Why Ukraine receives military assistance in a dosed manner

72
Why Ukraine receives military assistance in a dosed manner

For a long time, the Ukrainians, and indeed we, cannot calm down after the decision of the West to transfer heavy tanks and other offensive equipment to Kyiv. For Ukraine, these are the next Bayraktars or Javelins. another miracle-weaponwhich will immediately turn the course of the war on its head. The Russians will be defeated, and Russia will fall apart from internal conflict or even civil war.

For us, such deliveries are just additional targets that will be destroyed by our artillery and VKS. Those who can think logically may not even read the performance characteristics and combat characteristics of these machines. It is enough to know the weakness inherent in any tank.



Reservation, no matter how hard the designers try, cannot be the same everywhere. To reduce the weight and design features of the vehicle, the top of the tank is armored much worse than in other places. Most of the additional protection systems were created specifically for the defense of the machine from above.

And now watch any video taken from the UAV, where you can see the destruction of any opornik or DRG of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. But, look from a different angle. Not the work of the infantry or a particular gun, but the way gunners work. Alas, but, judging by the funnels, they do not invent anything new.

A long-thought-out tactic of the fire shaft. True, with some adjustments. During the Great Patriotic War, gunners could not afford to spend so many shells in a normal battle. Today, thanks to the workers and engineers of the defense industry, not often, but we can afford it.

That is, enemy tanks in any case, if they are not destroyed, they will be damaged, with a high probability - for sure. And given the huge problems with operation, repair, refueling, supply, even a slight damage turns a tank, especially American vehicles, into a pile of useless metal.

"The supply of tanks is a de facto declaration of war"...


Today, thanks to the huge information opportunities, the war largely depends on journalists and their "younger brothers" bloggers. Let me remind you of the "red lines", which, at the suggestion of the media, have become widely used by politicians. “Now, if you…, then we…” But this very “if” happens, and ... nothing happens in response.

We forgot history wars? The supply of weapons and even mercenaries and instructors never meant a declaration of war. The US and Europe have always done this. Yes, and the USSR, China and Russia too. And no one said that this was a declaration of war, participation in the war.

Even today, somewhere in Africa or Asia, we see how different sides use our, Chinese or Western weapons in civil wars. Exactly the same situation with instructors and mercenaries. The last ones are especially interesting. PMCs are fought by "people of the world", fighters representing many countries and peoples. At the same time, no one talks about the participation of different states in the war.

I expected that somewhere, in serious publications, another “red line” would appear in connection with the supply of tanks. But, to my "deep satisfaction", the era of "red lines" has passed. Otherwise, we would again have to reproach our government, the president, Minister Shoigu for not keeping our promise and not starting a world war.

Does anyone doubt that the issue of deliveries of aircraft and helicopters to Ukraine will be considered and positively resolved in the near future? I think there are few such optimists left. And someone doubts that foreigners, not Ukrainians, will sit in the cockpits of these aircraft? Again the "red line"?

We will again be told about the brilliant Ukrainian pilots, as now about the brilliant tankers who, in two or three months, master combat aircraft so much that they are able to fight with pilots or tankers who have been working on their machines for not months, but years. It is possible to “train” a fighter to use serious weapons in a couple of months, but whether this fighter is capable of fighting with such weapons is a big question.

Why is NATO "driving the wave"?


The story about the supply of tanks to Ukraine began to be untwisted by the Ukrainian and Western press for a long time. We "picked up" this topic much later. Just by tradition, as was the case with Turkish UAVs or American ATGMs, howitzers, and MLRS. The West's calculation was simple. Intimidate enemy soldiers and officers. Alas, at first we really experienced problems with this.

How many arms deliveries have already been made by NATO to Kyiv? How does it usually happen? No pump, running. We met at the military base. Listened to the requests of the APU. We discussed the possibilities and options for deliveries and issued a conclusion listing the weapons that will be delivered. Moreover, I have already written about this more than once, in many respects this decision is made after the fact. Weapons are already on the way to Ukraine or have already been delivered to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

By the way, in the case of tanks and other systems discussed in Ramstein, this scheme also works. German tanks, which were supposed to be delivered at the air base, were seen on the same day loaded onto platforms in Holland. And one of the armored vehicles, the supply of which was also discussed in Ramstein, was already shown by our military correspondents burned.

But rather quickly, the Russian army learned to work against all these advertised systems. It turned out that in many ways the West simply lied to the world about its own power, about its "super-efficient" weapons. Yes, according to some indicators, Western weapons are superior to ours, but in some respects they are inferior. And superiority is not critical at all. You can destroy these systems.

Today, Russian tankers quite often declare that they are waiting for these very Western tanks on the front line:

"Watch them burn"...

This is not the bravado of beardless youths. This is a completely conscious desire of warriors who have gone through more than one battle. Those who were blown up by mines, burned in wrecked cars, fought alone with several opponents.

I am sure that commanders are already conducting classes to study German and American tanks. Tank commanders and gunners are well aware of the strengths and weaknesses of these vehicles. Commanders of artillery units, UAV operators, VKS pilots and even ordinary grenade launchers in motorized rifle and airborne units do exactly the same.

We are waiting…

The fact that Ukraine needed tanks was already clear when the decision was made to train three corps of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at Western military bases. I also wrote about it. The 80-90 thousand people who will be trained in the West need weapons, including heavy ones. How they need and aviation.

