Cruise missiles Kh-101 in Special Operations

55
Cruise missiles Kh-101 in Special Operations
Preparing a Tu-160 bomber for a sortie, 2015. Photo by the RF Ministry of Defense


From the first days, a full-fledged participant in the Special Operation for the Protection of Donbass has been a distant aviation aerospace forces. Strategic missile-carrying bombers regularly take to the air and send cruise missiles of various types to their intended targets. Kh-101 missiles, which are distinguished by high tactical and technical characteristics and have other advantages, are widely used in the current operation.



Rocket in Special Operations


The operation began in February last year with a massive missile attack on Ukrainian military infrastructure. As it soon became known, land and sea-based missile systems, as well as long-range aviation of the Aerospace Forces, were involved in these activities. To destroy distant enemy targets, bombers use the entire range of available air-launched cruise missiles (ALCMs), including the new Kh-101.

As far as is known, the Kh-101 missile is used by Tu-95MS and Tu-160 aircraft. After the necessary preparation, the carriers are lifted from the Engels airfield and sent to the launch zone. The high characteristics of modern ALCMs make it possible to launch over the territory of the country and at a great distance from the combat zone.

Further, the missiles independently reach the Ukrainian territory and head for the designated targets. The flight is carried out at low altitude, which helps to pass through the areas of responsibility of the enemy air defense. The target is hit with the highest possible accuracy and with minimal deviation. A high-explosive fragmentation warhead of high power ensures the destruction of various objects, up to fairly large buildings.


Rocket X-101 in the cargo compartment. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Targets for missiles


According to known data, in the first months of the Special Operation, X-101 products were used to strike at certain important objects - warehouses, command posts, etc. Since October, such ALCMs, along with other weapons, have been used as part of massive attacks on infrastructure. Depending on the characteristics of the target, one missile or several can be directed at it. Combinations are also possible. weapons different types.

The Ministry of Defense has not yet published detailed information on the use of Kh-101 missiles. However, it can be assumed that up to several hundred such products have already been used and a comparable number of targets have been hit. In general, such ALCMs show high efficiency, which is confirmed by the means of objective control. In addition, the Ukrainian side regularly receives photos and videos showing overflights and hits of the X-101. These materials may be indirect confirmation of the effectiveness of Russian missiles.

It is curious that after each missile strike the Kiev regime “reports on the successes” of its air defense. Each time it is claimed that dozens of UAVs and ALCMs were shot down, including Kh-101 products. However, in reality, almost all missiles and Drones cope with the tasks and hit the assigned targets.

It should be recognized that not all cruise missiles succeed in fulfilling their mission. A small percentage of products are indeed shot down by enemy air defense - albeit with great difficulty and with an increased consumption of anti-aircraft missiles. There are also technical problems leading to the fall of the rocket. However, all these are quite rare cases, and almost all Kh-101 ALCMs, like other weapons, achieve their goals.


X-101 on the external suspension of the Tu-95MS missile carrier. Photo Lostarmour.info

In recent months, the use of Kh-101 missiles has become regular and massive. This practice demonstrates high efficiency, and, apparently, it will not be abandoned. This means that modern ALCMs will remain full participants in the forced demilitarization of Ukraine.

Modern weapons


The Kh-101 ALCM is the newest munition in service with Russian long-range aviation. The development of this product and its nuclear version with the X-102 index has been carried out since the mid-nineties. By the end of the 2015s, the rocket was tested, and in the first half of the last decade it completed the necessary checks and was recommended for adoption. In 101, the X-XNUMX serial products were used for the first time on real targets in Syria.

The Kh-101 missile can be considered a development of the ideas laid down earlier in the Kh-55/555 project. During its development, well-mastered and time-tested ideas and solutions were used. At the same time, new technologies and components were introduced.

For the X-101 product, a new reduced visibility airframe was developed. It has an elongated fuselage with a folding wing and tail. The airframe is distinguished by special forms of external surfaces and structural materials. It is reported that the ALCM in this design is able to break through air defense more effectively than the previous Kh-55/555.

