Analysts offered the US ways to end the conflict in Ukraine

31
Analysts offered the US ways to end the conflict in Ukraine

The American research center RAND Corporation published a report in which they analyzed ways to avoid a prolonged armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine.

The document published on the organization's portal indicates that it is unprofitable for the national interests of the United States to prolong hostilities. Proceeding from this, analysts suggest the American administration to take four steps aimed at resolving the current situation as soon as possible. These include, for example, forcing the Ukrainian authorities to start negotiations as a condition for providing military support.



In addition, the government of the United States is invited to assume the role of guarantor of the security and neutrality of Ukraine. Also, according to analysts, the United States should name a number of conditions necessary to mitigate anti-Russian sanctions.

However, at present, the American authorities are not doing anything to end the armed conflict in Ukraine; moreover, steps are being taken to prolong the hostilities as much as possible. The United States provides comprehensive support to the Kyiv regime, which is ready to fight to the last Ukrainian. At the expense of American taxpayers, the Ukrainian army is fully financed, the United States and its European allies, who can safely be called vassals, supply Kyiv with impressive volumes of weapons of all types, including Tanks.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    28 January 2023 10: 46
    The war in Ukraine is beneficial to the United States, that's the whole conversation!
    1. +7
      28 January 2023 10: 48
      RAND Corporation published a report in which they analyzed ways to avoid a prolonged armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine.

      Bees against honey? belay
      1. +2
        28 January 2023 11: 49
        It is clear that Kyiv is a puppet of Washington, and negotiations will not begin without his order.
        But the role of the guarantor and mediator in the negotiations - well, their "censorship".
        The United States (and anyone who supplied the Nazis) should not be allowed to act as an intermediary. They will not be neutral.
        And the United States should not be allowed to act as a guarantor. Deceived.
      2. +2
        28 January 2023 12: 30
        Quote: LIONnvrsk
        RAND Corporation published a report in which they analyzed ways to avoid a prolonged armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine.

        Bees against honey? belay

        forcing the Ukrainian authorities to start negotiations as a condition for providing military support

        How's that?
        America will force Ukraine to negotiate in exchange for the supply of tanks, aircraft and long-range missiles?
        Arachnid sits in a baseball cap in Turkey, serving time in peace negotiations in order to keep the war going?

        America loves always and everywhere to be the first - it's time to introduce the Nobel Prize for hypocrisy. America year after year will be the permanent winner of this award - no one can even claim next to it.
      3. 0
        28 January 2023 12: 47
        Quote: LIONnvrsk
        Bees against honey?
        The Rand Corporation works to analyze problems and find solutions to them. And this means that the US sees the problem in its inability to provide long-term effective support to Ukraine. The consequence of this inefficiency may be a global decline in the authority of the United States in the world, and with it - the collapse of the dollar and the bankrupt state instead of the world hegemon.
        1. -2
          29 January 2023 11: 56
          Kamlania on the topic "the dollar will collapse" we have been hearing for fifty years. How many times has the ruble collapsed during this time? Maybe we need to think about this, and not about America?
    2. +2
      28 January 2023 11: 00
      The war is beneficial for them, but for us?
      ..the government of the United States proposes to assume the role of guarantor of the security and neutrality of Ukraine.

