Peter against archers: rebellion and executions 1698

43
Peter against archers: rebellion and executions 1698

Peter returned to Moscow when the rebellion was already suppressed. Romodanovsky conducted a superficial investigation, some archers were punished, but this investigation did not satisfy Peter, since they did not find the instigator and inspirer of the rebellion.

Revolt


And this rebellion arose like this.



After the capture of Azov, the Streltsy regiments carried out garrison service there. This was an unprecedented phenomenon, because before that the archers lived only in Moscow with their families. Then they were transferred to Velikiye Luki on the Polish border, and to Azov in their place they moved from Moscow all those archers who still remained in it. This aroused the indignation of the archers, among them a rumor spread that they would never be returned to Moscow.

When four streltsy regiments crossed to the Polish border, one and a half hundred streltsy fled the road in March 1698 and arrived in Moscow. There they heard talk about the tsar who allegedly died abroad, but more importantly, Sophia, who was in the Novodevichy Convent, through visitors, gave them a letter calling for a coup d'etat by means of a riot. The regiments moving towards Velikiye Luki soon learned about this.

They decided to support Sophia and moved towards Moscow in order to seize power. Against them, Prince Romodanovsky sent General Gordon with an army of four thousand and twenty-five guns. They met the archers at the Resurrection Monastery, and a few cannon volleys were enough for the rebels to flee. But not many managed to escape, most of them were captured and taken to Moscow.

On this rebellion ended, the investigation began.


"Archers". Painting by S. Ivanov

The whole course of the uprising was somewhat strange.

Why, for example, one and a half hundred archers lived quietly in Moscow for more than a month, although the government ordered them to return to their regiments? The fact is that rumors about the death of Peter really circulated in Moscow. The boyars were already beginning to believe in them, since there were no letters from the tsar for a long time. The fear that power would again be in the hands of Sophia made the boyars hesitate.

Finally, Romodanovsky received a reprimand from Peter from abroad:

“I don’t know where you get such a woman’s fear from. It happens that mail disappears, besides, there was a flood at that time. One should not expect anything with such cowardice.”

Investigation and torture


The investigation conducted by the boyar Shein did not satisfy Peter and, upon returning, he began a new search.

In mid-September 1698, the archers, who had previously been sent to prisons and monasteries, were taken to Moscow, in total 1 people were subjected to a new investigation. Torture began in the dungeons of the Preobrazhensky Prikaz. They were tortured cruelly, knocking out testimonies. Peter himself also took part in the torture, wanting to know the name of the initiator of the rebellion.

One of the archers was tortured seven times and received 99 blows of the whip, although not all survived to the fifteenth. Lieutenant Colonel Karpakov cut his throat with a knife to end the torment, but only wounded himself, and the torture continued.

The tortured did not want to name the initiator of the rebellion. One archer was raised on a rack, received 30 blows with a whip, slowly roasted on a fire, but did not utter a word. Still, the archers had amazing stamina: they were brutally tortured, subjected to unbearable torment, but they did not give out the name of Sophia.

As for Sophia, in these terrible days for the archers, she lived a carefree and far from monastic life. She was allowed to receive visitors and write letters.

In addition, the yard gave her 10 sterlets, two pikes, two barrels of caviar, two barrels of herring, cookies, nut butter, a bucket of honey, 4 buckets of beer, all kinds of food and drinks, vodka every day. It would seem that for one person it is too much. But Sophia gathered daily crowds of visitors, she arranged noisy feasts and, most likely, did not remember the archers at all. The princess continued to be a princess in the monastery.

But back to archers.

The torture still didn't work. With the archers, Peter showed all his cruelty, for which he would later be reproached. Obviously, he not only punished them for the rebellion, but also took revenge on them for the events of 1682, when drunken crowds of archers in front of his eyes, a ten-year-old child, brutally killed his relatives and relatives. If you try to imagine the impressions of the ten-year-old Peter, then his cruelty to the archers becomes clear.

During the investigation, nevertheless, Sophia's participation in the rebellion was revealed. There were archers who betrayed her. The first of them were the five hundred Maslov and the archer Ignatiev. During interrogation, they stated that Sophia wrote letters to the archers calling for a riot. When Peter arranged a confrontation between them and Sophia, the princess, knowing that the letters had not been preserved, declared that she did not know them.

