Ex-head of Roskosmos Rogozin announced the arrival of four Marker combat robots in Donbass

91
Ex-head of Roskosmos Rogozin announced the arrival of four Marker combat robots in Donbass

Four fighting Robot "Marker" arrived in Donbass. Dmitry Rogozin, the former head of the Roskosmos corporation and the head of the Tsarskie Wolves group of military advisers in the Donbass, announced this on his Telegram channel.

According to the politician, the loading of images of targets and the development of combat algorithms as part of a group of combat robots are now beginning. It is also planned to install anti-tank weapons.



Earlier, Rogozin said that the Marker combat robots, designed to combat tanks enemy, capable of hitting American Abrams tanks and German Leopard tanks. According to Rogozin, combat robots have a special electronic catalog with target images.

Russian combat robots "Marker" can hit enemy tanks and even air targets, such as unmanned aerial vehicles. Now the robots will be tested in the special military operation zone. Previously, they were tested as a security system for the Vostochny cosmodrome.

As you know, the Marker robot is a project of the National Center for the Development of Technologies and Basic Elements of Robotics of the Advanced Research Foundation and the Android Technology NGO. In September 2022, experts noted that Markers could be used as carriers for 16 kamikaze quadrocopters.

Now the Russian military can experience the real capabilities of combat robots on the battlefield. Rogozin also noted that the delivered batch is the first, then, apparently, new deliveries are planned.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    91 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +10
      2 February 2023 13: 22
      This is the only way to test weapons, fighting, and not exercises and simulations at the training grounds, you will immediately see both strengths and weaknesses.
      1. +7
        2 February 2023 13: 44
        Maybe you can explain Rogozin's status as a citizen?
        I'm trying to understand everything - he acts there as a lone enthusiast or as a representative of our military-industrial complex or the Russian Ministry of Defense as a test of operational and performance characteristics on the battlefield.
        In practice, new models of weapons are transferred to the military, and those, with or without the participation of manufacturers, test them on the front end, and then issue conclusions on them.

        And Rogozin, who is he in fact - an operator, a manufacturer or a free "shooter"? recourse
        1. +4
          2 February 2023 13: 53
          It seems to me that now he is just a blogger. It’s his profession, why not write. And specialists should definitely test.
          1. +2
            2 February 2023 19: 40
            Quote from: dmi.pris1
            It seems to me that now he is just a blogger. It’s his profession, why not write. And experts should certainly test. And this must be done



            Ex-head of Roskosmos Rogozin announced the arrival of four Marker combat robots in Donbass

            This is FOR SURE he himself developed, tested, and now he will produce in huge quantities for his honestly earned finances at the VOSTOCHNY Kozmodrome and deliver personally to the front line of the NWO ...
            He is such a "talent" with the richest imagination of a journalist who manages to develop everything, build it, and show off on the screen in NATO uniform. And most importantly, this is a wound in one soft spot during a special secret operation carried out by him personally ...
            This is the heroism of a man with a capital letter
            1. +2
              2 February 2023 23: 53
              ... - Yes! He is a "talent" and a journalist, as you noticed! Such a "development" was made by the Royal "Unions" "under Khokhloma" to paint and ruined the "Zvezda" module, flunked the "Eagle" program aka "Federation", effectively "left" the SPECIALISTS WHO WORKED with "handles", and left the "biathlon" and DEfective managers . Well "sawed" "Vostochny" in addition.
              1. yho
                -1
                3 February 2023 09: 33
                This is a general trend. Previously, manufacturing enterprises were run by engineers, and now managers. Marketing...People want pretty colorful wrappers, they don't like edible paper.
              2. 0
                3 February 2023 23: 38
                But it’s true that Roskosmos sawed well, how many launches have already been made without accidents ..
            2. +2
              3 February 2023 16: 46
              What does Rogozin have to do with it?! The developer, or rather the whole team, is completely different people than a balabol with a fragment, it’s strange why there are no articles on VO from the team or about the team, this cosmic miracle Yudo is shoved all the time and everywhere
              1. +1
                3 February 2023 23: 46
                Have you ever heard of state secrets? Or you don’t know, because a decent war is going on in the western direction .. And we already know for sure that the Nazis and sabotage are not bad at doing (of course, cynically, but ask Dugin) in general, a strange curiosity about those who, without noise and dust in quiet laboratories and bureaus, forges the victory of the country, and someone, like three poplars on ivy, sticks out and averts envious eyes
        2. +7
          2 February 2023 14: 08
          Maybe you can explain Rogozin's status as a citizen?