      Yes, they generally pooh .. Renel, where is America, where is Russia and where is the country, purely geographically ..
      Drive them away with a filthy broom.
    3. +2
      28 January 2023 11: 00
      Of course: they threw off all the rubbish of Europe, drove all the rags onto the battlefield, provided their military-industrial complex with orders for a decade.
      1. -1
        29 January 2023 11: 57
        The money that the military-industrial complex receives is a loss for the whole society. This money will not go to schools, hospitals and pensions.
    4. -3
      29 January 2023 11: 54
      Exactly the opposite. The NWO dealt a big blow to the global economy, from which almost all countries of the world suffered. In addition, the United States is forced to bear additional costs to support Ukraine. No matter how you look at it, there is damage everywhere.
  2. +6
    28 January 2023 10: 51
    How can you take this seriously. Guarantees? Yes, the United States spat on all its guarantees and agreements. What is the point of signing something with them? They will still find an excuse that it's not them. Why is NATO involved in the war in Ukraine? Ukraine has never been in NATO and in the EU too. Education in Russian is prohibited in Ukraine, Russian-speaking residents are killed, and so on. And everything is fine for the USA.
    Therefore, the United States, having limited us with a treaty, will be able to do their dirty deeds, for example, with the hands of Poland.
    1. +1
      28 January 2023 11: 00
      full financing of the Ukrainian army is carried out,
      And who will pay for the banquet? The bourgeoisie won’t give a dollar for free - they’ll rip off like sticky, what’s left .....
      1. +4
        28 January 2023 11: 48
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        full financing of the Ukrainian army is carried out,
        And who will pay for the banquet? The bourgeoisie won’t give a dollar for free - they’ll rip off like sticky, what’s left .....

        The media is discussing the topic of the possible transfer of part of the Ukrainian territory to Poland as a "debt for care", after which Warsaw will pay off this debt to creditors for a certain number of years. Apparently for this reason, the logs have developed an appetite and they are increasingly rolling out a ball to Berlin to pay reparations for the Second World War, with which they, in turn, will pay off the debt to the mattresses. In short, the Poles want to get two freebies (land and babosy), mattresses will recoup investments and receive long-term contracts for the supply of American weapons to eurolochs, and the Germans will be lowered below the plinth by deindustrialization. Banderlogs will get flags, whistles, drums with beads and other rubbish
        1. 0
          28 January 2023 12: 41
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          The media is discussing the topic of the possible transfer of part of the Ukrainian territory to Poland as a "debt for care", after which Warsaw will pay off this debt to creditors for a certain number of years. Apparently for this reason, the logs have developed an appetite and they are increasingly rolling out a ball to Berlin to pay reparations for the Second World War, with which they, in turn, will pay off the debt to the mattresses.

          Also heard about it.

          After the end of the war, according to their scenario, is it necessary to somehow return the money ruined by the West?
          Ukraine, which they want to get in the end, will not have money.
          Here, however, the Russian 300 lard turned up at the right time ... But will there be enough of them for everyone? And just do - it is necessary to appoint one extreme!
          So they want the Poles to dump the land, so that the Poles pay for everything. Well, like, "accepted the inheritance with an encumbrance," as lawyers say.

          There is only "a little" left - for the war to end the way America needs.
          But in fact, it turns out that investing money in Ukraine is the stupidest investment America has ever made.
  3. +5
    28 January 2023 10: 51
    In addition, the government of the United States is invited to assume the role of guarantor of the security and neutrality of Ukraine.

    Apparently, these "analysts" have in mind the introduction of US troops into the territory of Ukraine on a permanent basis. Type to ensure the neutrality of Ukraine. am
    1. +2
      28 January 2023 11: 55
      Quote: Former soldier
      Apparently, these "analysts" have in mind the introduction of US troops into the territory of Ukraine on a permanent basis. Type to ensure the neutrality of Ukraine.

      There are no other options, but we do not need the Ramstein-2 base on the territory of Ukraine.
    2. +2
      28 January 2023 12: 45
      Quote: Former soldier
      Apparently, these "analysts" have in mind the introduction of US troops into the territory of Ukraine on a permanent basis. Type to ensure the neutrality of Ukraine.

      Yeah ...
      They already wanted to ensure the “neutrality” of Crimea, they already ensured the “neutrality” of Ukraine ...

      Just doves, damn it! Wherever they put their pig's snout, peace and "neutrality" are everywhere.
      Only they understand "neutrality" in their own way - slavish submission to America and a willingness to break away and bark at the first American: "Face!"
      1. +2
        28 January 2023 14: 20
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        really pigeons, damn it! Wherever they put their pig's snout, peace and "neutrality" are everywhere.

