The representative of the Zaporizhia administration announced the expediency of moving the front 150 km

45
The representative of the Zaporizhia administration announced the expediency of moving the front 150 km

Continued bulk shipments of Western weapons Kyiv leads to the need to adjust the actions of the Russian Armed Forces, depending on the nature of the weapons and the timing of their delivery.

According to Volodymyr Rogov, a member of the main council of the Zaporizhia administration, due to the latest aid from the West in the form of long-range missiles, it is worth thinking about the need to move the front 150 kilometers away.



GLSDB bombs are capable of covering a distance of 150 kilometers. The risks are big and you need to act proactively

- said Rogov, transmit RIA News.

Rogov clarified that it is necessary, of course, to move the front in the direction of the enemy, but it is not entirely clear whether this is a feasible task for today. After all, if Russian troops can so easily move the front for tens of kilometers, the question arises why this has not yet happened.

GLSDB are small-sized precision-guided munitions, in fact, American-made wing bombs. Kyiv sought to receive this ammunition last year, but they were never delivered to it. Now there is a possibility of their deliveries to Ukraine.

A representative of the administration of the Zaporozhye region noted that many settlements in the rear of Russian troops, including the cities of Energodar, Melitopol, Berdyansk and even Luhansk, could be under attack by the enemy. Therefore, it is necessary not to wait until these bombs begin to arrive, but to “hard push back the line of contact” by 150 km, Rogov believes.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    February 8 2023
    If the front along the current line of contact is frozen until the next closest war with Ukraine and NATO, then the land corridor to Crimea will be a through-and-through death road - Kherson, Zaporozhye, Donetsk, Luhansk regions of the Russian Federation and Crimea will be constantly subjected to attacks by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as it was all the last 9 years in the Donbass, in this case there will be no peaceful life there - it will be possible to forget about any socio-economic development of these regions.

    Without the liberation of the ports of Kherson, Nikolaev and Odessa, it is absolutely impossible to ensure the security of Crimea - it will always be under attack if the Russian Federation does not fully control these ports.

    If the mother of Russian cities Kyiv and the hero city Odessa and all the primordially Russian lands between them as a result of the NWO remain abroad, outside the territory of the Russian Federation, then this will be the largest geopolitical catastrophe for Russia and a tragedy for many generations of the Russian people for centuries.

    Putin is obliged to clearly define the spatial, territorial limits of the NWO - the liberation from the Nazis of Ukraine to the western administrative borders of the Zhytomyr and Vinnitsa regions of the former Ukraine and further along the Dniester to its confluence with the Black Sea.

    Otherwise, a new war will be inevitable.
    1. -1
      February 8 2023
      If you leave Galicia to them, then the probability of new wars is 99%! NATO will prepare them for revenge and will consider that they have the right! So only complete surrender or accession!
      1. +3
        February 8 2023
        Quote: Argon
        So only complete surrender or accession!

        Argon (Hasan) shouted and ran waving the flag towards NWO. And what and how to control then? and to restore such a territory, where did the shishi come from, even if with the first two questions, will it be decided in an incomprehensible way? Slogans are cool of course, but what if you think about it?
        You need to bite as much as you can swallow, or even choke for a short time (especially "Western") ... the game should be worth the candle ..
        1. -3
          February 8 2023
          with this approach, it was not necessary to bite at all, to surrender Crimea and Donbass and continue to supply resources to the West in exchange for beads. well, continue to die out at a rate of 2 million in three years to the delight of the Central Asians and the Great Turan Erdogan ..

          if you think that you will take Slavyansk and agree, you are deeply mistaken. you have already shown your weakness, and the Ukrainians have shown that they are ready to fight to the last Ukrainian. they will be re-armed, trained, and they will eventually take whatever they want. for victory will be declared in Russia, fanfares will sound and champagne will flow like water, and gangrene will continue to corrode all sections of Russian society. and with the physical departure of Putin (and until that moment there is not much time left), this whole abscess will stir up and demolish Russia.

          therefore, it is necessary to decide here and now ... along the way announcing the 37th year in the government. and giving ukram time for a break is the way to the abyss. 8 years have clearly shown what naked propaganda alone can do ... now, in addition to propaganda, there will be NATO weapons and a desire to take revenge. especially since Russia, with its indistinct actions, showed that it can be beaten with virtually impunity
          1. +2
            February 8 2023
            According to Volodymyr Rogov, a member of the main council of the Zaporizhia administration, due to the latest aid from the West in the form of long-range missiles, it is worth thinking about the need to move the front 150 kilometers away.
            Rogov says everything is correct. Russia needs to act ahead of the curve.
            With the liberation of the DPR and LPR from the Nazi regime in Kyiv, the war between NATO and Russia in the theater of Ukraine will not end. This is not even a dream.

