An enemy grenade launcher ricocheted off a Russian tank turret

89
An enemy grenade launcher ricocheted off a Russian tank turret

Footage was posted on the Internet showing close combat of the Russian Armed Forces during a special operation. On them you can observe how the enemy’s grenade launcher shot ricocheted off the tower of the Russian tank.

This was reported by the Telegram channel "Two Majors".



The footage shows an image of the scene of the clash, which was filmed from drone. Everything that happens is commented on by a voice-over belonging to the UAV operator. Unfortunately, his comments were generously flavored with non-literary language, so this video is not here.

Now Russian armored vehicles in the combat zone are accompanied by drones, which allows you to better assess the situation on the battlefield.

This time, the UAV operator noticed a group of Ukrainian infantrymen. He immediately said that they were armed only with small arms. weapons. But then an observer noticed a grenade launcher on one of the fighters. A Russian tank approaching them opened fire on the group, after which it continued to move to the right of their position. It seems that there was no connection with the drone operator, since the combat vehicle did not iron the enemy, but moved to the right, allowing the grenade launcher to strike from behind. During this maneuver, the UAV operator loudly warned the crew of the danger, but his words were ignored or not heard.

Fortunately, the grenade launcher ricocheted off the turret of the Russian tank without harming it. And on the tower, only the engine was left to burn out from a grenade launcher.


89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -6
    3 February 2023 13: 03
    The grenade launcher of the wrong system turned out to be .......
    1. +45
      3 February 2023 13: 14
      The guys were really lucky, he was clearly aiming at the tower, but inexperience played its part. But again, there is a problem with the connection. And it almost cost the guys their lives.
      1. +21
        3 February 2023 13: 21
        In a good way, in modern warfare, a drone should accompany each piece of equipment.
        1. +17
          3 February 2023 13: 43
          And that's the point. There is a drone, but there is no communication and interaction with the tank. He drove 5 meters from the grenade launcher and received a shot from 15-20 meters, thank God he didn’t hit.
          1. +3
            4 February 2023 09: 42
            Moreover, in the video, repeated attempts by the drone operator to transmit information to the tank are heard, but in the tank, as in the tank - the connection is complete shit.
            1. +3
              4 February 2023 11: 12
              The operator does not transmit information to the tank, but to the command post of his unit. But from the command post they had to quickly transfer information to the tankers
              1. Eug
                0
                6 February 2023 14: 47
                As for me, it would be right if the drone operator, along with communication with his command post, would have a communication channel directly with the tankers or that
                the crew heard the operator's conversations with the CP; so that the crew could ask the operator to view a particular area in more detail.
                It is possible for the drone operator to be at the tank CP when solving the issue of controlling the drone through a repeater - so that the enemy does not locate the CP.
            2. 0
              4 February 2023 19: 23
              And how can the drone operator transfer information to the tank?
          2. 0
            4 February 2023 11: 24
            Yes, communication is our eternal problem, and the situation is bad, this infantry turned out to be ours, it’s good that no one has failed anyone. Loss of control of units usually leads to "friendly fire", and it's good if everything goes without losses.
            According to the video, the fact that it was ours was written on the Military Chronicle website.
          3. +2
            4 February 2023 22: 10
            Of course, I am not a pro, but the question constantly torments me: why do tanks drive alone ?! belay not a unit, at least a platoon! Unaccompanied by infantry? Full of videos where the tank operates alone at all! No.
            1. 0
              6 February 2023 12: 25
              Quote: Eroma
              Of course, I am not a pro, but the question constantly torments me: why do tanks drive alone ?!

              apparently, those who accompanied the tank fell behind for one reason or another, and the tank was without communication ... and so it remains alone ...... (((((
        2. +3
          3 February 2023 14: 00
          Accompanying is one thing, but having a stable connection is another.
          For good, for new equipment: T-14,15, Kurganets, Boomerang - the drone should enter the state and display the image on the commander's screen.
          Ps. The video looks more like the crew of the tank - noticed the enemy, fired and considered them destroyed.
        3. +1
          3 February 2023 14: 41
          Quote: Bearded
          In a good way, in modern warfare, a drone should accompany each piece of equipment.

          In the event that it works separately from the main unit.
        4. 0
          5 February 2023 12: 19
          Quote: Bearded
          the drone must accompany each piece of equipment.

