From the first experiments to a unique instrument. Trends in the development of domestic thermonuclear weapons

50
From the first experiments to a unique instrument. Trends in the development of domestic thermonuclear weapons
Museum model of the RDS-6s air bomb. Photo militaryrussia.ru


August 2023 marks the 70th anniversary of the test of the first Soviet thermonuclear warhead. This event demonstrated the ability of our industry to create the most advanced weapons, and also determined the path for the further development of nuclear forces. Over the past decades, thermonuclear weapons have come a long way - and still remain one of the foundations of strategic deterrence and national security.



The first experiments


As is known, the first topic of thermonuclear (hydrogen) weapons the US took over. The idea itself appeared in the early forties, and its full implementation began in the second half of the decade. Calculations showed that a conventional nuclear charge has limitations in terms of power, and further growth of this parameter requires new operating principles. In this capacity, they decided to use the nuclear fusion reaction of light elements, and the next few years were spent on research and development of a thermonuclear charge.

The Soviet thermonuclear project started later - in 1949, when the first test of a conventional nuclear bomb was being prepared. Soviet specialists managed to close the gap with their American rivals quite quickly. Moreover, soon they even managed to get ahead and were the first to create a full-fledged ammunition of a new type, suitable for use.

On November 1, 1952, the United States conducted a test under the code Ivy Mike on Enewetak Atoll - the world's first detonation of a thermonuclear weapon. However, the latter was an exclusively experimental product: it was made in the form of a stationary building with the necessary equipment. Such a charge was able to demonstrate the general principles of operation, but there was no question of practical application.


Undermining the first experimental RDS-6s. Photo by the USSR Ministry of Defense

On August 12, 1953, the first Soviet thermonuclear charge, RDS-6s, was detonated at the Semipalatinsk test site. Unlike the American product, it was a complete aviation bomb. It had acceptable dimensions and weight and could be used by the latest Tu-16 bombers or other carriers.

Thus, the possibility of creating ammunition based on nuclear fusion was determined theoretically and confirmed in practice. This allowed the two leading countries to start developing new warheads suitable for adoption and hypothetical use against enemy targets.

Performance race


The solutions found and tested formed the basis of new projects of full-fledged weapons for the armies. In addition, scientists were looking for new schemes and architectures of thermonuclear munitions, which would increase the energy yield, reduce the size of the charge, etc. All these processes led to the emergence and adoption of a number of products with certain features. Some of these charges successfully reached the point of being put into service, while others remained experimental.

The first munition of the new class, adopted for service, was the American free-fall bomb TX-16 / EC-16. It was based on developments on the Evie Mike theme, which is why it had a length of more than 7 m and weighed 19 tons with a power of 6-8 Mt. In 1954, only five such products were assembled, and only one B-36 bomber was converted for their use. At the first opportunity, the TX-16 was abandoned and replaced with more advanced weapons.


AN-602 in the museum. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

In turn, the USSR Air Force, after the necessary refinement of the design, adopted the existing RDS-6s bomb. Also, on the basis of this product, new warheads were created. So, in the autumn of 1955, three successive tests of the RDS-27 and RDS-37 bombs were carried out. The latter showed a capacity of 1,6 Mt and became the first Soviet weapon to cross the megaton line.

Over the next few years, the industry produced such weapons in small batches and gradually reduced the gap from a potential enemy in terms of quantitative and qualitative indicators. Various tests were also regularly carried out and new samples were created. Modified versions of the RDS-37 were developed with certain features, and work was also underway on completely new charges. They are known under the codes RDS-46, RDS-49, etc.

According to known data, in October 1958 the first test of a thermonuclear warhead designed for the world's first intercontinental ballistic missile took place. The ammunition for the R-7A rocket confirmed the estimated yield of 2,8 Mt, and then it was put into series.

The availability of all the necessary technologies made it possible to develop a number of different charges. They differed in size and power, and were also intended for different delivery vehicles - first of all, unguided aerial bombs and warheads for missiles of various types were created. The power of such products ranged from hundreds of kilotons to several megatons.


