Chronicle of the losses of the Ukrainian fleet in the Black Sea

Since the beginning of the NMD, it has been announced the destruction of all Ukrainian fleet in 40 minutes, however, even after that there were reports of the destruction of Ukrainian ships. In this article, we will try to figure out which ships of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were sunk and which remained in the Black Sea.

During the Crimean events of 2014, the Ukrainian fleet based in Sevastopol came under the control of Russia.

In Sevastopol were blocked:
Sevastopol (Northern) Bay:
- Corvette "Ternopil" U209
- Control ship "Slavutich" U510
- Sea tug "Korets" U830
- Tug "Krasnoperekopsk" U947
Streletskaya bay of Sevastopol:
- Submarine "Zaporozhye" U01
- Missile boat "Priluki" U153
- Missile corvette "Pridneprovie" U155
- Corvette "Lutsk" U205
- Corvette "Khmelnitsky" U208
- Control ship "Donbass" U500
- Hydrographic boat "Skvira" U635
- Rescue tugboat "Kremenets" U705
- Search and rescue vessel "Izyaslav" U706
- Transport "Dzhankoy" U754
- Transport "Sudak" U756
- Tanker "Bakhmach" U759
- Tanker "Fastov" U760
- Degaussing vessel "Balta" U811
- Vessel for control of physical fields "Severodonetsk" U812
- Keeling vessel "Shostka" U852
- Floating warehouse "Zolotonosha" U855
- Tug "Dubno" U953
- Waste collection vessel U954
- Boat "Chigirin" U540
- Training boat "Smila" U541
- Training boat "New Kakhovka" U542
- Firefighting boat "Borschiv" U722
- Diving boat "Romny" U732
- Diving boat "Tokmak" U733
- Sanitary boat "Sokal" U782
- Passenger boat "Ilyichevsk" U783
- Floating crane "Kalanchak" U802
- Boat "Korosten" U853
- Boat U926 (SBU)
- Novoozernoe (Lake Donuzlav):
- Corvette "Vinnitsa" U206
- Sea minesweeper "Chernihiv" U310
- Sea minesweeper "Cherkasy" U311
- Raid minesweeper "Genichesk" U360
- Medium landing ship "Kirovograd" U401
- Large landing ship "Konstantin Olshansky" U402
- Firefighting boat "Evpatoria" U728
- Transport "Gorlovka" U753
- Sea tug "Kovel" U831
- Anti-sabotage boat "Feodosia" U240
- Boat-torpedo "Kherson" U891
- Towing boat "Novoozernoe" U942

According to Dmitry Timchuk, the following remained under the control of Ukraine:
Warships of the Ukrainian Navy:
- Frigate "Hetman Sahaydachny" - U130
- Artillery boat "Skadovsk" - U170
Auxiliary vessels of the Ukrainian Navy:
- RSK (reconnaissance ship) "Pereyaslav" - U512
- Diving vessel "Neteshin" - U700
- Dry-cargo barge "Svatovo" - U763
Boats of the Ukrainian Navy:
- Boat AK-01 - U172
- Boat AK-02 - U173
- Anti-sabotage boat "Naked Pier" - U241
- Boat "Vladimir-Volynsky" - U721
- Boat "Southern" - U855

Ukraine were returned:
- Patrol boat "Priluki".
- KFOR "Yuri Olefirenko".
- Mine layer "Balta" ..
- Training boats "Chigirin", "Smela" and "Novaya Kakhovka".
- Diving ships "Pochaev" and "Kamenka".
- Sea transport "Gorlovka".
- Sanitary boat "Sokal".
- Pilot vessel "Shostka".
- Sea tug "Kovel".
- Vessel of control of physical fields "Severodonetsk".
- Rescue tugboat "Izyaslav".
- Marine water-filled tanker "Sudak".
Full chronicle of the destruction of Ukrainian ships in the Black Sea:
- On February 26, the flagship of the Ukrainian fleet "Hetman Sahaydachny" was sunk.
- March 3 announced the drowning of the boat "Slavyansk".
- On March 22, the Netishin diving boat was sunk.
- On March 27, the Pereslavl ship was sunk.
- On May 7, the boat "Stanislav" was sunk.
- May 8 announced the sinking of the project 1241 corvette.
- On May 11, a barge was sunk, blocking the Dnieper-Bug estuary.
- On June 6, a strike was made on the boat group.
- On June 10, the Vinnitsa corvette was sunk in Ochakovo.
- On July 7, an unknown number of landing craft were destroyed near Zmeiny Island.
- On July 24, a landing craft was destroyed in Odessa.
- On July 25, 2 landing craft were destroyed in the Dnieper Estuary.
- On August 26, a message appeared about the drowning of the minesweeper "Genichesk" and the control ship "Slavyansk".
- On August 31, the sinking of two self-propelled barges was announced.

