The Chinese press writes about the high price that the United States will pay if it starts a war against China.

In China, they are reacting to statements by representatives of the American political authorities and the generals that Beijing allegedly "invades Taiwan" in 2027 or 2025. As stated in the United States, Washington will not stand aside and will support "Taiwan's right to free democratic development."

The Chinese authorities are asking the United States whether they recognize the status of Taiwan as part of China? In Washington, this question is always answered in the affirmative, in connection with which China asks a new question:

But if the United States supports the territorial integrity of the PRC, then how can one speak of supporting the separatist regime in Taiwan at the same time?

This question could be supplemented by the question of why, in this case, the United States did not support the will of the inhabitants of Crimea, Donbass, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions, who used the main democratic opportunity for self-expression - a referendum?

The answer is obvious: the US supports any regimes as long as they oppose Russia and China, and does not support what they themselves consider to be against their interests. No democracy, of course, stood here and there.

The Chinese edition of Hongqiu Shibao published an article stating that Washington itself provokes a war with China. At the same time, it is noted that the price of such a provocation, and even more so of a war, will be extremely high for the United States.

From the material:

The more Washington provokes a war against China, the more determined China will defend itself, the more interest in developing an independent innovative economy.

The Chinese author writes that if the United States believes that they can make money on the war against China, then they are mistaken:

American attempts to contain, suppress China will bring America much less than what it has to pay for such actions.

Comments

[Murmur 55]

Uh-huh, in the light of recent events, I believe it.

[Doccor18]

that if the United States believes that they can make money in the war against China, then they are mistaken

Not the United States, but world capital, it will definitely work. He still earns and will continue to do so... making good money on the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.

[Lech from Android.]

Quote: Murmur 55

Uh-huh, in the light of recent events, I believe it.

And simulate an approximate version of the US war with China.
The Chinese fleet is no longer inferior to the US Navy in terms of the number of pennants ... how the confrontation between the United States and China will end, which Russia will certainly help, is a moot point.

[ivan1979nkl]

for Russia, the involvement of China in the conflict would be very beneficial - the States would reduce pressure on Ukraine significantly, if not to zero

[Vladimir80]

Don’t dream, there are a lot of talkers in China, but there are almost no idiots, unlike the largest country ...

[Vladimir80]

No direct war with the Sha will be allowed, if there is something, then by the hands of the Yaps or the Vetnam or Taiwan itself ...

[NikolayDS]

And simulate an approximate version of the US war with China.

At the moment, there is no realistic scenario for the outbreak of war between China and the United States. All that we see is just intimidating the opponent before starting to bargain with him from more advantageous positions.

[Vladimir80]

Exactly! The Chinese and Americans are the first to be sold on the planet, and they will only butt heads over the terms of the deal ...

[Ed1970]

This is how the world of the future is slowly shaping up.
Once the United States took out technology and production, now China is able to create combat robots and anything. Regardless of others. Full cycle of development and production. In a situation where other nations will shed the blood of their sons, China will churn out robots like mobile phones are churning out now. And no one can stop them in this (as in December 2022 TSMC refused to ship Elbrus to Russia https://www.ixbt.com/news/2022/12/19/vot-tak-nomer-v-mincifry-rasskazali-chto- zapadnye-kompanii-otkazalis-postavljat-rossijskie-processory-bajkal-i-jelbrus.html ).
Wars are primarily a confrontation between science, weapons, well-thought-out tactics, and these are mathematicians, physicists ... Even Suvorov once remarked: "not by numbers, but by skill." Even after 300 years, not all of us get it.
And China has more than enough skill, so the US will one day have to move.
And Russia? It seems that little will change in the country in the 90s, which betrayed its future "for the sake of jeans and chewing gum" and sold timber, oil, gas. Instead of dollars, there will be yuan, and our descendants will one day not see forests. But they will be. Probably....

[rotmistr60]

Washington will not stand aside and support "Taiwan's right to free democratic development."

How can Washington stay away when Taiwan's accession to mainland China will strengthen it not only politically, but also technologically. And this is perceived by the United States as a threat to their national security (they perceive everything that does not fit into their plans). What is characteristic of the PRC is not talking about the forceful (military) seizure of Taiwan, Taiwan itself, supported by the United States and the Western media, is ringing about this. So far, China is quietly moving towards its goal with periodic demonstrations of strength, despite the US-Taiwanese provocations with the arrival of all sorts of Pelosi, ships in the South China Sea ... And in this situation, it remains to wish China success.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: rotmistr60

How can Washington stay away when Taiwan's accession to mainland China will strengthen it not only politically, but also technologically.

The Chinese authorities are asking the United States whether they recognize the status of Taiwan as part of China? In Washington, this question is always answered in the affirmative.

Something tells me that the Americans are not just crossing their fingers behind their backs, but braiding them into a "pigtail" when they talk about "a united China."

It sounds funny, of course, but it is Taiwan that considers itself the "real China" and legally this "big China" needs to be "attached" to Taiwan.
Nonsense, of course, but on paper it is. So the Americans are talking about a "united China" without going into details.
Purely American. Hypocritical and duplicitous.

[NikolayDS]

Quote: Zoldat_A

It sounds funny, of course, but Taiwan considers itself "real China"

If the Bolsheviks had not kicked out Baron Wrangel from the Crimea, we might have also had the same.
Taiwan considers the legitimate government of Chiang Kai-shek, and Mao Zedong - the usurper, and China - on the contrary. The question is purely legal.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: NikolayDS

If the Bolsheviks had not kicked out Baron Wrangel from the Crimea, we might have also had the same.