The remnants of Soviet weapons that remained in the Eastern European countries will be delivered to brigades already battered at the front, and new corps, due to the lack of the required amount of Soviet weapons, must be armed with what has been decommissioned or stored in arsenals. That is, NATO junk.

Simply put, NATO continues the campaign to dispose of its obsolete weapons at the expense of Ukraine.

Will nuclear weapons be used?


Probably the most important question that I want to get an answer to is the question of the use of nuclear weapons in any of its variants. Most readers are educated enough people to understand how dangerous this weapon is, not so much at the time of use, but in the future. Losses at the time of its application are much less than they will become in the future.

Today we read a lot of materials about who and when can use nuclear weapons. From the American side, we are accused of this, from our side, respectively, the United States and NATO will be to blame. That is, our opponents will definitely use such weapons. For the Americans, it's us, for us, it's the Americans. Paradox?

In fact, the Americans are well aware that as long as they stand aloof from the conflict, I wrote about this at the beginning of the material, there is no need to be afraid of the use of our nuclear weapons. Supplies? So what? There is no direct participation in the war! Formally, they are right. The Pentagon is very careful to ensure that Russia does not have evidence of the direct participation of the American army in the conflict.

In order to understand US foreign policy at least at a primitive level, it is necessary to understand the mentality of the American political elite. Over the years of the existence of the two-party system, the ruling parties have become a kind of corporation. A sort of political monopoly concerns that pursue the policy that is necessary to maximize the profits of the corporation.

Hence the differences in the parties' approaches to foreign policy. The periods of President Trump and President Biden are very indicative in this respect. Yes, and today's statements by Trump fundamentally contradict Biden's statements. Trump speaks directly about the logic of supplying the same nuclear weapons in the future.

The corporate thinking of American politicians is expressed in the steps taken by the United States in foreign policy. Very often in our media the question is asked why American politicians do not understand simple things. Why does the USA often play "on the verge of a foul"?

Consider Washington's actions over the past year.

This is the usual way of dealing with competitors in business. Biden and his team understand everything perfectly. But, according to the tactics of competitive struggle, they are constantly probing the capabilities of the competitor and his willingness to respond to trial actions. Step forward and wait for an answer. No answer - next step.

The next step is always more serious than the previous one. Remember the first arms deliveries? Soviet weapons from the arsenals of the occupied countries. We are silent. Then European analogues of American small arms and small arms of European countries. We are silent. Further artillery systems and MLRS. We are silent again. And here are the tanks...

Will we answer? Will we strike at European bases or points of concentration of military assistance in countries bordering Ukraine? I doubt it very much. Our politicians are also well aware of what this will lead to. A global war will not lead to anything good. Even victory in such a war leads to huge losses in the economy in the long run.

Both we and the Americans will demonstrate our capabilities, but no one will "press the red button" without real danger to the country. We need to win in Ukraine. Win convincingly.

"Russia must disappear"


Continuing the theme of corporate thinking of American politicians, we have to destroy another myth that is very popular in Ukraine. The myth that Americans sleep and see Russia, consisting of small states that do not mean anything in international politics.

Yes, there is such a point of view in the USA. Moreover, the most notorious American politicians broadcast it quite often in their speeches. This is a public game. First of all, European and Ukrainian. If you want to hear it, listen. For the US corporation, this is not quite the desired outcome of the confrontation. There is a much better option.

What is the collapse of a rival corporation in terms of business? Victory? To some extent. But these are also problems associated with the costs of creating those industries that existed with a competitor, but were destroyed when he disappeared. It will be much more effective to absorb a competitor, to make him work for himself, using existing capacities!

From the point of view of the Americans, the ideal situation was created in the 90s. Russia with a fully controlled economy, weak militarily, politically weak-willed. Remember how fat then foreign companies. So far, they have not been completely eradicated. To this day, a huge part of the profits of our enterprises is flowing abroad.

So it is very doubtful that the US wants the collapse of our country. Weak and dependent Russia - yes. There are no pieces in which it will still be necessary to invest. And as a country that has the ability to mobilize a huge land army in the event of an aggravation of relations between the US and China, Russia is also interesting.

I think it is now clear why weapons are being handed over to Ukraine in strict doses. Exactly enough to make it impossible to defeat Kyiv, but it was also difficult to end the war. The fate of Ukraine is no longer interesting to the West.

The main task is to wear down Russia.

The result?


Naturally, the question of our future arises. What should we be afraid of and how should we react to the actions of opponents?

I think the question should be answered directly, without options.

We have nothing to fear!

Yes, there will be losses, there will be a danger of attacks on our cities and villages. There will be sanctions and everything else. Just don't be afraid anymore. It's too late to be afraid. There is no point in being afraid. What happened, happened. It is necessary to understand this. Understand and prepare countermeasures against Western intrigues.

After the Armed Forces of Ukraine receive completely ready corps, and these are twelve brigades in the corps and ten separate brigades in the composition of the IEDs, the Ukrainian army will become approximately equal in combat potential with the Russian one. She will not be able to attack, but she will be able to defend herself more effectively. This means that the fighting will last longer.

Many write to me that Ukraine and Europe are tired of the war. Let me disagree with this.

Society, any society, quickly adapts to wartime conditions. Have you noticed how interest in the events in Ukraine is disappearing in our society? How calmly do people talk about the war in Ukraine and Europe?

