Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba announced that Ukraine will receive up to 140 tanks as part of the "first wave of deliveries"

78
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba announced that Ukraine will receive up to 140 tanks as part of the "first wave of deliveries"

Ukraine will receive Tanks Western production in several "waves", follows from the statement of the head of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry Dmitry Kuleba. In the first wave, Kyiv expects the delivery of the bulk of heavy armored vehicles.

The coalition of Western countries planning the transfer of tanks to Kyiv, today has 12 countries. According to the same Kuleba, it is too early to say who will supply tanks, how much and when, since most of these countries have not yet decided. But Kyiv expects that in the first wave, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will receive from 120 to 140 Western-made tanks.



As part of the first wave of provision, the armed forces of Ukraine will receive from 120 to 140 units of modern tanks of Western models. These are Leopard 2, Challenger 2, M1 Abrams. And we really count on Leclerc

- said the Ukrainian minister.

Judging by Kuleba’s statement, the first wave of tank deliveries will drag on for quite a long time, since the United States, for example, plans to send their M1 Abrams no earlier than the end of this year, or even in 2024. And the German Leopard 2 is still not clear. There is a feeling that the Ukrainian minister put everything together and blurted out without thinking, revealing the regime's dream of getting more tanks right away. With the coalition, too, everything is not as simple as the head of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry is trying to make, some countries have already left it, refusing to supply armored vehicles, others will not enter it. There is a Poland with great ambitions, and three Baltic limitrophes that are cheering for Warsaw.

Recall that to date Kyiv has been promised 14 Leopard 2A6 tanks from Germany, 14 Challenger 2 tanks from Great Britain and 14 Leopard 2A4 tanks from Poland. They should act in the spring of this year, starting from March, ending with the end of May. Another 31 M1 Abrams tanks were promised by the Americans, but not before the end of the year.
  • https://t.me/milinua
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    31 January 2023 17: 59
    And we, as I understand it, will sit down to keep statistics of what has been delivered and then fight back for another year somewhere in the Donetsk region. I see that some of the Kremlin experts have already begun to sing - what a garbage they say, let's click, covering up the cowardice of the authorities.
    1. +4
      31 January 2023 18: 20
      Quote: IvanIvanov
      some of the Kremlin experts have already begun to sing - what a garbage they say, let's click, covering up the cowardice of the authorities.


      Well, let them go and click themselves, nutcrackers ... fool
    2. +6
      31 January 2023 18: 21
      Quote: IvanIvanov
      . I see that some of the Kremlin experts have already begun to sing - what the hell, let's click

      Well, do not click on them ...
      1. +2
        31 January 2023 18: 36
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        Quote: IvanIvanov
        . I see that some of the Kremlin experts have already begun to sing - what the hell, let's click

        Well, do not click on them ...

        Caused disgust Putin's words that click. What are they ..... For their Wishlist and greed, they are ready to lay down the whole country.
        1. +5
          31 January 2023 18: 45
          Quote: lis-ik
          Caused disgust Putin's words that click.


          He was also horrified by his words that he was sure that "Russia in Ukraine has not lost anything and will not lose anything" ...
          And this is our President...
          1. -5
            31 January 2023 18: 56
            Quote: Shoulder straps
            Russia has not lost anything in Ukraine and will not lose anything"...

            So what has Russia lost or will lose? List the list. let's see. Or you just wail like a grandmother in the market.
            1. +10
              31 January 2023 19: 05
              Quote from: topol717
              Quote: Shoulder straps
              Russia has not lost anything in Ukraine and will not lose anything"...

              So what has Russia lost or will lose? List the list. let's see. Or you just wail like a grandmother in the market.


              Well, I don't even know... request
              Maybe a huge number of lives of the able-bodied male population, which will INEVITABLY affect both the Russian economy and the demography in our country? Not? Didn't think?
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. 0
                5 February 2023 20: 31
                Quote: Shoulder straps
                Well, I don't even know...

                Well, I don't know either.
                Do you seriously think that the state before February 22 could last forever? Don't you understand that the outskirts, thanks to Minsk-2 and the West, have been accumulating strength? Don't you understand that she saved up her strength not only to regain Donbass, but also Crimea? But, in the event of such a development of events, would we not have to lose "a huge number of lives of able-bodied male ..."? And, in this case, we would lose them on OUR territory, I mean Crimea. And it would be much more difficult to defend the Crimea, given that the first thing the okraintsy would do is that they would destroy the bridge. Have you thought about it? No?
            2. +6
              31 January 2023 19: 11
              For example, thousands of dead men.
            3. +6
              31 January 2023 19: 43
              Quote from: topol717
              So what has Russia lost or will lose?