The mid-flight turbojet engine with limited thrust and low resource has been preserved. It provides high subsonic flight speed. The maximum range is 5500 km. High flight performance allows you to make the best flight routes, taking into account possible threats.


Missile flight somewhere over Ukraine. Photo Telegram / ChDambiev

According to known data, the X-101 received a combined control system. It includes an autopilot, inertial and satellite navigation aids. Also reported is the presence of radar or optoelectronic correction according to the reference map of the area - throughout the flight or near the target. Now foreign specialized media are discussing photos of the X-101 ALCM that fell somewhere in Ukraine. This product has a window with a lens, which indicates the use of optical means.

Like older domestic ALCMs, the modern Kh-101 is equipped with a high-explosive fragmentation warhead. Weight - 400 kg. Practice has shown that such a warhead copes with the destruction of various buildings, effectively hits warehouses, clusters of equipment, etc. The Kh-102 unified cruise missile, in turn, is equipped with a special warhead. The power of the nuclear warhead has not yet been reported.

The carriers of Kh-101 missiles are the main strategic bombers-missile carriers of the Russian Aerospace Forces. So, the Tu-160 carries missiles of all main types on two internal drum sets - up to 12 units in total. The missiles are also compatible with the upgraded Tu-95MS missile carrier. This aircraft carries ALCMs on an external sling on pylons under the wing, a total of 8 units.

Combat experience


Cruise missiles X-101 were first used on a real target in November 2015 during the Syrian operation. Subsequently, the Tu-95MS and Tu-160 bombers repeatedly delivered such items to the launch area, and then they hit the designated targets. In total, several dozen missiles were used up and practically all the intended targets in the form of certain terrorist targets were hit.


Hit X-101 on target. A smoky trail of a fallen rocket is visible. A large cloud of smoke is a consequence of the explosion of a missed missile defense system. Photo Telegram / "Militarist's Heart"

In Syria, the new domestic ALCMs have confirmed the design characteristics and demonstrated at least part of their capabilities. It should be noted that the missiles were used in a specific situation. The enemy, represented by terrorist organizations, did not have full-fledged air defense and had only individual weapons with limited characteristics.

Since February-March last year, X-101 products have been used to demilitarize Ukraine. This time they had to face a full-fledged army with a variety of anti-aircraft systems. However, the presence of air defense, built according to Soviet standards, did not help the enemy. X-101 successfully overcome radar fields and zones of destruction of air defense systems, after which they hit the indicated targets. Air defense losses are minimal and do not affect the overall results of strikes. Moreover, such risks are taken into account at the stage of strike preparation, and the necessary measures are taken.

Work continues


The Kh-101 air-launched cruise missile and its nuclear Kh-102 variant entered service with the Aerospace Forces just a few years ago. However, since then they have managed to take part in two military operations and hit a large number of ground targets. At the same time, the Special Operation in Ukraine has not yet been completed - and it can be expected that long-range bombers will continue to launch cruise missiles of all types, including the Kh-101.

During operation and combat use, the X-101 product confirmed the calculated characteristics and showed high efficiency in solving all the tasks. Having advantages over its predecessors, this missile will soon have to completely displace them and completely occupy the most important niche. And this will further improve the capabilities of our long-range aviation.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. KCA
    -8
    2 February 2023 05: 47
    The use of X-101, and even more so the possible X-102, is top secret information, or what? Or is everything possible now?
    1. +15
      2 February 2023 06: 38
      The use of X-101, and even more so the possible X-102, is top secret information, or what? Or is everything possible now?