Thus, if it is difficult to draw any conclusions about the boats, both because of their unknown number at the beginning of the NWO, and because of the US supplies, then of the large ships in Ukraine on the Black Sea, only the Yuriy Olefirenko SDK and the minelayer remained "Balta".

Comments

[Uncle lee]

This entire fleet will outweigh one cruiser "Moskva"

[dmi.pris1]

Now this article is completely out of place. If the conflict is incomplete, they will create their own fleet in at least six years. And it will be a completely modern fleet. This means that Odessa and Nikolaev must be liberated by all means

[art having]

If they wanted to release, they would not have left Kherson ..

[Serg65]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

If the conflict is not completed, they will create their own fleet in at least six years. And it will be a completely modern fleet.

And where will they do it?

[dmi.pris1]

Are they doing something for themselves?

[Serg65]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

they will create their own fleet in at least six years

Well, you have to write what they will create! And this is not a fact! Because unfortunately the conflict will be over!

[Bolt cutter]

they will create their own fleet in at least six years

Unlikely. Fleet- very expensive thing.

[EMMM]

Just cut off Ukraine from the Sea. At all!

[Comrade]

Quote from Uncle Lee

This entire fleet will outweigh one cruiser "Moskva"

Here we are talking about warships and auxiliary vessels of the Ukrainian Navy, which died as a result of the impact of the Russian armed forces or flooded on the orders of the panicked command ("Hetman Sagaydachny" above all).
The Ukrainian side is not involved in the death of "Moscow".
Statements by the Ukrainian side about the sinking of the cruiser by two missiles are a propaganda move (see. The death of the cruiser Moskva. Where the missiles "hit").
It's like comparing those who died in battles or shot dead by the AFU detachments with a militia or a Russian soldier who died as a result of an accident.

[dmi.pris1]

Do you really believe in chance? During the battle, the limit switch failed? Before that, everything was fine for forty years, but then, bam, at the right time, it refused? No, anything can happen with equipment ... But during a real battle, sin on this is very suspicious

[ZeeD]

It wasn't all right. Ships of this type were on fire before this incident. And the fact that there are no traces of RCC hit has already been analyzed by several authors.

[qQQQ]

Quote: ZeeD

And the fact that there are no traces of RCC hit has already been analyzed by several authors.

There are no traces of a hit on the left side, I agree with this. But nowhere is the starboard side shown, and this suggests that the arrivals were exactly to the starboard side.

[Bad_gr]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

.... Do you really believe in chance? Did the end switch fail during the battle? Before that, everything was fine for forty years, and then, bam, at the right moment and refused?.....

The operation of a ship in peacetime, and even in exercises, is not like in combat conditions. The load on the main units increased, they put into operation something that was rarely used - that's the failure in the weakest point, which, with an increase, turned into a disaster.
On the cruiser Moskva, the fire started in the turbine compartment, which was problematic even in peacetime.

[Bolt cutter]

arrivals were on the starboard side.

Did the missiles come from Turkey?

[qQQQ]

Quote: Bolt Cutter

Did the missiles come from Turkey?

Have you been shown a photo with the direction of movement and geolocation?

[Serg65]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

Do you really believe

Can you prove otherwise?

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

Do you really believe in chance? Did the end switch fail during the battle? Before that, everything was fine for forty years

Again. See the accident of the BOD Zakharov. Everything is one to one there, only the BOD was still able to be saved from death. But... by a hair's breadth

[Comrade]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

Do you really believe in chance? Did the end switch fail during the fight?

Do not take it as a transition to the individual, but you, judging by the questions, are far from the topic. If you are seriously interested in the topic of the death of "Moscow", read carefully the article in my profile.
This is not the ultimate truth, but there is enough evidence that there were no missiles.
If in principle you are not interested in points of view that differ from those disseminated by the Ukrainian and world media, just put a "minus".
Some choose faith, others choose knowledge - this is how the world works. You can believe in the sinking of the cruiser with two missiles, or you can know that there were no missiles.
And by the way, you write that there was a “battle”, but there was no “battle” there.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Comrade

The Ukrainian side is not involved in the death of "Moscow".

Did you drown yourself? Irresponsible sailors smoked in the wrong places and there was a fire with detonation of ammunition?

[Serg65]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Drowned herself?

Not without your help, of course!

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Serg65

Not without your help, of course!