          It sounds nice and tempting, but ... each drone will require an appropriate operator. So, unfortunately, it never will be. But the connection, which we traditionally have none ... our designers and engineers should work and work on this. For it has long been said, "Communication is the nerves of the Army."
          1. 0
            6 February 2023 16: 49
            Quote: Clone
            It sounds nice and tempting, but ... every drone will need an appropriate operator

            It’s not difficult to make an autopilot for a drone at all
    2. +14
      3 February 2023 14: 27
      The grenade did not have time to cock. She left the grenade launcher under the action of an expelling charge, did not have time to cock, hit the turret, collapsed, the engine remained warhead thrown away ... What a terrible intensity of battles ...
  2. +16
    3 February 2023 13: 04
    It's a miracle! The crew of our tank in a shirt was born, apparently the Lord himself saved, because the truth is on our side.
    1. +10
      3 February 2023 13: 21
      The Lord provided the grenade launcher with covered hands and an eyesore .. I would have hit lower .... But there are questions about adjustment and communication on the battlefield ..
      1. +4
        3 February 2023 13: 46
        But how can I tell you, the tank practically rode on them, and fired a shot directly next to their position. In such a situation, not everyone can do what needs to be able to.

        A military instructor at school told how he ran tanks around a soldier. At the training ground, while studying with their own, not everyone dared to pass under a tank.
      2. +3
        3 February 2023 16: 52
        Here is a question. Why is a tank without infantry? And the fact that the warrior missed, I think he was shell-shocked.
    2. 0
      6 February 2023 12: 26
      Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
      the Lord himself saved, because the truth is on our side.

      But what about those of ours whom the Lord did not save?
  3. +42
    3 February 2023 13: 04
    No need to take care of us without publishing a video with vocabulary, you can remove the sound if you are so thin and impressionable
    1. +35
      3 February 2023 13: 07
      I didn't even finish reading the text.. I got scared! What if I see a mat and read it? I'm an impressionable person
  4. +6
    3 February 2023 13: 05
    not having a telegram, look at the hell. upload video please
    1. +1
      3 February 2023 13: 18
      by the way
      in general, only our tanks have "stationary" turret protection on top in the form of a visor
      there was a case in the NWO,
      hit of a 152-mm projectile in the visor of the T-72B3 turret - without breaking through the roof of the tower
      originally conceived from the Javelin ATGM - and how it turned out
      1. +10
        3 February 2023 13: 24
        I don’t believe about the projectile .. And the visor is not from "tou" protection, but from "javelin"
        1. +1
          3 February 2023 14: 50
          the visor on our T-72B3 and T-90M tanks is better than nothing
          western Leopards, Abrams, Leclercs, Challengers - generally without protective
          especially from our anti-roof anti-tank mines PTKM-1R
    2. +30
      3 February 2023 13: 23
      not having a telegram, look at the hell. upload video please

      1. +9
        3 February 2023 13: 30
        Thank you! close too for the seven was. didn't get up. and again there is no connection!
        well it's not at4.
      2. -4
        3 February 2023 13: 32
        there was a hit, the cumulative jet formed and went tangentially up - lucky
        1. +5
          3 February 2023 13: 34
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          there was a hit, the cumulative jet formed and went tangentially up - lucky

          No. the grenade didn't even go off. struck and flew away, leaving a tail with a tracer
      3. +5
        3 February 2023 13: 47
        Thank you for the vocabulary video
        .................................
      4. +2
        3 February 2023 15: 04
        Eat your bite! And I really thought that there was something awkward with the obscenity! Just super. mat ... terrible and terrible! belay And here it is quite "usually"! request Now the kids of the younger group in kindergarten swear so much! wink And thanks for the video! "I'm impressed"! It looks like the tankers didn’t really see the sold-out! I remembered Terkin when he "comments" on the instruction on fighting tanks ... they say the tank is blind near ...! Is the tank blind? Hmmm...! I’m lying in a trench ... and my heart is beating! Suddenly, how blindly will crush?! After all, he does not see a damn thing!
        I also remembered the modern "fashionable" concept in tank building ... "Transparent armor"! At present, they are intensively doing this in Israel ... If memory serves, then they are seriously interested in such "weight" in the USA ... But I can’t remember anything Russian right now!
    3. 0
      4 February 2023 09: 06
      There is on the Zen, there is at Mikhail Onufrienko, you just have to look and the cart is not needed.
  5. +12
    3 February 2023 13: 07
    if you watch this video, then the main point there is that the infantry has no connection with the tank
    the infantry from the copter saw everything and could not warn
    and the fact that there was a rebound is luck that the RPG casually passed
    the video clearly demonstrates the problem of horizontal communication between units in the army
    and what did the admiral generals, who regularly speak on Solovyov-TV, do - this is a question, as well as to all those involved in the General Staff
    and such publications on in are a shame to the author
    1. +9
      3 February 2023 13: 36
      and such publications on in are a shame to the author