              How many soldiers have we already lost there? How many civilians?
              1. 0
                5 February 2023 20: 35
                Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                Quote from: topol717
                So what has Russia lost or will lose?

                How many soldiers have we already lost there? How many civilians?

                Do you want to say that in vain we started a CBO? That the state before February 22 would continue forever?
        2. -2
          31 January 2023 18: 57
          Quote: lis-ik
          Caused disgust Putin's words that click. What are they ..... For their Wishlist and greed, they are ready to lay down the whole country.

          Well, what to do? don't click? give up? Or just drop everything and leave? let's tell me what to do with these tanks? I didn't understand about greed at all. what is it for?
          1. +4
            31 January 2023 19: 12
            It was necessary to do so that the tanks were not delivered or did not reach their destination.
            1. 0
              31 January 2023 21: 13
              Please share your thoughts on how to do this.
              1. 0
                1 February 2023 08: 06
                Everyone here has the same opinion - to start a nuclear war ... After all, it's cool to shoot vigorous loaves on the Internet
                1. 0
                  1 February 2023 20: 46
                  Here everyone has one opinion - this is to start a nuclear war

                  finally


              2. 0
                1 February 2023 20: 59
                Please share how to do it.

                There is an opinion that it is necessary to destroy tank farms, gas stations, refineries and tanks, using geraniums and calibers. If the APU is left without fuel, then not only tanks, but also the rest of the equipment will not be able to drive.
                It is also necessary to organize a complete fuel embargo in Banderstat, those countries and firms that supply oil should be disconnected from the pipe.
                True, here we are faced with the interests of the oligarchic regime of the Russian Federation, which cannot sell resources 1: 1, but sells too much that dollars have to be sterilized by buying securities
                1. 0
                  5 February 2023 20: 56
                  Quote: nickname7

                  There is an opinion that it is necessary to destroy tank farms, gas stations, refineries and tanks, using geraniums and calibers.

                  Well, they are destroyed. Konashenkov constantly reports to you about this. Oh yes, I forgot - he's still lying. Well, and so, I dare to assure you, explored, and where we can get it, are necessarily destroyed. Well, where we can’t get it, then ... excuse me.
                  And, just do not think that the enemy is completely headless. They, too, are not born with a bastard - they dispersed the fuel storage facilities, made them small in order to shoot Caliber at them, even if they were discovered, it was unprofitable. In general, not everything is as simple as it might seem watching from the couch. hi
            2. 0
              5 February 2023 20: 38
              Quote: Kronos
              It was necessary to do so that the tanks were not delivered or did not reach their destination.

              You are Putin. Your actions? You are Lavrov. Your actions? Finally you are Gerasimov. Your actions?
          2. +4
            31 January 2023 19: 22
            Quote from: topol717
            Well, what to do?


            And it was necessary to do it after 1991, all these past three decades had to be done. To build relations with Ukraine in such a way that what happened never happened.
            That's who failed it all - let him fix it now. With his own forces and the forces of loyal volunteers, he does not throw the whole country into this meat grinder.
            1. +2
              31 January 2023 21: 15
              Well, in hindsight, everyone is smart. And everyone knows what to do. But let me remind you of the Kursk nuclear submarine. when they tried to save him, it suddenly turned out that nothing was working in the Army. Or were you not in the Army in the 90s and early 2000s??
            2. 0
              1 February 2023 22: 29
              With his own forces and the forces of loyal volunteers, he does not throw the whole country into this meat grinder.

              Those. Katz offers to surrender? So we will sit behind the Urals and wait for the Abrams to drive along Red Square, because you have been offended. Well, then what? Then what will you do, how to live, with whom and under whom?
            3. 0
              5 February 2023 21: 02
              Quote: Shoulder straps
              That's who failed it all - let him fix it now.

              You propose to call: Gorbachev, Yakovlev, Shevardnadze, Yeltsin, Burbulis, well, what am I listing, you already know them. Do you have a connection to the underworld? So call soon!
          3. +2
            31 January 2023 22: 48
            Well, what to do? don't click? give up? Or just drop everything and leave? let's tell me what to do with these tanks? I didn't understand about greed at all. what is it for?