Penalties


The investigation had not yet been completed, but the executions had already begun. The first batch of archers, 201 people, were executed on 30 September. The description of the executions was made by the secretary of the Austrian embassy, ​​Johann Georg Korb, who was then in Russia, in the Diary of a Journey to Muscovy. Korb told what he saw with his own eyes, so there is no reason not to believe him. This is how he described the first day of the executions:

“The dwellings of soldiers in Preobrazhenskoye are cut through by the Yauza River flowing there; on the other side of it, on small Moscow carts, 100 guilty were planted, waiting for their turn to be executed. How many were guilty, as many carts and as many guard soldiers; there were no priests in sight to give parting words to the condemned; yet everyone held a lit wax candle in their hands so as not to die without light and a cross. The bitter weeping of the wives increased their fear of the impending execution; moans and cries were heard all around the crowd...
Another 130 archers were brought to death from the estate of governor Shein. On both sides of all the city gates, two gallows were erected, and each was intended for six rebels that day. When everyone was taken out to the places of execution, and each six was distributed to each of the two gallows, his royal majesty in a green Polish caftan arrived, accompanied by many noble Muscovites, to the gates, where, by his decree, the tsar's ambassador stopped in his own carriage with representatives of Poland and Denmark".


Executions of shooters. Drawing from the "Diary" of Johann Korb

In October, executions of archers continued. On October 11, 144 archers were executed, on the 12th - 205, on the 13th - 141, on the 17th - 109, on the 18th - 65, on the 19th - 106 people. Peter himself acted as an executioner and cut off heads. He demanded the same from those close to him. Menshikov showed great activity here and chopped off more than twenty heads with his own hands.

Many boyars tried to keep up with him. The most awkward was Golitsyn, who could not cut off his head the first time. Because of this, his victims had to suffer. Every willing Muscovite could become an executioner, but there was no end to those who wanted to. Yes, among Muscovites there were many who hated archers.
The famous German scientist and acquaintance of Peter Leibniz, when he found out that he personally chopped off heads, expressed indignation about this.

Pyotr did not forget to punish Sophia, too, but she got off relatively lightly. 200 archers were hanged in the Novodevichy Convent, three of them hung in front of Sophia's windows for a long time, and in their hands they had petitions to her. This episode was captured in his painting by the great artist Ilya Repin. The princess herself lost her title and was tonsured a nun under the name Susanna. She died in 1704, not leaving the monastery until her death.


Painting by Ilya Repin "Princess Sofya Alekseevna in the Novodevichy Convent"

Even before the executions began on September 30, Patriarch Adrian came to Peter with an icon and began to ask for pardon for the archers. To this Peter answered him:

“Why did you come here with the icon? Get out of here, put the icon back and don't meddle in other people's business. I honor God and the Most Holy Theotokos more than you. My duty is to protect the people and execute the villains who encroach on their well-being."

On October 23, the investigation and executions were suspended, since Peter left Moscow that day and went to Voronezh, where they continued to build ships. Moscow was in a state of shock from the executions. The corpses of the executed remained unburied, they still hung on the gallows, poles in the vicinity of the Kremlin were decorated with archery heads.

In some places in Moscow, the heads of archers flaunted on poles until 1727. The bodies of the unfortunate were buried in the vicinity of Moscow only in February 1699. On their graves, by order of Peter, slabs were erected with a list of all the archery crimes.

The last mass executions of archers took place on February 13, 1699 on Red Square; that day 200 archers were beheaded. During all the executions, Peter stood next to the executioner, and Menshikov was with the tsar. Most archers went to their death courageously, without even thinking to ask for mercy. Only one archer, approaching the chopping block, began to beg Peter for mercy and say that he was being executed unfairly. To this Peter answered him:

"Die, wretch! If you prove innocent, then the guilt of your blood will fall on me."

Another condemned, before going up to the chopping block, said to Peter:

“Step aside, my lord. I should lie down here."

From September 30 to the end of October, a total of 1 archers were executed, and on February 166, another 13 executions. Of the 200 people who were investigated, only those under the age of twenty were saved. This means that the total number of those executed and those who died from torture can be estimated at about 1 people, but no less.

16 streltsy regiments that did not participate in the rebellion were disbanded, and the streltsy with their families were deported from Moscow to other cities and recorded in townships. But soon Peter regretted such a rash decision. Already on January 20, 1699, all the former privileges were returned to the provincial archers.