R-36M missile capable of carrying heavy warheads. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

In 1961, the most interesting domestic thermonuclear munition, the bomb "30" / "V" / AN-202, was developed and tested on October 602 at the Novaya Zemlya test site. The design capacity of this product was unique 50 Mt, the actual one was 58 Mt. At the same time, the design made it possible to increase the energy output to 100 Mt. The bomb "202" did not become a regular weapon of the Air Force, but it demonstrated the potential of the technologies used, and also showed a potential enemy how the USSR could respond to its threats.

In 1962, a new series of tests of warheads of unknown types, characterized by increased power, took place. Several products with a capacity of megatons were successively blown up, incl. two for 10 Mt, as well as charges for 19,1 and 20 Mt. In the latter cases, a monoblock warhead for the promising R-36 missile was tested.

New trends


Shortly after a number of remarkable and unique tests of thermonuclear weapons, several events occurred that influenced its further development. In addition, in the sixties, some new characteristic factors and trends were formed, the influence of which is still observed.

In January 1963, the Soviet leader N.S. Khrushchev visited the GDR. As a guest of honor, he spoke at the congress of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany. Then, for the first time, he officially spoke about the presence of super-powerful hydrogen weapons in the USSR. Not so long ago, the Caribbean crisis ended, and this statement did not go unnoticed. However, there were no negative events.


Loading rocket "Topol-M" in the mine. The product is equipped with a monoblock warhead with a capacity of hundreds of kilotons. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

On the contrary, the official recognition of the existence of thermonuclear weapons had a positive effect on international relations. Already in August of the same year, the USSR, the USA and Great Britain signed the Treaty on the Prohibition of Tests of Nuclear Weapons in the Atmosphere, in Space and Under Water. For several decades after that, until the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty came into being, testing of nuclear and thermonuclear products was carried out only in underground facilities, which limited their power.

The new restrictions ruled out setting new power records. In addition, new trends have emerged that have made it possible to abandon tens of megatons of ammunition. The new warheads were distinguished by great design perfection and reduced power. At the same time, they could fully solve all the proposed tasks.

There has also been progress in delivery vehicles. The guidance accuracy has increased, and split warheads have also appeared. All this made it possible to solve the assigned tasks without the use of warheads with a capacity of megatons - complex, expensive and not always expedient. Nevertheless, they were in no hurry to get rid of megaton-class products, and they remained in service.

Latest Results


For obvious reasons, accurate story domestic thermonuclear weapons in recent decades remains closed. Nevertheless, there is some information showing the main trends in its development, as well as illustrating the current state of this direction. In general, significant changes and evolutionary processes are noticeable.


Tu-160 bomber launches X-55/555 missile. If necessary, such a product carries a special warhead. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

According to known data, thermonuclear equipment is now used mainly in strategic nuclear forces as part of various missile systems. Special warheads are installed on land-based and sea-based ICBMs. Also, similar charges are placed on air-launched cruise missiles. In addition, there is a certain stockpile of tactical nuclear weapons.

As far as is known, the bulk of the strategic nuclear forces arsenals are warheads with a yield of no more than hundreds of kilotons. They have an optimal combination of dimensions, weight and power, and regular carriers provide the necessary range and accuracy. Some missile systems are still equipped with megaton-class warheads, but these are mostly obsolete products. However, according to some estimates, the new Sarmat missile can receive a high-power monoblock warhead.

Development results


One way or another, the current state of strategic and tactical thermonuclear weapons corresponds to the plans and requirements of the Ministry of Defense. It meets the tasks of strategic nuclear deterrence and must ensure the reliable defeat of the intended targets on the territory of a potential adversary. Such capabilities are regularly demonstrated during exercises and tests, however, since 1963, only delivery vehicles have actually undergone such tests - they carry practical warheads; the use of real ones is not provided.