Like I drowned? ))) Did you celebrate something yesterday?

[Serg65]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Like I drowned?

Yes, you are drowning it now, with great pleasure!

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Did you celebrate something yesterday?

And I will celebrate when you, as enemies of the people, are taken for a zugunder!

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Serg65

And I will celebrate when you, as enemies of the people, are taken for a zugunder!

You are not looking for enemies of the people there.)))

[Serg65]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

You are not looking for enemies of the people there

Come on, I've been smelling people like you since the mid-80s of the last century!

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Did you drown yourself? Irresponsible sailors smoked in the wrong places

Here's to you

“Shortly after the ship went to sea, a malfunction was discovered in the tire-pneumatic clutch (SHPM) of the afterburner engine No. 2 in the aft engine room. The commander of the BCH-5, Captain 3rd Rank I. Samoilov, decided to feed the clutch manually and for this purpose sent a sailor S. Rakitsky to the KMO. (Thus, the operating instructions for the gas turbine plant were violated). Subsequently, according to the conclusion of the commission members, the bleeding of air occurred either due to the closure of other contacts in the block by Rakitsky, or a violation of the time intervals between the replenishment of the CMP cylinder.
What happened next? And then, as experts suggest, there was a sharp drop in the load from the turbine, and it went haywire. Acceleration of the afterburner propeller turbine above the maximum speed led to a rupture of the disks of two turbine stages. In turn, the disks destroyed the turbine housing and pierced the double bottom of the KMO in the area of ​​​​the fuel tank. The fragments flew at the speed of artillery shells.
As a result of hot gases and atomized fuel entering the engine room, a massive fire occurred, followed by ignition of the fuel coming from the punctured tank. The ejection of the flame reached 15–20 meters upwards.”

This is a description of the death of "Moscow"? No, not at all - this is an accident at the BOD Admiral Zakharov. In which the chassis served as a prototype for the "Moscow".

[solar]

Looks somewhat naive in relation to the "Moscow".
If we were talking about an accident or a technical malfunction, it would have long been covered with all the details in the most official way, there is no doubt about it.

[forty-eighth]

Involved or not involved is an important question. And yet, the statements of the RF Ministry of Defense about the impossibility of carrying out towing operations due to the storm were disavowed. On that day, the sea was completely calm.

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: forty-eighth

Involved or not involved is an important question. And yet, the statements of the RF Ministry of Defense about the impossibility of carrying out towing operations due to the storm were disavowed. On that day, the sea was completely calm.

On that day, or rather the night, as I remember it was raining in the Crimea and Sevastopol, the wind was low cloudy. Not a hurricane, but not at all calm.

[Monster_Fat]

Or maybe the same list for our losses? To compare? Not? It is forbidden? then it's worth nothing...

[frog]

Will there be a look at the other side of the conflict?

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: frog

Will there be a look at the other side of the conflict?

No, it will not! Too many good and different laws have been adopted lately by gentlemen of the bosses.)))

[AdAstra]

Well, it seems like they are "people's" chosen ones and they accepted it all as the aspirations of the "people".

[UAZ 452]

It remains only to adopt a law stating that we have won in the NWO, all its goals have been achieved, and for those who have any objections - five years of strict regime.

[Virus-free crown]

Quote: UAZ 452

It remains only to adopt a law stating that we have won in the NWO, all its goals have been achieved, and for those who have any objections - five years of strict regime.

1. NWO is not a war, so we cannot win in principle, even in theory)))
2. And that the goals of the SVO have been achieved - so there is no need for anyone here. It is enough to declare this to the President at any time

[Lech from Android.]

While Odessa and Nikolaev are under the control of the Kyiv regime, it’s not worth talking about the destruction of the Ukrainian fleet ... Zelensky demands a submarine from the Germans ... under pressure from the Americans, they can give ... the Turks are building a corvette for the Ukronazis, the Americans are supplying their ships of the coastal zone .. .in general, it is necessary to deprive the Nazi regime of Ukraine of full access to the Black Sea ... then you can sing praises.

[Bingo]

Quote: Lech from Android.

Zelensky demands a submarine from the Germans ... under pressure from the Americans, they can give ...

How will she get there? "leak"? With a parachute...

[Lech from Android.]

Quote from Bingo

How will she get there? "leak"? With a parachute...

I don’t know yet ... but this is a purely technical issue ... it can be discussed if the Germans agree to hand it over to the Ukronats.

[solar]

How will she get there? "leak"? With a parachute...

There is no problem with this. Along the Danube.

[Xnumx vis]

Quote from Bingo

Quote: Lech from Android.

