Sooner or later, the West will send tactical nuclear weapons to Ukraine, because it can no longer stop

120
Sooner or later, the West will send tactical nuclear weapons to Ukraine, because it can no longer stop

B61-12. illustration photo


The West has found itself in a situation in which it supplies weapon Ukraine, primarily because it can no longer supply it. Argumentation of deliveries: "help to democracy in Ukraine in terms of protection from Russian aggression." Although public opinion polls in Europe and North America already show that more than 62% of respondents on average across countries do not consider Ukraine a democratic country. Definitely, 29% of Europeans and less than 24% of Americans consider it as such.



Accordingly, Western governments are no longer just misleading their electorate, but are also trying to make sure that a Ukrainian suitcase without a handle is carried on anything in terms of finances and weapons.

If in February-March last year, the deliveries of Javelin anti-tank systems and Stinger MANPADS were discussed with statements that these were purely defensive weapons, then less than a year later, deliveries of the most offensive weapons were approved - tanks NATO production.

Although we must not forget that offensive weapons have been supplied to Ukraine for a long time. It all started with German self-propelled guns PzH2000 and Soviet-style tanks supplied from Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and other countries of Eastern Europe. For some reason, this factor is often overlooked today. And the reflection regarding the fact that "the Germans for a long time refrained from supplying tanks to Ukraine, mindful of the historical aspect" looks very strange. As if the supply of self-propelled guns is something else, and as if the PzH2000 is a weapon exclusively “for defense” and has nothing to do with the historical aspect.

In this regard, we can say with confidence that if the format of hostilities in Ukraine does not change, then everything will be delivered - up to tactical nuclear weapons with a “break” for fighters, attack aircraft and long-range missiles.

Here, the 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump, is absolutely right when he said that "if today there are tanks, then tomorrow there will be nuclear weapons." The radical West is ready to supply everything for its suitcase without a handle – if only the fighting spirit of the Ukrainians does not fade away and if only the Ukrainian military registration and enlistment offices do not lose their “valiant enthusiasm” in terms of catching new “cannon fodder” on the streets from Uzhgorod to Kharkov.

And so that this fighting spirit does not fade away, the West will lead Ukraine to the status of a nuclear power - if only because without this the future of the “square” is in any case a foregone conclusion. If the nuclear weapons are not transferred directly, then it is quite likely that they will place them on Ukrainian bases, which have already de facto turned into NATO ones. Including for possible launches from rocket launchers that have been transferred to Ukraine for a long time.

They would put nuclear weapons right now, but so far they are trying to squeeze the maximum out of what is available. And so far there is a protracted conflict with the ability to unleash the American military-industrial complex to unprecedented levels. stories scale, and at the same time try to “shake” Russia with Ukrainian Nazism and NATO armor for as long as possible.

The deployment of NATO nuclear weapons in Ukraine will also help save the face of the West in terms of continuing to hang out noodles about "defending democracy by all means and forces." Like, you see - we are ready to defend our values, and therefore we have to take the most extreme measures so that "democracy does not lose." Moreover, for the same United States, this is an excellent opportunity to bring its nuclear weapons as close as possible to central Russia without admitting Ukraine to NATO.

And this is not to the fact that you need to sprinkle ashes on your head and remember what is known about polymers. This is to the fact that Ukraine will not be handed over just like that, there is no need to harbor illusions. And therefore, you need to understand the level of tension and the fact that the West has long lost its sense of proportion and will not stop just like that. At the same time, think: are we here, in Russia, ready for such a development of events?
120 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    27 January 2023 09: 54
    The Kremlin is not ready, and it miscalculated with the development of events before the start of the NWO.
    Yes, and the flash is already lost.
    1. +16
      27 January 2023 10: 02
      Yes, along the way, the main flash is still ahead, so it would not be about .. sleeping.
      For good reason, we need to withdraw from the agreement on the termination of nuclear weapons testing and "bang" something somewhere for warning, otherwise we lost the shores in general.
      ..although, it will be possible to express concerns and draw the next "red lines", ugh, damn it ..
      1. GIS
        0
        27 January 2023 10: 57
        https://ria.ru/20230127/zapad-1847718208.html
      2. 0
        27 January 2023 11: 03
        The West found itself in a situation in which it supplies weapons to Ukraine in the first place

        Because we are 100% sure who will pay for these deliveries, and this is not only Ukraine. sad
        1. -2
          27 January 2023 16: 34
          Quote: dorz
          Because we are 100% sure who will pay for these deliveries and this is not only Ukraine


          And who will pay Ukrainian debts after the end of the war? I am very concerned about this issue.
          1. +1
            27 January 2023 23: 24
            Quote: Carmela
            And who will pay Ukrainian debts after the end of the war? I am very concerned about this issue.

            Who will stay alive.
            1. 0
              31 January 2023 21: 53
              there are not many options ... some types of insects, bacteria from and viruses
            2. -1
              1 February 2023 06: 18
              I really hope that the Kremlin will take off the rose-colored glasses with the mantra about “fraternal people” and force the Ukrainians to restore their country themselves or what will be left of it.
          2. 0
            31 January 2023 21: 52
            What do you prefer? shells or smooth pebbles? if you think that a limited nuclear war is possible, then think about debt.
          3. 0
            3 February 2023 17: 24
            Well, definitely not the regions that will become part of Russia. The question is different - which regions will become part of Russia ..?
      3. -1
        29 January 2023 18: 40
        I already suggested on Novaya Zemlya where the training ground is, to detonate a 50 mgt bomb in the atmosphere or on the surface for clarity. Chill Maltsov a little
        1. 0
          3 February 2023 17: 26
          This WILL NOT GIVE ANYTHING ... If only for something specific to give, for example, in Western Ukraine. Not a NATO country, but according to the enemy
    2. +19
      27 January 2023 10: 06
      I think this is nonsense. Nobody will give Ukraine nuclear weapons. There will be planes. And there will be missiles with a range of up to 150-300 km. To summer. And of course in small batches. Western politicians are very interested in the fact that the Russian Federation could not defeat Ukraine, but they are not at all interested in the victory of Ukraine. They relied on the mutual attrition of the parties, after which a ceasefire agreement would be concluded. By the way, the territorial integrity of Ukraine is in last place among Western politicians.
      1. +3
        27 January 2023 10: 49
        Why should the West "give" nuclear weapons, they can simply "give" Ukraine to create its own, and then do "oh, but we have nothing to do with it."
        Evil tongues say that everything is already there, they are waiting for the use of nuclear weapons by Russia, after which they will untie their hands. But those are evil tongues, we won’t believe them, because the Ukrainians are not quite crazy enough to do such a thing wassat
        Although the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant ...
        1. -1
          27 January 2023 12: 28
          eat? where? and where are these enrichment facilities?
          1. 0
            27 January 2023 21: 49
            Quote: Nastia Makarova
            eat? where? and where are these enrichment facilities?

