One of the recently spotted Titan-S armored vehicles from the UAE was destroyed

In December 2022, the first footage of the use of Titan-S armored vehicles, which were used by the Ukrainian military during the exercises in Pripyat, was published (the units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine began to practice urban combat skills here on an ongoing basis). A few days ago, this model, armed with a 12,7 mm M2 Browning machine gun, was observed on the streets of Artyomovsk.

Judging by the materials that appeared on the network, one of the recently seen cars has already been eliminated. The video shows the movement of an armored car along a country road in a wooded area on the Krasnolimansky sector of the front. Her movement is monitored by a Russian reconnaissance drone. The course of the car was interrupted by a mine explosion.

Titan-S are produced in the UAE at the facilities of the Canadian company Inkas, which offers a whole line of light armored vehicles. The Titan-S is built on a Toyota Land Cruiser '79 OEM series chassis. It is equipped with a 8-liter V4,5 turbodiesel engine with 195 hp. The vehicle can accommodate up to 8 people (two crew members and 6 airborne troops). Reservation can reach the CEN B6 level (the hull must withstand shelling with 7,62 x 51 mm caliber bullets, the bottom - the simultaneous detonation of two DM51 type grenades).

Comments

[bk316]

Don't you think that the engine is weak?
I have a more powerful diesel on my typewriter, and it will be easier if it is not armored.

[Monster_Fat]

"One"... No comment..
PS: I see more and more such worthless articles appearing on the topic "One unit of something has been destroyed" ... Well, you need to write at least about some achievements, otherwise everything looks very, very, dreary ... And yes, lies are "non-chefs", no one even thinks about reliability, the main thing is to excite "turbopatriotism" ... One thing pleases, judging by the comments, some (far from many) have begun to understand what is happening, who started it, why it is happening and how it can end. But, alas, there are few of them compared to the rest of those affected by "turbo propaganda" ....

[Nexcom]

Be glad that articles like "A burst from a machine gun has not yet appeared. One serviceman of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was killed."

Threat And comments usratstso through the roof ... How to shoot, where to shoot. Why only one if there was a whole queue. Yeah. Until the whole queue - only one 200th VSUshnik.

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

You can read "one", you can read "first".

[Fitter65]

Quote: Monster_Fat

I see more and more such worthless articles appear on the topic "One unit of something has been destroyed" ...

And you carefully look at the article dated January 25, 2023 on VO

. Artillerymen of the RF Armed Forces hit a moving Ukrainian armored vehicle "Kazak" in the Liman direction with an accurate shot

https://topwar.ru/209497-artilleristy-vs-rf-unichtozhili-na-limanskom-napravlenii-dvizhuschujusja-ukrainskuju-bronemashinu-kazak.html
difference? In short, there this armored car is called "Cossack" and they destroyed it with one shot from a gun. There is already a Titan-S armored car from the UAE. What caption will appear under the same video on Monday?

[for]

Quote: bk316

I have a more powerful diesel on my typewriter, and it will be easier if it is not armored.

Your maximum speed is under 200, and under 100 is enough for him. Transmission heard.

[bk316]

Your maximum speed is under 200, and under 100 is enough for him. Transmission heard.

Not here, rather, the acceleration time to 100.
But this is just the combat vehicle will not hurt.
What confuses me is that the diesel is turbocharged.
Turbodiesel 4.5 liters at least 250 horses usually for 300

[Keller]

A couple of days ago this video was served under the sauce of destruction by artillery

[Rage66]

Is there a fundamental difference, what is destroyed? If yes, then only for the author of the news

[Vasily]

So in that news, the armored car was of suburban production, and the video too

[Skeptic3]

If the destruction of one car is given for two? Is there a difference? Why not three? Maybe call Konashenkov?

[gromit]

This is essential for the audience. Does Konashenkov also receive information like this? Nobody will remember about this armored car in a day. And the lies will be remembered.

[Fitter65]

Quote: Keller

A couple of days ago this video was served under the sauce of destruction by artillery

Did you notice too? It turns out that I'm not the only one on this site who carefully reads and looks at all the material. Just judging by all the comments, they read the maximum headline, and immediately scribble a comment ...

[Leshak]

I think this transporter is not for a full-fledged war, it is more for local conflicts and the fight against terrorists. In short, a police or border vehicle.

[Skeptic3]

Yes, this is an ordinary "civilian" armored car. He has no place in combat.
But such vehicles are very useful in a big war - for the rapid transfer of infantry along the front line, for the evacuation of the wounded, for the transport of ammunition and other cargo closer to the front line, etc.
Mobility is very important for a modern army. A large number of such machines, with proper use, just provide it.
And to participate in the battle there are other vehicles - with heavy armor and heavy weapons.

[Ghost1]

It is clear that these are transporters for transporting soldiers, and not for battle on it, but it is still better than civilian vehicles painted in khaki color, which have zero protection against bullets and explosions.

[Rage66]

195 forces for an armored car, this is about 40 forces for an Oka car ... It will not be enough, Arab bro.

[Nexcom]

in wartime, a lorry had 60 forces. and 40 is not enough for you.

[Luka Nord]

These are all trifles .. We are waiting for German tanks ., then everything will start like an adult

[AC130 Gunship]

Well, if you write a separate article about each destroyed Toyota-based armored vehicle, then VO will turn into a garbage dump. So they will start writing about the AKMs found in the bushes.

[Skeptic3]

The headline of an article on VO a year later: "Today, in stubborn battles, we were able to save a whole tank!"

[Repellent]

Quote: Skeptik3

The title of the article on VO in a year

Everybody. This troll is broken, get a new one.

[Alex242]

Judging by the materials that appeared on the network, one of the recently seen cars has already been eliminated. The video shows the movement of an armored car along a country road in a wooded area on the Krasnolimansky sector of the front. Her movement is monitored by a Russian reconnaissance drone. The course of the car was interrupted by a mine explosion.

this is just the beginning ...

[Alex242]

Quote: Leshak

I think this transporter is not for a full-fledged war, it is more for local conflicts and the fight against terrorists. In short, a police or border vehicle.

to fight the unarmed...

[Li17]

I see not only my irritation with such "victories" is growing. A truly authoritative site turns into a battle sheet in which they no longer know what to write. I noticed one more touch, the moderators remove criticism in this matter, i.e. dissatisfied should not be. There are fewer serious-level information articles, they have slid down to the yellow press ..., like, how is poor Rogozin and what was he up to! What is the point of destroying such a clunker, but if you tell every day ... Now, if they showed a captured-destroyed highmars or a destroyed echelon ... I think there are still experienced people here, for whom this ... all this leads to sad thoughts. If unnecessary and essentially insignificant successes are given to anyone .. And the fact that we stick out and are stuck in local battles, we ourselves also use junk, we have leaky air defense, counter-battery weapons at exhibitions ... we turn to Iran. And then ...., let's see how we bring down the patriots and leopards! Something seems to me....