The Streltsy army was revived and, as subsequent events showed, in vain. Already in 1700, the provincial archers took part in the battle of Narva and were the first, throwing weaponfleeing the battlefield. In 1702, Peter issued a decree on the recruitment of four more archery regiments. In 1705, the archers took part in the Astrakhan rebellion. Subsequently, they were gradually disbanded.

The executions of archers left their mark not only in Russian storiesbut also in painting. Repin's painting "Princess Sophia" has already been mentioned, which depicts archers hung on the windows of the princess. But the most famous painting on the theme of the executions of archers is undoubtedly Vasily Surikov's "Morning of the Streltsy Execution".


"Morning of the Streltsy Execution". V. Surikov

This picture was painted in 1881. The artist worked on it for a long time, thinking over every detail, every person. In the end, it turned out what happened. Gloomy October morning, Red Square, St. Basil's Cathedral. Crowds of archers are led to execution, their wives, mothers, and children are crying nearby. The old woman, depicted in the foreground of the picture, weeps for her son, who in a few minutes should be beheaded. Perhaps several of her sons will be executed.

But our main attention is attracted by a red-haired archer in a hat with a candle in his hand. His angry, hate-filled gaze is directed at Peter, who also clashes with his eyes. The tsar hates archers no less than they hate him. In the views of Peter and the archer, the past of Russia, which has become obsolete, and the future, personified by Peter, clashed, as it were.

One archer has already said goodbye to everyone and is preparing to lay his head on the chopping block. The blood is about to spurt and the severed head rolls. But Surikov deliberately did not show the execution process itself. It's like in a horror movie: it's not the blood itself that is scary, but the expectation of what should happen.

The morning of the Streltsy execution is the morning of October 11, 1698, when 144 people were executed. The picture depicts almost all layers of the then population of Russia: the tsar, next to him are foreigners, an elderly boyar with a long gray beard stands nearby, the convicts are led by the Preobrazhenians - the basis of the future regular army. And, finally, in the foreground is an old woman who, after the execution of her sons, has lost her meaning in life, and next to her is a little girl who probably understood what should happen to her dad.
Thus, Peter now defeated his main political opposition, those who most opposed his reforms and who hated Peter himself most of all.

It could be said that pre-Petrine Rus' also became a thing of the past with the archers, but this is not true, since not only they were its personification, but also much of what Peter was going to change in the future.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    4 February 2023 05: 15
    Eh, the Author did not have to dig this topic.
    In the sub-Soviet period, in the pseudoscientific world, there was a practice of writing monographs on related topics using a tape recorder. The applicant took a work with a similar topic, read it, then retold it in his own words to be recorded on a tape recorder, and later, while listening, prepared a draft.
    See above very, very much looks like a similar method of writing. So many children's mistakes, inaccuracies and mistakes, in principle, cannot be if Andrei worked with the texts of the sources.
    Best regards, good day everyone.
    R.s. I hope I'm wrong..
    1. 0
      5 February 2023 12: 57
      I write on topics that interest me. Nobody does what you described now, tape recorders and so on. Now there is a rewrite. Although it is not prohibited, this text, if anything, is not a rewrite. And yes, a list of blunders from this article to the studio, with links is desirable. If I'm really wrong somewhere, I'll correct it. When you write 20 articles a month, somewhere an error or inaccuracy could well have crept in.
      1. +1
        5 February 2023 16: 41
        Ai Like Russian History! Thank you for such a broadcast of those events! It's interesting, it's true... But what is a rewrite??? Is this something xeroxed or... Just a remake?
      2. 0
        10 March 2023 16: 14
        "Are you really typing at 10000 characters per minute?..."
  2. +4
    4 February 2023 05: 15
    Something too bloodthirsty everything is painted ... Reminds me of horror stories about Ivan the Terrible ...
    1. +2
      4 February 2023 10: 07
      Well, yes, according to the amendments to the "Constitution", the kings now must be described only in a positive way and nothing else. And the popular names of these characters: "Terrible", "Antichrist", "Bloody", etc., stuck to them, it is clear that only due to a misunderstanding, and purely due to the lack of education of an orphan people who did not understand all the greatness of these rulers, well, and no other way than at the intrigues of the State Department. Yeah.
    2. +1
      5 February 2023 11: 19
      How to say. All the same, there are specific numbers. In fact, almost all the rebels, about 2500 people, were exterminated.
  3. +2
    4 February 2023 05: 17
    No, after all, the book of A.N. Tolstoy, and not the film!
    1. +5
      4 February 2023 06: 37
      No, after all, the book of A.N. Tolstoy
      No, taken from different sources, the style of the paragraphs is different ..
    2. 0
      5 February 2023 12: 59
      Dispel your doubts, not a book or a movie)
  4. +10
    4 February 2023 05: 32
    Petra's sister Sophia framed several thousand people ... as a result, the massacre cost the lives of many archers.
    Conclusion ... ordinary citizens and military personnel ... smile never participate in family squabbles with those in power ... you can lose your head and property.
    1. +6
      4 February 2023 10: 10
      Petra's sister Sophia framed several thousand people ... as a result, the massacre cost the lives of many archers.