            It is necessary to drown vehicles with tanks, destroy entry points
            1. 0
              31 January 2023 23: 47
              Quote: IvanIvanov
              Well, what to do? don't click? give up? Or just drop everything and leave? let's tell me what to do with these tanks? I didn't understand about greed at all. what is it for?
              It is necessary to drown vehicles with tanks, destroy entry points

              Well, i.e. in the mediterranean? Or right in the Atlantic? and where should the Polish and German leopards be drowned?
              1. -1
                1 February 2023 11: 46
                Well, i.e. in the mediterranean? Or right in the Atlantic? and where should the Polish and German leopards be drowned?

                Well, i.e. yes, right where we get it. I can even describe the sequence of actions
            2. 0
              5 February 2023 21: 10
              Quote: IvanIvanov
              It is necessary to drown vehicles with tanks, destroy entry points

              Yes? Where, in international waters? So this is Casus belli
              And Canada sent the tanks by plane. What, shoot down? On international airlines? Another one is Casus belli. Do you want the entire NATO armada to fall on us, already justifiably?
        3. -1
          1 February 2023 22: 33
          Caused disgust Putin's words that click.

          Maybe he chose the wrong tone and touched the thin strings of your soul, but what was the president of Russia supposed to say? That we give up and we're scared? There are so many traitors in the rear, not only at the top, but everywhere that victory is not just given.
        4. 0
          5 February 2023 20: 16
          [quote = lis-ik. They are ready to lay down the whole country for their wishes and greed. [/ quote]
          Please explain.
      2. +1
        31 January 2023 18: 38
        They will click, but here I can’t write what. feel
    3. +3
      31 January 2023 19: 01
      Quote: IvanIvanov
      And we, as I understand it, will sit down to keep statistics of what was delivered and then fight back for another year somewhere in the Donetsk region

      What can we do? Let's tell me a real way to destroy a tank that is even 100 km away from you, not even 500 km or 1000 km, but let it be only 70 km, and it is being transported, for example, by car. We can even assume that you even know approximately where this car is going. Tell me how to destroy this tank. Come on, what are we going to shoot at the tank ????
      1. -3
        31 January 2023 21: 20
        Cornet, Bassoon, KUV Stugna, KUV Invar, KUV Brass knuckles ... well, under the load of MLRS
      2. +1
        31 January 2023 22: 52
        What can we do? Let's tell me a real way to destroy a tank that is even 100 km away from you
        Sometimes one gets the impression that Putin's advisers give him the same advice in the form of a question, and he himself has no time to think. The tank and other equipment do not get there on their own. Transport must be destroyed (sea, railway) and logistics at any convenient point, as Israel does.
        1. +3
          31 January 2023 23: 51
          Quote: IvanIvanov
          Transport must be destroyed (sea, railway) and logistics at any convenient point, as Israel does.

          And what transport, what transport? Germany won put 40 tractors to transport tanks, how are you going to destroy them. No, maybe I don’t know what, give your recommendations. But only real, and not as above, Cornet on a tank for 70 km.
          1. 0
            1 February 2023 11: 53
            The task is to isolate the battlefield, that means. 1. hit the sea, if the armored vehicles are American. In Europe, hit the entry points to Ukraine. If it fails to destroy, then, after a warning, 1. hit the same points with the help of tactical nuclear weapons in order to destroy them 2. hit clusters on the territory of Europe.
            There is an alternative - to invite the PRC for solidity, but they are unlikely to agree until the battlefield is isolated and we are not ready to do this by any means
        2. 0
          5 February 2023 21: 15
          Quote: IvanIvanov
          at any convenient point, as Israel does.

          How is Israel doing? Bombing Iranians in Syria? So they are at war with Syria. What are your suggestions?
    4. 0
      1 February 2023 22: 25
      as I understand it, we will sit and keep statistics of the delivered

      What do you propose specifically? Is there a nuclear strike on Germany, Poland, Britain? What can we do with them before the tanks arrive on the front line? Only in such a way that it would be real, and not abstract - to destroy all bridges, all border crossings, destroy all trailers, and all tanks in the places of their transfer to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
    5. 0
      5 February 2023 20: 14
      Quote: IvanIvanov
      I see that some of the Kremlin experts have already begun to sing - what the hell is garbage, let's click, covering up the cowardice of the authorities.

