The Ukrainian military showed the result of a hit by a Russian strike drone on the M109 self-propelled guns near Artyomovsk

45
The Ukrainian military showed the result of a hit by a Russian strike drone on the M109 self-propelled guns near Artyomovsk

More and more frames appear on the network with padded or completely destroyed armored vehicles of the Armed Forces of Ukraine of NATO production in the area of ​​​​the city of Artyomovsk (Bakhmut). Trying to prevent the fall of the Bakhmut garrison, in recent weeks, attempts have been made to transfer reinforcements to the city through the only relatively accessible direction (from Chasov Yar). But after the transition of this road under the fire control of the Russian troops, the transfer of reserves for the enemy is far from always being completed successfully.

Footage appeared on the network with the evacuation of a self-propelled artillery mount from the combat area in Artyomovsk. We are talking about the 155-mm self-propelled guns M109 of American design. According to some information, earlier this artillery self-propelled gun was delivered to Ukraine from Belgium. This is a modification of the A4BE.



As the Ukrainian military themselves stated, an attack drone worked on the self-propelled guns. As can be seen from the frames, the front of the tower is a "sieve" with a huge hole. The servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, who filmed, state that the self-propelled gun was completely burned out from the inside. There is also a gaping hole in the right side of the NATO-style self-propelled gun.

A Ukrainian truck hauls away a damaged M109 self-propelled gun, apparently in the hope of its subsequent recovery. Usually, NATO military equipment is sent to Poland, neighboring Ukraine, for repairs.
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ASM
    +4
    5 February 2023 22: 17
    Does anyone know how much it costs in time / money to evacuate equipment to the Poles and return it after repair?
    1. +33
      5 February 2023 22: 20
      This is not your armor.
      This is 32mm aluminum foil. Rolled.
      After burnout (heat treatment), it will not even hold a bullet.
      So not repairable.
      1. -1
        6 February 2023 10: 49
        Well, why, you can also have a Leopold tank. From the front line to the nearest Rzeszow, about 1200 km. The cost of the "scow" is 1500 r / h, though only 20 tons, but if in parts, as scrap metal, then it will do (we take 3 cars). The average speed on highways is 60 km/h (the maximum speed is not more than 90 km/h). We divide - we multiply and ... only 90 thousand rubles one way.)
    2. +18
      5 February 2023 22: 20
      What kind of repair? Everything burned out inside. No repair will help. Here are the results of the Lancet's work. But against the Leopards, we need an analogue of the BBP Harop with a warhead of 20 kg, well, that is, with a warhead like that of the same 152 mm UAB Krasnopol.


      The result of hitting the S-300 air defense system of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Two installations stood next to each other. The defeat of one launcher led to the destruction of both. Video frame of the Russian Ministry of Defense


      Neutralized in the Bakhmut area 155-mm self-propelled guns M109A5Ö, delivered from Latvia for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Apparently, the installation was struck by the Lancet kamikaze drone, the impact point of which is visible on the hull. Also visible traces of burnout of the machine from the inside.
      1. +4
        5 February 2023 23: 46
        we need an analogue of the BBP Harop with a warhead of 20 kg

        20 kg of TNT will tear off the turret of any tank
      2. 0
        6 February 2023 23: 44
        PTAB-2,5, 2,5 kg anti-tank cumulative bomb, when it hit the roof of a WWII tank, disabled it. The thickness of the upper armor of armored vehicles has not changed much since then. There should be such warheads in the MLRS kit.
    3. +14
      5 February 2023 22: 27
      Ukraine, a financial hole in Europe and America without a bottom. This is me about the question of how much it "back and forth" costs. The amounts of injections are only announced as a fact, in fact, without restrictions. No one, no one, nothing will be returned.
      Communication routes, as has been said thousands of times, must be destroyed, not Western money counted.
      1. +10
        6 February 2023 00: 29
        Quote: Fachmann
        Ukraine, a financial hole in Europe and America without a bottom.