      Not a fact, a lot of controversial points.
      If we look at the documents of the Preobrazhensky Order, then even Romandanovsky was initially inclined to believe that circumstances, and not the political appeals of Princess Sophia, brought the archers to a “revolt”.
      1. The author forgot to mention the reasons for the relocation of archers to the western borders from near Azov. In the Commonwealth, the next elections of "Krul" began. It was necessary to support the Russian party, more precisely the Russian-Saxon in the person of Augustus. The campaign was executed mediocre, upon arrival at the western borders - the camp was not prepared. In fact, for two years, the archers who were not at home were engaged in looting. The electives who arrived from the regiments were greeted affectionately by Romadanovsky, they were given monetary allowances. Which most of those who arrived in the capital, there and lowered.
      None of those who returned personally read the diplomas. They were read to them in the camp, and the content of the letters varied.
      Having tied up the officers, the regiments moved home to the women. Gordon, who met them, smashed with one volley on top of the heads, the rest played the "hare". If I'm not mistaken, we caught archers for three days. Initially, only the instigators of the "5 dozen" were executed. The rest were flogged and released.
      Peter began the repressions, he had a chip “we don’t stand on ceremony with traitors.”
      The rioters hung at the windows of the princess had already fake letters.
      And yes, they did not hold them in their hands, but were even put into the sleeves of their caftans.
      1. +3
        4 February 2023 16: 25
        An interesting but cruel century. They didn’t stand on ceremony especially. Vaughn, Peter did not regret his son either ..
        1. +1
          4 February 2023 19: 23
          Great transformations are inevitably based on blood. Like the greatness of empires.
          1. +3
            4 February 2023 20: 31
            Quote: Jager
            Great transformations are inevitably based on blood. Like the greatness of empires.

            The second thesis is questionable.
            Violence, yes, is one of the most effective and primitive ways of any kind. A more complex, but no less effective method is economics.
            However, he is not the most productive. For example, the Romans practiced social methods. One of them is "bread and circuses"!!!
            So the toolkit of the "greatness of empires" is quite wide and is not always associated with violence.
    2. +1
      5 February 2023 23: 02
      Here, how lucky, if in a family showdown they guess on the side of the winner, then further orders, titles, positions.
    3. 0
      10 March 2023 16: 15
      ...become powerful yourself!
  5. +5
    4 February 2023 06: 08
    Why, for example, one and a half hundred archers lived quietly in Moscow for more than a month, although the government ordered them to return to their regiments?

    Apparently, because they considered themselves a force capable of influencing power. Nothing new and aging, as evidenced by the subsequent "Guards" coups in Russia. As, however, in Europe.
    The tortured did not want to name the initiator of the rebellion