          Billionaire / philanthropist / Fiction writer with a bias in schizoid prose. In general, an unrecognized genius wink
          1. +1
            2 February 2023 16: 22
            Maybe in the future he will become the grandfather of Skynet. laughing
            1. +1
              2 February 2023 23: 58
              ... - "... irons need to be strangled in the cradle so that they do not become" prots "T 1000" (I) hi
          2. +5
            3 February 2023 11: 08
            By the way, you are being ironic in vain, he will write. I listened to his interview after this story, well, it was from his words that there were 7 shells, two pieces fell at his feet and did not explode, that's literally what he said.
        3. -6
          3 February 2023 09: 34
          Volunteer. With extensive leadership experience and ability to lead. Leadership is a talent given by God.
          That is why he created a party in his time, from which he was torn off and called to the ministers. That is why he created his own group at the front and therefore knocked out these tanks for testing.

          He is the creator and engine of ideas. Unlike us ordinary workers working for the employer. The fact that many do not like him, and a controversial personality, so it has always been so. Not everyone likes Trump either. Just like Putin or Zelensky.
          ..
          Let him experience. It's a good thing.
        4. +5
          3 February 2023 09: 39
          Quote: credo
          And Rogozin, who is he in fact - an operator, a manufacturer or a free "shooter"?

          "slapped" - he is inherently
          as my grandmother said: "neither steal, do not guard ..."
        5. +4
          3 February 2023 11: 25
          Quote: credo
          And Rogozin, who is he in fact - an operator, a manufacturer or a free "shooter"?

          They talked about these:
          "It dangles like a certain object in an ice-hole..."
        6. +2
          4 February 2023 01: 35
          His status: "Royal Wolf"! What is not clear, then? laughing
          1. 0
            10 February 2023 00: 24
            ... - and HOW MUCH this "wolf has no idea what" TEETH?! The "rat wolf" tried to "gnaw" "fat rats" - yes, he broke his teeth, just like in "space" "they scared the little girl - and," he was blown away. " hit his fingers. "Now Dima2" put his tongue WHERE IT IS RIGHT - and NOT "gu-gu" with his "wound in soft tissues" - (Sorry for the profanity)
        7. -1
          4 February 2023 19: 28
          Rogozin is retired. He was removed from the status of head of Roscosmos and was not given a new position. He himself went to Donetsk, with a group of nerds, there were all sorts of ideas, then the prado foolishly framed other people. At the very shrapnel got stuck in the neck area (and not as they say that in the ass, but glad to believe).
          Now he has returned there, and is engaged in connecting the initiative groups and the military, helping to push through innovations with his own name. But he could be retired now, but he himself knows that he is being hunted, but in the area of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbthe places of hostilities.
          So kudos to the man!

          And you only see the media image of this person.
          I try to look at everything from the point of view of formal logic, where an idiot, a trampoline, a corrupt official (if this is not proven) does not mean anything I look at the facts.
          Rogozin is young.
          And it's a pity to see that many determine their opinion on the principle of the herd effect, and some are like jackals and generally savor the fables about his ass. That they themselves did nothing for the war except their angry comments that everything is bad, let's do it faster.
          And Rogozin is in the rear but not far from the front line, and some mock him. .. Shame.
      2. +2
        3 February 2023 08: 58
        Quote: Murmur 55
        Here's the only way to test weapons, fighting