        After the recognition by the West, for which they needed Minsk-2, now only the frostbitten can believe them.
  4. +3
    28 January 2023 11: 01
    the United States government is invited to assume the role of guarantor of the security and neutrality of Ukraine
    They probably write, and then everyone laughs in unison over what they have scrawled. Well, after the statement of the Nazis with the paddling pools about guarantees and compliance with the Minsk agreements, they simply hold us for "suckers". Therefore, everything is only on Russian terms and only after the destruction of the ukrofascist evil spirits along with his ghouls in the government. Accordingly, leave them only the Western Outskirts, return all Russian cities to Russia (we will hold referendums if necessary).
  5. +1
    28 January 2023 11: 11
    forcing the Ukrainian authorities to start negotiations as a condition for providing military support
    Those. to negotiate while continuing to arm Kyiv? We went through with the help of Merkel and Hollande, what we came to is also understandable.
  6. +2
    28 January 2023 11: 12
    In short, try once again to deceive us.
    1. +1
      28 January 2023 13: 10
      No, do not cheat ..., "cheat again"!
  7. 0
    28 January 2023 11: 16
    In addition, the government of the United States is invited to assume the role of guarantor of the security and neutrality of Ukraine.

    And somewhere and when, and in what conflict, the United States was the guarantor. It's more like that, but vice versa.
  8. +2
    28 January 2023 11: 17
    In addition, the government of the United States is invited to assume the role of guarantor of the security and neutrality of Ukraine. Also, according to analysts, the United States should name a number of conditions necessary to mitigate anti-Russian sanctions.
    . If you think...
    Striped whales DO NOT LIKE to take on any obligations, they reject them as best they can.
    Obligations of minke whales DO NOT COST ANYTHING, everyone who is friends with common sense has long been convinced of this.
  9. -1
    28 January 2023 11: 36
    the United States government is invited to assume the role of guarantor of the security and neutrality of Ukraine
    Funny joke.
    1. 0
      28 January 2023 12: 08
      So what?
      The US government provides guarantees.
      Then the elections, the government changes, the obligations are cancelled.
      The theme tested in Ukraine with Yanukovoshch, a working theme smile
  10. 0
    28 January 2023 12: 10
    In addition, the government of the United States is invited to assume the role of guarantor of the security and neutrality of Ukraine.

    Che-e-e-th?! What neutrality?! Which States? What Ukraine?!
  11. +2
    28 January 2023 12: 47
    Can the US act as a guarantor in international treaties? You can recall the history of the nuclear deal with Iran. If anyone has forgotten, on July 14, 2015, Iran and the 5+1 countries (China, Russia, Great Britain, France, USA + Germany) reached an agreement on the Iranian nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of sanctions against Iran. This agreement to end the Iranian nuclear program was called the nuclear deal, and the guarantor of this nuclear deal was then US President Obama. But already in 2018, the next US President Donald Trump announced the US withdrawal from the nuclear deal and announced a new package of sanctions against Iran. That is, the conclusion suggests itself that all US international guarantees last only within one presidential term of the next US president. Five years later, another presidential election happens. A new president comes to power with a new administration, and all the previous international agreements and guarantees the new president with the new administration simply put a bolt on.
  12. 0
    28 January 2023 13: 21
    Even if the leadership of the States goes to such negotiations, then Russia should not do this in any case. Because the States have NEVER in history concluded a single deal with any country that would be even beneficial to both parties equally! The treaty for America is a set of agreements that are solely for the benefit of America itself. To the other side, glass beads are usually offered as buns.
    Yes, even on the beads - America is likely to throw in the end. Because the entire history of US treaties is a history of kiddies and violations of the terms of treaties with enemies, partners, and even frank friends.

    And one more very important point: the States call for negotiations with enemies only in one case - if they openly and unambiguously lose (directly themselves or lose their interests somewhere). In all other cases, they are ready to accept only surrender.
  13. -1
    28 January 2023 20: 14
    Found a guarantor. Good anecdote. Have fun.
  14. 0
    29 January 2023 19: 43
    In addition, the Government of the United States is invited to assume the role of guarantor of security and neutrality Ukraine.


    Boo ha ha! lol laughing wassat

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"