Head of EU diplomacy Borrell: Europe will do everything possible to win Ukraine in the conflict with Russia

The war in Ukraine is entering a new phase, Russia is preparing for a large-scale offensive, the task of Europe is to make sure that the Ukrainian army wins this conflict. This statement was made by the head of European diplomacy, Josep Borrell, in a publication for the Spanish press.

The European political functionary called on European countries to urgently increase military assistance to Ukraine, in particular, to quickly transfer heavy armored vehicles to Kyiv, including Tanks, thereby preparing the Armed Forces of Ukraine for the confrontation with the Russian army. According to Borrell, the European Union must not allow Moscow to win, it will not only be a defeat for Ukraine, but also for Western democracy.

Speaking against Russia, the official lumped together the "imperial ambitions" of Vladimir Putin, the alleged threat of using nuclear weapons. weapons on the "countries of democracy", the failure of the offensive strategy of the Russian army and the successes of the Ukrainian one, the destruction of the civilian infrastructure of Ukraine, Russian gas and oil, in general, everything that I heard out of the corner of my ear. But not forgetting to remind you that Kyiv will not be able to cope without Western weapons.

I have long argued that we should provide Ukraine with the means to expel Russia. Ukrainian forces need tanks to break the current stalemate in trench warfare and restore the momentum they had last fall when they recaptured Kharkiv and Kherson

- he said, adding that Europe is more than ever "determined" to put an end to this conflict with the victory of Ukraine.

Judging by Borrell’s statement, the EU is not considering the option of a peaceful end to the war, having finally taken the side of the neo-Nazi Zelensky regime and dreaming of “great victories” for Ukrainian tanks with white crosses on their armor. But there is another option, more realistic, where Russia wins.

Comments

[Mavrikiy]

Head of EU diplomacy Borrell: Europe will do everything possible to win Ukraine in the conflict with Russia

Question: what can Europe do?

[Silver99]

They are simply obsessed with the war with Russia, they surprisingly abandoned all their European affairs, the NATO country lies in ruins after the earthquake, brothers in arms are in no hurry to help it, again Russia, a generous soul, fit in to help, and they will come up with sanctions for us, here and Aeroflot has already been banned from flying to Turkey.

[Mikhail Tynda]

When did they manage to ban Aeroflot from flying to Turkey?

[topol717]

Quote: Mavrikiy

Question: what can Europe do?

They wrote to you that Europe will do everything possible. after the tanks, he will put planes and his troops, and then launch a nuclear strike.

[Myths]

Europe is primarily afraid that Russia will demolish it with nuclear weapons. After such Europe will no longer be like a ball. They are ready to put everything that is possible even to fill up with weapons. They don’t need tanks and artillery to capture territories; they understand the futility of this.

[blackGRAIL]

Before inflicting a nuclear strike on Russia, there should be a check of its (un)readiness to use it. The most logical thing is NATO's invasion of Belarus. Belarus is an ideal litmus test to test Russia's readiness to use nuclear weapons. Western countries that possess nuclear weapons are completely protected from the use of Russian nuclear weapons in such a conflict, Russia can strike only at Poland. In the NATO conventional war against Belarus + Russia, Belarus will lose. And Russia's unwillingness to use nuclear weapons raises the question of its readiness to use it at all. That's when the answer will be clear whether you can start a direct confrontation or not.

[Johnson Smithson]

Western countries possessing nuclear weapons are completely protected from the use of Russian nuclear weapons in such a conflict

in the EU, only France has it, there are still American bombs in storage, but if the United States allows them to be used, then there will be a blow to the United States, but do they need it?

[blackGRAIL]

Europe can do much more. If it is a question of the survival of Western democracies (or Pax America in other words), then they can transfer almost everything they have.

[Reklastik]

Without any "ifs" - this is not a matter of their survival, and they perfectly understand and know this. It is a matter of taking their rightful place in the modern world. No one is stopping them from living except themselves. Yes, Europe will no longer be able to live as before. But this is her ideological choice.

[DIM (a)]

The crown of the career of an ardent fascist in the field of diplomatic work!

[Azim77]

Green anarchists came to power, who are generally incompetent in public administration and diplomacy. They are in their maniacal idea to stop "global warming", the destruction of ozone, etc., relying on erroneous or false data, they are ready to destroy more than half of humanity. Through any means and means. Coronovirus, LGBT, drugs, pharmaceuticals, wars, HIV, hunger, etc. It is difficult to negotiate and get along with them, they are embittered like suicide bombers and ready for anything.
This is even worse than Nazism, because they want to destroy you not because of another race, but in general because you exist on earth.
Perhaps I am condensing, I am mistaken, but looking at such characters as Borrell, another does not come to mind.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Azim77

This is even worse than Nazism, because they want to destroy you not because of another race, but in general because you exist on earth.

The Nazism of Hitler's Germany, this was only the first phase, modern neo-Nazism, this is the second phase, much more cruel than the first. The first phase led to the disappearance of European states. Europe will not survive the second phase.

[I dare to_notice_]

That is why the whole of Europe will again rake for everything, and not just some Josep.