      Is it the author of the article and the editor of the site who are to blame for the bad communication in the army?
      1. 0
        3 February 2023 14: 35
        to the author, for not revealing the topic
        Your comment text is too short
    2. +2
      3 February 2023 16: 01
      I watched the video, I didn’t like how the tank was driving, but it was driving as if by itself without control
      1. 0
        6 February 2023 12: 37
        Quote: Graz
        I watched the video, I didn’t like how the tank was driving,

        hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
        Two mushroom pickers got lost. Barely moving their legs, they went to the edge.
        And there is an ensign. They ask him:
        - Comrade military, are we going to the station correctly?
        - Yes, which one is correct? The ankle wobbles, the kick of the foot is not clear,
        and yes, it's out of step...
        )))))))))))))))))
    3. 0
      5 February 2023 17: 12
      What about the author? Everyone understands the problems, but your author turned out to be guilty. Marvelous.
  6. +3
    3 February 2023 13: 08
    I'm not a military man, but maybe someone knows - an RPG shot when it gets on a combat platoon after a shot? Well, i.e. Is there a minimum distance at which it won't work?
    1. +2
      3 February 2023 13: 13
      Yes, and there are different shots from a grenade launcher, not only cumulative ones.
    2. +3
      3 February 2023 13: 31
      RPG-7 grenade will explode only after 15 meters of flight. This is also very useful, otherwise you will blow yourself up several times before the enemy even comes into view.
  7. +4
    3 February 2023 13: 12
    I do not know the tactics of the tankers, but it seems to me that the tank should not attack alone, either the second tank or the BMP should help.
    1. +4
      3 February 2023 14: 24
      BMPT "Terminator". Didn't you see him in the frame? And he is. :)
      But seriously, it's a hand-face. No matter how many videos I watch, mostly 1-2 tanks. Any tankers here? Enlighten what kind of tactic is this - offensive by single machines? Nanostorm?
      1. 0
        4 February 2023 11: 00
        In the BMPT "terminator" there is no place for landing, or even for the evacuation of the crew of an escorted, supported tank.
  8. +6
    3 February 2023 13: 15
    Climbed to the Two Majors to watch the video. And there THIS


    Oh, Cossacks, Cossacks...
    Real Europeans
    1. 0
      3 February 2023 17: 09
      I have never read anywhere that someone was punished for this, but I read a lot. But it is known for sure that women were not allowed into the Zaporizhzhya Sich - and this, as it were, hints ... laughing
    2. 0
      4 February 2023 03: 21
      Quote: sergo1914
      Climbed to the Two Majors to watch the video. And there THIS
      laughing
      THIS asks for help wassat
      You can support Gender Zed by issuing a bank order:
      Name: GENDER ZED
      Payer code: 37526950
      Payer's bank: ZAPORIZKE RU AT CB “PRIVATBANK”, bank code 313399
      Rahunok: UA933133990000026007060757968
      Assigned to payment: Charity deposit
      If you want to transfer in US dollars ($ USD) or euros (€ EUR), click here.

      I only list THIS for the funeral - join drinks
  9. +1
    3 February 2023 13: 26
    When attacking the field fortifications of enemy infantry, our infantry must go / ride on a par with or immediately after armored vehicles (especially since the pace of the shown attack was low). And here it turns out that the crew did not notice the enemy infantry in the trenches, and simply continued the direction of the attack. In the case of a battle only with enemy equipment, or separate fortifications, this is possible, but when attacking through saturated and camouflaged trenches, I think it is unacceptable.
  10. +11
    3 February 2023 13: 33
    There’s no need to rejoice here, but on the contrary, those who watched the video from the cart know what I’m talking about, the connection is at the level of 41-42 years, or rather there is no connection with the tank, it’s lucky that the khokh.ol hand-ass and oblique, I remembered the video where our soldier was crushed by a tank Ukrainians corrected from a drone, and everything was fine with them with communications. Where did they spend the billions allocated for the archer, etc.? Generally not a secret.
    1. +8
      3 February 2023 14: 09
      Rukoshop, not rukoshop, but when a tank shot over your ear and drove past, getting up and answering is hard enough, to put it mildly
  11. +5
    3 February 2023 13: 33
    Where is the stable connection with the tank ???? What a mess. Nearly lost three people
  12. +7
    3 February 2023 13: 37
    Watched the video. It seems to me that the distance was too small and the charge of the shot did not have time to get on the combat platoon. Yes, and hit on a tangent. Tankers are just lucky.
  13. +2
    3 February 2023 13: 46
    The tankers were just lucky, it’s not the coolness of our tank, but the crankiness of the grenade launcher, I couldn’t aim normally from 50 meters.
    At the same time, it is not entirely clear why they do not hear warnings in the tank from an observer from a drone, who throughout the entire video yells at them where the dills are sitting and that they are being targeted from a grenade launcher.
    You can't really see or hear it in the photo, but in the video...
    In a word, that day the guardian angel sat over the engine of the tank.
    Previously, it was somehow customary to coordinate frequencies by communication before the start of the nomination, is something wrong now?
  14. +5
    3 February 2023 13: 49
    There is not enough evil from such a video, the grenade does not seem to have been cocked, it is too close.
    1. +2
      3 February 2023 13: 56
      There, even the engine did not burn out, it burned out on the hatch
  15. +1
    3 February 2023 13: 51
    There was a similar howl about six months ago, a manure shot from a window at point-blank range, with the same result.
    1. +1
      3 February 2023 14: 02
      There was like a javelin
      ..........................
      1. +3
        3 February 2023 15: 10
        Quote: Citatelle 2013
        There was like a javelin

