The Swiss press published dubious material about the statement of the CIA director on the "US readiness to recognize 20 percent of the territory of Ukraine for Russia"

16
The Swiss press published dubious material about the statement of the CIA director on the "US readiness to recognize 20 percent of the territory of Ukraine for Russia"

The Swiss press published an article that provides some data on the trip of CIA Director William Burns to Kyiv and his further negotiations with representatives of the Russian special services. Recall that Burns' visit to the Ukrainian capital was not announced, but then the American media wrote about him without giving any key details. Then the press outlined general language in the form that the director of the CIA “promised Ukraine further support, noting that the allocated $45 billion could be enough until about the summer of 2023, and then it will become increasingly difficult to agree on new large military aid packages in the United States.”

Now the Swiss publication NZZ writes that the initiative to send the CIA director to Kyiv, and then to negotiate with the leadership of the Russian special services, came from US President Joe Biden. In this newspaper, the authors claim that Biden allegedly wanted to avoid prolonging the war in Ukraine. This may be due to the fact that in the event of a protracted armed conflict, Washington will again have to allocate multibillion-dollar funds to Ukraine, which in the pre-election year will turn out to be a “bad asset” for the Democratic Party. Republicans can use this subpoena to get their candidate to win the presidential race.



In a dubious material, NZZ writes that William Burns allegedly told the Russian leadership that the US authorities "do not mind the fact that about 20% of the territory of Ukraine was ceded to Russia in exchange for peace." Allegedly, the United States was ready to recognize these territories as Russia.

After it was stated that "such a plan of the White House failed, and Biden had to decide on the supply of tanks».

At the same time, Swiss journalists do not write who exactly rejected the "Biden plan" with those "20 percent of Ukraine", if there was such a plan at all. All this as a whole resembles a Western information campaign aimed at justifying the supply of heavy equipment to Kyiv, including those very tanks. In this regard, all kinds of materials may appear about "Washington's constructive plans", which did not come true, allegedly "against Washington's desire for peace."
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    16 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +8
      February 3 2023
      The Swiss press published dubious material about the statement of the CIA director on the "US readiness to recognize 20 percent of the territory of Ukraine for Russia"
      fool fool It's not about recognizing territories. And in the security of Russia, not in guarantees, but in real security (denazification). And the territory is a referendum and go with your European opinion - the forest. angry
      1. +1
        February 3 2023
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        go with your European opinion - forest

        And even if the opinion of the "Swiss press" were the official opinion of Switzerland - even in this case, I do not see who could be interested in this opinion.
        1. +1
          February 4 2023
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          And even if the opinion of the "Swiss press" were the official opinion of Switzerland - even in this case, I do not see who could be interested in this opinion.

          It was very interesting to the leadership of the Russian Federation in March-April, and even later. For this, and gestures of "good will" with regroupings for the sake of Mazepa and his ammonia. It just seems that something has changed in the Kremlin's plans ... or the realization has come that the partners will "throw" - as always, and the goal of these unkind people is not just "the defeat of Russia on the battlefield", but "the final solution to the Russian question" ... and feeding her (RF) leadership ... to pigs. And by no means portable.
          And so they decided to fight.
          And it’s scary to fight former partners. They would have to intimidate, crush economically, fool the natives with false promises and "obligations" ... But fighting is scary.
          And elections.
          And then there's Trump.
          That's why the hysteria - with tanks, aircraft, long-range missiles ... "one step forward, two steps back."
          So now the Kremlin is not interested in this.
          And if this is true , then ... then we will win .
          Because ONLY betrayal of ... the Kremlin can lead to our defeat.
    2. +6
      February 3 2023
      US authorities "are not opposed to the fact that about 20% of the territory of Ukraine went to Russia in exchange for peace."
      The material in NZZ is really dubious, but I wonder why it came out and now? For the world community to know that the United States is pursuing exclusively peaceful plans, and new arms deliveries are justified by the fact that these plans were rejected? Americans often use the world's media to probe public opinion, to prepare the public before the implementation of their planned plans, which are far from peaceful. In any case, the appearance of this article is not accidental.
    3. +6
      February 3 2023
      Yes, 20 percent of Europe is better than the United States, and the rest is for us.
      The State Department, in the spirit of the best cowboy westerns, threw a bait to the Indians ... that is, the Russians ... they will bite, they won’t bite on this carrot. smile
    4. +3
      February 3 2023
      The material is questionable, but not random.
      1. +5
        February 3 2023
        Quote: Pavel73
        The material is questionable, but not random.