      I would have sent these "experts" with anti-tank grenades from the Second World War or Molotov cocktails to the trenches. Let them burn or click, whatever they like.
  2. -1
    31 January 2023 18: 04
    to date, Kyiv has been promised

    The Lithuanian MBT "Opinion" will be the fastest to arrive.
    1. -5
      31 January 2023 18: 22
      So we'll see how Gerasimov reacts, again, the "red line" has been crossed.)
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. -2
            31 January 2023 19: 28
            Read the news and find out who is trembling over what. Pliznik
            1. 0
              31 January 2023 23: 55
              Quote: notingem
              Read the news and find out who is trembling over what. Pliznik

              Cool link, with a very specific list.
              To a specific question, when there is nothing to say, they always refer to either incomprehensible news, or that they are more often silent at all.
        2. 0
          31 January 2023 22: 56
          The main responder trembles over the state of his own and his friends.

          The "states of friends" are already pretty shabby, this is either cowardice or Gorbachev's idealism, which for decency is called "responsible behavior." But where is this "responsible behavior" leading the country?
  3. +3
    31 January 2023 18: 07
    And that they are, as in the photo, calmly and unhindered from west to east through the whole of Ukraine, they will pass by train to the very front? Who can imagine this during the Great Patriotic War? Trains of the Third Reich were derailed, and now in the 21st century there are much more military instruments.
    1. +3
      31 January 2023 18: 10
      There is a much more modern example - Israel, which hammers wherever it finds without any problems.
      1. +3
        31 January 2023 18: 16
        And he does it right! If the security and territorial integrity of your country and the lives of its citizens are at stake, you should not engage in co-operation, but act extremely harshly.
        1. 0
          1 February 2023 04: 07
          In our case, our leadership, it is obvious that something else is at stake ... Hence the strange not desire, from the beginning of the database, to destroy the transport and energy structure ... And the toothless reaction of our Foreign Ministry to the supply of weapons ...
          1. 0
            1 February 2023 11: 55
            I don’t know what is at stake there, but they won’t get off with a strict reprimand in case of defeat, like all of us, by the way.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +9
        31 January 2023 18: 26
        Behind Israel is a big brother. Take away big brother and see what happens to Israel in 10 years.
        1. +1
          31 January 2023 19: 16
          Yes, they beat the Arabs even without a big brother.
          1. -1
            31 January 2023 21: 22
            Yes, they beat the Arabs even without a big brother.
            ..never
        2. 0
          31 January 2023 22: 59
          Our big brother is a nuclear shield, otherwise what's the point of waving Poseidons / Sarmatians if there is no determination to use it? It would be nice to attract the PRC, for solidity.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +4
      31 January 2023 18: 36
      Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
      Who can imagine this during the Great Patriotic War? P

      I can imagine ... Did the Tigers, Panthers, Ferdinands get to the Kursk Bulge by teleport? Or maybe their partisans derailed?
      1. -2
        31 January 2023 19: 20
        Quote from Bingo
        Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
        Who can imagine this during the Great Patriotic War? P

        I can imagine ... Did the Tigers, Panthers, Ferdinands get to the Kursk Bulge by teleport? Or maybe their partisans derailed?

        The case when you are objective. hi
    4. 0
      31 January 2023 19: 07
      Of course they will go, Abramovich agreed not to touch, and the Slavs disposed of each other ...
    5. +4
      31 January 2023 19: 29
      Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
      And that they are, as in the photo, calmly and unhindered from west to east through the whole of Ukraine, they will pass by train to the very front?

      Yes, they will go, and they will post it on the "Military Review". Personally for you.

      Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
      Who can imagine this during the Great Patriotic War?

      Maybe the Great Patriotic War? Could someone imagine in the USSR that such ignoramuses would appear in the 21st century?

      And yes, the Wehrmacht tanks got to the front and not at all in single copies.

      By the way, the question is, in unison with local commentators, why didn’t Stalin shy away from Sweden and Turkey, which provided the Third Reich with ore and tungsten?
      Why didn’t he shy away from the Czech Republic, which produced military equipment?
      Why didn’t he declare war on France for the supply of aviation components, and not only?

      Maybe Stalin, like Putin, was not as frostbitten as local commentators? Maybe you should measure your capabilities and not "run ahead of the locomotive"?