The war in Ukraine has become commonplace for the world today...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    February 2 2023
    The war in Ukraine has become commonplace for the world today...
    As according to Pushkin:
    "That year the autumn weather
    It was a long time in the yard,
    Winters waited, nature waited.
    Snow fell only in January "(c)
    1. -5
      February 2 2023
      The era of "red lines" is over.
      MLRS, tanks, then aviation, and nuclear weapons will reach! There are no lines!
      1. +15
        February 2 2023
        There are no lines!
        And they were? These very lines? The entry of the Baltic States into NATO, back in the early 2000s, how is that? Did you cross the line or not? Or was there no red line? Forgot to spend?
        1. 0
          February 2 2023
          Quote: parusnik
          And they were? These very lines?

          Alexey hi In any case, they declared .... And where they were drawn and when .... We don’t know this!
      2. +8
        February 2 2023
        Many write to me that Ukraine and Europe are tired of the war.

        In Germany, according to polls, the votes for the supply of Leopards were divided equally. But in general, about 70% of German friends are in favor of continuing to provide assistance to the fraternal people.

        Over the past month, after stormy talks about deliveries, Leopard maker Rheinmetall rose by 22%, and by 148% in a year, from 80 euros per share to 230.

        US arms sales are up nearly 50% in 2022.

        Total cost of intergovernmental arms sales through the State Department was $51,9 billion in fiscal year 2022, for the 12 month period ending September 30, 2022, which is 49,1% more than $34,8 billion in the previous fiscal year.

        So-called direct commercial sales, or sales of weapons and military equipment to foreign governments by U.S. defense contractors, also rose in fiscal 2022. up 48,6% to $153,7 billion compared to $103,4 billion in fiscal 2021.

        Source: http://www.china.org.cn/world/Off_the_Wire/2023-01/28/content_85075841.htm
        1. +4
          February 2 2023
          1. Why Ukraine receives military assistance in a dosed manner - because that the goal of the West is to drag out hostilities in Ukraine as long as possible. Make it a second Afghanistan or Vietnam, whatever you want.
          2. Termination of the CBO even if the goals are not achieved will not be the defeat of Russia, and even more so the death of Russia in its current form. Stop howling about it in the swamps. And to blow into the tune of Western political technologists.
          3. Use nuclear weapons banned China and common sense. Enough to disperse this topic, nuclear contamination in central Russia is not the goal of the NWO.
          4.
          Naturally, the question of our future arises.

          This question was even before Covid and NWO. And there was no common development plan for everyone, no Russian dream. So it is necessary to consider the issue of the future without reference to the NWO.
          1. -1
            February 2 2023
            Quote: Civil
            The termination of the NMD, even if the goals are not achieved, will not be the defeat of Russia, and even more so the death of Russia in its current form


            Quote: Civil
            Nuclear weapons have been banned by China and common sense.


            amused another provocateur with theses from the State Department manual.

            The old State Department training manual before the start of the SVO has already become irrelevant along with its theses

            ABM facilities in Europe are not against Russia, but against Iran

            NATO and its expansion does not pose a threat to Russia

            Russia does not need an army and an increase in defense spending because nothing threatens it


            Quote: Civil
            So it is necessary to consider the issue of the future without reference to the NWO.


            well, consider for yourself, and the whole world and the West consider the war in Ukraine and its outcome as a struggle for a new world order. Whoever wins will have that same future with sovereignty and the right to a better life. And the loser is doomed only to the dismemberment of the state, extinction and poverty.
            1. 0
              February 2 2023
              .And the loser is doomed only to the dismemberment of the state, extinction and poverty.

              1. Nuclear powers don't lose wars.
              2. It is impossible to lose/win CBO, but you can only bet, but not all goals have been achieved yet.
              3. Why not on the front line? They got noisy couch turbo-patriots with their "If Artemovsk is not liberated, then Russia will fall apart and die."
              Russia will not die out, will not fall apart as it was before the NWO, during and after.
              1. -2
                February 7 2023
                1. Nuclear powers don't lose wars.


                And the USSR?
          2. -1
            February 3 2023
            Nuclear weapons have been banned by China and common sense. Enough to disperse this topic, nuclear contamination in central Russia is not the goal of the NWO.


            With what fright does China tell us to use nuclear weapons or not? Economic blackmail? Is it beneficial for China? As soon as China imposes sanctions, we will not remain in debt for raw materials, and immediately a slap in the face will fly from across the ocean, there would still be such a gift and a chance to weaken China. In order to stop the insolent Yankees and other jackals, the degree of response needs to be increased and not swallowed and parried, so we won’t achieve anything, but thermonuclear (the level of infection is several times less than from nuclear and the effect is higher) weapons at the border of 404 and psheks are even nothing, Yes, this will open up other problems, but it will finish the SVO, we try a lot about the red lines, and the Nazis didn’t want to give a damn about them, so when they get the cabbage soup, then they will only calm down.
        2. +6
          February 2 2023
          Quote: dorz
          Leopard maker Rheinmetall rose by 22%, and by 148% in a year, from 80 euros per share to 230.

          You see, Rheinmetall doesn't make Leopard tanks.
          Quote: dorz
          up 48,6% to $153,7 billion from $103,4 billion in fiscal 2021.

          Yes, they caused a stir with their demilitarization. Is it surprising?
        3. +7
          February 3 2023
          Quote: dorz
          In Germany, according to polls, the votes for the supply of Leopards were divided equally.

      3. +1
        February 2 2023
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        The era of "red lines" is over.
        MLRS, tanks, then aviation, so nuclear weapons will come!