            As far as I remember, they have a couple of institutes (or had until the age of 22) with everything they need, and they don’t need a lot of ammunition, up to 10 pieces will be enough for them.
          2. -1
            28 January 2023 00: 42
            and where are these enrichment facilities?


            For the simplest nuclear charge (albeit with a short shelf life and rather strong "radiation"), no enrichment facilities are needed.
            You can do with pure chemistry, without thousands of centrifuges.
            For example, isolate plutonium from spent nuclear fuel.
            Or irradiate thorium-232 in a reactor and get uranium-233 (which allows you to use a very simple cannon bomb scheme).
        2. +3
          28 January 2023 00: 09
          Here we must not forget that Ukraine is not able to create any nuclear weapons, except for some dirty bombs to create a provocation, and if any nuclear weapons appear on the territory of Ukraine, it will be 100% American weapons, the use of which we are more than reasonably should and simply even obliged to use our Strategic Missile Forces and destroy the crazy and presumptuous enemy in the face of the United States and Great Britain.
          1. 0
            30 January 2023 00: 49
            Should, but not applicable. Let's express concern and repeat the mantra that we were deceived
          2. 0
            1 February 2023 00: 11
            Here we must not forget that Ukraine is not able to create any nuclear weapons

            Quite in a state, this is technically not a super-difficult task, if you do not set yourself the goal of obtaining high performance, especially in storage.
      2. +9
        27 January 2023 11: 06
        Aaron Zawi
        Plus
        For some reason, no one here remembers what Harry Truman said at the beginning of World War II: "If the Germans win, we must help the Russians, if the Russians win, then on the contrary, we must help the Germans. And let them kill each other much more."
        Now the situation is similar. Nothing changed
      3. 0
        27 January 2023 16: 25
        On the part of NATO, a plan was announced in response to tactical nuclear weapons from the Russian side, any conventional weapons and a complete ban from Asia will be used ... but at that stage there will already be a high probability of unwinding the conflict to strategic missiles and no one here will write anything on VO
      4. +1
        27 January 2023 16: 38
        Sivkov spoke, as always, pessimistically:

        How much time does Russia have to defeat the enemy?
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsJ4Hgcs6-w
    3. old
      +9
      27 January 2023 10: 06
      The Kremlin is not ready, and it miscalculated with the development of events before the start of the NWO.

      At these rates, everything is possible!
      1. +9
        27 January 2023 10: 22
        laughing The evil Russians are the Kremlin spy, the master of multi-move? wassat Or that "elite" who has money over the hill? Personally, I would not be surprised if tactical thermonuclear weapons were supplied to the Ukropians, in Moscow they would still express their next concerns.
      2. +3
        27 January 2023 10: 59
        Quote: old
        The Kremlin is not ready, and it miscalculated with the development of events before the start of the NWO.

        At these rates, everything is possible!

        It was a completely different Russia. Both the Poles and the Swedes were once strong.
        1. old
          -5
          27 January 2023 11: 18
          It was a completely different Russia. Both the Poles and the Swedes were once strong.

          Neither the Poles nor the Swedes have ever been as strong as Russia is now, and if Poland had nuclear weapons, who knows what it would lead to. It is not a question of strength, but of political will.
          1. +1
            27 January 2023 14: 36
            Quote: old
            It is not a question of strength, but of political will.

            political will? I think this is more of an internal policy issue... in the external, there is a war of depletion of resources. During the Finnish war, all the Western press only reported on Finnish victories, but it all ended in surrender. A quick end to the NWO will only bring the next war closer.
          2. 0
            29 January 2023 13: 15
            By the way, as for the political will, whose will you mean - the will of NATO and the United States, so they have complete order with this, they supply everything that they promised to supply to the UkroReich, and the will of the Kremlin inmates is rather political lack of will, economic impotence and senile dementia. The whole world is laughing at our rubber red lines and countless hits on the CPR. How strong is Russia now and how is it strong? There are no war goals, no normal economy, no ideology. For thirty years, such an unsuccessful model of the state has been built that the bulk of the population is rapidly impoverishing, and the most active simply flee, and they are fleeing not from war, but from a state in which they have no future, no development prospects, and these are the results of anti-human reforms and those who implements them.
    4. +14
      27 January 2023 10: 10
      Previously, one had to think when, under kissing and vodka, they believed the word about the non-expansion of the predatory bloc to the east.
      And now everything can be, despite the fact that this same bloc stands on the border with Russia and threatens its European part with complete destruction.
      So even if there are no deliveries of nuclear weapons to Ukraine, there are still a bunch of countries on the border with Russia where such weapons will be delivered, starting from Poland and Romania and ending with the Baltic states, Finland, as well as Moldova and Georgia.

      The Soviet leadership, for all its shortcomings, behaved much more harshly towards a potential enemy and saw the bloc's threats even on distant approaches. The Russian leadership, to our common regret, had blurred their eyes for a long time and they began to see red lines only when the enemy approached the threshold.
      1. +1
        28 January 2023 00: 17
        This is all because the Russian leadership is still full of pro-Western liberals who are ready to act to please the West, hindering the implementation of instructions and discrediting the decrees and resolutions of the President.
      2. 0
        1 February 2023 00: 14
        Previously, one had to think when, under kissing and vodka, they believed the word about the non-expansion of the predatory bloc to the east.

        It was on vodka that they agreed to the expansion of NATO to the East in 1997. You can’t ask questions to a vodka lover now, of course ...
    5. GIS
      0
      27 January 2023 10: 56
      https://ria.ru/20230127/zapad-1847718208.html
      this is for you to read. there are different points of view
    6. -2
      28 January 2023 08: 47
      The Kremlin cannot organize support for the IRA in England, by the way, this would be a symmetrical response to support Bandera. But the Kremlin could have stopped the pumping of British investments and even their withdrawal. Otherwise, we have some kind of surrealism, they are waging a hybrid war, and the power of the Russian Federation is strengthening the UK. It's as if Stalin in '43 supplied liquidity to Germany.
      In fact, it turns out that the Kremlin is also an enemy of the Russian Federation since it helps to finance the supply of tanks.
      Let me remind you that not only the oligarchs, but also officials, in particular Shuvalov, invested in the British economy.
      1. +2
        29 January 2023 18: 51
        Shuvalov was remembered, Nabiullina was thrown everywhere with Russian funds and on what scale!
  2. -8
    27 January 2023 09: 56
    Here, the 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump, is absolutely right when he said that "if today there are tanks, then tomorrow there will be nuclear weapons."