It should be noted that the current state of affairs in the field of strategic deterrence and national security is based on the experience and developments of the past. The scientific and technological foundation for current developments and processes has been laid since the end of the forties and has been constantly developed and supplemented. As a result, our country has a unique and numerous security tool capable of responding to the most serious threats. And besides, there are all the technologies and competencies for further development.
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    1 February 2023 04: 52
    Well, according to tradition, thanks to the Soviet Union and Comrade Stalin for Russia's nuclear shield!
    1. +4
      1 February 2023 18: 40
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      Well, according to tradition, thanks to the Soviet Union and Comrade Stalin for Russia's nuclear shield!

      Why did you forget the project curator? wink
      He also oversaw jet and missile topics ... until he turned out to be
      ... the organizer of an anti-Soviet treacherous group of conspirators, whose criminal goal was to use the bodies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs both in the center and in the localities against the Party and its leadership, against the Government of the USSR, to put the Ministry of Internal Affairs over the Party and the Government to seize power, eliminate the Soviet system and restore capitalism
  2. -7
    1 February 2023 05: 03
    We spend a lot of money and resources on the development of "surplus" strategic weapons, the use of which is unlikely. Both from a military and especially from a political point of view.
    At the same time, we do not have non-nuclear missile weapons that could destroy the enemy's strategic facilities, such as bridges, dams, and the like. Although in general it could be done on the basis of developments for nuclear. By creating high-precision heavy hypersonic warheads.
    Well, let's not talk about other things. Having a Sarmat without having normal communications in the troops is like driving a Porsche without shoes.
    1. +3
      1 February 2023 05: 35
      Quote: ratcatcher
      We spend a lot of money and resources on the development of "surplus" strategic weapons, the use of which is unlikely. Both from a military and especially from a political point of view.

      Well, yes, well, yes, that’s probably why the outskirts are fighting against us, and not all of NATO along the entire border, right?
      1. +2
        1 February 2023 06: 49
        The question of what we really don't have... request Unfortunately ...
    2. -5
      1 February 2023 05: 38
      Quote: ratcatcher
      We spend a lot of money and resources on the development of "surplus" strategic weapons, the use of which is unlikely. Both from a military and especially from a political point of view.
      At the same time, we do not have non-nuclear missile weapons that could destroy the enemy's strategic facilities, such as bridges, dams, and the like. Although in general it could be done on the basis of developments for nuclear. By creating high-precision heavy hypersonic warheads.
      Well, let's not talk about other things. Having a Sarmat without having normal communications in the troops is like driving a Porsche without shoes.



      Well, you gave out venigret here! Non-nuclear means for the destruction of bridges were created a long time ago and of course there are now. It is also possible to destroy dams with existing types of ammunition. And yours ... "it could be done on the basis of developments for nuclear" is just the height of stupidity !! You just basically do not understand what you write.
      1. +4
        1 February 2023 07: 18
        Quote: 1976AG
        You just basically do not understand what you write.

        And you absolutely do not understand what you are answering! First, "vinaigrette", not "vinaigrette"! Secondly, many experts and "representatives" of the Ministry of Defense stated the difficulty of destroying railway bridges (pillars) due to the lack of high-explosive (concrete-piercing) charges of special power! For example. to destroy the support of the Soviet-built railway bridge, you need to "spend" more than one KR "Caliber"! And this weapon is expensive and in a certain deficit! In South Korea, they "found a way out" ...! They made a ballistic missile. capable of delivering warheads of 1 ton over a distance of 3000 km or 8-9 tons up to 300 km! And technologies similar to "nuclear missile" technologies were used for this!
        1. 0
          1 February 2023 10: 20
          this is a separate conversation and even a subject for an article, how we overslept another revolution in military affairs - the emergence of high-precision weapons capable of solving those tasks that previously had to be solved only by nuclear warheads. And if during the Cold War there was some kind of parity, then since the 1991 war in Iraq, the US has been tempted to break this parity due to its own superiority in precision weapons. Strictly on the condition that nuclear will not be used in response.
        2. -3
          1 February 2023 10: 26
          "Firstly, "vinaigrette", not "vinaigrette"!

          It’s not very convenient to write from the phone, okay, for Russian you are 4.

