Biden adviser did not rule out the possibility of supplying "any weapons systems" to Ukraine

43
Biden adviser did not rule out the possibility of supplying "any weapons systems" to Ukraine

More recently, there were three unspoken taboos in the West regarding the supply of arms to Kyiv. were banned Tanks, fighter jets and long-range missiles.

At the same time, just the other day, the United States and its allies, after quite a long debate, decided to transfer Western-style tanks to Ukraine, in fact, opening a "Pandora's box". Following the supply of NATO tanks to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the possibility of sending Western fighters to Ukraine began to be discussed.



Thus, US Presidential Security Adviser John Finer, during an interview with MSNBC TV channel, did not rule out the transfer of any weapons systems to Kyiv, including F-16 fighter jets, which, by the way, Zelensky and his retinue have been “begging” for a long time.

We will discuss this very carefully.

- said the American politician.

Finer explained that Washington provides military assistance to Kyiv, based on the needs of the Ukrainian army in a particular phase of the confrontation with Russia. Therefore, one should not exclude the possibility of supplying various types of weapons, which the official confirmed.

It is worth noting that it is not only Biden's adviser who declares the possibility of transferring American fighters to Kyiv. Previously, a similar option was allowed in the Pentagon.

Thus, it becomes obvious that the United States has decided to sharply raise the stakes in the Ukrainian conflict. Therefore, the supply of long-range missiles to the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the foreseeable future cannot be ruled out.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    27 January 2023 12: 13
    This is no longer news, about the fact that the United States is ready for everything, it’s clear since last summer, the question was time and the preparation of Ukrainians for NATO equipment.
    1. +5
      27 January 2023 12: 29
      If they are already starting to catch those who fled to the eurozone and sent to the front, then what is the intermediate link for? So it’s not far from nuclear weapons, and it’s “not NATO fighting with you” ... It is high time to test the new nuclear weapons. I wonder what will happen to the tunnel in the west when a missile with a warhead hits it. And they still scoff and want to sign acts with the Republic of Belarus. Liars. It is high time to press and cut off from the West the same. I think in Iran and Syria the same lack of our missiles with nuclear weapons.
    2. +5
      27 January 2023 12: 30
      Quote: Murmur 55
      This is no longer news, about the fact that the United States is ready for everything, it’s clear since last summer, the question was time and the preparation of Ukrainians for NATO equipment.

      The Ukrainians don't care if they fly the F-16, not in a month, not in two. NATO will fly.

      And in matters of long-range missile strikes against Russia, they will just sit far away in a smoking room. Firstly, so that one can say about "Ukrainian missile crews", and, secondly, so that they don't do anything wrong.

      But just recently, Biden said that "tanks, planes and missiles from the United States in Ukraine are the Third World War" and frankly jibed at journalists who asked him about tanks. Said they were crazy.
      So, grandfather, after all, we didn’t come up with the Third World War?
      That is why I think that strikes against Moscow are not as far away as it seems.
      1. +2
        27 January 2023 12: 34
        Quote: Zoldat_A

        Ukrainians still fly on the F-16, if they do, then not in a month or two.


        By the summer they can fly.


        The House of Representatives of the US Congress at the end of last week approved funding for the training program for Ukrainian pilots on American fighter jets, allocating $100 million for this. The bill to amend the military budget has yet to be approved by the Senate and then signed by the US president.
        Air Force 20/7-2022.
        1. +2
          27 January 2023 13: 00
          hi!
          Quote: Aaron Zawi
          Quote: Zoldat_A

          Ukrainians still fly on the F-16, if they do, then not in a month or two.

          By the summer they can fly.

          The House of Representatives of the US Congress at the end of last week approved funding for the training program for Ukrainian pilots on American fighter jets, allocating $100 million for this. The bill to amend the military budget has yet to be approved by the Senate and then signed by the US president.
          Air Force 20/7-2022.
          Yes, at least 100 billion. Even if you prepare them for five years, they still won’t fly. And not because Ukrainians are so stupid - you can teach a hare to smoke, and bears ride bicycles.
          Ukrainians, no matter how you teach, are still a Soviet military school. And where the NATO pilot turns around and dumps, the Ukrainian pilot will deliberately climb on the rampage and be shot down.

          If the Americans are already complaining that the war in Ukraine "eats up a colossal amount of ammunition," then what will they say when the F-16s "shower in droves from the sky" (in this context, this is not hatred, but normal war statistics, where it will not work, as in territory of America on maneuvers, lose 2-3 fighters per year).
        2. 0
          27 January 2023 13: 43
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          By the summer they can fly.

          If not before.
      2. +3
        27 January 2023 12: 41
        In Zheleznogorsk, it is necessary to launch plutonium production reactors. If it's not too late. To withdraw from all agreements to limit strategic nuclear forces ..
      3. +1
        27 January 2023 13: 42
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        So, grandfather, after all, we didn’t come up with the Third World War?
        That is why I think that strikes against Moscow are not as far away as it seems.

