Institute for the Study of War: Russian troops do not have enough "combat power" for a large-scale offensive

100
Institute for the Study of War: Russian troops do not have enough "combat power" for a large-scale offensive

The Russian army will not have enough "combat power" to carry out a large-scale offensive in the planned time frame. This is the conclusion of an American think tank, also called the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).

American analysts believe that Russian troops will not be able to launch a large-scale offensive as scheduled, because they do not have sufficient "combat power." It is stated that the Russian command is allegedly in a hurry, therefore, it will begin large-scale actions with insufficient forces, and this will lead to the failure of all plans. Thus, it is concluded that there will be no liberation of Donbass in the near future.



However, American experts draw their conclusions based on the information provided by Kyiv, and most of it is unreliable or fake. Firstly, the Russian command did not name any dates for the start of the offensive, and secondly, Moscow did not say anything at all about any offensive operation, everything was limited to statements that the NWO would continue.

It turns out that Kyiv, together with Western sponsors, came up with a horror story about a "large-scale offensive" of the Russian army, itself called the terms and now refutes them, dragging Russia into this.

Meanwhile, it may turn out that this most "large-scale" offensive of the Russian army has already begun, it's just that no one is announcing it. Ours are now attacking along the entire line of contact, feeling for weaknesses and forcing the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to bring into battle reserves transferred from one sector to another. It is quite possible that a breakthrough in one of the sectors will be the beginning of the offensive. And the transfer of reserves and new equipment to the front line from our side did not stop.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    100 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +30
      8 February 2023 13: 17
      Dear editors, do not publish here the nonsense of this American office!
      1. +2
        8 February 2023 13: 19
        According to Arestovich, a half-million group is preparing for an offensive.
        “They are probing our front, looking for weak points, where are the future points of attack, where it will be necessary to invest efforts that are now in the rear. Those notorious 200 that General Zaluzhny spoke about.

        Now there are about 330 thousand Russian troops on the territory of Ukraine and about 150 thousand along the perimeter. This exceeds the invasion group, they invaded by 330 thousand, somewhere already by 150-200 thousand. Part of the Russian troops is still being trained at the training grounds,” Arestovich said.

        https://www.politnavigator.net/arestovich-nachalos-rossijjskoe-nastuplenie-ikh-bolshe-chem-gruppirovka-vtorzheniya.html
        1. +3
          8 February 2023 13: 53
          According to Arestovich

          You yourself are not funny already from this one "according to Arestovich". This is the last mouth that could be trusted. There is no place to put the sticker.
          1. +3
            8 February 2023 16: 52
            American analysts believe that Russian troops will not be able to launch a large-scale offensive as scheduled

            That is, they themselves set the dates for our offensive, and now they themselves are saying that we will not be able to. Yes
            1. -1
              9 February 2023 09: 08
              The article is so-so, but there are many who want to procrastinate on the topic ...
              Especially those who make predictions, like that council of Pinocchio doctors: "the patient is more alive than dead ... the patient is more dead than alive ... the patient is either alive or dead"
              And the offensive is already on the sly, slowly but surely.
        2. +7
          8 February 2023 13: 56
          Quote from Orange Bigg
          According to Arestovich, a half-million group is preparing for an offensive.

          Shall we refer to all the words of Arrestovich or only to those that we like?
        3. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        8 February 2023 13: 23
        The name of the office is right in the title of the article. If you don't like it, just don't read it.
        1. +4
          8 February 2023 16: 18
          It is not worth brushing aside the opinion of intelligence agencies.
      3. +6
        8 February 2023 13: 29
        We need a two-sided opinion for objectivity
        1. +3
          8 February 2023 13: 52
          Specially climbed into Wiki to read about this office. "The Institute for the Study of War conducts research in the field of defense and international affairs. Operates on grants and donations from major defense contractors, including Raytheon, General Dynamics, DynCorp and others[2]" Therefore, the forecasts of these experts on the value are zero. Maintenance of commercial structures that produce weapons, no more. The analysis is done based on the results of the military conflict, below, Uprun's colleague gave a very good description of this structure.
          1. +2
            9 February 2023 07: 26
            On the wiki, you can only use purely technical articles, everything that concerns politics or the politicians themselves, history and society as a whole is bullshit biased by the West, which has nothing to do with reality, so do not shame yourself here by referring to the wiki.
      4. +6
        8 February 2023 14: 04
        And when will the bell come back?
      5. +6
        8 February 2023 14: 07
        Quote: AlexGa
        Dear editors, do not publish here the nonsense of this American office!