          "Secondly, many experts and "representatives" of the Ministry of Defense stated about the difficulty of destroying railway bridges (pillars) due to the lack of high-explosive (concrete-piercing) charges of special power"

          Is it just a matter of charge power? Deuce to you in military affairs.

          "It could be done on the basis of developments for nuclear. Through the creation of high-precision heavy hypersonic warheads."

          If you remember, one of the Kinzhal missiles destroyed a buried ammunition depot built in such a way as to withstand a nuclear strike. But there is also a more common means - the same Iskander missiles with a warhead for the destruction of especially durable objects. Although you apparently don’t know anything about these things .. you need Sarmat, otherwise it’s not impressive.

          "For example, in order to destroy a support of a Soviet-built railway bridge, you need to" spend "more than one KR" Caliber "! And these weapons are expensive and in a certain shortage! In South Korea, they" found a way out "...! They made a ballistic missile. capable of delivering Warheads of 1 ton at a distance of 3000 km or 8-9 tons up to 300 km! And for this, technologies similar to "nuclear missile" technologies were used!"

          That is, Caliber is an expensive product, but a ballistic missile with the characteristics you specified and using, as you say, "nuclear missile" (wow, how that sounds !!) technologies, this is your cheap product. And you want to say that everything is fine in your judgments?
      2. 0
        1 February 2023 12: 52
        And what is the comrade above wrong? Iskanders were originally conceived as tactical nuclear weapons, but are used in non-nuclear versions. Iskander, for a moment, along with the caliber, is the most high-precision tactical weapon in the Russian Federation.
        1. -1
          1 February 2023 18: 10
          Quote from Chief_Keef
          And what is the comrade above wrong? Iskanders were originally conceived as tactical nuclear weapons, but are used in non-nuclear versions. Iskander, for a moment, along with the caliber, is the most high-precision tactical weapon in the Russian Federation.



          Comrade, just like you, does not know the history of weapons, nor other features associated with it. Initially, the Iskander was conceived as a tactical missile system intended for export, therefore, in principle, it was not conceived in a nuclear version. But in general, this is not important, since any ammunition with a caliber of 152 mm or more can have a nuclear warhead.

          "Iskander, for a moment, along with the caliber, is the most high-precision tactical weapon in the Russian Federation."

          Where did I state otherwise? Before commenting, read the correspondence carefully and understand the essence of the issue.
    3. +2
      1 February 2023 19: 01
      Quote: ratcatcher
      Well, let's not talk about other things. Having a Sarmat without having normal communications in the troops is like driving a Porsche without shoes.

      The difference between a country's lack of nuclear weapons and its presence is clearly visible in the example of Milosevic, Hussein, Gaddafi - and Comrade Kim. wink
      If you forget about strategic weapons, then sooner or later the bearers of democracy will come to you in search of resources. And conventional forces will not be able to brush aside the coalition - no matter what the connection.

      In general, you are not looking for funds there. The problem with communications in the troops is not at all due to the lack of money for it, but because of the strange range of purchased communications equipment. Murza had a communication cycle in which he directly wrote that out of the entire "Azart" system, for some reason, the troops only had enough personal stations, and there were practically no base ones. And without them, a normal communication network, with nodes, horizontal and vertical connections and HF communications, cannot be built. Because the personal radios of the VHF range are only enough for 2,5 km, and each of them allocated for relaying is a minus a walkie-talkie on the front line.
      However, the answer "where are the base stations" was given by the developer in 2021. It turns out that until this year they were simply not purchased.
      Magically. Simply magical. It’s not even about a foreign kit that’s interesting, without which now practically no military thing will work at all, except for a bowler hat and a Kalashnikov assault rifle. It turns out that the supply of base stations of the Azart complex is supposedly already starting in the first half of 2021! But this happens AFTER SEVEN YEARS AFTER THE ADOPTION OF THE COMPLEX FOR WEAPONS. Deliveries are just beginning on the eve of the big war, when the stations will not really have time to get into the troops and no one will have time to master them.
      1. -2
        1 February 2023 19: 04
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Milosevic, Hussein, Gaddafi - and Comrade Kim

        Who did Kim attack? Whose genocide did you participate in? Whose planes blew up? Whom did you poison with chemical weapons?
        1. +1
          2 February 2023 10: 47
          Quote from cold wind
          Who did Kim attack? Whose genocide did you participate in? Whose planes blew up? Whom did you poison with chemical weapons?