      If you have not yet understood, then from time immemorial, Russia has won only after it thoroughly studied the strategy and tactics of the enemy, rebuilding its armed forces and economy to new methods of warfare.
      1. Egg
        0
        31 January 2023 20: 14
        Quote: Damir Zakirov
        .

        If I could +100 I would put it, these whiners are sick of it, this jackal flock sits in all topics.
        1. +1
          31 January 2023 20: 32
          Quote: Telur
          Quote: Damir Zakirov
          .

          If I could +100 I would put it, these whiners are sick of it, this jackal flock sits in all topics.

          I, too, used to think that they were "whiners" and "all-weakers", but now I have come to the conclusion that these are "useful idiots".

          Here there are few TsIPSOshnikov and in significant topics they try to place their comment in the top ten. Further, all the work is done by "useful idiots", of which there are many on this forum.
          1. 0
            31 January 2023 22: 47
            Quote: Zakirov Damir
            I, too, used to think that they were "whiners" and "all-weakers", but now I have come to the conclusion that these are "useful idiots".

            Here there are few TsIPSOshnikov and in significant topics they try to place their comment in the top ten. Further, all the work is done by "useful idiots", of which there are many on this forum.


            Here, the 500s are full, judging by the following statements:

            Quote: Shoulder straps
            That's who failed it all - let him fix it now. With his own forces and the forces of loyal volunteers, he does not throw the whole country into this meat grinder.
          2. +1
            31 January 2023 23: 16
            I, too, used to think that they were "whiners" and "all-weakers", but now I have come to the conclusion that these are "useful idiots".

            Do you think that any criticism of the authorities is unacceptable, that "they know better there"?
            What has happened over the past 8 years, gross errors in assessing the situation, preparing the campaign, and simply naivety in places, which resulted in the repeated deception of the Kremlin comrades by Western partners, prove that this, alas, is not so.
            1. -1
              5 February 2023 21: 33
              Quote: IvanIvanov

              Do you think that any criticism of the authorities is unacceptable, that "they know better there"?

              Where did you see criticism on this thread?
              Maybe this is criticism -
              Quote: IvanIvanov
              Our big brother is a nuclear shield, otherwise what's the point of waving Poseidons / Sarmatians if there is no determination to use it? It would be nice to attract the PRC, for solidity.

              Or maybe his other comments are criticism?
              Criticism is when a certain decision is made, and you say - this is wrong, it should be like this. And when time passed, and it began to seem to everyone that the wrong decision had been made and you began to hysteria about it, then this is not criticism, but an attempt to convince readers of your alleged cleverness.
          3. +3
            31 January 2023 23: 33
            Or maybe it's time for people like you to look around you by removing rose-colored glasses? Who went to the obscene Minsk agreement? Who, when the Russians were killed, called the enemy "respected Pyotr Alekseevich"? Who, after the start of this "special operation" began to arrange the Istanbul agreements, ugh, that is, "goodwill gestures." Who spat with relish on the graves of the fallen, releasing a herd of Azov and hirelings to Turkish resorts in exchange for their kuman? Did he take them prisoner to let them go? When reserves were urgently needed in the Kharkov direction, why did a 40-strong group fool around in the Far East, in meaningless "exercises"? Why, when professionals, unlike his Shoigu, talked all spring and summer about the need for mobilization, they were only brushed aside like flies? Yes, the volunteers were driven away from the military registration and enlistment offices - "they will manage without you", yeah, they did it! And when it was secured, they began to feverishly take revenge on everyone. Who has drawn the entire threshold of his bunker with "red lines", but, as before, into the bushes. Now, no one cares about his pouting. Only he and his relatives and friends do not pay with blood, but a simple peasant who is forced to pay with his life for his cowardice, stupidity and worthlessness. Failure on failure, and like you, the defenders of the regime, try the grass. The army is being driven head-on into long-term fortifications that have been created for 8 years, but only a reshuffle is underway, the operation failed here, well, okay, try yourself in another place, here are some more soldiers for you.
            And if you remember that we started with the Stingers, and now the tanks have already gone, but what about the missiles for strikes in Moscow by the summer? But they won’t get him in the bunker, and ordinary people will die. Yes, hell if only conclusions were drawn and these incompetent biathletes were thrown out and professionals were appointed, but no, all the same stupid smug faces living in a parallel reality. Ugh...
        2. 0
          31 January 2023 23: 19
          If I could +100 I would put it, these whiners are sick of it, this jackal flock sits in all topics.

