The Russian delegation to the UN warned of the risk of a direct conflict of nuclear powers

38
The Russian delegation to the UN warned of the risk of a direct conflict of nuclear powers

The transfer of weapons and military equipment by Western countries to the Kyiv regime entails a significant increase in the risk of a clash of nuclear powers. This was warned by the Russian delegation at the plenary session of the UN Conference on Disarmament.

Supplied by the West weapon used for shelling the civilian population of Donbass. In addition, the West trains mercenaries of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and supplies intelligence information. Considering that the USA, Great Britain and France are nuclear powers, there is a risk of their direct clash with Russia. Now for deliveries tanks The West is already discussing the transfer of aircraft and long-range missiles.



According to the Russian delegation, people die every day in the Donbass, and the reason for their death is the transfer of Western weapons to Ukrainian formations.

At the same time, official representatives of Western countries declare the need to resolve the conflict in Ukraine by political means, but the deeds of Western countries diverge from the words of their political leaders.

The supply of weapons to Ukraine leads to negative consequences in the form of prolonging the conflict. In any case, Ukraine cannot win the conflict, so the supply of weapons is just a way to make it more bloody. Another question is that the Western countries have already “thrown off their masks”, so the statements of Russian diplomats are unlikely to have any influence on the policy of Western states. The opinion of the rest of the UN members, who do not belong to the Western world, is also indifferent for the US and its European satellites.
  • U.S. Department of Defense
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    1 February 2023 19: 55
    And the fact that Belgorod and Kursk are being shelled is unimportant information, unworthy of discussion in the halls of the UN?
    1. +12
      1 February 2023 20: 00
      Until there is an answer for the words, they will just laugh.
    2. -4
      1 February 2023 22: 54
      Quote: forty-eighth
      And the fact that Belgorod and Kursk are being shelled is unimportant information, unworthy of discussion in the halls of the UN?

      These are adjacent territories, and should fly there. It would be strange if nothing had flown there in 11 months of hostilities!
    3. 0
      3 February 2023 18: 39
      What we are talking about is not at all clear! what
      At the same time, official representatives of Western countries declare the need to resolve the conflict in Ukraine by political means, but the deeds of Western countries diverge from the words of their political leaders.

      Who was talking about a political settlement anyway? I only heard: "Russia must lose! And must be defeated on the battlefield! Therefore, we will support it as much as necessary!" belay And Burbock blurted out that Europe is at war with Russia in Ukraine and therefore Germany should send tanks! belay
      It's time to either do something, and then chat! Or not to talk at all, but only to do! am
  2. +4
    1 February 2023 20: 00
    This needs to be concretely demonstrated, otherwise they will not understand, statements about "risks" have been heard since February 24. How many red lines have been torn since then

    According to the Russian delegation, people die every day in the Donbass, and the reason for their death is the transfer of Western weapons to Ukrainian formations.
    Well, that's who they, edren root, explain this to. U.py.r.pits and cannibals?
  3. +11
    1 February 2023 20: 03
    We drove ourselves into zugzwang by shifting the red lines, now no one is afraid and respects, and our own population has not believed this chatter for a long time ...
    1. +2
      1 February 2023 20: 08
      I just remind you that it was not Korea, not Vietnam, not Afghanistan, not other Africa that caused a direct clash of nuclear powers
      1. Aag
        +4
        1 February 2023 20: 21
        Quote from Krivobokoff
        I just remind you that it was not Korea, not Vietnam, not Afghanistan, not other Africa that caused a direct clash of nuclear powers

        And there someone tried to threaten a nuclear power?
      2. 0
        3 February 2023 18: 33
        Why is Afghanistan on the list of wars of conquest? Did the USSR fight Afghanistan?
    2. -4
      1 February 2023 20: 47
      It’s just that the old “eggs” were already rotten in tin packaging, it was necessary to fuck on February 24.02.23, XNUMX, both in full, and in decision-making centers, and along the border in the west, a no-fly zone, a day of missile strikes to everyone and tactical nuclear weapons, then the owners would they put the fascists in their pants and asked permission to turn to the supreme GDP, and there were no deliveries and shouts, believe me, here it’s like in a fight in the alley, and not on a wrestling contractual tatami ...
      1. +1
        1 February 2023 20: 55
        You with the date of that, that .. Ah! Maybe you have a time machine and know something? Sorry for the sarcasm, it’s clear that they just made a mistake
    3. -1
      1 February 2023 21: 03
      If the political leadership of the country (and we all know that in fact this is one person on whom something really depends) does not show willpower, then no one will listen.