        This American office has the main purpose of draining slops.
        It is surprising that she is constantly quoted at VO.
      6. The comment was deleted.
    2. -7
      8 February 2023 13: 18
      Wangyu - after the end of the NWO, her example, when in fact the Limited Group of Russian Forces achieved all the stated goals, will be studied for decades by all the armies of the world good
      1. +19
        8 February 2023 13: 26
        Quote: Expert2023
        Wangyu - after the end of the NWO, her example, when in fact the Limited Group of Russian Forces achieved all the stated goals, will be studied for decades by all the armies of the world good

        It is not necessary for all the armies to study ... We would at least study our mistakes ourselves.
        Regarding the "declared goals" ... The goals were repeatedly stated different, then they were re-declared, and again they were refuted ... So with the goals - a complete disaster.
        If we take at least the liberation of Donbass as a goal, then yes ... By the end of this year, this is possible. But something more is extremely doubtful, unfortunately.
        1. +1
          9 February 2023 07: 30
          Of course, there is a problem with forecasts when they predict to fight with the outskirts, but they are at war with the whole West. Plus, our mobilized still can not get rid of softness. You see the enemy - pull the trigger, otherwise he will pull first!
      2. +28
        8 February 2023 13: 30
        will study for decades all the armies of the world


        Uh-huh... Especially the shame of spring 2022. "How to please Russian businessmen and residents of Donbass at the same time." A country with a fivefold superiority of the population, an army with a nuclear triad, industry has been marking time for the second year. This should be included in textbooks. And next to the US operation in Iraq.
        When Putin said "We haven't started yet", he should have continued "and we're not going to".
        1. 0
          8 February 2023 15: 29
          Quote: dauria
          And next to the US operation in Iraq.

          Yes, compared to how the Americans rolled Iraq into a thin pancake in a short time, our NWO is a real shame for a great country
          1. +2
            9 February 2023 07: 23
            Will there be more examples? There, the bombing of Belgrade, for example ...
          2. 0
            9 February 2023 12: 51
            Why not? It is obvious that Ukraine is conducting combat operations on all conditionally free imported, and is also fully provided with communications and all types of NATO intelligence, including space. And what did besieged Iraq use?
            1. 0
              9 February 2023 17: 01
              Well, the States didn’t do such garbage as we do in the NWO.
      3. +5
        8 February 2023 13: 44
        will study for decades all the armies of the world good

        Everything is studied in military academies - both successes and failures.
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. +2
        8 February 2023 14: 21
        In any case, CBO will be studied for decades in all specialized educational institutions. This is the largest armed conflict in almost 3/4 century.
      6. +2
        8 February 2023 15: 26
        Quote: Expert2023
        in fact, a limited group of Russian troops achieved all the stated goals

        This limited group is the entire Russian army. There is nothing more to scrape together without the mobilization or participation of conscript boys.
    3. +19
      8 February 2023 13: 18
      Not being an employee of the Institute for the Study of War, I will allow myself to predict 3 options. There will be no offensive, there will be an offensive, but it will not be crowned with success, the offensive will be and will be crowned with success. In my opinion, it is difficult not to agree with a realistic forecast.
      1. +4
        8 February 2023 13: 25
        Well, there is at least one more option-the offensive ukrov.
        1. +1
          8 February 2023 13: 55
          Your option corresponds to paragraph 1 or 2 of the earlier forecast.
      2. +3
        8 February 2023 13: 51
        they forgot the 4th option: a negative offensive according to plan and ahead of schedule
    4. +3
      8 February 2023 13: 20
      The situation on the front line in the LPR is very difficult. The Ukrainian side has pulled enough forces to the line of contact to counterattack. I wonder if they are allowed to create groups, why
      1. -2
        8 February 2023 13: 38
        The main thing is that these are the last forces of Ukraine
        1. +2
          8 February 2023 14: 22
          For the mobile potential of one of the largest countries in Europe, such hopes look extremely naive
    5. +3
      8 February 2023 13: 21
      Quote from andray
      The situation on the front line in the LPR is very difficult. The Ukrainian side has pulled enough forces to the line of contact to counterattack. I wonder if they are allowed to create groups, why


      The answer is very obvious - they are lured from large cities to the ,, field ,, stop
      1. +3
        8 February 2023 13: 38
        Perhaps. But in fact, the following is happening.
        1. -1
          8 February 2023 13: 45
          Quote from: dmi.pris1
          And about the "luring", but where did we get it?