        This device was developed as a means of ensuring security. Therefore, the ideal place for these robots is to monitor the border area. On the same left bank of the Dnieper, and the operators in protected dugouts. It is the same with the entire perimeter of the uk..gangdots adjacent to the territory.
        1. +1
          3 February 2023 12: 30
          Quote: skeptic
          This device was developed as a means of ensuring security. Therefore, the ideal place for these robots is to monitor the border area.
          The work must be used where it can help save the lives of our soldiers, and not where it will simply ride with a small chance of colliding with the enemy.
          The robot has interchangeable weapons, and there is an option where instead of anti-tank grenade launchers there is an automatic one, which is a good help in clearing the area (or city) against enemy infantry. If its optics also has a thermal channel, then in general a song.
          Machine gun + grenade launcher + good eyesight and the ability to perform combat missions without risk to their fighters - in general, there would be more such assistants.
          1. 0
            10 February 2023 00: 34
            ... - in the Russian Federation they began to produce cameras for 24 mp MATRIX ?!, or maybe email. engines DEVELOPED in Russia and sold for "penny", maybe batteries of "increased capacity and not afraid of -40", and also sold for "penny" - NAME AT LEAST 3 INVENTIONS not sold to "partners", since 2002? ???
        2. +1
          3 February 2023 13: 48
          This device was developed as a means of ensuring security. Therefore, the ideal place for these robots is to monitor the border area. On the same left bank of the Dnieper, and the operators in protected dugouts. It is the same with the entire perimeter of the uk..gangdots adjacent to the territory.

          And even in this role, he needs a 360-degree view. Otherwise, he is alive until the first RPG or machine-gun fire on external sensors. Minus those who wish, but I don’t believe in this expensive toy on the real battlefield. sad
    2. +5
      2 February 2023 13: 23
      Well, at least something useful. I hope there will be more, not 4 pieces.
      1. +2
        2 February 2023 14: 01
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        I hope there will be more, not 4 pieces.

        " Rogozin also noted that the delivered batch is the first, then new deliveries are planned. "
        Will be delivered, judging by the tests, in a modified form. Somewhere, something may not have been taken into account, tests in combat conditions will immediately show.
        I will express my point of view. Recently, a video slipped through as reconnaissance using a quadrocopter, at night, spotted a sneaking DRG and artillery destroyed it. So that's why I wrote this. The time of using the UAV, at least during the day, at least at night, depends on the battery power. While you recharge or replace the copter, it will take some time. During this time, the enemy's DRG can leak.
        It seems to me that in this case the reconnaissance drone "Marker" with an UAV will help a lot. The time of use is not limited, it sees the same during the day and at night. Install them at night in especially dangerous areas and one outfit can cover a large area.
        1. +4
          3 February 2023 00: 01
          ... - have you seen a lot of UAV saturation from the Moscow Region in PRIVATE units of at least a battalion order?!!!
    3. 0
      2 February 2023 13: 28
      Agree with previous speakers
      But only...
      "Marker" ... Why?
      "Reaper"!
      1. -2
        2 February 2023 13: 31
        Come on.
        Whatever the child is amused with ...
        What else remains besides PR after they have turned from their homes?
        1. -6
          2 February 2023 13: 51
          From there since 2018. Not too overused. I don’t really understand the aggression towards Rogozin here
          1. +4
            2 February 2023 14: 08
            What is to be understood here?
            You just need to know what this gentleman was doing until 2018. Yes, and after.
            What does it have to do with the number of accident-free launches for which Korolev, Glushko and Chelomey should be thanked?
            What does it have to do with the construction of production facilities in the rocket and space industry?
            What did this person do besides PR?
            And what did he leave behind? Completely destroyed international relations in the field of space topics?
            The only thing that can be hardly credited to this man is that he gave impetus to the development of astronautics in the United States. Musk should thank him for the silly trampoline chatter.
            1. +3
              2 February 2023 15: 30
              Quote from: skeptick2
              What does it have to do with the number of accident-free launches for which Korolev, Glushko and Chelomey should be thanked?