    But for now, there is a problem with the "Abrams". The Pentagon does not have the Abrams tanks that Joe Biden promised Kyiv. Sabrina Singh spoke about this. She confirmed that the States are ready to provide Ukraine with tanks as needed. But first they need to be produced, and this will take months.
    "We just don't have these available tanks in US warehouses, which is why it will take months to deliver 31 Abrams to Ukraine. And I remind you that using these tanks will require training. And it will take a long time to train Ukrainians. And this is why we will use American production capacity to order these tanks for Ukraine."

    In addition, according to the publication "Politico", the only plant for the production of "Abrams" is packed with orders. The assembly line can produce 12 tanks per month, and they are already booked for the authorities in Poland and Taiwan. The latter ordered 108 tanks back in 2019, deliveries were promised to begin in 2024. Warsaw is waiting for 250 tanks to replace the T-72 - those that were previously transferred to Ukraine.
    1. +9
      27 January 2023 09: 57
      Quote: tihonmarine
      But for now, there is a problem with the "Abrams".

      It's just that Poland will put aside its tanks for the sake of transfer to Ukraine. And the United States will simply expand the production of tanks.
      1. 0
        27 January 2023 10: 09
        They can supply anything they want, tanks of all NATO models, combat aircraft, missiles, but nuclear weapons are already Russia's "playing field". With its nuclear arsenal, which is the first in the world, plus carriers. This is definitely a taboo for the West. They and their children, that's for sure, still want to live on Mother Earth.
        1. +8
          27 January 2023 10: 13
          Quote: Proxima
          They can supply anything they want, tanks of all NATO models, combat aircraft, missiles, but nuclear weapons are already Russia's "playing field". With its nuclear arsenal, which is the first in the world, plus carriers. This is definitely a taboo for the West. They and their children, that's for sure, still want to live on Mother Earth.

          Nuclear weapons are already clearly nonsense for delivery, until Russia starts figurating nuclear weapons in Ukraine, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will definitely not receive anything atomic. But the chance that Russia will start hitting nuclear weapons in Ukraine is very small, because even a total defeat in the war will not cause any serious problems for the government. Those who are dissatisfied will be rolled up by the Russian Guard, and the propagandists will tell everyone that they just won. Therefore, there will be a Lend-Lease similar to WWII, more and more, more and more cool. But without WMD. Therefore, Russia either ends the war this year, or think about how not to give too much.
          1. GIS
            0
            27 January 2023 10: 58
            this is for you to think about: https://ria.ru/20230127/zapad-1847718208.html
          2. -4
            27 January 2023 12: 31
            what can we give away? Crimea? Donbass?...................
            1. +9
              27 January 2023 13: 43
              Quote: Nastia Makarova
              what can we give away? Crimea? Donbass?...................

              Return to the borders of 1991, and forget about the confiscated billions.
        2. +4
          27 January 2023 11: 01
          but nuclear weapons are already "playing on the field" of Russia.

          Why's that? They have an argumentation: "NATO is not at war with Russia, these are all your bilateral showdowns," especially if the carriers of nuclear weapons are Ukrainian-made or the same modernized point-y.
          With its nuclear arsenal, which is the first in the world, plus carriers.

          The West, at the suggestion of dill, doubts both the availability of the amount of ammunition that we declare, and the efficiency of our nuclear deterrence system. Example? Please - a strike on one of the components of the nuclear triad in Engels and the absence of any reaction to this from Russia (the bombing of the energy system is not even funny), given that our doctrine contains a point on responding to such an event. Reaction - zero!
        3. Alf
          +6
          27 January 2023 21: 14
          Quote: Proxima
          With its nuclear arsenal, which is the first in the world, plus carriers. This is definitely a taboo for the West.

          Dear colleague! Back in 21, they were shouting here - no one will fight with a nuclear power. But Papuan has been fighting for almost a year and how it is fighting ...
    2. -3
      27 January 2023 12: 12
      "But for now, there is a problem with the Abrams. The Pentagon does not have the Abrams tanks that Joe Biden promised Kyiv. Sabrina Singh said this." and you believed them. all the Western press talks about shortages, breakdowns, the impossibility of urgent deliveries, and so on and so forth. you are being misled, this is a cover operation. you will wait for the appearance of abrams and leopards in the summer, and they are already on their way to the Ukrainian units. waiting for the appearance of NATO regulars at the end of the summer and they are already in place. or do you think the teroborona will carry out the spring offensive.
      1. -2
        27 January 2023 16: 33
        The main battle in the info field. They threw it about the tanks, ours pecked the chicken grain by grain .. although there were probably some other answers. You also need to know how to bluff
  3. +9
    27 January 2023 09: 57
    They are not even ready to bomb the railway, let alone respond to Yao. Anxiety is everything
    1. -5
      27 January 2023 11: 54
      Quote: Last centurion
      Not even ready to bomb the railway

      Maybe keep it for later? For example, so that the Abrams and Leopards arrive, and then cut off bridges and paths behind them. Without ammunition and fuel, they will immediately turn into "iron boxes". This will turn out to be a good depletion of NATO, which, as it were, is also a goal.
      1. Alf
        +4
        27 January 2023 21: 17
        Quote: Azim77
        For example, so that the Abrams and Leopards arrive, and then cut off bridges and paths behind them. Without ammunition and fuel, they will immediately turn into "iron boxes". This will turn out to be a good depletion of NATO, which, as it were, is also a goal.

        Yeah, wait until the entire NATO army enters the B / NA, and then abruptly bomb all the bridges. This is where they will give up, and Europe will become silk ... Not funny.
  4. +9
    27 January 2023 10: 03
    This is to the fact that Ukraine will not be handed over just like that, there is no need to harbor illusions.
    There were illusions until February 24 .. We laughed a lot, but they are pan-headed, but no one needs them .. The West is with us, not with them, etc. etc.
  5. -1
    27 January 2023 10: 04
    The author must have overdosed on fake alcohol. Nuclear weapons for Ukraine... Managed to come up with a big stupidity.
    1. +8
      27 January 2023 10: 12
      Quote: stoqn477
      The author must have overdosed on fake alcohol.