          Artemovsk, Soledar - it's just obvious. The most combat-ready were thrown there and they were killed very stupidly. Just imagine how they would have to be picked out in Kharkov, where, due to high-rise buildings, even MLRS cannot be used? Will they all fly to skyscrapers, and not on purpose?
          1. +6
            8 February 2023 13: 52
            Artemovsa, Soledar ???!! Vsuki went into the field and took the fight, or what? They settled in residential buildings, enterprises .. You understand about 'luring in the field'. And about Kharkov this is a separate 'song'. that Kharkov has already been taken .. belayThey killed everyone stupidly, which is also very debatable. An enemy equal in strength to us, in addition, settled in fortifications and buildings.
            1. -2
              8 February 2023 14: 21
              Quote from: dmi.pris1
              went into the field and took the fight, or what? They settled in residential buildings, enterprises ..

              They settled in the fortification, and not in residential areas where there were no residents left. Of course, it was ideal for them to go to the beach at all, where they could not dig in - but this is a utopia. Once again - in Soledar it worked out to apply art, in Kharkov it would not work. And the VSUK was killed with artillery, and not with skirmishes in urban battles, as it would have been in a millionaire
          2. +2
            8 February 2023 13: 53
            Shoigu recently stated that 6,5 ukrovoyaks were destroyed in the ENTIRE January ... on the scale of the Ukrainian army and its mercenaries, this is a drop in the ocean ... therefore, even based on Shoigu's data, we can conclude that no luring by saltar occurred
          3. -1
            8 February 2023 13: 58
            Quote from Bingo
            Just imagine how they would have to be picked out in Kharkov


            just like in Mariupol ... which, of course, is smaller than Kharkov, but much larger than Soledar and Artyomovsk ... by the way, they took Mariupol faster than Artyomovsk and even without Wagner ... it’s another matter that the best groups of marines and NM DNR.
            1. +5
              8 February 2023 14: 09
              Now there is not a word about Kharkov and everything else. On the contrary, at the end of last year, the Supreme Commander broke out about the goal of freeing the DPR. sanatoriums and what will happen to them further they don’t know yet. I talked with them in Gelendzhik.
            2. +6
              8 February 2023 14: 16
              Mariupol was surrounded on the move. And then they just couldn't get through. And even so, we stormed it for almost 2 months.
            3. -1
              8 February 2023 14: 25
              In Mariupol, in addition to losses, they fought for a long time, despite the fact that they were immediately cut off from help. Moreover, the task was to protect the peacekeepers - hence the losses. And in Artemovsk, they were simply methodically destroyed with artillery, there were no such assaults as in Marik, - Wagner cleaned up the infantry crushed by artillery - this, of course, is fucking as hard, but not swotting like in Marik, where Ukrainian equipment cut through the streets in fucking quantities - they didn’t go to Artemivs anymore, because it’s not Marik - if they find it, they’ll immediately grind it with artillery
          4. +6
            8 February 2023 14: 27
            Colleague, where did you hear this???
            Do you know how rotation is going on, training with the enemy, what is the state of personnel and logistics?
            Do you yourself understand that you are working to underestimate the enemy, which means you are provoking unnecessary sacrifices from our side?
            In no case should you assume that you will now have untrained, poorly armed people in front of you and you can now throw hats on them.
            It is already simply obvious that every meter will have to be gnawed out both in Kharkov and in an ordinary farm. A motivated, trained and able to fight enemy.
            And what you write is really just some kind of sabotage after almost a year of NWO.
            1. -5
              8 February 2023 15: 20
              Colleague, if shelled units are laid down, under no rotation can they be born. And if they have ALREADY laid down in Soledar, they will not be in Kharkov under any underestimation of the enemy. And they won't be there.
              What has been done does not mean that our hunger will squat with songs. But to deny the obvious downsizing of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Artomovsk and Soledar is not an underestimation of our own army, but clinical idiocy, colleague ...
    6. +9
      8 February 2023 13: 21
      Yes, they are all correct. Everyone is now waiting for the spring company and wondering how it can proceed in general. Russia has mobilized and by today the mobilized are already ready en masse. Another question is whether they will be enough for something other than plugging holes, holding the phoron line, and slowly advancing in separate areas? If it doesn’t hawt, then there will be no victory in the NWO in the foreseeable future. Ukraine, on the other hand, is also preparing huge reserves, the question is how they will show themselves in action and what it will all result in.
    7. 0
      8 February 2023 13: 24
      It seems that the "Institute for the Study of War" took Lesha Arestovich as an expert.
    8. 0
      8 February 2023 13: 24
      Somehow I don't understand them. Previously, the installation was clear - the Armed Forces of Ukraine will win, and of course with the help of the West. Then, in the Western media, fueled by Ukrainian "sources", there was talk about the inevitability of the Russian offensive and the timing of its start. They have already begun to talk about the "Korean version" of the end of the war. And suddenly the "Institute for the Study of War" pops up again and on a grand scale disavows previous disputes
      The Russian army does not have enough "combat power" to carry out a large-scale offensive
      Is it that new hopes in connection with the promised deliveries of tanks and missiles?
      1. +1
        8 February 2023 13: 27
        Previously, the installation was clear - the Armed Forces of Ukraine will win and, of course, with the help of the West