        And once it was a "hole" for the Russian Empire and the USSR.
    4. +4
      6 February 2023 00: 25
      Quote from A.S.M.
      Does anyone know how much it costs in time / money to evacuate equipment to the Poles and return it after repair?

      Almost as much as a new installation costs, and if the electronics are replaced, then more expensive.
    5. 0
      6 February 2023 10: 49
      From the front line to the nearest Rzeszow, about 1200 km. The cost of the "scow" is 1500 r / h, though only 20 tons, but if in parts, as scrap metal, then it will do (we take 3 cars). The average speed on highways is 60 km/h (the maximum speed is not more than 90 km/h). We divide - we multiply and ... only 90 thousand rubles one way.)
    6. 0
      6 February 2023 20: 56
      In the Second World War, burning tanks could not be repaired.
      Not in the field, not in the factory.
    7. -4
      6 February 2023 20: 57
      Quote from A.S.M.
      Does anyone know how much it costs in time / money to evacuate equipment to the Poles and return it after repair?

      I don’t know the order, but it’s definitely cheaper than dragging Russian equipment for repairs from the same Ukraine beyond the Urals.
  2. +5
    5 February 2023 22: 18
    Yes, this is nothing, the main thing is that Artemovsk "will never be handed over!" Well, perhaps two weeks after its liberation by our troops, stuffing will begin that it had no strategic value and there are still many other fortifications ahead of which the cursed Muscovites certainly grind their teeth. They don't have any other method.
    1. -1
      5 February 2023 23: 17
      Quote: voice of reason
      . They don't have any other method.

      Not yet. Most likely they are writing new ones at the moment.
  3. +3
    5 February 2023 22: 19
    I wonder where the crew was at the time of the hit? sad
    1. +1
      5 February 2023 22: 22
      He was in the Bakhmut hell, and at the moment of being hit, he moved to the real hell, to an eternal stay.
    2. +7
      5 February 2023 22: 30
      To the question: "Where was the crew?", I really wanted to answer in rhyme ...
    3. +12
      5 February 2023 23: 10
      Most likely he is still there. Hardly swept there
    4. 0
      7 February 2023 10: 56
      They fried the fat, so they burned the self-propelled guns! After all, we haven’t had drones for a long time, every Bandera member knows this!
  4. +24
    5 February 2023 22: 24
    Yes, they just took the m109 for scrap, so as not to disgrace.
    Imagine, ours will soon occupy Bakhmut and will show the cemetery of NATO equipment. The owner won't like it. Therefore, they spend resources on export.
    1. +2
      6 February 2023 11: 15
      More "lancets" good and different .. It would also be nice to have something cumulative with a shock core that the grid did not save
    2. 0
      7 February 2023 07: 03
      Quote from bombaher
      Yes, they just took the m109 for scrap, so as not to disgrace.

      There are tons of high quality aluminum! It will go to the redistribution.
  5. +3
    5 February 2023 22: 34
    I'm not sure, but it looks like it flew into the tower, not just into the hull. There were two hits, so that for sure into scrap metal - with no chance of recovery.
  6. +2
    5 February 2023 22: 39
    "Lancet" - good for counter-battery work.
    Still an anti-tank version. With a tandem warhead, albeit with a reduced range in addition to ATGMs. Not to the detriment of the production of the main version.
  7. +1
    5 February 2023 23: 02
    The same will happen with the Abrams, and with the Leopards, and with the Challengers .....
  8. +6
    5 February 2023 23: 04
    And why are kamikaze drones not used in pairs? Air defense is characterized by the launch of 2 expensive missiles at one target. The cost of the same Lancets is incommensurably lower than air defense missiles.
    1. +4
      5 February 2023 23: 14
      An experienced air defense crew manages with one missile. TTX allows. This is not the first time that the shell hits 12 targets with 12 missiles. I don't know about drones. request
      Maybe for the same reason.
    2. +2
      6 February 2023 04: 10
      Probably because they are not enough to apply even one by one. Full of goals.
  9. +5
    5 February 2023 23: 04
    Well hit! More lancets, good and different. good
  10. +36
    5 February 2023 23: 09
    The continuity of generations

