Trump: Washington should negotiate peace in Ukraine, not just provide military assistance to Kyiv

13
Trump: Washington should negotiate peace in Ukraine, not just provide military assistance to Kyiv

Former US President Donald Trump, who officially announced his desire to fight for a return to the White House in the upcoming elections the day before, again criticized the Biden administration for excessive support for Ukraine. He believes that Washington should negotiate peace in Ukraine, and not just provide military assistance to Kyiv. Trump made the corresponding statement in an interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt, answering a question about the possibility of supplying Kyiv with F-16 fighter jets.

I think the US should negotiate peace between these two countries and I don't think they should send too much. They must negotiate for peace

Trump stated his position.



The former president added that he considers the conflict in Ukraine more a matter for Europeans than for Americans. At the same time, the United States spends many times more on helping Kyiv than European countries, and this is unfair, Trump said.

Europe needs to do a lot more because Europe probably only does a small fraction of what we do

- said the former head of the White House, adding that he would like to make sure that Ukraine and Russia "fight for the last time."

Previously, Trump has repeatedly criticized the policy of the current president regarding the huge military assistance to the Kyiv regime and argued that if he were the head of state, then the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine would not have started. He also stated that by returning to the White House he would be able to end the military confrontation between Moscow and Kyiv within 24 hours. The ex-president of the United States does not agree with the decision of the Biden administration to send American Tanksbelieving that this would lead to a further escalation of hostilities and could cause a nuclear catastrophe.

It should be noted that during his presidency, Donald Trump turned out to be the only head of the American state in recent decades, under which the United States did not initiate a single military conflict. Therefore, American voters are unlikely to be able to accuse him of hypocrisy about calls for a peaceful end to the conflict in Ukraine. True, it is difficult to attribute Trump to the category of "doves of peace", since it was he who unilaterally withdrew the United States from the deal with Iran on the nuclear program, and it was he who gave orders for missile attacks on Syria after the fakes of a notorious organization about an alleged chemical attack carried out troops of Bashar al-Assad.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    3 February 2023 13: 14
    That is, in other words: "trying to force Minsk-3 on the Russians"
    1. +1
      3 February 2023 13: 20
      Quote: oleg-nekrasov-19
      That is, in other words: "trying to force Minsk-3 on the Russians"

      The dream of the entire Western camarilla is to impose a bonded world on Russia, tying her hand and foot.
      1. +1
        3 February 2023 13: 23
        Danila Trumpov is unlikely to receive the Nobel Peace Prize, because it is given only to bloody tyrants and savage executioners.
  2. 0
    3 February 2023 13: 19
    And I think that if the United States sat exactly on its own continent, neither this, nor many previous wars would exist at all!
  3. 0
    3 February 2023 13: 20
    By the time he gets to the White House, if he does, a lot of water will have flown away and a lot will have changed in theater. Then we'll see what he can offer, 20% is no longer relevant.
  4. 0
    3 February 2023 13: 22
    Trump: Washington should negotiate peace in Ukraine, not just provide military assistance to Kyiv
    Talking about peace, with minke whales... a tough question request
    With them, as with a venerable thief, they "talked" and immediately check all the pockets, be sure, they will assign / grab something, yours!
    And this despite the fact that they can’t talk \ negotiate with us the way they used to talk with almost everyone else, no matter how much they would like to ... angry
  5. 0
    3 February 2023 13: 38
    And what does the United States have to do with Ukraine? Why did they take on the role of arbitrator? Ukraine is not a NATO member and not a US state, why did they decide to flex their muscles near the borders of Russia? After all, it’s not Russia that is moving towards their borders, but they, again, they organize the economic blockade of Russia again ((((It’s necessary, oh, they need to clean up the African-American-Irish .......
  6. 0
    3 February 2023 13: 38
    The former president added that he considers the conflict in Ukraine more a matter for Europeans than for Americans. At the same time, the United States spends many times more on helping Kyiv than European countries, and this is unfair, Trump said.
    So far, the United States manages to implement its plans, to draw Europe into the confrontation with Russia to such an extent that the conflict continues without their participation, and to switch its attention to China. good
  7. 0
    3 February 2023 13: 38
    Trump said something about the supply of f-16s to Ukraine.
    Again, there will be deliveries, since Ukraine is the case when Europe will not give back and stop supporting (they will not forgive themselves for this). And Europe will be in a hurry while Putin is president, because they know how to put pressure on him and his actions are predictable.
  8. +1
    3 February 2023 13: 38
    Europe needs to do a lot more because Europe probably only does a small fraction of what we do
    By this statement, Trump is immediately recognizable - America is above all, already tired of paying for everyone, and who in Europe is crying that we give him little candy (like Merkel). The man is right in his own way - why throw out tens of billions is not clear for what, when they can be used for your own benefit (USA). At the beginning of his presidency, Trump had an idea to crush Russia not by confrontation, but to try to strangle it in his arms - cheaper and safer. Even if it didn't work out, he wouldn't be very upset.
  9. -1
    3 February 2023 14: 32
    argued that if he had been the head of state, then the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine would not have started. He also stated that by returning to the White House he would be able to end the military confrontation between Moscow and Kyiv within 24 hours.


    laughing
    A free translation of Trump's speech: ... I would have worked it out with Vovka and agreed on everything right away. He's the right guy and would certainly listen to me...
  10. 0
    3 February 2023 14: 34
    I want to impose Minsk 3 and at the same time push all the costs to the EU and glory and nishtyaki to myself. Although Trump sincerely wants changes in his country and sees idiotic waste, he also refuses to refuse a gram of status, America’s influence in principle. And this is the problem of the worldview of the states. You will have to refuse from a lot of things in order to regain America's former trust in the world, as it is wasted. And with spending, there are problems, because the machine is already cracking from the pressure, and there are already few who want to take on inflation and hump for air, there remains dictate, and this destroys trust and aggravates, and the former greatness and exclusivity stop stopping, and horror lies ahead. And what to do in order to sit and continue to eat fish in three throats and command at the same time, is decidedly incomprehensible. And the deaf isolation a la the new Edo period, this is not about America (although this is the only real way out for them).
  11. 0
    4 February 2023 22: 40
    He will come to power, immediately change his shoes, the line of the party of the Rothschilds and Morgans is as straight as the meanders of the Green

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"