    So after all, they "talked" and Sophia went to the monastery., And Golitsyn went into exile.
    ,
  6. +7
    4 February 2023 06: 34
    “It means this: Caesar was killed, but they still didn’t succeed there! Two more were found: Caesar’s relative, Octavian, and Caesar’s workmate, Antony” (c).
    "Oh, how many wonderful discoveries we have
    Prepare an enlightened spirit,
    And the experience of the son of errors difficult,
    And a genius, a friend of paradoxes, "(c)
    "The Northern War and the Swedish invasion of Russia" is the fundamental work of E.V. Tarle .. We are waiting for a retelling of this work.
    1. +10
      4 February 2023 07: 34
      - Yes, to graduate school - it's probably too early for you.
      1. +9
        4 February 2023 14: 25
        - Yes, to graduate school - it's probably too early for you.
        It's too early ..
  7. +11
    4 February 2023 06: 47
    Unclear. The bulk of the archers courageously endured torture and accepted the execution, but did they run from the battlefield, or, as near Azov, did they not go into battle?
    And in the last battle with Preobrazhenets and Semenovtsy, they fled from several volleys of cannons. They went to the chopping block, but in battle they did not differ much.
    1. +3
      4 February 2023 08: 09
      Also drew attention to this moment, some kind of inconsistency. Or the unwillingness of the archers to fight for Peter? But then why did they immediately run away from Gordon? There are many questions.
    2. Fat
      +7
      4 February 2023 09: 19
      hi In the battle near the New Jerusalem Monastery, the "government" troops came out with the battalion of Preobrazhentsev (N. von Salm), the battalion of Semenovtsev (I. Angler), the Butyrsky regiment (P. Gordon), the Lefortovo regiment (Yu.S. Lim) and artillery under the command of G. de Grage ... Approximately 4000 personnel and 25 guns. The regiments of the "soldiers' system" occupied the monastery, and nearby also the governor Shein with 4000 local cavalry ...
      Gordon twice went to the camp of the archers, persuading them to state their demands in a peaceful way and return to their duties ...
      After negotiations failed, Gordon ordered the first salvo to be fired. The battle lasted about an hour, after which the archers began to scatter and surrender. The prisoners were placed in the Resurrection Monastery.
      According to Gordon's report, the loss of archers was 62 people, of which 22 were killed, the loss of Shein's troops - 4 people were wounded ...
      What were the chances of about 2200 rebel archers?
      1. Fat
        +6
        4 February 2023 09: 54
        Artist Artur Orlenov. "Fight at the New Jerusalem Monastery"
        1. +3
          4 February 2023 10: 45
          I’m talking about something else - they didn’t differ in battles, even though in battle there are more chances to survive than when suppressing a rebellion, or did they expect that they would scold and forgive? But after all, they went to the chopping block without begging for mercy, but under the same Azov, during the assault they simply stopped or sat on the ground, but did not go to the walls.
          As so, complete cowardice in battle, but courageously to be executed.
          1. +2
            4 February 2023 11: 30
            Quote: Khibiny Plastun
            they went to the chopping block without begging for mercy, but under the same Azov, during the assault they simply stopped or sat on the ground, but did not go to the walls.
            As so, complete cowardice in battle, but courageously to be executed.

            And if you think like that ... in battle they stopped and sat down on the ground in the hope that most of them would survive, save their lives! The "practice" of that time was taken into account! (By the way, after the rebellion before Peter's intervention, the archers first "got off with little blood"!) During the execution, the archers no longer had any "illusions"! No more hope for forgiveness! And the concept of human dignity was even then!
            1. Fat
              +5
              4 February 2023 12: 33
              hi Vladimir.
              Quote: Nikolaevich I
              The "practice" of that time was taken into account! (By the way, after the rebellion before Peter's intervention, the archers first "got off with little blood"!) During the execution, the archers no longer had any "illusions"! No more hope for forgiveness! And the concept of human dignity was even then!

              When Peter returned from the "Great Embassy", the captive archers could count on life, after what he saw in 1682, it was more than stupid.
              It's the desperate courage of a cornered rat...
              Shortly before this rebellion, in February 1697, Peter learned that they wanted to kill him again. Conspiracy of Colonel Ivan Tsikler. Cycler and his accomplices were quartered, the corpse of Sophia's closest associate, Ivan Miloslavsky, who died in 1685, was brought to the place of execution on a sleigh drawn by pigs and placed under a chopping block so that blood dripped on him.