        As soon as Russia liberates Vuhledar and Artemovsk, Ukraine will receive everything that the West asks for along with the United States, everything will be given out "like a pretty one."
        Not long left.
        1. 0
          27 January 2023 14: 26
          hi!
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          So, grandfather, after all, we didn’t come up with the Third World War?
          That is why I think that strikes against Moscow are not as far away as it seems.

          As soon as Russia liberates Vuhledar and Artemovsk, Ukraine will receive everything that the West asks for along with the United States, everything will be given out "like a pretty one."
          Not long left.

          I would like that by that moment we were not sitting here on our sofas and sighing dejectedly: "Well, we said ...", but in Moscow they were ready for this and responded with lightning speed, and did not start "drawing lines" and " express concerns" rushed. So that EVEN THE THOUGHT does not arise from someone to do something like that.

          Our confidence in the VO, and materialize, would have stood on the Polish border for a long time.
          I don't have red markers. I use a simple pencil "Kohinoor" at work (preferences remained from student drawings) and a fountain pen with a black rod.
          I would like it to be there, and Moscow, at least some draft from here, the vibes were blown ...
      4. +2
        27 January 2023 14: 51
        And in matters of long-range missile strikes against Russia, they will just sit far away in a smoking room. Firstly, so that we can say about "Ukrainian missile crews", and, secondly, so that they don't do anything wrong

        Rockets for the Hymars GLMRS with a range of 150 km and ATACMS with a range of 300 km can be launched by Ukrainian Hymars crews without problems.
    3. +1
      27 January 2023 12: 45
      It was predictable, the question was only about time and quantity.
      You look, and so smoothly we will talk about the use of nuclear weapons.

      Well, how can one not recall the catchphrase of Sergei Viktorovich Lavrov - fool
    4. -5
      27 January 2023 13: 53
      This is no longer news, about the fact that the United States is ready for everything, it’s clear since last summer, the question was time and the preparation of Ukrainians for NATO equipment.

      This is not news - this is extra proof of the correctness of the CBO.
  2. 0
    27 January 2023 12: 14
    Well, what for us these layouts? It's time to nip the bastard in the bud. IMHO, the fear was lost by the impudent Saxons.
    1. +2
      27 January 2023 12: 22
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Well, what for us these layouts? It's time to nip the bastard in the bud. IMHO, the fear was lost by the impudent Saxons.

      What does time mean? So the war has been going on for almost a year. Even partial mobilization was carried out.
  3. +1
    27 January 2023 12: 17
    deliveries to Ukraine of "any weapon systems

    ZBV1 Now your time has come.
    1. +1
      27 January 2023 12: 19
      The Kremlin will not agree to this. All events since 2014 indicate that they will not decide
  4. -2
    27 January 2023 12: 26
    Long-range missiles will be the last to leave these lines, the first to be delivered by aircraft. Of course, Konashenkov will shoot them all over Poland, just as he destroyed the Bradleys that were still moving through Germany.
  5. +2
    27 January 2023 12: 29
    I’m wondering, since everyone understands that soon the Outskirts will have all the weapons that used to be taboo, how is our Defense Ministry preparing for this, His Serene Highness? The stakes are raised, the lines, their mother, are erased. As one of the steps, I would suggest starting a demonstrative reactivation of the nuclear arsenal, conducting not educational rocket launches. Maybe it will cool the heat.
    1. +2
      27 January 2023 12: 43
      He, like "Gorshkov", recently sent them to the shores to train with zircons? Or not?
      1. +2
        27 January 2023 12: 54
        And what's the point of one Gorshkov? No, large-scale events are needed here, but they don’t exist, the “partners” are chilling, relaxing, but it’s necessary that their buzz should shrink to the size of an atom!
        1. 0
          27 January 2023 13: 14
          Well, it’s clear that one “Gorshkov” will not solve the problem, to put it mildly. But we really had nothing more to send to help him? Or did the submarine boats run out in Rus'?
    2. -1
      27 January 2023 13: 55
      Quote: Grandfather Mozai
      Maybe it will cool the heat.


      If we recall the Cuban Missile Crisis, then the supply of missiles to Cuba was indeed the same hammer on the fingers, after which the United States retreated. But apparently it is difficult to interest the same Cuba, or Argentina, or Brazil, or Venezuela, as the neighbors of the United States, now. And from its territory it is unconvincing, because. it is difficult for the West to show the seriousness of intentions, because there, no matter what they say, they believe in the adequacy of the Russian leadership. They don't believe Kim and they got scared.
      Therefore, Lavrov and his team are still touring the states, potential allies, such as Africa, lobbying to join the team for political weight. When the wall is against the wall, the number of participants plays an important role, not even leading, or rather, not leading to a direct skirmish.
      Well, on the other hand, on the contrary, they are trying to prevent the team from being assembled.
      1. 0
        28 January 2023 15: 11
        now it is unlikely to get a Caribbean crisis. because if it succeeds, nothing will change for the West, and Russia will become like North Korea, only almost no one needs its territory and resources.
    3. +1
      27 January 2023 14: 56
      What is there to talk about if we sell resources to enemies. Far from funny, they sold us with all the giblets.
  6. -2
    27 January 2023 12: 33
    It cannot be ruled out that nuclear weapons will also be handed over. Easy.
    1. 0
      27 January 2023 19: 49
      Quote: Shoulder straps
      It cannot be ruled out that nuclear weapons will also be handed over. Easy.