Zelensky demands a submarine from the Germans ... under pressure from the Americans, they can give ...

How will she get there? "leak"? With a parachute...

Along the river routes, across the Danube. This was already the case in WWII.

[Alien From]

Yes, the article is certainly strong .... everything is going on more and more wonderfully in VO ...... by the way, but the title photo is just epic, it resembles a pig's snout ..!

[skeptick2]

Quote: Alien From

article is strong...

Strong is not the right word.
The list of Ukrainian boats and tugs touched.
But we are somehow more interested in the losses of the Russian fleet. Not a word about them. And there, unfortunately, there were no beads with boats.

[agoran]

By the way, there was infa that the English base in Ochakovo was gouged, not a ship, but also nice.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

And I forgot that Ukraine had a fleet. How quickly things change...

[saigon]

Excuse me, does the presence of our fleet in Sevastopol tied to the shore help a lot of the army? No, of course firing rockets is understandable.
That's just expensive launchers for missiles come out and admirals in a beautiful form of salary drip. So, apart from the marine infantry, there is nothing to be proud of, alas.
They built a fleet, but where is the exhaust from the fleet?
For an hour, the naval infantry will tell me how and what and for what.

[carpenter]

Quote: saigon

They built a fleet, but where is the exhaust from the fleet?

Then you better remember the words of G.K. Zhukov about the fleet, then it will become more clear.

[parusnik]

They built a fleet, but where is the exhaust from the fleet?

"We built, built and finally built!" (c) "Set fire to Abdul!" (c) From an old children's joke ..

[Serg65]

Quote: saigon

Sorry

Don't even hope!

Quote: saigon

No, of course firing rockets is understandable.

Come on? And often they fly to you ... in the sense of a rocket?

Quote: saigon

That's just expensive launchers for missiles come out and admirals in a beautiful form of salary drip.

So salaries are dripping to flight generals, and missile generals, and railway generals, and sapper generals ... can you imagine?

Quote: saigon

So our naval, apart from the marine infantry, has nothing to be proud of, alas

Looks like the naval missiles get you a lot ...

Quote: saigon

From an hour the navy will tell me the infantry under

Why tell, infantry, it is infantry in Africa! She doesn’t need tanks, artillery, or aviation, and certainly not a fleet .. no one is needed! With a mustache!

[UAZ 452]

Agree. Whatever the outcome of the SVO, it will be difficult for the naval and landing lobby to maintain the same influence in the Armed Forces and the state as a whole as before. Yes, and for manned aircraft - big questions. Somehow it turned out that the main burden of the database is taken out (or not taken out) by those who for a long time were provided according to the residual principle - infantry, artillery.

[Amateur]

After the death of "Moscow" and "Saratov" it is simply a shame to read such articles.

[frog]

What about writing? Or is there a fundamental difference between a reader and a writer?

[Serg65]

Quote: Amateur

After the death of "Moscow" and "Saratov" it is simply a shame to read such articles.

Valerian or vodka?

[parusnik]

Ukraine on the Black Sea had only the KFOR "Yuri Olefirenko" and the mine layer "Balta".

Enchanting! Conclusion Does the Russian Black Sea Fleet dominate the Black Sea? Let's take Odessa and Nikolaev.

[Serg65]

Quote: parusnik

Hack and predictor Aviator

And how much does it cost to sell the Motherland now? Enlighten, please, do not take it for work!

[g.tit2015]

Unfortunately, one flagship of the Guards missile cruiser "Moskva" more than covers all our "achievements" in the maritime theater.

[Comrade]

Full chronicle of the destruction of Ukrainian ships in the Black Sea:

Martyrology is incomplete, as proof of this, a couple of examples.
Missing patrol boat BG 19 "Donbass" sunk on April 2022, 32

Or the armored boat "Lubny" R 178, sunk on May 15, 2022, and then raised by the Russian side.

And if we are talking about the losses of the Ukrainian fleet, it would be worth mentioning the captured armored boats of the Gyurza type (Akkerman P174, Vyshgorod P179, Kremenchug P177)

[Andrey Loginov]

I limited myself to the Black Sea, since Ukraine has obviously lost everything that was on the Sea of ​​Azov.

[next322]

the author better tell about the Black Sea Fleet and about complete domination in the Black Sea ......

[Dedok]

I don’t really understand why this article is now: wages for January have not been worked out?

[Serg65]

Quote: Dedok

I don’t really understand why this article is now: wages for January have not been worked out?

Strongly unnerving?