[blackGRAIL]

Be realistic, we can't do anything to Europe (except what it does to itself). Even assuming that Russia fully mobilizes and launches an offensive against Poland, NATO will simply deliver a nuclear strike against Poland (our grouping). This will all end.

[Shket53]

And why should we (Russia) attack Pshekia, and not easier to strike with a vigorous loaf on it .... and in your terminology, this will all end

[Sergey985]

Excuse me, may I ask a question? What kind of NATO can launch a nuclear strike? NATO does not have nuclear weapons. The USA, France and Great Britain have it (on a p / l, under the control of the USA). So only the United States can use nuclear weapons (which is impossible, the answer will fly instantly, yes France (it’s the same as undermining it on its territory, the effect is the same).

[I dare to_notice_]

Well, in the 45th they could? ..
And in the 12th too...
Russians are capable of miracles.
Once every hundred years. )

[Wedmak]

Some Josep will dump in the USA as soon as the smell of burnt (not even fried yet!) reaches his nose. Or maybe even earlier - as soon as he was told about it.

[Kaufman]

Throw cons. However, both Rutskoi and Strelkov correctly say that the Russian army is now unable to conduct strategic operations. The roar about our large-scale offensive is so - to scare the public in the USA and the EU so that they give more weapons and money

[evgen1221]

Sir or pan xs who you are or what. In the absence of Ukrainians on the defensive, a strategic offensive will happen by itself. And what, Poland will rush to the attack for the Ukrainians to die? And this means that the whole EU and England will burn down in an hour of Poland's offensive. Compare the sizes of Poland and the Russian Federation on the map.

[Kaufman]

For a year now I have been hearing and reading that there are practically no Ukrainians left in the defense. This is where it all comes crashing down. However, if we compare the situation in March and now, it turns out that something is wrong, that they retreated!!! And surrendered several cities.
And as for the possibilities of a strategic offensive, the feeling that he will soon demonstrate everything ((((, he will assemble a striking fist from leopards, Bradley and other zoos, soften the defense with attacks on warehouses behind the BS line and there will be a powerful regrouping like in the fall

[blackGRAIL]

Not a single nuclear power is guaranteed to suffer - due to a war on the territory of a third country, no one will be the first to launch a nuclear strike on the mother territory of a nuclear power. This is suicide. While the missiles are still in the air, a return launch will follow. Let's launch one rocket at London - we get 1 rocket at Moscow. Let's start according to the conditional Glasgow, we will get the conditional Yekaterinburg. By the way, England has already answered Medvedev - it takes a maximum of 20 minutes to make a decision on the return launch of Triden ICBMs. So other nuclear weapons are not afraid of our nuclear weapons at all. But Poland, yes, it can fly.

[Shket53]

Then why step on Pshekia, let it burn either from the Yankees or from us, I somehow don’t care about this Pshekia

[antiquity]

You say that as if there is no Russian missile defense system as a class, and the adversary has everything at the highest level.
I could be wrong, but they cannot catch hypersound. So far they can't.
And a blow to London is generally the solution to all issues and for a long time.
Britain is not sorry. At all. If I had the opportunity to erase the "rotten island" from the face of the Earth, I would not hesitate for a second.
The infection will remain on the island. Demonstrative spanking is a lesson to the rest.
Centuries-old colonizers, terrorists-destroyed.
Eh .. dreams.

[Sergey985]

Why shoot at London or Glasgow ?! Submarine-based ICBMs (the UK has no other nuclear weapons) only conditionally belong to the British. No launch is possible without US permission. There is a US representative on the ship, who will not confirm the launch code without a command from his leadership. I can also boldly declare that if a stone is thrown at my house from Mars, I will immediately launch an answer from a slingshot (I declare officially to the entire planet). This is from the same series as the British say.

[topol717]

Quote: kaufman

Throw cons. However, both Rutskoi and Strelkov correctly say that the Russian army is now unable to conduct strategic operations

What is a strategic operation?
Will a strike on Lvov with a Bulava with a nuclear warhead be considered strategic, but with a conventional warhead?

[Kaufman]

I think that the breakthrough of the APU under the raisins and the extrusion of the Russian army from Kherson can be considered a strategic operation

[Roma 1977]

What if the refusal of the Russian army to conduct strategic operations is a strategic operation? An army strategic operation will require general mobilization and a multiple increase in forces and assets in the theater of operations. But it is very costly for the economy. Therefore, the situation when, in a series of tactical operations, the enemy suffers many times greater losses while simultaneously destroying infrastructure in the depths of the territory, is probably a more acceptable option. Tentatively, Ukraine has a loss ceiling of a million people before the complete loss of defense capabilities, and NATO has its own ceiling on the waste of military resources, after reaching which either negotiations on the terms of the Russian Federation or a nuclear war will follow.

[Kaufman]

How do you compare who bears the biggest losses?

[Wedmak]

Ukraine has a loss ceiling of a million people to a complete loss of defense capabilities

If we take into account Western estimates of the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at 150, then up to a million is still a sip and a sip. And on the other hand, already now men are being caught on the streets of the square like partridges on the hunt, something seems to me the denouement is already close. Provided that the EU does not throw out some kind of trick: for example, it will drive the Poles into the 404th.