              Do you also attribute a series of accidents to Glushko and Chalomeya? Or the Queen?
              1. 0
                2 February 2023 15: 53
                Alas, partly on them too.
                If you are familiar with the term VBR, then you should understand that 100% failure-free does not exist. For Soyuz, this value is fantastic, but even it does not guarantee 100 successful launches per 100 launches.
                1. yho
                  -8
                  3 February 2023 09: 25
                  What a name… Union… Ha! "Scoop", galoshes would be called!
          2. +7
            2 February 2023 14: 20
            Quote: IvanIvanov
            From there since 2018.

            Yes, it was there that he was exiled from the post of head of the defense industry, which he had been since 2011. By the way, Roskosmos was already subordinate to him, since 2011.
            Quote: IvanIvanov
            I don’t really understand the aggression towards Rogozin here
            What is there not to understand? All of his "unparalleled in the world", created under his strict guidance, suddenly evaporated somewhere at once, after which, last year, only old men from storage warehouses went into battle. I'm still waiting for the case to be opened for 50 billion, which were allocated in 2017 for the serial production of the grandfather of IL-114. There, even the Uzbek backlog still cannot be collected. And the money is gone. Last month, another 550 million were allocated.
            Do you have feelings of aggression towards him? Or maybe you got something from this "royal" table?
      2. +3
        2 February 2023 14: 11
        Quote: I dare_notice_
        Agree with previous speakers
        But only...
        "Marker" ... Why?
        "Reaper"!

        And I liked "The Freeloader", boldly, in Russian laughing
        Implies skimming cream. lol
        It's a pity I didn't go to the series.
        1. +3
          2 February 2023 14: 47
          Quote: Nevsky_ZU
          And I liked "The Freeloader"
          Then it's better right away - "Sawmill".
    4. +3
      2 February 2023 13: 32
      It will be interesting to read a report on their use in real combat.
      1. +5
        2 February 2023 14: 18
        Don't be naive. Who will let them into a real battle? In the same place, survivability is below the plinth.
        They will ride a little in the second, and even the third echelon, so that nothing happens. Then the creators will scribble bravura reports on the topic "analogous" and continue to cut the military budget.
    5. The comment was deleted.
      1. -3
        2 February 2023 13: 43
        I am afraid that such diagnoses as that of the most important royal wolf are inoperable. Only palliative methods, since we do not practice euthanasia.
      2. -2
        2 February 2023 13: 52
        Explain what Rogozin did critically wrong.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +2
            2 February 2023 15: 22
            They don't know the history of this man.

            So tell about his heroic path and great deeds.
        2. +6
          2 February 2023 18: 50
          Quote: IvanIvanov
          Explain what Rogozin did critically wrong.

          In this particular case, people are outraged by the frank PR of this figure.
          Designers and manufacturers made the product. The product, you must understand, went to the fleet for a run-in. Which will be made by military people and who will then work with this product.
          What side is Rogozin here? What does he have to do with all this?
          Why does the cart have a fifth wheel?
          1. +2
            2 February 2023 19: 47
            Quote from: skeptick2
            then work with the product.
            What side is Rogozin here? What does he have to do with all this?