      For whom are they secret, if in fact the United States has already fully familiarized itself with their ability to be intercepted by missile defense forces in Ukraine?
      1. +5
        2 February 2023 08: 05
        The flight pattern is the same as that of the Americans: the difference is in the nuances ...
    2. 0
      2 February 2023 07: 21
      Duc, nothing is really secret and is not reported! All right ! TTX "products" are given in the "open press" for a very long time! The results of the application, especially when they turned out to be very positive, are not hidden; there is a need to advertise weapons! (The meaning of this is simple (!) ...: the more you can sell later ... the more "products" will be produced, the lower the cost of each "thing" will be ... the more they can be produced "for yourself" at a much lower cost and, at the same time, get decent money for further development and improvement of weapons, and expansion of production!)
      1. 0
        2 February 2023 18: 59
        I apologize for interrupting, but they are unlikely to sell such products. Our carriers.
    3. +14
      2 February 2023 07: 24
      After one of the x-101s blurted out on the territory of the Vinnitsa region, it is probably no longer a secret. She's probably already dragged to the United States
      1. 0
        2 February 2023 11: 29
        Quote: igorbrsv
        After one of the x-101s blurted out on the territory of the Vinnitsa region, it is probably no longer a secret. She's probably already dragged to the United States


        Well, 5 years ago, the same Butovsky wrote in the Western press about the development of the X-50 KR and GZUR for the VKS. That is, there will be a change for the X-101.
      2. 0
        2 February 2023 13: 57
        Of course, already in the striped ones. And the ukrainian who found a kilo of fat is supposed to.
      3. +2
        3 February 2023 11: 10



        in any garage car service by next Friday they will make it like new! wink
    4. AAK
      0
      2 February 2023 20: 42
      Secret, in addition to the detailed device of the X-101 (but this is no longer a secret, given the study by Bandera-USA of several remaining relatively intact missiles shot down and dropped due to malfunctions), are tactics for their use and means of countering air defense. There are no secrets in this article from the word at all.
  2. -3
    2 February 2023 07: 21
    Wikipedia on these missiles says about the defeat of a kindergarten, tsipso and got into Wikipedia.
    1. +9
      2 February 2023 12: 51
      tsipso and got into wikipedia.
      Wikipedia has always been a Russophobic biased 100% pro-Western resource.
  3. -2
    2 February 2023 07: 32
    Perhaps it is worth developing a "false target" ("simulator") on the basis of the X-101, the main "conditions" of which are simplicity and low cost compared to the "real" X-101! How to do this - experts know, especially if even I "have options"! wink
    1. +7
      2 February 2023 09: 15
      Buddy! Let me tell you in an amateurish way what an imitator is. This is a small blank rocket filled to capacity with fuel, which allows it to fly far. A flying gas tank with its own engine. Of the electronics, only a size simulator that shows it on the radar screen as an "adult" missile. That's basically it. Therefore, its launch is cheap. And here "based on the X-101"?
      1. +2
        2 February 2023 11: 00
        Quote: Just_Kvasha
        That's basically it

        Yes, not everything is in the "principle"! fool There is also a control (guidance) system ... except that they are trying to make it simpler, cheaper ... There is an "autopilot" that simulates the flight path of a "real" missile launcher, if the missile uses a complex flight path ... On a "false target "containers with chaff, heat traps can be installed ... You are right about one thing ... they try to make aviation (!) "false targets" small-sized ("lightweight") in order to take them on board the aircraft as much as possible, not " infringing "very much ammunition! But it's not always "necessary"! For example, when launching "Caliber" from ships in the Caspian Sea, when ships such as self-propelled barges can be adapted to launch "false targets" ... . IL-76 ... Finally, launching from the ground from "railway containers", as shown by the Iranians during the launch of the "Shahed-136"! The use of "real CD" in "simulators" of gliders makes it difficult to visually identify (and even otherwise ...) targets by means of air defense and reduce the cost of production of LC!
        1. +1
          2 February 2023 11: 20
          I stated the essence so that a person would not flog nonsense: it hurts!
          1. -1
            2 February 2023 11: 56
            Well, everyone defines nonsense to the extent of their mental development ... or underdevelopment!
    2. +3
      2 February 2023 11: 11
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      Perhaps it is worth developing a "false target" ("simulator") on the basis of the X-101, the main "conditions" of which are simplicity and low cost compared to the "real" X-101!