            Quote: Nikolay310
            therefore, it is necessary to decide here and now ... along the way announcing the 37th year in the government. and giving ukram time for a break is the way to the abyss.
            This is the most correct.
            Neither the "5th column" (among the population), nor the "6th column" (among officials) should exist in Russia!
            The Russophobe-Nazi Borrell, with his support by the West of all kinds of foreign agents of influence and enemies inside Russia, is under a tribunal and "on soap" as a war criminal as an "arsonist" of TMV!
          2. +2
            February 8 2023
            Quote: Nikolay310
            with this approach, there was absolutely NOTHING to bite, surrender Crimea and Donbass

            well .. You, like your colleague, need to (in a vacuum) .. if you understood my comment that way, I will focus on its important parts
            Quote: Level 2 Advisor
            What are you all going to do - screaming full affiliation? And what and how to control then? and to restore such a territory, where did the shishi come from, even if with the first two questions, will it be decided in an incomprehensible way?
            the best answer would be for me .. to answer these questions, and not get another bag of slogans with joyful and not very shouting
    2. +1
      February 8 2023
      And why are we giving away Khmelnitsky, our radar station is there, a good town, a good tavern, I was on a business trip.)
      1. -5
        February 8 2023
        And why are we giving Khmelnytsky
        Proskurov is ours!
    3. +7
      February 8 2023
      "Putin is obliged to clearly indicate"? Putin can designate anything, but what's the point? Putin indicated that Kherson and Zaporozhye are Russian cities. But judging by the results of the past year, this will never happen. Therefore, the idea of ​​a referendum, after which they surrendered Kherson, turned into an absurd farce. Success can be considered if it is possible to keep the existing areas, well, even half of Artemovsk into the bargain, but nothing more. Why am I so sure? Yes, because all over the world they are trumpeting the victory of Ukraine. On the part of our authorities, they are silent, only sarcastic antics, but silence is a sign of consent.
  2. +9
    February 8 2023
    It is advisable to move the front to the border with Poland.
    1. 0
      February 8 2023
      Why do we need a genetically Nazi Galicia? Let the Poles take it for themselves and re-educate.
      Yes, to the border with Poland - only this border should pass along the western administrative borders of the Zhytomyr and Vinnitsa regions of the former Ukraine.
      1. -1
        February 8 2023
        in this way you strengthen Poland, which is also extremely hostile to Russia. why strengthen the enemies, I don’t understand ... but the cunning plan that the zapukry will blow up Poland from the inside is just as ridiculous as "Europe will freeze in winter and crawl itself"
        1. +1
          February 8 2023
          in this way you strengthen Poland, which is also extremely hostile to Russia

          Poland is a NATO country, but NATO itself does not want to get involved in a direct conflict with Russia, because it will most likely lead to a big bad boom. And even more so because of Poland. And in the event of an attack, such a response could theoretically follow. Here, of course, there is a moment with the recognition by the entire "civilized world" of these territories for Russia, which most likely will not happen in recent history. But nevertheless, if the Russian Federation considers this to be its territory, then there is a chance of a bang, because. it fits into the doctrine
    2. +1
      February 8 2023
      I've been saying this for a long time.)
      It will be so soon.
  3. +3
    February 8 2023
    What forces does he propose to do this? request
    1. -1
      February 8 2023
      It is necessary to bring the SVO grouping to 2023 million people during 2, to increase at least 5 times the number of combat units of the main classes there (ships, aircraft, helicopters, tanks, armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, self-propelled guns, MLRS, OTRK and others).
      Open offensives in addition to Donbass in 5 more areas:
      1) from the south to Zaporozhye and Yekaterinoslav
      2) to the west from the Crimea through the Dnieper to Kherson, Nikolaev and Odessa
      3) in the north through Sumy and Chernihiv to Kyiv
      4) surrounding Kharkov to Cherkasy, Poltava
      5) from Belarus to Moldova in the direction of Mozyr - Korosten - Zhitomir - Berdichev - Vinnitsa - Mogilev-Podolsky.