        I do not remember such a message from this "institute". They deliver relatively normal analytics, just like our military bloggers.
        1. -1
          8 February 2023 13: 54
          You carefully read my comment, at the beginning of which I talk about what was said in the United States and Europe, and only then
          And suddenly the "Institute for the Study of War" pops up again and with a flourish disavows previous disputes
          1. 0
            8 February 2023 15: 19
            Yes, carefully. You made a logically incorrect generalization in your comment, lumping together everything that was said in the USA and Europe and passing it off as a single point of view, to which you have some strange questions about its inconsistency. And how, in principle, can information pulled from different sources be consistent, and even over a long period of time? Only a collective generalized "porridge" can reign in the collective consciousness. Nothing else. And yes, this mess will naturally fluctuate in different directions under the influence of the "information field". What is surprising and worthy of discussion here? However, this cannot cast any shadow on the opinion of a particular "institute".
    9. +3
      8 February 2023 13: 27
      Russia has a mobilization potential of 30 million soldiers ... plus a good military-industrial complex, there are all natural resources ... I am absolutely confident in the victory of our country in a long-term conflict.
      Yes, it will be hard ... that’s what war is for ... it doesn’t happen easily ... but with strong political will and the support of the people, Russia can and must defeat the Armed Forces of Ukraine ... even despite the support of the Ukronazis by the West ... I believe in our victory... smile to spite all the haters.
      1. +6
        8 February 2023 13: 31
        Here I support, in the long run we will win, but the problem is that the collapse of the state (as in 1917) can happen before we win.
        1. +1
          8 February 2023 14: 02
          Study MLF .... the revolutionary situation is when ......., we still went through this at school.
          1. +2
            8 February 2023 14: 20
            Yes. "The tops can't, but the bottoms don't want to." An unsuccessful war, a crisis in the country and the economy. There, too, people are not stupid and try to reduce everything to this. And they also know how to play for a long time, supporting the flame of war. We then, ordinary people can do it, but I’m not sure about our leadership. They have something to lose
      2. +1
        8 February 2023 13: 44
        Russia has a mobilization potential of 30 million soldiers.

        Do you want to throw this resource into the "last and decisive battle"? And who then will live and work? It is necessary to somehow save this "resource", otherwise there will be no one to celebrate the victory.
      3. +6
        8 February 2023 13: 55
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        Russia has a mobilization potential of 30 million soldiers ... plus a good military-industrial complex, there are all natural resources ... I am absolutely confident in the victory of our country in a long-term conflict.
        Yes, it will be hard ... that’s what war is for ... it doesn’t happen easily ... but with strong political will and the support of the people, Russia can and must defeat the Armed Forces of Ukraine ... even despite the support of the Ukronazis by the West ... I believe in our victory... smile to spite all the haters.