      In my opinion, if the mobilization had begun in March and the infrastructure would have been hit systematically from the very beginning (including railway bridges and railway junctions near the western border of Ukraine), then everything would have been decided by now.

      As well as the issue of supplies, if the GDP had given the go-ahead to use nuclear weapons at the NATO weapons depot in the Lvov region in the first month of the operation. Everyone would understand that the jokes were over and simply "condemned", and did not supply everything that our opponents like.
      1. 0
        2 February 2023 01: 30
        Now it is already clear that there was a plan and for a dozen days everything went according to plan and they should have sort of agreed, but Kyiv once again threw Russia. The troops had to be relocated and again a bummer near Kharkov, they had to announce mobilization with a delay of 4 months. So we live with incomprehensible prospects, and the enemy demands the 1991 border with reparations.
        1. +1
          2 February 2023 09: 45
          but Kyiv once again threw Russia

          The question is whether it is possible to defeat the enemy with such a stupid and incompetent government?
  4. -3
    1 February 2023 20: 12
    Conversations are empty.
    I remember back in the fall I picked up minuses for the idea of ​​​​using nuclear weapons in Europe.
    Well, now they came to this only from the rostrum of the UN
    1. -2
      1 February 2023 20: 51
      This is not a platform, but a porch, the platform is on top of the mausoleum of V. I. LENIN ...
    2. +3
      1 February 2023 21: 05
      Quote: Architect
      I remember back in the fall I picked up minuses for the idea of ​​​​using nuclear weapons in Europe.
      Well, now they came to this only from the rostrum of the UN

      Well, in the autumn you suggested "to fry it already", but so far from the UN rostrum they are only talking about "the risk of a conflict" between the nuclear powers. There is a big difference between "frying" and "marking the risk", as between Volochkova on the twine and Novodvorskaya on the pole.
      I look at you and today they hung a three-point minus.
      And all because "vigorous loaf" is an extreme measure and the fact that you and your family, like millions of other people, will live at least 1 more year without nuclear mushrooms, this is not bad.
      And if it comes to the use of nuclear weapons, then first of all it is necessary to ship to the USA and Britain, since this whole mess was initiated by them.
    3. +4
      1 February 2023 21: 12
      Nuclear weapons in Europe are the US dream of a fight between Russia and Europe. Therefore, it doesn’t roll. Only mattress covers should be threatened with such a toy! Lean a "zircon" fist against an impudent mattress muzzle and put up an alternative - either they retreat, or a fight, and then the United States goes to zero, and China becomes the world leader. And then the remaining "golden billion" will have to learn to squint their eyes in the east, cram hieroglyphs and lisp in Chinese! It is unlikely that the Americans will like such a prospect - they were already going to fight China in 25! But Putin will not deliver an ultimatum - he is a KGB officer, but they were taught to wait, pull the rubber and wait until everything resolves itself - remember the Minsk agreements! Another option is possible - to announce a military alliance with China by slipping Xi an American memorandum on the outbreak of war between the United States and China in 25. The fact that the United States wants to devour them is unlikely to please the Chinese and they can agree to such a military alliance!
    4. -2
      2 February 2023 01: 37
      I have also been talking about nuclear weapons since May, and also some minuses. Today I listened to the Russian Ambassador to the USA on TV. He said that the entire elite in the United States is firmly in the position of defeating Russia, throwing it on the borders of 1991 and forcing it to pay reparations. So we are approaching a nuclear strike, but I think not in Europe but in Ukraine. It would be desirable to inflict a demonstrative stratospheric nuclear strike on Kyiv, which would not lead to human casualties, but would burn part of the electronics.
      1. 0
        2 February 2023 09: 49
        You are waiting for the nuclear war to start, but have you prepared yourself a bunker?
  5. +3
    1 February 2023 20: 17
    "... the masks have been dropped, ... the statement cannot influence the policy of the Western powers"
    The statement can't, that's for sure.
    But if, upon further transfer of weapons to dill, which will undoubtedly hit Russian targets, not a statement is made, but a warning that arming Banderlogs with powerful weapons systems poses a global danger to Russia and, for example, the transport infrastructure of dill will be destroyed by a tactical nuclear weapons. If it does not reach, to begin with, destroy a section of the railway line on a stretch in a desert area. What will the "dropped masks" do?
    Will they go to Russia in the "last and decisive battle"? Will they risk Paris and London? Together with Washington, etc.?
    It's unlikely.. Their creed is to use others.
    Such an option is, of course, "not our method", but other Banderlogs and Banderlogs themselves must clearly know what they will come to.
  6. -5
    1 February 2023 20: 17
    If the scenario worsens for us, it becomes necessary to use tactical nuclear weapons in Belgium or Holland. There will be a lot of minuses from this, but only this can sober up the sponsors of the junkie and in the sobering and ringing silence their answer can confuse them. After all, the Russians attacked not a nuclear power, but also not the Eastern buffer Slavs, on the other hand, the Belgians and the Dutch are still not Americans, French and Saxons ...
    1. -2
      2 February 2023 01: 43
      The downsides of this will be darkness