        The wrong goals for all parties will not reach, and we are still raking up the consequences of Chernobyl. A huge territory is not suitable for life.
        The goals of the United States are the destruction of Europe as the main competitor, and the complete subordination of the Europeans to their will without reservation. And the taming of the obstinate Russia and submission to his will.
        The first point has been completed now attempts to implement the second. Ideally, for the United States, this is an armed conflict between Russia and China. They really want to implement the plan that they implemented in relation to Japan for China, but without complaisant satellites along the perimeter of China, this is not possible.
        1. 0
          February 7 2023
          Quote: insafufa
          And the taming of the obstinate Russia and submission to his will.

          It is unlikely. They achieved this without a war; The war was planned by the Ukrainians somewhere from the zero years, at first they were morally trained, fattened, they were allowed to wear shorts with lace, and from the 11th year the war was already inevitable, they began to prepare in earnest. For what? Judging by the principles of life of the Anglo-Saxon colonialists, it’s just stupid new markets, profit in everything. The main beneficiary of the war is the island of Britain, the Yankees, as always, they only benefit, if tomorrow the Yankees will be profitable without Britain, they will join us as allies and wash the island together. In short, the Yankees created the conditions, then they shaved, but the tools are Ukrainians, Ukrainians that no one needs, who are just a bargaining chip in lacy shorts.
    2. 0
      February 3 2023
      As according to Pushkin:
      "That year the autumn weather
      It was a long time in the yard,
      Winters waited, nature waited.
      Snow fell only in January "(c)
      It seems Palmerston said: "How difficult it is to live when no one is at war with Russia."
  2. +5
    February 2 2023
    Everything can be burned, there is no dispute, only the last, from the declared deliveries, will complicate our life, both in fulfilling the plans of the NWO, and will also increase losses!
    1. 0
      February 2 2023
      Quote: Vladimir61
      only the last, from the declared deliveries, will complicate our life, both in fulfilling the NWO plans, and will also increase losses!

      Russia must be returned to the state of the 90s of the last century. To do this, it must be weakened as much as possible in all areas.
      1. +18
        February 2 2023
        Russia must be returned to the state of the 90s of the last century. To do this, it must be weakened as much as possible in all areas.

        In order to return the Russian Federation to the 90s, you must first get out of the 90s ...

        Today, Russian tankers quite often declare that they are waiting for these very Western tanks on the front line:

        "Watch them burn"...

        This is not the bravado of beardless youths. This is a completely conscious desire of warriors who have gone through more than one battle.

        Although after such opuses in the inadequacy of the author, there was no doubt
        1. +11
          February 2 2023
          Quote: spektr9
          Although after such opuses in the inadequacy of the author, there was no doubt

          Politruk he is a political instructor. True, sofa.
        2. +4
          February 2 2023
          Quote: spektr9
          Although after such opuses in the inadequacy of the author, there was no doubt

          I have not had them since the very first acquaintance with the opuses of this author.
          However, it is encouraging that Mr. Staver's jingoistic frenzy is gradually fading away, and the person is gradually beginning to think sensibly.
          The only pity is that he is not able to completely destroy the vocation of a political instructor in himself.
          What is this phrase worth: "It turned out that in many ways the West simply lied to the world about its own power, about its" super-efficient "weapons"!
          Mr Staver! It is better to keep silent about lies. There are other countries ahead of the whole planet. In which from every iron and in every resource of the Network every other day they boasted about the next wunderwaffles having no analogues in the world.
          I regularly look through foreign media, including military ones. I have never seen such bragging and PR.
      2. +7
        February 2 2023
        Russia must be returned to the state of the 90s of the last century.
        Since the 21st century began to intensify? The question is for what? We began to independently produce high-tech products in mass quantities? Oh, yes, they intensified due to the screwdriver assembly of Mercs, Fords and other things and the last ..
        From the point of view of the Americans, the ideal situation was created in the 90s. Russia with a fully controlled economy, weak militarily, politically weak-willed.
        And who created it? Not the person to whom the center of his name was reclaimed? Not the one who had February 1, had a birthday, and he and the deputy for the Security Service, as well as a certain Chubais, who is not called a traitor, were wreaths sent to the grave?
      3. +5
        February 2 2023
        oooh Alexander I think this is the 1st time you answered. I thought Staver is a team of authors, but it exists)) ... your style is fundamentally annoying if you read comments ... or is it for a provocation? about Kherson, about 6 in the morning, the war will end in less than a year ... if you are being ignored more and more and you don’t get more than 50 comments, then you can write about the urgent ...
  3. +5
    February 2 2023
    After the Armed Forces of Ukraine receive completely ready corps, and these are twelve brigades in the corps and ten separate brigades in the composition of the IEDs, the Ukrainian army will become approximately equal in combat potential with the Russian one. She can't step, but will be able to defend more effectively.

    A very strange opinion. IMHO, such units are created exclusively for the offensive. To the territory of Russia from the Kharkiv region or to the territory of Russia towards the Crimea, does not matter. It is important that it is for the offensive.

    And this offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, even if it fails, will help to wear down and weaken Russia even more. And in case of luck, albeit partial ...