      The Armed Forces of Ukraine will have an overstrain of forces - the defense will fall.
      1. +2
        February 8 2023
        Did I understand correctly that you are proposing, in addition to this, 5 mobilizations of a similar past and together three-shift work of military factories per day (3x8h = 24) to make 15x8 = 120?
        1. -1
          February 8 2023
          most importantly, who, with a mobilization of 1,5 people, will remain working in factories ... really, "effective managers" and other office plankton? well, yes, they will "stick" shells for you ... if you call this plankton to the front, then the front will crumble ...

          you need to proceed from the realities of today, and not remember the 41st year ... in the 41st year, Moscow was a city of workers, with a huge number of plants and factories. now there are people with "effective consumers" in this place
      2. +4
        February 8 2023
        Quote from DefenderofTruth
        It is necessary to bring the NWO grouping up to 2023 million people during 2


        And who will lead them? Where to get so many competent sergeants and officers?
        And where do you propose to place so many people so that there is no repetition of the Makeevskaya tragedy?
        And what about supplying such a horde as when all paths are under the control of NATO space satellites?

        Let's have your suggestions on each issue.
        1. +2
          February 8 2023
          to place is the simplest question (of the others) ... because the length of the front increases, and crowding does not increase. but who will command, what to shoot and what to dress up is a big question ... as well as the question of who will work in the rear ... the state has been raising "effective consumers" for 30 years ... in the 41st men who went to the front replaced by children and women ... now there are not so many children, and it is hardly possible to make an army of turners out of big-lipped silicone kept women ...

          Russia has fallen into a stalemate when it is necessary to occupy territories, but at the same time there is really no one to occupy it, either at the front or in the rear ...

          there is an option to try to recruit Ukrainians, but even here our state is at half past six ... neither the idea of ​​​​a common future, nor models of economic development ... the fish has rotted from the head and hence all the problems ... the economy has collapsed, the youth has been missed, the image of the future has not been created. .. some show-offs, but puffing out the cheeks ...
      3. +4
        February 8 2023
        Colleague, the feeling that you wrote the charters for the war commercials of the 18-19th century !!
        What are you going to arm 2 million with? Mosinki? Can you name the birth rate then and now? How are you going to compensate for the losses?
        What kind of nonsense about increasing the number of combat units of weapons by 5 times? Do you think that this is done not by decades of creating a scientific and industrial base, by imprisoning corrupt officials, but by signing one decree - to increase it 5 times by next Monday! Do you see everything? And how many, taking into account those who left and those being mobilized, are you ready to wrest from the economy?
        War is the quintessence of the economy!!! Without creating a basis, all your dreams will be an analogue of the result for Russia in the First World War and the Russian-Japanese War.
  4. -1
    February 8 2023
    I just spoke on the next branch about the need to move the front line from Kharkov to the west ... request now the official is talking about it already in Zaporozhye.
    The British are already promising to supply the Armed Forces of Ukraine with more long-range weapons ... I wonder what it will be and in what time frame. what
    1. +1
      February 8 2023

      I just spoke on the next branch about the need to move the front line from Kharkov to the west ..

      Don't talk, but put it into action. And kicking our fighters in the ass, sitting on the couch, you don’t need a big mind
      1. +1
        February 8 2023
        Quote: Sergey_tactics
        . And kicking our fighters in the ass, sitting on the couch, you don’t need a big mind

        You lie balabol ... I never said that.
        I see that you are a cheap provocateur.
        Attributing your fantasies to me.
      2. 0
        February 8 2023
        and you will give him patronage in the place of Gerasimov? or maybe Putin himself? ... operations are being developed not by an ordinary Vasya in a trench ...
    2. 0
      February 8 2023
      if you move the border by 150 km...remove Donetsk from shelling, then Kherson and Zaporozhye will be shelled...or can they be and they are not so sacred???

      there is no point in pushing out for the sake of pushing out...there is only sense in the defeat of Bandera Ukrainians...by the way, can you remind me when was the last time a massive missile strike was on targets inside Ukraine??? that's it ... December 31st and a weak launch in mid-January of 30 missiles ...
      1. -1
        February 8 2023
        Quote: Nikolay310
        do not remind me when was the last time a massive missile strike was on targets inside Ukraine??? that's it ... December 31st and a weak launch in mid-January of 30 missiles ...