      Well, if you have it in the order of things, then fine.
      And by and large, the author, your humble servant, would be glad to be mistaken, but only after all, aren’t people like you constantly singing that the West “will never give Ukraine” first Haimars, then “never give Patriots”, now “never he won’t give up his tanks "... We have already heard enough of these songs of yours, thanks - and in what state you sing them there - under singed alcohol or in some other way - it doesn’t matter
      1. -1
        27 January 2023 10: 24
        Do you make a distinction between what you listed and nuclear weapons? If they give nuclear weapons (which will not happen), then they will go to the Third World War. There is no fool who would do it.
        1. +7
          27 January 2023 10: 31
          Ooh, from insults moved to a normal conversation. Well, progress...
          Now in Ukraine there is a world war going on (you can designate it as you like, but the fact remains), and your government - the government of Bulgaria - is actively participating in this war, sponsoring Kyiv with weapons and ammunition (and they started doing this almost the first in NATO ). As for tactical nuclear weapons, read the material more carefully if you want to comment. It is written there that the West has come to a state in which it can no longer stop, even if some grains of reason remain there
          1. old
            +3
            27 January 2023 10: 54
            The West has come to a state in which it can no longer stop, even if there are grains of reason left in someone

            If a fight is inevitable, should you strike first?
            1. Alf
              +2
              27 January 2023 21: 19
              Quote: old
              The West has come to a state in which it can no longer stop, even if there are grains of reason left in someone

              If a fight is inevitable, should you strike first?

              Familiar words ... And what will happen at the second moment, the one who said (this is not for you) did not think?
          2. 0
            1 February 2023 23: 41
            Quote: Volodin
            that the West has come to such a state in which it can no longer stop, even if some grains of reason remain there

            Naturally, he cannot .. He cannot stop half a million Ukrainians on the line of contact, even when he slowed down the supply of 155 mm, 5,56 and other crap ... little has changed in intensity. You should know this, it was at the end of November. And the reason was not the lack of this equipment, but the desire (attempt) to extinguish the conflict on the existing borders.
            Do you still think that if a Ukrainian or Russian soldier starts to miss the BC, then he will turn around, spit on everything that he has experienced and lost and will go home .... which many no longer have ??
            On both sides in the region, embittered people to the level of the chiefs of the General Staff. They will bite to the last. Bite to survive and not burn out from tactical nuclear weapons. There are no fools there.
            It's better to think about how to end it than to think about how we all get to heaven.
        2. old
          +5
          27 January 2023 10: 35
          Voices have been heard in Washington more than once that a limited nuclear war in Europe (when only tactical nuclear weapons will be used) will not only not harm America, but will even benefit. Ukraine will hit Russia with it, get an answer, and Europe will get radiation and refugees. Does the US have anything to lose from this? The main thing is not to give Russia a reason to use strategic nuclear weapons, and how many savages of the sheriff will die somewhere there should not be of interest.
          1. 0
            31 January 2023 07: 12
            Quote: old
            Ukraine will hit Russia with it, get an answer, and Europe will get radiation and refugees. Does the US have anything to lose from this?

            Well, for example, the collapse of world stock exchanges - after the London Metal Exchange and the Dutch technical diamonds are gone ....
            The collapse of currencies due to the liquidation of the euro.
            The collapse of suppliers of everything and everything in the EU ..
            Server crash in Europe...
            Bank collapse in Europe...

            People are not interested in anyone, but physical the loss of trillions of dollars can kill the sheriff no worse than the anvil that falls from the sky ...
            Maybe the sheriff will survive, but the fact that the trader will die of him is a fact. The absence of buyers is always bad for the seller ...
          2. DO
            0
            2 February 2023 15: 00
            old,
            Ukraine will hit Russia with it, get an answer

            Judging by the mass media calls for the Kremlin to be the first to use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine (which, I think, were mainly initiated from across the ocean), Washington needs precisely Russia's first nuclear strike against Ukraine. For if Ukraine is the first to strike Russia with American tactical nuclear weapons, the Kremlin will have every reason to retaliate with a nuclear strike "on decision-making centers", that is, on the United States. It is unlikely that the United States needs the risk of such an event.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  6. +10
    27 January 2023 10: 08
    The weapons supplied by the West to the Ukronazis, unfortunately, did not become a legitimate target for destruction ... as the "sovereign people" had previously announced.
  7. -1
    27 January 2023 10: 12
    They would put nuclear weapons right now, but so far they are trying to squeeze the maximum out of what is available. And there is still a protracted conflict with the ability to unwind the American military-industrial complex to an unprecedented scale in history

    A logical conclusion ... Do you think that there is a possibility of delivering tactical nuclear weapons to Ukraine?
    I do not think so. Whatever suicides there may be, but Russia, in the end, has the opportunity to respond in such a way that all the efforts of the United States will be reduced to nothing.
    And further. It is not profitable for the United States to lose trading partners in Europe (and military support too). Economically weak Europe (without cheap energy and other things) is an insolvent buyer. In addition, initiatives to buy for dollars only what is produced in the United States are sounding louder in the world. It's so simple and logical - I have a product and I want to be paid for with money that will not be taken away from me and will not depreciate ...
  8. +3
    27 January 2023 10: 12
    By the way, if they give it, ugh, in fact, it’s not if, but when ... In short, when the Sumerians are given the F-16, then they will have carriers. The next stage will be the bombs themselves. Those bombs, which, oh, it happened for some reason, just the UWB were modernized a year before the NWO
    1. old
      -4
      27 January 2023 11: 00
      This means that Putin urgently needs to issue an official statement in which to report on the consequences for the whole world of the very first takeoff of the F-16 from any airfield in Ukraine. Though training.. Message: I warned everyone, then do not be offended.
      1. +10
        27 January 2023 11: 06
        Isn't it funny yourself? Yes, let him speak - the whole world is already laughing out loud over the "red lines".
        1. old
          +1
          27 January 2023 12: 46
          Himself is not funny?