    In my opinion, "Mr." Staver, as he often does, just sews misinformation for us, calming and chattering.
  4. +6
    February 2 2023
    The debate about whether this is a war or not a war has not subsided to this day. And from different platforms it rushes - "To Washington" and "Bomb Germany." True, you won’t hear this from the military themselves. Nothing in the world has changed since the last century. In 1914, the liberal newspapers dreamed of the capture of Berlin on New Year's Eve. But the military besieged them, advised them to prepare hospitals for 200 thousand wounded. Sometimes there is a fan taste from patriotic statements. But I am more concerned about the mood in our society. Yes, war is a cruel thing.
    1. +5
      February 2 2023
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      But the military besieged them, advised them to prepare hospitals for 200 thousand wounded


      The trouble is that now such measures are invisible. Back in the spring, it was necessary to stop all these phantom "programs" and "projects" from which the army of officials is fed: roads, "new" textbooks, "patriotic complexes" and other "Potemkin modernization". What is the point of all this nonsense if Russia loses the war? We need hundreds of "launches" every day, equipment, large-scale evacuation of people from the 120 km zone, a curfew, etc. Measures in the spirit of World War II are simply ignored.
      Obviously, the Kremlin is simply afraid to affect the interests of bureaucrats, shareholders of corporations and the electorate. So there is a hopeless operation in the spirit of the 40th army.
      1. +1
        February 2 2023
        Quote: samarin1969
        ..... The trouble is that now there are no such measures. Back in the spring, it was necessary to stop all these phantom "programs" and "projects" from which the army of officials feeds: roads, "new schoolbooks", "patriotic complexes" ....

        New monuments especially infuriate me. In my city. What is not a month, then a monument. Not only that, or terrible, or with errors in the inscription. And if the author has several million am am then the whole project can reach up to 40 million. And events are constantly commemorating the birthdays of dead kings, films also ....
  5. +7
    February 2 2023
    At the beginning of the 20th century, it was believed that due to the interweaving of international business interests, a major war was not possible.

    Now we see in practice that all kinds of wars are possible, but they take place against the backdrop of trade exchanges, various supplies, hidden agreements, ... ..

    Wars have become more like criminal showdowns at the level of international business.

    It is possible to rob the enemy even without war at all, by buying shares in his enterprises and introducing your managers to the boards of directors. War has become one of the elements of the economic struggle. For 30 years, we have been robbed so that the money is enough for 10 SVO.
    1. +2
      February 2 2023
      Quote: ivan2022
      For 30 years, we have been robbed so that the money is enough for 10 SVO.

      good And how many more resources in Russia did our ancestors save with their blood?!
      Here comes the pumping in the world media: "rob the loot" of the Empire and the dehumanization of the peoples of Russia. For such a grand jackpot, not only Poles and Romanians, but also a well-fed "Golden Billion" will be thrown to the front.
    2. +3
      February 2 2023
      Wars have become more like criminal showdowns at the level of international business.
      They are what they are..
  6. +1
    February 2 2023
    Another miracle weapon that will immediately turn the course of the war upside down. Russians will be defeated
    In this context, Duda's statement about Zelensky's advice is noteworthy: "Vladimir, after Russia is defeated and crawls on his knees to sign the surrender, you must ..." and then la, la, poplars. Therefore, each appearance of new weapons in Ukraine causes some euphoria from the "imminent victory", while others hope for it. And the nomenclature of Western weapons, of course, will constantly change in the direction of increasing their supply and more modern characteristics of these weapons.
  7. -5
    February 2 2023
    It's amazing that the cunning hohli are still running around with the idea of ​​a "holy war for freedom". 21st century in the yard. The concept of War has lost its centuries-old holiness. Only business. And nothing personal and sacred.
  8. -4
    February 2 2023
    An excellent article, because these puten-possessors lured it to VO!
    Only one
    Let me disagree with this.
    Society, any society, quickly adapts to wartime conditions.

    Here is the actual error. They do not have wartime, and this is one of the "tails" of Western propaganda. It was planned in the best style of the West, by the way, Poroshenko voiced this training manual - remember? "Our children will go to schools, and yours will sit in basements." It was planned that Russia was under martial law, and the West continued to consume croissants with kava. But it didn’t work out that way - while the burgher is blowing the whole tune that he is not at war, the burgher is faced with all the delights of a warring country and logically goes nuts from this. We in Russia understand that there is a war with NATO. But in Europe-USA they blow in their ears that there is no war, it's the natives there bang-bang. It's just getting worse and worse in London. That's why yesterday in London half a million who were completely brutalized from the war came out.
  9. +14
    February 2 2023
    For us, such deliveries are just additional targets that will be destroyed by our artillery and VKS.
    I guessed the author on this phrase, I didn’t read further, sorry hi
  10. +1
    February 2 2023
    Why Ukraine receives military assistance in a dosed manner
    . Nothing is done just like that!
    A long conflict, this is a long, stable money in the pockets of those who muddied it all ... you can wind up a lot of other things on this postulate, but still a point, the desire to earn it, will be decisive, ALWAYS!
  11. +8
    February 2 2023
    Quote: Stirbjorn
    I guessed the author on this phrase, I didn’t read further, sorry