            Decided to decorate. PR
            1. 0
              3 February 2023 12: 39
              Quote from: skeptick2
              The product, you must understand, went to the fleet for a run-in. Which will be made by military people and who will then work with this product.
              What side is Rogozin here?
              Rogozin here is just the most direct "side" - it was his organization that made it possible for enterprises to test their equipment in combat conditions, and demonstrate these same products that the military did not even suspect existed (if it was developed on an initiative basis).
              1. 0
                10 February 2023 00: 40
                ... - You are either a cynic or a "troll of Dima2".
          2. +4
            2 February 2023 20: 18
            In the simplicity of my soul, for some reason I thought that we had been dealing with this topic for a long time. And how many stuffing was there about the development of robots for the cutting edge!? Or was Chubais lying? Or some other bullshit? And how much did they crackle about super-equipment for soldiers? All sorts of exoskeletons...
            And then it turned out - "four experimental samples" ... PSHIK ... We issue "steel helmet model 1943" to the mobilized.
            1. Qas
              -3
              3 February 2023 12: 34
              I'm sorry, but do you understand elementary things in economics? Millions of them are stored in warehouses. For what purpose do you think? Probably for issuance to a participant in hostilities. So what don't you like?
            2. 0
              10 February 2023 00: 45
              ... - "biathlon" to "help" you - tama mustache KHARASHO.
              ... and the "Marker" of the Moscow Region was "run in" in 2018 by the "unworthy TG-channels" of the witnesses - "they themselves shot", and then the "tales" of "Marika" were told - (so that their children would "such happiness" be up to 7 KNEES). - And, the venal bastard is still trying to "puff up" on someone.
      3. +4
        2 February 2023 18: 42
        Quote: DvaParovoza
        I would send Rogozin to Lukashenko in some kind of collective farm as a chairman. Maybe there this moron would be taught economic activity ...


        Have pity on the collective farm and collective farmers
        It will break it down!
      4. +3
        2 February 2023 19: 42
        Old Man will not allow this "literate" close
      5. 0
        3 February 2023 00: 05
        ... - to "illuminate" cows and fields and paint "under Khokhloma" - take pity on at least cows and potatoes ...
    6. +3
      2 February 2023 13: 51
      All the same, is it Marker or Fedor?
      Or "Fyodor Marker"?

      https://lenta.ru/news/2023/01/29/marker_marker/
      earlier, "Marker" was also tested as a security system for the Vostochny cosmodrome


    7. +7
      2 February 2023 13: 52
      Chatterbox Rogozin, a godsend for a spy.
      Silently, you need to try it first.
      Fucking self-promoter.
      1. -9
        2 February 2023 14: 12
        what did he do wrong? Tell. If not, then you are an asshole.
    8. +3
      2 February 2023 13: 56
      Without a person, it's all bullshit. A wooden shield will be put on Abrams, it will change the visible configuration of the tank and everything will be a robot and will not understand that it is a tank. I hope the developers have provided this option?
      1. yho
        -1
        3 February 2023 09: 21
        I think that the robot can also be controlled remotely by the operator.
    9. -4
      2 February 2023 14: 13
      Four fighting robots...
      And how can they affect the course of hostilities?
      And the price of such a device is also very interesting, and not in rubles, but in such "parrots" as portable anti-tank systems and other types of weapons.
      And it reminds me of something ... well, yes, in the Reich they also loved to create all sorts of wunderwaffes, instead of saturating the troops with proven weapons. For example, no matter how the German generals did not ask to increase the production of "fours", they still slipped the "tigers" into them. Raw cars, which ate unmeasured gasoline, and even waiting for them without dancing with a tambourine cannot be transferred.
      But the military-industrial complex earned more marks.
      1. 0
        2 February 2023 20: 12
        Just one message, and so many stupid things at once! Firstly, these robots were brought not in order to break through the front and drive all the way to Kuev, but to test an experimental product in a combat situation, which is not clear what is wrong with this. Secondly, about the tigers, a total of 1300 produced vehicles burned tens of thousands of spacecraft tanks and allies, could the four with its characteristics be so? Unlikely. Quite a medium tank on a par with the t-34-76,85. Until the age of 44, the tiger was the real king of the battlefield, until the IS-2 and other "St. John's wort" came to it, and fully justified the money invested in it. And by the way, for the money: various modifications of the Pz.Kpfw. IV had a price of 103-115 thousand RM,
        Pz.Kpfw. V (Panther) - 130 thousand RM,
        Pz.Kpfw. VI Ausf. E (Tiger) - 260 thousand RM and
        Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf. B (Tiger II) - 321 thousand RM. That is, with the funds allocated for the release of the Tiger, it was possible to build 2.5 fours and 3.5 T-34s, but the tigers burned 34 - ok much more than 3.5 times.
        1. -4
          3 February 2023 16: 07
          This is for sure, a lot of nonsense, you really have it. Have you read the tales of tens of thousands in liberal manuals? Or Baryatinsky with his "dueling situations"?
          Only reality, it is very different. "Tiger" shone only from ambushes as anti-tank missiles. So there, conventional anti-tank guns do a good job. On the battlefield, well, only when the terrain is open, the soil is suitable, and best of all, asphalt and there is no enemy aircraft. That's when something could be shown.
          And they are not tanks in order to fight with their own kind, they have a different task.
          1. 0
            4 February 2023 21: 46
            I read the memoirs of real tankers who fought against tigers and were very respectful of this car, unlike the current couch cheers of patriots. As for the message about the unfortunate German generals who suffered from the lack of fours, I want to remind you that the four was already the most massive tank of the Reich, which were produced to the very end. At the expense of tasks, just the main task of the tiger was precisely the destruction of tanks, and, unfortunately, he coped with it with a bang. Further, if instead of a thousand with a penny of tigers, 3000-4000 fours would have been released (that was how much it was for the money), I think the war would have ended six months earlier, because. the fours couldn't give the 34-kam such a rebuff as the tiger did.
            1. 0
              6 February 2023 11: 04
              1. Before throwing such statements as a sofa jingoistic patriot, think about whether you yourself can prove that you are not such?
              2. To say that the "tiger" was created primarily as an anti-tank weapon is already beyond reason. lol
              1. -1
                6 February 2023 12: 14
                To say that the "tiger" was created primarily as an anti-tank weapon is already beyond reason.

