The source called the reason for the high efficiency of the use of missiles to destroy the Ukrainian radar

Russian aviation during a special military operation to destroy Ukrainian radar stations, an aircraft missile showed the highest efficiency. This was told by a source in the Russian defense industry.

High efficiency has been achieved thanks to the new universal head. According to the source, the missile developed by the Tactical Missiles Corporation was equipped with a universal seeker, which allowed it to hit all types of targets, including radar stations. The previous version of the missile had three different guidance heads for use on different targets. At the same time, he did not name the ammunition used by the Russian troops.

The newest air-to-radar missile was equipped with the latest universal warhead capable of operating on all types of targets

- leads TASS source words

In October last year, the high efficiency of missiles for destroying radars, reaching 98%, was already reported. It was about the new high-speed Kh-31PD air-to-radar missile manufactured by the Tactical Missiles Corporation. It is precisely this that is used by Russian Su-35S and Su-30SM fighters to destroy stations, air defense systems, etc. in the SVO zone.

The Kh-31PD anti-radar high-speed missile is a modification of the Kh-31P missile. The main changes - the flight range has been increased to 250 kilometers, three selective heads have been replaced with one broadband one, which jams the entire range of applied and predicted frequencies of a potential enemy's air defense systems. The mass of the warhead has been increased to 110 kg.

As noted, in the course of the SVO, the entire line of means of aviation destruction developed by the KTRV, including promising ones, was tested.

Comments

[Machito]

98% hit targets. An amazing result. Bravo.

[Argon]

Still would have invented something against MANPADS. The most annoying thing is probably to get a stinger in the barrel. Nasty little thing.
I wonder if there is such a tactic when they fly at a distance of 10-15 km one after another ?! It would be possible to detect the launch of MANPADS and report it to the person in front and at the same time attack the launch site. And so several planes in a chain. In Israel, it was like that, but they worked at the airfields ..

[Machito]

Quote: Argon

Still would have invented something against MANPADS. The most annoying thing is probably to get a stinger in the barrel. Nasty little thing.
I wonder if there is such a tactic when they fly at a distance of 10-15 km one after another ?! It would be possible to detect the launch of MANPADS and report it to the person in front and at the same time attack the launch site. And so several planes in a chain. In Israel, it was like that, but they worked at the airfields ..

We need hundreds, thousands of UAVs that will control the airspace for tens of kilometers along the front and in the depth of defense, then any movement on the ground will be visible from above, and there will be immediate target designation in real time.

[Argon]

An interesting approach))) but will there be a mess in this case? It is not clear where, who???

[Egeny]

The satellite constellation needs to be increased. That's all.
UAV only on LBS.

[Sergey Dvornikov]

And how many operators will be needed for these hundreds of thousands?

[Grigory_78]

If there are tens and hundreds of thousands of drones, their control will have to be automated. Yes, tens of thousands of service personnel will be needed, but these are thousands of foot soldiers saved.

[Rzzz]

And for each of your soldiers a beacon so that they don’t click it in real time?

[begemot20091]

what nonsense. a satellite with good optics - and it's enough to see everything. even a cockroach on the butt of an elephant in a zoo.

[bk316]

a satellite with good optics - and it is enough to see everything.

Well, let's omit the moment that no one has yet managed to get a 24x7 picture in real time.
But do you at least understand that a satellite is a sensor, an eye in a simple way, and someone who understands that this is an enemy soldier with MANPADS, that is, a brain, is needed for him.

[novel66]

And there will be two or three launchers, and minus two aircraft

[Argon]

A chain of several aircraft! Modulate the place of the starter in your head. What will be dangerous at the time of launch? Personally, I would think a hundred times before launch if there is a threat of detection by the next plane! And if you wait for the last one, then you will have to miss a few and it is not known which is the last one. Yes, and a warning system for flying overflow will not be superfluous. Especially if this system is automatic. Throwing traps when attacking at the right time from a signal is not a bad idea like

[poquello]

Quote: Argon

Still would have invented something against MANPADS. The most annoying thing is probably to get a stinger in the barrel.

here every month some stingerist comes out, smoke Vitebsk

[topol717]

High efficiency, very high, but aircraft fly at extremely low altitudes.
You are either a cross or cowards.

[Silver99]

Any military conflict is a test and improvement of weapons, the SVO also showed gaps in the Russian army, in addition to the production of drones, an analogue of the "Himers" is needed, low ammunition consumption with high accuracy, six rounds of ammunition arrive with a spread of 10 cm, and uses universal charges, our gunsmiths underestimated , we urgently need to fix it and make it better and more powerful.

[sir.jonn]

Quote from Silver99

urgently need to be corrected and made better and more powerful.

A lot of things need to be corrected. UAVs on TV were invented more and better than anyone else, and as a result, Iranian crafts go to the army. It’s generally embarrassing to talk about the equipment of the soldiers, the “Warrior” was promoted so much, and as a result, the mobilized people bought all the clothes in hunting stores. Such incidents must not only be corrected, certain individuals must be held responsible for them.

[Sergey Dvornikov]

We from Orenburg sent warm socks, portable stoves, burners for heating food, firewood and two UAZs to dill - this is

[Georgy Sviridov_2]

In fact, such complexes have been developed for a long time. Tornado-r was adopted a long time ago, tornado-s did not have time to start the operation. And the work has been going on for a long time. On the other hand, the Iskander performs the tasks of the Himers ... There are fewer missiles, but they are more difficult to shoot down and the warhead itself is much more powerful. That is, the question here is not so much in the means of destruction, but in intelligence and the chain of command, because even if the target is detected, this information must reach the command, so that it considers this target a priority and gives the command to defeat it. Tornado complexes will shorten the chain somewhat, as they will be part of motorized rifle / tank brigades and divisions directly.

[Normann]

spread 10 cm

why not ten millimeters)

[bk316]

already analogue of "Hymers",

About 10 cm, you are lying, and you are lying mindlessly.
Claimed QUO 3 m.
10 cm is not only impossible to support with any technologies, but it is absolutely meaningless.

And an analogue of Hymars, moreover, its superior Tornado -s. You don't have to invent.

Yes, in fact, the same thing with UAVs - you have to do it.

[Cananecat]

In the course of the SVO, the entire line of means of aviation destruction developed by the KTRV, including promising ones, was tested.

It is interesting that the enemy tested the promising one. This kind of information can be released to the masses.

[DenD]

98% of the destruction of the Russian-Soviet radars or including NATO countries? It is important. The range of 250 km is certainly impressive.

[AAC]

In the summary, many NATO radars slipped. Most likely with the same weapon, the principles of operation are the same.

[Carat]

Quote from dend

98% of the destruction of the Russian-Soviet radars or including NATO countries?

My answer is obvious

three selective heads were replaced by one broadband head, which jams the entire range of applied and predicted frequencies of operation of potential enemy air defense systems.

[poquello]

Quote from dend

98% of the destruction of the Russian-Soviet radars or including NATO countries? It is important. The range of 250 km is certainly impressive.

you look at the number of destroyed American radars, questions will disappear

[stels_07]

I can’t reason with Shota, if there is such a miracle rocket, then why does aviation fly so low?

[Egoza]

Quote: stels_07

I can’t reason with Shota, if there is such a miracle rocket, then why does aviation fly so low?

So Schaub fly over the huts. Russians do not fight civilians. There is a chance to get out alive.

[alexmach]

Because there is a rocket, and by the way, it is massive, you can see it on all shots of Su-shek flights, but with its actual use, as reported, there are big problems.

[bk316]

and with its actual application, as reported, big problems.

There is only one problem - it is aimed at a WORKING radar.

[Normann]

In order to destroy the relay, you need to know where this radar is located, and if it is turned on only after the command, that's the answer to your question.

[Rzzz]

And there are also cheats.
Go and pick out a real station among two dozen beacons hung on birch trees.
The enemy is also not stupid ****, do not underestimate. He is better prepared and better equipped.

[solar]

The aircraft missile used by Russian aviation during a special military operation to destroy Ukrainian radar stations has shown the highest efficiency.

To be honest, the "highest efficiency" against the radar does not agree well with the fact that after a year of hostilities, the Ukrainian air defense continues to actively exist and actually prevent the admission of aviation beyond the front line.
I would like to hear an explanation for this from a "source in the Russian defense industry."

[Ka-52]

I would like to hear an explanation for this from a "source in the Russian defense industry."

this does not require a "source in the defense industry". It is enough to think for yourself or turn to history. As an example: with all their global air superiority, the Americans failed to completely suppress the air defense of Yugoslavia. They simply switched to a hidden mode of operation, from an ambush, by nomadic installations. Guidance radars turn on only for a short time, making it difficult to fix them, followed by a change in position (as American harms can continue to point to the place of the last fixation of the radar operation). Therefore, it is practically impossible to completely destroy the enemy's air defense, especially in relation to Ukraine. Where NATO AWACS monitor our aircraft, surveillance radars themselves can hide on the territory of neighboring countries, etc.

[solar]

the Americans failed to completely suppress the air defense of Yugoslavia.