    Reading this author, I immediately remember Konashenkov, who destroyed the APU "eleven" times.
    I understand that it’s impossible to completely go into the negative, but this “grumble”, in my opinion, does harm by an order of magnitude more than good.
  12. +7
    February 2 2023
    From the point of view of the Americans, the ideal situation was created in the 90s. Russia with a fully controlled economy, weak militarily, politically weak-willed.
    This is probably the fifth column, they tried, well, Boris Nikolayevich and Anatoly Chubais could not do such a thing .. smile Although I remember the phrase of Boris Nikolaevich: "Chubais is to blame for everything!" It’s just not clear if Chubais is to blame for everything, then how he spun around under the new presidents for so many years, and then safely dumped him abroad and yeah .. Chubais, the West did not impose sanctions, let alone some.
    1. +1
      February 2 2023
      Sulfur stench crept into the towers back in the 90s and ... and someone can say that it has weathered now, after the "red devil" dumped from there ??? Yes, and dumped whether, finally, the question? A well-known, prolific reptile, he could cut off the last ones and not a few.
      1. +1
        February 2 2023
        Sulfur stink crawled into the towers back in the 90s
        What has not yet weathered? Who ventilated?
        1. 0
          February 2 2023
          And how to check??? They let only their own people in there, and we, who are kept far away, are blown into our ears with a completely different wind, sweetened, flavored ... they don’t feel sorry for any odor for the people, and it’s cheap, it’s, for the price, in comparison ... compared to shorter. They can also let in a pink fog, the price is worthless, and the effect is "wonderful", significant.
          1. 0
            February 2 2023
            Quote: rocket757
            And how to check??? They let only their own people in there, and we, who are kept far away, blow in our ears with a completely different wind, sweetened, flavored ... they don’t feel sorry for any odor for the people ......

            Unfortunately, everything is so, Victor! You can check on the events that occur. And the fog? Yes! For this, from time to time socialist slogans, some reminders appear ..... without continuation
      2. 0
        February 2 2023
        Quote: rocket757
        Sulfur stench crept into the towers back in the 90s and ... and someone can say that it has weathered now, after the "red devil" dumped from there ??? ......

        Didn't fade! Not
  13. +2
    February 2 2023
    I think it is now clear why weapons are being handed over to Ukraine in strict doses.


    However, the dose is very high. In 2022, Zalezhnaya received about $90 billion worth of weapons and ammunition. More, probably, only the Pentagon received during the same time. All sorts of England-Germany-France - definitely less.
    Although ... not quite in horse food. Sane Western military experts draw their own conclusions and cringe at the thought of a direct military clash with the Russian Federation. It’s better with Iran, although I don’t really want to deal with Iran ...
  14. +1
    February 2 2023
    Quote: kor1vet1974
    This is probably the fifth column, they tried, well, Boris Nikolayevich and Anatoly Chubais could not do such a thing .. smile


    And who are they? Sixth column, huh? laughing
    1. +1
      February 2 2023
      And who are they? Sixth column, huh?
      If there were sixth or fifth, the Yeltsin Center, they would not win back .. would .. smile They did everything for the good and appointed shifters .. You yourself know who ...
  15. +1
    February 2 2023
    "For quite a long time, the Ukrainians, and we, cannot calm down after the decision of the West to transfer heavy tanks and other offensive equipment to Kyiv."
    IMHO, except for the media, which earns a salary on this, no one pays attention at all.
    There are no conversations in the kitchen or at work. Only slightly zazombirovannye experience something there.

    And in many respects the author is right.
    NATO is not stupid, it takes advantage of the situation - it gets rid of junk in small portions so as not to frighten the Kremlin, deploys the military-industrial complex, works out logistics, studies, captures markets and has a long-awaited scarecrow - a country that attacked without declaring war. All straight from the history of the 20th century.

    And for "volunteers and PMCs" and supplies of aid, and for not so much money, no one will declare war. Everyone does it. Moreover, the Kremlin itself sells a lot to NATO, incl. oil. Those are recycled and back, to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, for tanks and vehicles ... Who is approx, who is a rocket from above ...

    Well, in addition. Even Belarus did not recognize anything, especially Iran, China, India, Kazakhstan and other loyal countries. That is, according to them, this is not Truth and Justice, but a criminal offense for participation.
    1. 0
      February 2 2023
      Even Belarus nifinga did not recognize anything
      If Belarus recognizes, and they will seize something from her .. However, she is also in this case, but there will not be enough strength to seize something from someone ..
  16. 0
    February 2 2023
    Quote: rotmistr60
    And the nomenclature of Western weapons, of course, will constantly change in the direction of increasing their supply and more modern characteristics of these weapons.


    It won't be permanent. In any casino - the supply of chips is limited. "Bets are made, no more bets."
    Over time, the West will face a simple choice: to start supplying Ukraine with nuclear weapons, to get into the conflict itself, or to turn off this shop.
    The West will not want to take such a risk (direct war with the Russian Federation). The game is not worth the candle, and the result is labor.

    So, the faster the escalation goes, the faster its logical end will come.
    1. +1
      February 2 2023
      There is equipment for 23-24 years. For the 25th year, a tangible amount of Soviet types will already drop out for modernization on Bumar / Excalibur + the last Tvards will come.

      On the other hand, fundamental measures have already been taken to deploy the military-industrial complex. Shells, repair, lifting and modernization of equipment, production of new ones. Probably the year 25 will also go badly with large deliveries, just instead of BMPs, the M113 will go really en masse + Bradley + Marders + SV90 + modern Finnish / Slovak BMPs that will be replaced under contracts for SV90. Similarly, for tanks, there are more Abrams and Leopards, taking into account the large capacities for lifting equipment.

      The only thing is, if Trump wins, then for 25 years they will already be cut. But not a fact, let me remind you how the previous TrumpNyash-Myash ended. But if his main opponent, Desantis, wins, then on the contrary, deliveries in 25 will increase sharply.
      1. +1
        February 2 2023
        Quote: donavi49
        if Trump wins, then they will cut him for 25 years

        Let me remind you what the world looked like under Trump.
  17. +1
    February 2 2023
    For us, such supplies are just additional targets that will be destroyed.