    Your comment text is too short
    1. +7
      5 February 2023 23: 14
      "Fedya" with 80-mm side armor from the "Lancet" would not have died.
      1. +4
        5 February 2023 23: 26
        The Burnt Panzer 2k would be great right next to Ferdinand. It's a pity they break faster than they can be burned, they are constantly being repaired
      2. 0
        7 February 2023 00: 02
        They say that a high-explosive 152-mm projectile from an ML-20 flew into the roof of one of the Ferdinands. It was later identified by pieces of the chassis that it was Fedya.
        Another Pe-2 "treated" with an aerial bomb. With the same success.
        In fact, even "Leopard-2A7" will spread the harp across the field from such a gift. No matter how it was armored in the frontal projection.
        1. 0
          7 February 2023 07: 18
          Quote: Jager
          They say that a high-explosive 152-mm projectile from an ML-20 flew into the roof of one of the Ferdinands. It was later identified by pieces of the chassis that it was Fedya.
          Another Pe-2 "treated" with an aerial bomb. With the same success.

          The tiger was torn apart from the meeting with Stalin's sledgehammer in the tower when a 203 mm landmine landed. Such a story was even mentioned in the memoirs of some general of the Wehrmacht, if memory serves, then it was on the southern face of the Kursk salient.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  11. +3
    5 February 2023 23: 18
    How interesting. The Ukrainian side shows the loss of its own equipment. For what? Ours never show their losses. Although the Armed Forces of Ukraine just the other day posted footage of the destruction of two "Gvozdik" and "Msta" by the fire of corrected ammunition.
  12. +2
    5 February 2023 23: 26
    Let them be perverted, although maybe the hodovka will go for spare parts, and the body is color-metal anyway
  13. +4
    6 February 2023 00: 06
    Quote: Shurik70
    This is not your armor.
    This is 32mm aluminum foil. Rolled.
    After burnout (heat treatment), it will not even hold a bullet.
    So not repairable.

    There are a lot of lumines, pshekhs in metal will give money for it and they will receive it again. Or maybe xoxly themselves are aware that they can hand it over and drag it not for repair, but to buy metal
    1. 0
      6 February 2023 23: 50
      It's not pure aluminium, it's an alloy. Otherwise, these self-propelled guns would definitely not even reach Kyiv. wassat
      The BMP-3 also has aluminum armor.
  14. 0
    6 February 2023 04: 12
    This tin can is unrepairable!
  15. +1
    6 February 2023 05: 21
    Quote: igorbrsv
    This is not the first time that a shell with 12 missiles hits 12 targets

    It turns out that the percentage of hitting targets is not less than:
    12/13 = 0.923, maybe even 24/25 = 0.96

    By the way, Pantsir-S2 has already been released:
    https://dzen.ru/a/X7_4KSELMX0eldcM
  16. +3
    6 February 2023 05: 41
    Hmm...well! Very! burned well! fellow LOVE!
  17. 0
    6 February 2023 10: 54
    Quote: VladimirNET

    By the way, Pantsir-S2 has already been released:
    https://dzen.ru/a/X7_4KSELMX0eldcM


    They write: "The 30-mm automatic cannon makes it an effective weapon against aircraft, cruise missiles, helicopters, anti-radar missiles, ballistic missiles and even artillery shells."

    Does anyone know if there are facts of the destruction of artillery shells?
    1. +2
      6 February 2023 21: 02
      Quote from Emperor_Alive
      Does anyone know if there are facts of the destruction of artillery shells?

      Brad from the realm of non-science fiction.
  18. 0
    6 February 2023 23: 47
    Looks like they were aiming at the tower, but in order not to miss they took a little lower. The canned food burned out anyway. Hopefully, along with a trained crew of foreign mercenaries.
  19. -1
    10 February 2023 16: 30
    Quote: Prjanik
    The continuity of generations


    Great collage!
    These are the photos that advertising stands 6×3m in Moscow should be decorated with!