      Okay, so what are the downsides?
      Only those who manage to run to the bomb shelter will have disadvantages.
      I won’t run, I want to immediately go to heaven and quickly, but those who run will die slowly and painfully.
      But thank God, for example, we have few bomb shelters left in Moscow.

      After all, the Russians attacked not a nuclear power


      :-)))
      Do you seriously think that when someone receives a signal about a missile attack, they will figure out exactly where the missiles are flying? The answer will be launched immediately at the very first detection - for this there is an early warning system.

      And do you seriously think that at least someone in the USA will really BELIEVE us for a split second, even if we say in advance that we are not going to hit the USA, are we just going to shy away from Belgium?
      1. +1
        2 February 2023 04: 17
        Quote from: dump22
        where exactly are the rockets going?

        Imagine yes. Why rockets? For tactical nuclear weapons, one hypersonic one with the right filling is enough.
        Quote from: dump22
        The answer will be launched immediately upon the very first detection

        Did they tell you at NATO headquarters or at the Pentagon? Have you read materials on responding to mass rocket launches from the 70s ???

        Write with such condescension, as if you are an officer of the Strategic Missile Forces in gray hair, who has been on the consoles on duty at such moments to a simple child in the sandbox. Lower your tone. It is obvious that you are not even close to an expert in this matter.
        1. -1
          2 February 2023 12: 48
          Why rockets? For tactical nuclear weapons, one hypersonic one with the right filling is enough.


          Well, let's imagine the best (from your point of view) situation - we launched ONE of our hypersonic missiles with a nuclear warhead on hypothetical Belgium (although you'd better take Poland, Belgium is too close to nuclear France, but this is not important). Purely for intimidation.
          Let's assume that the early warning system did not react to it, no one launched anything in response, and it looks like it's just that in Belgium (or Poland) a dozen kilotons were suddenly fired.
          Well, what kind of reaction after all this do you imagine?

          How can we convince the rest of the world that we WILL NOT continue further, that we will stop there? Why is it that the United States, France and Great Britain suddenly believe us that it is we who exclusively decided to punish the Belgians in this way?

          But it's good, but let's say even further - they will believe us. Let's even assume that NATO spit on the 5th paragraph of its charter and will not stand up for Belgium, get scared and leave it.
          Well, what are we going to achieve?

          That the West will get scared and will comply with all our demands?
          :-)))
          First of all, we will achieve a monstrous arms race throughout the world. Moreover, the race is precisely nuclear, although of course also conventional weapons.
          The same Belgium will throw all its efforts into the creation of its own nuclear weapons and in 3-5 years it will certainly create it. They have enough technical potential, even if the North Koreans had enough.
          The FRG will see that NATO's notorious "nuclear umbrella" does not exist, that the United States will also abandon them, like Belgium, and that Belgium will also make its own nuclear weapons even faster. Italy and at least 7-8 other countries in Europe will do the same. Even in the same way, Poland will be able to master the production of nuclear weapons, insane fear will betray their strength.