    Underestimating the enemy is also bad.
    Secondly, the West is supplying not just tanks, but the creation and armament of the BTG with a full set of SAO, BMP tanks and the preparation of drugs. We calculated that there will be approximately 10 BTG.
    The question is, is it dangerous for the RF Armed Forces that 10 BTGs, included in NATO intelligence and command and control, delivered to the front?
  18. +2
    February 2 2023
    For us, such deliveries are just additional targets that will be destroyed by our artillery and VKS

    I suggest that the author personally go to the front and destroy these supplies fool
  19. +2
    February 2 2023
    Staver! Well, if deliveries are the next goals for us, what are we talking about? And you wrote a whole story, which, after the first sentence, you no longer want to read.
  20. 0
    February 2 2023
    Why Ukraine receives military assistance in a dosed manner


    Ukraine receives military assistance not in doses, but based on the complexity of the very weapons.
    Just in order to master complex Western weapons (air defense systems, tanks, MLRS, aircraft, helicopters), you need from several months to a year of training, or to supply all these weapons along with Western crews and crews. I think it’s no secret to anyone that the Haimars are in Ukraine operated exclusively by western operators.
    As a result, the illusion of apparent dosage arises, because in order to achieve the relative effectiveness of its weapons, the West has to supply it with its military personnel.
    The West would be glad not to supply its weapons, but Russia in Ukraine ground both the entire military potential of the independent left to it during the partition of the USSR (Russia) in the early 90s and all the Soviet weapons that the West managed to get to and deliver to Ukraine.

    All Western weapons, the development of which did not require long training, development, and Ukraine needed it, the West has been supplying in maximum quantities from the first days of the NMD to this day.
  21. +5
    February 2 2023
    And given the huge problems with the operation, repair, refueling, supply, even a slight damage turns the tank, especially American vehicles, into a pile of useless metal.
    If such jingoistic articles were printed on paper, then they could rightfully be called a pile of useless waste paper.
    We are waiting…
    Who are we: the authors or those who are in the "field"?!
    Naturally, the question of our future arises. What should we be afraid of and how should we react to the actions of opponents?
    I think the question should be answered directly, without options.
    We have nothing to fear!
    Well, yes, who would doubt the strength of our agitprop ...
  22. +8
    February 2 2023
    Everyone tried to find analytics in the article, since the article is in the "Analytics" section. But there is no analytics in it. A typical speech by a Soviet propagandist - agitator. Then I looked through the articles of this author and understood everything. This is the author who is still defending Kherson.
  23. -1
    February 2 2023
    Quote: donavi49
    There is equipment for 23-24 years. For the 25th year, a tangible amount of Soviet types will already drop out for modernization on Bumar / Excalibur + the last Tvards will come.

    On the other hand, fundamental measures have already been taken to deploy the military-industrial complex. Shells, repair, lifting and modernization of equipment, production of new ones. Probably the year 25 will also go badly with large deliveries, just instead of BMPs, the M113 will go really en masse + Bradley + Marders + SV90 + modern Finnish / Slovak BMPs that will be replaced under contracts for SV90. Similarly, for tanks, there are more Abrams and Leopards, taking into account the large capacities for lifting equipment.


    Soviet technology, in fact, has already dried up, which is why Western equipment is being supplied in large volumes.
    The tanks and planes of Soviet production ran out, everyone has already rowed
    .
    Where are the "fundamental measures" taken? In Ukraine? IN THE USA? In Europe?
    Where is production deployed and what? Will Abrams be mass-produced in the USA? Or will the production of "leopards" and "leclercs" be increased? By the way, how many of them are produced there per year, you won’t be pleased with the info?
    It is not so easy to do it, and money alone is not enough.
  24. -4
    February 2 2023
    Quote: kor1vet1974
    If they were the sixth or fifth, the Yeltsin Center, they wouldn’t win back .. would .. smile They did everything for the good and appointed replacements .. You know who ...


    That's just this changer, quite abruptly changed the course. Both in foreign and domestic policy. And someone close to EBN felt it quite strongly in his own skin.
  25. 0
    February 2 2023
    Quote: Civil
    1. Nuclear powers don't lose wars.


    If a nuclear power does not have the right or is afraid to use its own nuclear weapons, then it automatically ceases to be a nuclear power with all the ensuing consequences.
    hi
  26. -4
    February 2 2023
    If Western nuclear weapons in any form fall on the outskirts, then this will be a complete failure. We will get a new "Indo-Pakistani" conflict at our side for many years to come ((therefore, satanists must be kicked out of our land as soon as possible ... grind and that's enough, now it's time
    1. 0
      February 2 2023
      Quote from Aleprok
      We will have a new "Indo-Pakistani" conflict at our side for many years to come

      This conflict did not affect the development of India in any way. India lost the first battles for Kashmir and lost direct access to the USSR and Afghanistan. However, having gathered all her strength, she caught Pakistan on interethnic conflicts and quickly deprived Bangladesh of it with a swift blow, thus reducing Pakistan's human resources by almost half. conflict, Indira Gandhi would then have crushed Pakistan and divided it into several states. Then perhaps the USSR would not have been forced to wage war in Afghanistan. India has the ability to put pressure on Pakistan with the support of the Pashtun and Baloch separatists.
  27. +5
    February 2 2023
    Quote: Illanatol
    That's just this changer, quite abruptly changed the course.


