Head of EU diplomacy: Supply of combat aircraft to Ukraine is not on the agenda

19
Head of EU diplomacy: Supply of combat aircraft to Ukraine is not on the agenda

Currently, the European Union is not considering the possibility of transferring Western-made combat aircraft to Ukraine. This was stated by the head of EU diplomacy, Josep Borrell, commenting on the topic discussed today about the possibility of supplying Western-made fighter jets.

As Borrell noted, the supply of combat aircraft to Ukraine is not on the agenda. This issue led to disagreements among European countries, the politician stressed.



Obviously, the chief of European diplomacy has in mind that the supply of aircraft is not discussed by the European Union in terms of the short term. But is it worth trusting the European Commissioner for Foreign Relations?

After all, for a long time the countries of Western Europe denied the possibility of supplies tanks Ukraine, but in the end, the “hawks” from the United States and Great Britain, with the assistance of Poland, managed to crush German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and he decided to transfer German-made Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine. Where are the guarantees that the same scenario will not be implemented in relation to combat aircraft?

Recall that earlier, former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson called on the United States to transfer combat aircraft and long-range missiles to Ukraine, as this would allegedly help the Kyiv regime win the conflict with Russia.

It is also known that the issue of the possibility of supplying F-16 aircraft was discussed in the Netherlands at the parliamentary level. But since these American-made fighters, it is impossible to transfer them to Ukraine without the appropriate permission of the United States.
  • Wikipedia / Näytä tekijätiedot
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    2 February 2023 10: 22
    The supply of combat aircraft to Ukraine is not worth it ..

    it means it lies .. on the table under the cloth .. or in the sleeve, like a trump ace from a card sharper
    1. +1
      2 February 2023 10: 50
      Everything is rightly said:
      At present, the European Union is not considering the possibility of transferring Western-made combat aircraft to Ukraine.
      ,
      because this issue is now being considered by the Americans, the real masters of the EU.
  2. +2
    2 February 2023 10: 23
    Head of EU diplomacy: Supply of combat aircraft to Ukraine is not on the agenda
    here it is necessary to put the accent marks correctly .. it’s not worth it, or it’s not worth it.
  3. +1
    2 February 2023 10: 23
    Don't listen to him!
    He is... Josep.
    And that's it.
  4. +3
    2 February 2023 10: 31
    and what difference does it make to us, in any case, if we want to win, we will have to fight .. for most readers of the site, it’s clear that there will be deliveries of both aviation and missiles .. just right now the soil is being prepared for this .. with fighter aircraft, it’s still not so simple as our enemies would like. hiding a tank is much easier than hiding a fighter. you also need to understand that in the first stages, rather old modifications of fighters will go to Ukraine. so we shouldn't have any problems with them.
  5. +3
    2 February 2023 10: 31
    Today it’s not worth it, tomorrow it will get up, all this has already passed. Believe "partners" do not respect yourself!
  6. 0
    2 February 2023 10: 33
    Head of EU diplomacy: Supply of combat aircraft to Ukraine is not on the agenda

    Josep Borrell wanted to add that there is no question of aviation yet. For this, a certain time or certain events must pass. Well, what is needed for this?
    I think something will happen in Kyiv now, an unknown plane will drop a bomb on a kindergarten (this is an example)
    1. +1
      2 February 2023 10: 38
      why, everything is much simpler .. an unknown event is the success of our troops and advancement in depth ..
      1. 0
        2 February 2023 10: 41
        Quote from incoggnoto
        why, everything is much simpler .. an unknown event is the success of our troops and advancement in depth ..

        The advance of our troops does not create a wave in the media, an event is needed. Just remember Bucha
        1. +1
          2 February 2023 10: 48
          and we do not take the media. taking into account the fact that decisions are not made in Kyiv but in the west. so if
          analytical cents see that ukraine is starting to sag, there is a new supply and new weapons.. you can say whatever you like, but in the west they take analytics seriously.. so we don’t need to relax
          1. 0
            2 February 2023 12: 12
            Quote from incoggnoto
            and we do not take the media. taking into account the fact that decisions are not made in Kyiv but in the west. so if

            Decisions in the West are usually made not by analysts, but by politicians under pressure from the media. It was the wave in the media after the crash of MH-17 that led to the first economic and political sanctions against Russia. Sanctions have long been wanted to be introduced, but a weighty reason is needed, and they create it with their own hands.
  7. -1
    2 February 2023 10: 34
    It's not for this old holey sneaker to decide what and when to deliver to the outskirts. There are guys who are tighter, your business is servile - to pay ...... That's all Gayrop diplomacy.
  8. +1
    2 February 2023 10: 36
    the supply of combat aircraft to Ukraine is not on the agenda
    Today, perhaps it is not worth it, although Kyiv continues to knock on the thresholds and no longer with requests, but with demands. And who will guarantee that this issue will not be considered tomorrow? Maybe Borrell, I'll shaft in his drawbar?
    1. 0
      2 February 2023 11: 36
      Head of EU diplomacy: Supply of combat aircraft to Ukraine is not on the agenda

      Quote: rotmistr60
      And who can guarantee that this issue will not be considered tomorrow?

      As recently as two days ago:
      Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke
      Your post can be used to explain what are Overton windows.
      Each of the stages is an approximation to the last.

      This is exactly how everything happens ... And you and I perfectly understand why this happens ...
      Well, Caliber, Daggers, Zircons will not fly tomorrow to that filthy meeting of "Kyiv friends" - Euro-Nazis. It's so convenient and safe to yell at the whole world about the desire to destroy Russia and all Russians without getting "a cap" ...
      Imagine for a moment what if (hypothetically) you finally got it?!
  9. +2
    2 February 2023 10: 37
    It may not be on the agenda yet, but the fact that they are preparing Khokhlatsky pilots is a fact.
  10. 0
    2 February 2023 10: 42
    No one believes the sly statements of Western politicians anymore, the "fried rooster" will bite in one place and the issue of supplying aircraft will come to the fore.
    1. -1
      2 February 2023 11: 13
      In this particular case, they are not lying.
      On the agenda the question of aircraft is not worth it. They determined a set of weapons for the spring campaign in Ramstein, plus the Americans are throwing in extra. packages and eurojackals try to keep up.
      But now you need to make sure that no one shirks and jumps off and the delivery takes place in the required volume. And this question is on the agenda.
      Expansion of the range of supplies is a matter of the next agenda. They said as honestly as possible - not today.
  11. -1
    2 February 2023 10: 47
    P .. dit like Trotsky, they will only deliver it not this year.
  12. +1
    2 February 2023 10: 57
    I am 100% sure that Ukrainian pilots are already being trained in Europe or the States. Or sets of pilots - mercenaries / vacationers.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"