      Hehehehe ... at one time, the Americans developed a false long-range air-based target - to break through Soviet air defense. As a result, it turned out that simply adding a warhead to it makes it work much more efficiently.
      So the United States got the AGM-86 ALCM ALCM. smile
      1. -2
        2 February 2023 12: 17
        Well, we have different examples! You have: from the LC - the "real" KR ... I have: based on the KR-LC!
        For example, on the basis of the "kamikaze" drone "Geranium-2" it is possible to make a cheaper (and therefore, if necessary, more massive ...) LC! 1. Of the guidance systems, leave, for example, only INS (it is possible, not in the "coolest" version, but cheaper ...). With a "cheap" INS, the probability of hitting "civilian" objects increases, therefore there is no real warhead ... it is replaced by containers with chaff to "deceive" the radar of air defense systems, with heat traps to "deceive" IR.GOS, for example, MANPADS. .. That is, basically, the "Gerani-2" glider made of composite (yes, even made of cardboard!) And a gasoline engine for "civilian" use!
        1. 0
          2 February 2023 12: 57
          gasoline engine of "civilian" use!
          It will not allow you to develop sufficient speed to simulate real targets.
        2. 0
          2 February 2023 14: 00
          People do not yet take into account the ability of the device to emit EPR and electronic copying to create a false phantom field-copy of the rocket. Which goes next to the main rocket. Or they don't know about it.
    3. +2
      2 February 2023 13: 51
      I don’t need to write such a mess anymore. Annoying.
    4. 0
      4 February 2023 00: 14
      And why are you not satisfied with the E95 target, which has been mass-produced by Enix JSC for many years. Or are you new to this topic?
  4. +1
    2 February 2023 07: 43
    X-55 already over? There was also an X-15 missile in the arsenal of strategists.
  5. +5
    2 February 2023 08: 37
    "... this missile will soon have to completely displace them and completely occupy the most important niche. And this will further improve the capabilities of our long-range aviation."
    For this, it is necessary to further improve the possibilities of our economy.
  6. +4
    2 February 2023 10: 53
    The article itself is rubbish, there are questions to the last photo.

    The anti-aircraft defense missile should not kinetically hit the enemy's cruise missile (X-101), its fuse is triggered remotely in order to be guaranteed to hit the target with many small submunitions.


    The smoke from the explosion of an anti-missile in the immediate vicinity of the point of impact of the attacking missile also speaks, more likely, of a successful hit than a miss - they hit and the flight ended.

    Finally, an explosion in a civilian area with no clearly visible military targets is also more likely to miss than to hit the target.
    1. 0
      2 February 2023 14: 08
      An anti-aircraft missile should not kinetically hit an enemy cruise missile

      only if her warhead is not shock-kinetic)))
      1. 0
        2 February 2023 15: 22
        Leaving aside the question - which specific air defense anti-missiles have kinetic warheads (on this theater of operations I only know Brimstone MANPADS), I will ask about the "detonation cloud" kinetic Warhead - where is it in the picture ???
        1. 0
          3 February 2023 13: 29
          I’ll ask about the “detonation cloud” of a kinetic warhead - where is it from in the picture

          And you do not believe the caption to the photo. These "literates" consider the smoke from the gap of the previous hit, blown away by the wind, to be a smoky trail from missiles.
          Leaving aside the question - which specific air defense anti-missiles have kinetic warheads (on this theater of operations I only know Brimstone MANPADS)

          And why did you decide to link the question to "this TVD" if the primary message is not so personalized.?
          ERINT, THAAD, RIM-161
      2. +2
        2 February 2023 19: 08
        They don't seem to be used against tactical cruise missiles. More effective "shrapnel" to stop the flight. But against ballistic ones with their weight and speed ... here a small pellet will not take such a boar.
        There's a kinetic interception
      3. 0
        8 February 2023 21: 05
        only if her warhead is not shock-kinetic