          Are you serious? Or have they already forgotten how Kim was blamed for the sinking of the Cheonan corvette by the South Caucasus and the murder of his older brother, Kim Jong Nam, in Kuala Lumpur, committed in a socially dangerous way? Plus regular BR tests. Imagine that Gaddafi would start throwing OTPs somewhere in the Tyrrhenian Sea.
          And Kim gets away with it.
          Yes, about the chem. weapons - how was Saddam's WMD found in Iraq after the second war? wink
          1. +3
            2 February 2023 12: 06
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Imagine that Gaddafi would start throwing OTPs somewhere in the Tyrrhenian Sea

            Let me remind you that Gaddafi once took hostages when his son was arrested for debauchery, like in Switzerland. But nothing, everything was fine with him. Until it surfaced that he somehow incorrectly divided the money for Sarkozy's election campaign.

            Quote: Alexey RA
            And Kim gets away with it.

            Over the past 30 years, for the Americans to fly in and straighten their brains, one of several events must happen:
            1. You attack Kuwait.
            2. The President of the United States is accused of an extramarital cake in the workplace (although in relation to today this would be brazen flattery).
            3. A person with a deeply neglected oedipal complex becomes the president of the United States, and a shareholder of an oilfield service (not oil producing, this is important) company becomes vice president.
            4. You are funding the election of another corrupt French president, it pops up, and he attacks you to jump off this topic. Then he runs out of bombs and manages to negotiate with the Americans. It is the French president that is needed, because buying, say, the Germans obviously does not work - in Germany, all politicians are bought by the Russians and / or the Chinese, so they do not make any claims about this.

            So it looks like Kim is safe for now. Unless Eisenhower's grandson is elected, well, or MacArthur's son - he is very strange and he is 84 years old, which is what an American president needs these days.
      2. -1
        2 February 2023 09: 15
        Quote: Alexey RA
        If you score on strategic weapons, then sooner or later the carriers of democracy will come to you in search of resources

        Hm, unexpected.

        Previously, you wrote caricature nonsense only about Soviet-Finnish relations, it seems.
  3. -9
    1 February 2023 05: 41
    It's annoying when thermonuclear-boosted atomic bombs are called thermonuclear. There are essentially none.
    Understanding why this is so at the same time explains why there will be no thermonuclear energy.
    A neutron is released in a DT reaction. Which can simply be lost, or can be sent to the nucleus of uranium 238 and it will fall apart with the release of 19 times more energy. What the military practices is that the overwhelming energy release in a "thermonuclear" bomb comes from the decay of uranium. Therefore, the function of the thermonuclear part of the bomb is not to release the energy of the explosion, but to generate neutrons that will fall into the outer shell of uranium and release the main energy there.
    For a thermonuclear reactor, everything is the same - 95% of the energy in it "should" be generated due to the decay of uranium238. And we already know how to do this, and why to fence a tokomak nearby is no longer clear. In addition, he has other PRINCIPAL problems.
    And there are no alternatives to this at the current and future stage of scientific and technological progress.
    1. +5
      1 February 2023 06: 15
      Well, where were you before? And scientists, out of their stupidity, have been struggling with thermonuclear fusion for decades ....
      1. 0
        3 February 2023 11: 34
        Scientists are struggling with what they are interested in. And you see magic there only because of poor education.
    2. +3
      1 February 2023 07: 02
      Quote: NG inform
      What the military practices is that the overwhelming energy release in a "thermonuclear" bomb comes from the decay of uranium.