[saigon]

But who knows, well, I have a suspicion that the Seamans need to declare themselves, especially in large and beautiful shoulder straps.
Articles come to mind which battleships with battleships and the Oceanic zone need to be mastered.
And it turns out that the edge is just right, just artillery, infantry MLRS.
But how else do I look from an infantry point of view (there were articles about the point of view of the infantry) The fleet is practically useless on its shores, but there can be no question of a Russian city landing in Odessa. There, at the enemy, there is some kind of coastal complex and MLRS and just howitzers, the withdrawal of troops will not be possible.
Well, for which ocean do boats build a boom?

[Serg65]

Quote: saigon

about the landing in Odessa, the city is Russian and there can be no question

I have a question for the members of the "Landing on Odessa" club, how do you imagine a naval landing in a large city and what is the role of the fleet in this landing ???

[Serg65]

I agree that the actions of the fleet in this film can only be attributed to shooting a scene from "The Battleship Potemkin" on the Richelieu Stairs .... and then with a stretch

[kor1vet1974]

Against the background of the entire NWO .. a very positive article

[Serg65]

Streletskaya bay of Sevastopol:
- Submarine "Zaporozhye" U01
- Missile boat "Priluki" U153
- Missile corvette "Pridneprovie" U155
- Corvette "Lutsk" U205
- Corvette "Khmelnitsky" U208
- Control ship "Donbass" U500
- Hydrographic boat "Skvira" U635
- Rescue tugboat "Kremenets" U705
- Search and rescue vessel "Izyaslav" U706
- Transport "Dzhankoy" U754
- Transport "Sudak" U756
- Tanker "Bakhmach" U759
- Tanker "Fastov" U760
- Degaussing vessel "Balta" U811
- Vessel for control of physical fields "Severodonetsk" U812
- Keeling vessel "Shostka" U852
- Floating warehouse "Zolotonosha" U855
- Tug "Dubno" U953
- Waste collection vessel U954
- Boat "Chigirin" U540
- Training boat "Smila" U541
- Training boat "New Kakhovka" U542
- Firefighting boat "Borschiv" U722
- Diving boat "Romny" U732
- Diving boat "Tokmak" U733
- Sanitary boat "Sokal" U782
- Passenger boat "Ilyichevsk" U783
- Floating crane "Kalanchak" U802
- Boat "Korosten" U853
- Boat U926 (SBU)

Question to the author ... dear, share a secret, how did you manage to place all this in Streletskaya Bay ???
I am especially interested in SB-524 - aka Kremenets, SR-568 - aka Balta minzag, 33rd killer - aka Shostka and 23rd floating crane - oh God forgive me, Kalanchak?

[Pavel57]

An article for an occasion to talk about "Moscow".

[BAI]

According to the tonnage of sunk ships, Ukraine won the war at sea

[forty-eighth]

But in terms of the tonnage of luxury yachts, we have no competitors

[Plastmaster]

Quote: Comrade

The Ukrainian side is not involved in the death of "Moscow".
Statements by the Ukrainian side about the sinking of the cruiser by two missiles are a propaganda move (see. The death of the cruiser Moskva. Where the missiles "hit").

What's the difference, why?

[Kostadinov]

Quote: Bolt Cutter

they will create their own fleet in at least six years

Unlikely. Fleet- very expensive thing.

Ships will be given to them. How many old ships does NATO have.

[Hiller]

Here is the first thought after this author's opus: "Why did you write this, my dear man?" The second: "And the cruiser" Moskva "- an equivalent loss or what?"

[solar]

How many people wrote before the war that Ukraine had no fleet, and then look, you found a fleet, and what a fleet! :)))

On June 10, the Vinnitsa corvette was sunk in Ochakovo.

Decommissioned a year before, in 2021, and waiting for cutting into metal. But in fact, before that, as in 2007, it was put out for repairs after being damaged in a storm, so it never left it.

[1erWahrheitsMinister_1984]

Einmal davon abgesehen, dass ich überhaupt nicht verstehen kann,
wieso man völlig idiotischer Weise der Ukraine Schiffe die Russland
zu Recht erhalten hatte, wieder zurückgegeben hat, gibt es ja auch
noch andere "offene Rechnungen"...!!
Um glaubhaft zu bleiben und auch als eine Frage der Ehre, ist
in Abschluss der Feindseligkeiten mindestens noch der einzige
Flugzeugträger der Briten ohne wenn und aber mit einem einzigen
unmissverständlichen und knallharten Schlag zu versenken!!
Alles Andere wäre dumm und eine Riesenschweinerei auch dem
Andenken der Menschen zu Liebe, die bei diesem feigen Akt der
"Heckenschützen" aus GB ums Leben gekommen sind...!!