      Well, then, we'll wait until they are the first to apply.
  7. +1
    27 January 2023 12: 34
    If the planes were going to transfer, then immediately transfer the Polish airfields and pilots to boot. The Poles are terrified of how they want to fight.
    1. old
      +1
      27 January 2023 13: 03
      The Poles are terrified of how they want to fight.

      The Poles really want to fight, but they don’t want to get horror. And this has already happened more than once.
  8. -1
    27 January 2023 12: 36
    Biden adviser did not rule out the possibility of supplying "any weapons systems" to Ukraine
    The question immediately arises, when will you install your "Abrams" before talking about other "any systems"? There is no doubt that you will supply until the "rooster pecks" at the American fifth point, because you have made a very large bet on this conflict. But why ringing about something that the issue has not yet been resolved is not clear. Intimidate Russia? But this won't work.
  9. -2
    27 January 2023 12: 42
    Interesting. And if Zelya asks for aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines with ballistic missiles? And they will. Where will they put it all?
  10. HAM
    +2
    27 January 2023 12: 42
    As practice shows, talking about deliveries or not deliveries is just a smokescreen, deliveries are either already underway or everything is ready for them .. the matter is settled.
    1. +1
      27 January 2023 13: 19
      Not always. Let's take Belgium for example. Which is looking for tanks, passing along whatever it finds:
      #Belgium is announced set to deliver 80 Iveco LMVs to #Ukraine, along with 150 Volvo N10 Trucks, AIM-120s (For NASAMS), Small Arms and Munitions

      80 Lynx + 150 Volvo cars (which will take away the M113 and will transport people, and supplies - in general, trucks per brigade).



      However, without any announcements, but simply in passing, the former Belgian М113А1-В


      How many of them were transferred is unknown, but a possible supply pool is probably about 80 of these M113s.
      1. 0
        27 January 2023 13: 30
        They support their transport logistics. It is only here on the site that there are characters claiming that bridges, railway tunnels, railway traction substations and just roads do not matter much. Recall the Kherson bridge. For us and the supply of the group, it had the meaning "suddenly" and the bridges in the Dnieper, the tunnels in the west, the Kharkov stations and nodes, for some reason, don’t have the same critical importance for the General Staff of Russia. It’s a strange military operation.
        1. -2
          27 January 2023 15: 02
          Indeed, after watching TV, noodles hang from the ears to the floor. negative
  11. +2
    27 January 2023 13: 01
    Ps are leading to a nuclear war, it is necessary to accelerate with the deployment of Sarmatians and Vanguards
    1. 0
      27 January 2023 13: 09
      Quote: Prjanik
      Ps are leading to a nuclear war, it is necessary to accelerate with the deployment of Sarmatians and Vanguards


      Well, our General Staff, apparently, will soon remember about bayonet attacks, infantry squares and cuirassiers with broadswords.
      1. -1
        27 January 2023 13: 24
        You can still add redoubts and scouts.
    2. 0
      27 January 2023 13: 15
      Well, for now, the Anglo-Saxons think that we can’t use weapons, so there are no red lines for them. Therefore, they do not particularly react to the placement of Sarmatians, zircons.
    3. +1
      27 January 2023 13: 29
      it is necessary to accelerate with the placement of Sarmatians and Vanguards


      First of all, we must speed up with the reopening of bomb shelters. We still have enough nuclear missiles, even in excess.
  12. 0
    27 January 2023 13: 31
    Hmm ...
    In the comments here, in places, outright panic reigns, judging by this, some no longer believe at all in the possibility of our victory without nuclear weapons.
    1. -1
      28 January 2023 14: 50
      Remove the last two words from the record and everything will be correct.
    2. 0
      28 January 2023 15: 17
      How to win against a coalition of countries that has an order of magnitude more everything. And technology, and economy and soldiers, plus technology to boot. Tactical nuclear weapons ?, where should they shoot? in Ukraine, the economy, equipment and mercenaries from the outside. Launch a dozen zircons across Europe? And to sense, all objects will not be enough to hit. And what remains?
      I really hope I'm wrong.
  13. -1
    28 January 2023 14: 49
    Great news for our political bosses. I think the war will stop after the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine. The main thing is to hold on to this moment.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"