      And how do you explain, within the framework of your "theory", the power of the Tsar bomb of 50 megatons? Did you knock out neutrons from uranium?
      What about plutonium, but what about plutonium? How to be with him? laughing
      1. 0
        3 February 2023 11: 35
        You will not believe! Yes. That's right.
        Moreover, the Tsar Bomba is 100 megatons, not 50. And 50 was made for her simply by removing the outer shell of uranium and replacing it with lead. I repeat - 50 megatons simply due to the removed uranium.
        The illiterate are annoying.
    3. +2
      1 February 2023 13: 15
      For a thermonuclear reactor, everything is the same - 95% of the energy in it "should" be generated due to the decay of uranium238.

      Which in it, in this very reactor, is simply not there.
      https://news.cgtn.com/news/2023-01-07/China-obtains-new-super-I-Mode-on-artificial-sun-Tokamak-EAST--1gowYYUfLMs/index.html - ну и да, мирное использование термоядерной энергии таки будет, можете не сомневаться. На благо всему человечеству.
      1. 0
        3 February 2023 11: 37
        Well, yes, study poorly at school and the world will be full of miracles, magic and thermonuclear. Yeah.
        I love it when dropouts cancel math and are PROUD of it.
    4. 0
      1 February 2023 17: 26
      And why is the term thermonuclear bomb annoying. An atomic fuse is like a lighter, and the main release of energy comes from a thermonuclear unit.
      1. -1
        3 February 2023 11: 38
        The main emission is given by the fission reaction. And the thermonuclear unit simply improves the afterburning of uranium. I have marked the diagram. Such bombs have a thermonuclear component of 10-25% in the total exhaust.
  4. +5
    1 February 2023 05: 58
    Quote: Vladimir_2U
    Well, according to tradition, thanks to the Soviet Union and Comrade Stalin for Russia's nuclear shield!

    Comrade Beria oversaw the creation of this shield. smile
    Liberals get diarrhea from this.
    I am very glad that American inspectors have now been banned from accessing our nuclear secrets ... this should have been done a long time ago.
    1. +2
      1 February 2023 15: 16
      To be fair, G.M. Malenkov and N.A. Voznesensky.
  5. 0
    1 February 2023 06: 20
    We need to come up with something with the detection of drones, otherwise they reach strategic airfields. So they can quietly reach the missile silos ...
  6. -2
    1 February 2023 06: 30
    Quote from Constantin N.
    then they reach strategic airfields