        30 million was in the USSR.
        Now 20-21 million.
        But as in the Second World War, teenagers and women will have to be put on the machines.
        Relatively painlessly, you can call 2-3 million.
        But is there anything to fully provide them with?
        But this is unlikely, judging by how 300 thousand were equipped by the whole world.
        1. +4
          8 February 2023 14: 24
          Yes, and now we are equipping it. The niece of the SNF has already traveled 3 times targeted, transported Mavika's medicines and handed over products to hospitals. Went 4 times today. all the people bear
        2. +3
          8 February 2023 14: 25
          So we continue to equip, in schools, educational institutions. We collect parcels, products, soap and water, warm up and hide .. We collected medicines once, but it was worse than some kind of sur ... Bring ANY antibiotics ..
        3. +1
          8 February 2023 15: 23
          But is there anything to fully provide them with?
          But this is unlikely, judging by how 300 thousand were equipped by the whole world.

          This is likely to be the biggest limiting factor. It was exactly the same in Ukraine in 2014-15. It is very likely that the next "wave" will be better than the previous one, because the system is somehow still learning. Again, something like this happened in Ukraine.
      4. +3
        8 February 2023 14: 04
        And if the military-industrial complex is not able to make up for even the current losses in Ukraine, is this why the West is dragging out the conflict so that there is nothing to fight with? Mobilization will not help then.
      5. +5
        8 February 2023 14: 05
        with strong political will

        I believe in our Victory...

        Do you also believe in the presence of a strong political will? This is after a year of tail wagging .... Yes, only the blind will not see that the only dream is to return to the position "before the war" and not to be heavily sanded at the same time. Pay off, if possible without overpaying.
      6. +3
        8 February 2023 14: 06
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        but with strong political will


        excuse me, but where did you see a firm political will??? Yes, at least not solid, but simply political ...
      7. +4
        8 February 2023 14: 22
        Russia has a mobilization potential of 30 million soldiers ... plus a good military-industrial complex, there are all natural resources ... I am absolutely confident in the victory of our country in a long-term conflict.

        On the side of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the mob potential of Ukraine alone is about 10 million. Plus the mob potential of NATO countries with a population of approximately 1,5 billion
        Also, unlimited access to technologies and resources of almost the entire planet and the military-industrial complex of the strongest economy in the world (okay, I agree to the second one, but we are somewhere in 8-10th place) + EU + satellites.
        What did you say about the victory in a protracted war?
        1. +3
          8 February 2023 15: 40
          Quote: Single-n
          What did you say about the victory in a protracted war?

          The longer this war drags on, the further we are from victory. A quick victory could be expected in the first days and weeks of the NWO. When the enemy did not move away from the shock, we could demolish everything that is possible to hell with. Barracks, factories, warehouses and pile on all the strength and power. But the super stupid planning of the General Staff operation, and the lisp of our political leadership has led to the fact that we are now slurping a full spoon. And we eat something very smelly.
        2. 0
          8 February 2023 16: 52
          20 million!?
        3. +2
          9 February 2023 11: 15
          There is no such mob. potential in Ukraine. There is now a population of 25 million. Remove old women, children, sick lame blind. Plus, someone should stay in the rear to maintain transport, infrastructure, maintain law and order, maintain the financial system, and communal services. Ukraine is one of the oldest countries in Europe in terms of population, -250 thousand annually only due to natural decline. I think the human resource of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is already close to exhaustion. Otherwise, people would not be chased through the streets.
      8. The comment was deleted.
    10. -8
      8 February 2023 13: 32
      Quote: IgorIP
      Quote: Expert2023
      Wangyu - after the end of the NWO, her example, when in fact the Limited Group of Russian Forces achieved all the stated goals, will be studied for decades by all the armies of the world good

      It is not necessary for all the armies to study ... We would at least study our mistakes ourselves.
      Regarding the "declared goals" ... The goals were repeatedly stated different, then they were re-declared, and again they were refuted ... So with the goals - a complete disaster.
      If we take at least the liberation of Donbass as a goal, then yes ... By the end of this year, this is possible. But something more is extremely doubtful, unfortunately.


      The main and main goal of the NWO - the unification of 2 parts of one People into one Whole has long been identified good
    11. -7
      8 February 2023 13: 34
      Quote from Gpn27
      Here I support, in the long run we will win, but the problem is that the collapse of the state (as in 1917) can happen before we win.


      Everything will finally end by the beginning of the 25th year. There is not a single reason that Russia would be destroyed, now it will only grow stronger stop
      1. +2
        8 February 2023 14: 06
        Quote: Expert2023
        Quote from Gpn27
        Here I support, in the long run we will win, but the problem is that the collapse of the state (as in 1917) can happen before we win.