        It's a poker game...I don't see anything new in US actions. smile
        1. 0
          February 3 2023
          Quote: Lech from Android.
          Quote: Pavel73
          The material is questionable, but not random.

          It's a poker game...I don't see anything new in US actions. smile

          I have always believed that the main thing in poker is not a good card. And not some special skill in the game.
          The main thing is how you behave at the table.
          Well, in the "throw" the whole game is in dynamics - the cards are taken, the cards are discarded, they are taken again - the cards move ... And in poker they looked at the cards, put them - and here the main game begins.

          Only something tells me that the United States does not have a strong card, a "sledgehammer", and they do not know how to bluff from the word "not a damn thing."
    5. +2
      February 3 2023
      The 20% offer (not including the LDNR and even more so the Crimea) would probably have worked in March-April 2022. At least as a starting point for negotiations. And now only 100%. Well, maybe minus Galicia, let the psheks have crap from the frenzied yellow-blooded Galicians.
      1. +2
        February 3 2023
        If the Poles with the Romanians and Hungarians themselves and wring out what. And to hell with him. If only they could control this population and there was no more fascist Ukraine. The rest is for us. And hands off. And let them not count on Odessa and Nikolaev. Too bad it doesn't matter to me. Some dreams
    6. +3
      February 3 2023
      That is, the United States is ready to recognize what the Russian Federation had a year ago before the NWO? What a smart dude :)
      You can't trust the West.
      They all admit without exception that they signed all the latest agreements with us to delay time, to build up strength and so on. :)
      Why believe them?
      Now only the right of the strong remains.
    7. Hey
      +1
      February 3 2023
      The main thing is that ours would not fall for it. The United States freezes the conflict in this way, even persuades Kyiv, while giving time for a respite, pumping Ukraine with weapons, and not just junk, but modern types, training hp. owning it. If now the Armed Forces of Ukraine often dig simple trenches and build simple defensive lines, then with the advent of free time they will build solid ones. And then, having become stronger, Kyiv will break the agreements and will again fight, destroying the rebuilt and revived, and it will no longer be possible to enter as in February 2022. More blood will be shed. And it’s not a fact that ours will prepare in the same way, but on the contrary, they will rest on their laurels and restore broken ties with the West. Another option Kyiv is persuaded and it cedes these 20% of the territory, then joins NATO and it ends up on our border 500 km from Moscow. Both options are unacceptable for us, only a complete and unconditional victory.
      1. +1
        February 3 2023
        Quote: MUD
        The main thing is that ours would not fall for it. The United States freezes the conflict in this way, even persuades Kyiv, while giving time for a respite, pumping Ukraine with weapons, and not just junk, but modern types, training hp. owning it. If now the Armed Forces of Ukraine often dig simple trenches and build simple defensive lines, then with the advent of free time they will build solid ones. And then, having become stronger, Kyiv will break the agreements and will again fight, destroying the rebuilt and revived, and it will no longer be possible to enter as in February 2022. More blood will be shed. And it’s not a fact that ours will prepare in the same way, but on the contrary, they will rest on their laurels and restore broken ties with the West. Another option is persuading Kyiv and it cedes these 20% of the territory, then joins NATO and it ends up on our side. border 500 km from Moscow. Both options are unacceptable for us, only a complete and unconditional victory.
        we have NATO and so nearby. Or did you forget Limitrofov?
    8. +1
      February 3 2023
      Classic cover operation. informational noise. Boring.
    9. +1
      February 3 2023
      Nothing new, the striped ones are selling air, trying to sell us what is already ours.
    10. 0
      February 4 2023
      You can, perhaps, agree to 20%, provided that the rest of Ukraine is divided into 4-5 independent states, their “mova” is different, probably this is not a single people, but ancient independent peoples oppressed by the Ragul. Eat your own recipe, superhumans, don't choke.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"