        NLAW................................................... ................................................. ................................................. .............
    2. +1
      3 February 2023 14: 06
      Yes, if I'm not mistaken during the liberation of Mariupol, only there was an English grenade launcher
      1. +1
        3 February 2023 15: 11
        Quote: sanja.grw
        if I'm not mistaken during the liberation of Mariupol, only there was an English grenade launcher

        Exactly ! ................................................. ................................................. ...
        1. +1
          3 February 2023 16: 31
          NLAW is a Swedish grenade launcher developed by SAAB.
    3. +1
      3 February 2023 14: 20
      There seemed to be some kind of foreign stray. NLAW type. Because he shot from the window. And she's pretty complex. Azovets seems to have set the wrong regime. And the shot didn't fire.
      1. +1
        3 February 2023 15: 14
        Quote: Single-n
        There seemed to be some kind of foreign stray. NLAW type. Because he shot from the window. And she's pretty complex. Azovets seems to have set the wrong regime. And the shot didn't fire.

        The ammunition is cocked after 20 meters ... the distance to the tank turned out to be less ...
  16. +1
    3 February 2023 13: 56
    According to the mind, there should be a video broadcast from the tank commander. The drone operator outside shows the picture to the tank crew and marks the targets.
    But since the tank is the most common and the drones are civilian, then there is no question of any special equipment, especially software equipment, of this or that equipment. It's all sad.
    The tank commander himself could act as an operator. To equip any modification of the tank with a nest with a drone, a monitor and communication, you don’t need a lot of mind. If only someone would do it. It is not expensive.
    1. -1
      3 February 2023 15: 30
      Quote: Mint Gingerbread
      To equip any modification of the tank with a nest with a drone, a monitor and communication, you don’t need a lot of mind. If only someone would do it. It is not expensive.

      Now tank builders are engaged in the concept of "transparent (or situational ...) armor" ... This is when the tank is "stuck around" with video cameras, sensors that allow tankers (at least the tank commander) to see "the whole area around themselves" as if he is on top of the armor !
      1. 0
        3 February 2023 16: 38
        Many luxury, civilian cars, foreign manufacturers, have long been equipped with a 360-degree view. They have digital vision, understand the dimensions and speed of objects, types of objects, distance to objects. They know how to park and drive themselves. And it's not even military equipment. laughing

        That's what armored vehicles lack, good airborne AI. He must be able to identify the target and understand who or what it is (manpower or equipment), track the location and distance, remember the location of the target, track the movement of the target, etc.
        The tank launched a drone from its nest, which illuminated everything it could identify and transferred it on board. The gun was aimed at the marks of the drone and destroyed the targets. The future to be developed.
  17. +4
    3 February 2023 14: 02
    The head of the radio engineering troops of the Russian Aerospace Forces, General Koban, was removed from his post due to corruption
    This is a TASS message dated January 14th.
    Here is the answer why we do not have communications in the troops.
    1. 0
      3 February 2023 14: 49
      how simple are you...
      short, short... we know, we love, we remember
  18. +3
    3 February 2023 14: 09
    What was it now? Is this an interaction? Ah people. Yes, the fact that the tank, in principle, drove up to such a distance with the enemy group is already a polar fox. There, the enemy could have anything. From RPGs to banal lighters. The tank at such a distance does not see them and cannot do anything. Only if you try to push into the blind. The operator of the campaign cannot contact the crew himself and communicates through an intermediary. And it’s good if through one, judging by the lack of reaction from the crew.
    K.- Coordination, the strong side of the RF Armed Forces. Why the hell do we need an UAV if infa doesn’t reach the soldiers? For headquarters vids?
    And the tankers were very lucky. What exactly saved them. Tolley ricochets, or maybe the grenade did not have time to cock. I xs from what and with what that fighter shot. There is such a zoo in arms.
  19. +1
    3 February 2023 14: 13
    Quote: Bearded
    In a good way, in modern warfare, a drone should accompany each piece of equipment.

    yes, it is probably so ... only communication problems are bad ....
  20. +1
    3 February 2023 14: 14
    Quote: 16112014nk
    The head of the radio engineering troops of the Russian Aerospace Forces, General Koban, was removed from his post due to corruption
    This is a TASS message dated January 14th.
    Here is the answer why we do not have communications in the troops.

