9 2023
      but I remember when Zelya came in prezik at the elections, he said that he would kneel even to stop the war in the DPR and LPR!

      And I remember how he suppressed laughter during Putin's speech at the signing ceremony of the Minsk agreements. He might still be funny though.
  2. +1
    February 9 2023
    Zelensky:
    ... The Minsk agreements were a concession to Russia

    Even now this clown is in his theater. These agreements (Minsk) were a gigantic deception to the leadership of Russia. Unfortunately, this leadership believed in these agreements, including the GDP. In a chess game, this is called checkmate.
    1. +4
      February 9 2023
      Quote: Evgenijus
      Zelensky:
      ... The Minsk agreements were a concession to Russia

      Even now this clown is in his theater. These agreements (Minsk) were a gigantic deception to the leadership of Russia. Unfortunately, this leadership believed in these agreements, including the GDP. In a chess game, this is called checkmate.

      You know smart guy, even a bad peace is better than war. And if there was even a ghostly chance to avoid war, it was necessary to use it. To do this, Putin announced advances in military technology in 2018, believing that this could stop the West from direct confrontation. It did not work out, well, war is war, as they say. You yourself have chosen this path.
  3. +4
    February 9 2023
    And I remember how many sanctions against Russia they imposed for allegedly not fulfilling these Minsk agreements
  4. +3
    February 9 2023
    The Kremlin does not get tired of walking on a rake - Minsk did not have time to end in disgrace, as the Kremlin again started the old hurdy-gurdy about "peace negotiations with dear Nazi partners without preconditions."

    If this happens and the mother of the Russian cities of Kyiv and the hero city of Odessa, all the primordially Russian lands between them are not liberated, if, as a result of the NWO, the Nazi Bandera regime remains in Kyiv and retains access to the Black Sea, we will be waiting in 3-5 years a new, much more bloody war with Nazi Ukraine rearmed to the teeth.
    1. 0
      February 9 2023
      Why does Russia need Kyiv? That's objectively. What's useful? I have not heard about unique industrial enterprises there, Antonov Design Bureau is hardly anything intelligible now. Yes, and for the sake of one design bureau, attaching an entire city ... isn’t it easier to take out documentation and specialists? The same goes for Odessa. We already have ports on the Black Sea, there are no special industrial enterprises for the sake of which one could get involved, there are no resources either.
      In general, the only benefit that I see from Ukraine after the NWO is a black hole for building materials, power equipment and various equipment. Provided that everything will be purchased only in Russia, even at the most draconian prices. Well, for this it is not necessary to join.
      For me, the whole Ukraine can roll like a sausage. There is no military infrastructure of the States or their puppets there - and nothing more is needed from it. He can sit in his hut, hate us and be poisoned by this hatred as much as he likes, until he poisons himself to death.
      1. +1
        February 9 2023
        Well, why did NATO need this Kyiv?
        To create threats to Russia, as Bush said?
        Then why not use it to repel NATO threats?
        1. 0
          February 9 2023
          The reflection of the threat to NATO is to ensure its non-appearance in Kyiv. We will not expel NATO from Europe as long as the United States is intact and is the world hegemon. And it is not necessary to fight against this in Europe. So take Ukraine out of the game for 30-50 years and switch to more important tasks.
  5. +4
    February 9 2023
    Why 30 years of our believe these nits I do not understand. Apparently it's about the money.
  6. +4
    February 9 2023
    Quote: Evgenijus
    Zelensky:
    ... The Minsk agreements were a concession to Russia

    Even now this clown is in his theater. These agreements (Minsk) were a gigantic deception to the leadership of Russia. Unfortunately, this leadership believed in these agreements, including the GDP. In a chess game, this is called checkmate.

    Dear "chess player", what about the words of the "guarantor" that he personally, literally "on his knee" drafted the text of these agreements? Who deceived whom? Himself, including us? sad
  7. +2
    February 9 2023
    Yes fu !!!..... On Ze ... even Frau Merkel admitted that this is a fiction ....
  8. +1
    February 9 2023
    So, the "talking shop" did not suit Kyiv either?
    It looks like Zelensky decided to "cry"
  9. +1
    February 9 2023
    Masters of changing shoes in the air provide material for reflection. Who will deal with you now, since you changed your mind three times in the evening
  10. +1
    February 9 2023
    The error in the article is apparently "According to Zelensky, he repeatedly raised this issue during communication with ex-Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel and former President of France Emmanuel Macron", maybe not Macron, but Francois Hollande. Macron is not yet a former president
  11. +2
    February 9 2023
    Another "deceiver" of GDP has hatched, as if something once depended on him and Poroshenko on the outskirts.
  12. +1
    February 9 2023
    President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Minsk agreements concluded in 2015 could not contribute to the settlement of the armed conflict in Donbass and were a concession to Russia.

    And if 404 had not made a concession to the Russian Federation, where would the rebel troops from the LDNR go next?
  13. +3
    February 9 2023
    were a concession to Russia
    Here it is as it turns out. Poroshenko "enjoying the victories" (boilers into which the Armed Forces of Ukraine fell) decided to make a concession to Russia, and subsequently Zelensky supported this? Dangles calmly around Europe, carries all sorts of nonsense, and at the same time, journalists listen to him with their mouths open and writing down every word. Well, there is no desire to even talk about the political dwarfs Macron and Scholz - worthless people, dumbfounded by their importance, by chance got into the highest positions.
  14. +1
    February 9 2023
    Well, actually, it was just a concession to Sumeria, a concession stupid and unnecessary
  15. 0
    February 9 2023
    Everyone pretends not to remember who created the Minsk agreements. Moreover, on the fifth day after the start of the operation, the Kremlin began to offer peace talks.
    Believe me, living in reality is easier than laughing at imaginary clowns and pretending that the regrouping is on another planet.
  16. -1
    February 9 2023
    Did he even live on earth at that moment? Or was he scouring his desk drawer looking for a new cocaine track - and missed everything?
    Concession... heh! A good concession - when Poproshenko was almost on his knees with frightened eyes, begging his masters to insist on a truce on any terms, and Merkel and Hollande were hanging in Putin's arms, so that only he would sign this "concession" from Ukraine :))) )))))))))
  17. 0
    February 9 2023
    According to the Ukrainian president, when he tried to raise the issue of Crimea in a conversation with European partners, they replied that this issue was inappropriate and untimely.
    Only the states need the return of Crimea to Ukraine, and only for that. to occupy it. Set up bases of all stripes there, threaten Russia and control their European satellites. Germany and France don't need it. Therefore, they did not focus on the peninsula.
    And now the war is being waged mainly for taking the peninsula from Russia. Whoever owns the Crimea controls both Southern Europe and the Caucasus and Turkey, if anything.
  18. -1
    February 9 2023
    A concession is when you voluntarily give in, and then there was a catastrophe of an operational scale, what is he trying to say? Well, it was like a boxer talking about a missed hook, it was a concession.
  19. 0
    February 11 2023
    and former French President Emmanuel Macron. What a powerful Svetlyshev. He took and demoted Macron.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"