          Careful with the estimates, dear comrade. Maybe it's not the "jackals", but your misunderstanding of what is happening?
      2. +1
        31 January 2023 23: 12
        Why didn’t he shy away from the Czech Republic, which produced military equipment?
        But did Stalin have something to shy away from military factories in the Czech Republic or Romanian oil? Maybe this explains everything?

        Maybe Stalin, like Putin, was not as frostbitten as local commentators? Maybe you should measure your capabilities and not "run ahead of the locomotive"?
        "Steam locomotive" from your tz. should he get to the LBS, so that at the cost of his life, a few mobilized people could deal with him? What do you think the United States would do with our arms convoys to Mexico if they started a war with Mexico?

        then from time immemorial, Russia won only after it thoroughly studied the strategy and tactics of the enemy
        A common but strange argument. Are you denying the Russian Federation the ability to take preemptive action?
      3. 0
        1 February 2023 20: 43
        By the way, the question is, in unison with local commentators, why didn’t Stalin shy away from Sweden and Turkey, which provided the Third Reich with ore and tungsten?

        At that time, Stalin did not have Iskanders.
  4. +2
    31 January 2023 18: 07
    The tongue is given to the diplomat to hide his thoughts. These tanks may already be at the border or in Ukraine.
    1. +5
      31 January 2023 18: 18
      already on the Polish-Ukrainian border, according to Western media.
  5. 0
    31 January 2023 18: 23
    And we really count on Leclerc

    Count further.
  6. +1
    31 January 2023 18: 24
    I fully agree with Kuleba.
    I would even say that there will be two waves.
    The first wave - delivery from the West.
    The second wave is a small upgrade made by Russia.

    1. +4
      31 January 2023 18: 42
      Do you understand that what you are pasting is the M1A1 version? You understand that the M1A2 versions will go to Ukraine, and this is already a slightly different tank? I am always amused by reports of A1M1s destroyed in Iraq, while the US is currently selling A1M2sepv3 versions to Poland that are as similar to those destroyed in Iraq as the T-55s are to the latest T-90 Proryv. You can worry about the photo, but the truth is that many soldiers and tankers will have to give their lives to destroy such a tank, especially since the Leopard A6 has a 2km advantage in firing range. Fighting online is easy, and some here already share the bonus of burnt "cats".
      1. The comment was deleted.
  7. 0
    31 January 2023 18: 27
    Rembases with repair kits must also be supplied to the tanks, technical personnel must be trained. Probably for maintenance will need special tools and equipment. And immediately, at least three different tanks, different manufacturers from three countries. I doubt that specialist wagons will quickly appear at the rembats for all types of equipment at once. In general, the headache is still waiting for them. Otherwise, all the equipment will be like a rubber product - disposable.
    1. 0
      31 January 2023 18: 33
      .In general, the smut is still waiting for them

      And don't worry about them!
    2. +2
      31 January 2023 18: 57
      Yes. And also different shells and kerosene separately for Abrams .. Plus, it’s not very clear how many bridges in Tsegabonia will withstand these mastodons. I'm talking about pontoons. Another plus is trailers and railway platforms for transportation. I don’t think that the Soviet ones will do it - they are designed for somewhat different weights.

      In general - of course not pleasant. But I don’t think it makes sense to fall into despair either. Especially - if our command suddenly decides after a year of war to take up communications across the Dnieper. Regardless of the business interests of the individual close to the body.
  8. -3
    31 January 2023 18: 27
    Something dessert (long-range missiles) is not announced.
    1. 0
      31 January 2023 18: 45
      Such things "doves of peace" - will not be announced from us, only after the requests and requests of the international democratic community, the Balts, Psheks and Slovenes, only as a means of deterring "aggression"
  9. ASM
    0
    31 January 2023 18: 31
    Would you like to understand what a "supply wave" is? This is 2 - 3 years, or ... P-s are already announcing that only the first tanks will go in a year, someone else is broadcasting. Moreover, it is clear that everyone lies, since total lies are their life. But with gradual deliveries, equipment (and ammunition with transport vehicles and minimal spare parts) needs to be stored somewhere, maintained and trained by crews. Or "fists" will be collected from the Poles.
  10. -2
    1 February 2023 00: 35
    wow, they set up a wailing wall here
  11. 0
    1 February 2023 20: 38
    Kuleba masturbates, but before the announcement, he has not yet matured. As the owner from across the ocean says so it will be

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"