    Constant observation from space ... you can’t think of anything better ... monitor any air and ground movement within a radius of 1000 km towards strategic objects and immediately take action if it poses a danger.
  7. +1
    1 February 2023 08: 33
    Addition to the superficial presentation of the author. The Americans, realizing the thermonuclear option, went stupid - they used liquid deuterium in their first thermonuclear device. It is clear that this cryogenic three-story object was not a weapon. And to use a chemical compound (lithium deuteride), as suggested by conscript sergeant Oleg Lavrentiev (Ginsburg and Sakharov stole the idea after a conversation with him), they did not have enough brains.
    1. +2
      1 February 2023 10: 26
      Thanks for the interesting detail! For the first time I hear about O. Lavrentiev. Immediately climbed to google and learned a lot of interesting things.
      1. +1
        1 February 2023 16: 50
        For the first time I hear about O. Lavrentiev. Immediately climbed to google and learned a lot of interesting things.
        Was a unique person. He died in the late 90s. He was thoroughly pushed back after the death of Beria, so to speak, the kagal recouped.
    2. +1
      1 February 2023 17: 19
      Well, it's kind of a fairy tale.
      Lithium deuteride was proposed immediately in 46 by von Neumann or Klaus Fuchs. They also have radiation implosion. Fuchs passed everything to us through intelligence. But the idea to charge the lead was on the surface, we are told that they thought of it themselves and all at once. All the same, the main difficulty turned out to be in the calculation of radiation, compression, so that the charge would not scatter. There were no supercomputers then, the promotion was on the principle of "shut up and count."
      Lavrentiev was brought by Beria, at the request of Kurchatov and Sakharov, to whom his studies were given for review. It can be seen how little bureaucracy was then.. Lavrentiev's letter reached, it was given to someone who understood this and was quickly included in the work.
      1. 0
        1 February 2023 19: 23
        in the 46th von Neumann or Klaus Fuchs. They also have radiation implosion.
        Especially about radiation implosion is interesting. And the very idea of ​​the atomic bomb was generally expressed in the late 30s. So what? There is a gap between the idea and implementation, especially since there is no guarantee that the idea will be realized. Implosion was generally made only in 1956. But building a cryogenic block for an explosion instead of using lithium deuteride - what's that? The Americans began to rest, they decided that they had pulled ahead forever, that's all.
  8. +4
    1 February 2023 08: 37
    A much more complete and interesting article could have been made on this topic! And this is a hack in a hurry for the sake of easy money. negative
    1. +7
      1 February 2023 10: 26
      give an example of an article from the so-called. "Ryabova Kirill", which is not a hack?
  9. 0
    1 February 2023 09: 04
    The time is approaching, in my opinion, when testing of nuclear weapons can be (usefully) resumed. Moreover, not just by undermining warheads, but by launching missile launchers and ballistic missiles at the test site.
    1. 0
      1 February 2023 12: 55
      Prohibited by international treaties
      1. +1
        1 February 2023 14: 41
        In the conditions of the growing flow of military aid against us, we can withdraw from the treaty.
    2. +1
      1 February 2023 14: 18
      Taking into account the accumulated base of design codes, there is no particular sense in full-scale tests of the final product. And the individual components are fully tested.
      1. 0
        1 February 2023 14: 43
        The accumulated base does not shine brightly, does not give a shock wave, does not show the flight range of the Kyrgyz Republic ...... and does not show the difference between 100kt and 1mt ... to the world community, in conditions of almost participation in the war against the Russian Federation.
        1. +1
          1 February 2023 17: 30
          Especially 1 mgt from 58 mgt in the air over Novaya Zemlya. So that the shock wave of the Angles swayed a little.
      2. 0
        2 February 2023 14: 07
        Interestingly, have complex tests of a missile with a nuclear warhead ever been carried out so that the missile takes off, reaches the test site and the nuclear warhead fires
        1. +2
          2 February 2023 15: 30
          I don’t know the KR, but the IRBM was definitely launched in the USSR.
          1. 0
            2 February 2023 17: 06
            Interesting to read where
            ...............
            ..
  10. 0
    1 February 2023 21: 05
    There are still 50 megatton bombs left in our barns!
    Wait for California, wait for New York, wait for Washington!
    1. 0
      1 February 2023 21: 51
      Thermonuclear allows you to very high return mGt / kg. The standard for today is 500kg. Accurate, far, powerful. The Americans began to underestimate the power even. And a bomb up to 6 tons can always be dropped from the Tu22M3
    2. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    2 February 2023 01: 43
    It is desirable that data be presented on the amount of harmful substances released into the atmosphere during nuclear weapons tests in the total amount that were mixed with air and carried by the wind rose throughout the planet Earth, and information was also provided analyzing the entire range of consequences of the impact on the human body throughout Eurasia, as well as North America and the Pacific Ocean equally with the entire planet Earth. I would especially like the announcement of the full spectrum (by analogy with the spectrum of radioactive radiation, how many "spectra" and types of radiation known to man and known consequences on a living organism) information regarding the mutating effect on the human body that led to irreversible changes in the natural course of events in the socio-political activity of man over time since 1945.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  12. 0
    2 February 2023 14: 35
    Quote: Bob Denkin
    There are still 50 megatton bombs left in our barns!
    Wait for California, wait for New York, wait for Washington!

    You got into the wrong chat, it's better for you to leave silently
  13. 0
    3 February 2023 13: 41
    Quote: ratcatcher
    At the same time, we do not have non-nuclear missile weapons that could destroy the enemy's strategic facilities, such as bridges, dams, and the like. Although in general it could be done on the basis of developments for nuclear. By creating high-precision heavy hypersonic warheads.


    We have everything, just the quantity is not enough and it is too expensive to spend on bridges.
    Hypersound is not needed here, it is all the more expensive. Rather, high-power planning bombs are needed for such purposes. They are, but too few.
  14. The comment was deleted.