    Perhaps this is the answer to many questions ....
    1. +2
      3 February 2023 15: 23
      As far as I remember, his deputy distinguished himself there by stealing about 6 billion. On the purchase of radios.
  21. +3
    3 February 2023 14: 33
    We do not know all the details of the battle. But the question is, why does a tank climb alone without infantry support? To hell with a Ukrainian grenade launcher so unrestrained if our tank was covered by a squad of motorized riflemen.
  22. +2
    3 February 2023 14: 36
    On the plus side, luck, which very often plays the most significant role in war. On the downside, reconnaissance missed the enemy infantry, and our fighters do not support the tank. If they filmed from our UAV, then the lack of communication is depressing. Our guys win and a possible minimum of losses. Banderlog is glassy earth.
  23. 0
    3 February 2023 14: 59
    The communication disconnect could be due to electronic warfare suppression on that channel
  24. +1
    3 February 2023 15: 27
    The issue of the lack of communications is very relevant, but there is a second question about how this tank ended up there without infantry support and communications. Another question is why this small group of infantry was not suppressed by artillery fire, or at least an AGS or something else small. Why the hell did you have to drive a tank there like that?
  25. +2
    3 February 2023 15: 33
    This is not a tactic. This is sending tankers to slaughter. Once lucky, how many times unlucky?
  26. +1
    3 February 2023 19: 38
    Unfortunately, his comments were generously flavored with non-literary language, so this video is not here.

    As soon as I hear a mate, I immediately faint.
    The maximum that I can stand is the sight of corpses side by side in Sladkov's reports hi
  27. 0
    4 February 2023 05: 28
    The connection of the drone operator with the participants in the battle must be 100 percent ... our military should work on this.
  28. +1
    4 February 2023 07: 44
    And without sound, it was weak to post a video.
  29. 0
    4 February 2023 10: 24
    It is very sad that communications have not yet been established, there is no interdepartmental interaction.
    Here is an analogy, we all invested in a house as a country, and we come back after 8 years and there is no foundation and there is no one to ask.
  30. 0
    4 February 2023 11: 19
    And if he hadn't rebounded? The boys stepped up. A successful sector chose a brute, but you can see it jumped from excitement or a newcomer overwhelmed.
  31. 0
    4 February 2023 12: 25
    He did not recoil, it was just a crooked grenade launcher from 30 meters that he could not hit. He went to the campaign along the flag for firing at a great distance. That's why I got into some kind of crap over the tower.
  32. 0
    4 February 2023 18: 04
    Quote: Dost
    Here is a question. Why is a tank without infantry? And the fact that the warrior missed, I think he was shell-shocked.


    I repeated it more than once, for which I was constantly minus. Why is there only one tank? Where is his platoon, company? The tank will be hit and immediately the tank against the infantry group will turn into 3 wounded tankers against the infantry squad.
  33. -1
    4 February 2023 19: 55
    I saw this video a couple of days ago. It was just a description.
    This is a unique video about what happens in the war. Firstly, due to poor coordination, our tank opened fire in the direction of our own infantry, secondly, the tank did not seem to see the infantry under its nose, and thirdly, the infantry fired at the tank from RPG-7, but because of the excitement a grenade launcher shot hit the very edge of the tower and it even seems to have a partial rebound. As a result, everyone is alive, but it is clearly seen how important communication and interaction is so that their own people are not beaten.
    The infantry occupied the positions of the Ukrainians and cleared them out. Another unit launched an attack on the Ukrainian Armed Forces in approximately the same area, not knowing that there was already infantry from another unit there. There is no connection between the "neighbors", which military correspondents have written about more than once, each is fighting on his own. Mess and confusion in some places.
  34. 0
    4 February 2023 23: 47
    With the composition of the tank was their guardian angel. Guys, God bless you, long life and health!!!!
  35. 0
    25 September 2023 11: 31
    And why then do you need a drone if there is no connection?
    In general, it wouldn’t hurt for all our tanks to have an all-round visibility system. The same as on the T-90M tank.