                No, the Tiger was created as the basis of heavy tank battalions, in which it was assigned the role of protecting the "troikas" that were breaking through the defenses from the "thirty-fours" and anti-tank missiles. Merkblatten will dispel all doubts, if any.
                1. 0
                  7 February 2023 14: 11
                  In general, the heavy "tank" tiger was created to break through the defense. And the role of "protection" is assigned to anti-tank self-propelled guns.
                  However, you have already "flashed" knowledge. lol
                  1. +1
                    7 February 2023 15: 19
                    In general, the heavy "tank" tiger was created to break through the defense.

                    And you will obviously refer to Wikipedia wassat Not realizing that there is nothing in common between the idea of ​​Durchbruchwagen and the final implementation.
                    To prevent further nonsense, I will not even quote military historians, researchers and scans of publications from their works, but will immediately give the opportunity to study the source - a manual for military personnel of heavy battalions of Tiger tanks (which I mentioned above):

                    I think you will be interested in paragraph 34 of the "Tank vs. Tank" section. Where it is directly stated that the primary task is to fight enemy tanks, and this task must be given priority over others.
                    And, when you look at the world with new eyes, you may be wondering why, from the moment the heavy tank battalions were formed, the "troikas" (modification N) working in conjunction with the Tigers began to put 75mm "cigarette butts" of low ballistics (attached trajectory) and how this fits into the concept of using heavy battalions, which I described above.
                    PS Still, I can’t help but refer to the book by Roger Ford tongue

                    "primary focus of killing tanks" can you translate?
                    P.P.S
                    And they are not tanks in order to fight with their own kind, they have a different task.

                    That is why, since the second half of the 20th century, in the ammo rack of tanks, most shots to destroy armor wassat (in WWII they adhered to equal shares in the vast majority).
                    1. 0
                      8 February 2023 23: 16
                      To prevent further nonsense, I will not even quote military historians, researchers and scans of publications from their works, but will immediately give the opportunity to study the source - a manual for military personnel of heavy battalions of Tiger tanks (which I mentioned above):


                      You keep talking nonsense. For your information, it is not historians who determine the purpose of tanks. Yes
                      Kindly provide the terms of reference for the creation of the "Tiger" tank.
                      1. 0
                        9 February 2023 09: 25
                        You keep talking nonsense. For your information, it is not historians who determine the purpose of tanks.

