Russia has created a radar station capable of detecting lightweight drones

Russian researchers have developed a new radar station (RLS) capable of detecting low-weight drones.

According to the press service of the National Technology Initiative, the station was assembled using components exclusively of domestic production and is capable of tracking even light aircraft weighing 10 grams or more that do not fall into the line of sight at a distance of up to 150 kilometers.

The station is capable of detecting and measuring the coordinates of unmanned aerial vehicles, regardless of the time of day and weather conditions, as well as determining their range, speed of movement, and then transmitting the received data.

In addition, Russian enterprises that are part of the Rostec system are massively creating reconnaissance and strike Dronesdesigned for the needs of a special military operation. The mass appearance of such equipment radically changed the nature of warfare. Small tactical drones are capable of conducting reconnaissance operations, automatically detect enemy positions, and also direct artillery strikes. In addition, copters can drop grenades at the enemy.

At present, domestic Lancet attack drones, which were developed by specialists from the Kalashnikov concern, are widely used at the front. Drones of this type have already shown their high performance.

The "Lancet" is capable of carrying high-explosive fragmentation and cumulative ammunition and hitting enemy equipment and manpower at a distance of 40-70 kilometers.

Comments

[Nexcom]

Well done, if you really created and not on paper for reporting. Certify, start producing and join the troops. It will be useful against Svidomite drones.

[Scipio]

Agree! Such news is very encouraging. Send to the army faster

[Grandfather]

all sorts of "quadrics, for more than .... years .. have been honored.

[Andy_nsk]

Certify

Since when does this product require certification?
http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_94853/

[fiv]

Why not print a weekly bulletin - how many missiles, shells, sights, radars have been produced, how and what R&D is progressing. Bald Mishka proclaimed publicity, after all.

[dmi.pris1]

Do you still live with the "labeled" one? And yes, for what purpose are you interested in the amount of production?

[fiv]

I don't like such statements. If this is real work, then secrecy must be observed. If not, then this is propaganda aimed at us in the first place. I no longer live with the "labeled", it was sarcasm

[voyaka uh]

"and also determine their range, speed of movement, and then transmit the received data" ///
----
Does the system know how to direct missiles, for example, Shell?

[Nexcom]

most likely this is a matter of integration into specific systems, probably in the development process

[Paul Siebert]

Quote: voyaka uh

"and also determine their range, speed of movement, and then transmit the received data" ///
----
Does the system know how to direct missiles, for example, Shell?

There is no need to point the "shell" at the quadrics. He sees them and shoots them down with projectiles.
Radar-ku was created in the interests of the infantry, which is constantly nightmare xoxlyatsky drones.
We need to stamp out more of these stations as soon as possible.
And dump Svidomo garbage on the way up. After all, the detection radius of the radar is decent - 10 km.

[abrakadabre]

capable of tracking at a distance of up to 10 kilometers even light aircraft weighing 150 grams or more, which do not fall into the line of sight.

Does the system know how to direct missiles, for example, Shell?

Along the way, they finally brought it to the finished ROFAR sample. It has been long overdue. It is very, very lacking for our troops, in order to, if not nullify, then qualitatively fend off the corresponding modern Western weapons.
For ROFAR there is no "stealth". Within the radio horizon, ROFAR allows not only to identify the mark of a large target, but to naturally build its portrait, similar to the visible one. Only adjusted for the shifted waveband. With some degree of permission.

[air wolf]

Well done, now you will need to attach a more powerful laser to this radar and there will be the necessary air defense system against Drones

[dmi.pris1]

Yes, yes! he also needs a truck with a powerful power source! No, this is how it should be done at a specially protected object

[Bingo]

Hehe))) It's not just to detect, it's a means of guidance ... That is, a real drone-killer, moreover, a universal one - at least shoot down Geraniums, at least "smart swarms" of crumbs - just not far off.
And what about the "pyrids"? Again, cartoons are drawn, as with hypersound? Do not rub your palms - they will think otherwise

[aszzz888]

"Lancet" is capable of carrying high-explosive fragmentation and cumulative ammunition and hitting enemy equipment and manpower at a distance of 40-70 kilometers

"Lancet" well done, hard worker! How many different kinds of equipment have already been sent to the next world on his account. Someday a monument will be erected to him.

[Kerensky]

capable of tracking at a distance of up to 10 kilometers even light aircraft weighing 150 grams or more, which do not fall into the line of sight.

Target selection? How does she cut off birds? And them, within a radius of 10 km. there can be a lot ... from 150 gr. Natural interference, snow - rain?

[voyaka uh]

Distinguishing between small drones and birds is one of the most difficult tasks.
It was solved in the Iron Dome system for several years.

[Hey]

There are no claims to the creators and inventors from the word at all, questions to the Ministry of Defense to order such systems and send them to the troops and claims to manufacturers unable to produce them in the required quantities.