        Were the Hoh-lys right about the lack of missiles?
  5. +1
    February 8 2023
    it is worth thinking about the need to move the front 150 kilometers away.
    But who can argue with that. Everything has its turn, so the time will come pushed back. That's just why pass the common truth as your tactical-strategic thinking. At the same time, further specifying that
    you need to move the front, of course, towards the enemy
    Well thanks, the direction was determined. Rogov is distinguished by his excessive love for the Internet, where he systematically screams that everything is lost, and then manipulates common truths in the same way.
  6. +10
    February 8 2023
    Maybe it’s enough to drag something like this to VO?
    What the hell??? Let's push back 150 km and what, these 150 km will not be our liberated territory, but some kind of gray zone that can be allowed to bomb, shell, etc. ???
    That is, our Donetsk cannot be shelled, and our Kharkov (I am sure that we will definitely liberate it), etc. will it already be possible to fire, since he gets into this "buffer" zone?
    Well, enough already to print absolutely harmful statements showing that for someone there is a more valuable territory of the country, more valuable people, but there are less. No, it's not. Every centimeter of the territory of our state, including the liberated areas, is full-fledged people, the lands of our country, and we are obliged to protect them exactly the same as the inhabitants of even Melitopol, even Kamchatka ...
  7. HAM
    +4
    February 8 2023
    Bekhan, you are constantly just reprinting articles from the Free Press website, please give at least some of your assessments, otherwise this is just plagiarism.
  8. +2
    February 8 2023
    In fact, it is correct not at 150, but at 1500 km.
    1. -1
      February 8 2023
      In fact, it is correct not at 150, but at 1500 km.

      and why do we need a front line in Slovakia or Hungary?
    2. -3
      February 8 2023
      In fact, it is correct not at 150, but at 1500 km.

      Academic example of populist cretinism
  9. 0
    February 8 2023
    Interestingly, our military also think in terms of some kind of lines and occupied settlements?
  10. +2
    February 8 2023
    Well, you can say whatever you want, but in real life the fronts are moving not from the Wishlist but from the moguls and, according to your own rules, at least snuggle up in a cozy chair.
  11. 0
    February 8 2023
    Why is this applicant not on the front line? Let him move the front, the flag in his hands. And where do these Rogovs come from...
  12. +2
    February 8 2023
    You can, of course, talk about 150, then 300 km, but in my opinion there is no need to stop in the conduct of the NWO to the outer borders of the ruin - Polish, Hungarian, Moldavian and Romanian.
    It’s calmer this way, and it won’t fly even a kilometer from there, otherwise, if even “6 acres” of uncleaned territory of dill remains, there will be no end to the war.
  13. +2
    February 8 2023
    Well, Newton's binomial suggested! It has long been necessary to push the front line deeper into the ruins. And much more than 150 km. Preferably to the Plskaya and Moldavian borders. But how to do it quickly?
  14. 0
    February 8 2023
    Why do all the callers to move to the Polish border prefer to sit here, and not stand in line at the military registration and enlistment office? request
  15. +1
    February 8 2023
    Then there will be missiles from the United States, with a range of 300 km, and again push the border? The issue needs to be resolved once.
  16. -1
    February 8 2023
    if they could move the front, they would do it
  17. 0
    February 8 2023
    Je ne connais rien à l'histoire de cette région et encore moins en "stratégie" .
    Mais en tant que néophyte je me dis qu'avoir une "barrière" d'eau entre soi et ses ennemis cela doit être plus pratique, donc la ligne du fleuve et de ses lacs semblerait "logique"...mais c'est loin des positions actuelles?


    I don't know anything about the history of this region and even more so about the "strategy".
    But as a neophyte, I tell myself that having a water "barrier" between myself and my enemies should be more convenient, so the line of the river and its lakes would seem "logical" ... but is it far from the current positions?
    1. -1
      February 8 2023
      Quote from Yanni Kounnar
      une "barrière" d'eau entre soi et ses ennemis cela doit être plus pratique, donc la ligne du fleuve et de ses lacs semblerait "logique".

      Oui, vous avez raison. Mais malheureusement, on ne peut pas (et on ne faut pas!) discuter de "praticité d'une barrière sur la ligne du fleuve", quand l'Ukraine a la possibilité de bombarder le territoires russes jusqu'a la Crimée (et la Crimea aussi) de cette distance.
  18. -1
    February 8 2023
    it is worth thinking about the need to move the front 150 kilometers away.
    If it were possible to do this, then not only could many settlements be protected, but they would also slightly reduce the line of contact
  19. 0
    February 8 2023
    Yes, this is not just expediency .. it's just a screaming necessity!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"