          If he speaks in the “moving red line” paradigm, then there is no need to speak at all. We sit exactly, waiting for the start of a vigorous bombardment. The F-16 will not reach the Urals, but it may well reach Moscow, if they don’t shoot it down, of course. Well, or it's time to start looking for another country with a potentially healthier climate.
          1. Alf
            +1
            27 January 2023 21: 21
            Quote: old
            unless they get hit, of course.

            And who will shoot down something? Engels proved nothing?
            1. 0
              31 January 2023 07: 16
              Quote: Alf
              Quote: old
              unless they get hit, of course.

              And who will shoot down something? Engels proved nothing?

              Yes Yes....
              3 air defense rings around Moscow completely mediocrely pumped M. Rust ..
              His landing on Red Square did not prove anything????
      2. +4
        27 January 2023 11: 37
        He will speak, and the Americans will immediately do it, and how uncomfortable it will be for Putin.
        1. old
          -1
          27 January 2023 12: 42
          Uncomfortable can become Western Europe. And perhaps all, with an unfortunate set of circumstances. Americans will be somewhere between all the same and good
        2. Alf
          +6
          27 January 2023 21: 22
          Quote: Kronos
          how uncomfortable it will be for Putin.

          But he has sands, skabeev, nightingales who will explain everything to the electorate...
      3. +3
        27 January 2023 16: 31
        Quote: old
        This means that Putin urgently needs to issue an official statement in which to report on the consequences for the whole world of the very first takeoff of the F-16 from any airfield in Ukraine. Though training.. Message: I warned everyone, then do not be offended.

        Is it like a bright red line? laughing
  9. -9
    27 January 2023 10: 20
    One way or another, the West will send tactical nuclear weapons to Ukraine, because it can no longer stop

    Wangyu - NEVER!!! laughing They will drive "to the left" - they will not have time to reach the accommodation bases))) So in this case we can not worry good
  10. +1
    27 January 2023 10: 21
    The West has found itself in a situation in which it supplies weapons to Ukraine primarily because it can no longer not supply them. Argumentation of deliveries: "help to democracy in Ukraine in terms of protection from Russian aggression."

    This is already overdone by the author. No one is going to start a third world war. Although they can do this if they are sure that our leadership, apart from talking about red lines, will not take any real steps.
    1. +2
      27 January 2023 11: 08
      Although they can do this if they are sure that our leadership, apart from talking about red lines, will not take any real steps.

      so they are 100% sure, our towers will not let them doubt
  11. 0
    27 January 2023 10: 27
    Ordered a new wave of nuclear weapons in Ukraine?
    Only it seems that everyone calmed down, they declared unreliable all the statements of Kadyrov and officials about our tactical nuclear weapons, the statements of the media about the dirty bomb in Ukraine, and here again, almost simultaneously, new articles ...

    Without facts, without photographs, without statistics and figures, but ... apparently someone needs it.

    But in real life: Western supplies are much smaller in quantity and assortment, and later in time than ours.
    those. it is logical that until we play nuclear weapons in Ukraine, then there will be no deliveries.

    There have already been a lot of stuffing, such as I-materials in a burned-out MRII, but these are just stuffing for hype (or for 30 pieces of silver, alas)

    By the way, "there - sooner or later", and negotiations on the deployment of Russian nuclear weapons in the Republic of Belarus are already underway, they wrote ....
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. -5
    27 January 2023 10: 32
    Of course, we will sleep and will not be able to transfer nuclear weapons to opponents of the enemies of the West. Yankee weapons, fool they will hand it over, and they will receive a nuclear strike in response, their sharovarny fantasy should not be hung on the ears of the Russians.
  14. +3
    27 January 2023 10: 51
    Quote: Volodin
    Ooh, from insults moved to a normal conversation. Well, progress...
    Now in Ukraine there is a world war going on (you can designate it as you like, but the fact remains), and your government - the government of Bulgaria - is actively participating in this war, sponsoring Kyiv with weapons and ammunition (and they started doing this almost the first in NATO ). As for tactical nuclear weapons, read the material more carefully if you want to comment. It is written there that the West has come to a state in which it can no longer stop, even if some grains of reason remain there

    For me personally, only an overdose of something above the level of beer can speak of the use of nuclear weapons in the 21st century. I can't have any other opinion about such a person.
    The Americans used it twice, they showed what it is capable of and that's it. Since then, it has been lying in warehouses and mines. And so it should remain.
    Our government sponsored nothing. They gave us some helmets and such nonsense. This is state aid. And you should not be angry at others, but at yourself. Before the start of the war last year, no one supplied Ukraine with such military equipment as it is now. There was no need. You yourself made them do it and now you are angry. Weird...
    1. +5
      27 January 2023 11: 09
      the government gave some helmets, and commercial firms sent the rest of the weapons (this is different) ...
  15. +3
    27 January 2023 10: 56
    A very strange article. Rave. No one has ever "delivered" nuclear weapons to anyone. The American nuclear weapons that are in Europe are under American control.
    And even the smallest vigorous bomb is not equivalent to the largest tank.
    You can "feel the red lines" as much as you like, but this is already a fiery line, a point ... after which everyone will feel bad. Any nuclear strike will result in a nuclear response.
    The author of the article does not seem to understand that the goal of the West - primarily the United States - is to keep this meat grinder spinning as long as possible. So that as much as possible went into it as the resources of the former USSR, and what is in Europe. Well, mansions on paradise islands are not at all superfluous for some.
    By the way, pay attention to how painfully they make decisions on each delivery "there".
    "This music will last forever if I change the batteries."
    And nuclear weapons are finita la comedy. Someone will then have to "respond for the bazaar", and answer very firmly. Already in history there have been cases when playful hands reached for nuclear buttons. Only these handles were beaten very painfully, and the handles that were nearby
  16. 0
    27 January 2023 11: 21
    Single deliveries have no military meaning, massive ones will provoke the Third World War. In addition, the supply of nuclear weapons is a clear violation of the NPT, and this is fraught with global consequences, such as the sale of tactical nuclear weapons to Iran or strategic ones to North Korea.
  17. +4
    27 January 2023 11: 44
    Quote: Proxima
    They can supply anything they want, tanks of all NATO models, combat aircraft, missiles, but nuclear weapons are already Russia's "playing field". With its nuclear arsenal, which is the first in the world, plus carriers. This is definitely a taboo for the West. They and their children, that's for sure, still want to live on Mother Earth.