[Roma 1977]

Something is not right here. 300 tanks are too few to win a war against Russia. Without aviation, this will generally be impossible to do. And modern aviation will quickly be used up when working in the air defense zone of the Russian Federation. Wherever you throw - a wedge. Or is it they, out of desperation, crow loud slogans, behind which there is nothing?

[Constantine N]

cheap precision bombs from the US can greatly affect the capabilities of the APU. if they can destroy artillery and armored vehicles, then the matter is very difficult

[topol717]

Quote: Roma-1977

300 tanks is too few

There they argue like this, 3000 Soviet T-62s, T-64s and T-72s were not enough, just a little bit, just 10%.

[blackGRAIL]

So for Americans, the victory of Ukraine is like a nightmare. They need a protracted war, preferably without sudden movements from either side.

[Mouse]

Borrell, are you ready for the embrasure yourself? close the edge of the chest ....

[APASUS]

Some EU members and their leaders cannot be denied the skill of oratory. Even when it becomes clear that they cannot hold Ukraine, the militant rhetoric only increases.
Here the Ukrainians are already on the way, soon there will be girls, grandmothers and children. How will these speakers push the Poles into the war? Something will be blown up or someone will be poisoned ...............

[rotmistr60]

Europe will do everything possible for the victory of Ukraine in the conflict with Russia. Europe is more than ever “determined” to put an end to this conflict with a victory for Ukraine.

The European Nazi and obviously admirer of Franco itched with a vengeance. What an abomination rushing non-stop from these polished and "civilized" European people. That's for whom the scaffold has been crying for a long time.

[evgen1221]

Well, we are waiting for attacks, planes, tanks. Ukrainians are already using chemical weapons in Bakhmut.

[topol717]

I don’t understand one thing, is Europe at war with us or not?
If not, then let them step aside and not blather.
If so, why is this impudent Saxon island south of the North Sea still there, and is the Strait de Calais so narrow? The same is incomprehensible with continental Europe, the Reichstag and the Eiffel Tower, in theory, in the same way, should have been destroyed long ago. and in their place is a radioactive dump.

[Constantine N]

He fights with his hands. And if you hit Europe well, it will fly back even stronger. And the United States will benefit.

[blackGRAIL]

All this couch talk about a nuclear strike on London or Washington is utter nonsense. A nuclear strike by one nuclear power on the mother territory of another nuclear power is guaranteed to cause an illogical retaliatory strike (while the missiles of the first are still in the air). Let's launch a rocket at London and get a rocket at Moscow in response. Let's start by (conditional) Glasgow and get by (conditional) Yekaterinburg. The use of nuclear weapons is possible only on the territory of third countries - for example, tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of a logistics center in Poland will not cause a retaliatory nuclear attack on the territory of Russia, despite any NATO statements. And a NATO attack on Belarus will not lead to a nuclear strike on a NATO nuclear country (but on Poland, for example).

[Camrad]

I bet 9:1 that our hypothetical (sorry) strike on London or Faslane's Trident base will elicit absolutely no real response. If anything, I'm not quite off the couch)

[oleg-nekrasov-19]

If only they were not blown up by a strong overvoltage, "winners"

[Bingo]

Judging by the fact that even Rand, in his last review, recognized the inevitability of the liquidation of the outskirts, Borrell was stoned with a heavy

[Shket53]

For Bingo ... but where does he fart ( Borrell ) get stoned ... just senile insanity

[Ivan Ivanov]

This is a reminder to our brave negotiators and others who want to "sit out"

[Leshak]

...the task of Europe is to make sure that the Ukrainian army wins this conflict...

And the task of Russia is so that they don’t succeed. Victory will be ours, no matter how difficult it is.

[VB]

Well, how was the plane with the "leopard" shot down for Bandera? How is Putin?

[plant15]

Quote from Mitos

Europe is primarily afraid that Russia will demolish it with nuclear weapons. After such Europe will no longer be like a ball. They are ready to put everything that is possible even to fill up with weapons. They don’t need tanks and artillery to capture territories, they understand hopelessness this.

"I understand that this is not an easy decision, but at the same time, we will preserve the most important thing - the lives of servicemen and, in general, the combat capability of this group of troops, which should be kept on the right bank in a limited area. futile", - Surovikin said in his report.
https://dela.ru/lenta/277010/
"It is not given to us to predict how our word will respond," Tyutchev.
Be careful with this word, comrade.

[GREG68]

Played with Europe. Let's see what our wise leaders will answer

[Ghost1]

Remember the story when Europe constantly went to war against Russia, you think it was a long time ago and now smart and bright minds rule there who are for world peace, no, history repeats itself, what happened under Napoleon in 1812, that now these are essentially links of one chains.

[faterdom]

Surprisingly, Biden and Austin are much more careful in their statements.
And the most victorious Brothel and Stopty Berg. And why are both not in the trenches of Bakhmut? After all, the two of them could drive away the evil Prigogine from there!

[Carlos Hall]

Corrupt Catalan speaks like Brazilian parrots

[DefenderofTruth]

Ukraine's victory over Russia will look like this: