Military Review

Reported missile strikes on military and industrial facilities in Kharkiv

27
Reported missile strikes on military and industrial facilities in Kharkiv

At night, explosions thundered at military facilities and industrial facilities in Kharkov. It is reported that a series of strikes was carried out in several "waves". According to the latest data, first an attempt was made to strike at the Belgorod region from the territory of the Kharkov region. The Russian air defense system intercepted ammunition fired from the Ukrainian side. This was followed by a backlash.


In total, in Kharkov there were up to seven explosions at various sites.

The Kyiv protege in Kharkov, Igor Terekhov, announced that fires broke out at the objects hit by blows. At the same time, he does not say which specific objects caught fire after the explosions on their territory.

Terekhov:

This is an industrial facility in the Kiev region.

The so-called governor of the Kharkiv region, Oleg Sinegubov, announced explosions in the central part of Kharkov as well. According to him, Russian troops used S-300 missiles to strike.



Sinegubov:

In total, there were from 6 to 10 such missiles.

According to some reports, the defeat was inflicted on an enterprise that was repairing military equipment. Objects where Ukrainian servicemen were located were also hit.
27 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. 8 February 2023 07: 01
    +3
    A missile strike is an answer with a series of retaliatory missile strikes ... what... the confrontation takes such a turn ... a purely local shootout.
    This can go on indefinitely...the logical solution to this problem is to move the front line further west.
    1. Sergei_tactics
      Sergei_tactics 8 February 2023 07: 08
      0
      ... the logical solution to this problem is to move the front line further west.

      What a deep strategic thought, Mr. "obvious" laughing we urgently need to include it in the textbooks for the academies of the Armed Forces lol
      So I understand this is your "ideas and knowledge" that you wrote about in another thread?
      1. Lech from Android.
        Lech from Android. 8 February 2023 07: 14
        +1
        Where is your deep solution?
        Where are your thoughts, ideas?
        One void.
        smile
        If you decide to make fun of me, then it’s useless ... I don’t give a damn about your trolling. hi
        Behind him, apart from the desire to humiliate a person, there is nothing ... ah ah ah you are not a good person. request
        1. Sergei_tactics
          Sergei_tactics 8 February 2023 07: 26
          -1
          Don't worry. Now you will be rewarded with likes for such enlightened strategic thinking)) because no one has thought of this before you laughing
          1. Lech from Android.
            Lech from Android. 8 February 2023 07: 31
            +1
            Quote: Sergey_tactics
            Don't worry. Now you will be rewarded with likes for such enlightened strategic thinking)) because no one has thought of this before you laughing

            Why should I worry about your stupid comments ... you don’t say anything smart ... and insulting people is not an indicator of your outstanding mind. hi smile
            1. Lech from Android.
              Lech from Android. 8 February 2023 07: 42
              0
              Well, the cons have gone ... but I was hoping that you would tell me how to solve the problem of shelling in the Belgorod region ... it’s not fate to see. request
    2. The black
      The black 8 February 2023 07: 15
      +1
      I’ll add to what has been written that yesterday some Latvian Nazi unsuccessfully smoked at a factory where drones are produced. The plant was built by the Americans on the territory of Latvia
    3. Epaulettes
      Epaulettes 8 February 2023 07: 22
      0
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      the logical solution to this problem is to move the front line further west.


      Logical, but in practice how to implement?
      1. Lech from Android.
        Lech from Android. 8 February 2023 07: 38
        +1
        Quote: Shoulder straps
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        the logical solution to this problem is to move the front line further west.


        Logical, but in practice how to implement?

        But in practice, the decisions of the Soviet command in this area in 1943 come to mind ... taking into account, of course, modern realities.
        1. Shark Lover
          Shark Lover 8 February 2023 07: 55
          +1
          Look at our losses for the liberation of Ukraine (that, our Ukraine). 2 people. Accordingly, which Army liberated in terms of numbers and what a limited contingent is now there.
          1. Lech from Android.
            Lech from Android. 8 February 2023 08: 02
            0
            With the saturation of the advanced units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with armored units, losses will inevitably increase ... this is a war ... they cannot be avoided .. we are still saved by the advantage in aviation and artillery.
            You can't get away with small losses now.
            1. Eug
              Eug 8 February 2023 08: 16
              +1
              No matter how cynical it looks, but it is necessary to calculate the options - long-term combat operations with relatively small daily losses or escalation of the database (if, of course, there is a possibility) with a reduction in terms and a serious increase in daily losses. The problem is that no one can give an exact answer, and taking into account external factors such as the "grain deal" and other "business projects", the task is incredibly complicated. I hope the best option is chosen, but losses - alas - still cannot be avoided ...
            2. crownn90
              crownn90 8 February 2023 09: 50
              0
              Well, how would it be in our power to prevent this saturation. It was correctly said that it was enough to sink the transport from Bradley. Another thing is that this is a direct clash with our direct enemy - the United States. In the same way, a lot was said about the specific place through which supplies from Poland go to Ukraine. It is also not very clear whether there is no political will for such a strike, or whether this is actually not the only way of supply. In short, more questions than answers
          2. Victor jnnjdfy
            Victor jnnjdfy 10 February 2023 22: 05
            0
            Far East. Two years on the river
    4. Sandor Clegane
      Sandor Clegane 8 February 2023 07: 30
      +1
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      the logical solution to this problem is to move the front line further west.

      no, the new line will have constant shelling ....
  2. dmi.pris1
    dmi.pris1 8 February 2023 07: 06
    +6
    It is necessary to strike in advance. A retaliatory strike, well, in this case it looks like some kind of revenge. And there should be destruction, strike warning
  3. DenD
    DenD 8 February 2023 07: 07
    +3
    More missiles, good and powerful. For there is no need to anger the Russian bear. Look, you decided to attack Belgorod.
  4. fiv
    fiv 8 February 2023 07: 08
    +2
    Yes, exactly S-300. And they added from the Tsar Cannon. What else can he say? Grunting is supposed to be due to the position.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 8 February 2023 07: 15
    -1
    According to him, Russian troops used S-300 missiles to strike.
    Why are they so obsessed with the S-300, or do they simply want to emphasize that the "Caliber" has run out? So don't wait. The strikes continue and it is desirable that they be more sensitive to the Ukrainian infrastructure and military installations.
    1. forty-eighth
      forty-eighth 8 February 2023 07: 19
      +4
      No, it’s just that when their air defense is once again redirected to a residential building or a Polish tractor, it’s very convenient to squeal that it’s the cursed Muscovites that converted the S-300 into a ground-to-ground complex
      1. Sailor
        Sailor 8 February 2023 07: 28
        +1
        And this is also, but in fact we really use the S-300 against ground targets too. Thanks Almaz-Antey, and provided the opportunity and quantity.
        1. topol717
          topol717 8 February 2023 12: 17
          0
          Quote: Sailor
          Thanks Almaz-Antey, and provided the opportunity and quantity.

          If this is so, and I hope so, then with what air defense do they want to shoot down a missile flying at a speed of 1200 m / s?
  6. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. 8 February 2023 07: 22
    0
    Quote: Black
    a Latvian Nazi had an unfortunate smoke at a factory where drones are produced.

    I did not know that drones can explode from smoke breaks. smile
  7. Revolver
    Revolver 8 February 2023 07: 30
    +1
    According to him, Russian troops used S-300 missiles to strike.
    Most likely, the crooked anti-aircraft gunners again sneered from the S-300 into a four-thread like "calibers" or, in general, shahid mopeds. And what was shot down, then shot down. Like they shot down a tractor with a trailer in Poland.
  8. Prjanik
    Prjanik 8 February 2023 07: 31
    +2
    They slammed the workshop that assembled drones at the Kharkov Aviation Plant. In Latvia, the production building of the plant, which makes drones for ukrov, caught fire. The urks themselves decided that they had nothing to lose and were throwing chemistry off the copters with might and main
  9. Aviator_
    Aviator_ 8 February 2023 08: 21
    0
    The so-called governor of the Kharkiv region, Oleg Sinegubov, announced explosions in the central part of Kharkov as well. According to him, Russian troops used S-300 missiles to strike.
    Now they will always say so. It is necessary to somehow explain the hand-back of your air defense.
    1. topol717
      topol717 8 February 2023 12: 22
      0
      Quote: Aviator_
      Now they will always say so. It is necessary to somehow explain the hand-back of your air defense.
      against these missiles, any air defense will be rudimentary. there are speeds of 5-6 max.