    Exactly! The course has changed a lot. Approximately 360° Yes
  28. -3
    February 2 2023
    There is a time for everything. The Orthodox Russian Tsar will come and put things in order! Some corporations are a bunch of traders ..
  29. -2
    February 3 2023
    Quote from starina
    Exactly! The course has changed a lot. Approximately 360°


    Oh well. Like EBN could start a NWO in Ukraine. This is after they figured out for three in Belovezhskaya Pushcha.
    Logic rules!
    You can continue to live in your alternate reality, since it is more convenient for you there.
  30. -4
    February 3 2023
    In principle, the article is correct, unlike most published ones. The political game is in full swing with the beneficiaries along the way and in the end. The majority here adhere to extremely ultimatum views to destroy everything and everyone. The better the same fanatics in the West, but nothing
  31. +1
    February 3 2023
    Why assistance to Ukraine is dosed, because it’s all in the Second World War, the Americans told us: if Hitler wins, you need to help Stalin, if Stalin wins, then help Hitler and let them exterminate each other as much as possible. This is a cleansing of the genocide of the Slavs, by the hands of the Slavs under the control of Americans, Europeans, Jews.
    1. +1
      February 3 2023
      Quote: Alex66
      the Americans said: if Hitler wins, you need to help Stalin, if Stalin wins, then help Hitler and let them exterminate each other as much as possible.

      Let me remind you that when the time came to help Hitler, somewhere after Kursk, the Americans did not do this. Moreover, Italy was knocked out of the war exactly at that moment.

      The record month for the entire period of Lend-Lease in terms of tonnage was May 45th. Truman, the author of this very phrase, was already President of the United States.
  32. -1
    February 4 2023
    Nuclear weapons against a country without nuclear weapons? What are you, gentlemen? It's low.
    1. 0
      February 5 2023
      Of course, low .... but Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended the Second World War and began the revival of Japan. Maybe Lviv and Ternopil will do more for Ukraine?
  33. +2
    February 4 2023
    Dosed, by the fact that with a preventive strike on February 24, we destroyed the Nazi strike group that was preparing to finally resolve the issue with the Donbass. Plans for the future in the west were covered immediately. Wait, they use Sumeria as a testing ground for testing their military technologies and developments in all areas (not only weapons, but also tactics for controlling fighters). Open intervention and the introduction of their troops are not in their plans, because after an hour of fighting, tyao will be used, and in two, more serious nuclear weapons will begin to fly throughout Europe and the Russian Federation, and we will survive purely because of the size, but they won’t, but no fools are guaranteed to die.
  34. +3
    February 4 2023
    I think it is now clear why weapons are being handed over to Ukraine in strict doses. Exactly enough to make it impossible to defeat Kyiv, but it was also difficult to end the war. The fate of Ukraine is no longer interesting to the West.

    The main task is to wear down Russia.

    This was also the case during the Civil War. At the beginning, when the Red Army was weak, there was no help from the White Army from the Entente. When the Red Army got stronger, then help went to the armies of Denikin and Kolchak, but in dosed quantities, insufficient for the victory of the White Army, but sufficient to continue the civil war, turning it into a permanent conflict with the aim of impossibility of reviving Russia as a powerful state and no matter with what power. But the Soviet government won. The dosing of arms supplies did not help to prolong the war until the belligerents were completely exhausted. We know... passed
  35. -1
    February 5 2023
    Let me remind you of the "red lines", which, at the suggestion of the media, have become widely used by politicians. "Now, if you ..., then we...". But this very “if” happens, and ... nothing happens in response.

    Oh yes Staver, oh yes Yeshkin cat. Journalists and bloggers were so naughty that Putin, Lavrov, Medvedev could not stand it. They started talking about red lines.
    For us, such deliveries are just additional targets that will be destroyed by our artillery and VKS.

    As well as additional losses, because artillery and videoconferencing will destroy them at the forefront. How much did the notorious highmarses cost us in our lives?
    I am sure that commanders are already conducting classes to study German and American tanks. Tank commanders and gunners are well aware of the strengths and weaknesses of these vehicles. Commanders of artillery units, UAV operators, VKS pilots and even ordinary grenade launchers in motorized rifle and airborne units do exactly the same.

    We are waiting…

    Lying on the couch and writing such opuses, why not wait. Maybe to the front line, Mr. Staver, at least a military commissar? Share directly from the spot the joy of the fighters from the arrival of the leopards.
    It's too late to be afraid. There is no point in being afraid. What happened, happened. It is necessary to understand this. Understand and prepare countermeasures against Western intrigues.

    Who is this call to? If to the VO reader, then what practical countermeasures can he prepare? Well, except for spells and hat throwing. If to those who really can and should, then it is strange that they still have no understanding, but there is fear.
    Have you noticed how interest in the events in Ukraine is disappearing in our society? How calmly do people talk about the war in Ukraine and Europe?

    This is because in your society there are no relatives - contractors, mobilized and volunteers.
    Many write to me

    Well, just like YureSumy. Everyone also wrote to Tom, especially at the beginning of the NWO.
  36. 0
    February 9 2023
    Quote: RUSa
    And this offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, even if it fails, will help to wear down and weaken Russia even more. And in case of luck, albeit partial ...


    Moscow will sign the surrender? Don't even hope.
    Of course, the offensives of the Armed Forces of Ukraine do not exhaust or weaken Ukraine itself. Killed warriors resurrect again and go into battle again... the main thing is not to forget to turn on the "infinitive ammo" cheat code. laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"