They did it with sufficient efficiency for their purposes. The Americans flew almost freely over Yugoslavia. Tens of thousands of sorties, tens of thousands of tons of various types of ammunition used in two and a half months.

[Andy_nsk]

Where NATO AWACS monitor our aircraft,

Maybe it's enough to switch arrows to AWACS. Target detection range with EPR 1 sq.m. 400 km, and 600 km - for large "strategists" (who do not fly over the outskirts). Now look at the globe.

[bk316]

Now look at the globe.

You look at the globe - everything behind the Dnieper is covered.
The entire south of 404 is covered. Melitopol, Kherson, Nikolaev, Zaporozhye, Dnepropetrovsk are all under the supervision of Avaks

[bairat]

I will assume, from the couch, of course, that in some cases their mock-ups are taken for the destroyed radar stations, with some kind of primitive radio wave emitters. Well, I would have done that in the place of the enemy.

[Oleg Ogorod]

Well, probably the Ukrainian radars are of the wrong caliber. Or missiles feel sorry for their defeat.
After all, if a rocket flies 250 km, then almost the entire eastern, southern and central part of Ukraine could be deradarized. Not flying over the front line.
But by the way, this is SVO.

[poquello]

Quote: Oleg Ogorod

Well, probably the Ukrainian radars are of the wrong caliber. Or missiles feel sorry for their defeat.
After all, if a rocket flies 250 km, then almost the entire eastern, southern and central part of Ukraine could be deradarized. Not flying over the front line.
But by the way, this is SVO.

and how do you deradar it off? when it will be possible to destroy bourgeois AWACS and other radars in the adjacent territory - it will be easier

[telobezumnoe]

and what prevents her from launching some kind of layout in front of her to provoke the work of air defense and identify radars and launch points

[bk316]

To be honest, the "highest efficiency" against the radar does not agree well with the fact that after a year of hostilities, the Ukrainian air defense continues to actively exist and actually prevent the admission of aviation beyond the front line.

It doesn’t agree in your head, maybe because it’s not in the topic, maybe because there are problems with the thinker. On this topic, everyone has unsubscribed 100 times already.

[alexey_444]

Any complaints about the buttons? no, in this vein, the article, the effectiveness of missiles is, and the planes behind the front line fly for some kilometers, we can’t fly to the bridges, they’ll knock down how much cheap cast iron, but we can’t use it. After such articles, there are talks about agreements, like yes, we are left alone, but they don’t give. Fly bomber should be read how things really are with these missiles.

[guerilla707]

And what prevents bombing, for example, from the MiG-31 ?, in addition to missiles, it is also capable of working with bombs
"Air-to-surface fire is possible [37] Laser-guided bombs weighing 500 kg, Kh-31P anti-radar / anti-ship missiles (up to 160 km) and Kh-58. The maximum combat load mass is 9 tons."
For air defense, it is inaccessible, as an example, the story of the Chinese ball, until it dropped 20 km, the Americans smoked bamboo

[wladimirjankov]

interfere with the S-300 and beeches of the Nazis still not destroyed by our valiant army. They will get any of our aircraft, including MiG-31.

[guerilla707]

The s-300 affected area is from 250m to 27 km, in fact the ceiling of the s-300 is 25km, and only the latest modifications have a ceiling of 27km, the ceiling of the mig-31 is 30km

[Sergey Ivanov_25]

Do not confuse the ceiling static and dynamic! At 30 km, he can only "jump", having accelerated well

[guerilla707]

https://topwar.ru/210260-na-smotri-vverh-bolshoe-amerikanskoe-unizhenie-iz-kitaja.html#comment-id-13309168
Read this article, even the United States over its territory cannot at these heights, and there’s nothing to say about APU

[guerilla707]

The beech is even smaller, do not confuse the affected area and the maximum height ceiling, the beech of the Ukronazis is actually 18 km in height

[kill the fascist]

Well, if this is actually the case, and not another PR campaign. We have already heard enthusiastic reports of domestic bureaucrats at all sorts of air shows that they caught up with everyone in the production of UAVs, and we are ironing banderlogs with shahid mopeds. Only the personal responsibility of officials and managers for spending budget money can increase the efficiency of the system.

[Nikolaevich I]

Lord! Yes, what is it!? For the umpteenth time, a message about the X-31 is being "submitted" to VO as "the latest news"! By the way, I really like the PRR X-59UShKE (TP)! "In some ways" it is better, in my opinion, PRR X-31 ...! But, it seems, now she is assigned the role of "Cinderella"!