[Nikolaevich I]

The "Lancet" is capable of carrying high-explosive fragmentation and cumulative ammunition and hitting enemy equipment and manpower at a distance of 40-70 kilometers.
Oh. give me a gar ... "Lancet" with a piston "twist"! Then I will show everyone "Arrestovich's mother"! And what ? Who would have doubted, but not me! Shaw limits "electroplanes"? Ash-stump, batteries! Well, the world has not learned how to rivet nuclear super batteries! You need a piston ICE! But the Lancet is small; and, therefore, the internal combustion engine must be small! And in Russia, it seems, different "halls" fly there with similar engines ... for example, there are 1-cylinder engines with a capacity of 3,8 hp. ! Quite a compact gasoline "motor" of 3,8 hp. will be quite sufficient for the "Lancet-5/7"! Let the warhead not be "super-duper", but bigger than the "Lancet-3", and such a warhead will fly longer and farther! Which will be in high demand! And next in line is an improved line of "lancets" ... well, for example, the "Scalpel" with a mini-turbojet engine and a PuVRD! Then we will show Scholz what to make liver sausage from, and we will force Zelya to sniff not "coke", but dust!

[Argon]

The issue is weight! If you make piston ones, you will have to increase the weight in comparison with the performance characteristics of the same lancet. Then you will either have to make wings with a larger area or add weight again. It is probably better to make an electric generator without a piston engine, but on the basis of some kind of chemical reactions. The drone is disposable.

[Nikolaevich I]

We need copters capable of "carrying" a radar that can effectively detect small drones (copters) ... preferably with "dual" power: from batteries and from an external electric generator via a cable-cable! "Petrol" copters can also fit!

[Volunteer Marek]

Create is created. But, here's the question: will MASS production be launched with acceptable quality and for sane money? We can shoe a flea. It is a fact. But when it comes to large-scale production...
Here the ghost of Comrade Stalin rises and shakes his head accusingly.

[dnestr74]

And what about the birds? Do not confuse?

[Fitter65]

Russian researchers have developed a new radar station (RLS) capable of detecting lightweight drones.

This means that they have just developed it, and there is no need to ask the question tomorrow, where is this radar, why is it not in the troops. Won Tornado only when they began to massively, not massively, apply.

[dfk-80]

A system for the protection of civilian objects capable of detecting sesna-type aircraft at 15-20 km, and the smallest drones at 3-5 km were made and sold for exactly three years.
Most importantly, she worked from the radio waves of the TV towers, and she could use her own radar.

[1erWahrheitsMinister_1984]

Jetzt müsst ihr von den Angriffsdrohnen nur noch eine Million Stuck
produzieren und vor der Küste der USA als "Liebes-Botschaft" aus
Moskau wie die Heuschrecken auf das verkommene Ami-Pack loslassen...!!

[maiman61]

Wir werden es einfacher machen. Wir werden ein paar "Poseidons" an die Ufer des Satans schicken und 300 m mit einer Welle in den Ozean spülen!

[maiman61]

We have a lot of obsolete Shiloks in storage. It is necessary to modernize them and put these radars. Destroying small enemy copters can fundamentally change the situation on the battlefield! Moreover, both infantry and armored coffins on wheels, these Shilka will be swept away with terrible force. It would also be nice to supply them with copters on a wire, which rose above the Shilka to the required height and hung giving a circular view to the crew! Then lumps would fly from everyone who was noticed by the Shilka crew.

[DMFalke]

The best news of the year. In a month, two will bring to mind and free flights of electric bees will stop. As with planes in the first world.

[g_ae]

When will she join the army? They haven’t created anything in Russia, but for example, they can’t do anything to replace the AN-2 for thirty years. But how many options have you already made for the "Ratnik" outfit? And where are they? And you have to collect first-aid kits for milking those mobilized by the whole country, as well as drones, by the way. And how many analogues and show-offs were! But in the Moscow Region they will say that we don’t need this, our grandfathers did without it and bequeathed to us. We already have everything, but what we need to buy, and from whom we need to buy.

[Leomobil]

And if I lift a fan on a stick or a screwdriver with a screw. As in Syria, teplaks were deceived, with a cat on a stick. Lies and nonsense, 10 gram drone for 150 km. Nonsense is complete. And what are you going to shoot down this drone with? at 10 kilometers. In short, another nonsense. The author is slightly lying, at 1000 meters, or rather 800. And not 150 gr. and one engine with a thrust of 1.5 kg.

[wladimirjankov]

The radar set it up well. Even better if they are quickly and massively produced and supplied to the army. But the most important thing is the creation of an effective, simple and cheap means of neutralizing these drones.

[storm]

The mass appearance of such equipment radically changed the nature of warfare.

Only Wagner's assault groups both hammered into frontal attacks and continue to hammer, where are the maneuvering actions, flank attacks, encirclements, landings in the rear of the ENEMY?
Where are the actions of our DRGs, or Russian DRGs do not exist and our army intelligence sits in the trenches instead of infantry, or in the same frontal attacks storms and clears farms and fortified areas?