        Everything will finally end by the beginning of the 25th year. There is not a single reason that Russia would be destroyed, now it will only grow stronger stop

        I have a different opinion, given the political aspect.
        We must not forget that in the 2024th presidential election in Russia. And Putin needs to be re-elected.
        And it’s better to do this against the background of the Victory, and not against the background of vague events at the front
        In addition, the US elections and the Democrats must be defeated. In my opinion, the spring-summer of this year will be decisive.
        Otherwise, why was it necessary to call on more than 300 thousand and increase the army by another 120 thousand at the expense of contractors.
        Only in order to fix the front line and wait for Kyiv, with the help of the West, to form several strike groups?
        Something too small for the collected forces.
        1. +3
          8 February 2023 15: 42
          Quote: Ulan.1812
          Something too small for the collected forces.

          The collected forces are somehow small. If we cannot carry out large-scale operations with these forces.
          1. -1
            9 February 2023 17: 51
            Quote: Gritsa
            Quote: Ulan.1812
            Something too small for the collected forces.

            The collected forces are somehow small. If we cannot carry out large-scale operations with these forces.

            I am also of the opinion that such forces are not enough for large-scale operations.
            So they are not planned. Only local.
    12. +6
      8 February 2023 13: 34
      I completely agree with American analysts - the liberation of Donbass alone will not end the war, the situation will not change from 2014 - only new border towns and villages of the Russian Federation will be under shelling instead of Donetsk and Luhansk - Melitopol, Berdyansk, Kakhovka, Crimea. There will be no peaceful life in the returned territories if the Nazi regime in Kyiv continues and it retains access to the Black Sea.

      There can be only one solution to the Ukrainian question - the complete and final liquidation of the state of Ukraine on the native Russian lands.

      And for a full-scale offensive in Ukraine, a grouping of at least 2 million people in the NWO and at least a fivefold increase in combat units of the main classes is necessary.

      1. +5
        8 February 2023 14: 25
        Putin and the rest of the brethren have no such goal. Can't you see for yourself that they are sitting on two chairs, as they were sitting before. The beginning of the NWO did not change their ideology, and will not change it.
    13. -1
      8 February 2023 13: 36
      However, American experts draw their conclusions based on the information provided by Kyiv, and most of it is unreliable or fake. Firstly, the Russian command did not name any dates for the start of the offensive, and secondly, Moscow did not say anything at all about any offensive operation, everything was limited to statements that the NWO would continue.

      find someone to trust...

      Meanwhile, it may turn out that this most "large-scale" offensive of the Russian army has already begun, it's just that no one is announcing it. Ours are now attacking along the entire line of contact, feeling for weaknesses and forcing the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to bring into battle reserves transferred from one sector to another. It is quite possible that a breakthrough in one of the sectors will be the beginning of the offensive. And the transfer of reserves and new equipment to the front line from our side did not stop.


      but this message is more or less true ... who knows how it really is at the forefront and the plans of our Defense Ministry ....
    14. 0
      8 February 2023 13: 39
      Enough for your relics in abundance, do not write
    15. +1
      8 February 2023 13: 40
      However, American experts draw their conclusions based on information provided by Kyiv,

      We are told all the time that all NATO intelligence and all NATO + satellites are working for Kyiv, and all their operations are planned with the assistance of NATO generals and headquarters.
      You either put on your underpants or take off your crosses, pour them into our ears.
      1. -2
        8 February 2023 16: 40
        Quote: Stepan S
        You either put on your underpants or take off your crosses, pour them into our ears.

        Not at all :)). It does not interfere. Kyiv receives all the NATO intelligence data... but analyzes it itself: safely coming up with fantastic versions about the attack of the evil Russians. For example, if intelligence data showed how a field kitchen was jumping over bumps on a rockade, then some Syrsky or Budanov, in a fit of cocaine frenzy, immediately begin to yell about the "threat of an offensive by Russia." And if the American satellites spotted the field kitchen at the same time both in Kremennaya and near Energodar, then the highly analytical press service of the Armed Forces of Ukraine already predicts a "Russian offensive from two sides"
    16. +1
      8 February 2023 13: 42
      The Americans do not get their information from the Ukrainians, but from their reconnaissance satellites, who calculate the concentration of Russian equipment near the front.
    17. 0
      8 February 2023 13: 53
      American experts draw their conclusions based on the information provided by Kyiv, and most of it is unreliable or fake.