[Jafar]

By the way, I really like the PRR X-59UShKE (TP)

Probably still X-58

[B-15]

98% of hitting targets is achievable only by solving the problem of maintaining the target's location in guidance after it has removed the high one.
I think that increasing the warhead to 110kg also solves this problem.
In a word - GOOD FELLOWS KTRV!!!

[Hey]

In my opinion, we also need a rocket with the same functionality, but a little easier and can be closer (and therefore cheaper) to destroy counter-battery stations, electronic warfare in the frontline zone.

[alexmach]

In my opinion, we also need a rocket with the same functionality, but a little easier and can be closer (and therefore cheaper)

They say there is still some Tehran-1

[savage3000]

Yes? Maybe Rugeran? Mugeran? Waggeran?)))

[bk316]

to destroy counter-battery stations,

They can be covered with art.

[oldmetal]

"which jams the entire range of applied and predicted operating frequencies of a potential enemy's air defense systems"

Silences the electronic warfare. And the PRR reveals and destroys.

[Vasily Lugovskoy]

And why don’t we then fly tens of kilometers beyond the line of contact and smash with cast iron at a height inaccessible to MANPADS - bridges and railways and roads, enemy columns

[Jafar]

three selective heads were replaced by one broadband, which suppresses the entire range of applied and predicted frequencies 

There's nothing nobody suppresses These are receiving antennas.

[wladimirjankov]

which jams the entire range of applied and predicted operating frequencies of a potential enemy's air defense systems.

The X-31PD anti-radar missile is still not an electronic warfare tool. Its purpose is not to "jam" frequencies, but to fix them and fly to their source.

[the Urals]

Warhead 110 kg? So this rocket can even be planted in a bunker or in a boat

[savage3000]

So this is PKR. Just in the modification against the radar.

[Glagol1]

The air defense of the 404th was not suppressed. Nowhere. So you can sing songs about 31 products, but we still cannot fly there. Because they'll kill you. In the best case, with the cabriolet nurses over the areas. Well, there's nothing you can do. Thanks to our military intelligence officers for making such a mistake in assessing the air defense potential of the Ukroreich.

[savage3000]

one broadband, which jams the entire range of applied and predicted frequencies of air defense systems
___________

Shaw? What is the x-31 jamming there? What is the article all about?

[certero]

Don't praise yourself...
If we evaluate the situation by such an advertising OR post, before Ukraine was defeated a long time ago, and Ukrainian air defense is absent as a class.
Now let's get serious. To evaluate the effectiveness of a missile, you need to have confirmation of hitting the target. And with this we have such problems that even on the transmission or in the near rear of the enemy there is often no evidence, what can we say about the radar.

[Vashek]

It is immediately obvious that the author is a specialist - the PRR does not detect, but "jams" the radio emission. Well, understand what you write!

[Krilion]

Quote: Bearded

Quote: Argon

Still would have invented something against MANPADS. The most annoying thing is probably to get a stinger in the barrel. Nasty little thing.
I wonder if there is such a tactic when they fly at a distance of 10-15 km one after another ?! It would be possible to detect the launch of MANPADS and report it to the person in front and at the same time attack the launch site. And so several planes in a chain. In Israel, it was like that, but they worked at the airfields ..

We need hundreds, thousands of UAVs that will control the airspace for tens of kilometers along the front and in the depth of defense, then any movement on the ground will be visible from above, and there will be immediate target designation in real time.

I believe that target designation is no longer required ... reconnaissance UAVs will most likely be strike drones at the same time ... I saw it - destroyed it .. although I’m not a military genius, and even during the Chechen wars I realized that it was urgently necessary to develop the direction of attack drones, looking like our special forces painfully ran through the mountains in search of shaitans .. it is obvious that it is much easier to launch an attack drone with a thermal imager, which, without risk to personnel, is able to solve a similar task .. it is a pity that our mossy generals from the General Staff were so impoverished in mind that they could not realize and to understand this simple thing .. if it weren’t for these idiots, the SVO would have gone according to a completely different scenario and probably would have ended a long time ago ... for those huge funds that were spent on the development of the Armata ceremonial tank, which we obviously will never see in combat, it was possible to develop from scratch and create entire air armies of universal drones that destroy all life ... it's a shame, but even the generals of Iran smarter than our "brilliant" commanders ..

[acetophenone]

Is the author's last name too well known for him to name it?

[Alex242]

Quote: Sergey Dvornikov

And how many operators will be needed for these hundreds of thousands?

a little, in automatic mode..

[Alex242]

Quote from Savage3000

one broadband, which jams the entire range of applied and predicted frequencies of air defense systems
___________

Shaw? What is the x-31 jamming there? What is the article all about?

a bit of ignorance....