    Overton Windows:
    The first phase - Unthinkable!...
  18. +4
    27 January 2023 13: 15
    Many doubt the reality of the transfer of nuclear weapons to Bandera, well, or its appearance on the territory of the military. And you remember what you considered unreal 30, 20, 10, 8 years ago, a year ago. And everything will immediately fall into place. And remember the famous saying of J.T. Dunning. And everything will immediately fall into place. Unreal?! Haha!
    1. +1
      31 January 2023 07: 21
      Quote: AKuzenka
      And you remember what you considered unreal 30, 20, 10, 8 years ago, a year ago. And everything will immediately fall into place. And remember the famous saying of J.T. Dunning. And everything will immediately fall into place. Unreal?! Haha!

      And who is stopping you from immediately transferring heavy missiles with nuclear weapons to Cuba, Iran and Korea?
      Once gone a booze??
  19. -6
    27 January 2023 13: 34
    Quote: Aron Zaavi
    They relied on the mutual attrition of the parties, after which a ceasefire agreement would be concluded.


    Debatable. They would bet if they started this game first. But the NWO was nevertheless started by the Russian Federation, moreover, having clearly deceived the expectations of the West. They were sure that Putin was bluffing and would not dare.
    The calculation that there will be mutual exhaustion of the parties is erroneous. The sides are too unequal, Ukraine will be depleted much earlier. And the conflict is still hitting the West too, exhausting it too, albeit not very much so far. Yes, the Yankees benefit from European problems in the short term, but in the long term, the economic weakening of Europe in general and Germany in particular is unprofitable for the United States.

    If the United States did not need a strong and rich Europe in a strategic perspective, the United States simply would not be engaged in its post-war reconstruction.
    It is objectively unprofitable for the United States to weaken its most powerful ally in the already near conflict with China.
    1. +6
      27 January 2023 15: 28
      Quote: Illanatol

      Debatable. They would bet if they started this game first. But the NWO was nevertheless started by the Russian Federation, moreover, having clearly deceived the expectations of the West. They were sure that Putin was bluffing and would not dare.

      Why not? It seems that the first information was in October. In January, we already knew the details. That's where expectations were deceived, it's that the operation will be carried out so stupidly.

      Quote: Illanatol

      The calculation that there will be mutual exhaustion of the parties is erroneous. The sides are too unequal, Ukraine will be depleted much earlier. And the conflict is still hitting the West too, exhausting it too, albeit not very much so far. Yes, the Yankees benefit from European problems in the short term, but in the long term, the economic weakening of Europe in general and Germany in particular is unprofitable for the United States.

      If the United States did not need a strong and rich Europe in a strategic perspective, the United States simply would not be engaged in its post-war reconstruction.
      It is objectively unprofitable for the United States to weaken its most powerful ally in the already near conflict with China.

      Ukraine would already be exhausted. Now, when it is supported by the leading economies of the world, it is silly to talk about exhaustion. The inequality of the parties swung in the other direction. There is no need to talk about the exhaustion of the West either. Now they will push all the junk, disperse the military-industrial complex with new orders, support their economy, roll back tactics and weapons in real battles, and then, you see, someone will get real combat experience. It doesn't look like exhaustion.
      1. -2
        31 January 2023 07: 24
        Quote from olgherd
        Ukraine would already be exhausted.

        You forgot the main thing - human reserves .. They are close to exhaustion in country 404
  20. -2
    27 January 2023 13: 43
    Sooner or later, the West will send tactical nuclear weapons to Ukraine

    What for? The article contains only emotions, but there are no convincing arguments in favor of supplying Ukraine with nuclear weapons.
  21. -1
    27 January 2023 14: 23
    I didn't understand?? and such articles are written in order to scare old fools or children?????. No one will send nuclear weapons to Ukraine. We are discussing conventional weapons or a peaceful solution.
  22. +5
    27 January 2023 15: 52
    You mean tactical weapons?
    The author, back in April 21, blew his cheeks and claimed that no one would stand up for Ukraine!

    https://topwar.ru/181644-ves-mir-s-nami-tri-prichiny-togo-pochemu-za-ukrainu-v-voennom-plane-v-sluchae-realnoj-vojny-ne-vstupitsja-nikto.html
  23. -3
    27 January 2023 16: 36
    Russland hat nur eine Möglichkeit zu überleben und die ist Furchtbar. Wenn sich Russland nicht dazu durchringt einen atomaren Vernichtungsschlag gegen Deutschland, Großbritannien und Polen zu führe, wird es kein Russland mehr geben. Mit einem atomaren Erstschlag schlägt Russland die Tentakel der Anglikaner ab. Die USA werden in diem Fall Russland nicht angreifen. Die USA machen nichts, was für sie zum Schaden oder gar ihre Vernichtung bedeutet. Ob der Rest der Welt Russland dann verurteilt dafür - na und - Das ist sehr schlimm, aber die einzige Überlebenschance für Russland.
    1. Alf
      0
      27 January 2023 21: 27
      Quote from mimicry
      Russland hat nur eine Möglichkeit zu überleben und die ist Furchtbar. Wenn sich Russland nicht dazu durchringt einen atomaren Vernichtungsschlag gegen Deutschland, Großbritannien und Polen zu führe, wird es kein Russland mehr geben. Mit einem atomaren Erstschlag schlägt Russland die Tentakel der Anglikaner ab. Die USA werden in diem Fall Russland nicht angreifen. Die USA machen nichts, was für sie zum Schaden oder gar ihre Vernichtung bedeutet. Ob der Rest der Welt Russland dann verurteilt dafür - na und - Das ist sehr schlimm, aber die einzige Überlebenschance für Russland.

    2. +3
      28 January 2023 11: 40
      Sie haben Recht mit diesem Forum. Esgibt nicht mehr Deutsche als einmal. Wenn auch nur ein Kraut anfängt, Unsinn zu schreiben, bedeutet das, dass das Ende der Welt nahe ist. laughing

      They are right about this forum. The Germans of the past are no more. Even if Fritz begins to write nonsense, then the end of the world is near .. laughing
  24. +3
    27 January 2023 17: 30
    Wow, 24% of Americans? I suspect that the rest of 76% don't give a damn about this Ukraine. Not everyone even knows what hemisphere it is in.
  25. +2
    27 January 2023 19: 28
    Quote: Decimalegio
    I didn't understand?? and such articles are written in order to scare old fools or children?????. No one will send nuclear weapons to Ukraine. We are discussing conventional weapons or a peaceful solution.