        And how many of these missiles does Ukraine have? As I remember, there are not so many such anti-aircraft missiles in the world. And there was no talk about the supply of these to / to Ukraine
    2. 0
      2 February 2023 20: 52
      Are you not with cisso for an hour? A photo from a famous video, in Dnepropetrovsk, an arrival through the shops where the point-y was being repaired. The beech rocket flew by. Smoke from the hit of the previous missile, and there was also a video from the ground, as the air defense missile self-destructed, and after a couple of seconds, the Kh-101 flew on its own business
    3. 0
      4 February 2023 00: 16
      The contrail from the rocket engine clearly goes to the ground, which means that there were no engine malfunctions or a change in the rocket trajectory. The missile clearly hit the target and dived. Everything else is your speculation.
  7. 0
    2 February 2023 13: 46
    For some reason, completely new, in fact strategic (x-102) and secret Kh-101 missiles do not have a self-destruct device in emergency situations. It won't lead to anything good.
    1. 0
      3 February 2023 23: 46
      Well, there was an emergency situation - a rocket fell on a barn in the Volgograd region. If it would self-destruct there would be victims and destruction, and so just repair the roof of the barn, give the owner a hundred thousand so as not to be angry
  8. 0
    2 February 2023 20: 31
    They could have done self-destruction of the rocket when it hit the ground,
    e.g. from a piezo sensor
  9. 0
    2 February 2023 20: 44
    Why not revive the idea of ​​a flying balloon platform (airship ala zepellin) to launch a large number of cruise missiles without burning engine resources and generally using strategists in such wars? We equip the airship in the rear with two dozen crs deep, raise it up above the airfield and reset the cr - the cr range allows you to fly yourself, the airship can be autonomous by wire control, plus a large carrying capacity. Protection of the standard air defense of the home airfield, and since it does not fly anywhere, it makes no sense for it to overcome the enemy's air defense. Again, cheaper to manufacture and maintain than a strategist and engine replacement, plus fuel. Protection is simpler, it’s not necessary to spend money on pilots again.
    1. +1
      2 February 2023 22: 23
      Why raise anything at all? Add a starting powder booster and launch from a soil complex, like the R-500. It is necessary to raise it in order to finish it off to another continent, and not 1000 km from the airfield
    2. +1
      2 February 2023 23: 29
      Crews of strategists need to train for doomsday, not fly airships. But they launch expensive full-time materiel for tactical purposes. Where possible there were cheaper calibers.
      1. 0
        3 February 2023 04: 15
        But I didn’t say that the crews of strategists should be transferred to airship platforms, for this, in general, a crew is not needed. She can climb up and down herself. Just saving the resource of the engines, the airframe. Strategists can perform direct defense duties and strikes at distant countries and at border countries in the defense of the offensive and behind-the-eye platforms.
        1. 0
          6 February 2023 11: 33
          People (crews, technicians) must work in the standard mode so that the launches of the X-102 at hour "X" take place normally and routinely.
    3. 0
      3 February 2023 11: 13
      This has already been done, but as in the joke about Rabinovich, not by us and not from the airship:
      1. 0
        3 February 2023 12: 49
        That's bad that not us. And the resource of strategists is very expensive and will still come in handy. And dirigibles can also be used as a deliverer of heavy loads to the north in peacetime.
  10. 0
    2 February 2023 22: 06
    Quote: igorbrsv
    After one of the x-101s blurted out on the territory of the Vinnitsa region, it is probably no longer a secret. She's probably already dragged to the United States