                        They don't define it, but they do. including research (you somehow modestly missed the word researchers). Refute at least one "nonsense". You can not? Free.
                        Kindly provide the terms of reference for the creation of the "Tiger" tank.

                        You are funny. I showed you instructions on the use of Tiger tanks. It's enough. Your requirements are an attempt to load the interlocutor with the fulfillment of Wishlist in order to drag out time.
                        PS
                        Guderian in his 1937 work "Achtung-Panzer!", which determines the tactics of the Panzerwaffe in a future war:
                        The most dangerous enemy of a tank is another tank.

                        Post-war study of the experience of WWII by Americans

                        look at page 115, find the words of Kesselring and Simon (explain who it is?):
                        Heavy tanks form the core of the vanguard and their main target is enemy tanks and anti-tank guns, which can be destroyed early on by using the long range and heavy caliber gun of the heavy tanks.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
              2. -1
                10 February 2023 01: 02
                ... - Don't worry, right now the "Rogozin wolves" will catch up with "good fellows-dared men-with a beating-RUSSIAN-shirt, to a RUSSIAN MAN who has ONLY "sedentary residence" - and SACRIFICES RUSSIAN "without looking", like the "nightingale and comrades "So it is with the" speedy girl ".
    10. +3
      2 February 2023 14: 25
      Quote: credo
      Maybe you can explain Rogozin's status as a citizen?
      I'm trying to understand everything - he acts there as a lone enthusiast or as a representative of our military-industrial complex or the Russian Ministry of Defense as a test of operational and performance characteristics on the battlefield.
      In practice, new models of weapons are transferred to the military, and those, with or without the participation of manufacturers, test them on the front end, and then issue conclusions on them.

      And Rogozin, who is he in fact - an operator, a manufacturer or a free "shooter"? recourse

      He flies like a dragonfly, from the hotel to the landfill. And even when he was suddenly wounded, he turned out to be a friend of all robots. Or maybe it’s enough to fly around the world ... But just live in the Donbass, fight there ... Such is the opinion ...
    11. -1
      2 February 2023 14: 38
      another wundewaffe) Although, if Rogozin himself signed up, it will be a thing.
    12. +4
      2 February 2023 14: 49
      Thermal imagers, copters in some divisions are completely absent! And they play cars.
      1. +1
        4 February 2023 13: 07
        PR on the blood, there is no other way to call the activities of Dmitry Olegovich.
    13. +1
      2 February 2023 15: 03
      Well then. Good luck in mastering and developing new tactics, as part of robots. Good luck to the operators and engineers. This needs to be studied and developed. The main thing is not to abandon and gain experience. drinks
    14. The comment was deleted.
    15. +7
      2 February 2023 16: 48
      Large review article: https://rg.ru/2023/01/26/leopardy-unichtozhit-robot-robot-marker-projdet-boevuiu-obkatku-v-zone-svo.html