              Adolphe Charlemagne. "Peter I covers the conspirators in the house of Zikler on February 23, 1697"
            2. +2
              4 February 2023 17: 53
              It is one thing: a riot because of a salary delay, another - an attempt to seize power. In the end, something similar happened in 1682, but this time the archers did not kill anyone (the losses of government troops were negligible), another thing is a rebellion, instigated by Tsarina Sophia, in order to seize power ... In the first case, the archers had at least a minimal hope of surviving, because then in 1682 they were forgiven, they were forgiven for much more, and in 1689, Peter Alekseevich himself did not execute anyone. The archers also hoped for influential patrons, among whom was not only and not so much Princess Sophia: after the events of the Streltsy rebellion, Peter's wife, Tsarina Evdokia, also went to the monastery. In the event of the death of Peter the Great, and such rumors circulated, she would act as regent for the little Tsarevich Alexei. And for an attempt to seize power, for which the archers were accused, death was supposed, and Peter the Great only fulfilled the norm of the law. The time for female rule has not yet arrived. Well, the fact that not everyone loved archers is true. Not all boyars and nobles and others have forgotten how their relatives and friends were massively killed in 1682, and this is precisely what led to the collapse of the conspiracy: they did not like Peter with his reforms, and they feared and hated the archers ...
            3. -1
              5 February 2023 20: 12
              There is also a religious aspect: archers are mostly Old Believers, and Peter is an enemy of faith for them.
      2. +2
        4 February 2023 11: 04
        Even, I see that the archers were seized by a general insanity: it’s clear that there is nothing to “catch”, but they moved forward
  8. +6
    4 February 2023 08: 07
    Two worlds collided, if you look from a slightly different angle, then a mini civil war. Well, the modernization of Russia could not be avoided, otherwise it would vegetate in the backyards of Europe as a third-rate power. And most likely, the fate of China in the 19th century would have awaited us. Although it is easy to talk about it now, then, after all, this modernization swept like an iron rink not only through the fates, but through the lives of people. Direct analogy with the post-revolutionary time.
  9. +4
    4 February 2023 11: 00
    Good day everyone. I see that the author has read Tolstoy.
    But Tolstoy was brighter
  10. +1
    4 February 2023 11: 14
    Now, too, it would not hurt to sort out liberda and five-columns in this way. It would be cleaner
  11. -6
    4 February 2023 11: 45
    The history of the 17th century was completely rewritten by the usurpers "Romanovs" in order to confirm the legitimacy of their power. Sophia is not Peter's sister! Read "Building a Consistent Version of the History of the 16th-18th Centuries" by Kasatkin
    https://royallib.com/book/kas_aleksandr/stroim_posledovatelnuyu_versiyu_istorii_16_18_vekov.html
  12. +1
    4 February 2023 12: 20
    In time, however, they painted the theme of Peter. As if by chance, but I think on purpose.
  13. +2
    4 February 2023 12: 56
    The history of the 17th century was completely rewritten by the usurpers "Romanovs" in order to confirm the legitimacy of their power. Sophia is not Peter's sister! Read "Building a Consistent Version of the History of the 16th-18th Centuries" by Kasatkin
    https://royallib.com/book/kas_aleksandr/stroim_posledovatelnuyu_versiyu_istorii_16_18_vekov.html

    For some reason, when reading such comments, I immediately remember "The End of the Chronologue", it is interesting that the alternative people read this story, maybe when they read it, they will come to their senses a little? laughing
  14. +7
    4 February 2023 12: 57
    How much all the same nonsense art I read. Sagittarius, who cowardly ran away after being hit by cannons, suddenly become monsters that endure all tortures as one. Maybe heels and endured, the rest did not know anything but rumors, so stupid. Peter is shown as an idiot who doesn't seem to understand who the instigator is. His task was not to punish Sophia, but to make her the cause of executions, so that it would not occur to anyone to repeat. I wonder how the colonel during the torture could try to stab himself? How was he tortured? After the whips and the rack, you can't take the knife away. Well, the fact that they were executed, everything is fine, the times were like that, and to go against the king means to go against the state, then only death is for it.
  15. +4
    4 February 2023 14: 07
    Quote: Victor Sergeev
    How much all the same nonsense art I read. Sagittarius, who cowardly ran away after being hit by cannons, suddenly become monsters that endure all tortures as one. Maybe heels and endured, the rest did not know anything but rumors, so stupid. Peter is shown as an idiot who doesn't seem to understand who the instigator is. His task was not to punish Sophia, but to make her the cause of executions, so that it would not occur to anyone to repeat.


    It is possible that this whole streltsy rebellion is a well-prepared (by Peter and his entourage) provocation in order to finally get rid of Sophia and her associates. Streltsov - they just set it up ... perhaps some of them understood this, but nothing could be changed.
  16. 0
    10 March 2023 16: 32
    Yes, everything in life repeats itself. Man is a fish that follows in the same footsteps. It began with the migration of Cromoniens or Siberians or Indians, or whatever.
    1. 0
      April 2 2023 11: 22
      Quote from DiViZ
      migrations of Cromoniens

      Pachim only "Kromoniens"? And the Nyondirthals? wink
  17. 0
    14 March 2023 20: 49
    I read it with pleasure, thanks to the author good Do not listen to anyone, write to yourself for joy
  18. 0
    April 2 2023 11: 19
    Thanks for the articles. Lenin's formulation "the state is violence" is always true, and the state, headed by a cowardly loafer and / or idler, is doomed to destruction. Write and do not listen to couch "historians".