      What are these "experts" who believe the information provided by Kyiv. lol
    18. -1
      8 February 2023 13: 56
      The so-called "Institute for the Study of War" was created under the protectorate of the Clintons. Its goal is a systematic analysis of military operations for future wars with Russia. What gets into the public sphere can be stuffed, and what work is actually being done is little known to us. Regarding the offensive, there are opinions, including the notorious Strelkov, that we have few forces for a large-scale offensive. What will actually happen - we'll see. It remains to be hoped that the top military commanders have drawn conclusions from the failures of the past year and will not allow them to be repeated.
    19. +2
      8 February 2023 13: 59
      If an offensive is planned, then probably closer to the summer, when the brilliant green appears, respectively, a new wave of mobilization is needed for it (the one that was enough to stabilize the front and a slight advance, which is talked about a lot, but the success is very modest) presumably in March. But then again, if an offensive is planned, there is little mobilization, the mobilized must be provided with the necessary for modern warfare, and this is not only equipment and socks. we need modern means of communication, thermal imagers, night vision devices, quadrocopters, etc. those. high-tech tools, but where to get them? it is possible, of course, without all this, but then the loss count will be strongly not in our favor, and it will be much more difficult to conduct each next wave of mobilization than the previous one. But it won’t be possible to sit out on the defensive for a long time, because sooner or later long-range weapons will be supplied to Ukraine, including those capable of reaching Moscow, and then what ...
      1. -2
        8 February 2023 14: 26
        You carry nonsense! Everything is already planned for you
      2. +1
        8 February 2023 15: 45
        Quote from geodes
        If an offensive is planned, then probably closer to summer

        Yes, there will be no offensive - we do not have the strength for this.
      3. -2
        8 February 2023 18: 19
        Quote from geodes
        But it won’t be possible to sit out on the defensive for a long time, because sooner or later long-range weapons will be supplied to Ukraine, including those capable of reaching Moscow, and then what ...


        What nonsense.
        Ukraine may also be supplied with long-range weapons while we advance. And they will shoot our attackers from Lvov. And what?
    20. +2
      8 February 2023 14: 09
      Quote: Ulan.1812
      But this is unlikely, judging by how 300 thousand were equipped by the whole world.

      That's right ... I equipped my cousin, a mobilized artilleryman, with every little household item ... now he is in the NVO zone.
    21. 0
      8 February 2023 14: 20
      It would be nice to read the comments of people who have been in the war zone, and not couch experts of hat throwers.
    22. -2
      8 February 2023 14: 23
      And who said that there will be a large-scale offensive? This American office is broadcasting nonsense, and the military review is broadcasting it!
    23. -2
      8 February 2023 14: 24
      Military review you pour water on the mill of our enemies! You have to think with your head! Or you bought by the US State Department. You post any nonsense on the site
    24. -4
      8 February 2023 14: 31
      There is little real information, but there is such a hype one, like a horoscope when I get rich everyone wants to know, so here: all sorts of heads carried out mobilization on our TV, it’s about to start, it’s not in vain that they collected a runoff for the people, anticipating dill broadcast on our population that is waiting for tank throws (laziness study the mat part) that’s it, and then when it doesn’t happen, then there’s no power, then the invaders tore their ass but scared our military. Info space does not tolerate emptiness, unfortunately our propaganda is exaggerating all sorts of wunderwaffles and now we are dying. It is clear that something needs to be said, but there is nothing to say. It is possible to close all these programs and telegrams for a month, so that there would be no sucking out of the type of news from the finger. The war will be long, slow, attrition.
    25. 0
      8 February 2023 15: 25
      Russian troops in Ukraine liberate Ukrainians from the Ukronazis and the invasion of NATO mercenaries. Russian troops are picking these Ukronazis and mercenaries out of their hiding places and it's not fast. Of course, this is not the way NATO is used to: to bomb Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya indiscriminately, to drop bombs on Afghanistan for the sake of interest.
    26. 0
      8 February 2023 15: 53
      Institute for the Study of War: Russian troops do not have enough "combat power" for a large-scale offensive
      Does the US want to add power to us? feel
    27. -2
      8 February 2023 16: 32
      American analysts believe that Russian troops will not be able to launch a large-scale offensive as scheduled