      Marker is said to be armed with an RPG-26. Its armor penetration is 440mm. And this is not enough to knock out a modern MBT in the forehead. On board and stern - understandable.
      1. yho
        -6
        3 February 2023 09: 17
        Two will distract attention, and the third, at this time, will come in from behind.
        1. 0
          10 February 2023 01: 22
          ... - "girl" - with your "experiences in battle tactics" go to the nearest alley and do not "let yellow blood".
    16. The comment was deleted.
    17. +2
      2 February 2023 21: 22
      Dmitry cannot be allowed in, nowhere from the word at all. If you follow his activities, you can see that PR and poor-quality work are everywhere. Journalist in one word.
      1. +3
        3 February 2023 00: 11
        ... otherwise he will give up some territories, like his namesake - (... someone D. gave Norway 175 km000 of the Barents Sea.
        Together with the territory, patriot D. gave the Norwegians, as a pleasant bonus, about 300 million cubic meters of hydrocarbon deposits located in this part of the Barents Sea) (if you count in oil equivalent, this is 1,9 billion barrels). (In 2017, there was a scandal in the Novosibirsk region. It suddenly became clear that the Russian-Kazakhstan border runs along Lake Sladkoe, where Russians always hunted and rested. Information about the transfer was officially published on the website of the region where this lake was included, a storm rose, but so as the times were already new, no one recognized the fact of the transfer. They said that the territory was always behind the Kazakhs in the ratio of 70/30, it was just that the lake became shallow, part of the coast was exposed and this one became visible. In general, do not believe your eyes. And who believes that foreign agent.)
        (https://dzen.ru/a/Y7_D7T9x7RIEskX_)
        1. +2
          3 February 2023 00: 32
          ... and for a snack: - "... - Russian soldiers on the front line are incomprehensible to the transfer of captured militants of the neo-Nazi Azov regiment to Ukraine and behind-the-scenes agreements that occur when fierce battles are going on at the fronts." - said the Russian military commissar Dmitry Steshin (https://dzen.ru/a/Y9pF9GE_nEYVQv-v) - ... and WHERE HE is "wrong"!!!!!! (... for admirers of "nightingale" and bots "everything IS").
        2. +2
          3 February 2023 08: 14
          Quote from Sergio CDS
          It suddenly turned out that the Russian-Kazakhstan border runs along Lake Sladkoe, where the Russians have always hunted and rested. Information about the transfer was officially published on the website of the area where this lake was included, a storm arose, but since the times were already new, no one recognized the fact of the transfer. They said that the territory was always for the Kazakhs in the ratio of 70/30, just the lake became shallow, part of the coast was exposed and this one became visible.

          To begin with, read the description of where the border passed, and you will learn a lot of new things. The fact that, for example, Kazakhstan gave us sections of the territory during the delimitation
      2. 0
        10 February 2023 01: 24
        ... - maybe it's easier as with "irons" ?!
    18. +3
      3 February 2023 01: 25
      "It is also planned to install anti-tank weapons." yeah, like with tape and blue tape stick anti-tank RPG-7 to the robots
    19. +2
      3 February 2023 01: 35
      Then a well-known marker, Monya, approached him ...
    20. yho
      -2
      3 February 2023 09: 12
      And what about the Uran-6 sapper robot, I heard that it was blown up by a mine?
    21. +1
      3 February 2023 11: 13
      Does Rogozin have such a position - the former head of Roskosmos? Gentlemen journalists, let's somehow more correctly name the people whose statements you refer to and do not invent non-existent positions.
    22. +2
      3 February 2023 13: 54
      "Marker".....
      Ahh, draw red lines.
    23. +2
      3 February 2023 16: 39
      Quote: Nevsky_ZU
      And I liked "The Freeloader"


      +100500
      also add a surname, though with a small letter
    24. +1
      4 February 2023 06: 36
      Something I doubt the royal wolf and his robot. Let's see in action.
      1. 0
        10 February 2023 01: 27
        ... "wolf-ant" is related to the "Marker" as you are to pear-making on the ISLAND OF FREEDOM.
    25. +2
      4 February 2023 10: 42
      plug this fountain, let people rest... it's a miracle no matter what it takes - the end is predictable.
    26. +2
      4 February 2023 11: 14
      For everything that this starball undertook, nothing good came of it, one PR, it seems like another method of laundering the dough
    27. +1
      4 February 2023 13: 04
      The situation is a little comical, at first Rogozin pays penny salaries to engineers, but at the same time he pays those close to him huge salaries even by world standards. When everything comes to a logically sad end and there is an opportunity to still receive dividends, he rushes ahead of everyone, pushing the engineers aside, interfering with work (and this person cannot not interfere). To whom the war, as the saying goes, and to whom the mother is dear. (And yes, under Rogozin it was installed anti-record by the number of launches, for the 20th year there were 17, Russia has never launched so little). Many here call Rogozin a journalist, but this is a huge mistake. What kind of journalist is he? All his activities are self-exaltation, praise, enrichment. There can be no question of any journalistic work. In biology, such organisms are called "parasites".

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"