    You can discuss whatever you want. Though the influence of moonlight on the afterlife of prostitutes.
    The war is already on. World War 3 is NOW ON. Now. And the one who denies this... I don’t want to scold, but there are no other words, and so, the one who denies this - either fool or a liar. Therefore, I think that everyone with brains should reevaluate their plans for the future life, taking into account these prospects. However, you may not do this. See Krylov's fable "Dragonfly and Ant".
    How long the non-nuclear part of the war will last is hard to say. But it will ALWAYS end with the use of nuclear weapons by the side that considers itself losing. Neither Russia nor the collective West will retreat. Both sides have already done too much. Moreover, for Russia, as for a state, the non-use of nuclear weapons will cost, as it were, no more than the use.
    1. +3
      28 January 2023 11: 34
      Possible translational misunderstandings make it impossible for me to tell from what you have written whether you are a millenarian Christian waiting for the end of the world, or like those crazy Americans who dream of a nuclear armageddon to crawl like moles into their arranged bunker. with an underground container and live like Denzel Washington in The Genesis Code. In the first case, I advise you to mortify your flesh, confess and take communion. In the second case, I wish you to live in one of those terrible cities that there are so many in the world, where even a dove does not waste his droppings, not to mention that someone could spend a nuclear weapon to hit him. I hope the translation conveys irony. Regards and long life. hi laughing
  26. +1
    27 January 2023 19: 42
    Such supplies would be a direct violation of the NPT and I don't think they will go for it. If they did, it would turn out that the long-term debilitating sanctions of the United States and Co. against the DPRK and Iran are illegal, and the UN still has a completely unambiguous attitude towards the NPT.
    It would be much worse if the United States and Co. would simply fill up Ukraine with high-precision weapons and UAVs. They may well do it.
    1. 0
      31 January 2023 07: 27
      Quote: Knell Wardenheart
      It would be much worse if the United States and Co. would simply fill up Ukraine with high-precision weapons and UAVs. They may well do it.

      They could have filled up .. They have already howled about Ukraine's overspending of the unfortunate Javelins, which is a consumable
  27. +1
    27 January 2023 21: 56
    Quote: Aaron Zawi
    I think it's bullshit. No one will give Ukraine nuclear weapons.Airplanes will be. And there will be missiles with a range of up to 150-300 km. To summer. And of course in small batches. Western politicians are very interested in the fact that the Russian Federation could not defeat Ukraine, but they are not at all interested in the victory of Ukraine. They relied on the mutual attrition of the parties, after which a ceasefire agreement would be concluded. By the way, the territorial integrity of Ukraine is in last place among Western politicians.
    In general, I agree.
  28. -2
    28 January 2023 00: 26
    They would put nuclear weapons right now, but so far they are trying to squeeze the maximum out of what is available.
    Well, there might be such a temptation. Everything will depend on how the Kremlin is ready to play at high stakes. Uncle Sam will need to be told directly - as soon as the first nuclear weapon falls on the territory of the Russian Federation, the X-102 will go to Alaska without options. If they can, then all nuclear weapons will remain at the storage bases.
  29. -4
    28 January 2023 07: 43
    personally, I have no doubt that tactical nuclear charges for guns or tactical missiles will be supplied by the West and will be used in Ukraine as soon as there is a strong feeling that the Ukrainians will lose the war ... who exactly will supply the charges - we will not know .. at the same time the West does not risk anything - Russia has no reason to inflict a nuclear strike on any European country or the United States .. so .. we will trample on the spot for another year and I do not exclude that the strikes will initially be inflicted on Moscow ..
    1. 0
      31 January 2023 07: 31
      Quote: Krilion
      who exactly will put the charges - we will not know
      the owners of the charges are known for recounting. And I strongly suspect that some of them will certainly not supply nuclear weapons ... And the United States remains ...
      And yes, in this situation, no reason is needed. Alas ...
  30. +6
    28 January 2023 09: 44
    Almost a year of war showed the political weakness of the Kremlin and its inability to take decisive action and tough responses. And our leaders are not capable of waging a victorious war. It's like an army of peacetime and wartime. Our president is in peacetime. And our leader has accumulated a lot of critical mistakes and they are accumulating like a shaft. Everyone already understands, well, except for the stubborn ones, that the judoka does not know what to do in the current situation. They mobilized. Everyone was waiting for a winter company with a decisive offensive, and the winter would soon end and nothing. Why then called the people? It seems that the Ukrainians were simply frightened and decided to promote internal patriotism and convince the people that they need this war. But fatigue from the war is already appearing, and the further, the more.
    1. -3
      28 January 2023 14: 08
      And what, the Russian people do not need NWO at all? I understand that the people need everything good and nothing bad, but specifically, the Russian people hardly need Ukraine in NATO and with nuclear weapons. Initially, in 1991, it was agreed that this would not happen.
    2. +2
      29 January 2023 10: 08
      Behind the weakness of decisions are the lives of our soldiers. It looks like the plan is still positioning with the hope that suddenly something will change in terms of negotiations. Pumping Ukraine with Western weapons contributes to an increase in losses. Although the propagandists put on a good face when the game is bad, assuring that everything is going well, in reality the situation is serious. There is no internal mobilization in the country, as if everything is as usual.
    3. +1
      30 January 2023 01: 04
      He completed the main task - he said that we were deceived.
      All deceived m...
  31. 0
    28 January 2023 11: 33
    Nonsense, since then Russia can use everything, up to strategic missiles.
  32. 0
    28 January 2023 16: 09
    Quote from: dump22
    and where are these enrichment facilities?


    For the simplest nuclear charge (albeit with a short shelf life and rather strong "radiation"), no enrichment facilities are needed.
    You can do with pure chemistry, without thousands of centrifuges.
    For example, isolate plutonium from spent nuclear fuel.
    Or irradiate thorium-232 in a reactor and get uranium-233 (which allows you to use a very simple cannon bomb scheme).

    The latter is not so difficult technically, but the IAEA is catching it.
    By the way! Japan definitely tried to do it, but for some reason Fukushima rushed at the wrong time ... See. Article "Fukushima: Russia saved Japan from another nuclear bombing?" https://trymava.rf/?p=40553
  33. +1
    28 January 2023 16: 12
    Quote: Krilion
    personally, I have no doubt that tactical nuclear charges for guns or tactical missiles will be supplied by the West and will be used in Ukraine as soon as there is a strong feeling that the Ukrainians will lose the war ... who exactly will supply the charges - we will not know .. at the same time the West does not risk anything - Russia has no reason to inflict a nuclear strike on any European country or the United States .. so .. we will trample on the spot for another year and I do not exclude that the strikes will initially be inflicted on Moscow ..