          Well, what are we going to do with such a horde of nuclear countries that are hostile to us? What benefit will we derive from this? Where is the notorious "profit"?
  7. +8
    1 February 2023 20: 23
    If you need to beat .. then you need to beat first, preventively. It’s time to move on from threats to actions. And so the next concern.
  8. +1
    1 February 2023 20: 43
    Well, now, after such a "warning", all deliveries of weapons to beggars will definitely stop. But, seriously, the situation is a dead end.
    1. +1
      1 February 2023 21: 05
      The situation became a dead end due to the lack of political will in one person.

      One cannot show normal strength, but the whole army suffers.
  9. -1
    2 February 2023 04: 38
    In China - the last warning, in Russia - red lines, and in the Soviet Union - there was one who is scolded to this day, but with a "slipper" blow on the podium, he made everyone wake up!
    1. 0
      2 February 2023 11: 00
      A well-known fake, dispersed by American journalists. There was no slipper hit there
  10. 0
    2 February 2023 15: 20
    Once upon a time, back in the days of the USSR, small notes were periodically printed in central newspapers such as Pravda or Socialist Industry. They said that in such and such a square of the World Ocean with such and such coordinates at such and such a time it is highly recommended not to enter sea and aircraft, both civilian and military. For something ballistic is flying into this square in order to strengthen the combat capability of the Soviet Army and Navy, and those who did not hide are those evil Pinocchio themselves. The world community muttered muffledly, but the ships were diverted in order to avoid. It is clear that these carriers did not have any nuclear warheads, but the effect was very convincing! What prevents now to look for a rocket in the bins, which is not a pity, unscrew the warhead and shoot somewhere towards the North Pole? And on the approach to blow up over the ice, so as not to spoil ourselves. And announce to everyone before the launch that we are for the world, but tobacco apart, like in the good old days. It will be much more convincing than screaming at the UN, and not very expensive, except for frightened bears, seals and the peoples of the Far North.
  11. 0
    2 February 2023 19: 24
    Were you not warned before? Ah, they warned ... And - what? Did it work? Not? And now it will definitely work...
  12. 0
    3 February 2023 01: 24
    Quote from Krivobokoff
    I just remind you that it was not Korea, not Vietnam, not Afghanistan, not other Africa that caused a direct clash of nuclear powers

    this is a completely different war ....
  13. 0
    3 February 2023 01: 25
    Quote: ViPirozhnikow
    The situation became a dead end due to the lack of political will in one person.

    One cannot show normal strength, but the whole army suffers.

    hardly, you need to think bigger ....
  14. 0
    3 February 2023 01: 27
    Quote: lubesky
    If the scenario worsens for us, it becomes necessary to use tactical nuclear weapons in Belgium or Holland. There will be a lot of minuses from this, but only this can sober up the sponsors of the junkie and in the sobering and ringing silence their answer can confuse them. After all, the Russians attacked not a nuclear power, but also not the Eastern buffer Slavs, on the other hand, the Belgians and the Dutch are still not Americans, French and Saxons ...

    Why Belgium or Holland? and why, for example, not America immediately?
  15. +1
    3 February 2023 18: 41
    Even after Putin's admission that "we were deceived, roughly speaking, we were thrown" (well, what can I say, they deceived the fool by 4 fists!), We continue to plaintively ask the enemy. But they just laugh at it, they took part in all the inspections for 8 years and didn't see anything. The children and grandchildren of our diplomats in Geneva have already grown up - sometimes they fought for disarmament, sometimes for the climate or something else - and the same people. If you are in Geneva, look from the window of the Palace of Nations at the parking of diplomats - there are limousines sparkling with varnish, and the employees have them small and gray. I think that we need to reconsider the issue of participating in these forums, especially on human rights.
  16. +1
    3 February 2023 18: 57
    After many, many times we failed to carry out our threats, after countless violations by NATO countries of our "red" lines, all our warnings not only lost their meaning, but also sound simply pathetic. It's a shame. There is a big difference between “we can do” and “we will do”, and NATO has become insolent to the extreme, because it realized that we are not going to do anything, and they don’t care why, the main thing is the result.
    1. 0
      3 February 2023 19: 16
      Starpom Lom: plus, because I see this situation from the same angle. By the way, I sometimes read English-language forums, and what is a shame, not just NATO, but ordinary people are already laughing at our empty threats. True, if the British are almost all like that, because they are very zombified, then among the Americans there are quite a few who sympathize with us, oddly enough.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"