    - For some reason, it is never written about self-liquidators in such cases, systems for remote detonation of ground equipment, in case of its forced abandonment on the battlefield ....
    1. +2
      3 February 2023 02: 54
      For tasks in Ukraine, the X-101 has insufficient warhead power and excessive range. It is desirable to reduce the range by half, replacing the fuel with an increased warhead. Actually X-101 is a by-product from X-102, therefore, not in a special version, it is not balanced in terms of performance characteristics. By the way, this is one of the answers why bridges still work. We need more rockets, different ones.
      1. 0
        3 February 2023 23: 44
        The norms are there with power, three or four pieces will destroy almost any bridge, and in Ukraine in 2021 almost all of them are recognized as emergency. And these missiles are wasted because they are being replaced by the X-50 (which is large, not a hundred kilograms) and the hypersonic X-BD. In any case, the first was shown to Medvedev the other day, how it is with hypersonic is still unclear
        1. 0
          5 February 2023 17: 47
          Type Dragon's Mouth on YouTube - a bridge that survived 831 American strikes and 7 years of 400 kg bombing is absolutely not enough to destroy strategic bridges.
        2. 0
          8 February 2023 21: 09
          Please share a link about Medvedev and X-50. Haven't heard anything about the last one in a long time.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        8 February 2023 21: 13
        Everything about the X-101 is excellent both with the warhead and with the range. Simply, figuratively speaking, you have to hit hares from a large caliber. They didn’t have time to cut the little ones. For a long time there was talk about the "half" of the X-101, which was nicknamed the X-50, with a relatively tactical range of 1500 km - but something calmed down later
  11. 0
    3 February 2023 16: 17
    This means that modern ALCMs will remain full participants in the forced demilitarization of Ukraine.

    Meanwhile, statements about forced demilitarization or denazification have long since left the public space. Which can't be stressful. And they were replaced by other statements, like the recent Matvienkovsky about "we are ready for peace negotiations without preconditions."
  12. 0
    6 February 2023 11: 31
    Apparently, Caliber and X-101 need to be made in large quantities in peacetime (to warehouses) .... in order to have reserves in case of SVO.
    1. 0
      8 February 2023 21: 16
      Russia, among other things, has been doing just that in recent years.
  13. 0
    10 March 2023 18: 00
    a cheap analogue of kp for hitting a stationary target can be made relatively quickly and cheaply, as well as a decoy and a target for air defense training on the same basis. Why don't they, that's the question...
  14. 0
    29 March 2023 13: 54
    The maximum range is 5500 km. High flight performance allows you to make the best flight routes, taking into account possible threats.


    But isn't the use of the X-101 at objects in Ukraine shooting "from a cannon at sparrows" since the maximum flight range of 5500 km allows you to hit targets on Ukrainian territory from Siberia.

    In the arsenal of the Aerospace Forces there are Kh-555 missiles with a similar warhead-400kg and a range of 2000 km, although even they can be fired from the Urals at least in Kyiv, even in Lvov.

    Testing missiles in combat conditions is of course of great importance, but firing hundreds of "golden" missiles at objects that can be destroyed with cheaper ammunition by an order or two, for example, adjustable glide bombs, is not just "not logical", but criminal.

    If suddenly the conflict in Ukraine takes a tougher turn and things come to the massive use of tactical nuclear weapons, it is unlikely that five hundred or six hundred X-102s will be in the arsenals of the Aerospace Forces at the right time to cover targets in Europe and the United States.
    I am more than sure that there will be 50-60 of them, one for each strategic bomber, as it is written in the contract that no one is complying with.
    Or then they will fly to certain death at one end of the Su-24/34 with suspended free-falling bombs with tactical nuclear warheads, paying with their lives for someone else's discord.
  15. A.M
    0
    24 October 2023 16: 31
    Today I read the news from the yellow press that they proposed bombing Kyiv with a Soyuz-2.1b missile. I thought what kind of bird, and then I looked at the cost of the X-101 ~900 million versus the Union 1400 million, well, as if along a ballistic trajectory from space, even if the air defense damages a rocket with 8 tons of explosives in an armored capsule...))

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"