    Do you even know that after an explosion, it is easy to determine by precipitation in which country, in which reactor and in what year the nuclear material that went into its creation was produced? At least in terms of the degree of contamination of the presented sample with the same gadolinium. Although this is not the only marker.
  34. 0
    28 January 2023 16: 19
    Quote from mimicry
    Russland hat nur eine Möglichkeit zu überleben und die ist Furchtbar. Wenn sich Russland nicht dazu durchringt einen atomaren Vernichtungsschlag gegen Deutschland, Großbritannien und Polen zu führe, wird es kein Russland mehr geben. Mit einem atomaren Erstschlag schlägt Russland die Tentakel der Anglikaner ab. Die USA werden in diem Fall Russland nicht angreifen. Die USA machen nichts, was für sie zum Schaden oder gar ihre Vernichtung bedeutet. Ob der Rest der Welt Russland dann verurteilt dafür - na und - Das ist sehr schlimm, aber die einzige Überlebenschance für Russland.

    Stupidity. In order to defeat the above countries, the use of nuclear weapons for the Russian Federation is not at all necessary. She will roll them out with conventional weapons. Simply because the release of ammunition is higher and the equipment is better and cheaper. I'm already silent about the human factor.
  35. -2
    28 January 2023 22: 35
    We got into this ...... why be a coward now. We must be the first to throw the nuclear one before they throw it at us.
  36. -1
    29 January 2023 09: 16
    A weapon that lies idle is not used, is useless. I'm talking about nuclear weapons. Therefore: most likely they will use, at least in the form of dirty or transfer technology, as an option, but unlikely, components for assembly. Directly? I don't think: this is World War III in all its glory. P S. Most likely, everything else is dirty and very dumb.
  37. 0
    29 January 2023 10: 18
    For me, it’s so complete nonsense ... first tactical ... then strategic ... then alien =)
    The fact that they are supplying weapons on an incremental basis suggests ... that they first establish the process and logistics and conduct long coordinations with their snoops ... no more, the plans probably immediately included tanks and infantry fighting vehicles and other NATO-style
    1. -1
      31 January 2023 19: 39
      I have been writing about the need for a powerful stratospheric nuclear strike over Kyiv for a long time. This will not lead to human casualties, there will be no physical material damage, with the exception of the failure of some electronics due to EMP, well, maybe the glass in the windows will burst, which would be good. At least it would be a statement that Russia will not stop, if something happens, from the use of a nuclear bomb.
  38. +1
    29 January 2023 12: 48
    We have been ready for a long time, but the authorities are not ready from the word at all. If Lenin and Stalin do not urgently appear in the country, or at least Minin and Pozharsky, she is a khan. Without defeating the internal enemy, one cannot defeat the external one, something like this
  39. +1
    30 January 2023 00: 45
    There can be no doubt. They will put it, they will definitely put it, and these nonhumans will use it against us.
  40. 0
    30 January 2023 02: 46
    It is necessary to warn and then shoot down US strategic drones in the neutral waters of the Black Sea. This will be the first serious step in the "red lines". And then trains and trailers with tanks right on the Ukrainian-Polish border.
  41. -1
    1 February 2023 06: 50
    With all due respect, let's think logically.
    Let's start with goals. And there is no need for freedom and democracy, this is not the goal.

    In my opinion, the main goal is to make a profit.
    How does the American scheme for profiting from the destruction of independent states usually work?
    1. The independent economy collapses, the dollar becomes the main currency.
    Based on this single point, there are numerous consequences useful for the United States:
    - the flow of cheap raw materials,
    - brain drain,
    - provision of territory for hazardous production and hazardous research,
    - cheap travel and sex services.
    2. The United States makes a profit in the form of utilization of its own excess money supply, additional sales markets, neutralization of competitors.

    Now let's think about how a global nuclear war could benefit the US financially.
    In my opinion, now the situation looks like this:
    1. The United States has been preparing Ukraine for decades, like a battering ram against Russia, in order to finally resolve the issue of Russian independence. They did, indeed, make large investments, but not too critical, in terms of the scale of the economy.
    2. The conduct of hostilities does not solve the problem of destroying Russia. On the contrary, there is a consolidation of anti-American forces, and a massive rejection of the dollar as a means of payment.
    3. The continuation of the policy of sanctions leads to the paralysis of the European economy. The question arises of the transfer of European production to the United States.
    4. And here a new question arises: will European factories operate in America? Will American society be able to "return in time" to the days of the mass working class, to abandon the thinking of financial bubbles, to recognize the flawed scheme of getting rich through stock exchange fraud?
    If it is as clear as possible: will the "negroes on benefits" go to "sharpen the nut"?
    5. In summary, war has both a forceful and a financial aspect.
    Power confrontation can be developed until the complete destruction of civilization.
    But the economic aspect has not justified itself. The US did not receive the expected profit. Operating costs are constantly rising.
    If new shipments of modern American weapons do not change the situation, this will further undermine the reputation of the United States, increase the rejection of the dollar, and allied defections will begin. Such a reputational fiasco is more dangerous for the United States than the surrender of Ukraine.

    Conclusions:
    1. You can't relax. It is necessary with maximum diligence to improve the quality of our weapons.
    2. We must try to minimize losses.
    3. It is necessary to consolidate society as much as possible, to maintain an acceptable standard of living for the population.
    4. A technological breakthrough is needed.
    5. It is necessary to get rid of the dollar-based economy.
  42. +1
    2 February 2023 17: 42
    Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
    I really hope that the Kremlin will remove the rose-colored glasses with the mantra


    Our Kremlins put on the pinkest glasses when they look at the "compatriots" of the Israelis.

    The Zionist regime of Netanyahu has already become dirty in its foulness, and now it is also preparing to supply its small-town missile defense system to their beloved Bandera.
    It is not enough for the Zionists that they delivered 1 shells (000mm) to the Nazis-Bendera.

    "To date, the US has sent or committed to send just over a million 155mm rounds to Ukraine. A significant portion - though less than half - came from stockpiles in Israel and South Korea," a senior US official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/17/us/politics/ukraine-israel-weapons.html
  43. 0
    25 February 2024 18: 19
    The author's imagination is all that matters.