So the "Supreme Ruler" of Russia was also in Omsk ...

Quote: NikolayDS

Taiwan considers the legitimate government of Chiang Kai-shek, and Mao Zedong - the usurper, and China - on the contrary. The question is purely legal.

Arguing with lawyers will drive you crazy. I don't even try to get into it. I have a head of the legal department who has been working with our family for almost thirty years - now he knows these subtleties. He, probably, is interested in such legal incidents to understand.

And to us, mere mortals, it sounds wild that one and a half percent of the population living on 3,5% of the territory considers the remaining 98,5% of the population to be separatists.
And who is the "correct" one - Chiang Kai-shek or Mao Zedong ... Let Comrade Xi figure it out. I think he can.

[Denis812]

The Americans are trying to repeat the alignment of the Second World War.
The idea is generally not bad from their point of view. US losses were acceptable. And as a result of the war, the United States gained strong control over half the world + took the lead in the economy.
The components are the same - a war in Europe to reduce its overall economic potential, prevent the integration of the Russian Federation with Germany and increase the vassal dependence of the EU on the United States.
And the second is the war in the East. Only now in place of Japan - China.

Of course, the motivation of the Russian Federation and China is completely different from the motivation of Germany and Japan of those years, but the United States does not care about motivation, the main thing is that the actions of China and the Russian Federation are contrary to the interests of the United States. The rest doesn't matter to them.
If the Russian Federation gouges half of Europe, but at the same time it gets bogged down in ruins, and in the East China breaks its teeth on Taiwan, destroying both it and Japan along the way, then in general the United States will secure its power over the world for another half a century, as it will again become the only power on whose territory there was no war.
And the United States can afford to lose half a million people. It will be easier to explain to ordinary Americans why it is necessary to reduce benefits and pour more dough into the military-industrial complex and corporations.

Americans do not take into account only one thing. It's not the 40s anymore. You won't be able to sit behind a big puddle. Weapons, to put it mildly, are different. Although if they know for sure that the Russian Federation and China will not use nuclear weapons, then if I were the Americans, I would do exactly what they are doing now.

[Arifon]

Quote: Denis812

Although if they know for sure that the Russian Federation and China will not use nuclear weapons, then if I were the Americans, I would do exactly what they are doing now.

It turns out that we have only one way out to save the country - to show "Kuzkin's Mother" and as soon as possible?

[igorbrsv]

There is no more exit. If you show it - the third world war, if you don’t show it - too, but a little later

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Denis812

If the Russian Federation gouges half of Europe, but at the same time it gets bogged down in ruins, and in the East China breaks its teeth on Taiwan, destroying both it and Japan along the way, then in general the United States will secure its power over the world for another half a century, as it will again become the only power on whose territory there was no war.

What will happen?
I mean to be "the only power on whose territory there was no war." Delivery vehicles will not be TB-1 in the Last War. Yes, and it will not be the FAB-500 that will fly.

[Arifon]

In what situation could the States give Taipei to China, make such an expensive "present" to a potential adversary? Only in one case - if China leaked its ally, Russia.
But the Chinese will not do this, because they understand that they will be the next in the confrontation - and they will get punched in the face and then take away the gift from them ... Remember, about Malchish-Plokhish, how bourgeois jam came out sideways from him?)
All this means that there is no peaceful, diplomatic solution to this territorial issue for China. And, if he wants to solve this issue, then time is now working against China.
But the question is, why are the Americans so actively pushing China to war now? Want to solve everything in one fell swoop? But will their pants not burst, on two fronts, then? Unclear...

[ivan1979nkl]

the collapse / destruction of China is the main goal of the United States, because. China is a powerful potential threat. Russia is a real, current threat that the states expect to shake from the inside with external strikes

[NikolayDS]

Quote from Arifon

that there is no peaceful, diplomatic solution to this territorial issue for China.

It even exists ... That's why China is slow.
The only reason why China has not yet sent troops to Taiwan is because "it is better to sit on the river bank and wait for the corpse of your enemy to float by." When they needed it, they sent troops to Tibet and did not ask anyone. In Taiwan, pro-Chinese sentiment is much stronger than pro-Russian sentiment in Ukraine. So it's a 50/50 situation right now.

[ivselim]

Fashington is trying to move the production of microchips to itself, so that it would not fall into the hands of the Chinese. It's not a fast process. In this regard, and the manifestation of support for Taiwan. But, I think, they won’t be able to take everything clean and, accordingly, the dates for the start of the war appear in 25-27 years, when there will be some minimum of this very production.

[Vladimir80]

If they transfer all the production of chips to themselves, then they will not really need Taiwan. With a gradual decrease in funding for the pro-American elites in Taiwan and the strengthening of the pro-Chinese elites, Taiwan itself will ask for a home harbor in 20 years

[Romanenko]

I think that in any case, a direct clash between China and the United States is unlikely, these guys will act by proxy, as is already seen in the dill theater of operations, yes, they will supply weapons, set mercenaries from everywhere, bring up new military blocs and bases closer, organize logistics and ... And what's not obvious. They are actively warming up the Taiwan conflict, skirmishes with India are organized practically on a turnkey basis, what is left there? Mercenaries from Thailand and South Korea - so at the expense of "RAS", the Japs have practically nowhere to go, they will say and go where they are told, using the example of Shinzo Abe, they very intelligibly explained what happens to those who want to be friends with Russia (read with China too).
I think that the concept of international friendship will soon take on a new meaning, this is when progressive humanity, having gathered together, goes to beat the striped backs.

[opuonmed]

the price will be high current when nuclear weapons are used!