      Damn ... analysts, so you and so! WHAT other predetermined dates? Who planned them? Where can I see these dates in the plans of the Russian General Staff?
      They themselves came up with some kind of deadlines - and you yourself deny the possibility of Russia meeting these deadlines!
      Went through this a year ago. Then they also came up with some mythical 36 hours within themselves to seize Ukraine - and carried it to the media ... and then - uuuu ... yes, Russia has broken off! I wanted to lose my Svloreich in 36 hours, but it wasn’t there ...
      These 36 hours you and have thought up, nerds! As now - for our General Staff you come up with the timing of the offensive ...
    28. +1
      8 February 2023 17: 34
      If there was power, they would already be in Kyiv, without regroupings. Experts do not explain the power of what exactly is missing
    29. 0
      8 February 2023 21: 04
      Who writes about shame. Do you immediately write captivity?
    30. The comment was deleted.
    31. +2
      9 February 2023 07: 38
      The Russian army does not need a large-scale offensive, it needs to destroy the maximum amount of enemy manpower. Why publish banal nonsense?
    32. The comment was deleted.
    33. The comment was deleted.
    34. 0
      9 February 2023 12: 53
      The real truth is Somewhere in the middle..
      Preparing half a million is BULLSHIT!
      Not have enough "combat power IS nonsense..! The only truth is RU need to Throttle military ACTIVITIES Otherwise they will face a lot of big problems!"
      You can tell hero stories and silence everyone, but you can also use your common sense
      Have a wonderful day!
    35. +1
      9 February 2023 13: 44
      The power of air strikes is definitely not enough. Things would have gone faster. But an air defense system is an air defense system.
    36. +1
      10 February 2023 07: 52
      mobilization of 300 thousand. man is a drop in the ocean. now these forces are being introduced for running-in and local "village" successes. there were no forces for a decisive counteroffensive, and no. the tops can’t decide to transfer their obscure own into the plane of a conventional war. With the necessary tension of the entire economy and the entire population ..... what if the deep people don’t understand? after all, they promised at first that we would observe victorious military operations only on TV. and then everything turned around...
      and the Ukrainian spring mud is coming soon ..... a lush greenery that makes it difficult to see the enemy. let's wait until next year.
    37. 0
      10 February 2023 13: 04
      There is a saying: "Everything new is well forgotten old." Back in the 18th century, Suvorov defeated the Polish military group, which was three times larger in number and equipment than the Russian military group in Poland. After that, Poland as a state ceased to exist. It was then that the hero of Poland, Kosciuszko, fled to America from Suvorov. Suvorov applied the tactics of mobile warfare. His motto to win: "The main thing is speed and onslaught", was of decisive importance. And during the Great Patriotic War, the Pole Rokossovsky, together with Zhukov, using tanks, defeated the Germans with the help of fast, powerful blows and for the third time in the history of Russia captured the capital of Germany, Berlin. Now the Russian school teaches history very badly. Young people do not know the greatest victories and events in the history of Russia. Let the "Military Review" tell more for the youth about the great events in the history of Russia. Repetition is the mother of learning. It's time for Russia to refresh its memory: the Poles, the Ukrainian fascists, the aggressors from the US and NATO, to repeat the lessons of history for them.
    38. 0
      11 February 2023 22: 04
      American analysts believe that Russian troops will not be able to launch a large-scale offensive as scheduled, because they do not have sufficient "combat power." It is stated that the Russian command is allegedly in a hurry, therefore, it will begin large-scale actions with insufficient forces, and this will lead to the failure of all plans. Thus, it is concluded that there will be no liberation of Donbass in the near future.

      Where does the data come from?
      Does the US know what plans our General Staff is developing?
      Do they know that our General Staff is in a hurry?

      If the United States really knows what is being planned in our General Staff, what areas are priority, what options for the development of hostilities are being discussed, then ... Is there a General Staff?

      Or is it just an informational blizzard. Why would we be horrified here, shouting about "everything is lost", spoiling our own country with our own emotions.
    39. 0
      13 February 2023 03: 23
      "Strategists"!!! - another crap from Fashington, such articles are designed for the layman of average idiocy, that is, for his own.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"